Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG)

               Report from the IESG Teleconference

                       19 August 1993

        Recorded by:  John Stewart, IESG Secretary

This report contains IESG meeting notes, positions and action items.

These minutes were compiled by the IETF Secretariat, which is supported
by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NCR 8820945.

For more information please contact the IESG Secretary.
[email protected].

ATTENDEES
---------
   Bradner, Scott / Harvard
   Coya, Steve / CNRI
   Crocker, Dave / SGI
   Crocker, Steve / TIS
   Gross, Philip / ANS
   Hinden, Robert / SUN
   Klensin, John / UNU
   Knowles, Stev / FTP Software
   Mankin, Allison / NRL
   Rose, Marshall / DBC
   Stewart, John / CNRI

IAB Liaison
   Rekhter, Yakov / IBM

Regrets
   Chapin, Lyman / BBN
   Huitema, Christian / INRIA
   Huizer, Erik / SURFnet
   Piscitello, Dave / Bellcore
   Reynolds, Joyce / ISI



Minutes
-------

1. Administrivia

  o Roll call

2. Protocol Actions

  o The ballot for moving "Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3
     Medium Attachment Units (MAUs)" <draft-ietf-hubmib-mau-02.txt> to
     Proposed Standard was not completed.

  o The IESG approved moving "Token Ring Extensions to the Remote
     Network Monitoring MIB" <draft-ietf-rmonmib-trmib-01.txt> to
     Proposed Standard.

  o The IESG approved moving "Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE
     802.3 Repeater Devices" <draft-ietf-hubmib-objects-00.txt> to
     Draft Standard.

  o A ballot was taken to move the following CIDR Internet-Drafts
     to Proposed Standard:

      draft-rekhter-ipaddress-guide-08.txt
      draft-fuller-cidr-strategy-03.txt
      draft-ietf-iesg-cidr-01.txt

    and the following CIDR Internet-Draft to Informational:

      draft-rekhter-cidr-environment-01.txt

    Scott Bradner reported that the Operational Requirements Area
    will be making some small editorial comments, but that the ballot
    should go ahead and be taken now.  He said that deploying CIDR
    would not be an implementation burden, but that people will have
    to understand the difference between a "prefix mask" and, for
    example, a "Class B" network.  Bradner reported that, assuming
    allocation stays the same as it is now, the estimate for when all
    network numbers will be exhausted is early 1997.

4. Working Group Informational Documents

  o Allison Mankin spoke with Dave Piscitello regarding the
     publication of "Assignment of System Identifiers for TUBA/CLNP
     Hosts" <draft-ietf-tuba-sysids-01.txt> as an Informational RFC.
     Mankin expects that the document will be revised.

5. Management Issues

  o Prototype status
     Several different definitions were proposed for Prototype. There
     was clear consensus that the IESG needs to discuss Prototype in
     more depth.  The discussion will be continued when Erik Huizer
     returns from vacation.