IETF STEERING GROUP (IESG)

                 REPORT FROM THE IETF MEETING

                      February 22nd, 1993

        Reported by:  Greg Vaudreuil, IESG Secretary

This report contains IESG meeting notes, positions and action items.

These minutes were compiled by the IETF Secretariat which is supported
by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NCR 8820945.

For more information please contact the IESG Secretary.
[email protected].



ATTENDEES
---------

   Almquist, Philip / Consultant
   Chapin, Lyman / BBN
   Crocker, Dave / TBO
   Crocker, Steve / TIS
   Coya, Steve / CNRI
   Gross, Philip / ANS
   Hinden, Robert / SUN
   Hobby, Russ / UC-DAVIS
   Huizer, Erik / SURFnet
   Piscitello, Dave/ Bellcore
   Stockman, Bernard / SUNET/NORDUnet
   Vaudreuil, Greg / CNRI

Regrets

   Borman, David / Cray Research
   Knowles, Stev / FTP Software
   Reynolds, Joyce / ISI

AGENDA
------

1) Administrivia
o Role Call
o Bash the Agenda
o Approval of the Minutes
   - February 1st
   - February 8th

2) Protocol Actions
o Directed ARP
o NFS
o RPC
o IP Address Guidelines
o X.500 DUA Metrics
o Noop Tools RFC

3) Technical management issues

o Nomination Committee Clarification
o Network Management Area
o SNMP
o RIP Applicability Statement
o Wide Area Routing with RIP
o Delegation of Naming Authority for the US Domain

4) RFC Editor Actions

o SNMP Over Foo Documents

5) Working Group Actions
o IP Security (ipsec)
o Integrated Directory Services (ids)
o Training Materials (trainmat)
o Remote Conferencing (remconf)
o Secure FTP

MINUTES
--------

1) Administrivia

o Approval of the Minutes

  The minutes from the Teleconferences of February 1st and February
  8th were approved.

o Next Meeting

  The next IESG teleconference was scheduled for March 1st, from 11:30
  to 1:30 ET.

2) Protocol Actions

o Directed ARP

  After consulting with the IPLPDN Working Group, it is clear this
  protocol is a product of that group. The proposal suffers from
  several technical flaws and the IESG was concerned that there is no
  specific interest in actually implementing and experimenting with
  this protocol.  Acknowledging these shortcomings, the IESG approved
  this protocol for publication as Experimental. This protocol will
  clearly need additional work should it be proposed for
  standardization.

ACTION: Vaudreuil -- Announce the approval of the Directed ARP
specification as an Experimental Protocol.

  The IESG discussed the general case where a IETF Working Group may
  produce a specification for experimentation which has significant
  shortcomings.

POSITION:  A protocol which is intended to be experimental may be
published as a IETF Working Group product even with known technical
deficiencies.

o NFS/RPC

  There is no action to report.

o IP Addressing Guidelines

  Progress is being made on preparing the CIDR document set.  The IESG
  was reminded that it is responsible for an Applicability Statement
  (AS) for CIDR.

ACTION: Gross, Hinden: Write the Applicability Statement for CIDR.

o X.500 DUA Metrics

  The IESG had no objection to the publication of this document as an
  informational product of the OSIDS Working Group.

ACTION: Vaudreuil -- Announce the acceptance of the X.500 DUA Metrics
document as an Informational document.

o Tools RFC

  The IESG discussed this Network OSI Operations Working Group
  document.  The document is partly a requirements document and partly
  a NOC Tools style catalogue of tools necessary to operate a CLNP
  internet. It was noted that this work would be a good candidate for
  a proposed standard "CLNP requirements" document.

  The title needs to be revised before it can be published as an RFC.

ACTION: Vaudreuil - Request clarification from the Working Group
chairman about the nature of this document. Communicate the IESG sense
that this would be a good basis of a requirements document.

3) Technical Management Issues

o Nomination Committee Request

  The IESG nomination committee requested clarification on an earlier
  IESG discussion as to whether the IESG facilitator and the IETF
  chairman should be the same person.  The IESG discussed this and
  agreed that the IETF chairman should remain the chairman of the
  IESG.  Secretariat help is available to delegate specific tasks as
  the chairman requires.

POSITION: IESG chairman should be the IETF chairman.  Secretariat help
is available as needed and as delegated by the IETF chairman.

ACTION: Coya - Further ponder the role of the IESG facilitator WRT to
the IETF Secretariat and report thoughts to the IESG.

o Network Management Area

  With the resignation of Chuck Davin, the IESG is without a Network
  Management Area Director.  Besides the ongoing work on SNMP
  Evolution, there are a collection of MIBs that require review and
  processing for advancement.  The IESG agreed that the IESG should be
  able to cover for the Network Management Area Director and should
  not wait for a new Area Director.

ACTION: Vaudreuil -- Investigate the current status of the Network
Management Area Directorate and investigate the process by which the
various MIBS can be reviewed.

o SNMP Version2

  The SNMP Version 2 protocol is nearing completion and is expected to
  be submitted to the IESG before Columbus.  There continues to be a
  degree of controversy over the process and to a lesser degree the
  content of the protocol.

ACTION: SCrocker, Piscitello - Poll the SNMP community for feedback on
the process of SNMP Evolution.  Report to the IESG.

  Two documents are of low quality and need to be rewritten, however
  the IESG was willing to allow the current documents to progress
  provided they are re-written before advancement to Draft Standard.

o RIP Applicability Statement.

  No action to report.

o Wide Area Routing with RIP

  No action to report

o Delegation of Naming Authority for the US Domain

  Discussion on the delegation of authority for the US domain was deferred.

4) RFC Editor Actions

o SNMP over Multi-Protocols

  There was no objection from the working group or authors to the
  elimination of the text in each referring to SNMP Security.

ACTION: Piscitello - Communicate to the RFC Editor the IESG willingness
to have the SNMP over Foo documents edited before publication to
eliminate the SNMP Security references.

5) Working Group Actions

o IP Security

  No Progress to Report

o Integrated Directory Services (ids)

  The formation of the Integrated Directory Services Working Group was
  approved by the IESG.

ACTION: Vaudreuil -- Announce the formation of the Integrated Directory
Services Working Group.

o Network Training Materials (trainmat)

  The formation of the Training Materials Working Group was approved
  by the IESG.

ACTION: Vaudreuil -- Announce the formation of the Network Training
Materials Working Group.

o Remote Conferencing

  The Remote Conferencing work is being carried out in several single
  focus working groups.  As additional requirements arise other
  Working Groups will be formed. No further action is required.

o Secure FTP

  It is not clear whether this effort should be chartered in the
  Applications or Security Area.  While the focus is intended to be on
  security aspects, other changes to FTP are possible and should be
  coordinated in the Applications Area.  No resolution was reached in
  the short time this was discussed.


Appendix -- Summary of Action Items Assigned

ACTION: Vaudreuil -- Announce the approval of the Directed ARP
specification as an Experimental Protocol.

ACTION: Gross, Hinden: Write the Applicability Statement for CIDR.

ACTION: Vaudreuil -- Announce the acceptance of the X.500 DUA Metrics
document as an Informational document.

ACTION: Vaudreuil - Request clarification from the Working Group
chairman about the nature of this document. Communicate the IESG sense
that this would be a good basis of a requirements document.

ACTION: Coya - Further ponder the role of the IESG facilitator WRT to
the IETF Secretariat and report thoughts to the IESG.

ACTION: Vaudreuil -- Investigate the current status of the Network
Management Area Directorate and investigate the process by which the
various MIBS can be reviewed.

ACTION: SCrocker, Piscitello - Poll the SNMP community for feedback on
the process of SNMP Evolution.  Report to the IESG.

ACTION: Piscitello - Communicate to the RFC Editor the IESG willingness
to have the SNMP over Foo documents edited before publication to
eliminate the SNMP Security references.

ACTION: Vaudreuil -- Announce the formation of the Integrated Directory
Services Working Group.

ACTION: Vaudreuil -- Announce the formation of the Network Training
Materials Working Group.

Appendix - Summary of Positions Taken

POSITION:  A protocol which is intended to be experimental may be
published as a IETF Working Group product even with known technical
deficiencies.

POSITION: IESG chairman should be the IETF chairman.  Secretariat help
is available as needed and as delegated by the IETF chairman.