--
%%%%% %%%%%%
%%%%%% %%%% %%%%%% %%%%%% %%%%% %% %% %%%%%% %% %% %% %%
%% %% %%%%%% %%%%%% %%%%%% %%%%%% %% %% %% %%% %% %% %%
%% %% %% %% %% %% %% %% %%%% %% %%% %% %% %%
%%%%%% %% %% %%%% %% %% %% %% %% %% % %% %%%%
%%%%% %% %% %%%% %% %%%%%% %% %% %% % %% %%%%
%% %% %% %% %% %%%%% %% %% %% %%% %% %%
%% %%%%%% %%%%%% %% %% %% %% %%%%%% %% %%% %% %%
%% %%%% %%%%%% %% %% %% %% %%%%%% %% %% %% %%
dedicated to the art of the written word
================================
POETRY INK 2.05 / ISSN 1091-0999
================================
**Poetry Ink Electronic Literary Magazine**
~Dedicated to the Art of the Written Word~
Volume 2, Number 5
Issue 12 (August 1996)
This file looks best viewed with a 9- or 10-point mono-spaced font. We
recommend Monaco or Courier. If you are using a Macintosh, we
**highly** recommend you use ProFont 2.0.
We hope you enjoy POETRY INK, and we urge you to encourage the poets
and writers found in these pages by dropping them an eMail. All of the
writers featured in POETRY INK invite comments and constructive
criticism of their work, so support your local Internet Poet!
We accept no advertising, but we will plug stuff we think is cool. If
you are interested in having your chapbook, book, CD, magazine, or
software reviewed, please either contact us via eMail, or send the
item you wish reviewed via snail mail to the mailing address found in
our Masthead.
If you are interested in submitting work for possible inclusion in
POETRY INK, please see the Submission Information and Guidelines at
the end of this document.
Masthead
--------
**Editor & Publisher**
Matthew W. Schmeer <
[email protected]>
**Honorary Editor Emeritus**
John A. Freemyer <
[email protected]>
**Literary Correspondents**
Lawrence Revard <
[email protected]>
Phil Pearson <
[email protected]>
Shaun Armour <
[email protected]>
**Web Page Maintainer**
Wayne Brissette <
[email protected]>
**Submissions and Other Contact Info**
eMail:
<
[email protected]>
World Wide Web:
<
http://atlantis.austin.apple.com/people.pages/wayneb/PoetryInk.html>
snail mail:
Matthew W. Schmeer, editor
POETRY INK PRODUCTIONS
6711-A Mitchell Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63139-3647
U.S.A.
Legal Stuff
-----------
POETRY INK is copyright (c) 1996 by POETRY INK PRODUCTIONS, a wholly
owned subsidiary of the imagination of Matthew W. Schmeer. Individual
works copyright (c) 1996 their original authors. POETRY INK is
published electronically on a bi-monthly basis. Reproduction of this
magazine is permitted as long as the magazine is not sold (either by
itself or as part of a collection) and the entire text of the issue
remains intact. POETRY INK can be freely distributed, provided it is
not modified in any way, shape, or form. Specifically:
**You May**
* Upload POETRY INK to your local BBS and commercial online
services, such as America-Online and CompuServe.
* Distribute POETRY INK to your local non-profit user group free of
charge.
* Print out and share with your friends, family, classmates and
coworkers.
**You May Not**
* Distribute POETRY INK on CD-ROM without prior written consent
(Authorized exception: Pacific HiTech's Info-Mac series, provided a
copy is forwarded to the above snail mail address)
* Charge for access other than a reasonable redistribution fee (i.e.
online connection time).
* Charge Shipping and Handling fees for any media POETRY INK is included
upon (Authorized exception: Pacific HiTech's Info-Mac series).
POETRY INK PRODUCTIONS retains one-time rights and the right to
reprint this issue, either in printed or electronic format. All other
rights to works appearing in POETRY INK written by authors other than
Matthew W. Schmeer revert to said authors upon publication.
POETRY INK is produced on an Apple Macintosh Color Classic running
System Software 7.5.3. POETRY INK is initially uploaded to our
subscribers, with further Internet distribution by our readers. We use
Global Village Teleport Gold II Fax/Modems. POETRY INK is produced
using Claris Emailer 1.1.v2, BareBones Software's freeware BBEdit Lite
3.5.1, Robert Gottshall's and Rick Zaccone's freeware spellchecker
Excalibur 2.2.2 & and M. Akif Eyler's freeware setext reader, EasyView
2.6.2. We encourage others to support these fine hardware
manufacturers and software programmers.
>From The Editor's Desktop
-------------------------
If you are a new reader of POETRY INK, welcome! You have chosen the
perfect opportunity to begin reading POETRY INK, as we have recently
begun a restructuring process. If you are a dedicated subscriber to
this magazine, I am glad that you have continued your subscription to
this magazine, and I hope that you will bear with us during this
significant occasion.
This issue of POETRY INK marks a major departure for us; beginning
with this issue, POETRY INK is now distributed **only** in text
(ASCII) format. However,this file is specially encoded for use with
any setext reader (as is the venerable Mac eMail newsletter TidBITS_
and the excellent fiction magazine InterText_). In fact, if you are
reading this on a Macintosh computer, we recommend viewing this file
with M. Akif Eyler's EasyView 2.6.2. However, you should have no
problem reading this file with any plain-text editor or word processor
which can handle files over 32k in length. It's just that some
characters might look out of place or a little strange (like the
asterisks around this word: **boo**. The double asterisks are flags
for setext readers to "bold" the word "boo" upon display, much like
HTML tags, but easier to master).
The reason for this switch to an all-text format is three-fold:
One, it became very tedious to layout and format the eDOC version of
POETRY INK. In an effort to streamline the production process, we
decided to jump to producing POETRY INK in text-only format.
Two, we wanted a way to reach all the Wintel users on the Internet.
While POETRY INK was founded by a rabid Macintosh fanatic and is
produced using the Macintosh platform, it has become nearly impossible
to ignore the requests of the Wintel faction for a format that can be
read easily regardless of computing platform. By switching from a
Mac-only primary format to a text-based format, we instantly increase
our possible subscriber and contributor base.
Third, POETRY INK has increased in reach and now boasts well over 500
submissions per issue. Not to mention an increase in subscriber base
since we debuted a little over a year ago. So in order to slim POETRY
INK down to a reasonable size and in an effort to speed our selection
and editing process, we decided to skip using styled text-editors in
favor of a raw text-processor: BBEdit Lite 3.5.1. This has increased
our turn-around time and allows us to do other things in our free time
besides putting this magazine together.
While it is sad to see the old POETRY INK format pass away, I believe
that this new format is better suited to our purpose: to present the
best all-around literary magazine forum for the beginning as well as
the experienced writer. This new format is a step in the right
direction, and I invite you to join us as we meet our future. After
all, POETRY INK is dedicated to the **written** word.
So until next issue, Spill the Ink and May the Muse be Kind!
Matthew W. Schmeer, editor and chief poetry guru
<
[email protected]>
Subscription Info
-----------------
Due to popular demand, it is now possible to have each issue of POETRY
INK delivered to your eMail account upon publication. This service is
now available to all readers regardless of computing platform now that
POETRY INK has gone full-blown text-based.
Each issue of POETRY INK will be sent to your eMail account upon its
publication as an eMail file attachment. Most eMail clients and
commercial online systems' proprietary software will automatically
translate this file into text format; otherwise, you will need to
procure a utility to translate the file you receive into a readable
format. Please check with your Internet Service Provider to be sure
that you can receive eMail file attachments before you subscribe.
CompuServe and America Online do allow this functionality.
If you wish to subscribe to POETRY INK, simply send an eMail message
with the subject line "SUBSCRIBE POETRY INK: your real name" to
<
[email protected]>, where **your real name** is your actual name and
not the name of your eMail account. It is not necessary to provide a
message in the body of your eMail. For example, the subject line of
your message should look like this:
SUBSCRIBE POETRY INK: John Q. Public
You must follow this wording EXACTLY; otherwise our eMail macro will
not be triggered and you will not be added to the subscription list.
Sending a subscription request triggers an automatic reply, which you
will receive within three days. This reply will confirm your
subscription, and also provide you with information pertaining to the
POETRY INK subscription service. It is very important for you to save
the reply for future reference.
Please note that you will not receive the latest issue of POETRY INK
upon subscribing; however, you will receive the next scheduled issue -
and all subsequent issues - upon their release.
One final caveat: if you have submitted work for consideration and
your work has been accepted, you were automatically assigned a
subscription to POETRY INK, and therefore these instructions do not
apply to you.
Belles Lettres
--------------
A place for reader comments, criticism, and other assorted feedback.
The Write Thing
---------------
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Well, not completely blank, since the above non-empty disclaimer
appears in this space. What is meant is that this space is devoid of
meaningful content related to the rest of the document. This space
serves only as a separator between sections, chapters, or other
divisions of the document. This space is not completely blank so that
you know that nothing was unintentionally left out, or that this space
is not blank because of an error in duplication, or that this space is
not blank because of some other production problem. If this space were
really blank, you wouldn't be reading anything. This space has not
been left blank by accident, but is left non-blank on purpose. The
statement in this space should say:
"This space was intentionally left non-blank."
Notes From the Workshop Gulag
-----------------------------
by Lawrence Revard <
[email protected]>
**Fanfare for Science, Mortal Enemy to Poets:**
**The Evolution of a Theory**
The benevolent ruler of the critical etat and first star of my last
report, Helen Vendler, illustrates how academics set standards for
poetry. There are many avenues of influence upon poetry. Still, what
becomes the critical theory of the day in academia shapes or
interprets contemporary poetry. Awards are given with an eye for
such critical theory. In other words, money goes to that poetry
which reflects established values of critical theory. Having viewed
exactly such an award ceremony in my last report from the Iowa
Gulag, I now cast a roving eye toward a less heralded aspect of
literary theory: evolution.
Joseph Carroll, a professor at the University of Missouri--St Louis,
published a book in 1995 entitled _Evolution and Literary Theory_.
Carroll's bold, polemical stance in his book undoubtedly holds
little attraction for poets enmeshed in current Poststructuralist
critical theory. I contacted Professor Carroll over eMail and asked
him about the future influence of his book.
"My book is a drop of foam breaking away from a vast swell. It will
not go wholly unheeded," Carroll said modestly.
The idea that poetry and science could complement one another has
long been part of this century's critical backbone. Walt Whitman,
venerable progenitor of modern American poetry, stated this in
_Democratic Vistas_:
"As fuel to flame, and flame to the heavens, so must wealth,
science, materialism--even this democracy of which we make so
much--unerringly feed the highest mind, the soul.... Then may we
attain to a poetry worthy the immortal soul of man, and which, while
absorbing materials, and, in their own sense, the shows of Nature,
will, above all, have, both directly and indirectly, a freeing,
fluidizing, expanding, religious character, exulting with science,
fructifying the moral elements, and stimulating aspirations and
meditations on the unknown."
Ezra Pound, Whitman's cantankerous successor, stated his wish for
poetry to become the equal of science in "How to Read":
"People regard literature as something vastly more flabby and
floating and complicated and indefinite than, let us say,
mathematics. Its subject-matter, the human consciousness, is more
complicated than biology, is more complicated than are number and
space. It is not, however, more complicated than biology, and no one
ever supposed that it was. We apply a loose-leaf system to
book-keeping so as to have the live items separated from the dead
ones. In the study of physics we begin with simple mechanisms,
wedge, lever and fulcrum, pulley and inclined plane, all of them
still as useful as when they were first invented."
Despite Pound's hopelessly misguided desire to reduce language to a
systematized science, it is true that many poets have turned to the
discoveries of science to activate their ideas and metaphors. Hart
Crane, Robert Frost, Loren Eiseley, and many, many other poets have
enjambed the discoveries of science and the technological advances
of this century with eloquence. Meanwhile economics, linguistics,
psychology, anthropology, and a huge host of other academic
disciplines have turned their steely edges to splice the written
word of our poetic canon. But despite this, no single methodology
has emerged for literary theory or dominated the poetic voice of
this or any nation. Some scientists began to feel that the
profitable advances of their fields were going unnoticed and
uncelebrated in poetry. Richard P. Feynman, Nobel Laureate in
physics, lamented poetry's antipathy to science in his essay,
_The Value of Science_:
"The value of science remains unsung by singers: you are reduced to
hearing not a song or poem, but an evening lecture about it. This is
not yet a scientific age."
But Mr. Feynman was wrong: poetry has worked with the idea of science
since the inception of scientific method at the hands of Francis
Bacon. Bacon was known for as much for his literary endeavors as for
his experiments and books of unbounded aspiration. Science continues
to influence our poetry. But critical theory has planted its standards
at some distance from certain aspects of science, evolution one of
them. Matching such a nebulous theory as evolution to our literary
inheritance and ongoing linguistic acrobatics is a stupendous feat.
Yet in _Evolution and Literary Theory_ Carroll contends that it is a
possible and necessary step for literary theory.
"...I argue for the view that knowledge is a biological phenomenon,
that literature is a form of knowledge, and that literature is thus
itself a biological phenomenon."
Sound simple? It's not. Carroll's project, in his view, requires a
full debunking of the current theories of Poststructuralism: most
notably, Carroll attacks Derrida, Foucault, Fredric Jameson, Paul de
Man, and others as nihilistic rhetoricians. It is Carroll's
observation that Poststructuralists are hostile to the values of
empirical science. Thus, twenty years of theory stand in the way of
any motion toward science on the critic's part.
Charges of nihilism have often been levied against deconstruction
and Derrida. I asked Carroll whether he was suggesting we simply
ignore Derrida or consider the philosopher an outright liar. Carroll
responded as follows:
"...I would put the emphasis on stating that Derrida is an outright
liar. The central critical point I make about Poststructuralist
methodology is very simply that Poststructuralists habitually and
characteristically talk out of both sides of their mouths. In the
chapter on Derrida, I give a quotation where he denies that he ever
made any apocalyptic pronouncements--along with a sampling of his
apocalyptic pronouncements. This particular point is hard for a lot
of people to get into focus. They find it hard to believe that
responsible adults would make a professional career of equivocating
fundamentally in such a way that they constantly make absurd claims
(for their radical zing) and just as constantly take them back (for
safety). But this is in fact the strange truth of the matter. I like
the remark (forgotten who made it) on this to the effect that,
'There's the part where you say it, and the part where you take it
back.'"
Professor Carroll also expresses considerable animosity towards
those aspects of multiculturalism which espouse the nihilism of
Poststructuralism. How's that for a mouthful? I asked Carroll
whether multiculturalism currently had some intrinsic value for
academia. With vim, vigor, and an icy edge, he responded:
"I'm not sure precisely what you mean by 'multiculturalism.' If you
mean an effort to study and understand the world-wide array of
cultures, appreciating their peculiarities but also striving to
analyze them within the framework of a universal human nature, I'm
all for it. If you mean the systematic effort to degrade the
achievements of Western civilization (or the culture of the modern
industrial/technological world, which includes Asia) and
systematically to hype the achievements of more primitive peoples;
if you mean the single-minded hostility to all normative structures
('power') and the automatic valorization of groups deemed 'marginal'
to those structures, I'm not sympathetic to it. I dislike the ethos
itself, and I especially dislike the dishonesty that is endemic to
it."
Carroll is fighting for a new critical methodology against
overwhelming odds. Americans love underdogs, but it is hard to be
sympathetic to the abstruse jargon of literary theory. It will be
difficult for the academic community and the public participants of
poetry to disentangle all the different lines of inquiry and
judgment. Professor Carroll draws a line between the study of
literature and the production of literature. In doing so, Carroll
demonstrates how difficult it would be for his critical methodology
to be the means by which our very subjective awards for achievement
in literature are given.
"I make a distinction," Carroll responded to one of my questions,
"between 'literature' and 'the study of literature.' I'm not currently
keen on mysticism myself, but it is one possible literary mode; it is
one subjective perspective, a way of looking at the world. That's what
literature is for--the articulation of personal perspectives. The
study of literature, in contrast, is held more rigorously to the
criteria of objective knowledge. Art and science are different
things." But how different are art and science? Why should one be the
method by which the other is judged? There is some continuity between
the two elements as we perceive them. J. Robert Oppenheimer, in a
speech given at Columbia University in 1954, drew strong parallels
between the scientist's and the artist's place in the university and
roles in society: "Both the man of science and the man of art live
always at the edge of mystery, surrounded by it; both always, as the
measure of their creation, have had to do with the harmonization of
what is new and what is familiar, with the balance between novelty and
synthesis, with the struggle to make partial order in total chaos."
It is probably impossible to bring my airy conjecture down to earth.
I started by wondering whether evolution could be part of our means
of evaluating literature in the future. Professor Carroll succinctly
re-phrased my question: "A larger way to put the question would be:
what effect will the whole vast movement of evolutionary study have
on popular consciousness, and how will this eventually affect
literature and the study of literature? In my more sanguine moments,
as at the end of my book, I say it is just a matter of time. But
then, folly is a hardy weed. Decades? Centuries? Who knows?"
Who knows? I don't. But poets have a practical need to know how
their work will be received and interpreted.
About the Columnist
*******************
Lawrence Revard is a graduate student at the University of Iowa's
Writer's Workshop for Poetry. He welcomes comments regarding his
writings for POETRY INK. He can be reached at the eMail address at the
beginning of this column. (Okay, you lazy bum, here it is:
<
[email protected]>)
World Wide Words
----------------
by Phil Pearson <
[email protected]>
1 column, 2 reviews
**Portrait Of A Writer As A Would-Be Stylist**
Should I put Keats' "negative capability" into practice?
I think I'll commit myself intellectually to an avant-garde style.
How about identifying stylistically with the downtrodden of society?
Should I be an undogmatic, uncompromising, independent stylesetter?
I will radically experiment then and suffer or reap the consequences.
Shall I concentrate on stylish, trivial material to please my audience?
Should I resist spontaneity in my writing for sellable professional
fluency?
Might I present a tautly economic, spartan, antiliterary style?
Would it be prudent to profess scorn for middlebrow values as part of my
stylistics?
Should I pursue an unobtrusive, inoffensive style that will not offend?
No, I will write as a cerebral exhibitionist, full of sly, stylish
equivocation.
Should I sacrifice a serious high-style for a box-office low-style?
I shall deliberately take a subjective, egocentric approach as a
stylist.
Shall I thoroughly commit to pushing the envelope with the latest
modernist
devices?
Full of robust energy and fury, I will trick out my writing to look
"modern."
Might I pass myself off as a cautious neo-classicist, a
middle-of-the-road
stylist?
I really want myself to be seen as an urbane cosmopolitan, a
sophisticated
intellectual.
I'm going to take a try-every-ism-out-there approach with regards to
style.
Must I subdue my innate romanticism in favor of a philosophical style?
Should my pyrotechnic linguistic compulsions come to the forefront?
Technical brilliance before content, I say.
Will I ultimately reject all stylistic options or approaches as somehow
flawed?
To attempt to reconcile content with style should be my number one
priority.
I will make myself aware of the stylistic currents of my generation
before I
set off in pursuit of a style.
Should one be naively idealistic about finding a style, or be a
hardboiled
realist?
Can I consciously impose style upon my material? If so, will my style
be true
to my intent?
Am I doomed to be a stylistic wanderer my entire career as a writer?
How do I reconcile my disenchanted conformism with conventional
attitudes?
Should I be respectful of stylistic influences?
Is the medium the message, the message the medium, or something else?
Might I pose as a vogue stylist of fashionable influences?
Is style a zero-degree thing?
Am I a conscientious would-be stylist in search of a style?
World Wide Words Poetry Review
------------------------------
_The Dream of the Unified Field_
by Jorie Graham
The Ecco Press, 199 pages
"'alive, yes-yes-but wingless this ~between~, wingless--'"
The quoted line above sums up the reading experience of this inviting
selection of Jorie Graham's poetry culled from five earlier books. One
does wish, however, Graham would have included more as her selected
poems show a surprising lack of variety for what we are told is a
twenty-year span of work from 1974-1994. The copyright page only
confuses matters by posting 1980 and 1995 copyrights, indicating a
timespan of just fifteen years.
If we examine the development of Graham's poetry for the last 15-20
years, one of the most noticeable changes involves her use of a longer
line in her later works. Her early writings come across as suggestive
of Black Mountain poets like Charles Olson and Robert Creeley where we
have the notion of poetry-as-voice, utterance, shorn of image and
music, short-lined, attuned to the moment, self-obsessed. In fact,
nearly all of Graham's poetry never escapes the solipsist "I"
viewpoint, and the reader remains hard-pressed to find poems where she
breaks away from the too-comfortable home of first-person point of
view.
This poetic approach, unfortunately, leaves one often "wingless" and
"between," and wishing Graham would be more creatively liberal and
less a slave to providing rather programmatic first-person accounts of
nowness. Most of the contents from her first two published volumes,
_Hybrids of Plants and of Ghosts_ and _Erosion_, read amusical,
breathy, phrase-laden, dashed off. You encounter clippy stanzas often
containing lines of four words or less: "the memorial's/custodian,/
sitting on the porch/beneath the arbor/sorting chick-peas/from
pebbles/ into her cast-iron/pot./See what her hands/know--/they are
its breath,/its mother." Here in this passage you get a revealing look
at Graham's use of line-breaks too; she likes the dramatic, verbal
shear, which her later poetry shows no signs of giving up, of going
from phrase to phrase, thought to thought, in her over-compact stanza.
Thankfully, the later poetry loosens up more with a sensible decision
(witting?) to employ a longer-line approach that lets Graham's writing
attain a better sustained intensity. At times, these later poems
admirably capture a kind of Rilkean surrender to the inscape of
consciousness, which remains simultaneously tuned to the outscape of
historical time, "I"-time meeting "World"-time, found in the eleven
_Duino Elegies_: "The storm.../settles, in my head, the wavering
white/sleep, the instances--they stick, accrue,/grip up, connect, they
do not melt,/I will not let them melt, they build, cloud and cloud,/I
feel myself weak, I feel the thinking muscle-up-/outside, the
talk-talk of the birds-outside,/strings and their roots, leaves inside
the limbs,/in some spots the skin breaking--/but inside, no more
exploding, no more smoldering, no more,/inside, a splinter colony, new
world, possession/gripping down to form,/wilderness brought deep into
my clearing,/out of the ooze of night,/." In poem after poem, Graham
focuses continuously on these fractions of time and thought
commingled, subjectively, freely associating, ever insistent and
attentive to articulating precisely these ever-changing moments.
Sometimes this poetic articulation breaks down though, becoming overly
abstract and utterly imprecise. On page 146, "it" variants occur
twenty-two times, and the word "x" appears six places. Five "thing"
variations stick out like weeds on page 124. Should the reader not
demand, or the writer not be held accountable for, better preciseness
as to the tilled soil of language cultivated in
_The Dream of the Unified Field_?
On the inside front dust-jacket, a critic is quoted describing Jorie
Graham's poetry being "reckless music." I'm not sure "reckless" fits,
for Graham seems most purposeful, not insouciant at all. Maybe
free-wheeling. Partly atonal. Or better yet, a cartwheeling music
suggestive of the associative movement, non sequitur quality, and
existentialist play of her overactive mind on the page. She too seems
rather limited in both style and emotional range. Either too
predictable stylistically from one poem to the next, or too same-toned
as you advance from one stanza to the next. (You feel as though you
could randomly turn to a new page and not tell you were in a different
poem.) We get no acute Machado-like humbleness, no Vallejo-like
anguish of spirit, no Lorca-like alienation.... Also, in a few poems
silly stanzaic numbering intrudes and totally wrecks the reading.
Graham appears more intent in her poetry on us seeing and hearing her
skip a flat stone across a pond rather than having us watch the
resulting rings slowly spread outward or stop to listen to the
lingering resonance.
Her own words ring self-prophetic and best impart her approach to
poetry when she writes, "...how beautiful/an alphabet becomes when
randomness sets in/." Nonetheless, one wishes as well for the
patterned rings of life to unsettle some of the poetry of her
beautiful alphabet in the future.
World Wide Words Book Review
----------------------------
_Independence Day_
by Richard Ford
Alfred A. Knopf, 451 pages
**"A Great American Novel?" Not.**
Despite the _Publisher's Weekly_ dustjacket contention that "If it
were possible to write a Great American Novel of this time in our
lives, this is what it would look like," I would have preferred a much
tauter edited, small-intent novel. In fact, the book suffers some as
being too much Mom and Apple Pie-ish with its story line taking place
over a 4th of July weekend with, of course, a trip to Cooperstown to
visit the Baseball Hall of Fame. Anyone gagging yet?
Frank Bascombe, an ex-sportswriter turned real-estate agent, narrates a
multithemed tale which encompasses his "Existence Period" (the
narrative refrain to this wears thin after the first few mentionings)
and leads the reader through topics of divorce, race, urban terrorism,
murder, self-reliance, father/son dynamics, and obviously,
independence. Near the end of the novel, Frank offers up a
book-gleaned notion of realty being "the 'True American profession
coping hands-on with the fundamental spatial experience of life: more
people, less space, fewer choices.'" The last line of
_Independence Day_ reaffirms this sentiment: "I feel the push, pull, the
weave and sway of others."
For me, the ending paragraphs overstrain for lyrical impact, so much
wanting that F. Scott Fitzgerald Gatsby-like finish. The last
paragraph comes across as a cribbed Gatsby ending--the final line too
much a Gatsby line. A man prey to the currents of time.
Over the course of the 400+ pages, expect to be entertained, as well
as bored in passages, by a first-person voice constantly adding
asides, either dashed in or parenthetical. One is hard pressed at
times to find a paragraph void of these irritating interruptions, and
this intrusion takes away some of the pleasure of reading the book.
Emotional epiphany for Ford often is instigated by sound, be it a
phone ringing, a misdialed, wrong number intrusion, or the beat of
marching-band drums off in the distance. In point of fact, many of his
scene-ends predictably hinge on these moments. Pages 4, 159, 217, 312,
336, 451. You get the picture.... Also, he has a penchant to
overdescribe characters with long adjectival strings. For example,
"She had a high, confident, thick-tongued, singsongy Alabama
voice...and wore tight-wool skirts, iron-leg panty hose and pastel
cashmere sweaters." You get an overkill of descriptive detail to read
through, and some editing seems called for to rid us of some of this
excess. One wishes his editor would have been more on the ball in
producing a tauter book shorn of verbiage.
Just for comparison, I find the writing from Georges Simenon's
Bastille Day opening to his less-ambitious novel _Justice_ superior in
execution to Ford's opening in _Independence Day_. Here's part of
Simenon's beginning:
"At the bottom of the hilly street, the shady square by the harbor
still sported its decorations for Bastille Day, July 14, the palms
were a sumptuous green in the light of the setting sun, and the flags
hung as motionless as if painted on a backcloth.
And nobody realized, as the red of sunset spread halfway across the
sky and the blue in the other half gradually turned to green, as
sounds became sharper, suddenly swelling, then as suddenly dying as
though appalled by their incongruity, nobody realized that that
moment--an ordinary moment for all the world to enjoy--belonged really
to Petit Louis and to no one else, all the others being merely supers.
On the beach, near the casino and the diving board, a few people
still
lingered, lying stretched out in the sand. Mothers sauntered homeward,
dragging little children in bright-colored bathing suits.
Now and again a car would drive down the street, and then there would
be a slamming of doors and cries of greeting as figures in white
joined the other figures in white already sitting at the little tables
in front of the Potiniere."
Here's some of Ford's first two pages:
"In Haddam, summer floats over tree-softened streets like a sweet
lotion balm from a careless, languorous god, and the world falls in
tune with its own mysterious anthems...
Though back on my street, the first shaded block of Cleveland, sweet
silence reigns. A block away, someone patiently bounces a driveway
ball: squeak...then breathing...then a laugh, a cough... 'All
~riight~, that's the ~waaay~.' None of it too loud. In front of the
Zumbros', two doors down, the street crew is finishing a quiet smoke
before cranking their machines and unsettling the dust again. We're
repaving this summer, putting in a new 'line,' resodding the neutral
ground, setting new curbs, using our proud new tax dollars--the workers
all Cape Verdeans and wily Hondurans from poorer towns north of here.
Sergeantsville and Little York. They sit and stare silently beside
their yellow front-loaders, ground flatteners and backhoes, their
sleek private cars--Camaros and Chevy low-riders--parked around the
corner, away from the dust and where it will be shady later on.
And suddenly the carillon at St. Leo the Great begins: gong, gong,
gong, gong, gong, gong, then a sweet, bright admonitory matinal air by
old Wesley himself: 'Wake the day, ye who would be saved, wake the
day, let your souls be laved.'
Though all is not exactly kosher here, in spite of a good beginning.
(When is anything ~exactly~ kosher?)
I myself, Frank Bascombe..."
We get three "sweet"s in Ford's opening scene. A bit cloying, yes?
Ford, all too often, gives you an overabundance of sensory detail as
part of the narrative. Simenon provides a more deft touch with regards
to detail, tending to render a more stripped-down account to his
reader. And what about the all those "s"es in the opening line here
from Ford? Is "yellow front-loaders, ground flatteners and backhoes,
their sleek private cars--Camaros and Chevy low-riders" or "gong, gong,
gong, gong, gong, gong, then a sweet, bright adminitory matinal air"
overwritten. I think so. I suspect Simenon would have crossed out a
few gongs, and taken out "admonitory" as unneeded since we can see
that tone expressed in the appended Wesley quote. One also remains
unclear which Wesley Ford refers to. I guess we're meant to assume
John, although Charles was the chief hymn-writer.
A few other matters. The plot line regarding Paul Bascombe, Frank's
15-year-old son, struck out with me. Readers of the novel will
understand my use of "struck." I found Paul unconvincing as a
character, too much an adult. He comes across more as an intellectual
alter ego of a young Frank rather than as a fully realized individual
creation. Also, Paul's denouement has me asking, "Why such a
melodramatic, soap-opera-ish twist?"
The Markhams' plot thread was a riot and had me turning pages waiting
impatiently for them to show up again. Every real estate agent, I'm
sure, would nod in recognition of what Joe and Phyllis represent, and
Ford conceived and displays these clients-from-hell in a most engaging
way. The repartee between them, and with Frank, is rendered by Ford
with comic brilliance, but he underplays them, and I for one wished
they would have been more center-stage, especially at the end where
they rather inexplicably disappear.
In addition, I thoroughly enjoyed the passages where Frank calls in
and retrieves his waiting phone messages, as here Ford lets the words
of his dialogue work for him to full effect without overtaxing his
reader with excessive scene-setting detail. Instead, the reader's mind
gets free leeway to create the imagined implications from the
recordings.
All in all, _Independence Day_ could have stood more sharper editing
with attention to verbiage, superfluous scenes, stylistic choices, and
plot lines. The beginning and ending stick out oddly for their
stylistic lyricism, but the rest of Ford's novel, thank goodness, does
not come close to even matching these strained passages. Certainly a
recommended read for fiction-lovers for its scope, although
over-ambitious, its fine comedy, and its thematic exploration of human
independence. Most certainly not "A Great American Novel."
About the Columnist
*******************
Phil Pearson hails from Tulsa, Oklahoma, where he's involved in higher
education and enjoys fiddling around with multimedia projects. A Mac
aficionado, Editor-in-Chief of the popular "MacSurfer's Headline News"
netsite and the upcoming _MacSurf Magazine_, he maintains a keen
interest in twentieth-century poetry and fiction. In his quieter
moments, he can often be found fishing for yellow perch and the
elusive walleye.
Illiterati
----------
by Shaun Armour <
[email protected]>>
**"Le Grand Meaulnes"("The Wanderer") & "In the Skin of a Lion"**
"Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be
chewed and digested."
--Sir Francis Bacon,
"Of Studies," _Essays_ (1625)
This is not a book review column. Anyone can offer their opinion about
what is bad. I am going to do something much more arrogant and
foolhardy. I am going to attempt to guide you to what I think are
brilliant, powerful books. Novels that have been forgotten, or were
never acknowledged. These are works that were short listed for awards
nobody has ever heard of; or they were eclipsed by another of the
authors works that caught the public's fancy. I will laud them with
praise and beg you to read them. I'm probably even stupid enough to
lend you my copy,the one that I went to seven used book shops to find.
If great words aren't read, then they are just spots of ink on dead
wood. Think of me as a literary pimp. Trust me, just spend a little
time with these literary wallflowers and they will teach you to dance.
To give myself a fighting chance of enticing you into reading one of
my selections, I will be discussing two novels in each column.Of the
two books, one will have been published at least thirty years ago,
(this is an arbitrary number and in no way meant to suggest that
thirty years makes it really old) while the other will be more recent,
and generally small- or foreign-press. There is a method to this
madness. The twentieth century has been an age of massive
experimentation and cannibalization of the novelistic and poetic form.
Certainly nothing has defined this experimentation as much as the
wealth of work available in translation. Most authors are avid
readers, and as much as every author covets and defends his or her
voice, few deny the significance and power that other writers have
played in the development of their literary style and freedom. With
this in mind the two books discussed will often be linked
thematically; hopefully, this will shed some insight into the
development of ideas and how they are realized and evolve through the
written word in our century.
"How many a man has dated a new era in his life from the reading of a
book!"
--Henry David Thoreau
"Reading", _Walden_ (1854)
Alain-Fournier's "Le Grand Meaulnes", or "The Wanderer" as it is known
in English, was published in France just prior to the First World War.
Fournier drew widely from his personal experiences and youth in the
French countryside of Nancay and Sologne to create his lyric and
evocative tale of two young friends, Seurel and Meaulnes, and their
ascension to manhood at the turn of the twentieth century. Sadly, "The
Wanderer" was Fournier's only novel. Fournier was killed at the age of
twenty-eight, in fighting at the front of Saint-Remy. His body was
never recovered. It wasn't until nearly ten years after the war that
his novel quietly began to be recognized as one of the century's
masterpieces of French literature. "The Wanderer" is a simple,
eloquent period piece, capturing an age of innocence in France at the
turn of the century and prior to the Great War.
Ostensibly, the novel is the story of Meaulnes, a charismatic, teenage
student, who briefly runs away from school and becomes lost in the
French countryside. While lost, Meaulnes stumbles upon an old chateau
that is being used for a magical, and ill-fated wedding party.
Meaulnes, tired and hungry, poses as one of the guests and learns that
the young Master of the chateau, Frantz De Galais, has promised his
betrothed an enchanted festival populated and dedicated to children,
their games, and their desires. This strange party establishes the
motif of the rest of the novel--the search for lost innocence and
beauty. It is at the party that we learn that "The Wanderer" is also a
love story. Meaulnes meets and falls in love with a young woman, but
due to circumstances at the wedding party, he is forced to leave
abruptly, and once again becomes hopelessly lost while trying to find
his way home.
The story is told by Meaulnes's friend and confidant, Seurel. Upon
returning to school, Meaulnes slowly confides the tale of his journey
to Seurel and draws him into the search for the lady of the chateau.
It is this search--spanning many years--and the growth of the two
young men which "The Wanderer" chronicles. An eloquent little trick is
played on us by this book. The reader quickly comes to identify with
Seurel, and like him is drawn into the mystery of the story. For the
most part, Seurel is a passive character and is aware that the only
magic in his own life is defined by his relationship to the tale of
Meaulnes. His desire to take a more active part in the story is
palpable as Seurel searches for clues and begins to unravel the
mysterious threads that bind the tale. Seurel's moment arrives when
Meaulnes is ready to give up the search for the lady of the chateau.
It is Seurel, perhaps selfishly wanting to story to continue, who
forces him to go on looking.
"The Wanderer" is a languid book that begs to be read slowly in a
quiet place. It is simple, but in no way simplistic. The strange
festival early in the novel is the key and climax to the whole tale,
and in many ways the rest of the story is a thoughtful, melancholic
denouement. The whole work is suffused with a palpable feeling of
reverie and nostalgia; indeed it is brought to us through Seurel's
memories and reminiscences as if he is trying to bring closure to the
tale through his final telling of it. In a strange way Seurel becomes
the tragic figure of the story, never really living the adventure but
forever being changed and defined by it.
Michael Ondaatje uses a very similar style, but a radically different
structure in creating his brilliant novel "In the Skin of a Lion".
Like Alain-Fournier, Ondaatje sets his novel in the early part of the
century, this time in the immigrant-filled city of Toronto, Canada.
"In the Skin" is also a retelling of stories by the main character,
Patrick Lewis. Patrick Lewis, like Seurel, is a man who's self has
been created as a byproduct of the stories and lives of other
characters in the book. Unlike Fournier however, Ondaatje has created
a much more complex and enigmatic structure for his book. "In the
Skin" begins by quoting from John Berger's, Booker Prize winning novel
"G": "Never again will a single story be told as though it were the
only one." Indeed Ondaatje defies many of the classic structures of
the novel form, shifting tense, time and genre, like a literary
acrobat. "In the Skin" doesn't so much tell a single straightforward
narrative as it weaves a mosaic of little stories together into a
grand, coherent design.
Michael Ondaatje is one of Canada's greatest living poets. Born in Sri
Lanka in 1943 he immigrated to Canada in 1962 and published his first
book of poetry, "The Dainty Monsters" through Coach House Press in
1967. (A sad note: Coach House--publishers of such celebrated Canadian
authors as Margaret Atwood, Dany Laferriere, bpNichols and
Ondaatje--announced they are going out of business due to government
cuts to The Arts in Canada, as of the writing of this column).
Ondaatje, while garnering many accolades and awards within Canada,
including The Governor General's Award for Poetry, for his works, "The
Collected Works of Billy the Kid" and "There's a Trick with a Knife
I'm Learning to Do", was not widely known abroad until his 1992 novel,
"The English Patient", won England's prestigious Booker Prize. "The
English Patient's" success has catapulted Ondaatje to global
prominence and given him the larger readership he has long deserved.
It was with "In the Skin", however that Ondaatje masterfully segued
his poetic perceptions into near lyric prose and introduced two of the
main characters who would later appear in "The English Patient",
Patrick Lewis's adoptive daughter Hana and the master thief
Caravaggio. Ondaatje actually subtitled "In the Skin", "A Novel," just
in case there was any doubt in the minds of his readers. Ondaatje
initially started writing the novel about an historic Canadian figure,
the millionaire Ambrose Small, who disappeared along with a million
dollars in 1919. Small turned out to be a less than likable character
to Ondaatje, who decided as a result, to focus the book on the hard
working immigrant underclass of Toronto and the moving characters who
populated it. In doing so, Ondaatje shifted the focus of his novel
from the powerful to the meek and dispossessed. Ambrose Small faded
into the background of the story, becoming one of many interconnected
strands making up the web of the novel, and Patrick Lewis came forward
as the fly in the center of that web.
Patrick Lewis is the tabula rasa upon which the stories in the novel
are painted. And the stories are many, varied and intricate. At times
the stories read like historical fact, and indeed Ondaatje often
supports his fiction with factual source material. But Ondaatje is
also recreating a forgotten history, a history that has for the most
part gone unrecorded. In one powerful scene he lists a series of
companies that provided products for a massive public works project in
Toronto, the companies are real ones, but the names of all the men who
built the project, many who died in the process are not recorded
anywhere in the historical record. Often, "In the Skin" is the story
of these forgotten men and women, Nicholas Temelcoff, the immigrant
daredevil bridge builder, Caravaggio the thief, Cato the anarchist
labour organiser and the three women who help bring Patrick into full
existence as a human.
The female characters of the novel are in many ways the most powerful,
fully actualised individuals. In Alain-Fournier's "The Wanderer",
Meaulnes's love was more an image of female perfection then an actual
being. Ondaatje uses the women, particularly Patrick's lovers, Alice
and Clara in an entirely opposite fashion. Alice and Clara help to
create Patrick, they draw him out of himself and into a world where he
can create his own story and become part of a greater community.
Ironically, Alice and Clara are both actresses, creators of character,
and it is as if part of their ability to create reality through art
are transferred to Patrick. Patrick is drawn into the world of these
women, out of his own solitude, and once within that world, he begins
to realise a greater potential for living and action.
But what, you may ask, is "In the Skin" about? That is a very
difficult question. Some novels defy a brief encapsulation. "In the
Skin" is such a novel. It can be read in many different ways. To an
extent, like "The Wanderer", it is a coming of age novel, a love story
and a tale about the loss of innocence. But more than "The Wanderer",
it questions notions of the how we define the self, and how it is
created. It is also a political novel, with strong post-colonialism
roots, giving a voice to those whom history has relegated to two
dimensional characterizations. "In the Skin" is also an incredibly
beautiful poem. Ondaatje's phenomenal imagistic ability, his deftness
and evocative rendering of gesture, his spare use of only the most
powerful words, gives the novel a liquid flow, like the finest of
poetry, even as the stories within twist and turn.
"Poetry gives off smoke but it doesn't die out. It acts kind of crazy,
flutteringly, when it chooses us."
--Yevgeny Yevtushenko,
"Stolen Apples" (1972)
Both "The Wanderer" and "In the Skin of a Lion" are marked by many
striking differences. Both books have a gentle, poetic quality and a
sensitivity to honest, powerful characters that totally engages the
reader. "The Wanderer", though, is written from a place of greater
innocence than "In the Skin". It is rural and pastoral, and in many
ways impossible to place the setting as twentieth century Europe. All
the conflicts in the novel are emotional and internal. The irony of
the central theme of the work--the loss of innocence--is palpable when
read with history's hindsight. Perhaps Fournier, though never
mentioning it in his novel, sensed the change of the industrial
revolution and the build-up towards war in Europe. If so, "The
Wanderer" then becomes a very subtle eulogy for a lost era, and a
poignant one for a lost author. "In the Skin of a Lion", while dealing
with roughly the same time period, is more a renunciation of the
established history and a eulogy for those history has forgotten.
Alain-Fournier is a romantic writer, his language and tone more a
creation of the nineteenth century than the twentieth, while Ondaatje,
though poetic, couples the romance of his words with a gritty realism,
reminiscent of John Steinbeck. Ondaatje does not shirk from taking
knowledge in the present and superimposing it over the past, to
chastise, to understand and to learn.
These are books to be read in the final days, the denouement of
summer. They deserve to be read slowly, even languorously. Both books
have a hint of magical realism to them, a little bit of enchantment
that flutters at the periphery of vision, making your eye roam
searchingly. "The Wanderer" has quietly stood the test of time, as "In
the Skin of a Lion" is sure to do. You may need to search a little
harder for "The Wanderer"; however, it's most recent edition was
released through a division of Penguin in the 1980's. I have regularly
seen it in better used-book shops and any self respecting library
should be able to get it. "In the Skin of a Lion", with the success of
"The English Patient", should now be widely available. Vintage Canada
has recently re-released it in Canada, so I expect it should be easy
to find in the United States and Europe. If for some reason you can't
find either book...I'll probably lend you my copy.
About the Columnist
*******************
Shaun Armour lives in Toronto, Canada. He is currently in the process
of writing a novel, and likes bowling shirts and has his own pool cue;
alas, he cannot yet eat fifty eggs.
Featured Writer
---------------
Rick Lupert <
[email protected]>
4 poems and an essay
_Dirty Coffee_
I hate drinking coffee in the morning
Because coffee is a dirty drink.
I hate getting dirty in the morning.
The night is for dirt.
I like being dirty at night.
Sitting in the dirty dark,
Surrounded by dirty people,
Thinking dirty thoughts,
Drinking dirty coffee.
I like being dirty at night.
In the morning,
I'd rather have an orange.
_Condoms, Cigarettes, and Vomiting_
Condoms are expensive
but maybe you can split the cost with your sexual partner
Cigarettes are expensive
but maybe you could split the cost with your lungs
But that would be silly
as neither of your lungs have jobs, or vocational training
Maybe you could send your lungs to college
so they could get good jobs
And help to pay for those cigarettes
But that would take too much time
and you can't even afford to send yourself to college
So maybe your lungs could get jobs as waiters or waitresses
But that wouldn't work
because no one wants to be served a slice of quiche by a disembodied
lung,
especially one as charred and black as yours
So maybe you'll have to pay for your cigarettes by yourself
Or maybe you should just quite smoking
as it's the most disgusting thing you can do
Besides perhaps vomiting in public
Though when you think about it,
you realize that smoking can KILL you
Whereas vomiting is cleansing
Then your sexual partner breaks up with you
So you have to pay for your condoms too
Then you go broke and bankrupt
Yes BOTH broke AND bankrupt
Having to buy condoms and cigarettes all the time
And soon you can't even afford those
So you sit around all day
And you spend most of your time vomiting.
_Crossing The Street Is Dangerous_
Crossing the street is dangerous
in your car, on your feet
Crossing the street is dangerous
earthquakes, drive by shootings
Crossing the street is dangerous
debris falling from outer space, smog
Crossing the street is dangerous
spontaneous human combustion, heart failure
Crossing the street is dangerous
wild animals escaped from the zoo, nazis
Crossing the street is dangerous
I just got run over by an ambulance
_Epic Penis Poem_
Let me tell you about my penis.
My penis is an exclusive secret agent of love.
My penis is on the guest list of clubs that I can't get into.
My penis arrives for dinner in a limousine provided by NBC,
while I show up fifteen minutes later in a jalopy.
My penis was invited to be the spokesperson for the
Coca-Cola Corporation.
My penis takes forty-five minute showers by itself.
My penis appeared in several major motion pictures and is currently
bidding for the lead role in the new Oliver Stone film expose of the
Reagan administration.
My penis speaks nine different languages and once negotiated a
non-aggression pact between Ethiopia and a country right next to
Ethiopia.
My penis can fly an airplane and if asked will explain what went wrong
with the ValuJet flight in incredible technical detail.
My penis comes equipped with several pop open compartments in which it
stores a life raft, coffee maker, World Almanac and Book of Facts, hair
care products, several bars of gold bullion, and breath freshener.
My penis once conducted The William Tell Overture, Beethoven's Fifth
Symphony, Also Sprach Zarathustra, and the theme to Star Wars.
Once, while I was away on a business trip, my penis re-arranged all my
furniture, alphabetized my compact discs, and ate my roommates left leg.
My penis disguised itself as Santa Claus and got a job working in a mall
during the holidays.
My penis was invited to the White House for Dinner. I got to go too.
It said right on the invitation "Penis and Guest."
My penis has been used as currency in developing nations.
Sometimes my penis wears sunglasses to lay low and avoid the paparazzi.
My penis spent a year dead for tax purposes.
There will be a test on my penis at the end of the week.
This has been the life story of my penis.
My penis.
Featured Writer Essay
---------------------
And now I shall write the essay which will accompany my poems in their
position in this issue of POETRY INK. I am asked to provide some
insights as to what the poems are about, and perhaps where I am coming
from in having written them. Having put very little thought into this
before, I will now make up some things, and through this process, you
the reader, and I the writer, will discover together whatever it is
that I may have meant when I wrote them. A poem by poem account if you
will. (And I know you will because I overheard you talking about it
earlier.) And now, I shall go off about a few things.
**About Dirty Coffee**
This poem is my response to the great societal addiction to drinking
coffee in the morning. I hate drinking coffee in the morning. The very
idea of using a substance to create a physical reaction (in this case,
caffeine to wake me) makes me Pavlovistically cower in the corner.
(THE corner.) I can't understand people not being able to function
without their first cup as anything else but a compulsive addictive
behavior. (This is only added to by the fact that most people's
morning coffee consists of what I affectionately call "office roast."
This is bad coffee. Bad, bad coffee.) LET THE WORLD KNOW THAT EATING A
GOOD AND HEALTHY BREAKFAST EVERYDAY IS THE KEY TO YOUR SUCCESS DURING
THE DAY. Try an orange. It's for YOU in the morning. It has juice. It
is JUICY. Now. Beyond that, I love coffee. Good coffee. It has to be
good coffee; and the pleasure I derive from sitting in a coffee house
at night drinking this strong, sludgy dirty beverage, banding together
with other people drinking the same...other dirty sludgy people. It
spawns so much creativity...and it is the only thing worse than the
compulsive addictive behavior of drinking coffee in the morning.
**About Condoms, Cigarettes and Vomiting**
This poem is not about working in a restaurant. This is why when I
submitted it a while back to an anthology of poems regarding working
in a restaurant, it was not accepted. Mainly this is about two
things: 1) Smoking is bad, and 2) Sex is good. The vomiting is
incidental. When I wrote this I was dating a woman who smoked and who
required that I use condoms. This poem is about her. She never stopped
smoking and eventually broke up with me. I have some condoms left over
from the relationship. I will be happy to mail them to anyone who
sends me their address. They are kind of old now. But maybe I could
autograph them and you could keep them in a scrapbook. Let me know.
**About Crossing The Street Is Dangerous**
The previous two pieces are older works by me, and this poem, as well
as the next, are fairly newer pieces. In this piece I experiment with
a form of sorts. The repetition of the phrase "Crossing the street is
dangerous" provides a rhythm to the piece, especially when read aloud,
which I have discovered to be an effective technique of gripping an
audience no matter what you are saying. This poem is more an exercise
in this technique than a social commentary of some sort...but it does
paint an absurd picture of our world...with an absurd outcome. My use
of absurdity in my work comes from my love of everything Richard
Brautigan has ever written. I think both this form and absurdity show
up in the next piece as well.
**About Epic Penis Poem**
It seems that my penis has become a recurring character in my poems.
Someone recently commented to me (after having read such a poem) that
it lacked emotion and celebration. He said that I should "Sing a song
of my penis." And so, I strapped on my...guitar, and out come this
piece. It finishes off the creation of my penis as a character and
goes in the most absurd directions possible. Sometimes I sit around
and think of absurd things to think about. This poem is a result of
this too. My mother recently asked me "Rick, are you sexually
frustrated?" I answered her "No, why?" And then she answered "Because
you're always writing about your penis." I tried to explain to her
that it was all a celebration of my penis. But she doesn't understand
my work. The last thing I really want to do is explain my penis to my
mother. So, it's writing a letter to her on its own to try and work
things out.
**On me, otherwise and in general**
I host a weekly open reading at a coffee house here in Los Angeles and
have done so for over two years. I think that reading one's work out
loud to other people is the best way to get feedback on it by gauging
how people react. I also think that once you start going and reading
your work at readings, you will be inspired to write more and more.
Since I started doing this about 4 years ago, I have been fairly
prolific, and have been published several times, in several places.
Also, I recently returned from a trip to Paris out of which came a
book called "Paris: It's The Cheese" which contains poetry written
there, and a cassette called "Paris: It's The Cassette", which
contains sounds, commentary and observations recorded there. In a
couple of days I'm going away to a summer camp for a month. A friend
of mine and fellow poet suggested that I make "Summer Camp: It's The
Cassette". I probably won't do this. But it is an interesting idea.
Please eMail me if you're interested in these things.
My next project may be an anthology of my own work covering the last
several years, or possibly a journal of penis related poetry for which
I would seek submissions from anyone. I do this because I think it
will be entertaining, and also because I like to use the word penis
and submission in the same sentence. Ooh, that's twice.
Also. Guitar playing 27 year old vegetarian Libra with 7 goldfish and
a snail named Phyliss.
Yours,
Rick Lupert 7/18/96
John L. Arnold
--------------
<
[email protected]>
2 poems
_The Big Easy_
Hit New Orleans,
on the back of
a produce truck.
Runaway boy,
Headed straight for,
The Quarter
Smell of light rain,
on Magnolia
Sun struggling
to rise,
after another,
hard night.
Big, fast, river
rushing to its
destiny with the sea.
Little streets with
doors leading to
neglected courtyards.
Dry fountains with
wild flowers growing
out of cracks.
Lots of wrought iron,
losing the eternal
battle with rust.
The fine smell of,
Chicory coffee
and Decadence
in the heavy air.
Hustlers of every type,
and intention.
Living on a Street
named Lust.
Scarlet women,
painted faces and
tired eyes.
Dignity for sale,
on every street corner.
Grifters and drifters,
inhabitants of the
French Quarter
just like the big river,
making little,
eddies and swirls,
on the way to oblivion.
_In The Shadow Of The Red Hawk_
The Red Hawk circles,
long, slow,
sweeping turns,
riding the ocean wind.
Far below,
his shadow
moves over the land.
To the West,
the mighty Pacific,
strikes the land mass
in relentless assault.
Endless lines of
Aquamarine waves,
roll onto the land mass.
Soldiers to the front.
The land rises up,
forming a fortress,
of thousand foot cliffs,
the first line of defense.
The Lords of the forest,
mighty Redwood Trees,
stand, tall and strong,
as if in reserve against,
the onslaught of the sea.
The Red Hawk dives and climbs,
over this mighty battle,
His shadow sweeps across,
black tail deer and grey fox.
Seals and Otters,
jump and play,
in the swirling surf,
unaware of the eternal struggle,
between Land and Sea.
Looking at this Epic scene,
I am able to see myself,
as if in a mirror.
A bit of bone and flesh,
my life and times,
a fleeting moment,
in the natural order of things.
W. Luther Jett
--------------
<
[email protected]>
3 poems
_At The Road's End_
The small house waits
in the center of nothing, lost
amid the fields of corn
with the river somewhere near -
in each white wall,
a window and an open door
let in the light
and the longing
sigh of the restless wind.
And no-one comes here,
and no-one goes,
and the days are all as one
to the little house
of white-washed stone,
and the dust and the rain
are all the same,
and the sound of the river there
is the morning and
the evening prayer.
And far, so far, above, the sky,
spreading its great, pale wings
beyond what any eye
can see, or any heart betray.
_A Simple Hymn_
A flock of wild geese
grazing in the slow rain
beneath great, sad oaks.
The wind at the edge of the sea.
The Shenandoah hills
in autumn, when fire
born of frost kisses
the ancient valleys.
The steel rails keening beneath
iron wheels, and the steam-
whistle calling in the night.
The water and the stars over it.
Laughter that spills out
of a drunken room as I
walk past, like light
from a broken lantern.
The warm curve of your body against mine.
The Chesapeake waters, blue
in the sun, and the white
sands of Chincoteague.
The snows of March,
that come before dawn
and by noon-time
have melted away.
A sky heavy with unshed tears.
Crocuses.
Wild horses on the marsh
beneath an opal moon.
A woman singing in
the afternoon yard,
for no other reason
than that it is afternoon
and she is in the yard.
Your eyes, the time we first met.
The heartbeat
of an unborn child,
the heartbeat
of the Unborn.
_A Dream Of Lodz_
A room of machines, high
above the teeming
cobbled stones - a shaft
of narrow stairs - pushing past
stolid onlookers into
a bookshop where dust-worn
tomes yellow on broken
shelving, to the back room -
the torn screendoor opening -
down the iron fire
escape and onto the pedestrian
bridge - all splintered grey
wood and wire - the bodies
surging across it -
looking for my father -
to find him before I am
Aaron Cary
----------
<
[email protected]>
1 poem
_for hannah_
said the sun sets low
behind westward mountains
new face here
beauty is evident
under moonlit skies
a piece of heaven's near
if i could hold your hand
holding heaven
with a touch so soft
a breeze blows gently
could she be the one
to dissolve al my sorrow
anguish and pain
come, fill my heart
with love so pure
Nancy Depper
------------
<
[email protected]>
1 poem
_Portrait of The Girlfriend of the Artist_
Not me, I'm not
the hand-holder, the
money lender
but it's me he calls
at midnight and I
talk him down;
but he calls.
And I can speak to him;
sometimes, I begged
to be that girl.
He approaches me
like a fighter -
dukes up
all defenses
but no punch in my direction
though I know
those fists are
a shiny bouquet
of blood and face bone.
But he kisses me
and physics take a hike
he is a tempter and
I, in weakness,
imagine his spigot
married to my rise
my ass and his temper -
potential, I think.
We are couple enough
for Chinese food
at midnight but
we wear pants to bed.
But I wake up and
he is kissing me again
just for that moment
then we are back to sleep.
I never know
if he is dreaming
or if I am.
I do not keep secrets well.
He knows my feet
and soft thighs, my
breasts heavy like
potato bread.
And I have felt his thump
of desire press against me
but denied
slow
fast
or furiously.
So instead I
try to see him
as a tooth I had extracted,
a bone I
can do without
(a hole my tongue
cannot resist...)
But he would not
have me;
push does not come to shove.
His kiss is only mime,
a fake and silent motion
that still divines
water to my lips
only now, I dream
of a bad taste in my mouth
and no place
to spit.
Jason Gullion
-------------
[email protected]
1 poem
_King to Pawn_
The mist settles low at the cemetery gates,
pulling the life from my legs.
I turn toward the breakers,
look past the stone markers
as the surf breaks over the graves.
Lives gone remain in this place.
The fog swirls with the salt air,
pulling the breath from my lungs.
The light of warning blinks from the tower.
I drag myself up the twisting staircase,
stumble into the beacon room.
The steward and the cocktail-waitress are there.
Their chess game is set: half-finished.
They both reach for the rook.
It is knocked down and
the light goes out.
Matthew W. Schmeer
------------------
<
[email protected]>
3 poems
_eats_
eating now nothing death
crawls
begging love and cancer
breeding flesh
in a palm extended
nail upward falling
_when she squeezes_
when she squeezes it, it is jelly bursting
because the redness of squeezing is
time passing and no one knows how it goes
i touched the cold hard surface of a sight unseen,
the bone-cold chill like a tongue beneath me.
it shines like the bald-headed bartender at the corner pub,
smells like the time we watched the salmon mate;
and it will happen to me, too,
this languid turning of the plate, because she has said it shall be so.
i call myself by another name;
it is not for your ears to hear nor my lips to say
but if you must know, it is thus:
crisp paper burns chafes scars leaves and then remains yet is
maggot
and she tells her dirties to the young chinese man at the thai diner
and i leave it where it lays, it is unclean
and she is agonized by her fingernails bitten to the quick
and the young chinese man stands in the crowd handing
out samples of peking duck
and i say hello and shake my head in that knowing way that she dislikes
and she is afraid of the young chinese man's mother,
frail in her sarong and crackling with the crinkles of age
nothing makes it fall
and the young chinese man wears a hat
because it is winter
and the sun
does not like him.
i tell him it is not okay for him
due to to the fact that winter has passed,
but he protests too much even in summer
he says it is because this is the way it is done
in san francisco, but the gays have beaten him to it.
he is the black-tanned child of the sand
and his skin is fire on the beach:
my feet stamp him out, and move on.
_Flies_
she calls me and says this is the way it must be.
funky, she
calls it - the phone sweating to ring
and
the night
cutting like
the name of
a rose falling
to violets.
sweet dying sweet dying sweet dying
flower of night
shades drawn shut
to keep out
the
flies.
Shaun Armour
------------
<
[email protected]>
3 poems
_Call It Work_
12:37 A.M.
Queen car, hits air breaks, stops, swallows me up
Connection one made, two more buses and I'm home free, well home at
least
Eleven hours of waiting tables behind
No more "May I recommend the phyllo wrapped escargot served atop a
Red pepper coulis."
Couldn't be servile or civil a minute longer, I'd kill first
Finished my book on the trip to work, so I just stare
Kind of bug eyed and languid
Looking for some inspiration out the window
On these late northern streets
Oscillating between reverie, fatigue and thought
Roll past the hospital, as always a coven of blue smocked
Patients hovers outside
Hooked up to intravenous drips, catheter tubes dangling between bare
knees
Their standing by the emergency ambulance entrance, inhaling desperately
Waiting in the snow flurries ,
For bullet ridden smoking buddies to roll in and join them
Fresh meat for the gossip mill of the diseased and dying
"Folks, may I suggest the hacking lung cancer in a dijon beurre blanc."
I check my smokes to see if I'll get through the night,
And have a couple left for breakfast, damn, running low
The dog lady gets on, draws my attention from the window,
Can't help but notice her
Stick thin, and like a million years old
Dragging a skittish little pup on a choke chain
Weirdest thing, this old woman, always gets on late at night,
Seen her a half dozen times, never the same dog
I don't know where the idea comes from, it just kinda creeps up and
I stare horrified
She's eating the poor damn things, I sense it, I smell it
Like the SPCA is her own personal Meals on Wheels
And I don't know who I feel more sorry for, her or the mutts
"Ma'am, may I recommend the bastard mongrel with a wild mushroom
demi-sauce."
Get off at Broadview, check for my transfer
The bus arrives mercifully quick,
Since the homeboys seem bored of terrorising the graveyard 7-Eleven
clerk,
And appear to be refocusing their malignant attention upon myself
My hand is buried in my pocket gripping my corkscrew and I'm thinking,
"Don't fuck with me guys, I know how to use this thing."
Twist, pull, POP!
I get on the bus and I wonder if those guys know just how close they
came
Short, and thank God, uneventful hop to Kingston Rd.
Run for the my final connection, scream frustrated as it pulls away,
"Fucker!"
Then it stops again, doors open, and shit, I know he heard me
But it's cold and late, and I'm almost too tired to care as I step on
And that bus driver is looking at me like I'm a piece of crap
I mumble a feeble "sorry",
Knowing I've just offered one more reason for him to hate his job
Get off at Main, aim for the fluorescence of the Dip and Sip
Buy a cup of coffee, black, and a pack of du Maurier light, Kings
Swear I'm going to stay up tonight and do some writing
Leave my precious wife sleeping sweet and naked in the next room
Dreaming of the click of computer keys and beautiful stories
Going to pay my artistic dues through exhaustion and lack of spooning
Finally home, strip as I climb the stairs to my flat,
Leave a trail of red wine and food stains rumpled on the floor behind me
Sit before the glowing monitor, in the dark, in my underwear,
Smelling of sweat and restaurant
Wondering just what the hell I'll write about
Man, I'm thinking, this ain't art
But hey, sometimes ya gotta call it work
"Sir, might I recommend the angst and compulsion with a
Mango-pineapple fruit salsa?"
_Infinity Minus One_
Something soft breaks the back of the night
Whirling and withering it's grief
Like the rush of air that leaves the body with the soul
Rises, dissipating as if to nothingness
But it is not nothingness, it is dispersion
It hovers this breath, on unseen eddies of wind and air
Commingling naturally with dying gasps and sobs like pleas
And the first air that replaces the amniotic fluid in the lungs of the
born
It follows currents seemingly random
Yet atoms collide and we know that somehow they have defined themselves
Defined one another,
Not fate, somehow planned with perfect detail
This trickery of nature, quietly ironic
Whispers in the gloaming
Draw near and know what schemes the wind and water and earth have
devised
How we took from ourselves the raw materials
Divined through aeons as the proper tools
To sculpt and harness a spark
From which we brought forth the statue of loneliness
We made you malleable, with will and instinct
Sent you out, prepared only to return to the elements with which
We created you
Our purpose was not progeny or hubris at what we might craft
But simpler and sadder
For the secret of the wind and the water and the earth is the same as
yours
We are isolated within the void
Suspended within nothingness
A universal mobile held together with the faintest strings of gravity
And a prayer for concrescence
With man we sought to know our self
Redefining logic, giving you only a speck of time
To riddle out the conundrum that our eternity makes insoluble
We hoped for you to discover a purpose and a dignity
That we might embrace for our long wait
Instead we have hatched a chain of mysteries
As we watch your minds and hearts fumble with the fabric of yourselves
We welcome your breath back to the wind,
Your tears to the water,
Your bodies to the earth
As only an anguished parent can
Who wonders too late, why they ever let there children go
And sometimes when we have felt too much
The earth grieves in it's own way,
To demand answers,
To let you know that you are not alone
And the one element that may know the truth?
Fire will not talk
_Slow Burn Thunderhead Run_
Forehead pressed against cold glass
Spatter of rain clattering with the wheels over cross tie and track
You asleep in this transitory nuptial den
My hand rests on the swell of your hip, fingertips rising and falling,
With the swell of sleeps breath in your belly
I would watch you in your tranquillity, see your grace,
But God draws my attention,out over the plains,
Where a wall of darkness envelops even the blackness of prairie night
Even within our glass encased Pullman, the suck of
The thunderheads can be felt
Sequestered down some forgotten branch of our nerve endings,
A primal barometer is registering the changes in our atmosphere,
Pressure slips away and you sigh languidly, insinuating your
Air into the night
I light a cigarette, cup the flame, not from the wind outside,
But so as not to startle you within your dreams
I am expectant, like a small boy allowed to stay up too late
To see something special
When it comes I am filled with quiet awe, my cigarette does a slow burn
Between my fingertips, forgotten
Energy, hotter than the surface of the sun, rips the blackness apart
Rips it to tatters
I hear the sky rending, tearing apart it's own hidden seams
An ineffable madman is furiously painting a canvas in silhouetted
blacks and
Brilliant whites, hints of cold blue and ion charged incarnadine
A cacophony of displaced air flooding in to fill it's own void is
His overture.
A holy shiver runs up my spine, the body informs the brain, begs to
Understand
It feels something like love
I see you illuminated by all this in your repose
I gather you into my arms, cradling ever so gently,
Guiding you to this magnificent waking
You slide out of dreams,
I watch the lightning bolts flicker on the liquid surface of your eyes
I feel your breath catch within a swirl of fear , reverence and wonder
You look at me like a child, begging comprehension,
But your gaze returns almost instantly to the window, fixed with mine
Within our berth we pass hours silently watching
Me cheek feels the hairs on your neck, rise and fall with the
Luminous flashes
And I know this night is ours alone
I know that the roll of future thunderheads will bring thoughts of grace
And love
And me.
Thomas Dunnam
-------------
<
[email protected]>
short fiction
_Halfhuman Part 1_
(Traded to Monte 7/13 for an Untitled Thing)
Preliminary findings attendant to a document entailing conspiracy
proceedings initiated against one M. Mouse, to be henceforth referred
to in the body of this piece as THE RODENT, and one Hanuman Honzumon,
to be from this instance on referred to by the improbable moniker HALF
HUMAN, SEMI-DEMI-GOD, IMPERIAL AND AUSTERE PRIMATE.
Background: Due to ontological factors allegorical to a biological
clock panic, the divinity decided all of a sudden SHE wanted children.
Posthaste was accomplished the pregnancy of a human male, the
resulting and unique infant being a half-immortal monkey, namely the
above-mentioned Hanuman, half-human, semi-demi-and-so-on, a. primate.
The aforesaid offspring's consequent and ever-expanding program of
creative destruction in collusion with a startlingly successful
smaller member of the mammal tribe, in truth, a variety of
dehabilitated RAT, whose primary faculties of speech, cognition, et.
al. were in some as of yet not declassified manner artificially
enhanced in the late 1920s at the biotech labs of Cisney Productions
Inc. is the essence of this brief.
Our thesis attempts to map the nature and extent of the intergalactic
intrigue undertaken by this criminal partnership to manipulate the
before-TV-entertainment-viral-happiness-infection industry. Enclosures
include information pertinent to the judge's deliberations on the
cleaning lady's petition to liquidate this squanderdom of species
potential and a stronger, more pleasant ammonia.
Hanuman's e-mail: "To Honzumon, Successful Advice-Giver, Well-Read and
Smallish God: Please be suggestible to our recommendation to please
visualize a future conference with THE RAT (who we refer to as "Black
Buddha," for he is mysterious). Signed, Certain Monks."
Narrative from surveillance: "In consequence of much effort at inner
image-making, monkey god and teacher claims to have received a
visitation, in a third-tier tourist bungalow, of the 'black
bodhisattva's mind'."
Notes from surveillance of aforesaid surveillance: "Our agent from
Planet u.S,f-ak46 (YOURANUS) seems to be completely devoid of family
values and was often seen motorcycling home from a late homoerotic
breakfast with crossdressing members of an as of yet undefined species
of what appear to be walking palm trees."
From the Office of the Director: What are you smoking and you're all
fired.
Letter to the Director, dated Last Monday (sic): "To O.E.K. [read:
'Our Esteemed King'], As you indubitably may or may not recall, we,
your ever-submissive and not-worthy staff, are mainly composed of
ethically challenged ex-Statsi, GPU, NSA, Chilean Armed Forces
intelligence functionaries and their ilk. So would it not seem odd to
Your Majesty if we, of all folks, could not find a sex link between
investigation subjects mouse and monkey-boy? So! Anyway -- we recently
picked up a rogue signal emitted from somebody's microwave in Thailand
about the same time those two unspeakable maledictors were hanging out
there; which, with His Highness's permission, we reprint below:
Short burst from the Director: Permission denied. It's obvious you
guys spend all my treasure surfing the skin pages and we'll never
establish a connection existent between Mickey Mouse and Hanuman
through your fucked-up ramblings-about. By the way, you're all slated
for execution yesterday, so get your dress uniforms dry-cleaned and
report a few hours prior to TAKEOFF to reception at Compound Happyland
(you assholes!).
Northern Thai transmissions (in translation) published in protest of
latest Memo From The Chief: Perfect Woman disrobes in Chiangmai
street lined with Japanese electronics shops and Kentucky Fried
Chickens, takes rod of Mercedes Benz's radio antenna between her
pressed-together breasts in remembrance of the good times immediately
following the chartering of City-State by joint venture between Cisney
Inc. and Indo-European Languages Ltd. As car's tires melt into puddles
of black jelly, and blood runs out tailpipe, Perfect Woman's
attributes of universal compassion and unbeatable charm merge into
substance like thick light radiating atop small cubic platform. The
population ruminates on auto repair as technicians from nearby
agricultural institute arrive to record event on videotape, "if it
will take."
Radio Cisney and The Hanuman Newsletter both carry banner headlines:
(We Did It!). F.R.E.E.D.O.U.G.H., The Directorate's Fact-Gathering ARM
has been exterminated roundly -- or soon will be! Nothing pinned on
yours truly.
Bruce Sherman
-------------
<
[email protected]>
_My Mother's China Shop_
I smashed the front window
of my mother's china shop
crashed through with my body
and my fists flailing
teacups flying
saucers sailing.
I dusted the shelves
in my mother's china shop
carefully lifting each plate
and wiping each vase
replacing the fading flowers.
I swept the aisles
in my mother's china shop
broom handle knocking
priceless teapots off corners
I hid the shards
right where she'd find them.
I left the town
of my mother's china shop
and sent her a letter bomb
in the shape of a heart
it exploded in her face
a thousand pieces.
Now I visit my Mother
in her china shop
and wonder what it is
that draws me here
perhaps the old musty smell
or sweet tea brewed in back.
I want to tell her all
the things I've done and said
But mostly I just sit
smile at her carefully
and drink my tea
from a glued together cup.
Richard Garni
-------------
<
[email protected]>
1 poem
_Life and Crime and Thoughts, Also Hollywood_
I
in the newspaper today, there was an interesting article about
marilyn monroe. in this article it stated that she was concerned
that, while filming the misfits, she had inadvertently
caused the death
of clark gable
by her perpetual
tardiness on the set. recently a seance was conducted to ask clark
gable in person whether or not he thought that it was
her perpetual tardiness
that had caused his death,
sweet death
no, clark gable stated emphatically. I was on a diet, it was very
hot, it was a dumb script, and besides, he said with a wink, it
wasn't her tardiness that caused my heart to beat
no no
it was not
to be
interesting, hm? well, soon enough, I was out of the grocery store
and on to the jeweler. three bums asked me three times for three
sums of money. I said: "no way," because, I said, "I have no money."
and I continued to walk
to
the
jeweler's
II At The Jeweler
before I knew it, I was at the jeweler's. there I compared the size,
cut, and shape of a variety of different
diamonds. then, in a spirit of elan vital, I produced a small ring
from my pocket: a diamond in a horseshoe
setting. "what is to be done?" I asked linda, the jeweler. she told
me that
it is a euro-cut diamond, at least eighty years old. you see the
bottom? they used to cut them like that before they understood how
to cut them to extend the full range of refraction. I would guess it
is a "g" diamond, almost colorless, approximately 3/4-1 carat, and
in rather poor condition. you say it belonged to your grandmother? I
would estimate its value to be about $2000. I don't know, what would
you like to do with it?
it was at that moment that I realized that, outside of the grocer's,
on my way to the jeweler's,
"I had money."
in fact
"I had $2000
in my pocket"
in the shape of a small ring in a horseshoe setting, given to me by
my grandmother, but worth $2000 in any event.
quickly, I walked back to the grocery store. I began to sweat, and
my heart raced. the day was unseasonably hot. I had a terrific pain
in my throat and I almost felt as though I was suffering from
vertigo.
III
I almost felt as though/ I was suffering from vertigo. suddenly I
stopped, as though the traffic light had changed from green to red.
I was still sweating, not quite out of breath: clark gable.
marilyn monroe.
I wondered if anyone would ask marilyn was it guilt
that made you commit
suicide,
sweet, icy-cold
suicide. I doubt it, I thought. but would clark gable? (asked?) but
did clark gable? (had he/would he [ask])? they were or are still
together. (?) they still are together. (...)
on the set of the misfits, while her husband playwright arthur miller
is not looking, clark gable slips something into her hand. the sun
is blazing hot and the horses are restless under the western skies.
she smiles.
of course I am still running. when I find the first bum I tell him
1) "I'm sorry."
moments later, I find the second bum. I tell him
2) "I really did have money."
it is unseasonable hot. and I find the third bum. I feel as though
I reach into my pocket, clutching the jewel box that is eighty years
old. what is to be done? I open it up, with a certain elan and then
3) "you can have this" I tell him
(and put it gently in his hand)
IV
of course, there is
nothing there
to be seen
V
and the light
changes
from red
to green.
brandi berry
------------
<
[email protected]>
3 poems
_fade_
she forgets what obsession is like.
glasses on their shelves gleam out
at her every morning, + call her liar.
night-times, stinking, she grins
jack daniels in the dark, rubs
sour-mash skin over untidy sheets -
and dreams fitfully of houses,
left alone in silvered melancholy;
in the woods, in winter.
she says every morning she will
remember her dreams, and yet
cybelene, driverless, and fat with fear,
she will forget again come evening,
and ask what obsession is like.
all these grey nights keeping her warm
through december, through march.
until, obsessed and reeling, and wide awake
she will go to the old house in the woods
to see the daffodils blooming, in its yard -
she will go, to see them fade.
_undone_
he greets me
outside the airport: i'm fresh out of
baggage claims; he's smiling, friendly,
vanilla-kissed and soft-eyed. i'm tamed
only by my carry-ons and the ugly,
lurid luggage
that i got for christmas last. he's got
the radio tuned to my favorite station and
a list of things not done. five
days, i left; miserable and pink-fatted
like the pork he left out overnight
last saturday, oozing with germs.
and here
there's snow now on heavy bushes; the road
opening up in front of us is grey, and slick,
and it tastes like five days, gone, unchanged;
he greets me with a smile and a list
of things undone. not an hour before now
i was landing, descending through silver smog
to this city, unfamiliar as caracas or prague.
i'm held down by my luggage, and i think:
my connecting flight has ended, time to go home:
home to hugs and i-missed-yous and chocolates,
and things undone.
_bleach_
my cave is not a cave. rather,
it is a place of fat colors,
familiar things, posters of childhood
and letters from girlscouts;
bottle-caps and postcards, all cooled with
the sick scent of sex, tainted with nyquil.
no pirating lovers need dig out treasures here.
my paper valentines, my stolen baubles - they
rest in anonymity, strewn amongst lesser things,
brighter lures, candlelit flowers.
tissue-leaf curtains play hide and seek with
the sun. it always wins, painting my eyes
with blood-vessels and analgesic light, while
my telephone rings and rings, unattended.
my cave is a well-kept cave. i am
in it too much, placing the talismans
of days into their appointed spots,
like mailing labels addressed to no one.
i do not dream, in my cave. there is
evidence of past dreams all around, but
i am annoyed by their fastidiousness,
their seeming lack of dust.
among the flypaper and fingerpaints,
i am ill-suited for sleep. one day soon i will
bleach these walls, leave them bone-white,
and sleep free in nothing but space and
clean air, and the rising heat of summer.
C.A. Culver
-----------
<
[email protected]>
1 poem
_The Wedding_
In a sense, I fought you
from the beginning, battled
that tiny curve at the inside
dimension of your eye
a slight facet
the damaged me
like a chest wound
one bubbled painful breath
after another.
Innocence diminished
to a hazed concept
not worth inking a single sheet
in explanation
a novelty ignored in good conscience
less important than buried oil
before any harnessed explosion.
It's all gone sad now
run to colors picked with love
by a dead woman for her child's room
now peeled to reveal rotting plaster
the bone cover of an architect's
spatial dream.
You took my tools with you
bitter tempered alloys
forgotten pre-mechanical shapes
I am unforged.
Remember my entrance, guileless
and blue
remember the careful geometry
as I washed your back
confine your night thoughts
to your husband
if you dare.
But this cannot be done
for this metaphor is the dark spore
sprouting magnificent
under the marriage bed.
This is either toothsome
or frightening
feast or poison.
Reality was a century
of unmade beds, hot laundry
peppered through and through
with the smells of loud sunrises
bulky reams of Russian authors
the life unread
on shelves we built.
The century smelled of your lover
after an exercise.
The service will be a palliative
a function, mathematically speaking
but a weak plank
the beginning of a warped dock.
Invite the lake inside
taste your fingertips
taste the gathered greyness
implode slowly.
Ever the sun is vibrant
ever the sun is dying.
John Freemyer
-------------
<
[email protected]>
1 poem, 1 short story
_Anagrams of POETRY INK_
poetry ink
poetry kin
inept york
irony kept
perky into
perky not i
perky tin o
perky ton i
perky in to
perky it no
perky on it
poker tiny
print yoke
print key o
token pry i
kent pry i o
kent yip or
kept yin or
kern pity o
kern yip to
kite pry no
kite pry on
knit prey o
knit pyre o
knot prey i
knot pyre i
pent york i
perk tiny o
perk toy in
perk yin to
perk yon it
pert yin ok
pike try no
pike try on
pine try ok
pink rye to
pink yet or
pint key or
pint rye ok
poke try in
pony trek i
pork yen it
pork yet in
port key in
prey ink to
prey kin to
prey kit no
prey kit on
prey tin ok
pyre ink to
pyre kin to
pyre kit no
pyre kit on
pyre tin ok
rent yip ok
rink type o
tiny per ok
tiny rep ok
trek yip no
trek yip on
trip key no
trip key on
trip yen ok
type ink or
type irk no
type irk on
type kin or
york pen it
york pet in
ike not pry
ike pry ton
ink opt rye
ink per toy
ink pot rye
ink pro yet
ink pry toe
ink rep toy
ink rye top
irk opt yen
irk pen toy
irk pet yon
irk pot yen
irk top yen
key nip rot
key nor pit
key nor tip
key not rip
key pin rot
key pro tin
key rip ton
kin opt rye
kin per toy
kin pot rye
kin pro yet
kin pry toe
kin rep toy
kin rye top
kit one pry
kit per yon
kit pro yen
kit rep yon
net pry ok i
pen try ok i
_Making Grandpa Happy_
The hooker stepped out her apartment door and Linda followed down the
sidewalk.
"I'll pay you a lot of money," Linda said, breathless, catching up
with her.
"But I already told you," said the hooker, "I don't do women. There's
other girls who do it. I don't!"
"No. You don't understand. I'll pay you a lot of money if you'll help
me look like you."
The hooker stopped walking. She looked carefully at Linda for a moment
then stepped under an awning to shade herself from the blazing
afternoon sun.
"Why the hell do you want to look like me?" Suddenly, quickly, she
reached out her left hand and pressed Linda's crotch through her blue
jeans.
Linda leaped back. "What was that for?"
"Just checking."
"Why?"
"You're already a woman. What d'you need me for? Just put on some
makeup, get a sexy dress. You'll look all right."
"You don't get it, do you!"
"I do. You're going to a costume party, right? You wanna look like a
hooker to impress your boyfriend. It's gotta be that kinda bullshit."
Linda took a deep breath and nervously fanned her face. "It's nothing
like you think." She ducked under the awning and stepped backward
until her shoulder touched brick. "You've probably seen my grandfather
around here. He's the old man who you never see without his cowboy
hat. Well, see, he's got Alzheimer's disease. It's really a terrible
disease, you know. He doesn't know what the heck he's doing. He hits
me or beats me every night. It would kill him if I hit him back. He's
so weak. I don't want to hit him back. He's my grandpa. You don't hit
your grandpa."
"But he's your problem. He's no problem of mine."
"But you look so sexy," Linda said, fanning very quickly. "Can't you
help me?"
The woman put her hands on her hips and frowned. "You askin' for a
date?"
"Why would I want a date with you?"
"Forget it. Just leave me alone." The hooker walked off as a gathering
crowd scrutinized Linda.
Linda was crying as she hurried to walk in step again with the hooker.
"Listen to me, please. My grandfather won't hurt me if I look like
you. Don't you get it? He wouldn't hurt a sexy woman. He used to spend
all his time around here until he became too weak. This has been going
on for years and years. I moved in with him and Grandma when my mom
died and now I take care of him because he's sick."
"Why d'you wanna look like me?"
"I know it sounds crazy and sexist, but my grandfather hates me
because I'm plain looking. As you can see, I'm not exciting looking.
He loves hookers, like you. You must have seen him!"
"Nobody wears a cowboy hat around here."
"But HE does! I just told you HE does!" Tears twisted down her cheeks.
"Stop crying. Listen, I'm sorry about you and your grandpa. But I
still don't know why you're bothering me about a fuckin' makeover."
"I'll pay you two hundred dollars to help me. All you have to do is
make me look sexy. You don't usually get paid two hundred dollars, do
you? Just show me how to look like a sexy woman."
At first the hooker said nothing. Linda was relieved when she finally
nodded.
"You'll do it?"
The woman stepped back and looked Linda over. "I can make you look
hotter, but I don't know about making you look like me. You're kind of
cute with them cheekbones of yours. You gotta show me money, though.
You got two hundred dollars?"
"I promise I do. Can you make me look sexy?"
"First thing is, you gotta wear lipstick," said the hooker, strutting
off down the street. "A girl needs to wear lipstick. It's more
important than the shoes you wear."
"I've never worn makeup."
"Then you never lived."
"I'm happy."
"Uh-huh. You got a boyfriend?"
"I'm not interested in boyfriends."
"You got a girlfriend?"
"I don't have any friends."
"I believe it. What's your name, honey?"
"Linda."
"I'm Abigail."
"Nice to meet you," Linda said.
Inside Alfredo's Xotic Salon, Abigail guided Linda through a maze of
racked costumes and boxes overflowing with sweat-stained secondhand
lingerie. Then she pulled Linda aside.
"You owe me two hundred dollars."
Wedged in the shadows between two clothing racks, Linda wondered
whether the hooker carried a knife or pistol. Probably both. She
shuffled backwards into a wall of garish costumes, nearly falling.
"You haven't done anything for me yet. Why should I pay you now?"
"The thing is...you know...and I mean this...you need to pay me now."
"This place is kind of weird. I don't think I like it."
"I'm not doing nothin' till you pay."
Linda dug into her pocket and brought out a wad of five twenty-dollar
bills. "I'll give you one hundred now and--"
"I want two hundred."
Linda fanned her face. "This is my grandpa's money. He might need it
for medicine. I'll give you two hundred when we're finished."
"I'll fix you up with one outfit for one hundred." Abigail looked at
her watch. "You've already wasted ten of my precious minutes. Let's
go." Abigail whirled around and walked off between the towering racks.
Linda appreciated the exaggerated squiggle in the woman's butt and
tried squiggling her own butt a little with each step. She felt
ridiculous and hoped no one was watching.
"You can buy your red lipstick at any drug store," Abigail told Linda
as they walked out into the store's showroom. "But you can't get these
kinda clothes anywhere else. They got good wigs, too. You need one."
"Red lipstick," Linda said, making a mental note. "I've seen it in the
grocery store. Is it OK to buy it in the grocery store instead of the
drug store? I don't usually go into the drug store unless I'm shopping
with my--"
Abigail slapped her hand on a glass tabletop. "Jesus! You're really a
weird fuck, aren't you! Of course you can! Buy it anywhere, goddamn
it!"
"I didn't know. Sorry," Linda said. Then she asked, "Abigail, do you
think maybe you could buy it for me? I'll pay you extra."
"Forget it. Buy it yourself. Just try this on." Abigail yanked a
glittering red dress off a hanger and threw it behind her. Linda
caught the costume before it hit the floor. The cloth smelled awful. A
whore wore this and returned it, Linda thought. It smells like sweat
and cigarettes and liquor. I like this smell.
"Where's the changing room?" Linda asked, glancing into the shadows of
the cluttered room.
"Put it on here."
"Where?"
Abigail grabbed Linda by both wrists and dragged her across the room.
"I'm losing my temper with you, damn it . No wonder you don't got
friends!"
"You're hurting me."
"Take off your clothes. Put them on the chair. Try on this dress. I'm
outta here in five minutes."
At home, later that evening, Linda stood in the kitchen, draping her
jeans over the back of the kitchen chair. Then she slid into her
costume.
Reflected in the chrome toaster on the kitchen table, she watched
herself metamorphose. She trembled with excitement while rolling
shimmering nylons up her first-time shaved legs. I'm becoming a sex
goddess. A sexually attractive woman.
She fluffed the wig, sprayed it in place, and painted her lips with
the reddest lipstick they sold at Thrifty Mart. Redder than Abigail
had worn.
The red dress fit tightly over a bra augmented with toilet paper. The
red shoes were tight. Linda practiced walking, all the time watching
her reflection in the toaster. I'm different. I'm a different person.
It surprised her to see how much she resembled her mother. Mother had
been so glamorous. Linda never imagined...
She felt an unusual warmth in her stomach.
Smiling cheerfully, Linda stepped out into the living room.
Stretched out on the sofa, his facial muscles relaxed, Linda's
grandfather looked much younger than he had in the morning. He
appeared to grin because his large false teeth peeked out from behind
dry lips.
He's dreaming about a woman who looks like me. He won't hit me. He'll
be nice. Men slobber over tramps like me.
She switched off the television. In the convex glass of the blackened
picture tube, Linda caught her reflection. Reflected in the distorting
glass, she appeared to stand twenty feet tall.
She looked at the shoes first, the high heels. She flexed her ankle
and studied the exquisite lines created by her feet in the shoes. Then
she stepped back and studied her long legs, her short dress, her bare
shoulders.
He won't dare hit me. I'm gorgeous. A sexually attractive woman.
"Grandpa?" She nudged her grandfather's shoulder. Grandpa's upper
teeth slipped out and rolled down onto the cushion. The old man didn't
seem to be breathing.
Linda kneeled and put her ear to grandfather's fragile chest. "Feisty
little whore!" Grandfather shouted, pushing Linda away. "Probably
filched my wallet while I was sleeping."
Linda stood back, allowing her grandfather to get a good look at her.
"Where the hell's my hat? Did you filch my hat, baby? I ain't payin'
if you filched my hat!" The old man fell back on the sofa.
"Papa, do you know who I am? I'm Annie. I'm your daughter."
Linda waited for a response. After a minute, she sat in the
overstuffed chair across the room and watched Grandpa die. After two
or three minutes, Linda went to the sofa and sat next to him and
checked the old man's pulse to be sure.
Linda leaned down and kissed her grandfather. As she pulled away, she
noticed the stain of her lipstick on grandfather's lips. Linda kissed
him again. Another stain had been painted on Grandpa's lips. Linda
thought it looked cute. She felt sexy. Planting her sexy red lipstick
on grandpa's face made Linda feel naughty and powerful. She suspected
her kisses might bring Grandpa back to life.
She stood and walked into the kitchen. Sitting next to the toaster,
she lifted the phone and dialed 911. The woman said an ambulance would
arrive in two minutes.
Reflected in the toaster, Linda thought she looked very sexy. She
crossed her legs and considered her red shoes and the exquisitely
sculptured curves of her feet. She felt beautiful but she pulled off
the wig, changed back into jeans and t-shirt, and wiped her lips with
a paper napkin. Then she went back into the living room. There had
been no resurrection.
She wiped the kisses from her grandfather's face. And Linda ate the
stained lipstick napkin and fell to her knees in prayer.
About the Contributors
----------------------
Rick Lupert has hosted a weekly open reading in the Los Angeles area
for two and a half years, has read as a featured reader all over Los
Angeles (including at Lollapalooza), has been published several times,
and feels that full frontal nudity is the direction that this nation
should head in. And he does mean head.
John L. Arnold lives in San Francisco, California and is employed as a
tour guide for the Great Pacific Tour Company. His work has appeared
in five issues of POETRY INK.
W. Luther Jett has spent the past twenty-odd years in search of an
answer to the question: "Why?" or more properly: "Who?". He has had
variations on this question published in various magazines, including
"Salon", "tomorrow magazine", "Liberty", "Syncopated City" and others,
with further variations forthcoming in "Synaesthetic" and "Tales of
the Stranger's Cafe". His work has also appeared in past issues of
POETRY INK, and in "Afternoon", a journal published on the World Wide
Web.
Aaron Cary is a student at Columbine High School in Denver, Colorado.
He has had one poem published in a local newsletter and nothing more.
His hobbies include playing computer games on his Mac, repelling, and
mountain biking.
Nancy Depper is a San Francisco poet and the author of three chapbooks
of poetry including "Bodies of Work" on manic d press, and the
recently self-published "Mouthing". Her work has been in many
anthologies including "The Berkeley Poetry Review", and in several
U.S. and British disability arts journals. She is active in the
disability rights movement as well as the Bay Area poetry scene, and
was a member of the 1993 San Francisco Poetry Slam team.
Jason Gullion lives in San Francisco, California. He tries not to
spend his life tinkering with computers, but at least gets paid for
it. He writes poetry and short stories. He loves photography, wine,
beer (good beer) and skiing - probably in that order.
Matthew W. Schmeer is the editor and publisher of this little magazine
and likes to entertain his ego by occasionally including some of his
poetic work in these pages.
Shaun Armour is one of POETRY INK's literary correspondents. His
poetic works have appeared in past issues of this magazine.
Thomas Dunnam has been living and working in Japan for the last five
years as a language consultant in Tokyo schools and companies. Before
that, he was a public high school teacher in Dayton, Ohio. He was also
a staff writer for a "Tokyo City Life" magazine, which "went under" in
February 1996. Lately he's been experimenting with PlainTalk
Text-to-Speech on the Macintosh and the works of Charles Bukowski and
William S. Burroughs.
Bruce Sherman works as an operating engineer on a merchant ship when
he is not writing poetry or taking long-distance bicycle rides. He has
been published in his union newspaper, in a book about poetry writing
published by Harper Collins, and in several other publications.
Richard "Ricky" Garni is a writer and fourth grade teacher presently
at work on a grant to complete a travelogue to the desert resort of 29
Palms, California. He has published poetry and prose in the following
obscure publications: "No Exit", "Tight", "Poetry Motel", "The
Quarterly", "Podunk Review", and others. In addition, he has
completed three little book manuscripts to date: "Michelle",
"Peppermint", and "Soft White".
brandi berry, a 23 year-old poet, spends her days working in the
conventions department of an educational association in Washington,
D.C. Currently, she has only edited or published in various college
literary magazines (due to the various colleges she's attended) but
hopes to begin self-publishing via web soon. She is working towards a
degree in computer science because programming also has a beautiful
sound to it when read.
C.A. Culver lives and works in Minneapolis, Minnesota and has been
previously published in "Matchstick", "Muddy River Poetry Review", and
a local Minneapolis magazine called "WormBlower".
John Freemyer is the Honorary Editor Emeritus of POETRY INK. John
lives in Redding, California, where he isn't writing much this summer
because his children are bored with their summer vacation.
Calvin Xavier is one cool cat. He will be appearing soon at a theater
near you.
Writing Rant
------------
by Calvin Xavier
**Slamming the Open Mike**
I am probably going to piss off a few people and generate a lot of
eMail to POETRY INK with the next two sentences, but I am going to
risk it anyway. Poetry is not poetry if it does not "hold up" on the
page as it does on stage. And while poetry makes good therapy, in most
cases therapy does not make good poetry.
What I mean is that the current state of audience participatory poetry
readings does not generate very much "real" poetry. True, these events
create a lot of disjointed words and sentences and even convey some
emotion. But poetry is not merely verbal communication shouted into a
microphone at the local campus coffeehouse. Most poetry read at these
events is not poetry at all; the poems aren't authentic, but merely
hip and glib. Most of the folks there are writing to get a laugh for a
clever line or twist of phrase or even (in most cases) just to feed
their egos. Or maybe one of their friends bought them enough drinks to
get them to the point where they have shed any self-doubt and are
swaggering with bravado when they hit the stage and read aloud their
poem about watching a dog get hit by a car and suddenly find they
can't pronounce the word "coupe" without actually pronouncing the "e"
(alright, alright, that was me at my first open mike during my
freshman year of college so many years ago). But of course, there are
always exceptions; once in a great while you find a poet who knows
his/her stuff and wows the audience over. And there are three reasons
for this: practice, practice, and practice.
Poetry is a craft, and a craft takes practice and skill to perfect.
The common theory is that poetry is, above all else, the conveyance of
emotion using the written word. Coleridge's perception that poetry is
"emotion recollected in tranquility" is close to the mark -- but I
believe there is nothing tranquil about writing. It is a difficult,
demanding, pain-in-the-ass addiction that poets do because if they
don't, they are nothing. They do not exist if they do not write. I
can't tell you how many times I have faced a blank page (which really
shouldn't happen, because as Charles Bukowski once noted, "real
writers don't get writer's block") only to start writing about the
fact that I don't know what to write about or even gone to the
opposite extreme of crossing out twenty pages of stuff written on a
four a.m. coffee high after my wife and I had an argument regarding
whether or not the cat should be put to sleep because he won't stop
pissing on the blankets and rugs and then I stop and I think, "hey,
get a clue -- it's only writing and no one's gonna know that what you
write is complete crap unless you show it to somebody and then you can
always say that they just 'don't get it' because you are 'writing over
their heads'." And then you have to consider the fact that most poets
don't write for an audience anyhow -- which is how it should be.
Basically, writing is like taking a shit: you really don't want anyone
around just in case what comes out really stinks.
There ~is~ a reason I bring this up. For the most part, you don't hear
traditional formulaic verse read at a Poetry Open Mike Night.
I mean, come on: when was the last time someone read a sonnet as their
entry at the most recent "slam" you attended? Everybody seems content
to just vomit words on a page without any real cohesiveness and then
defend it as "eclectic", "avant garde", or even worse, "post-modern".
Now I don't know about you, but when I read something - especially
poetry - I want some sense of meaning and emotion to be conveyed. And
emotion on a page does not come about by some zit-faced bleached
blonde dressed in black shouting the phrase "pussy whipped cheese
Dorito" after smoking one too many clove cigarettes. I'm sorry, but it
just doesn't work that way.
Now the problem is that not enough folks who pretend themselves poets
have read the classics (and this is probably the fault of the United
States's lousy public education system, as is the burgeoning teen
pregnancy rate, the failure of the War on Drugs, and the reason for
Dwight Strawberry's slumping pitching career [as if you really think
he'll last with the New York Yankees]). And it is also the fault of
creative writing professors and teachers who don't require students to
read great/classic poetic works before they encourage those same said
students to put a pen to paper and "write what they feel". I have an
idea, Tonto: why don't we teach kids **how** to write poetry before we
set them loose to overwhelm us with too many pages full of half-assed
love droolings and angst-ridden waste? You can teach third and fourth
graders more about poetry than you can a bunch of Maggie Espy wanabes.
Just ask any poet working in a "Poetry In the Schools" program --
young kids pick up the nuances of poetry's honesty.
Now I happen to believe that the the ultimate free verse composition
is Walt Whitman's _Song of Myself_ in "Leaves of Grass". In fact, Old
Uncle Walt writes free verse so good that he makes free verse look
easy enough for everybody and their brother to write. The problem is
that free verse is not entirely free; the best free verse appears
"free" when it is in fact built not upon meter and end rhyme, but upon
other linguistic and grammatical features that do not reveal
themselves to the scanning eye, but instead to the attentive ear.
~Free verse takes practice to perfect.~ You cannot slap a bunch of
words on the page and call it poetry, even if you buy one of those
**Magnetic Poetry** kits for $20 and spend the next week standing in
front of your refrigerator playing with the tiles. At most, you are
doing a writing exercise; at worst, you are wasting what little
precious time you have left on this planet.
So here's two suggestions:
1) Go to your local bookshop and pick up a copy of John Hollander's
"Rhyme's Reason" (about $7 the last time I checked) and Richard Hugo's
"The Triggering Town" (ditto). Combined, these books will give you all
you need to know about "the basics" regarding the craft of writing not
only free verse, but traditional formulaic verse as well. Read them
cover to cover. Treat them as as if they were the Sacred Texts of the
Writing Cult.
2) The next time you feel like writing, put down the goddamn pen, turn
off the fucking computer, and pick up a book of poetry. Read a few
poems and see if you have the desire to write. If you do, great, go
for it. But do us all a favor and don't forget to wipe when you're
done.
Submission Information
----------------------
POETRY INK is a free electronic literary journal written by and for
writers and poets with access to the burgeoning global community known
as the Internet. Rather than existing solely on the World Wide Web
(that part of the Internet getting all the media attention nowadays),
POETRY INK is designed to be downloaded to your computer and read
off-line. We encourage you to share POETRY INK with your friends,
family, classmates, and coworkers.
Since we are a free publication, our contributors acknowledge that the
only compensation due to them is the right to access a copy of the
issue of POETRY INK in which their work appears. Because POETRY INK is
found on America Online, CompuServe, and other various online services
- as well as our own World Wide Web home page - we do not anticipate
access difficulties. We regret that we cannot provide so-called "hard"
paper copies; if you desire a "hard" copy, you will need to download
POETRY INK and print a copy on your own printer.
POETRY INK accepts submissions on a per-issue basis, with each issue
published on a bi-monthly schedule for a total of six issues per
calendar year. Generally, each issue is uploaded and eMailed to
subscribers and contributors on the fifteenth of every other month
(April 15, June 15, etc.). We do not send rejection letters; if your
submission has been accepted for publication, you will be notified by
eMail within one week of sending in your submission (or within two
weeks if you sent your submission via snail mail).
Our Submission Guidelines
-------------------------
* Your name, eMail address, physical (snail mail) address, and
telephone number must appear on each submission. Your name and eMail
address will appear on any published work; the remainder of this
information is only for our files and will not be released. You may
omit including your telephone number if you are uncomfortable
disclosing this information; however, please realize this means that
if we need to reach you immediately regarding your submission, your
submission might be excluded from inclusion.
* Electronic submissions should be submitted as either plain ASCII
eMail files (where you type the submission in the body of your
message), or as BinHex 4.0 (.hqx) file attachments. BinHexed files
should be in plain text format (the kind produced by SimpleText on the
Macintosh and WinWrite on Wintel machines). Regardless of submission
format, please use the subject line "SUBMIT POETRY INK: your real
name" where **your real name** is your actual name and not the name of
your eMail account. For example, it should look like this:
SUBMIT POETRY INK: John Q. Public
* Please keep poems under 3 printed pages apiece (page size = 8" x 11"
page with 1" margins printed with Times 12-point plain font). Please
limit short stories to under 5000 words.
* Please limit submissions to no more than 5 poems or 2 short stories
per person per issue.
* Simultaneous submissions are okay, but please contact us if your
work is accepted by another publication so that we may remove the work
in question from consideration. No previously published work may be
submitted.
* Please include a short biographical sketch (3 to 5 lines) with your
submission; if your work is selected for publication, this bio will be
included in our "About the Contributors" section.
(These submission guidelines are an abbreviated version of our
complete guidelines; all submissions are subject to the guidelines
outlined therein. For a copy of our complete submission guidelines,
send a request to our eMail address.)
Spill The Ink!
--------------
Spill the Ink! Read POETRY INK, the electronic literary magazine! For
details and complete submission guidelines, eMail us at
<
[email protected]> with the subject line "SG Request."
Come visit us on the World Wide Web! Point your browser to this URL:
<
http://atlantis.austin.apple.com/people.pages/wayneb/PoetryInk.html>