PRIVACY Forum Digest Tuesday, 8 February 1994 Volume 03 : Issue 03

PRIVACY Forum Digest Tuesday, 8 February 1994 Volume 03 : Issue 03

Moderated by Lauren Weinstein ([email protected])
Vortex Technology, Woodland Hills, CA, U.S.A.

===== PRIVACY FORUM =====

The PRIVACY Forum digest is supported in part by the
ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy.

CONTENTS
The CERT advisory regarding Internet security
(Lauren Weinstein; PRIVACY Forum Moderator)
Crypto Experts Oppose Clipper (Dave Banisar)
Cryptography: Policy and Technology Trends
(Lance J. Hoffman)
Personal Information Via the Internet (Diane Barlow Close)
EFF Wants You (to add your voice to the crypto fight!)
(Stanton McCandlish)
Campaign Against Clipper (Dave Banisar)
CFP'94 (Lance J. Hoffman)

*** Please include a RELEVANT "Subject:" line on all submissions! ***
*** Submissions without them may be ignored! ***

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Internet PRIVACY Forum is a moderated digest for the discussion and
analysis of issues relating to the general topic of privacy (both personal
and collective) in the "information age" of the 1990's and beyond. The
moderator will choose submissions for inclusion based on their relevance and
content. Submissions will not be routinely acknowledged.

ALL submissions should be addressed to "[email protected]" and must have
RELEVANT "Subject:" lines; submissions without appropriate and relevant
"Subject:" lines may be ignored. Excessive "signatures" on submissions are
subject to editing. Subscriptions are by an automatic "listserv" system; for
subscription information, please send a message consisting of the word
"help" (quotes not included) in the BODY of a message to:
"[email protected]". Mailing list problems should be reported to
"[email protected]". All submissions included in this digest represent
the views of the individual authors and all submissions will be considered
to be distributable without limitations.

The PRIVACY Forum archive, including all issues of the digest and all
related materials, is available via anonymous FTP from site "ftp.vortex.com",
in the "/privacy" directory. Use the FTP login "ftp" or "anonymous", and
enter your e-mail address as the password. The typical "README" and "INDEX"
files are available to guide you through the files available for FTP
access. PRIVACY Forum materials may also be obtained automatically via
e-mail through the listserv system. Please follow the instructions above
for getting the listserv "help" information, which includes details
regarding the "index" and "get" listserv commands, which are used to access
the PRIVACY Forum archive. All PRIVACY Forum materials are also
available through the Internet Gopher system via a gopher server on
site "gopher.vortex.com".

For information regarding the availability of this digest via FAX, please
send an inquiry to [email protected], call (818) 225-2800, or FAX
to (818) 225-7203.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

VOLUME 03, ISSUE 03

Quote for the day:

"In every job that must be done,
There is an element of fun!
You find the fun, and snap [SNAP!],
The job's a game!"

-- Mary Poppins (Julie Andrews)
"Mary Poppins" (1964)

=============================================================================
|
| Thanks to everyone who has been asking about the situation here since the
| quake (the site is only about 5 miles from the epicenter and took a good
| hit), and sorry for the delay since the last digest. While the systems were
| nominally back up late the day of the quake, it has taken awhile to sort
| through everything to get back to normal digest distributions.
|
| With riots, fires, earthquakes, and now, mud in some areas, folks around
| L.A. may be starting to watch out for locusts (actually, the "killer" bees
| are supposedly on the way...) but at least it doesn't get too cold--and
| certainly it's never boring! If nothing else, those aftershocks keep you
| on your toes!
|
| Thanks again for the notes of concern.
|
| Still rockin' and rollin'...
|
| --Lauren--
|
| P.S. A number of essentially "anti-Clipper" submissions have been
| received recently and are in this issue of the digest.
| As always, I'd like to remind the readership that discussion of
| *both* sides of these issues is invited, encouraged, and extremely
| important! Don't feel that you have to hold a particularly
| "popular" point of view to submit articles on a topic!
|
=============================================================================

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 8 Feb 94 18:04 PST
From: [email protected] (Lauren Weinstein; PRIVACY Forum Moderator)
Subject: The CERT advisory regarding Internet security

Greetings. As many or most of you probably know by now, there was within
the last few days a rather detailed advisory from CERT regarding attacks on
Internet systems via persons exploiting any available access to promiscuous
ethernet interface device nodes.

I am not going to repeat the bulletin here, since it is quite lengthy
and available from many other sources. Many system administrators
have long been aware of the vulnerability of such nodes, and have
long since taken steps to remove or protect them. Of course,
the security of systems is only as good as the weakest elements,
and a system where outsiders can achieve privileged access, and so
make use of promiscuous interfaces to monitor plaintext traffic between
other nodes in the domain, is obviously going to have problems.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist (computer scientist? brain surgeon?)
to anticipate this kind of problem...

--Lauren--

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 24 Jan 1994 17:59:34 EST
From: Dave Banisar <[email protected]>
Subject: Crypto Experts Oppose Clipper

More than three dozen of the nation's leading cryptographers,
computer security specialists and privacy experts today urged
President Clinton to abandon the controversial Clipper encryption
proposal. The letter was coordinated by Computer Professionals
for Social Responsibility (CPSR), which has long sought to open
the issue of cryptography policy to public debate

The group cited the secrecy surrounding the proposal,
widespread public opposition to the plan and privacy concerns as
reasons why the initiative should not go forward.

The letter comes at a crucial point in the debate on
cryptography policy. An internal Administration review of the
issue is nearing completion and the National Security Agency (NSA)
is moving forward with efforts to deploy Clipper technology in
civilian agencies, including the Internal Revenue Service.

CPSR has sponsored several public conferences on
cryptography and privacy and has litigated Freedom of Informa-
tion Act cases seeking the disclosure of relevant government
documents. In one pending FOIA case, CPSR is challenging the
secrecy of the Skipjack algorithm which underlies the Clipper
proposal.

For additional information, contact Dave Banisar, CPSR
Washington, DC, (202) 544-9240, <[email protected]>.

=================================================================

January 24, 1994

The President
The White House
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

We are writing to you regarding the "Clipper" escrowed
encryption proposal now under consideration by the White House.
We wish to express our concern about this plan and similar
technical standards that may be proposed for the nation's
communications infrastructure.

The current proposal was developed in secret by federal
agencies primarily concerned about electronic surveillance, not
privacy protection. Critical aspects of the plan remain
classified and thus beyond public review.

The private sector and the public have expressed nearly
unanimous opposition to Clipper. In the formal request for
comments conducted by the Department of Commerce last year, less
than a handful of respondents supported the plan. Several hundred
opposed it.

If the plan goes forward, commercial firms that hope to
develop new products will face extensive government obstacles.
Cryptographers who wish to develop new privacy enhancing
technologies will be discouraged. Citizens who anticipate that
the progress of technology will enhance personal privacy will
find their expectations unfulfilled.

Some have proposed that Clipper be adopted on a voluntary
basis and suggest that other technical approaches will remain
viable. The government, however, exerts enormous influence in the
marketplace, and the likelihood that competing standards would
survive is small. Few in the user community believe that the
proposal would be truly voluntary.

The Clipper proposal should not be adopted. We believe that
if this proposal and the associated standards go forward, even on
a voluntary basis, privacy protection will be diminished,
innovation will be slowed, government accountability will be
lessened, and the openness necessary to ensure the successful
development of the nation's communications infrastructure will be
threatened.

We respectfully ask the White House to withdraw the Clipper
proposal.

Sincerely,

Public Interest and Civil Liberties Organizations

Marc Rotenberg, CPSR
Conrad Martin, Fund for Constitutional Government
William Caming, privacy consultant
Simon Davies, Privacy International
Evan Hendricks, US Privacy Council
Simona Nass, Society for Electronic Access
Robert Ellis Smith, Privacy Journal
Jerry Berman, Electronic Frontier Foundation

Cryptographers and Security Experts

Bob Bales, National Computer Security Association
Jim Bidzos, RSA Data Security Inc.
G. Robert Blakley, Texas A&M University
Stephen Bryen, Secured Communications Technologies, Inc.
David Chaum, Digicash
George Davida, University of Wisconsin
Whitfield Diffie, Sun Microsystems
Martin Hellman, Stanford University
Ingemar Ingemarsson, Universitetet i Linkvping
Ralph C. Merkle, Xerox PARC
William Hugh Murray, security consultant
Peter G. Neumann, SRI International
Bart Preneel, Katolieke Universiteit
Ronald Rivest, MIT
Bruce Schneier, Applied Cryptography (1993)
Richard Schroeppel, University of Arizona
Stephen Walker, Trusted Information Systems
Philip Zimmermann, Boulder Software Engineering

Industry and Academia

Andrew Scott Beals, Telebit International
Mikki Barry, InterCon Systems Corporation
David Bellin, North Carolina A&T University
Margaret Chon, Syracuse University College of Law
Laura Fillmore, Online BookStore
Scott Fritchie, Twin-Cities Free Net
Gary Marx, University of Colorado
Ronald B. Natalie, Jr, Sensor Systems Inc.
Harold Joseph Highland, Computers & Security
Doug Humphrey, Digital Express Group, Inc
Carl Pomerance, University of Georgia
Eric Roberts, Stanford University
Jonathan Rosenoer, CyberLaw & CyberLex
Alexis Rosen, Public Access Networks Corp.
Steven Zorn, Pace University Law School

(affiliations are for identification purposes only)

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 29 Jan 1994 22:38:03 -0500
From: "Lance J. Hoffman" <[email protected]>
Subject: Cryptography: Policy and Technology Trends

The following report is available by anonymous ftp from ftp.gwu.edu under
directory /pub/hoffman. The document is stored under the name "cryptpol".
It is a NIST-sponsored study.

The table of contents and abstract follows here.

CRYPTOGRAPHY: POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY TRENDS

Lance J. Hoffman
Faraz A. Ali
Steven L. Heckler
Ann Huybrechts

December 1, 1993

CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
2. TECHNOLOGY
3. MARKET ANALYSIS
4. EXPORT CONTROLS
5. PUBLIC POLICY ISSUES
5.1 EXECUTIVE BRANCH
5.2 CONGRESS
5.3 TRENDS
6. POTENTIAL SCENARIOS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

During the past five years, encryption technology has become easily available
to both individuals and businesses, affording them a level of security
formerly available practically to only military, national security, and law
enforcement agencies. As a result, a debate within the United States about
the proper balance between national security and personal freedom has been
initiated. Law enforcement and national security agencies would like to
maintain tight control over civilian encryption technologies, while industry
and individual and privacy rights advocates fight to expand their ability to
distribute and use cryptographic products as they please.

This report analyzes trends in encryption technology, markets, export
controls, and legislation. It identifies five trends which will have a
strong influence on cryptography policy in the United States:

* The continued expansion of the Internet and the progressive
miniaturization of cryptographic hardware combined with the increasing
availability and use of strong cryptographic software means that the
strongest encryption technologies will continue to become more easily
obtainable everywhere in the years ahead.

* Additional growth in networked and wireless communication will fuel a
strong demand for encryption hardware and software both domestically and
abroad, causing the U. S. high-technology industry to be increasingly
interested in selling encryption products overseas and in modifying
current export restrictions.

* Due to the responsibilities and bureaucratic dispositions of key
Executive Branch agencies, products using strong encryption algorithms
such as DES will continue to face at least some export restrictions,
despite the widespread availability of strong encryption products
overseas.

* The American public is likely to become increasingly concerned about
its privacy and about cryptographic policy as a result of the increased
amount of personal information available online and the growing number
of wireless and networked communications. The development and
increasingly widespread use of the National Information Infrastructure
will heighten these concerns.

* Encryption policy is becoming an important public policy issue that
will engage the attention of all branches of government. Congress will
become increasingly visible in this debate due to its power of agency
oversight and its role in passing laws accommodating the United States'
rapid rate of technological change. Agencies will remain very important
since they have the implementing and, often, the planning
responsibilities. Since individuals and industry have more direct
influence over Congress than over most other branches of government,
Congress may place somewhat more emphasis on personal freedom than many
other government actors.

Four potential scenarios are likely: mandatory escrowed encryption, voluntary
escrowed encryption, complete decontrol of encryption, or domestic decontrol
with strict export regulations.

[ The complete document mentioned above is now available
in the PRIVACY Forum archive. To access:

Via Anon FTP: From site "ftp.vortex.com": /privacy/crypt-plcy.1.Z
or: /privacy/crypt-plcy.1

Via e-mail: Send mail to "[email protected]" with
the line:

get privacy crypt-plcy.1

as the first text in the BODY of your message.

Via gopher: From the gopher server on site "gopher.vortex.com"
in the "*** PRIVACY Forum ***" area under "crypt-plcy.1".

-- MODERATOR ]

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 24 Jan 1994 10:22:56 -0800 (PST)
From: [email protected] (Diane Barlow Close)
Subject: Personal Information Via the Internet

I plan to submit this to RISKS, as well, but the issues cross both the
risk and the privacy lines, so I thought readers of this digest would be
interested in this too. I'm not trying to pick on Michael Bridgeman; I
think that his company is merely the starting point in a discussion about
the risks and effects that becoming part of the information highway
raises for the Internet. Michael cancelled his original article
before I could go back and retrieve a copy to include it in its
entirety here (the RISKS of posting to the Internet, eh? :-). So what
follows is about 3/4 of his original posting; only the contact info
has been removed:

Michael Bridgeman <[email protected]> writes:
>Infotech is an Information Provider and we have recently begun providing
>our services via the Internet. An partial list of some of our services
>include:
>
>Individual Credit Reports * Business Credit Reports * Dun & Bradstreet
>Pre-Tenant Background Check * SS# Locator Service * National Change of Addr
>Difficult Phone Numbers * Nationwide Marriage, Divorce and Death Records
>Criminal Records Search * Arrest & Convictions Records * Bank Acct Search
>Real Property Search * Workers Comp Claims * Consumer Affairs Reports
>Corporation Search * Tax Lien Search * Corp. Bankruptcy Search * Business
>Name Search * DMV Records * Registered Voter Search * Nationwide Warrants
> And MUCH MORE!
>
>Most requests are turned around with 24-48 hrs (depending upon complexity
>and depth of report needed) Reports can be delivered via Internet, US Mail,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Fax or Overnight. Infotech Adheres to the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
>Payment may be made via Visa, Mastercard or in advance of services.
>
> All information is kept in the strictest confidence and PGP delivery is also
> available ... [rest deleted]

I am now aware that PGP stands for a very good encryption mechanism, but
I still feel that there are risks in using the Internet for delivery
of such personal information. Although PGP is "available", nowhere
in the post does it say that he is going to use it all the time.

I've been on the Internet for a long time (since '81) and I certainly will
be the first to say that I don't follow every little nuance and new
development, so it'll probably come as no surprise that *I* hadn't heard
of PGP before. How many Internet newbie landlords are going to recognize
that PGP means "worlds greatest encryption scheme"? :-) Besides, unless
PGP is the ONLY way the info is sent via the Internet, the data won't be
safe. Sending things via e-mail is just like posting them to a newsgroup
as far as privacy goes.

Personally, my biggest concern wasn't so much the passage of personal data
through the system, encrypted or not, but the ease of faking e-mail so
that some unscrupulous person could easily give you a fake e-mail address
and personal data of another person to retrieve a copy of *that other
person's* credit report. I wonder what kind of safeguards they have in
place to prevent this, or to make sure that those who contact them via
e-mail really are who they say they are?

According to what I've read on misc.consumers and elsewhere, you can simply
register with any of the credit reporting services as a landlord, and you
don't even need an SSN# - just a name and address. $50 and a name and
address. Scary, isn't it? So what's to prevent "anyjoe" from getting
anyone's credit data through the Internet, now? With security there's not
just protection of data, there's authentication. The old "how do I know
that you're who you say you are" question.

And, concern #3, if he has this data on his Internet site, how safe is
it? How many security precautions has he taken on that site to protect
the data? Unix machines on the Internet are notorious for having security
holes that need to be plugged.

A lot of questions and so far no answers! :-) Comments anyone?

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Feb 1994 18:10:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Stanton McCandlish <[email protected]>
Subject: EFF Wants You (to add your voice to the crypto fight!)

The Electronic Frontier Foundation needs your help to ensure privacy rights!

* DISTRIBUTE WIDELY *

Monday, February 7th, 1994

From: Jerry Berman, Executive Director of EFF
[email protected]

Dear Friends of the Electronic Frontier,

I'm writing a personal letter to you because the time has now come for
action. On Friday, February 4, 1994, the Administration announced that it
plans to proceed on every front to make the Clipper Chip encryption scheme
a national standard, and to discourage the development and sale of
alternative powerful encryption technologies. If the government succeeds
in this effort, the resulting blow to individual freedom and privacy could
be immeasurable.

As you know, over the last three years, we at EFF have worked to ensure
freedom and privacy on the Net. Now I'm writing to let you know about
something *you* can do to support freedom and privacy. *Please take a
moment to send e-mail to U.S. Rep. Maria Cantwell ([email protected]) to
show your support of H.R. 3627, her bill to liberalize export controls on
encryption software.* I believe this bill is critical to empowering
ordinary citizens to use strong encryption, as well as to ensuring that
the U.S. software industry remains competitive in world markets.

Here are some facts about the bill:

Rep. Cantwell introduced H.R. 3627 in the House of Representatives on
November 22, 1993. H.R. 3627 would amend the Export Control Act to move
authority over the export of nonmilitary software with encryption
capabilities from the Secretary of State (where the intelligence community
traditionally has stalled such exports) to the Secretary of Commerce. The
bill would also invalidate the current license requirements for
nonmilitary software containing encryption capablities, unless there is
substantial evidence that the software will be diverted, modified or
re-exported to a military or terroristic end-use.

If this bill is passed, it will greatly increase the availability of
secure software for ordinary citizens. Currently, software developers do
not include strong encryption capabilities in their products, because the
State Department refuses to license for export any encryption technology
that the NSA can't decipher. Developing two products, one with less secure
exportable encryption, would lead to costly duplication of effort, so even
software developed for sale in this country doesn't offer maximum
security. There is also a legitimate concern that software companies will
simply set up branches outside of this country to avoid the export
restrictions, costing American jobs.

The lack of widespread commercial encryption products means that it will
be very easy for the federal government to set its own standard--the
Clipper Chip standard. As you may know, the government's Clipper Chip
initiative is designed to set an encryption standard where the government
holds the keys to our private conversations. Together with the Digital
Telephony bill, which is aimed at making our telephone and computer
networks "wiretap-friendly," the Clipper Chip marks a dramatic new effort
on the part of the government to prevent us from being able to engage in
truly private conversations.

We've been fighting Clipper Chip and Digital Telephony in the policy arena
and will continue to do so. But there's another way to fight those
initiatives, and that's to make sure that powerful alternative encryption
technologies are in the hands of any citizen who wants to use them. The
government hopes that, by pushing the Clipper Chip in every way short of
explicitly banning alternative technologies, it can limit your choices for
secure communications.

Here's what you can do:

I urge you to write to Rep. Cantwell today at [email protected]. In the
Subject header of your message, type "I support HR 3627." In the body of
your message, express your reasons for supporting the bill. EFF will
deliver printouts of all letters to Rep. Cantwell. With a strong showing
of support from the Net community, Rep. Cantwell can tell her colleagues
on Capitol Hill that encryption is not only an industry concern, but also
a grassroots issue. *Again: remember to put "I support HR 3627" in your
Subject header.*

This is the first step in a larger campaign to counter the efforts of
those who would restrict our ability to speak freely and with privacy.
Please stay tuned--we'll continue to inform you of things you can do to
promote the removal of restrictions on encryption.

In the meantime, you can make your voice heard--it's as easy as e-mail.
Write to [email protected] today.

Sincerely,

Jerry Berman
Executive Director, EFF
[email protected]

P.S. If you want additional information about the Cantwell bill, send
e-mail to [email protected]. To join EFF, write [email protected].
For introductory info about EFF, send any message to [email protected].

The text of the Cantwell bill can be found on the Internet with the any of
the following URLs (Universal Resource Locaters):

ftp://ftp.eff.org/pub/Policy/Legislation/cantwell.bill
http://www.eff.org/ftp/EFF/Policy/Legislation/cantwell.bill
gopher://gopher.eff.org/00/EFF/legislation/cantwell.bill

It will be available on AOL (keyword EFF) and CIS (go EFFSIG) soon.

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Feb 1994 22:28:08 EST
From: Dave Banisar <[email protected]>
Subject: Campaign Against Clipper

CPSR ANNOUNCES CAMPAIGN TO OPPOSE CLIPPER PROPOSAL

contact: [email protected] (202 544 9240)

Washington, DC -- Following the White House decision on Friday to
endorse a secret surveillance standard for the information highway,
Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR) today announced
a national campaign to oppose the government plan.

The Clipper proposal, developed in secret by the National Security
Agency, is a technical standard that will make it easier for government
agents to wiretap the emerging data highway.

Industry groups, professional associations and civil liberties
organizations have expressed almost unanimous opposition to the plan
since it was first proposed in April 1993.

According to Marc Rotenberg, CPSR Washington director, the
Administration made a major blunder with Clipper. "The public does not
like Clipper and will not accept it. This proposal is fatally flawed."

CPSR cited several problems with the Clipper plan:

o The technical standard is subject to misuse and compromise. It would
provide government agents with copies of the keys that protect
electronic communications. "It is a nightmare for computer security,"
said CPSR Policy Analyst Dave Banisar.

o The underlying technology was developed in secret by the NSA, an
intelligence agency responsible for electronic eavesdropping, not
privacy protection. Congressional investigations in the 1970s disclosed
widespread NSA abuses, including the illegal interception of millions of
cables sent by American citizens.

o Computer security experts question the integrity of the technology.
Clipper was developed in secret and its specifications are classified.
CPSR has sued the government seeking public disclosure of the Clipper
scheme.

o NSA overstepped its legal authority in developing the standard. A
1987 law explicitly limits the intelligence agency's power to set
standards for the nation's communications network.

o There is no evidence to support law enforcement's claims that new
technologies are hampering criminal investigations. CPSR recently forced
the release of FBI documents that show no such problems.

o The Administration ignored the overwhelming opposition of the general
public. When the Commerce Department solicited public comments on the
proposal last fall, hundreds of people opposed the plan while only a few
expressed support.

CPSR today announced four goals for its campaign to oppose the Clipper
initiative:

o First, to educate the public about the implications of the Clipper
proposal.

o Second, to encourage people to express their views on the Clipper
proposal, particularly through the computer network.

Toward that goal, CPSR has already begun an electronic petition on the
Internet computer network urging the President to withdraw the Clipper
proposal. In less than one week, the CPSR campaign has drawn thousands
of electronic mail messages expressing concern about Clipper. To sign
on, email [email protected] with the message "I oppose clipper"
in the body of the text.

o Third, to pursue litigation to force the public disclosure of
documents concerning the Clipper proposal and to test the legality of
the Department of Commerce's decision to endorse the plan.

o Fourth, to examine alternative approaches to Clipper.

Mr. Rotenberg said "We want the public to understand the full
implications of this plan. Today it is only a few experts and industry
groups that understand the proposal. But the consequences of Clipper
will touch everyone. It will affect medical payments, cable television
service, and everything in between.

CPSR is a membership-based public interest organization. For more
information about CPSR, send email to [email protected] or call 415 322
3778. For more information about Clipper, check the CPSR Internet
library CPSR.ORG. FTP/WAIS/Gopher and listserv access are available.

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 23 Jan 1994 10:44:40 -0500 (EST)
From: "Lance J. Hoffman" <[email protected]>
Subject: CFP'94 (fwd)

CFP '94
THE FOURTH CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS, FREEDOM AND PRIVACY
MARCH 23-26, 1994
CHICAGO PALMER HOUSE HILTON
"CYBERSPACE SUPERHIGHWAYS: ACCESS, ETHICS and CONTROL"

SPONSORS
ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY
SPECIAL INTERESTS GROUPS ON:
COMMUNICATIONS (SIGCOMM)
COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY (SIGCAS)
SECURITY, AUDIT AND CONTROL (SIGSAC)
JOHN MARSHALL LAW SCHOOL, CENTER FOR INFORMATICS LAW

PATRONS & SUPPORTERS (as of 15 December 1994)

AMERICAN EXPRESS CORP.
BAKER & McKENZIE
EQUIFAX, INC
LEGAL TRUSTEES, JERSEY, LTD. (UK)
MOTOROLA, INC
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (PENDING)
WIRED MAGAZINE

COOPERATING ORGANIZATIONS

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE for COMPUTER and
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY
IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY
IEEE-USA COMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS
AND INFORMATION POLICY
LIBRARY AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
PRIVACY INTERNATIONAL
U.S. PRIVACY COUNCIL

UNITED AIRLINES IS THE OFFICIAL AIRLINE FOR CFP'94

Fourth Conference on Computers, Freedom and Privacy
Chicago, Il., March 23 - 26, 1994

CFP'94, "Cyberspace Superhighways: Access, Ethics and Control"

General Chair
George B. Trubow, Center for Informatics Law, John Marshall Law School

Executive Committee
George B. Trubow, Chair, CFP'94
Lance J. Hoffman, George Washington University, Chair, CFP'92
Bruce Koball, San Francisco, CA, Chair, CFP'93

Conference Treasurer
Robert Ashenhurst, University of Chicago

Special Promotions
Patric Hedlund, Sweet Pea Productions

Alan Whaley, The WELL, San Francisco

Manager, Volunteers and Conference Office
Judi Clark, ManyMedia, Palo Alto

Chair, Student Writing Competition
Gene Spafford, Purdue University

Co-Chairs, Student Scholarship Program
John McMullen, Marist College

James Thompson, Northern Illinois University

Program Committee

David Banisar, Computer Professsionals for Social Responsibility
Jerry Berman, Electronic Frontier Foundation
Robert Belair, Mullenholz and Brimsek
Roger Clarke, Australian National Univesity
Mike Godwin, Electronic Frontier Foundation
Mark Hellmann, Pattishall, McAuliffe
Linda Knutson, Library & Information Technology Association
Dennis McKenna, Government Technology Magazine
Michael Mensik, Baker & McKenzie
Ron Plesser, Piper and Marbury
Priscilla Regan, George Mason University
Lance Rose, LOL Productions
Marc Rotenberg, Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility
Robert Ellis Smith, Privacy Journal
James Thompson, Northern Illinois University
Alan F. Westin, Columbia University

Conference Administration by John Marshall Law School:
Arrangements Director, RoseMarie Knight
Publicity & Publications, John McNamara
Financial Officer, James Kreminski
Program Coordinator, Gary Gassman

CYBERSPACE SUPERHIGHWAYS: ACCESS, ETHICS and CONTROL

Cyberspace, Information Superhighway, National Information Infrastructure,
Open Platforms, Computer and Communications Revolution, Electronic Networks,
Digital Data Bases and Information Society are words and phrases common to the
rhetoric of our modern era. The relationships between and among individuals,
society, nations, government entities and business organizations are in
constant flux as new stresses and alliances change the old "rules of the
game." Today's challenges are to define what is the "game," who owns the
"franchises," who can play, what are the rules and who calls the shots.
Information and communications technology raise new issues for freedom and
privacy in this new era. Such questions are on the agenda as the participants
in CFP'94 consider the alternatives and seek some solutions. Come, join in
the dialogue that will help to shape the world's future!

PRE-CONFERENCE TUTORIALS

On Wednesday March 23, the day before the formal conference begins, CFP '94 is
offering a number of in-depth tutorials covering a wide variety of subjects on
five parallel tracks. These presentations will be interesting, educational,
thought-provoking and often controversial. The tutorials are available at a
nominal additional registration cost.

CONFERENCE NEWSPAPER

On each of the three days of the conference, a daily newspaper will appear to
highlight what has transpired and announce important coming events. The staff
of "The Decisive Utterance," The John Marshall Law School's student newspaper,
is providing this service.

CONFERENCE RECEPTION AND TECHNOLOGY DISPLAY

On Wednesday evening, from 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m., you are invited to meet new
and old friends and colleagues at an opening reception at the John Marshall
Law School from 6:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m. The School is only two blocks from the
conference hotel. A state-of-the-art computer lab will be used to demonstrate
high-tech applications in academia and registrants will be invited to take
part.

SINGLE-TRACK MAIN PROGRAM

The technological revolution that is driving change in our society has many
facets and we are often unaware of the way they all fit together, especially
those parts that lie outside one's own daily experience. An important goal of
CFP '94 is to bring together individuals from disparate disciplines and
backgrounds and engage them in a balanced discussion of CFP issues. To this
end our main program, starting on Thursday, March 24, is on a single track
enabling registrants to attend all sessions. The concurrent Birds-
of-a-Feather meetings Thursday after 9:15 p.m. are exceptions.

BIRDS OF A FEATHER SESSIONS (BoF)

CFP '94 will provide a limited number of meeting rooms to interested
individuals for informal "Birds of a Feather" sessions after the formal
program Thursday, from 9:15 p.m. - 11:15 p.m. These sessions will provide an
opportunity for special-interest discussions. For further information or to
request a BoF contact CFP '94 Program Coordinator, Gary Gassman, at the John
Marshall Law School ([email protected])

MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY GALA

Registrants are invited to a very special reception and buffet at Chicago's
famed Museum of Science and Industry where they also will be treated to a
private showing and demonstration of the MSI's newly-opened Communications and
Imaging Exhibits. These multi-million dollar presentations occupy 15,000
sq.ft. of museum space and required three years to develop. "Communications"
is a panoramic display of how technology has transformed our lives by
dissolving distance and and making connections; visitors can even enter the
unreal world of virtual reality. "Imaging" is a mindboggling journey through
modern applications of imaging technology. Visitors can even play the role of
brain surgeon, using radiosurgery made possible by 3-D imaging, or explore
imaging in forensic science by using MRI, fingerprint enhancement, face aging
and other modern technologies to solve a crime!

REGISTRATION WILL BE LIMITED

CFP '94 registration will be limited to 550 attendees, so we advise you to
register early to assure admission and to take advantage of the early
registration discounts.

MEALS AND RECEPTIONS

A key component of the CFP conferences has been the interaction between the
diverse communities that constitute our audience. To promote this interaction
CFP '94 provides three luncheons, three receptions and three evening meals
with the price of registration.

EFF PIONEER AWARDS

All conference attendees are invited to the EFF Pioneer Awards Reception
sponsored by the Electronic Frontier Foundation on Thursday evening. These,
the third annual EFF Pioneer Awards, will be given to individuals and
organizations that have made distinguished contributions to the human and
technological realms touched by computer-based communications.

CONFERENCE BUSINESS OFFICE

The Conference business and registration office will be open from 8:00 a.m.
until 9:00 p.m. on Wednsday thru Friday, and until 6:00 p.m. on Saturday, for
registration and general information.

NOTE: The following program content and schedule is subject to change. The
Information Superhighway is a fast track!

Wednesday, March 23, 1994
Pre-Conference Tutorials

9:00 a.m. - noon

Cyberspace Law for Non-Lawyers
This tutorial presents an outline of the law for laymen,
dealing with Constitutional and legal issues that confront
those concerned with privacy, crime, and freedom of expression
in cyberspace. There will be summaries of recent cases,
legislative proposals and government activities.
Mike Godwin, Online Counsel, EFF

Rules of the Road for Network Travelers. (CLE Credit Approved)
The information superhighway presents a variety of rights and
risks. Learn about the legal issues of computer networks,
services and bulletin boards, including on-line property
rights; protecting personal privacy and business information;
electronic publishing and multimedia rights; viruses, adult
materials and other no-nos.
Lance Rose, Attorney and Author of "Syslaw."

Get Mad, Get Motivated, Get Moving!
The focus of this panel is on citizen action for privacy
protection: how to reach and organize constituents; support
legislation or other privacy protection measures; conduct
public education activities; use the technology in program
activities, etc.
Robert Ellis Smith, Privacy Journal

Exploring Internet: A Guided Tour
This tutorial gives participants a practical introduction to
the most popular and powerful applications available via the
world's largest computer network, the Internet. There will be
hands-on demonstrations of communications tools such as e-
mail, conferencing, Internet Relay Chat and resource discover,
and navigations aids such as Gopher, WAIS, Archie and World
Wide Web. Extensive documentation will be provided.
Mark Graham, Pandora Systems

Using the Freedom of Information Act
The Federal FOIA is the principal focus of this tutorial
though some attention is given to the use of state FOIAs.
The session will cover procedures for making requests,
identifying the information desired, differences between
electronic and hard copy responses, and the appeals process
within agencies and the courts.
David Sobel, Counsel, Computer Professional for Social
Responsibility

2:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.

Cryptography: What, and How?
Data encryption is in the cyberspace limelight as perhaps the
only technique to ensure digital privacy and security; it is
also the subject of sharp debate regarding control of the
development and use of the technology. This tutorial will
display what encryption is, how it works, and some of the
options for its use. Computer animations and graphic displays
will be used to help make cryptography comprehensible; the
audience will engage in some hands-on encryption exercises.
Mark Hellmann, Pattishall, McAuliffe et.al, Chicago

Electronic Detectives: Critical Issues for Public and Private
Investigators.
Both governmental and private sector investigators have
unprecedented access to "open" sources that were practically
inaccessible a few years ago. This information environment
poses opportunities and risks that will be the focus of this
program. Investigative techniques via networks will be
demonstrated and the legal, ethical and practical issues will
be explored. Actual case-studies will be utilized.
Michael Moran, CCO; Michael Robertson, CFE

Hi-Tech Intellectual Property Law Primer (CLE Credit Approved)
This panel will cover the special problems in patent,
copyright and tradmark law engendered by computers and digital
technology, with attention to the impact of recent cases. The
differences in European protection will be surveyed as well as
technology export restrictions.
Raymond Nimmer, University of Texas Law School
Leslie A. Bertagnolli, Baker & McKenzie, Chicago

Transactional Data Analyses: Making FOI Access Useful
Electronic communication, coupled with federal and state
Freedom of Information Acts, has made a great deal of data
available to the public regarding the activities and policies
of government enforcement and regulatory agencies. Knowing
how to evaluate and use this information is critical to
understanding and demonstrating what the data really means.
The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) of
Syracuse University uses its various knowledge-bases to
demonstrate the power of transactional data. Colorgraphics
and analytic techniques are combined in demonstrations of how
otherwise drab statistics can be displayed dramatically to aid
in policy analyses and advocacy.
David Burnham, former New York Times Investigative Reporter
Susan Long, Co-director, TRAC, SUNY-Syracuse

Election Fraud and Modern Technology
There has been increasing attention, in the U.S. and abroad,
to the use of modern technology in the electoral process.
Buying votes, stealing votes, changing votes -- whether in the
environment of punch-cards or fully automated voting machines
-- is the subject of this tutorial. Mock elections will be
staged in which the participants have roles in planning to
perpetrate as well as prevent vote fraud. Voter registration,
phone-based voting, cryptography and verification are among
the strategies and technologies to be considered.
Russel L. Brand, Reasoning Systems.

SPECIAL EVENTS ON WEDNESDAY, Mar. 23:

Noon - 4:00 p.m., Privacy International Business Meeting
This meeting, at the John Marshall Law School, begins with a
buffet luncheon. Non-members interested in learning about
P.I. and the Illinois Privacy Council are invited to be guests
for lunch and a briefing. Guest space will be limited so
attendance on a "first come" basis MUST be confirmed by
March 8, 1994.

6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Conference Reception
All CFP registrants are invited to a reception and open house
demonstrating the John Marshall Law School's recently opened
computer lab. This also is an opportunity to "network" the
old-fashioned way, meeting old friends and making new ones
while enjoying the reception and buffet. This state-of-the-art
facility will display information and communications
technology being used in the educational environment. Guests
also may participate in hands-on demonstrations of the
technology under the tutelage of JMLS faculty and staff.

9:15 p.m. - 11:15 p.m. "CFP SOAPBOX SQUARE"

On Wednesday, March 23, from 9:15 p.m. to 11:15 p.m., "CFP Soapbox
Square" will be open. This is a chance for those who have
something to say publicly to say it and to hear response from
others! Those interested in making a brief statement (3 minutes)
at this meeting must file their request and describe their topics
by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday. Discussion time for various topics will
be allocated based upon the number of topics and the number who
have asked to speak. Requests to speak can be made at the time of
pre-registration or at the conference site.

Thursday, March 24, 1994

8:30 a.m., CFP'94 Official Opening

Welcome to the Conference: George B. Trubow, General Chair
Welcome to Chicago: Hon. Richard M. Daley, Mayor (Invited)

9:00 a.m. Keynote Address: Mr. John Podesta, Assistant to the
President, Washington, D.C.

10:00 a.m. Break

10:30 a.m. The Information Superhighway: Politics and the Public
Internet.
The Administration and Congress propose policies that will
lead to a digital multimedia highway. How can the road be
built at affordable cost while serving the public interest and
our constitutional values?
Chair: Jerry Berman, Electronic Frontier Foundation

12:00 p.m. Lunch
Speaker: U.S. Senator Paul Simon (Invited)

1:30 p.m. Is It Time for a U.S. Data Protection Agency?
Beginning with the Privacy Act of 1974, proposals to establish
an oversight body for data protection have been offered but
not adopted; another proposal is currently pending in
Congress. Against a background of almost twenty years
experience under the Privacy Act, the panel will consider
whether the current political, economic and technological
mileau favors establishment of a data protection agency.
Chair: Priscilla M. Regan, George Mason University

2:45 p.m. Break

3:00 p.m. "Owning and Operating the NII: Who, How, When?"
The National Information Infrastructure is an important
initiative for the present Administration. This panel will
explore policy and technical issues such as equity and access,
connectivity and standards, funding and regulation, privacy
and security, ownership and operation.
Chair: Marc Rotenberg, Computer Professionals for Social

4:15 p.m. Break

4:30 p.m. Data Encryption: Who Holds The Keys?
Recent attempts, led by federal law enforcment agencies, to
control the development and dissemination of strong
cyptography programs has engendered considerable discussion
and disagreement. The interests of law enforcement agencies
may conflict with the need for data security and personal
privacy demanded by users of electronic networks. This panel
will evaluate proposals to deal with the question.
Moderator: Willis Ware, Rand Corporation

5:30 p.m. Adjourn

6:00 p.m. EFF Awards Reception
Once again, the Electronic Frontier Foundation hosts a
reception prior to its annual Pioneer Awards presentation.
All CFP attendees are invited to enjoy the recepiton and
congratulate the new honorees.

7:00 p.m. Conference Banquet (Speaker to be announced)

9:15 - 11:15 p.m. "Birds-of-a-Feather" sessions run concurrently.

Friday, March 25, 1994.

8:30 a.m. Keynote: David Flaherty, Data Protection Commissioner,
Victoria, British Columbia

9:15 a.m. Health Information Policy
The Clinton Health Reform Plan, and variations on that theme,
stress the use of information technology to help the
efficiency and effectiveness of health care. Expert
consultation, improved service delivery through new
technology, and improvements in the processing of health
insurance claims bring promise of cost cuts as well as the
possibilities of threats to personal privacy. This panel of
experts will form the "CFP Group" to explore these promises
and threats.
Chair: Robert R. Belair, Mullenholz & Brimsek, Wash., D.C.

10:30 a.m. Break

10:45 a.m. Can Market Mechanisms Protect Consumer Privacy?
When does protection of consumer privacy require legal
standards and government regulation and when can bargains and
agreements in the market suffice? What role do new
technological options for individuals and organizations play
in facilitating private choice and market transactions? Is
"ownership" of personal information a useful concept or a dead
end for privacy protection in an information age?
Chair: Dr. Alan F. Westin, Columbia University

Noon Lunch, Speaker: Philip Zimmerman, PGP

1:30 p.m. Creating an Ethical Community in Cyberspace
The fundamental ethical questions posed by the "settlement" of
cyberspace are not new. What is new is that the relationship
between behavior and the ethical conceptions by which we judge
behavior shift and become more ambiguous and vague. This
sessions examines the ethical dilemmas brought about by the
"colonization" of cyberspace that must be resolved to
establish and maintain a stable, humane environment.
Chair: Prof. James Thomas, Northern Ilinois University

2:45 p.m. Break

3:00 p.m. Standards for Certifying Computer Professionals
The subject of licensing of computer professionals is
receiving increased attention by professional organizations
and by state legislatures. Both the ACM and IEEE have
proposals under study, and perhaps a half-dozen states are
considering licensing bills. This panel will consider the
pros and cons and suggest some standards for certification.
Chair: Donald Gotterbarn, East Tennessee State Univ.

4:15 p.m. Break

4:30 p.m. Hackers and Crackers: Using and Abusing the Networks
This session will explore issues surrounding the "fringe" of
network use. What can and should be exchanged? Who will
monitor "appropriate" use? What's the current difference, if
any, between "hacker" and "cracker"? What should be expected
and accepted regarding the role of law enforcement agencies?

5:30 p.m. Adjourn

5:45 p.m. Buses begin departing for the Chicago Museum of Science
and Industry for a private reception and demonstration at
the Communications and Imaging exhibits.

9:00 p.m. Buses begin departing for return to the Palmer House and
Chicago's "Loop."

Saturday, March 26, 1994

9:00 a.m. The Role of Libraries on the Information Superhighway
As the information landscape changes dramatically the historic
role of libraries as the "information commons" is challenged.
How will the Carnegie ideal of free, public access be
implemented by the library community? Should it be? This
panel will consider policy for an information network in the
public interest.
Moderator: Tamara J. Miller, President, Library and
Information Technology Association

10:15 a.m. Break

10:30 a.m. International Governance of Cyberspace: New Wine in Old
Bottles -- Or Is It Time For New Bottles?
Much discussion transpires between members of the Economic
Community, the O.E.C.D., the Council of Europe, and the United
States, regarding data protection, intellectual property
rights, transborder data flow, the mediation of disputes, etc.
This panel will consider whether existing mechanisms can solve
the problems or a new structure for the governance of
cyberspace is needed.
Chair: Ronald L. Plesser, Piper and Marbury

Noon: Lunch
Speaker: Simon Davies, Director General, Privacy
International

1:30 p.m. The Electronic Republic: Delivery of Government Services
over the Information Superhighway
State and local governments use computer networks to deliver
a wide range of services and information to the public;
electronic "kiosks" are moving to "government by ATM." How
will this interaction between government and the people affect
the process of American government in the future?
Chair: Dennis McKenna, Publisher, "Government Technology."

2:45 p.m. Break

3:00 p.m. Education and NREN, K - 12
Internetworking is a very new technology being rapidly
deployed to conventional classrooms, a very old technology.
The panel will explore the clash of contradictory assumptions
embedded within these systems -- a clash which has profound
implications for the future of both the network and the
classrooom.
Chair: Steven Hodas, NASA NREN Project

4:00 Break

4:15 p.m. Guarding the Digital Persona
After this panel has established the threats to personal
privacy from individual profiling and target marketing, and a
regime to legally recognize and protect an "electronic
personality" is put forth, Bruce Sterling will offer to
explain why much of that worry is misdirected!
Chair: Roger Clarke, Australian National University

5:30 p.m. Adjournment

Featured Speakers Confirmed as of 12/15/93

Philip Agre, Dept. of Sociology, U. of Cal., San Diego
David Banisar, Computer Professional for Social Responsibility
Robert R. Belair, Mullenholz & Brimsek, Washington, D.C.
Jerry Berman, Executive Director, Electronic Frontier Foundation
Leslie A. Bertagnolli, Baker & McKenzie, Chicago
Andrew Blau, The Benton Foundation, Washington, D.C.
Dr. Herbert Burkett, GMD, Koln, Germany
Jeffrey Chester, Director, Center for Media Education
Roger Clarke, College of Commerce, Australian National University
Ellen Craig, Commissioner, Illinois Commerce Commission
Simon Davies, Director General, Privacy International, London
David Flaherty, Data Commissioner, British Columbia
Oscar H. Gandy, Media Studies Center, Columbia University
Donald Gotterbarn, East Tennessee State University
Allan Hammond, New York University Law School
Steven Hodas, NASA NREN Project, Washington, D.C.
David Johnson, Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, Washington
Steven Kolodney, Dir., Information Technology, State of California
Curtis Kurnow, Landels, Ripley & Diamond, San Francisco
Kenneth Laudon, School of Information Systems, New York University
Lee Ledbetter, HDX
Jay Lemke, School of Education, City University of New York
Duncan MacDonald, V.P. & Gen. Couns., Citicorp Credit Services
Shirley Marshall, Public Sector Marketing, IBM
Dennis McKenna, Publisher, Government Technology Magazine
Michael Mensik, Baker & McKenzie, Chicago
Raymond Nimmer, University of Texas
Eli Noam, Columbia University School of Business
Michael North, President, North Communications
Ronald L. Plesser, Piper and Marbury, Washington, D.C.
Marc Rotenberg, Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility
Rohan Samarajiva, Department of Communication, Ohio State Univ.
David Sobel, Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility
Bruce Sterling, Sci-Fi Writer and Journalist, Austin, Texas
Connie Stout, Texas Education Network
James Thomas, Department of Sociology, Northern Illinois University
Greg Tucker, Head of the Business School, Monash Univ., Australia
Bruce Umbaugh, Old Dominion University
Patricia Valey, Acting Director, Office of Consumer Affairs
Maarten van Swaay, Dept. of Computer Science, Kansas State U.
Daniel Weitzner, Sr. Staff Counsel, Electronic Frontier Foundation
Alan Westin, Columbia University
Christine Zahorik, Staff, Senate Committee on

REGISTRATION

Register for the conference by returning the Registration Form
along with the appropriate payment. The registration fee includes
conference materials, three luncheons (Thursday, Friday and
Saturday), a reception, open house and buffet (Wednesday), a
reception and banquet (Thursday), and a gala reception and buffet
at the Museum of Science and Industry. Payment must accompany
registration.

REGISTRATION FEES

If paid by: 7 February 8 March On Site
Early Regular Late

Conference Fees $315 $370 $420
Tutorial Fees $145 $175 $210
Conf. & Tutorial $460 $545 $630
Save by Registering Early!

FP '94 SCHOLARSHIPS

The Fourth Conference on Computers, Freedom and Privacy (CFP '94)
will provide a limited number of full registration scholarships for
students and other interested individuals. These scholarships will
cover the full costs of registration, including luncheons, two
banquets, and all conference materials. Scholarship recipients
will be responsible for their own lodging and travel expenses.
Persons wishing to apply for one of these fully-paid registrations
should contact CFP '94 Scholarship Chair:

John F. McMullen
CFP '94 Scholarship Committee
Perry Street
Jefferson Valley, NY 10535
Phone: (914) 245-2734 or email [email protected]

HOTEL ACCOMMODATIONS

CFP'94 will be held at the Palmer House Hilton, a venerable Chicago
landmark in the "Loop." This spacious and comfortable facility is
easily accessible from the O'Hare International and Chicago Midway
airports, and is only 2 blocks from The John Marshall Law School.
Special conference rates of $99/night, single or multiple
occupancy, are available. Our room block is guaranteed only until
March 1, 1994, so we urge you to make your reservations as early as
possible. When calling for reservations, please be sure to mention
CFP'94 to obtain the conference rate.

Hotel Reservations: Palmer House Hilton, 17 E. Monroe, Chicago,
Il., 60603. Tel: 312-726-7500; 1-800-HILTONS; Fax, 312-263-2556

REFUND POLICY

Refund requests received in writing by March 8, 1994 will be
honored. A $50 cancellation fee will be applied. No refunds will
be made after this date; however, registrants may designate a
substitute.

OFFICIAL AIRLINE
CFP'94 is proud to have United Airlines -- Chicago's Own -- as our
own exclusive official airline! United will give our conferees a
5% discount off any published United or United Express airfare,
including First Class, or 10% off the new BUA fare when purchased
at least a week in advance of travel. Call toll-free 1-800-521-
4041 to make reservations and be sure to give our CFP'94 ID Number:
541QI.

REGISTRATION

NAME (Please Print)

TITLE

AFFILIATION

MAILING ADDRESS

CITY, STATE, ZIP

TELEPHONE

E-MAIL

PRIVACY LOCKS: We will not sell, rent. loan, exchange or use this
information for any purpose other than official Computers, Freedom
and Privacy Conference activities. A printed roster containing
this information will be distrusted at the conference. Please
indicate if you wish information to be excluded from the roster:

( ) Print only name, affiliation and phone no.
( ) Print name only
( ) Omit my name from the roster

( ) I would like to attend the Privacy International luncheon
and briefing at noon on Wednesday, March 23. (Your attendance as
a guest of P.I. and the Illinois Privacy Council MUST be confirmed
by March 8, and is on a "first come" basis.)

"CFP Soapbox Square"
( ) I would like to make a formal statement (3 mins.) during
"CFP Soapbox Square" to be held from 9:15 p.m. - 11:15 p.m. on
March 23. My topic:

( ) I plan to attend "Soapbox Square" but do not wish to make
a prepared statement, though I may join in the discussion.

REGISTRATION FEES
If paid by: 7 February 8 March On Site
Early Regular Late
Conference Fees $315 $370 $420
Tutorial Fees $145 $175 $210
Conf. & Tutorial $460 $545 $630

Note: If you have registered for the Tutorials, please select one
from each group:
9:00 A.M. - 12:00 NOON
( ) Cyberspace Law for Non-Lawyers
( ) Rules of the Road for Network
Travelers (CLE Credit)
( ) Citizen Action: Get Mad, Met
Motivated, Get Moving!
( ) Exploring Internet: A Guided Tour
( ) Using FOIA

2:00 P.M. - 5:00 P.M.
( ) Cryptography: What, and How?
( ) Introduction to Hi-Tech Law (CLE Credit)
( ) TRAC: Evaluative Data Analysis
( ) The Electronic Detective" Online
Investigations
( ) Electoral Fraud

PAYMENTS TOTAL AMOUNT

Please indicated method of payment:
( ) Check (payable to JMLS-CFP '94)

( ) VISA
( ) MasterCard
Credit Card #

Expiration Date

Name on Card

Signature
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
"Computers, Freedom & Privacy '94", The John Marshall Law School
315 South Plymouth Court, Chicago, Illinois 60604
e-mail = [email protected] voice = 312/987-1419

General Chair: Conference Coordinator:
George B. Trubow Gary L. Gassman
e-mail = [email protected] e-mail = [email protected]

------------------------------

End of PRIVACY Forum Digest 03.03
************************