On Sun, 29 Mar 1998, K wrote:
> > You're line against solopsism is almost contradictory considering
your > line against Bogdanov and insistance of the reading of
Emperio-Criticism. > >From what I understand, Lenin's veiw of the
universe was wrong, and > Bogdanov's was right, at least from the
viewpoint of what we know in 1998.
[1]
[email protected] replies:
Then you have been suckered by Tani's preening along with the rest of
the intellectuals with a class interest in Bogdanov's line. Bodganov's
philosophy when it departs from previous Marxism has nothing to do
with how the physical world works. It is strictly an issue of
neo-Kantianism.
For Bogdanov there is no truth apart from humyn experience. It's
really galling to read B. back this up when B. used to be so against
anthro-centrism. Once again, where did it go? What about the other
animals that existed before us?
Creationism and neo-Kantianism would be very difficult to tell apart.
The only difference might be that earth's history is lengthened from
4000 years to a few million years--still far short of the actual
truth.
Tani's stuff on physics and MEC could have been lifted right out of a
New Age tract on why there is a god. When I find the reference, I'll
show it to you.
Oh, I can see it now. Tani will come back and say she was being
"Socratic," not contradictory. It's pointless arguing. Maybe this is
what B. means by Tani having no ego--being willing to contradict
herself from minute to minute. That's why we should focus on the web
sites and involving more people.
