Network Working Group                                            J. Polk
Request for Comments: 3825                                 J. Schnizlein
Category: Standards Track                                     M. Linsner
                                                          Cisco Systems
                                                              July 2004


            Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Option for
         Coordinate-based Location Configuration Information

Status of this Memo

  This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
  Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
  improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
  Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
  and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).


Abstract

  This document specifies a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Option
  for the coordinate-based geographic location of the client.  The
  Location Configuration Information (LCI) includes latitude,
  longitude, and altitude, with resolution indicators for each.  The
  reference datum for these values is also included.





















Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004


Table of Contents

  1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
      1.1.  Conventions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
      1.2.  Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
      1.3.  Rationale  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
  2.  Location Configuration Information (LCI) Elements. . . . . . .  4
      2.1.  Elements of the Location Configuration Information . . .  5
  3.  Security Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
  4.  IANA Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
  5.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
  Appendix Calculations of Imprecision possible with the DHC LCI . . 10
      A.1.  LCI of "White House" (Example 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
      A.2.  LCI of "Sears Tower" (Example 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
  6.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
      6.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
      6.2.  Informational References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
  7.  Author Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
  8.  Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

1.  Introduction

  This document specifies a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol [1]
  Option for the coordinate-based geographic location of the client, to
  be provided by the server.

  The DHCP server is assumed to have determined the location from the
  Circuit-ID Relay Agent Information Option (RAIO) defined (as SubOpt
  1) in [2].  In order to translate the circuit (switch port
  identifier) into a location, the DHCP server is assumed to have
  access to a service that maps from circuit-ID to the location at
  which the circuit connected to that port terminates in the building,
  for example, the location of the wall jack.

  An important feature of this specification is that after the relevant
  DHC exchanges have taken place, the location information is stored on
  the end device rather than somewhere else, where retrieving it might
  be difficult in practice.

  Another important feature of this LCI is its inclusion of a
  resolution parameter for each of the dimensions of location.  Because
  this resolution parameter need not apply to all dimensions equally, a
  resolution value is included for each of the 3 location elements.

  Resolution does not define Geographic Privacy policy.






Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004


  The resulting location information using this resolution method is a
  small fixed length Configuration Information that can be easily
  carried in protocols, such as DHCP, which have limited packet size
  because this LCI is only 18 bytes long.

  Finally, the appendix of this document provides some arithmetic
  examples of the implication of different resolution values on the
  La/Lo/Alt.

1.1.  Conventions used in this document

  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
  "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
  document are to be interpreted as described in [3].

1.2.  Motivation

  As applications such as IP Telephony are replacing conventional
  telephony, users are expecting the same (or greater) level of
  services with the new technology.  One service offered by
  conventional telephony that is missing in any standardized fashion
  within IP Telephony is for a user to be automatically located by
  emergency responders, in a timely fashion, when the user summons help
  (by dialing 911 in North America, for example).  Unless strict
  administrative rules are followed, the mobility of a wired Ethernet
  device within a campus negates any opportunity for an emergency
  responder to locate the device with any degree of expediency.  Users
  do not want to give up the mobility IP Telephony offers.  Informing
  the host device of its geo-location at host configuration time will
  allow the device to utilize this geo-location information to inform
  others of its current geo-location, if the user and/or application so
  desires.

  The goal of this option is to enable a wired Ethernet host to obtain
  its location, which it could provide to an emergency responder, as
  one example.

  Wireless hosts can utilize this option to gain knowledge of the
  location of the radio access point used during host configuration,
  but would need some more exotic mechanisms, maybe GPS, or maybe a
  future DHCP option, which includes a list of geo-locations like that
  defined here, containing the locations of the radio access points
  that are close to the client.








Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004


1.3.  Rationale

  Within the LCI described here, Latitude and Longitude are represented
  in fixed-point 2s-complement binary degrees, for the economy of a
  smaller option size compared to a string encoding of digits in [7].
  The integer parts of these fields are 9 bits long to accommodate +/-
  180 degrees.  The fractional part is 25 bits long, better than the
  precision of 7 decimal digits.  The length of each field is 40 bits,
  34 of which is the sum of the integer (9) and fractional (25) bits,
  plus 6 bits of resolution.

  Altitude is determined by the Altitude Type (AT) indicated by the AT
  field, which is 4 bits long.  Two Altitude Types are defined here,
  meters (code=1) and floors (code=2), both of which are 2s-complement
  fixed-point with 22 bits of integer part and 8 bits of fractional
  part.  Additional Altitude Types MAY be assigned by IANA.  The
  "floors" Altitude Type is provided because altitude in meters may not
  be known within a building, and a floor indication may be more
  useful.

  GPS systems today can use WGS84 for horizontal and vertical datums;
  [6] defines WGS84 as a three-dimensional datum.  For other datum
  values that do not include a vertical component, both the horizontal
  and vertical datum of reference will be specified in the IANA record.

  Each of these 3 elements begins with an accuracy sub-field of 6 bits,
  indicating the number of bits of resolution.  This resolution sub-
  field accommodates the desire to easily adjust the precision of a
  reported location.  Contents beyond the claimed resolution MAY be
  randomized to obscure greater precision that might be available.

2.  DHC Location Configuration Information Elements

  DHCP is a binary Protocol; using protocols of LCI are likely to be
  text based.  Since most coordinate systems translate easily between
  binary-based and text-based location output (even emergency services
  within the US), translation/conversion is a non-issue with DHCP's
  binary format.

  This binary format provides a fortunate benefit in a mechanism for
  making a true/correct location coordinate imprecise.  It further
  provides the capability to have this binary representation be
  deterministically imprecise.








Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004


  The LCI format is as follows:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   Code 123    |      16       |   LaRes   |     Latitude      +
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                Latitude (cont'd)              |    LoRes  |   +
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                             Longitude                         |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   AT  |   AltRes  |                Altitude                   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |  Alt (cont'd) |     Datum     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

2.1.  Elements of the Location Configuration Information

  Code 123:  The code for this DHCP option.

  16:        The length of this option is 16 bytes.

  LaRes:     Latitude resolution.  6 bits indicating the number of
             valid bits in the fixed-point value of Latitude.

  This value is the number of high-order Latitude bits that should be
  considered valid.  Any bits entered to the right of this limit should
  not be considered valid and might be purposely false, or zeroed by
  the sender.

  The examples in the appendix illustrate that a smaller value in the
  resolution field increases the area within which the device is
  located.

  LaRes does not define Geographic Privacy policy.

             Values above decimal 34 are undefined and reserved.

  Latitude:  a 34 bit fixed point value consisting of 9 bits of integer
             and 25 bits of fraction.  Latitude SHOULD be normalized to
             within +/- 90 degrees.  Positive numbers are north of the
             equator and negative numbers are south of the equator.

  A value of 2 in the LaRes field indicates a precision of no greater
  than 1/6th that of the globe (in the first example of the appendix).
  A value of 34 in the LaRes field indicates a precision of about 3.11
  mm in Latitude at the equator.




Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004


  LoRes:     Longitude resolution.  6 bits indicating the number of
             valid bits in the fixed-point value of Longitude.

  This value is the number of high-order Longitude bits that should be
  considered valid.  Any bits entered to the right of this limit should
  not be considered valid and might be purposely false, or zeroed by
  the sender.

  LoRes does not define Geographic Privacy policy.

             Values above decimal 34 are undefined and reserved.

  Longitude: a 34 bit fixed point value consisting of 9 bits of integer
             and 25 bits of fraction.  Longitude SHOULD be normalized
             to within +/- 180 degrees.  Positive values are East of
             the prime meridian and negative (2s complement) numbers
             are West of the prime meridian.

  A value of 2 in the LoRes field indicates precision of no greater
  than 1/6th that of the globe (see first example of the appendix).  A
  value of 34 in the LoRes field indicates a precision of about 2.42 mm
  in longitude (at the equator).  Because lines of longitude converge
  at the poles, the distance is smaller (better precision) for
  locations away from the equator.

  Altitude:  A 30 bit value defined by the AT field

  AltRes:    Altitude resolution.  6 bits indicating the number of
             valid bits in the altitude.  Values above 30 (decimal) are
             undefined and reserved.

  AltRes does not define Geographic Privacy policy.

  AT:        Altitude Type for altitude.  Codes defined are:

  1: Meters - in 2s-complement fixed-point 22-bit integer part with 8-
             bit fraction

  If AT = 1, an AltRes value 0.0 would indicate unknown altitude.  The
  most precise Altitude would have an AltRes value of 30.  Many values
  of AltRes would obscure any variation due to vertical datum
  differences.

  2: Floors - in 2s-complement fixed-point 22-bit integer part with
             8-bit fraction






Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 6]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004


  AT = 2 for Floors enables representing altitude in a form more
  relevant in buildings which have different floor-to-floor dimensions.
  An altitude coded as AT = 2, AltRes = 30, and Altitude = 0.0 is
  meaningful even outside a building, and represents ground level at
  the given latitude and longitude.  Inside a building, 0.0 represents
  the floor level associated with ground level at the main entrance.
  This document defines a number; one must arrive at the number by
  counting floors from the floor defined to be 0.0.

  The values represented by this AT will be of local significance.
  Since buildings and floors can vary due to lack of common control,
  the values chosen to represent the characteristics of an individual
  building will be derived and agreed upon by the operator of the
  building and the intended users of the data.  Attempting to
  standardize this type of function is beyond the scope this document.

  Sub-floors can be represented by non-integer values.  Example: a
  mezzanine between floor 1 and floor 2 could be represented as a value
  = 1.1.  Example: (2) mezzanines between floor 4 and floor 5 could be
  represented as values = 4.1 and 4.2 respectively.

  Floors located below ground level could be represented by negative
  values.

  Larger values represent floors that are above (higher in altitude)
  floors with lower values.

  The AltRes field SHOULD be set to maximum precision when AT = 2
  (floors) when a floor value is included in the DHCP Reply, or the
  AT = 0 to denote the floor isn't known.

  Any additional LCI Altitude Types(s) to be defined for use via this
  DHC Option MUST be done through a Standards Track RFC.

  Datum: The Map Datum used for the coordinates given in this Option

  The datum must include both a horizontal and a vertical reference.
  Since the WGS 84 reference datum is three-dimensional, it includes
  both.  For any additional datum parameters, the datum codepoint must
  specify both horizontal datum and vertical datum references.

  The Datum byte has 256 possibilities, of which 3 have been registered
  with IANA by this document (all derived from specification in [5]):

     1: WGS 84  (Geographical 3D) - World Geodesic System 1984, CRS
                Code 4327, Prime Meridian Name: Greenwich





Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 7]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004


     2: NAD83 - North American Datum 1983, CRS Code 4269, Prime
                Meridian Name: Greenwich; The associated vertical datum
                is the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88)

                This datum pair is to be used when referencing
                locations on land, not near tidal water (which would
                use Datum = 3 below)

     3: NAD83 - North American Datum 1983, CRS Code 4269, Prime
                Meridian Name: Greenwich; The associated vertical datum
                is Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW)

                This datum pair is to be used when referencing
                locations on water/sea/ocean

  Any additional LCI datum(s) to be defined for use via this DHC Option
  MUST be done through a Standards Track RFC.

3.  Security Considerations

  Where critical decisions might be based on the value of this GeoConf
  option, DHCP authentication in [4] SHOULD be used to protect the
  integrity of the DHCP options.

  Since there is no privacy protection for DHCP messages, an
  eavesdropper who can monitor the link between the DHCP server and
  requesting client can discover this LCI.

  To minimize the unintended exposure of location information, the LCI
  option SHOULD be returned by DHCP servers only when the DHCP client
  has included this option in its 'parameter request list' (section 3.5
  [1]).

  When implementing a DHC server that will serve clients across an
  uncontrolled network, one should consider the potential security
  risks.

4.  IANA Considerations

  IANA has assigned a DHCP option code of 123 for the GeoConf option
  defined in this document.

  The GeoConf Option defines two fields for which IANA maintains a
  registry: The Altitude (AT) field (see Section 2) and the Datum field
  (see Section 2).  The datum indicator MUST include specification of
  both horizontal and vertical datum.  New values for the Altitude (AT)
  field are assigned through "Standards Action" [RFC 2434].  The
  initial values of the Altitude registry are as follows:



Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 8]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004


  AT = 1  meters of Altitude defined by the vertical datum specified.

  AT = 2  building Floors of Altitude.

  Datum = 1 denotes the vertical datum WGS 84 as defined by the EPSG as
          their CRS Code 4327; CRS Code 4327 also specifies WGS 84 as
          the vertical datum

  Datum = 2 denotes the vertical datum NAD83 as defined by the EPSG as
          their CRS Code 4269; North American Vertical Datum of 1988
          (NAVD88) is the associated vertical datum for NAD83

  Datum = 3 denotes the vertical datum NAD83 as defined by the EPSG as
          their CRS Code 4269; Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) is the
          associated vertical datum for NAD83

  Any additional LCI datum(s) to be defined for use via this DHC Option
  MUST be done through a Standards Track RFC.

5.  Acknowledgements

  The authors would like to thank Patrik Falstrom, Ralph Droms, Ted
  Hardie, Jon Peterson, and Nadine Abbott for their inputs and
  constructive comments regarding this document.  Additionally, the
  authors would like to thank Greg Troxel for the education on vertical
  datums, and to Carl Reed.

























Polk, et al.                Standards Track                     [Page 9]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004


Appendix: Calculations of Imprecision Possible with the DHC LCI

  The following examples for two different locations demonstrate how
  the Resolution values for Latitude, Longitude, and Altitude can be
  used.  In both examples the geo-location values were derived from
  maps using the WGS84 map datum, therefore in these examples, the
  datum field would have a value = 1 (00000001, or 0x01).

A.1.  Location Configuration Information of "White House" (Example 1)

  The address was NOT picked for any political reason and can easily be
  found on the Internet or mapping software, but was picked as an
  easily identifiable location on our planet.

  Postal Address:
     White House
     1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
     Washington, DC 20006

  Standing on the sidewalk, north side of White House, between
  driveways.

     Latitude 38.89868 degrees North (or +38.89868 degrees)
     Using 2s complement, 34 bit fixed point, 25 bit fraction
     Latitude = 0x04dcc1fc8,
     Latitude = 0001001101110011000001111111001000

  Longitude 77.03723 degrees West (or -77.03723 degrees)
     Using 2s complement, 34 bit fixed point, 25 bit fraction
     Longitude = 0xf65ecf031,
     Longitude = 1101100101111011001111000000110001

  Altitude 15

  In this example, we are not inside a structure, therefore we will
  assume an altitude value of 15 meters, interpolated from the US
  Geological survey map, Washington West quadrangle.

     AltRes = 30, 0x1e, 011110
     AT = 1, 0x01, 000001
     Altitude = 15, 0x0F00, 00000000000000000000000001111100000000

  If: LaRes is expressed as value 2 (0x02 or 000010) and LoRes is
      expressed as value 2 (0x02 or 000010), then it would describe a
      geo-location region that is north of the equator and extends from
      -1 degree (west of the meridian) to -128 degrees.  This would
      include the area from approximately 600km south of Saltpond,
      Ghana, due north to the North Pole and approximately 4400km



Polk, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 10]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004


      south-southwest of Los Angeles, CA due north to the North Pole.
      This would cover an area of about one-sixth of the globe,
      approximately 20 million square nautical miles (nm).

  If: LaRes is expressed as value 3 (0x03 or 000011) and LoRes is
      expressed as value 3 (0x03 or 000011), then it would describe a
      geo-location area that is north from the equator to 63 degrees
      north, and -65 degrees to -128 degrees longitude.  This area
      includes south of a line from Anchorage, AL to eastern Nunavut,
      CN, and from the Amazons of northern Brazil to approximately
      4400km south-southwest of Los Angeles, CA.  This area would
      include North America, Central America, and parts of Venezuela
      and Columbia, except portions of Alaska and northern and eastern
      Canada, approximately 10 million square nm.

  If: LaRes is expressed as value 5 (0x05 or 000101) and LoRes is
      expressed as value 5 (0x05 or 000101), then it would describe a
      geo-location area that is latitude 32 north of the equator to
      latitude 48 and extends from -64 degrees to -80 degrees
      longitude.  This is approximately an east-west boundary of a time
      zone, an area of approximately 700,000 square nm.

  If: LaRes is expressed as value 9 (0x09 or 001001) and LoRes is
      expressed as value 9 (0x09 or 001001), which includes all the
      integer bits, then it would describe a geo-location area that is
      latitude 38 north of the equator to latitude 39 and extends from
      -77 degrees to -78 degrees longitude.  This is an area of
      approximately 9600 square km (111.3km x 86.5km).

  If: LaRes is expressed as value 18 (0x12 or 010010) and LoRes is
      expressed as value 18 (0x12 or 010010), then it would describe a
      geo-location area that is latitude 38.8984375 north to latitude
      38.9003906 and extends from -77.0390625 degrees to -77.0371094
      degrees longitude.  This is an area of approximately 36,600
      square meters (169m x 217m).

  If: LaRes is expressed as value 22 (0x16 or 010110) and LoRes is
      expressed as value 22 (0x16 or 010110), then it would describe a
      geo-location area that is latitude 38.896816 north to latitude
      38.8985596 and extends from -77.0372314 degrees to -77.0371094
      degrees longitude.  This is an area of approximately 143 square
      meters (10.5m x 13.6m).

  If: LaRes is expressed as value 28 (0x1c or 011100) and LoRes is
      expressed as value 28 (0x1c or 011100), then it would describe a
      geo-location area that is latitude 38.8986797 north to latitude





Polk, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 11]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004


      38.8986816 and extends from -77.0372314 degrees to -77.0372296
      degrees longitude.  This is an area of approximately 339 square
      centimeters (20.9cm x 16.23cm).

  If: LaRes is expressed as value 30 (0x1e or 011110) and LoRes is
      expressed as value 30 (0x1e or 011110), then it would describe a
      geo-location area that is latitude 38.8986797 north to latitude
      38.8986802 and extends from -77.0372300 degrees to -77.0372296
      degrees longitude.  This is an area of approximately 19.5 square
      centimeters (50mm x 39mm).

  If: LaRes is expressed as value 34 (0x22 or 100010) and LoRes is
      expressed as value 34 (0x22 or 100010), then it would describe a
      geo-location area that is latitude 38.8986800 north to latitude
      38.8986802 and extends from -77.0372300 degrees to -77.0372296
      degrees longitude.  This is an area of approximately 7.5 square
      millimeters (3.11mm x 2.42mm).

  In the (White House) example, the requirement of emergency responders
  in North America via their NENA Model Legislation [8] could be met by
  a LaRes value of 21 and a LoRes value of 20.  This would yield a
  geo-location that is latitude 38.8984375 north to latitude 38.8988616
  north and longitude -77.0371094 to longitude -77.0375977.  This is an
  area of approximately 89 feet by 75 feet or 6669 square feet, which
  is very close to the 7000 square feet requested by NENA.  In this
  example, a service provider could enforce that a device send a
  Location Configuration Information with this minimum amount of
  resolution for this particular location when calling emergency
  services.

A.2.  Location Configuration Information of "Sears Tower" (Example 2)

  Postal Address:
     Sears Tower
     103rd Floor
     233 S. Wacker Dr.
     Chicago, IL  60606

  Viewing the Chicago area from the Observation Deck of the Sears
  Tower.

  Latitude 41.87884 degrees North (or +41.87884 degrees)
  Using 2s complement, 34 bit fixed point, 25 bit fraction
  Latitude = 0x053c1f751,
  Latitude = 0001010011110000011111011101010001






Polk, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 12]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004


  Longitude 87.63602 degrees West (or -87.63602 degrees)
  Using 2s complement, 34 bit fixed point, 25 bit fraction
  Longitude = 0xf50ba5b97,
  Longitude = 1101010000101110100101101110010111

  Altitude 103

  In this example, we are inside a structure, therefore we will assume
  an altitude value of 103 to indicate the floor we are on.  The
  Altitude Type value is 2, indicating floors.  The AltRes field would
  indicate that all bits in the Altitude field are true, as we want to
  accurately represent the floor of the structure where we are located.

  AltRes = 30, 0x1e, 011110
  AT = 2, 0x02, 000010
  Altitude = 103, 0x00006700, 000000000000000110011100000000

  For the accuracy of the latitude and longitude, the best information
  available to us was supplied by a generic mapping service that shows
  a single geo-loc for all of the Sears Tower.  Therefore we are going
  to show LaRes as value 18 (0x12 or 010010) and LoRes as value 18
  (0x12 or 010010).  This would be describing a geo-location area that
  is latitude 41.8769531 to latitude 41.8789062 and extends from
  -87.6367188 degrees to -87.6347657 degrees longitude.  This is an
  area of approximately 373412 square feet (713.3 ft. x 523.5 ft.).

6.  References

6.1.  Normative References

  [1] Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol", RFC 2131, March
      1997.

  [2] Patrick, M., "DHCP Relay Agent Information Option", RFC 3046,
      January 2001.

  [3]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
      Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

  [4] Droms, R. and W. Arbaugh, "Authentication for DHCP Messages", RFC
      3118, June 2001.

  [5] European Petroleum Survey Group, http://www.epsg.org/ and
      http://www.ihsenergy.com/epsg/geodetic2.html

  [6] World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84), MIL-STD-2401,
      http://www.wgs84.com/




Polk, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 13]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004


6.2.  Informational References

  [7] Farrell, C., Schulze, M., Pleitner, S. and D. Baldoni, "DNS
      Encoding of Geographical Location", RFC 1712, November 1994.

  [8] National Emergency Number Association (NENA) www.nena.org NENA
      Technical Information Document on Model Legislation Enhanced 911
      for Multi-Line Telephone Systems.

7.  Author Information

  James M. Polk
  Cisco Systems
  2200 East President George Bush Turnpike
  Richardson, Texas 75082 USA

  EMail: [email protected]


  John Schnizlein
  Cisco Systems
  9123 Loughran Road
  Fort Washington, MD 20744 USA

  EMail: [email protected]


  Marc Linsner
  Cisco Systems
  Marco Island, FL 34145 USA

  EMail: [email protected]



















Polk, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 14]

RFC 3825             DHCP Option for Coordinate LCI            July 2004


8.  Full Copyright Statement

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).  This document is subject
  to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
  except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.

  This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
  "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
  OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
  ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
  INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
  INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
  WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

  The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
  Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
  pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
  this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
  might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
  made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
  on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
  found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

  Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
  assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
  attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
  such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
  specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
  http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

  The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
  copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
  rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
  this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
  [email protected].

Acknowledgement

  Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
  Internet Society.









Polk, et al.                Standards Track                    [Page 15]