The Little Purple Notebook On How To Escape From This Universe
                       Copyleft � 1998 by Maximilian J. Sandor, Ph.D.
                   Subscription Information: Maria Loren [email protected]
                        Website: http://transmillennium.net/pnohteftu/



  The Devastating Mistranslations of dukkha

Few alterations of Gotamo's original message have caused as much damage as
the (mis)translations of the Pali word dukkha.

The combined net result of out-of-context quotes and inappropriate
labelling is that the bottomline of  'Buddhism' is being equated with the
statement 'all life is suffering' for the majority of people. It does not
require a vast amount of knowledge about Gotamo's teachings or on the
subject of the human mind in general in order to recognize how an opinion
such as 'all life is suffering' can act as a self-fulfilling prophecy and
have devastating consequences.

Both super- and subconscious minds are taking statements that are
formulated as commands literally and will execute them once they have
entered the system through the conscious mind:

  * the subconscious mind will obey the command directly in form of
    sickness and body problems in general and indirectly by gravitating
    towards physical situations that contain pain or discomfort
  * the superconscious mind will implement the command in three steps: it
    adopts the viewpoint (such as 'all life is suffering') and if a
    situation arises that does in fact contain suffering, it will
    strengthen the viewpoint. After repeated impressions of this kind, the
    superconscious will then decide that 'life is indeed suffering'. Now,
    if life does not give reason for suffering already, the superconscious
    will postulate the occurence of suffering in the future.

Once having entered the sub- and superconscious parts of the mind of a
being, several things will happen if no further actions are taken:


  * passive circuits will be created by the subconscious mind to automate
    the identification that goes along with the statement  'all life is
    suffering',
  * entities will attach to those passive circuits that are loaded or
    primed with mini-postulates containing the self-defeating statement,
    thus creating 'active' circuits,
  * the active circuits (entities) will propagate in one of two ways:
    cloning or jumping ships to other circuits whether on the same bearer
    or another being or entity,
  * the active circuits will integrate into clusters (or entity
    mini-organizations) within which they are now even further hidden from
    direct inspections of the conscious mind,
  * the superconscious mind may duplicate the content of the circuit onto
    a higher level of organization, for example, from individual to
    his/her family, from there to the city, and, in more cases than it is
    commonly recognized or acknowledged, to entire nations or ethnic
    groups (cp.  316. Group Identities).

This way, entire populations have rushed into self-destruction, dragging
with them millions of beings, human and animals alike.

The 'cause' will always be blamed on whoever happens to be on the other
side of the incident that has been postulated, provoked, or 'pulled in',
thus strengthening the 'victim' viewpoint and in the wake lowering
responsibility.

There are several vicious features of this trap in which a Being can easily
be caught when going on this route to disaster, some of which are:


  * in a condition of suffering, the Being is much less able to work on
    its liberation and therefore,
  * as a side effect it will not confront nor successfully resolve
    traumatic incidents from the past;
  * this trap will enter a downward spiral rather quickly, making it more
    difficult to escape with every turn;
  * other beings and super-beings ('nature') can recognize the condition
    on the superconscious or group level and either contribute (resulting
    in more suffering) or dissociate (refusing to help);
  * the person will be unable to use the 'meditation path' correctly
    (which is usually sold as _the_ way of the 'Buddha', and then also as
    the _only_ way) because the person cannot completely enter the first
    of the four wholesome states of the mind which is 'sharing love' or
    'metta'. It will further merge its _own_ suffering within the second
    state of the mind ('compassion'), thus likely to _increase_ suffering
    of others in general rather than to _heal_, and it can certainly not
    properly enter the third state ('sharing joy').  How could someone who
    thinks 'all life is suffering' share joy with others in a
    non-discriminating attitude? Lastly, the forth state of the four
    wholesome (most often called 'noble') states of the mind, the state of
    equanimity, a lower harmonic of nibbaana or the 'complete liberation',
    is beyond their reach, too, because it is a level that is properly
    reached only in progression after passing through the first three
    states. (The four states of the mind will be explained in another
    chapter). Usually, the person will justify this failure and replace
    the proper state of the mind with emotional (body) states which in the
    later case will be close to 'dullness' or 'no-interest', thus adding
    to the motion of the downward spiral of the trap.

One could write a book of hundreds of pages explaining why translating
dukkha as 'suffering' is a fatal mistake.  One could add a couple of
hundred pages with examples of how 'happiness is achieved through
happiness' which Gotamo was reported to have presented to his audience.

The bottom line is that the complete 'truth of dukkha', the first of the
four 'noble truth', can only properly be recognized in a liberated state.
But then, it should be considered that by recognizing a condition 'as it
is'  the condition is automatically resolved ('as-ised').

In this notebook, dukkha will be left mostly untranslated. A close English
description in a modern context would be the concept of 'case', a wording
that is not too widespread, however. Throughout this book one could safely
use the word 'dukkha' whenever the word 'case' has been used.

The word 'in-sanity' would also be an acceptable choice in many cases
because it maintains the original structure of the compound word dukkha
which literally means 'not wholesome'.

How did the translation 'suffering' enter the scene?  'Suffering' is a
consequence of dukkha in very much the same way that 'case' or 'in-sanity'
is the cause of the problems that a person has in life.

A person has to realize that it has 'case' before it can do something about
it. This is a modern phrasing of the 'first noble truth: the truth of
dukkha'. In order to do something about 'case', it has to be understood how
it came about in the first place and how it continues to be created. This
is obviously the 'second noble truth' of Gotamo. The third one is the truth
about resolving 'case', or 'the truth of resolving dukkha'. This is the
basic possibility of  what is nowadays called 'clearing' or 'processing'.
The forth truth, the 'path to resolving case (dukkha)', would be called
'applied technology' in modern words.

In any case, to close this sad chapter of the notebook with a more positive
note, here is  a quote from the Pali Canon about a liberated person:


    "Whatever had to be done was done.
    Whatever could be enjoyed has been enjoyed.
    Happiness was achieved through happiness."
                                                         (Theraaghata 63b)






------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Copyleft � 1998 by Maximilian J. Sandor, Ph.D.

You are viewing proxied material from infinitelyremote.com. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.