Independent Submission                                          K. Leung
Request for Comments: 5563                                    G. Dommety
Category: Informational                                    Cisco Systems
ISSN: 2070-1721                                                P. Yegani
                                                       Juniper Networks
                                                           K. Chowdhury
                                                       Starent Networks
                                                          February 2010


                WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 Proxy Mobile IPv4

Abstract

  Mobile IPv4 is a standard mobility protocol that enables an IPv4
  device to move among networks while maintaining its IP address.  The
  mobile device has the Mobile IPv4 client function to signal its
  location to the routing anchor, known as the Home Agent.  However,
  there are many IPv4 devices without such capability due to various
  reasons.  This document describes Proxy Mobile IPv4 (PMIPv4), a
  scheme based on having the Mobile IPv4 client function in a network
  entity to provide mobility support for an unaltered and mobility-
  unaware IPv4 device.  This document also describes a particular
  application of PMIPv4 as specified in the WiMAX Forum and another
  application that is to be adopted in 3GPP2.

Status of This Memo

  This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
  published for informational purposes.

  This is a contribution to the RFC Series, independently of any other
  RFC stream.  The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at
  its discretion and makes no statement about its value for
  implementation or deployment.  Documents approved for publication by
  the RFC Editor are not a candidate for any level of Internet
  Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.

  Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
  and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
  http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5563.










Leung, et al.                 Informational                     [Page 1]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


Copyright Notice

  Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
  document authors.  All rights reserved.

  This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
  Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
  (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
  publication of this document.  Please review these documents
  carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
  to this document.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction ....................................................3
  2. Conventions Used in This Document ...............................4
  3. Benefits of Proxy Mobile IPv4 ...................................6
  4. Overview of Proxy Mobile IPv4 ...................................7
     4.1. Mobility Signaling for Mobile Device .......................7
          4.1.1. Proxy Registration during Initial Network
                 Attachment ..........................................8
          4.1.2. Proxy Registration Renewal .........................11
          4.1.3. Proxy Handover Support .............................12
          4.1.4. Resource Cleanup ...................................13
     4.2. Establishment of a Bi-Directional Tunnel ..................14
          4.2.1. Packet Forwarding ..................................14
          4.2.2. Broadcast and Multicast ............................14
          4.2.3. Forwarding between Devices on the Same PMA .........15
     4.3. Security Association between the PMA and the HA ...........15
     4.4. Registration Sequencing ...................................15
     4.5. Mobile Device Interface Configuration .....................16
     4.6. Dynamic HA Discovery ......................................16
  5. Proxy Mobile IPv4 Extensions ...................................16
     5.1. PMIPv4 Per-Node Authentication Method Extension ...........17
     5.2. Proxy Mobile IPv4 Interface ID Extension ..................18
     5.3. Proxy Mobile IPv4 Device ID Extension .....................18
     5.4. Proxy Mobile IPv4 Subscriber ID Extension .................19
     5.5. PMIPv4 Access Technology Type Extension ...................20
  6. Appearance of Being at Home Network ............................22
     6.1. ARP Considerations ........................................22
     6.2. ICMP Considerations .......................................23
     6.3. DHCP Considerations .......................................23
     6.4. PPP IPCP Considerations ...................................24
     6.5. Link-Local Multicast and Broadcast Considerations .........24
  7. Proxy Mobility Agent Operation .................................24
  8. Home Agent Operation ...........................................25
     8.1. Processing Proxy Registration Requests ....................26




Leung, et al.                 Informational                     [Page 2]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  9. Mobile Device Operation ........................................26
     9.1. Initial Network Access ....................................27
     9.2. Mobile Device Mobility ....................................27
     9.3. Sending and Receiving Packets .............................27
  10. Proxy Mobile IPv4 Use Case in WiMAX ...........................28
     10.1. Proxy Mobile IPv4 Call Flow Examples with Split
           PMA in WiMAX .............................................31
  11. Proxy Mobile IPv4 Use Case in 3GPP2 ...........................33
     11.1. Handover Considerations in 3GPP2 .........................36
  12. IANA Considerations ...........................................37
     12.1. Mobile IPv4 Extension Types ..............................38
     12.2. Mobile IPv4 Error Codes ..................................38
  13. Security Considerations .......................................38
  14. Acknowledgements ..............................................38
  15. References ....................................................39
     15.1. Normative References .....................................39
     15.2. Informative References ...................................39

1.  Introduction

  There are many IPv4 devices that do not have or cannot be enabled
  with Mobile IPv4 [RFC3344] functionality.  Yet, mobility for them is
  essential.  Proxy Mobile IPv4 provides mobility support without
  "touching" these devices.  The scheme is based on network entities
  that perform the mobility-management function for a mobile device.
  The location of the device is signaled by the network element on the
  access network (referred to as the Proxy Mobility Agent (PMA)) to
  inform the network entity on the home network (referred to as the
  Home Agent (HA)) associated with the IPv4 address used by the device.
  Mobile IPv4 messaging is used by the PMA and HA, which correspond to
  the RFC 3344 entities Mobile Node (in proxy mode) and Home Agent,
  respectively.

  These are some examples of Proxy Mobile IPv4:

  1.  A Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) access point or cellular
      base station performs registration with the Home Agent when a
      mobile device is associated on the air-link.

  2.  An access router or Foreign Agent performs registration with the
      Home Agent when a mobile device is detected on the network.

  Mobile IPv4 is used by the network entities because the mobility
  protocol has the functions needed to set up the route and tunneling
  endpoints for the mobile device's IP address and to deliver
  configuration parameters (e.g., DNS server addresses, default
  gateway) for enabling the mobile device's IP stack.  When Mobile IPv4
  is used in this way, the security association is between the PMA and



Leung, et al.                 Informational                     [Page 3]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  the HA because these entities are the signaling endpoints.  Also,
  when the mobile device moves to a new PMA, the sequencing of messages
  sourced from multiple PMAs needs to be handled properly by the HA.

  This document describes how the network entities, PMA and HA, provide
  mobility management for the mobile device.  It is organized to cover
  the generic functionality of Proxy Mobile IPv4 and also the specifics
  pertaining to WiMAX (Section 10) and 3GPP2 (Section 11).

  Note that Proxy Mobile IPv6 [RFC5213] is an IETF standard for
  network-based mobility management that enables IP mobility for a host
  without requiring its participation in any mobility-related
  signaling.

2.  Conventions Used in This Document

  The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
  "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
  document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

  The following new terminology and abbreviations are introduced in
  this document; all other general mobility-related terms are as
  defined in Mobile IPv4 specification [RFC3344].

  Mobile Device

     The mobile device is used to refer to an IPv4 device with its
     mobility provided by the network.  The mobile device is not
     required to participate in any mobility-related signaling for
     achieving mobility for an obtained IP address.

  Proxy Mobile IPv4 Client (PMIPv4 Client)

     This network function is responsible for initiating and
     maintaining the Proxy Mobile IPv4 registration on behalf of the
     mobile device.  Essentially, it performs the Mobile IPv4 client
     function but is hosted in the network.  In some cases, this
     function is collocated with the Foreign Agent; in others, it is
     not.  In both cases, Proxy Mobile IPv4 registration still goes via
     the Foreign Agent at all practical effects, even if it is internal
     to the node.

  Home Agent (HA)

     The Home Agent that is defined in Mobile IPv4 [RFC3344] is used in
     the Proxy Mobile IPv4 scheme.  It is the topological anchor point
     for the mobile device's home network and is the entity that
     manages the mobile device's reachability state.  The additional



Leung, et al.                 Informational                     [Page 4]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


     capabilities for supporting Proxy Mobile IPv4 in the Home Agent
     are defined in this document.

  Foreign Agent (FA)

     The Foreign Agent that is defined in [RFC3344] is used in the
     Proxy Mobile IPv4 scheme.  It is either collocated with or
     separate from the PMIPv4 client.  It serves the purpose of tunnel
     endpoint from Proxy Mobile IPv4 perspective.

  Access Router (AR)

     Access Router is a commonly used term that refers to the node in
     the network that connects the hosts to the IP network.

  Proxy Mobility Agent (PMA)

     Proxy Mobility Agent is the logical entity in the network that
     encompasses both the PMIPv4 client and the FA functions.  The
     PMIPv4 client and the FA collocation in the Access Router
     constitute an integrated PMA.  When the PMIPv4 client and the FA
     functions are not collocated in the Access Router, it is referred
     to as a split PMA.  A PMIPv4 client may have association with
     multiple FAs, and vice versa.

  Proxy Registration Request (PRRQ)

     The Registration Request message is sent by the Proxy Mobility
     Agent to the Home Agent in order to set up a mobility binding
     entry for a mobile device.  The message format is identical to
     that of the Mobile IPv4 Registration Request, though the Proxy
     Mobile IPv4 extensions that are defined in this document may be
     included for enhanced features of network-based mobility
     management.

  Proxy Registration Reply (PRRP)

     The Registration Reply message is sent by the Home Agent in
     response to the Proxy Registration Request received from the Proxy
     Mobility Agent.  The message format is identical to that of the
     Mobile IPv4 Registration Reply, though the Proxy Mobile IPv4
     extensions that are defined in this document may be included for
     enhanced features of network-based mobility management.








Leung, et al.                 Informational                     [Page 5]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


3.  Benefits of Proxy Mobile IPv4

  Proxy Mobile IPv4 (PMIPv4) is designed to satisfy the requirements
  listed below.  In addition, while this specification and Proxy Mobile
  IPv4 are not standards, they employ a standard: Mobile IPv4.
  Implementations of Mobile IPv4 can be re-used (i.e., a client-based
  mobility protocol can be used "as-is" to support network-based
  mobility).  However, new PMIPv4 extensions that are added to Mobile
  IPv4 improves the flexibility of the solution.  The practical
  advantage of having a common mobility protocol for both client-based
  and network-based mobility is that a Home Agent can anchor all types
  of mobile devices, both ones that have and ones that lack the Mobile
  IPv4 function.

  The network-based mobility management solution defined in this
  document has the following significant reasons for its use in any
  wireless network:

  1.  Support for Unmodified Hosts

      An overwhelming majority of IPv4 hosts do not have Mobile IPv4
      capability.  Providing mobility for them is achievable using
      Proxy Mobile IPv4.  This is accomplished without "touching" the
      user's devices by running on a myriad of operating systems and
      networking stacks.

  2.  Re-Use of Existing Home Agent

      An existing Home Agent implementation can be used for network-
      based mobility as well.  Further enhancements are optional and
      only incremental in nature.  There are many commonalities between
      client-based and network-based mobility, and sharing the same
      protocol is a significant benefit.

  3.  Reduction of Air-Link Resource Consumption

      Mobility-related signaling over the air-link is eliminated.

  4.  Support for Heterogeneous Wireless Link Technologies

      Since Proxy Mobile IPv4 is based on an access, technology-
      independent, mobility protocol, it can be used for any type of
      access network.

      From the network perspective, a mobile device is identified by
      the Network Access Identifier (NAI) and the forwarding is set up
      between the PMA and HA for the mobile device's current point of
      attachment on the network.  The mobile device may be attached to



Leung, et al.                 Informational                     [Page 6]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


      multiple networks concurrently, although the network treats each
      access interface independently.  This feature can be supported
      with the use of the PMIPv4 Access Technology Type Extension
      (Section 5.5).

  5.  Support for IPv4 and IPv6 Hosts

      As IPv6 increases in popularity, the host will likely be dual
      stack.  Adding IPv6 support to the host for Proxy Mobile IPv4
      involves the methods defined in [RFC5454].  There are additional
      enhancements needed, which are described in "Proxy Mobile IPv6"
      [RFC5213].  However, support for an IPv6 host is out of the scope
      of this document.

4.  Overview of Proxy Mobile IPv4

4.1.  Mobility Signaling for Mobile Device

  After the mobile device completes network-access authentication, the
  PMA exchanges Proxy Mobile IPv4 registration messages with the HA to
  set up proper routing and tunneling of packets from/to the Mobile
  Node.  The PMIPv4 client is responsible for initiating the Proxy
  Mobile IPv4 registration.  For integrated PMA, the PMIPv4 client and
  the FA interaction is all within the node.  In the case of split PMA
  implementation, the interactions between the PMIPv4 client and the FA
  are exposed.  The interface between the PMIP Client and the FA in the
  split PMA scenario is defined in a standards organization
  specification [NWG] and is consequently out of the scope of this
  document.

  The following call flows describe the operations of Proxy Mobile
  IPv4.  The initial network attachment, registration renewal, and
  resource cleanup procedures are covered.  Note that the protocols
  that interact with Proxy Mobile IP are identified and explained in
  more detail.  The PPP/IPCP (IP Control Protocol) protocol involves a
  PPP client in the mobile device and a Network Access Server (NAS) in
  the AR.  DHCP involves a DHCP client in the MN and a DHCP server in
  either the AR or the HA.  PMIPv4 involves a PMA in the AR and an HA
  in the router on the home network.  The Authentication,
  Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) protocol involves a AAA client in
  the AR and a AAA server in the network.  The collocation of the
  functional entities in the AR/HA enables parameters to be
  shared/processed among the protocols.

  When the various network entities are not collocated, any sharing of
  parameters or other state information between them is out of the
  scope of this document.




Leung, et al.                 Informational                     [Page 7]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


4.1.1.  Proxy Registration during Initial Network Attachment

               +----+        +-------+      +-------+      +-----+
               |    |        | AR /  |      |       |      |     |
               | MN |        | PMA   |      |  AAA  |      |  HA |
               |    |        |       |      |       |      |     |
               +----+        +-------+      +-------+      +-----+
                  |               |             |             |
                  |     1a        |     1b      |             |
  Authentication  |<------------->|<----------->|             |
                  |               |             |             |
                  |     2         |             |             |
             +->  |-------------->|             |             |
             |    |               |       3     |             |
             |    |               |-------------------------->| <-+
  Address    |    |               |             |             |   |PMIP
  Acquisition|    |               |       4     |             |   |
             |    |               |<--------------------------| <-+
             |    |     5         |             |             |
             +->  |<--------------|             |             |
                  |               |             |             |
                  |     6         |             |             |
  Data Forwarding |<------------->|<=========================>|
                  |               |             |             |

                   Figure 1: Network Connection Setup

  The initial network-attachment procedure is described below.  There
  are three distinct phases.  First, authentication and authorization
  happen when the mobile device accesses the network.  Then, the mobile
  device attempts to obtain an IP address.  This triggers Proxy Mobile
  IP, which assigns/authorizes the IP address and sets up forwarding
  between the PMA and HA.  The host configuration parameters may be
  passed in the PMIPv4 signaling.  Finally, the mobile device
  configures its IP stack with the IP address and the obtained host
  configuration.  Packets to and from the mobile device transit both
  the PMA and HA.

  1a.  The mobile device establishes a L2 (Layer 2) link with the base
       station (not shown) and performs access
       authentication/authorization with the AR (Access Router).
       During this phase, the mobile device may run either the
       Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP) [RFC1994] if
       PPP [RFC1661] is used or the Extensible Authentication Protocol
       (EAP) [RFC3748] over foo (foo being the specific access
       technology, or PANA [RFC4058]).  The AR acts as the NAS (Network
       Access Server) in this step.




Leung, et al.                 Informational                     [Page 8]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  1b.  The AAA client exchanges AAA messages with the AAA
       infrastructure to perform authentication and authorization of
       the mobile device.  As part of this step, the AAA server may
       download some information about the mobile device (e.g., the
       user's profile, handset type, assigned Home Agent address, and
       other capabilities of the mobile device).

  2.   The mobile device requests an IP address via a PPP/IPCP
       [RFC1332] or DHCP [RFC2131].  Specifically for PPP, the PPP
       client sends an IPCP Configure-Request to the NAS.  As for DHCP,
       the DHCP client sends the DHCP Discover message to the DHCP
       relay agent/ server.

       For the DHCP case, the DHCP server or DHCP relay agent sends the
       DHCP Ack message to the DHCP client after PMIPv4 signaling has
       completed.

  3.   Triggered by step 2, the PMA sends a Proxy Registration Request
       (PRRQ) to the HA.  The HA's IP address is either obtained from
       the AAA server at step 1b or discovered by some other method.
       The PRRQ contains the Care-of Address (CoA) of the PMA (the
       collocated FA in this case).  The Home Address field is set to
       zero or the IP address is specified as a hint in the DHCP or
       IPCP message.  The PRRQ MUST be protected by the methods
       described in the Security Considerations (Section 13) of this
       document.  The derivation and distribution of the MN-HA or FA-HA
       key is outside the scope of this document.

  4.   The Home Agent sets up the mobility binding entry for the mobile
       device after assigning an IP address or authorizing the
       requested Home Address.  The Home Agent may also assign a
       Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) key in this step (if GRE
       tunneling is used between the PMA and HA).  The HA returns the
       Home Address and the GRE key (if applicable) in the Proxy
       Registration Reply (PRRP) to the PMA.  If the requested Home
       Address is not authorized, the Home Agent denies the
       registration with error code 129 (administratively prohibited).
       After the PMA processes the PRRP, the forwarding path for the
       Home Address between the PMA and HA is established.  A GRE
       tunnel may be used between the PMA and the HA [MIP4GREKEY].
       This event completes the Proxy Mobile IPv4 signaling for initial
       network attachment.

  5.   After the Proxy Mobile IPv4 registration exchange, the AR
       provides the IP address to the mobile device in response to step
       2.  For IPCP, the NAS replies to the PPP client with an IPCP
       Configure-Nak, which includes the PMIPv4-assigned Home Address




Leung, et al.                 Informational                     [Page 9]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


       in the IP address configuration option and the DNS server
       address in the IPCP configuration option.

       The following procedure happens when the DHCP server is on the
       AR.  The DHCP server sends a DHCP Offer with the PMIPv4-assigned
       Home Address in the yiaddr field to the DHCP client.  The DHCP
       client sends a DHCP Request to the DHCP server, which replies
       with a DHCP Ack.  The host configuration (such as the DNS server
       address) is included in the DHCP options in the message.  Note
       that the DHCP messages are exchanged directly between the DHCP
       client and the DHCP server.

       In the case when AR acts as a DHCP relay agent, the DHCP
       Discover is relayed to the DHCP server on the HA.  The DHCP
       server sends a DHCP Offer with the PMIPv4-assigned Home Address
       in the yiaddr field to the DHCP relay agent, which forwards it
       to the DHCP client.  The DHCP Request and DHCP Ack messages are
       exchanged between the DHCP client and DHCP server via the DHCP
       relay agent.  Regardless of the sequence of PMIPv4 signaling and
       DHCP exchanges, the interaction between PMIPv4 and DHCP involves
       in the same IP address for Home Address field and yiaddr field,
       respectively.

  6.   At this step, the mobile device's IP stack is configured with an
       IP address that has a forwarding path between the AR/PMA and HA.
       Also, the host configuration (such as DNS servers) is configured
       at this time.  Now that the IPCP or DHCP procedure has
       completed, the mobile device is ready to receive or send IP
       packets.  If DHCP is used, the DHCP client renews the IP address
       by sending a DHCP Request directly to the DHCP server.  The
       lease for the IP address is extended when a DHCP Ack from the
       DHCP server is received by the DHCP client.



















Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 10]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


4.1.2.  Proxy Registration Renewal

                   +----+        +-------+                  +-----+
                   |    |        | AR /  |                  |     |
                   | MN |        | PMA   |                  |  HA |
                   |    |        |       |                  |     |
                   +----+        +-------+                  +-----+
                      |               |                        |
                      |               |       1                |
                      |               |----------------------->|
    PMIPv4            |               |                        |
    Renewal           |               |       2                |
                      |               |<-----------------------|
                      |               |                        |
                      |               |                        |

                Figure 2: Network Connection Maintenance

  The network-connection maintenance procedure is described below.  As
  long as the mobile device remains attached to the AR, the Proxy
  Mobile IPv4 session is maintained by re-registration exchanges
  between the AR and HA.

  1.  Before the PMIPv4 registration lifetime expires, and assuming the
      AR has not received any indication that the mobile device
      detached from the network, the PMA sends a PRRQ to the HA to
      extend the duration of the mobility binding of the mobile device.
      This PRRQ is similar to the initial PRRQ (i.e., HA field set to
      the assigned HA, and CoA field set to the PMA), though the Home
      Address field is always set to the assigned IP address of the
      mobile device.  The mobile device's IP stack can continue to send
      and receive IP packets using the Home Address anchored at the HA.

  2.  The HA sends the PRRP in response to the PRRQ received from the
      PMA.  After the PMA processes the PRRP, the forwarding path
      between AR and HA remains intact.















Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 11]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


4.1.3.  Proxy Handover Support

                   +----+        +-------+      +-------+      +-----+
                   |    |        | New   |      |  Old  |      |     |
                   | MN |        | AR /  |      |  AR / |      |  HA |
                   |    |        | PMA   |      |  PMA  |      |     |
                   +----+        +-------+      +-------+      +-----+
                      |               |             |             |
                      |     1         |             |             |
    Authentication    |<------------->|             |             |
                      |               |             |             |
                      |               |       2     |             |
                 +->  |               |-------------------------->|
    PMIPv4       |    |               |             |             |
                 |    |               |       3     |             |
                 +->  |               |<--------------------------|
                      |               |             |             |
                      |     4         |             |             |
    Data Forwarding   |<------------->|<=========================>|
                      |               |             |             |

                          Figure 3: AR Handover

  The AR handover procedure is described below.  There are three
  phases.  First, authentication and authorization happen when the
  mobile device attaches to the new AR in the network.  The successful
  authentication triggers the Proxy Mobile IPv4 signaling.  In the last
  phase, the forwarding path between the new AR and HA is set up for
  the mobile device to send and receive IP packets using the same Home
  Address anchored at the HA.

  1.  The mobile device establishes L2 link with the base station (not
      shown) and performs access authentication/authorization with the
      new AR, using the security method for network re-attachment.

  2.  Triggered by successful authentication, the PMA sends a PRRQ to
      the HA.  The HA's IP address is typically obtained or is known by
      the method used for fast re-authentication during AR handover
      (e.g., context transfer between the two ARs), though other
      methods may be used.  The PRRQ contains the CoA of the new PMA.
      The Home Address field is set to zero or the assigned IP address
      of the mobile device.  The IP address is also obtained/known by
      the same method mentioned before.

  3.  The Home Agent updates the existing mobility binding entry for
      the mobile device upon processing the PRRQ.  The Home Agent
      returns the Home Address, fetched from the binding, in the PRRP
      to the new PMA.  After the PMA processes the PRRP, the forwarding



Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 12]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


      path for the Home Address between the new AR and HA is
      established.  The event completes the Proxy Mobile IPv4 signaling
      for AR handover.

  4.  At this step, which happens around the same time as step 2, the
      mobile device's IP stack may detect L2 link going down and up
      after access re-authentication.  The mobile device's IP stack may
      attempt to validate its IP address connectivity.  See Sections
      6.1, 6.2, and 6.3 of this document for considerations on ARP
      [RFCARP], ICMP [RFCICMP], and DHCP [RFC2131], respectively.
      Because the forwarding path is established between the new PMA
      and HA, the mobile device can receive or send IP packets using
      the Home Address.

4.1.4.  Resource Cleanup

                   +----+        +-------+      +-------+      +-----+
                   |    |        | New   |      |  Old  |      |     |
                   | MN |        | AR /  |      |  AR / |      |  HA |
                   |    |        | PMA   |      |  PMA  |      |     |
                   +----+        +-------+      +-------+      +-----+
                      |               |             |             |
                      |               |             |      1      |
                 +->  |               |             |<------------|
                 |    |               |             |             |
    Revocation   |    |               |             o 2           |
                 |    |               |             |             |
                 |    |               |             |      3      |
                 +->  |               |             |------------>|
                      |               |             |             |

           Figure 4: Registration Revocation for Previous PMA

  The resource cleanup procedure for the old AR is described below.
  This cleanup is necessary when the old AR needs to delete its PMIPv4
  and other associated states for a mobile device that has moved to
  another AR.  Therefore, this is an optional procedure for Proxy
  Mobile IP.  The alternative method is based on the new PMA notifying
  the old PMA to clean up resources.  The alternative method is out of
  the scope of this document.

  1.  Triggered by the update of the mobility binding entry for a
      mobile device that has moved to a new AR, the HA may send a
      Registration Revocation (as specified in RFC 3543 [RFC3543]) to
      the old PMA (i.e., specifically to the Foreign Agent entity) in
      order to clean up unused resources in an expeditious manner.





Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 13]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  2.  The old PMA removes the PMIPv4 states for the mobile device.

  3.  The old PMA sends revocation acknowledgement to the HA.

4.2.  Establishment of a Bi-Directional Tunnel

  The PMA and HA set up a tunnel between them for the Home Address
  after the PMIPv4 registration message exchange.

4.2.1.  Packet Forwarding

  The bi-directional tunnel between the PMA and the HA allows packets
  to flow in both directions, while the mobile device is connected on
  the visited network.  All traffic to and from the mobile device
  travels through this tunnel.

  While the PMA is serving a mobile device, it MUST be able to
  intercept all packets sent from the mobile device and forward them
  out the tunnel created for supporting that mobile device.  Typically,
  forwarding is based on layer 2 information such as the source Media
  Access Control (MAC) address or ingress interface.  This allows
  overlapping IP addresses to be supported for the packet from the
  mobile device.  For example, the PMA forwards packets from mobile
  devices with the same IP address to the tunnel associated with each
  mobile device, based on the source MAC address.

  The PMA de-encapsulates any packets received on the tunnel from the
  HA before forwarding to the mobile device on its link.  Typically,
  the forwarding is based on the destination IP address and ingress HA
  tunnel (which may have a GRE key).  This allows overlapping IP
  addresses to be supported for the packet destined to the mobile
  device.  For example, the PMA forwards packets to mobile devices with
  the same IP address to the link associated with each mobile device,
  based on the GRE key value of the tunnel created for the HA that
  serves these mobile devices.

  The tunnel operation between the PMA and HA is the same as between
  the FA and HA in RFC 3344.  The IP TTL (Time to Live), fragmentation,
  re-assembly, etc. logic remain the same.  The tunnel mode is IPinIP
  by default or GRE as an option.

4.2.2.  Broadcast and Multicast

  Broadcast packet processing for DHCP and ARP (Address Resolution
  Protocol) messages are described in Section 6.3 and Section 6.1,
  respectively.  For other types of broadcast packets, the PMA and HA





Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 14]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  process them in accordance to [RFC3344], [RFC3024], and [MIP4MCBC].
  Only the Direct Encapsulation Delivery Style is supported, as there
  is no encapsulation for the packets between the mobile device and
  PMA.

4.2.3.  Forwarding between Devices on the Same PMA

  When the communication peers are both attached to the same PMA, the
  packet is forwarded as specified in Section 4.2.1.  The traffic
  between them should be routed via the HA without taking a local
  shortcut on the PMA.  This ensures that data-traffic enforcement at
  the HA is not bypassed.

4.3.  Security Association between the PMA and the HA

  The security relationship for protecting the control message
  exchanges between the PMA and the HA may be either per node (i.e.,
  same security association for all mobile devices) or per MN (i.e.,
  unique security association per mobile device).  The method of
  obtaining the security association is outside the scope of this
  document.

  For per-node SA support, the FA-HA Authentication extension or IPsec
  (indicated in the PMIPv4 extension) is used to authenticate the
  signaling messages (including Registration Revocation [RFC3543])
  between PMA and HA.  In the case of IPsec, Encapsulating Security
  Payload (ESP) [RFC4303] in transport mode with mandatory integrity
  protection should be used.  The IPsec endpoints are the IP addresses
  of the PMA and HA.

  For per-MN SA support, the MN-HA Authentication extension and/or MN-
  AAA Authentication extension are used to authenticate the signaling.

  The creation of the security association may be assisted by the AAA
  server at the time of access authentication.

4.4.  Registration Sequencing

  The Identification field in the registration message provides replay
  protection and sequencing when the timestamp method is used.  This
  mechanism allows the HA to know the sequence of messages from the
  same PMA or different PMAs based on the Identification field.  The HA
  can also synchronize the PMA's clock by using the Identification
  mismatch error code in the Proxy Registration Reply.  This reply
  message would not be necessary when the PMA's clocks are synchronized
  using the Network Time Protocol [RFC1305] or some other method.  Note
  that the use of nonce for sequencing and replay protection is outside
  the scope of this document.



Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 15]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  The method above is sufficient when there is a single source for
  signaling as in the split PMA case.  However, in the integrated PMA
  case, the Proxy Registration Request is sent from different sources
  (i.e., different PMAs).  If the previous PMA is unaware that the
  mobile device has moved away and continues to send re-registration,
  then the HA would be misinformed on the location of the device.
  Therefore, an integrated PMA MUST confirm that the mobile device is
  still attached before sending a Proxy Registration Request.

  Note that, for the split PMA model as used in WiMAX Forum (see
  Section 10), the PMIPv4 client remains anchored during handover (see
  Section 10.1).  In this case, the PMIPv4 client is the only source of
  the PRRQ.  However, there are cases (such as PMIPv4 client relocation
  and uncontrolled handover events) when more than one PMA performs
  registration.  The same method for the integrated PMA is used to
  ensure proper sequencing of registration on the HA.

4.5.  Mobile Device Interface Configuration

  Typically, the mobile device's interface needs to be configured with
  an IP address, network prefix, default gateway, and DNS server
  addresses before the network connection can be enabled to be used for
  communication.  For some IP stacks, the default gateway IP address
  has to be on the same subnet as the mobile device's IP address.  When
  the Home Agent's IP address is not on the same subnet as the Home
  Address, vendor-specific extensions (e.g., [RFC4332]) or other
  methods MAY be used by the PMA to obtain the default gateway.

4.6.  Dynamic HA Discovery

  The PMA can perform dynamic HA discovery by sending the registration
  with Home Agent field set to 0.0.0.0 or 255.255.255.255.  The Home
  Agent responds with its IP address in the Home Agent field as
  specified in "Mobile IPv4 Dynamic Home Agent (HA) Assignment"
  [RFC4433].

5.  Proxy Mobile IPv4 Extensions

  The following PMIPv4 extensions are not required for base
  functionality but may be used in some cases where such features are
  applicable.  They are included before the authentication extension
  (e.g., MN-HA or FA-HA Authentication extension) in the registration
  message.








Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 16]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


5.1.  PMIPv4 Per-Node Authentication Method Extension

  The Proxy Mobile IPv4 Authentication Method extension indicates
  alternative methods for authenticating the registration besides the
  default MN-HA Authentication extension as specified in RFC 3344.
  This extension MUST be included in the Registration Request and
  Registration Reply when the security association for authenticating
  the message is between the PMA and HA on a per-node basis.  This
  means that a common key or set of keys (indexed by the SPI) are used
  for message authentication by the PMA and HA.  The key is independent
  of the mobile device, which is identified in the registration.

     0               1               2               3
     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    |     Type      |   Sub-Type    |             Length            |
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    |    Method     |
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

             PMIPv4 Per-Node Authentication Method Extension

     Type

        47 (Proxy Mobile IPv4 Non-Skippable Extension)

     Sub-Type

        1 (PMIPv4 Per-Node Authentication Method)

     Length

        1

     Method

        An 8-bit field that specifies the authentication type for
        protecting the signaling messages.

        The values (0 - 255) are allocated and managed by IANA.  The
        following values have been assigned to the specified method
        types.

        0: Reserved

        1: FA-HA Authentication

        2: IPsec Authentication



Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 17]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


5.2.  Proxy Mobile IPv4 Interface ID Extension

  The Proxy Mobile IPv4 Interface ID extension identifies the interface
  address of the device used to attach to the network.  The information
  MAY be included in the Registration Request when the PMA is aware of
  it.

    0               1               2               3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Type      |   Length      | Sub-Type      | Identifier ...
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                      PMIPv4 Interface ID Extension

     Type

        147 (Proxy Mobile IPv4 Skippable Extension)

     Length

        The length of the extension in octets, excluding Type and
        Length fields.

     Sub-Type

        1 (PMIPv4 Interface ID)

     Identifier

        A variable-length octet sequence that contains an identifier of
        the interface.

5.3.  Proxy Mobile IPv4 Device ID Extension

  The Proxy Mobile IPv4 Device ID extension identifies the device used
  to connect to the network.  The information MAY be included in the
  Registration Request when the PMA is aware of it.

    0               1               2               3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Type      |   Length      | Sub-Type      |    ID-Type    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           Identifier ...
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                       PMIPv4 Device ID Extension



Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 18]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


     Type

        147 (Proxy Mobile IPv4 Skippable Extension)

     Length

        The length of the extension in octets, excluding Type and
        Length fields.

     Sub-Type

        2 (PMIPv4 Device ID)

     ID-Type

        An 8-bit field that specifies the device ID type.

        The values (0 - 255) are allocated and managed by IANA.  The
        following values have been assigned to the specified device ID
        types.

        0: Reserved

        1: Ethernet MAC address

        2: Mobile Equipment Identifier (MEID)

        3: International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI)

        4: Electronic Serial Number (ESN)

     Identifier

        A variable-length octet sequence that contains an identifier of
        the type indicated by the ID-Type field.

5.4.  Proxy Mobile IPv4 Subscriber ID Extension

  The Proxy Mobile IPv4 Subscriber ID extension identifies the mobile
  subscription.  The information MAY be included in the Registration
  Request when the PMA is aware of it.










Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 19]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


    0               1               2               3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Type      |   Length      | Sub-Type      |    ID-Type    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                           Identifier ...
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                     PMIPv4 Subscriber ID Extension

     Type

        147 (Proxy Mobile IPv4 Skippable Extension)

     Length

        The length of the extension in octets, excluding Type and
        Length fields.

     Sub-Type

        3 (PMIPv4 Subscriber ID)

     ID-Type

        An 8-bit field that specifies the subscriber ID type.

        The values (0 - 255) are allocated and managed by IANA.  The
        following values have been assigned to the specified subscriber
        ID types.

        0: Reserved

        1: International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI)

     Identifier

        A variable-length octet sequence that contains an identifier of
        the type indicated by the ID-Type field.

5.5.  PMIPv4 Access Technology Type Extension

  The Proxy Mobile IPv4 Access Technology Type extension indicates the
  type of radio-access technology on which the mobile device is
  attached.  This extension MAY be included in the Registration Request
  when the PMA is aware of the information.  The HA can provide
  mobility on the same access technology type for a mobile device with




Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 20]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  multiple interfaces, assuming each interface is connected on a
  different access technology type.  The HA does not include the
  extension in the associated Registration Reply.

    0               1               2               3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |     Type      |   Length      | Sub-Type      |   Tech-Type   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                 PMIPv4 Access Technology Type Extension

     Type

        147 (Proxy Mobile IPv4 Skippable Extension)

     Length

        2

     Sub-Type

        4 (Access Technology Type)

     Tech-Type

        An 8-bit field that specifies the access technology through
        which the mobile device is connected to the access network.

        The values (0 - 255) are allocated and managed by IANA.  The
        following values have been assigned to the specified access
        technology types.

        0: Reserved

        1: 802.3

        2: 802.11a/b/g

        3: 802.16e

        4: 802.16m

        5: 3GPP EUTRAN/LTE

        6: 3GPP UTRAN/GERAN





Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 21]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


        7: 3GPP2 1xRTT/HRPD

        8: 3GPP2 UMB

6.  Appearance of Being at Home Network

  Since the Mobile Node is not aware of its mobility and does not
  participate in handover signaling, the network entities emulate the
  home network to the mobile device attached on the network.  From the
  mobile device's perspective, it operates as if it were at the home
  network.  However, the network is directing the mobile device's
  traffic to and from its current location and will continue to do so
  when it moves to a new location.

  An unmodified mobile device on a shared link learns the MAC address
  of another host on the home network via ARP ([RFCARP]), obtains an IP
  address and other host configuration via DHCP ([RFC2131]), and sends
  link-local multicast and broadcast packets.  The network's response
  to the host is equivalent to the situation when a host is on the home
  network.  When the link state changes, some hosts use ARP, ICMP,
  and/or DHCP to detect if it has changed the point of attachment on
  the network.

6.1.  ARP Considerations

  For IEEE 802 type of access networks (e.g., WLAN, WiMAX Ethernet
  Convergence Sublayer), the mobile device sends ARP requests for the
  Corresponding Node (CN) and default gateway on the same network.  The
  purpose of maintaining an ARP entry is to allow the delivery of the
  packet from the mobile device to the CN using the destination MAC
  address.  The ARP procedure for resolving IP and MAC address mapping
  is not needed for 3GPP2's cdma2000 and WiMAX IP Convergence Sublayer
  networks.

  The access router is always the L2 endpoint for the mobile device.
  The destination MAC address in the packet does not need to be set to
  the CN's MAC address.  As long as the packet can be received by the
  access router, it will be forwarded toward the CN via the home
  network node (further details in Section 4.2.1).  The ARP table in
  the mobile device does not need to be populated with CNs' MAC
  addresses in order for the packet to reach the CNs.

  A mobile device has ARP entries for the default gateway and hosts on
  the same subnet.  Regardless of what the MAC addresses are, the AR
  receives the packets sent from the mobile device.






Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 22]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


6.2.  ICMP Considerations

  For movement detection, certain types of network stack on the mobile
  device will send an ICMP request [RFCICMP] to the default gateway
  after detecting the link went down and up.  The IP TTL in the message
  is set to 1 to check if the default gateway is still directly
  reachable on the access network.  The PMA MAY send an ICMP reply when
  it is providing Proxy Mobile IPv4 service for the mobile device.
  This response confirms to the mobile device that it has remained on
  the home network after link state change.  This behavior is observed
  on existing client implementation.  "Detecting Network Attachment in
  IPv4 (DNAv4)" [RFC4436] can be employed.

  General ICMP traffic is handled as normal IP packets and tunneled
  between the PMA and HA.

6.3.  DHCP Considerations

  DHCP [RFC2131] is used to obtain an IP address and other host
  configuration parameters for a mobile device.  The mobile device is
  expected to behave as a normal DHCP client when connected to the
  network with Proxy Mobile IPv4 service.  There are two DHCP phases:
  bootup and renewal/release.  The bootup procedure relies on the DHCP
  relay agent to obtain a lease on the IP address for the DHCP client
  from the DHCP server.  The DHCP client directly renews and releases
  the lease with the DHCP server.

  In Proxy Mobile IPv4, the mobile device boots up on a network that is
  not the home network associated with the leased IP address.  Also,
  the mobile device can move to other networks that are not related to
  that IP address.  Yet, the DHCP client on the mobile device continues
  to operate as a stationary device that is directly on the network
  associated with its IP address.  The PMA and HA create the
  transparency of the remote home network and mobility events by
  providing the expected network response to the DHCP client.

  There are several methods for the network infrastructure to interface
  with the mobile device such that the mobile device believes it is
  always fixed on the same network.  The following methods are
  identified here, though others may be used as well.

  DHCP Server in the AR:

     The mobile device boots up and initiates DHCP.  The procedure is
     described in Figure 1.  The DHCP client renews or releases the IP
     address directly with the DHCP server in the AR.  When the mobile
     device is on a different AR than the AR/DHCP server, the DHCP
     message from the client needs to be able to either be forwarded to



Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 23]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


     the DHCP server in the previous AR or handled by the DHCP server
     in the new AR.  When the DHCP lease time expires for the mobile
     device's IP address or the DHCP release message is received on the
     current AR, the AR sends PMIPv4 de-registration to the HA.

  DHCP Relay Agent in the AR:

     The mobile device boots up and initiates DHCP.  The procedure is
     described in Figure 1.  The DHCP client renews or releases the IP
     address directly with the DHCP server in the HA.  When the mobile
     device is on a different AR, DHCP messages from the client are
     relayed to the DHCP server in the HA.  When the DHCP lease time
     expires for the mobile device's IP address or the DHCP release
     message is received on the HA, the HA deletes the mobility binding
     entry for the mobile device and sends registration revocation
     [RFC3543] to the AR.

6.4.  PPP IPCP Considerations

  When the mobile device accesses the network via PPP [RFC1661], LCP
  (Link Control Protocol) CHAP is used to authenticate the user.  After
  authentication, the NAS (which is the AR/PMA) sends the Proxy Mobile
  IPv4 Registration Request to the HA.  The HA responds with the Home
  Address in the Proxy Registration Reply.  The NAS informs the mobile
  device to use the Home Address during IPCP [RFC1332].  When the
  mobile device moves to a new NAS, the same procedure happens and that
  mobile device has the same IP address for communication.

  The message exchange is illustrated in Figure 1.

6.5.  Link-Local Multicast and Broadcast Considerations

  Depending on configuration policies, the PMA may tunnel all packets
  destined to Link-Local Multicast or Broadcast to the HA.  The HA
  looks up the hosts that are in the same subnet and sends a duplicated
  packet to each of them.

7.  Proxy Mobility Agent Operation

  The PMA performs the functions of a Mobile Node entity as described
  in RFC 3344, with the exceptions identified below.

  -  No agent discovery (i.e., agent solicitation and advertisement) is
     supported.

  -  The D-bit (De-encapsulation by MN) in the Registration Request is
     always set to zero.




Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 24]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  The main responsibility of the PMA is to set up and maintain the
  routing path between itself and the HA for a mobile device that is
  attached on the network.  When it detects a mobile device is no
  longer attached, the routing path is torn down.  It is possible that
  the PMA functions may be split up in implementations such as WiMAX
  (Section 10).

  The PMA needs to know the following information, at a minimum, for
  sending a proxy registration:

  1.  NAI of the mobile device.

  2.  MN-HA security association, when per-mobile device security
      association is used.

  3.  FA-HA Mobility security association or IPsec security association
      when per-node security association is used.  Note that these
      associations are specific only between PMA and HA, and are
      cryptographically unrelated to the associations between the MN
      and other network nodes.

  4.  HA Address.

  This information is typically downloaded from the AAA server during
  access authentication.

8.  Home Agent Operation

  The Home Agent has the functionality described in RFC 3344 [RFC3344].
  In addition, the following features are introduced by Proxy Mobile
  IPv4:

  1.  Sequencing between PRRQs from multiple PMAs.  For the integrated
      PMA case, there is a period after handover that may result in
      both the new PMA and old PMA sending PRRQs.  It is imperative
      that the old PMA confirm that the mobile device is attached
      before sending a PRRQ when the re-registration timer expires.
      This would ensure that the HA only receives registration from the
      PMA that is serving the mobile device.

  2.  Authentication of PRRQs based on per-node security associations
      (FA-HA AE or IPsec AH/ESP) is applicable in the integrated PMA
      case.  The presence of MN-HA AE or MN-AAA AE in the PRRQ is not
      necessary in this case.  Since PMIPv4 is based on signaling
      between the PMA and the HA, the security for the message can be
      authenticated based on the peers' relationship.  The HA can
      authorize PMIPv4 service for the mobile device at the PMA by
      contacting the AAA server.



Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 25]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  3.  The ability to process the Proxy Mobile IPv4 extensions defined
      in this document for enhanced capabilities of PMIPv4.

8.1.  Processing Proxy Registration Requests

  When a Proxy Registration Request is received, the HA looks up the
  mobility binding entry indexed by the NAI.  If the entry exists, HA
  compares the sequence numbers between the message and mobility
  binding entry (MBE), if present.  If the value in the message is zero
  or greater than or equal to the one in the MBE, HA accepts the
  registration.  The HA replies with a sequence number that is one
  greater than the larger value of either the MBE or Proxy Registration
  Request.  If the registration is denied, then HA sends error code
  "Administratively prohibited (65)".  If the HA is not enabled with
  Proxy Mobile IPv4 or cannot process the Proxy Mobile IPv4 Extensions
  defined in this document, it sends a Registration Reply with error
  code PMIP_UNSUPPORTED ("Proxy Registration not supported by the HA").
  In the case when the PMA is not allowed to send a Proxy Registration
  Request to the HA, the HA sends a Proxy Registration Reply with error
  code PMIP_DISALLOWED ("Proxy Registrations from this PMA are not
  allowed").

  A PMA receiving these error codes SHOULD NOT retry sending Proxy
  Mobile IPv4 messages to the HA that sent replies with these error
  codes.

9.  Mobile Device Operation

  As per this specification, a mobile device would function as a normal
  IPv4 host.  The required behavior of the node will be consistent with
  the base IPv4 specification [RFC0791].  The mobile station will have
  the ability to retain its IPv4 address as it moves from one point of
  network attachment to the other without ever requiring it to
  participate in any mobility-related signaling.

  When booting up for the first time, a mobile device obtains an IPv4
  address using DHCP or IPCP.

  As the mobile device roams, it is always able to communicate using
  the obtained IP address on the home network.  The PMA on the
  currently attached network signals to the HA to ensure a proper
  forwarding path for the mobile device's traffic.









Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 26]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


9.1.  Initial Network Access

  When the mobile device accesses the network for the first time and
  attaches to a network on the PMA, it will present its identity in the
  form of an NAI to the network as part of the network-access
  authentication process.

  Once the address configuration is complete, the mobile device will
  always be able to use that IP address anywhere in the network.

9.2.  Mobile Device Mobility

  When a mobile device moves to a new PMA from another PMA, the
  following occurs:

  The mobile device may perform a network-access authentication with
  the new AR/PMA.  If the authentication fails, the mobile device will
  not be able to use the link.  After a successful authentication, the
  new PMA will have the identifier and the other profile data of the
  mobile device.  The new PMA can also obtain the mobile device's
  information using a context-transfer mechanism, which is out of the
  scope of this document.

  Once the network-access authentication process is complete, the
  mobile device may sense a change in the Link Layer and use ARP, DHCP,
  and/or ICMP to detect if it is still on the same subnet.  These
  mechanisms are handled by the network as described in "Appearance of
  Being At Home Network" (Section 6).

9.3.  Sending and Receiving Packets

  All packets that are to be sent from the mobile device to the
  Corresponding Node (CN) will be sent as normal IPv4 packets, setting
  the Source Address of the IPv4 header to the Home Address and the
  Destination Address to the Corresponding Node's IP address.  In Proxy
  Mobile IPv4 operation, the default gateway for the mobile device is
  set up to reach the PMA.

  Similarly, all packets sent to the mobile device's IP address by the
  Corresponding Node will be received by the mobile device in the
  original form (without any tunneling overhead).

  For Proxy Mobile IP, the packet from the mobile device is transported
  to the HA to reach the destination, regardless of the destination IP
  address.  For a CN with an IP address on the same network as the
  mobile device but that is physically located elsewhere, the HA will
  tunnel the packet to the CN.  Otherwise, the HA forwards the traffic
  via normal routing.



Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 27]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  No special operation is required by the mobile device to either send
  or receive packets.

  Mobile devices attached to the same PMA may be using different HAs
  for transporting their traffic.

10.  Proxy Mobile IPv4 Use Case in WiMAX

  WiMAX Forum Network Working Group (NWG) uses the Proxy Mobile IPv4
  scheme to provide IPv4 connectivity and IP mobility.  The relevant
  specification from WiMAX Forum is [NWG].

  The Proxy Mobile IPv4 protocol is used over NWG reference point 3
  (R3).  Most of the Proxy Mobile IPv4 related procedures and
  requirements are described in reference to mobility management over
  R3.

  The Proxy Mobile IPv4 use case in the WiMAX Forum specification is
  illustrated in the following diagram:
































Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 28]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


                                           |
                                           |            CSN
                                           |
                                           |
                    +-------+              |            +-------+
                    |       |              |            |       |
                    |AAAV   |--------------|------------| AAAH  |
                    |       |              |            |       |
                    |       |              |            |       |
                    +-------+              |            +-------+
                         |                 |                |
                         |                 |                |
                         |                 |                |
                 +------------------+      |                |
                 |   +-------+      |      |                |
                 |   | NAS   |      |      |                |
                 |   | PMIP  | ASN1 |      |                |
                 |   | Client|      |      |                |
                 |   +-------+      |      |                |
                 |       |          |      |                |
                 |       | R4       |      |                |
                 |   +-------+      |      |             +------+
        +----+   |   | FA,   |      |      |    PMIPv4   |      |
        | MN |-------| DHCP  |---------------------------|  HA  |
        +----+   |   | Relay/|      |      |     R3      |      |
                 |   | Server| ASN2 |      |             +------+
                 |   +-------+      |      |
                 |                  |      |
                 +------------------+
                    Split PMA

        Figure 5: WiMAX NWG Network Configuration for PMIPv4 Use

  As shown in the figure above, WiMAX NWG uses the split PMA model.
  The PMIPv4 client is collocated with the NAS in ASN1 (aka,
  Authenticator ASN).  The NWG architecture divides the network into
  two parts.  The Access part is termed the "Access Service Network"
  (ASN).  The Core part is termed the "Connectivity Service Network"
  (CSN).  The MN attaches to an 802.16 radio in the ASN2 (aka, Anchor
  Data Path Function).  The radio (base station) connects to the Anchor
  Data Path Function (A_DPF) in ASN2, which in turn connects to the
  Authenticator ASN (NAS) in ASN1.  ASN1 authenticates and authorizes
  the MN.  The AAA infrastructure is used to authenticate and authorize
  the MN.

  Note that, during initial network entry by the MN, the PMA can be an
  integrated PMA with all the functions collocated in ASN1.  Due to
  mobility, the FA part of the PMA may have to be relocated to a more



Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 29]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  optimized location for better bearer management.  However, to
  describe the WiMAX specific use case for Proxy Mobile IPv4, we will
  use the split PMA model since it is a more generic representation of
  the WiMAX NWG mobility framework.

  The WiMAX NWG specification [NWG] defines a key bootstrapping scheme
  for use with Proxy Mobile IPv4.  The specification uses per-MN
  security association for Proxy Mobile IPv4 operation.  The relevant
  keys (e.g., MN-HA key) are derived using EAP authentication as
  specified in this document.  For more information, please refer to
  Section 4.3 of [NWG], stage-3 specification.

  Mobile IPv4 Registration Revocation is optionally supported in WiMAX.
  The security association for this is per node.  It is provided with
  FA-HA AE.  The FA-HA key is also bootstrapped via the same key
  hierarchy that is described in Section 4.3 of [NWG].

  The Proxy Mobile IPv4 operation in WiMAX NWG is aligned with the
  basic Proxy Mobile IPv4 operation as described in Section 4 of this
  document.  There are specific considerations for WiMAX NWG 1.0.0 use
  of Proxy Mobile IPv4.  These are listed below:

  1.  Use of per-MS SA for Proxy Mobile IPv4 registration.  In this
      case, MN-HA AE is used.

  2.  Use of split PMA to handle FA relocation while the PMIPv4 client
      remains anchored with the NAS (Authenticator ASN).

  3.  Only the Proxy Mobile IPv4 Access Technology Type extension
      defined in this document is used in the NWG specification [NWG].

  4.  GRE key identifier is optionally used between the HA and the PMA.

  5.  The PMIPv4 client and the FA interact via the WiMAX specific
      reference point and protocol (aka, R4).  For more information,
      please refer to the NWG specification [NWG].

  6.  In order to handle inter-ASN (inter Access Router) handover and
      still allow the MN to use the same DHCP server's IP address that
      was sent in DHCPOFFER/ACK, the DHCP server (aka, proxy) functions
      in the ASN are required to be configured with the same IP
      address.

  7.  The MN - AR (trigger for Proxy Mobile IPv4) interaction is based
      on DHCP.  DHCPDISCOVER from the MN triggers the Proxy Mobile IPv4
      process in the ASN.





Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 30]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


10.1.  Proxy Mobile IPv4 Call Flow Examples with Split PMA in WiMAX

  Since WiMAX uses the split PMA model, the call flows involve WiMAX
  proprietary signaling between the PMIPv4 client and FA within the
  PMA.  The following call flows illustrate this.

                    Split PMA
                    +-----------------------------------+
           +----+   | +------+     +------+     +-----+ |    +-----+
           |    |   | | NAS/ |     |  Old |     | New | |    |     |
           | MN |   | | PMIP |     |  FA  |     |  FA | |    | HA  |
           |    |   | |Client|     |      |     |     | |    |     |
           +----+   | +------+     +------+     +-----+ |    +-----+
              |     +----|------------|------------|----+       |
              |          |            |       PMIP Tunnel       |
              |          |            |<=======================>|
              |          |            |            |            |
              |          |            |  R4 tunnel |            |
              |          |            |<==========>|            |
              |          |       1    |            |            |
              |<---------------------------------->|            |
              |          |            |            |            |
              |          |            |     2      |            |
              |          |            |<---------->|            |
              |          |       3    |            |            |
              |          |<----------------------- |            |
              |          |            |            |            |
              |          |       4    |            |            |
         +->  |          |------------------------>|            |
         |    |          |            |            |     5      |
         |    |          |            |            |----------->|
         |    |          |            |            |            |
  PMIP   |    |          |            |            |     6      |
         |    |          |            |            |<-----------|
         |    |          |            |            |            |
         |    |          |       7    |            |            |
         +->  |          |<------------------------|            |
              |          |            |            |            |
              |          |            |     8      |            |
              |          |            |<---------->|            |
              |          |            |            |            |
              |     9    |            |            |PMIP Tunnel |
  Data        |<---------------------------------->|<==========>|
  Forwarding  |          |            |            |            |

       Figure 6: Proxy Handover Operation in WiMAX with Split PMA





Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 31]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  In this scenario, the MN has moved to a new FA's area (known as the
  Data Path Function in WiMAX).  The old FA and the new FA interact
  with each other and also with the PMIPv4 client over a WiMAX-
  specified R4 reference point to perform the handover.  The steps are
  described below:

  1.  The mobile device establishes a L2 link with a base station (not
      shown), which connects to a new FA (aka, new Data Path Function
      in WiMAX).  Note that, in this case, the MN does not perform
      authentication and authorization.  The PMIPv4 tunnel remains
      between the old FA (aka, old Data Path Function in WiMAX).  The
      data flows through the PMIPv4 tunnel between the HA and the old
      FA, and through the WiMAX-specific R4 tunnel between the old FA
      and the new FA and from the new FA to the MN.

  2.  The new FA interacts with the old FA using a WiMAX-specific R4
      reference point to initiate the handover process.

  3.  The new FA uses the WiMAX-specific R4 reference point to request
      the PMIPv4 client to begin the PMIPv4 handover.

  4.  Triggered by step 3, the PMIPv4 client sends a PRRQ to the new
      FA.  The PRRQ contains the FA-CoA of the new FA.  The Home
      Address field is set to the address of the assigned IP address of
      the Mobile Node.  The PRRQ is embedded in the WiMAX-specific R4
      packet.

  5.  The new FA forwards the PRRQ to the HA.

  6.  The Home Agent updates the existing mobility binding entry for
      the mobile device upon processing the PRRQ.  The Home Agent
      responds back to the new FA with PRRP.

  7.  The new FA forwards the PRRP after encapsulating it in a WiMAX-
      specific R4 packet to the PMIPv4 client.

  8.  The new FA and the old FA exchange WiMAX-specific R4 messages
      between them to confirm the handover.  The old FA cleans up its
      resources for the MN.  The R4 bearer forwarding also stops at
      this point.

  9.  The forward and reverse direction traffic flows via the new FA.
      The handover is complete at this point.








Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 32]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


11.  Proxy Mobile IPv4 Use Case in 3GPP2

  3GPP2 uses the Proxy Mobile IPv4 scheme to provide mobility service
  for the following scenarios (as shown in the figures below):

  1.  Mobility between the base station (BS) and access gateway (AGW)

  2.  Mobility between the AGW and the Home Agent (HA).

  As shown in the diagrams below, in use case 1, the BS acts as the PMA
  and the AGW acts as the HA for Proxy Mobile IPv4 operation.  In use
  case 2, the AGW acts as the PMA while the HA assumes the role of the
  Home Agent.

                    RAN                            Core

                 +-------+                       +------+
     +----+      | BS/   |             PMIPv4    |      |
     | MN |------| PMA   |-----------------------| AGW/ |
     +----+      |       |                       |  HA  |
                 |       |                       +------+
                 +-------+

               Integrated PMA

     Figure 7: 3GPP2's PMIPv4 Use Case 1 - BS-AGW Interface Mobility

                    RAN                            Core

                 +-------+                       +------+
     +----+      | AGW/  |             PMIPv4    |      |
     | MN |------| PMA   |-----------------------|  HA  |
     +----+      |       |                       |      |
                 |       |                       +------+
                 +-------+

               Integrated PMA

     Figure 8: 3GPP2's PMIPv4 Use Case 2 - AGW-HA Interface Mobility

  The figure below shows a simplified 3GPP2 architecture.  For details,
  please refer to the 3GPP2 Converged Access Network (CAN) architecture
  ([3GPP2]).








Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 33]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


                          RAN                    Core
                -----------^------------   -------^-------------
               |                        | |                     |
               V                        V V                     V

                 +------+            +------+           +-----+
     +----+      |      |  PMIPv4    |      |  PMIPv4   |     |
     | MN |------| BS   |------------| AGW  |-----------| HA  |
     +----+      |      |            |      |           |     |
                 +------+            +------+           +-----+

                 Figure 9: Simplified 3GPP2 Architecture

  The Proxy Mobile IPv4 usage scenario in 3GPP2 (case 1) is illustrated
  in the following diagram:

        +----+        +-------+      +-------+   +------+
        |    |        |       |      |       |   |      |
        | MN |        |  BS/  |      | HAAA  |   | AGW/ |
        |    |        |  PMA  |      |       |   | HA   |
        +----+        +-------+      +-------+   +------+
          |               |             |          |
          |     1a        |     1b      |          |
          |<------------->|<----------->|          |
          |               |             |          |
          |     2         |             |          |
          |-------------->|             |          |
          |               |       3     |          |
          |               |----------------------->|
          |               |             |          |
          |               |       4     |          |
          |               |<-----------------------|
          |     5         |             |          |
          |<--------------|             |          |
          |               |             |          |
          |     6         |             |          |
          |<======================================>|
          |               |             |          |

            Figure 10: Network Connection Setup (use case 1)

  Description of the steps:

  1a.  MN performs layer 2 establishment with the BS/PMA and performs
       access authentication/authorization.  During this phase, the MN
       runs EAP over Ultra Mobile Broadband (UMB).  The BS acts as the
       NAS in this phase.




Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 34]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  1b.  The BS exchanges AAA messages with the Home AAA server via the
       AR (not shown in the figure) to authenticate the MN.  As part of
       this step, the AR may download some information about the MN
       (e.g., user's profile, handset type, assigned Home Agent
       address, and other capabilities of the MN).  This information is
       passed to the PMA/BS (as necessary) to set up the PMIPv4 tunnel
       in the next step(s).

  2.   The MN sends layer 2 signaling messages to the BS/PMA to trigger
       the PMIPv4 tunnel setup process.

  3.   Triggered by step 2, the PMA/BS sends a PRRQ to the AGW/HA.  The
       HA's address is either received at step 1b from the Home AAA
       server (HAAA) or is discovered by other means.  The PRRQ
       contains the Care-of Address (CoA) of the PMA (collocated FA in
       this case).  The HoA field is set to all zeros (or all ones).
       The PRRQ is protected by the method described in this document.
       The derivation and distribution of the MN-HA or FA-HA key is
       outside the scope of this document.

  4.   The AGW/HA registers the MN's session, assigns a symmetric GRE
       key, and returns this key in the PRRP to the BS/PMA.

  5.   The BS/PMA responds back to the MN with a layer 2 signaling
       message.

  6.   At this step, the MN is assigned an IP address and is connected
       to the network (via the AGW).

  In use case 2, the same procedures are followed except the PMIPv4
  tunnel is established between the AGW and the HA.  In this case, GRE
  tunneling may not be used.



















Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 35]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


11.1.  Handover Considerations in 3GPP2

  There are some special handover considerations in 3GPP2's Proxy
  Mobile IPv4 use case.  Below is an illustration of the specific use
  case:

     +----+        +-------+      +-------+   +-------+
     |    |        |       |      |       |   |       |
     | MN |        | New   |      |  AGW/ |   | Old   |
     |    |        | PMA/BS|      |  HA   |   | PMA/BS|
     +----+        +-------+      +-------+   +-------+
       |               |              |          |
       |               |      1       |          |
       |               |------------->|          |
       |               |              |          |
       |               |              |          |
       |               |              o 2        |
       |               |              |          |
       |               |              |          |
       |               |      3       |          |
       |               |<-------------|          |
       |               |              |          |
       |               |              |          |
       |               |         4    |          |
       |               |<----------------------->|
       |               |              |          |
       |               |              |          |
       |               |              |          o  5
       |               |              |          |
       |               |              |          |

        Figure 11: 3GPP2 Registration Revocation for Previous PMA

  Description of the steps:

  1.  MN attaches to the new BS (L2 gets established).  There is an
      ongoing mobility binding entry (MBE) in the AGW for the MN.  The
      PMA in the new BS sends a PRRQ to the AGW.

  2.  The AGW receives a Proxy Registration Request for a Mobile Node
      and detects that it has an existing Mobility Binding Entry (MBE).
      The AGW validates the PRRQ from the new BS and updates the MBE
      for the MN.  The MBE is kept tentative at this point.

  3.  The AGW sends a Proxy Registration Reply to the new BS.  No
      Registration Revocation is used in the 3GPP2's use case.





Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 36]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  4.  A 3GPP2's proprietary PMA movement notification message may be
      exchanged between the AGW and the old BS.

  5.  The MBE update with the new BS is committed at this step.

12.  IANA Considerations

  This specification registers 47 for the Proxy Mobile IPv4
  Non-Skippable Extension and 147 for Proxy Mobile IPv4 Skippable
  Extension, both of which are described in Section 5.  The ranges for
  Mobile IPv4 [RFC3344] extension types are defined at
  http://www.iana.org.  This specification also creates a new subtype
  space for the type number of the extensions.  The subtype value 1 is
  defined for the PMIPv4 Non-Skippable Extension.  The subtype values 1
  to 4 are defined for the PMIPv4 Skippable Extension.  Similar to the
  procedures specified for Mobile IPv4 number spaces, future
  allocations from the number space require expert review [RFC5226].

  The PMIPv4 Per-Node Authentication Method extension defined in
  Section 5.1 of this document, introduces a new authentication method
  numbering space, where the values from 0 to 2 have been assigned per
  this document.  Approval of new Access Technology type values are to
  be made through IANA Expert Review.

  The PMIPv4 Device ID extension defined in Section 5.3 of this
  document, introduces a new ID type numbering space, where the values
  from 0 to 4 have been assigned per this document.  Approval of new
  Access Technology type values are to be made through IANA Expert
  Review.

  The PMIPv4 Subscriber ID extension defined in Section 5.4 of this
  document, introduces a new ID type numbering space, where the values
  from 0 to 1 have been reserved by this document.  Approval of new
  Access Technology type values are to be made through IANA Expert
  Review.

  The PMIPv4 Access Technology Type extension defined in Section 5.5 of
  this document, introduces a new technology type numbering space,
  where the values from 0 to 8 have been reserved by this document.
  Approval of new Access Technology type values are to be made through
  IANA Expert Review.










Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 37]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


12.1.  Mobile IPv4 Extension Types

  This document introduces the following Mobile IP extension types.

  Name       : Proxy Mobile IPv4 Non-Skippable Extension
  Type Value : 47
  Section    : 5

  Name       : Proxy Mobile IPv4 Skippable Extension
  Type Value : 147
  Section    : 5

12.2.  Mobile IPv4 Error Codes

  This document introduces the following error code that can be
  returned by the HA in a Proxy Registration Reply.

  Name                    Value    First referenced
  ----                    -----    ----------------
  PMIP_UNSUPPORTED         149     Section 8.1 of RFC 5563
  PMIP_DISALLOWED          150     Section 8.1 of RFC 5563

13.  Security Considerations

  The functionality in this document is protected by the authentication
  extensions described in RFC 3344 [RFC3344] or IPsec [RFC4301].  Each
  PMA needs to have an security association (e.g., MN-HA, FA-HA, IPsec
  AH/ESP) with the HA to register the MN's IP address.  The security
  association can be provisioned by the administrator or dynamically
  derived.  The dynamic key derivation and distribution for this scheme
  is outside the scope of this document.

14.  Acknowledgements

  The authors would like to thank the following individuals for their
  review, comments, and suggestions to improve the content of this
  document.

  Shahab Sayeedi (Motorola), Alper Yegin (Samsung), Premec Domagoj
  (Siemens), Michael Hammer (Cisco), Jun Wang (Qualcomm), Jayshree
  Bharatia (Nortel), Semyon Mizikovsky (Alcatel-Lucent), Federico De
  Juan Huarte (Alcatel-Lucent), Paula Tjandra (Motorola), Alice Qinxia
  (Huawei), Howie Koh (Greenpacket), John Zhao (Huawei), Pete McCann
  (Motorola), and Sri Gundavelli (Cisco).







Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 38]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


15.  References

15.1.  Normative References

  [3GPP2]      "3GPP2 Basic IP Service for Converged Access Network",
               X.S0054-100-0 Version 2.0, August 2008.

  [NWG]        "WiMAX Forum Network Architecture (Stage 3: Detailed
               Protocols and Procedures)" Release 1, Version 1.2.3,
               July 2008.

  [RFC2119]    Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
               Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

  [RFC2131]    Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol", RFC
               2131, March 1997.

  [RFC3024]    Montenegro, G., Ed., "Reverse Tunneling for Mobile IP,
               revised", RFC 3024, January 2001.

  [RFC3344]    Perkins, C., Ed., "IP Mobility Support for IPv4", RFC
               3344, August 2002.

  [RFC3543]    Glass, S. and M. Chandra, "Registration Revocation in
               Mobile IPv4", RFC 3543, August 2003.

15.2.  Informative References

  [MIP4GREKEY] Yegani, P., "GRE Key Extension for Mobile IPv4", Work in
               Progress, June 2007.

  [MIP4MCBC]   Chakrabarti, S., "IPv4 Mobility extension for Multicast
               and Broadcast Packets", Work in Progress, November 2007.

  [RFC0791]    Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791,
               September 1981.

  [RFC1305]    Mills, D., "Network Time Protocol (Version 3)
               Specification, Implementation and Analysis", RFC 1305,
               March 1992.

  [RFC1332]    McGregor, G., "The PPP Internet Protocol Control
               Protocol (IPCP)", RFC 1332, May 1992.

  [RFC1661]    Simpson, W., Ed., "The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)",
               STD 51, RFC 1661, July 1994.





Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 39]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


  [RFC1994]    Simpson, W., "PPP Challenge Handshake Authentication
               Protocol (CHAP)", RFC 1994, August 1996.

  [RFC3748]    Aboba, B., Blunk, L., Vollbrecht, J., Carlson, J., and
               H. Levkowetz, Ed., "Extensible Authentication Protocol
               (EAP)", RFC 3748, June 2004.

  [RFC4058]    Yegin, A., Ed., Ohba, Y., Penno, R., Tsirtsis, G., and
               C. Wang, "Protocol for Carrying Authentication for
               Network Access (PANA) Requirements", RFC 4058, May 2005.

  [RFC4301]    Kent, S. and K. Seo, "Security Architecture for the
               Internet Protocol", RFC 4301, December 2005.

  [RFC4303]    Kent, S., "IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)", RFC
               4303, December 2005.

  [RFC4332]    Leung, K., Patel, A., Tsirtsis, G., and E. Klovning,
               "Cisco's Mobile IPv4 Host Configuration Extensions", RFC
               4332, December 2005.

  [RFC4433]    Kulkarni, M., Patel, A., and K. Leung, "Mobile IPv4
               Dynamic Home Agent (HA) Assignment", RFC 4433, March
               2006.

  [RFC4436]    Aboba, B., Carlson, J., and S. Cheshire, "Detecting
               Network Attachment in IPv4 (DNAv4)", RFC 4436, March
               2006.

  [RFC5213]    Gundavelli, S., Ed., Leung, K., Devarapalli, V.,
               Chowdhury, K., and B. Patil, "Proxy Mobile IPv6", RFC
               5213, August 2008.

  [RFC5226]    Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
               IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
               May 2008.

  [RFC5454]    Tsirtsis, G., Park, V., and H. Soliman, "Dual-Stack
               Mobile IPv4", RFC 5454, March 2009.

  [RFCARP]     Plummer, D., "Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol: Or
               Converting Network Protocol Addresses to 48.bit Ethernet
               Address for Transmission on Ethernet Hardware", STD 37,
               RFC 826, November 1982.

  [RFCICMP]    Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol", STD 5,
               RFC 792, September 1981.




Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 40]

RFC 5563               WiMAX Forum / 3GPP2 PMIPv4          February 2010


Authors' Addresses

  Kent Leung
  Cisco Systems
  170 West Tasman Drive
  San Jose, CA  95134
  US

  EMail: [email protected]


  Gopal Dommety
  Cisco Systems
  170 West Tasman Drive
  San Jose, CA  95134
  US

  EMail: [email protected]


  Parviz Yegani
  Juniper Networks
  1194 North Mathilda Ave.
  Sunnyvale, CA 94089-1206

  EMail: [email protected]


  Kuntal Chowdhury
  Starent Networks
  30 International Place
  Tewksbury, MA  01876
  USA

  EMail: [email protected]
















Leung, et al.                 Informational                    [Page 41]