| [HN Gopher] GitHub: A case study in link maintenance and 404 pag... | |
| ___________________________________________________________________ | |
| GitHub: A case study in link maintenance and 404 pages (2013) | |
| Author : roryokane | |
| Score : 17 points | |
| Date : 2026-01-07 16:36 UTC (5 days ago) | |
| web link (chrismorgan.info) | |
| w3m dump (chrismorgan.info) | |
| | tempaccsoz5 wrote: | |
| | Hilariously, a link given as an example is now effectively | |
| | broken. | |
| | | |
| | https://github.com/styleguide/templates/2.0, cited in a comment | |
| | cited in the article now just redirects to a style guide landing | |
| | page with no context. | |
| | lelandfe wrote: | |
| | In their defense, I think that's the right move. There isn't an | |
| | analogue for that page anymore, so it redirects to the new | |
| | style guide's landing. | |
| | | |
| | I think it's rather cool that they've redirects still going for | |
| | (quick Archive check) 11-year defunct URLs. | |
| | holman wrote: | |
| | 404s were designed for performance, as OP says here, but also to | |
| | be as simple as possible. | |
| | | |
| | Part of the difficulty was info leakage; early on there was a lot | |
| | of concern that a 403 would imply the existence of a repo that | |
| | the org might otherwise not want known publicly. This was a | |
| | little trickier in practice, really: early versions of the page | |
| | took slightly different pathways as it went through auth, so | |
| | based on the duration of the page to render you could make some | |
| | assumptions about whether the underlying repo existed or not. It | |
| | was annoying to sort out, so it wasn't touched very often. | |
| | | |
| | Certainly a lot could have been done with 404s over the years; | |
| | they've only gotten worse. I put ultrathin font weights on the | |
| | error pages move than a decade ago, when they were en vogue, and | |
| | it kills me every time to see them still there. And, of course, | |
| | the parallax effect has been removed, so now it's just sort of a | |
| | dorky Star Wars or Looney Tunes reference without a lot behind | |
| | it. Weird. | |
| | ada0000 wrote: | |
| | > vying with Microsoft for the "worst maintainer of links on the | |
| | entire Web" trophy | |
| | | |
| | Anybody who has tried to read Microsoft's dev blogs know they've | |
| | earned that trophy. Raymond Chen's articles are excellent, but go | |
| | back a few years and every single link is broken. They're using | |
| | WordPress at the moment but don't use slugs and never bothered to | |
| | rewrite old URLs from whatever they used to use. | |
| | | |
| | As an aside, I also worry that a software company can't make a | |
| | working cookie banner for WordPress. | |
| ___________________________________________________________________ | |
| (page generated 2026-01-13 05:04 UTC) |