Network Working Group                                         P. Hoffman
Request for Comments: 4157                                VPN Consortium
Category: Historic                                           August 2005


                       The prospero URI Scheme

Status of This Memo

  This memo defines a Historic Document for the Internet community.  It
  does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of
  this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

Abstract

  This document specifies the prospero Uniform Resource Identifier
  (URI) scheme that was originally specified in RFC 1738.  The purpose
  of this document is to allow RFC 1738 to be made obsolete while
  keeping the information about the scheme on standards track.

1.  Introduction

  URIs were previously defined in RFC 2396 [RFC2396], which was updated
  by RFC 3986 [RFC3986].  Those documents also specify how to define
  schemes for URIs.

  The first definitions for many URI schemes appeared in RFC 1738
  [RFC1738].  Because that document has been made obsolete, this
  document copies the prospero URI scheme from it to allow that
  material to remain on standards track.

2.  Scheme Definition

  The prospero URL scheme is used to designate resources that are
  accessed through the Prospero Directory Service.  The Prospero
  protocol is described in the original Prospero specification [PROSP].

  Historical note: The Prospero protocol was not widely implemented and
  almost no Prospero servers are in use today.

  A prospero URL takes the form:

  prospero://<host>:<port>/<hsoname>;<field>=<value>




Hoffman                         Historic                        [Page 1]

RFC 4157                The prospero URI Scheme              August 2005


  If :<port> is omitted, the port defaults to 1525.  No username or
  password is allowed.

  The <hsoname> is the host-specific object name in the Prospero
  protocol, suitably encoded.  This name is opaque and interpreted by
  the Prospero server.  The semicolon ";" is reserved and may not
  appear without quoting in the <hsoname>.

  Prospero URLs are interpreted by contacting a Prospero directory
  server on the specified host and port to determine appropriate access
  methods for a resource.  The access methods might themselves be
  represented as different URLs.  External Prospero links are
  represented as URLs of the underlying access method and are not
  represented as Prospero URLs.

  Note that a slash "/" may appear in the <hsoname> without quoting,
  and no significance may be assumed by the application.  Though
  slashes may indicate hierarchical structure on the server, such
  structure is not guaranteed.  Note that many <hsoname>s begin with a
  slash, in which case the host or port will be followed by a double
  slash: the slash from the URL syntax, followed by the initial slash
  from the <hsoname> (e.g., <URL:prospero://example.com//pros/name>
  designates a <hsoname> of "/pros/name").

  In addition, after the <hsoname>, optional fields and values
  associated with a Prospero link may be specified as part of the URL.
  When present, each field/value pair is separated from each other and
  from the rest of the URL by a ";" (semicolon).  The name of the field
  and its value are separated by a "=" (equal sign).  If present, these
  fields serve to identify the target of the URL.  For example, the
  OBJECT-VERSION field can be specified to identify a specific version
  of an object.

3.  Security Considerations

  Many security considerations for URI schemes are discussed in
  [RFC3986].  [PROSP] uses passwords in the clear for authentication,
  and offers no privacy, both of which are considered extremely unsafe
  in current practice.












Hoffman                         Historic                        [Page 2]

RFC 4157                The prospero URI Scheme              August 2005


4.  Informative References

  [RFC1738]  Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L., and M. McCahill, "Uniform
             Resource Locators (URL)", RFC 1738, December 1994.

  [RFC2396]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
             Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396,
             August 1998.

  [RFC3986]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
             Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC
             3986, January 2005.

  [PROSP]    Neuman, B. and S. Augart, "The Prospero Protocol",
             USC/Information Sciences Institute, June 1993.

Author's Address

  Paul Hoffman
  VPN Consortium
  127 Segre Place
  Santa Cruz, CA  95060
  US

  EMail: [email protected]


























Hoffman                         Historic                        [Page 3]

RFC 4157                The prospero URI Scheme              August 2005


Full Copyright Statement

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

  This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
  contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
  retain all their rights.

  This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
  "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
  OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
  ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
  INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
  INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
  WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

  The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
  Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
  pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
  this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
  might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
  made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
  on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
  found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

  Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
  assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
  attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
  such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
  specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
  http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

  The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
  copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
  rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
  this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
  [email protected].

Acknowledgement

  Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
  Internet Society.







Hoffman                         Historic                        [Page 4]