Network Working Group                                            B. Volz
Request for Comments: 4649                           Cisco Systems, Inc.
Category: Standards Track                                    August 2006


        Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)
                     Relay Agent Remote-ID Option


Status of This Memo

  This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
  Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
  improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
  Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
  and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

Abstract

  This memo defines a new Relay Agent Remote-ID option for the Dynamic
  Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6).  This option is the
  DHCPv6 equivalent for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for
  IPv4 (DHCPv4) Relay Agent Option's Remote-ID suboption as specified
  in RFC 3046.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction ....................................................2
  2. Requirements Terminology ........................................2
  3. The Relay Agent Remote-ID Option ................................2
  4. DHCPv6 Relay Agent Behavior .....................................3
  5. DHCPv6 Server Behavior ..........................................3
  6. Security Considerations .........................................3
  7. IANA Considerations .............................................4
  8. Acknowledgements ................................................4
  9. References ......................................................4
     9.1. Normative References .......................................4
     9.2. Informative References .....................................4









Volz                        Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 4649                 Relay Agent Remote-ID               August 2006


1.  Introduction

  DHCPv6 [1] provides IP addresses and configuration information for
  IPv6 clients.  It includes a relay agent capability, in which
  processes within the network infrastructure receive multicast
  messages from clients and relay them to DHCPv6 servers.  In some
  network environments, it will be useful for the relay agent to add
  information to the DHCPv6 message before relaying it.

  The information that relay agents supply can also be used in the
  server's decision making about the addresses, delegated prefixes [4],
  and configuration parameters that the client is to receive.

  The memo specifies the DHCPv6 equivalent of the DHCPv4 Relay Agent
  option's Remote-ID suboption as specified in [2].  The motivation and
  usage scenarios are provided in [2].

2.  Requirements Terminology

  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
  "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
  document are to be interpreted as described in [3].

3.  The Relay Agent Remote-ID Option

  This option may be added by DHCPv6 relay agents that terminate
  switched or permanent circuits and have mechanisms to identify the
  remote host end of the circuit.

  The format of the DHCPv6 Relay Agent Remote-ID option is shown below:

       0                   1                   2                   3
       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |       OPTION_REMOTE_ID        |         option-len            |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |                       enterprise-number                       |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      .                                                               .
      .                           remote-id                           .
      .                                                               .
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      option-code        OPTION_REMOTE_ID (37)

      option-len         4 + the length, in octets, of the remote-id
                         field.  The minimum option-len is 5 octets.




Volz                        Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 4649                 Relay Agent Remote-ID               August 2006


      enterprise-number  The vendor's registered Enterprise Number as
                         registered with IANA [5].

      remote-id          The opaque value for the remote-id.

  The definition of the remote-id carried in this option is vendor
  specific.  The vendor is indicated in the enterprise-number field.
  The remote-id field may be used to encode, for instance:

  o  a "caller ID" telephone number for dial-up connection
  o  a "user name" prompted for by a Remote Access Server
  o  a remote caller ATM address
  o  a "modem ID" of a cable data modem
  o  the remote IP address of a point-to-point link
  o  a remote X.25 address for X.25 connections
  o  an interface or port identifier

  Each vendor must ensure that the remote-id is unique for its
  enterprise-number, as the octet sequence of enterprise-number
  followed by remote-id must be globally unique.  One way to achieve
  uniqueness might be to include the relay agent's DHCP Unique
  Identifier (DUID) [1] in the remote-id.

4.  DHCPv6 Relay Agent Behavior

  DHCPv6 relay agents may be configured to include a Remote-ID option
  in relayed (RELAY-FORW) DHCPv6 messages.

5.  DHCPv6 Server Behavior

  This option provides additional information to the DHCPv6 server.
  The DHCPv6 server, if it is configured to support this option, may
  use this information to select parameters specific to particular
  users, hosts, or subscriber modems.  The combined enterprise-number
  and remote-id SHOULD be considered an opaque value, with policies
  based on exact string match only; that is, the remote-id field SHOULD
  NOT be internally parsed by the server.

  There is no requirement that a server return this option and its data
  in a RELAY-REPLY message.

6.  Security Considerations

  See [1] section 21.1, on securing DHCPv6 messages sent between
  servers and relay agents, and section 23, on general DHCPv6 security
  considerations.  [2] discusses how this information can be used to
  enhance trust in some environments.




Volz                        Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 4649                 Relay Agent Remote-ID               August 2006


  Note that even if the DHCP server trusts the relay agent not to
  modify information provided in this option, the confidence in that
  information is no higher than the confidence that the relay agent has
  in the information it puts in the option.  For example, in some
  protocols it may be possible for a DHCP client to spoof or otherwise
  choose port identifiers, caller ID information, or other information
  carried in this option.  Sites should consider such possible spoofing
  and how likely it is in their environment when deciding what uses of
  this option are appropriate.

7.  IANA Considerations

  IANA has assigned the DHCPv6 option code 37 for the Relay Agent
  Remote-ID Option.

8.  Acknowledgements

  Thanks to Michael Patrick for [2], from which I've liberally borrowed
  text.

9.  References

9.1.  Normative References

  [1]  Droms, R., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M.
       Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)",
       RFC 3315, July 2003.

  [2]  Patrick, M., "DHCP Relay Agent Information Option", RFC 3046,
       January 2001.

  [3]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
       Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

9.2.  Informative References

  [4]  Troan, O. and R. Droms, "IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host
       Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6", RFC 3633, December
       2003.

  [5]  IANA, "Private Enterprise Numbers",
       <http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers>.









Volz                        Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 4649                 Relay Agent Remote-ID               August 2006


Author's Address

  Bernard Volz
  Cisco Systems, Inc.
  1414 Massachusetts Ave.
  Boxborough, MA  01719
  USA

  Phone: +1 978 936 0382
  EMail: [email protected]









































Volz                        Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 4649                 Relay Agent Remote-ID               August 2006


Full Copyright Statement

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

  This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
  contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
  retain all their rights.

  This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
  "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
  OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
  ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
  INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
  INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
  WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

  The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
  Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
  pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
  this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
  might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
  made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
  on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
  found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

  Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
  assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
  attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
  such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
  specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
  http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

  The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
  copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
  rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
  this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
  [email protected].

Acknowledgement

  Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
  Administrative Support Activity (IASA).







Volz                        Standards Track                     [Page 6]