Network Working Group                                     H. Schulzrinne
Request for Comments: 4482                                   Columbia U.
Category: Standards Track                                      July 2006


 CIPID: Contact Information for the Presence Information Data Format

Status of This Memo

  This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
  Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
  improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
  Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
  and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

Abstract

  The Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) defines a basic XML
  format for presenting presence information for a presentity.  The
  Contact Information for the Presence Information Data format (CIPID)
  is an extension that adds elements to PIDF that provide additional
  contact information about a presentity and its contacts, including
  references to address book entries and icons.
























Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006


Table of Contents

  1. Introduction ....................................................2
  2. Terminology and Conventions .....................................3
  3. CIPID Elements ..................................................3
     3.1. Card Element ...............................................3
     3.2. Display-Name Element .......................................3
     3.3. Homepage Element ...........................................3
     3.4. Icon Element ...............................................4
     3.5. Map Element ................................................4
     3.6. Sound Element ..............................................4
  4. Example .........................................................4
  5. The XML Schema Definition .......................................6
  6. IANA Considerations .............................................7
     6.1. URN Sub-Namespace Registration for .........................7
          'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid'
     6.2. Schema Registration for Schema
          'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid' ........................7
  7. Internationalization Considerations .............................8
  8. Security Considerations .........................................8
  9. References ......................................................9
     9.1. Normative References .......................................9
     9.2. Informative References ....................................10

1.  Introduction

  Presence information facilitates communication; its usefulness can be
  enhanced by providing basic information about a presentity or
  contact.  This specification describes a basic set of information
  elements that allow a watcher to retrieve additional information
  about a presentity or contact.

  This specification defines extensions to the PIDF [9] Extensible
  Markup Language [7][8][10] (XML) document format.

  We describe elements for providing a "business card", references to
  the homepage, map, representative sound, display name, and an icon.
  This additional presence information can be used in PIDF [9]
  documents, together with Rich Presence Information Data format [11]
  (RPID), future-status [12], and other PIDF extensions.

  All elements extend the <person> or, less commonly, <tuple> element
  in the presence data model [13].  The <tuple> element is only
  extended with Contact Information for the Presence Information Data
  format (CIPID) elements if the information describes a service
  referring to another person that is marked by an RPID <relationship>
  element with a value other than 'self'.  All elements described in
  this document are optional.



Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006


  RPID and CIPID both provide "rich" presence that goes beyond the
  basic 'open' and 'closed' status information in PIDF.  The presence
  information described in these two documents can be supplied
  independently, although in practice, both will often appear in the
  same PIDF document.  CIPID elements describe the more static aspects
  of somebody's presence information, while RPID focuses on elements
  that will likely change throughout the day.  Thus, CIPID information
  can often be statically configured by the user through the graphical
  user interface of a presence client; this is less likely to be
  sufficient for RPID.

  The namespace URI for these elements defined by this specification is
  a URN [2], using the namespace identifier 'ietf' defined by [4] and
  extended by [6]:

     urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid

2.  Terminology and Conventions

  The key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT,
  RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL in this document are to be interpreted
  as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119 [1].

3.  CIPID Elements

  Unless otherwise noted below, each element may only appear at most
  once.

3.1.  Card Element

  The <card> element includes a URI pointing to a business card, e.g.,
  in LDAP Data Interchange Format [15] (LDIF) or vCard [14] format.

3.2.  Display-Name Element

  The <display-name> element includes the name identifying the tuple or
  person that the presentity suggests should be shown by the watcher
  user interface.  It is left to the watcher user interface design to
  choose whether to heed this suggestion or to use some other suitable
  string.  The CIPID information MAY contain multiple display names,
  but only if they are labeled with different 'xml:lang' attributes.
  This allows a Korean-speaking presentity to convey its display name
  in different languages, Latin and Hangul, for example.

3.3.  Homepage Element

  The <homepage> element provides a URI pointing to general information
  about the tuple or person, typically a web home page.



Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006


3.4.  Icon Element

  The <icon> element provides a URI pointing to an image (icon)
  representing the tuple or person.  The watcher can use this
  information to represent the tuple or person in a graphical user
  interface.  Presentities SHOULD provide images of sizes and aspect
  ratios that are appropriate for rendering as an icon.  Support for
  JPEG, PNG, and GIF formats is REQUIRED.

3.5.  Map Element

  The <map> element provides a URI pointing to a map related to the
  tuple or person.  The watcher can use this information to represent
  the tuple or person in a graphical user interface.  The map may be
  either an image, an HTML client-side image map, or a geographical
  information system (GIS) document, e.g., encoded as GML.  Support for
  images formatted as PNG and GIF is REQUIRED.

3.6.  Sound Element

  The <sound> element provides a URI pointing to a sound related to the
  tuple or person.  The watcher MAY use the sound object, such as a
  MIDI or MP3 file, referenced by the URL to inform the watcher that
  the presentity has assumed the status OPEN.  Implementors are advised
  to create user interfaces that provide the watcher with the
  opportunity to choose whether to play such sounds.  Support for
  sounds coded as MPEG-2 Layer 3 (MP3) is RECOMMENDED.  The sound
  object might also be used to indicate how to pronounce the
  presentity's name.

4.  Example

  An example using CIPID only is shown below:

  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
  <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
       xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model"
       xmlns:c="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid"
       entity="pres:[email protected]">

    <tuple id="bs35r9">
      <status>
        <basic>open</basic>
      </status>
      <contact priority="0.8">im:[email protected]</contact>
      <timestamp>2005-11-21T16:14:29Z</timestamp>
    </tuple>




Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006


    <dm:person id="p1">
      <c:card>http://example.com/~alice/card.vcd</c:card>
      <c:display-name>Alice Lewis</c:card>
      <c:homepage>http://example.com/~alice</c:homepage>
      <c:icon>http://example.com/~alice/me.png</c:icon>
      <c:map>http://example.com/~alice/gml-map.xml</c:map>
      <c:sound>http://example.com/~alice/hello.wav</c:sound>
      <dm:timestamp>2005-11-21T09:00:00+05:00</dm:timestamp>
    </dm:person>
  </presence>

  An example combining RPID and CIPID is shown below:

  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
  <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
  xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
  xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model"
  xmlns:c="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid"
  xmlns:r="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid"
  xsi:schemaLocation="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf pidf.xsd
  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model data-model.xsd
  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid cipid.xsd
  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid rpid.xsd"
  entity="pres:[email protected]">

    <tuple id="bs35r9">
      <status>
        <basic>open</basic>
      </status>
      <contact priority="0.8">im:[email protected]</contact>
      <timestamp>2005-05-30T22:00:29Z</timestamp>
    </tuple>

    <tuple id="bs78">
      <status>
         <basic>closed</basic>
      </status>
      <r:relationship><r:assistant/></r:relationship>
      <c:card>http://example.com/~assistant/card.vcd</c:card>
      <c:homepage>http://example.com/~assistant</c:homepage>
      <contact priority="0.1">im:[email protected]</contact>
      <timestamp>2005-05-30T22:00:29Z</timestamp>
    </tuple>

    <dm:person id="p1">
      <c:card>http://example.com/~someone/card.vcd</c:card>
      <c:homepage>http://example.com/~someone</c:homepage>
      <c:icon>http://example.com/~someone/icon.gif</c:icon>



Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006


      <c:map>http://example.com/~someone/gml-map.xml</c:map>
      <c:sound>http://example.com/~someone/whoosh.wav</c:sound>
      <dm:timestamp>2005-05-30T22:02:44+05:00</dm:timestamp>
    </dm:person>
  </presence>

5.  The XML Schema Definition

  The schema is shown below.

  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
  <xs:schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid"
      xmlns:cipid="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid"
      xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
      elementFormDefault="qualified"
      attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

    <xs:annotation>
      <xs:documentation>
        Describes CIPID tuple extensions for PIDF.
      </xs:documentation>
    </xs:annotation>

    <xs:element name="card" type="xs:anyURI"/>
    <xs:element name="display-name" type="xs:string"/>
    <xs:element name="homepage" type="xs:anyURI"/>
    <xs:element name="icon" type="xs:anyURI"/>
    <xs:element name="map" type="xs:anyURI"/>
    <xs:element name="sound" type="xs:anyURI"/>
  </xs:schema>

                         Figure 1: CIPID schema



















Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 6]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006


6.  IANA Considerations

  This document calls for IANA to register a new XML namespace URN and
  schema per [6].

6.1.  URN Sub-Namespace Registration for
     'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid'

  URI:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid
  Description:  This is the XML namespace for XML elements defined by
     RFC 4482 to describe contact information presence information
     extensions for the status element in the PIDF presence document
     format in the application/pidf+xml content type.
  Registrant Contact:  IETF, SIMPLE working group, [email protected];
     Henning Schulzrinne, [email protected]
  XML:

   BEGIN
   <?xml version="1.0"?>
   <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.0//EN"
   "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic10.dtd">
   <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
   <head>
      <meta http-equiv="content-type"
      content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1"/>
      <title>CIPID: Contact Information for the Presence Information
        Data Format</title>
   </head>
   <body>
     <h1>Namespace for contact information presence extension
         (status)</h1>
     <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid</h2>
     <p>See <a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4482.txt">
         RFC4482</a>.</p>
   </body>
   </html>
   END

6.2.  Schema Registration for Schema 'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid'

  URI:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid
  Registrant Contact:  IESG
  XML:  See Figure 1








Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 7]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006


7.  Internationalization Considerations

  CIPID delivers only URLs, except for the <display-name> element.  The
  resolution of the URLs can negotiate appropriate language and
  character sets within the URL-designated protocol.

  For the display name and to handle Internationalized Resource
  Identifiers (IRIs) [16], since CIPID is represented in XML, it
  provides native support for encoding information using the Unicode
  character set and its more compact representations including UTF-8.
  Conformant XML processors recognize both UTF-8 and UTF-16.  Though
  XML includes provisions to identify and use other character encodings
  through use of an "encoding" attribute in an <?xml?> declaration, use
  of UTF-8 is RECOMMENDED in environments where parser encoding support
  incompatibility exists.

  The XML 'xml:lang' attribute can be used to identify the language and
  script for the <display-name> element.  The specification allows
  multiple occurrences of this element so that the presentity can
  convey display names in multiple scripts and languages.  If no 'xml:
  lang' attribute is provided, the default value is "i-default" [3].

8.  Security Considerations

  The security issues are similar to those for RPID [11].  Watchers
  need to restrict which content types of content pointed to by <icon>,
  <homepage>, <map>, <sound>, and <vcard> elements they render.

  Also, when a watcher accesses these URIs, the presentity may deduce
  that the watcher is currently using the presence application.  Thus,
  a presence application concerned about leaking this information may
  want to cache these objects for later use.  (A presentity could
  easily customize the URLs for each watcher, so that it can tell who
  is referencing the objects.)  This caching behavior may cause the
  information to become stale, out-of-sync with the current data until
  the cache is refreshed.  Fortunately, the elements in CIPID are
  expected to retain the same content for periods measured in days, so
  that privacy-conscious applications may well decide to perform
  caching over durations that reveal little current activity
  information.  Presentities need to keep in mind that clients may
  cache the content referenced by URIs for long periods as they use
  their presence system to construct presence documents using this
  extension.  If the referenced content needs to change frequently, the
  presentity could, for example, update the presence document with a
  new URI to encourage clients to notice.






Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 8]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006


  Icons and other URIs in this document could be used as a covert
  channel to convey messages to the watcher, outside the content
  monitoring that might be in place for instant messages or other
  communications channels.  Thus, entities that worry about such
  channels may want to prohibit the usage of URLs pointing to resources
  outside their domain, for example.

  Implementors must take care to adhere to the mechanisms for verifying
  the identity in the referenced server's certificate against the URI.
  For instance, if the URI scheme is https, the requirements of RFC
  2818 [5], section 3.1, must be met.  In particular, the domain
  represented in the URI must match the subjectAltName in the
  certificate presented by the referenced server.  If this identity
  check fails, the referenced content SHOULD NOT be retrieved and MUST
  NOT be used.

9.  References

9.1.  Normative References

  [1]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
       Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

  [2]  Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997.

  [3]  Alvestrand, H., "IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages",
       BCP 18, RFC 2277, January 1998.

  [4]  Moats, R., "A URN Namespace for IETF Documents", RFC 2648,
       August 1999.

  [5]  Rescorla, E., "HTTP Over TLS", RFC 2818, May 2000.

  [6]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, January
       2004.

  [7]  Maloney, M., Beech, D., Thompson, H., and N. Mendelsohn, "XML
       Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition", W3C REC REC-
       xmlschema-1-20041028, October 2004.

  [8]  Malhotra, A. and P. Biron, "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second
       Edition", W3C REC REC-xmlschema-2-20041028, October 2004.

  [9]  Sugano, H., Fujimoto, S., Klyne, G., Bateman, A., Carr, W., and
       J. Peterson, "Presence Information Data Format (PIDF)", RFC
       3863, August 2004.





Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                     [Page 9]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006


  [10] Yergeau, F., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C., Bray, T., and E.
       Maler, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third Edition)",
       W3C REC REC-xml-20040204, February 2004.

9.2.  Informative References

  [11] Schulzrinne, H., Gurbani, V., Kyzivat, P., and J. Rosenberg,
       "RPID: Rich Presence Extensions to the Presence Information Data
       Format (PIDF)", RFC 4480, July 2006.

  [12] Schulzrinne, H., "Timed Presence Extensions to the Presence
       Information Data Format (PIDF) to Indicate Status Information
       for Past and Future Time Intervals", RFC 4481, July 2006.

  [13] Rosenberg, J., "A Data Model for Presence", RFC 4479, July 2006.

  [14] Dawson, F. and T. Howes, "vCard MIME Directory Profile", RFC
       2426, September 1998.

  [15] Good, G., "The LDAP Data Interchange Format (LDIF) - Technical
       Specification", RFC 2849, June 2000.

  [16] Duerst, M. and M. Suignard, "Internationalized Resource
       Identifiers (IRIs)", RFC 3987, January 2005.

Acknowledgements

  This document is based on discussions within the IETF SIMPLE working
  group.  Spencer Dawkins, Vijay Gurbani, Avshalom Houri, Hisham
  Khartabil, Paul Kyzivat, Eva Leppanen, Mikko Lonnfors, Aki Niemi, Jon
  Peterson, Jonathan Rosenberg, and Robert Sparks provided helpful
  comments.

Author's Address

  Henning Schulzrinne
  Columbia University
  Department of Computer Science
  450 Computer Science Building
  New York, NY  10027
  US

  Phone: +1 212 939 7004
  EMail: [email protected]
  URI:   http://www.cs.columbia.edu






Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                    [Page 10]

RFC 4482                         CIPID                         July 2006


Full Copyright Statement

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

  This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
  contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
  retain all their rights.

  This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
  "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
  OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
  ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
  INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
  INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
  WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

  The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
  Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
  pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
  this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
  might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
  made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
  on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
  found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

  Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
  assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
  attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
  such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
  specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
  http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

  The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
  copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
  rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
  this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
  [email protected].

Acknowledgement

  Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
  Administrative Support Activity (IASA).







Schulzrinne                 Standards Track                    [Page 11]