Network Working Group                                     J. Manner, Ed.
Request for Comments: 3753                                  M. Kojo, Ed.
Category: Informational                                        June 2004


                     Mobility Related Terminology

Status of this Memo

  This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
  not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
  memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).

Abstract

  There is a need for common definitions of terminology in the work to
  be done around IP mobility.  This document defines terms for mobility
  related terminology.  The document originated out of work done in the
  Seamoby Working Group but has broader applicability for terminology
  used in IETF-wide discourse on technology for mobility and IP
  networks.  Other working groups dealing with mobility may want to
  take advantage of this terminology.

Table of Contents

  1.  Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
  2.  General Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
  3.  Mobile Access Networks and Mobile Networks. . . . . . . . . .  10
  4.  Handover Terminology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
      4.1.  Scope of Handover . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
      4.2.  Handover Control. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
      4.3.  Simultaneous connectivity to Access Routers . . . . . .  19
      4.4.  Performance and Functional Aspects. . . . . . . . . . .  19
      4.5.  Micro Diversity, Macro Diversity, and IP Diversity. . .  21
      4.6.  Paging, and Mobile Node States and Modes. . . . . . . .  22
      4.7.  Context Transfer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  24
      4.8.  Candidate Access Router Discovery . . . . . . . . . . .  24
      4.9.  Types of Mobility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  25
  5.  Specific Terminology for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networking . . . . . .  26
  6.  Security-related Terminology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  27
  7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  28
  8.  Contributors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  28
  9.  Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  29
  10. Informative References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  29



Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 1]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  11. Appendix A - Index of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  31
  12. Authors' Addresses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  35
  13. Full Copyright Statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  36

1.  Introduction

  This document presents terminology to be used for documents and
  discussions within the Seamoby Working Group.  Other mobility related
  working groups could take advantage of this terminology, in order to
  create a common terminology for the area of mobility in IP networks.

  Some terms and their definitions that are not directly related to the
  IP world are included for the purpose of harmonizing the terminology.
  For example, 'Access Point' and 'base station' refer to the same
  component, from the point of view of IP, but 'Access Router' has a
  very different meaning.  The presented terminology may also, it is
  hoped, be adequate to cover mobile ad-hoc networks.

  The proposed terminology is not meant to assert any new terminology.
  Rather the authors would welcome discussion on more exact definitions
  as well as missing or unnecessary terms.  This work is a
  collaborative enterprise between people from many different
  engineering backgrounds and so already presents a first step in
  harmonizing the terminology.

  The terminology in this document is divided into several sections.
  First, there is a list of terms for general use and mobile access
  networks followed by terms related to handovers, and finally some
  terms used within the MANET and NEMO working groups.

2.  General Terms

  Bandwidth

     The total width of the frequency band available to or used by a
     communications channel.  Usually measured in Hertz (Hz).  The
     bandwidth of a channel limits the available channel capacity.

  Bandwidth utilization

     The actual rate of information transfer achieved over a link,
     expressed as a percentage of the theoretical maximum channel
     capacity on that link, according to Shannon's Law.








Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 2]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Beacon

     A control message broadcast by a node (especially, a base station)
     informing all the other nodes in its neighborhood of the
     continuing presence of the broadcasting node, possibly along with
     additional status or configuration information.

  Binding Update (BU)

     A message indicating a mobile node's current mobility binding, and
     in particular its care-of address.

  Care-of-Address (CoA)

     An IP address associated with a mobile node while visiting a
     foreign link; the subnet prefix of this IP address is a foreign
     subnet prefix.  A packet addressed to the mobile node which
     arrives at the mobile node's home network when the mobile node is
     away from home and has registered a Care-of Address will be
     forwarded to that address by the Home Agent in the home network.

  Channel

     A subdivision of the physical medium allowing possibly shared
     independent uses of the medium.  Channels may be made available by
     subdividing the medium into distinct time slots, or distinct
     spectral bands, or decorrelated coding sequences.

  Channel access protocol

     A protocol for mediating access to, and possibly allocation of,
     the various channels available within the physical communications
     medium.  Nodes participating in the channel access protocol agree
     to communicate only when they have uncontested access to one of
     the channels, so that there will be no interference.

  Channel capacity

     The total capacity of a link to carry information (typically bits)
     per unit time.  With a given bandwidth, the theoretical maximum
     channel capacity is given by Shannon's Law.  The actual channel
     capacity of a channel is determined by the channel bandwidth, the
     coding system used, and the signal to noise ratio.








Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 3]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Control message

     Information passed between two or more network nodes for
     maintaining protocol state, which may be unrelated to any specific
     application.

  Distance vector

     A characteristic of some routing protocols in which, for each
     desired destination, a node maintains information about the
     distance to that destination, and a vector (next hop) towards that
     destination.

  Fairness

     A property of channel access protocols whereby a medium is made
     fairly available to all eligible nodes on the link.  Fairness does
     not strictly imply equality, especially in cases where nodes are
     given link access according to unequal priority or classification.

  Flooding

     The process of delivering data or control messages to every node
     within the network under consideration.

  Foreign subnet prefix

     A bit string that consists of some number of initial bits of an IP
     address which identifies a node's foreign link within the Internet
     topology.

  Forwarding node

     A node which performs the function of forwarding datagrams from
     one of its neighbors to another.

  Home Address (HoA)

     An IP address assigned to a mobile node, used as the permanent
     address of the mobile node.  This address is within the mobile
     node's home link.  Standard IP routing mechanisms will deliver
     packets destined for a mobile node's home address to its home link
     [9].








Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 4]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Home Agent (HA)

     A router on a mobile node's home link with which the mobile node
     has registered its current care-of address.  While the mobile node
     is away from home, the home agent intercepts packets on the home
     link destined to the mobile node's home address, encapsulates
     them, and tunnels them to the mobile node's registered care-of
     address.

  Home subnet prefix

     A bit string that consists of some number of initial bits of an IP
     address which identifies a node's home link within the Internet
     topology (i.e., the IP subnet prefix corresponding to the mobile
     node's home address, as defined in [9]).

  Interface

     A node's point of attachment to a link.

  IP access address

     An IP address (often dynamically allocated) which a node uses to
     designate its current point of attachment to the local network.
     The IP access address is typically to be distinguished from the
     mobile node's home address; in fact, while visiting a foreign
     network the IP access address may be considered unsuitable for use
     as an end-point address by any but the most short-lived
     applications.  Instead, the IP access address is typically used as
     the care-of address of the node.

  Link

     A communication facility or physical medium that can sustain data
     communications between multiple network nodes, such as an Ethernet
     (simple or bridged).  A link is the layer immediately below IP.
     In a layered network stack model, the Link Layer (Layer 2) is
     normally below the Network (IP) Layer (Layer 3), and above the
     Physical Layer (Layer 1).

  Asymmetric link

     A link with transmission characteristics which are different
     depending upon the relative position or design characteristics of
     the transmitter and the receiver of data on the link.  For
     instance, the range of one transmitter may be much higher than the
     range of another transmitter on the same medium.




Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 5]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Link establishment

     The process of establishing a link between the mobile node and the
     local network.  This may involve allocating a channel, or other
     local wireless resources, possibly including a minimum level of
     service or bandwidth.

  Link-layer trigger (L2 Trigger)

     Information from the link layer that informs the network layer of
     the detailed events involved in handover sequencing at the link
     layer.  L2 triggers are not specific to any particular link layer,
     but rather represent generalizations of link layer information
     available from a wide variety of link layer protocols [4].

  Link state

     A characterization of some routing protocols in which every node
     within the network is expected to maintain information about every
     link within the network topology.

  Link-level acknowledgment

     A protocol strategy, typically employed over wireless media,
     requiring neighbors to acknowledge receipt of packets (typically
     unicast only) from the transmitter.  Such strategies aim to avoid
     packet loss or delay resulting from lack of, or unwanted
     characteristics of, higher level protocols.  Link-layer
     acknowledgments are often used as part of Automatic Repeat-Request
     (ARQ) algorithms for increasing link reliability.

  Local broadcast

     The delivery of data to every node within range of the
     transmitter.

  Loop-free

     A property of routing protocols whereby the path taken by a data
     packet from source to destination never traverses through the same
     intermediate node twice before arrival at the destination.










Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 6]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Medium Access Protocol (MAC)

     A protocol for mediating access to, and possibly allocation of,
     the physical communications medium.  Nodes participating in the
     medium access protocol can communicate only when they have
     uncontested access to the medium, so that there will be no
     interference.  When the physical medium is a radio channel, the
     MAC is the same as the Channel Access Protocol.

  Mobile network prefix

     A bit string that consists of some number of initial bits of an IP
     address which identifies the entire mobile network within the
     Internet topology.  All nodes in a mobile network necessarily have
     an address containing this prefix.

  Mobility factor

     The relative frequency of node movement, compared to the frequency
     of application initiation.

  Multipoint relay (MPR)

     A node which is selected by its one-hop neighbor to re-transmit
     all broadcast messages that it receives.  The message must be new
     and the time-to-live field of the message must be greater than
     one.  Multipoint relaying is a technique to reduce the number of
     redundant re-transmissions while diffusing a broadcast message in
     the network.

  Neighbor

     A "neighbor" is any other node to which data may be propagated
     directly over the communications medium without relying on the
     assistance of any other forwarding node.

  Neighborhood

     All the nodes which can receive data on the same link from one
     node whenever it transmits data.

  Next hop

     A neighbor which has been selected to forward packets along the
     way to a particular destination.






Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 7]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Payload

     The actual data within a packet, not including network protocol
     headers which were not inserted by an application.  Note that
     payloads are different between layers:  application data is the
     payload of TCP, which are the payload of IP, which three are the
     payload of link layer protocols etc.  Thus, it is important to
     identify the scope when talking about payloads.

  Prefix

     A bit string that consists of some number of initial bits of an
     address.

  Routing table

     The table where forwarding nodes keep information (including next
     hop) for various destinations.

  Route entry

     An entry for a specific destination (unicast or multicast) in the
     routing table.

  Route establishment

     The process of determining a route between a source and a
     destination.

  Route activation

     The process of putting a route into use after it has been
     determined.

  Routing proxy

     A node that routes packets by overlays, e.g., by tunneling,
     between communicating partners.  The Home Agent and Foreign Agent
     are examples of routing proxies, in that they receive packets
     destined for the mobile node and tunnel them to the current
     address of the mobile node.










Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 8]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Shannon's Law

     A statement defining the theoretical maximum rate at which error-
     free digits can be transmitted over a bandwidth-limited channel in
     the presence of noise.  No practical error correction coding
     system exists that can closely approach the theoretical
     performance limit given by Shannon's law.

  Signal strength

     The detectable power of the signal carrying the data bits, as seen
     by the receiver of the signal.

  Source route

     A source route from node A to node B is an ordered list of IP
     addresses, starting with the IP address of node A and ending with
     the IP address of the node B.  Between A and B, the source route
     includes an ordered list of intermediate hops between A and B, as
     well as the interface index of the interface through which the
     packet should be transmitted to reach the next hop.  The list of
     intermediate hops might not include all visited nodes, some hops
     might be omitted for a reason or another.

  Spatial re-use

     Simultaneous use of channels with identical or close physical
     characteristics, but located spatially far enough apart to avoid
     interference (i.e., co-channel interference)

  System-wide broadcast

     Same as flooding, but used in contrast to local broadcast.

  Subnet

     A subnet is a logical group of connected network nodes.  In IP
     networks, nodes in a subnet share a common network mask (in IPV4)
     or a network prefix (in IPv6).

  Topology (Network Topology)

     The interconnection structure of a network: which nodes are
     directly connected to each other, and through which links they are
     connected.  Some simple topologies have been given names, such as
     for instance 'bus topology', 'mesh topology', 'ring topology',
     'star topology' and 'tree topology'.




Manner & Kojo                Informational                      [Page 9]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Triggered update

     A solicited route update transmitted by a router along a path to a
     destination.

3.  Mobile Access Networks and Mobile Networks

  In order to support host mobility a set of nodes towards the network
  edge may need to have specific functions.  Such a set of nodes forms
  a mobile access network that may or may not be part of the global
  Internet.  Figure 1 presents two examples of such access network
  topologies.  The figure depicts a reference architecture which
  illustrates an IP network with components defined in this section.

  We intend to define the concept of the Access Network (AN) which may
  also support enhanced mobility.  It is possible that to support
  routing and QoS for mobile nodes, existing routing protocols (e.g.,
  Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) [14]) may not be appropriate to
  maintain forwarding information for these mobile nodes as they change
  their points of attachment to the Access Network.  These new
  functions are implemented in routers with additional capabilities.
  We can distinguish three types of Access Network components: Access
  Routers (AR) which handle the last hop to the mobile, typically over
  a wireless link; Access Network Gateways (ANG) which form the
  boundary on the fixed network side and shield the fixed network from
  the specialized routing protocols; and (optionally) other internal
  Access Network Routers which may also be needed in some cases to
  support the functions.  The Access Network consists of the equipment
  needed to support this specialized routing, i.e., AR or ANG.  AR and
  ANG may be the same physical nodes.

  In addition, we present a few basic terms on mobile networks, that
  is, mobile network, mobile router (MR), and mobile network node
  (MNN).  More terminology for discussing mobile networks can be found
  in [13].  A more thorough discussion of mobile networks can be found
  in the working group documents of the NEMO Working Group.

  Note: this reference architecture is not well suited for people
  dealing with Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANET).












Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 10]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


                                                                  |
                                                                  |
                    ---        ------                    -------  |
       ---  | <-->  | | -------| AR | -------------------|     |  |
       | |--[]      ---        /------          \       /| ANG |--|
       ---            AP      /                  \     / |     |  |
        MH                   /                    \   /  -------  |
  (with wireless     ___    /                    -------          |
       device)       | |----                     | ANR |          |
                     ---                         -------          |
                      AP                          /   \           |
                                                 /     \ -------  |
                    ---       ------            /       \|     |  |
                    | |-------| AR |---------------------| ANG |--|
                    ---       ------                     |     |  |
                     AP                                  -------  |
                                                                  |
                         Access Network (AN) 1                    |
  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  -|
                         Access Network (AN) 2                    |
                                                                  |
                                                                  |
                    ---        ------                    -------  |
      ---  | <-->   | | -------| AR | -------------------|     |  |
      | |--[]       ---       /------                   /| ANG |--|
      ---            AP      /                         / |     |  |
       MH                   /                         /  -------  |
  (with wireless    ___    /                         /            |
      device)       | |----                         /             |
                    ---                            /              |
                     AP                           /               |
                                                 /                |
      |            ---       ------         -------               |
  --- |       | <->| |-------| AR |---------| ANR |               |
  | |-|      []    ---  \    ------         -------               |
  --- |  -----|     AP   \                  /                     |
  MNN |--i MR e           \                /                      |
      |  ------    ---     \ ------       /                       |
  --- | (with      | |-------| AR |-------                        |
  | |-| wireless   ---       ------                               |
  --- |  device)    AP                                            |
  MNN                                 'i': MR ingress interface   |
                                      'e': MR egress interface    |
                                                                  |

               Figure 1: Reference Network Architecture





Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 11]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Mobile Node (MN)

     An IP node capable of changing its point of attachment to the
     network.  A Mobile Node may either be a Mobile Host (no forwarding
     functionality) or a Mobile Router (forwarding functionality).

  Mobile Host (MH)

     A mobile node that is an end host and not a router.  A Mobile Host
     is capable of sending and receiving packets, that is, being a
     source or destination of traffic, but not a forwarder of it.

  Fixed Node (FN)

     A node, either a host or a router, unable to change its point of
     attachment to the network and its IP address without breaking open
     sessions.

  Mobile network

     An entire network, moving as a unit, which dynamically changes its
     point of attachment to the Internet and thus its reachability in
     the topology.  The mobile network is composed of one or more IP-
     subnets and is connected to the global Internet via one or more
     Mobile Routers (MR).  The internal configuration of the mobile
     network is assumed to be relatively stable with respect to the MR.

  Mobile Router (MR)

     A router capable of changing its point of attachment to the
     network, moving from one link to another link.  The MR is capable
     of forwarding packets between two or more interfaces, and possibly
     running a dynamic routing protocol modifying the state by which it
     does packet forwarding.

     A MR acting as a gateway between an entire mobile network and the
     rest of the Internet has one or more egress interface(s)  and one
     or more ingress interface(s).  Packets forwarded upstream to the
     rest of the Internet are transmitted through one of the MR's
     egress interface; packets forwarded downstream to the mobile
     network are transmitted through one of the MR's ingress interface.

  Ingress interface

     The interface of a MR attached to a link inside the mobile
     network.





Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 12]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Egress interface

     The interface of a MR attached to the home link if the MR is at
     home, or attached to a foreign link if the MR is in a foreign
     network.

  Mobile Network Node (MNN)

     Any node (host or router) located within a mobile network, either
     permanently or temporarily.  A Mobile Network Node may either be a
     mobile node or a fixed node.

  Access Link (AL)

     A last-hop link between a Mobile Node and an Access Point.  That
     is, a facility or medium over which an Access Point and the Mobile
     Node can communicate at the link layer, i.e., the layer
     immediately below IP.

  Access Point (AP)

     An Access Point is a layer 2 device which is connected to one or
     more Access Routers and offers the wireless link connection to the
     Mobile Node.  Access Points are sometimes called base stations or
     access point transceivers.  An Access Point may be a separate
     entity or co-located with an Access Router.

  Radio Cell

     The geographical area within which an Access Point provides radio
     coverage, i.e., where radio communication between a Mobile Node
     and the specific Access Point is possible.

  Access Network Router (ANR)

     An IP router in the Access Network.  An Access Network Router may
     include Access Network specific functionalities, for example,
     related to mobility and/or QoS.  This is to distinguish between
     ordinary routers and routers that have Access Network-related
     special functionality.











Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 13]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Access Router (AR)

     An Access Network Router residing on the edge of an Access Network
     and connected to one or more Access Points.  The Access Points may
     be of different technology.  An Access Router offers IP
     connectivity to Mobile Nodes, acting as a default router to the
     Mobile Nodes it is currently serving.  The Access Router may
     include intelligence beyond a simple forwarding service offered by
     ordinary IP routers.

  Access Network Gateway (ANG)

     An Access Network Router that separates an Access Network from
     other IP networks, much in the same way as an ordinary gateway
     router.  The Access Network Gateway looks to the other IP networks
     like a standard IP router.  In a small network, an ANG may also
     offer the services of an AR, namely offer the IP connectivity to
     the mobile nodes.

  Access Network (AN)

     An IP network which includes one or more Access Network Routers.

  Administrative Domain (AD)

     A collection of networks under the same administrative control and
     grouped together for administrative purposes [5].

  Serving Access Router (SAR)

     The Access Router currently offering the connectivity to the MN.
     This is usually the point of departure for the MN as it makes its
     way towards a new Access Router (at which time the Serving Access
     Router takes the role of the Previous Access Router).  There may
     be several Serving Access Routers serving the Mobile Node at the
     same time.

  New Access Router (NAR)

     The Access Router that offers connectivity to the Mobile Node
     after a handover.










Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 14]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Previous Access Router (PAR)

     An Access Router that offered connectivity to the Mobile Node
     prior to a handover.  This is the Serving Access Router that will
     cease or has ceased to offer connectivity to the Mobile Node.
     Often also called Old Access Router (OAR).

  Candidate Access Router (CAR)

     An Access Router to which the Mobile Node may do a handoff.  See
     Section 4.8.

4.  Handover Terminology

  These terms refer to different perspectives and approaches to
  supporting different aspects of mobility.  Distinctions can be made
  according to the scope, range overlap, performance characteristics,
  diversity characteristics, state transitions, mobility types, and
  control modes of handover techniques.

  Roaming

     An operator-based term involving formal agreements between
     operators that allows a mobile to get connectivity from a foreign
     network.  Roaming (a particular aspect of user mobility) includes,
     for example, the functionality by which users can communicate
     their identity to the local AN so that inter-AN agreements can be
     activated and service and applications in the MN's home network
     can be made available to the user locally.

  Handover

     The process by which an active MN (in the Active State, see
     section 4.6) changes its point of attachment to the network, or
     when such a change is attempted.  The access network may provide
     features to minimize the interruption to sessions in progress.
     Also called handoff.

     There are different types of handover classified according to
     different aspects involved in the handover.  Some of this
     terminology follows the description in [4].










Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 15]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


4.1.  Scope of Handover

  Layer 2 handover

     A handover where the MN changes APs (or some other aspect of the
     radio channel) connected to the same AR's interface.  This type of
     handover is transparent to the routing at the IP layer (or it
     appears simply as a link layer reconfiguration without any
     mobility implications).

  Intra-AR handover

     A handover which changes the AR's network interface to the mobile.
     That is, the Serving AR remains the same but routing changes
     internal to the AR take place.

  Intra-AN handover

     A handover where the MN changes ARs inside the same AN.  Such a
     handover is not necessarily visible outside the AN.  In case the
     ANG serving the MN changes, this handover is seen outside the AN
     due to a change in the routing paths.  Note that the ANG may
     change for only some of the MN's data flows.

  Inter-AN handover

     A handover where the MN moves to a new AN.  This requires support
     for macro mobility.  Note that this would have to involve the
     assignment of a new IP access address (e.g., a new care-of
     address) to the MN.

  Intra-technology handover

     A handover between equipment of the same technology.

  Inter-technology handover

     A handover between equipment of different technologies.

  Horizontal handover

     This involves MNs moving between access points of the same type
     (in terms of coverage, data rate and mobility), such as, UMTS to
     UMTS, or WLAN to WLAN.







Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 16]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Vertical handover

     This involves MNs moving between access points of different type,
     such as, UMTS to WLAN.

  Note that the difference between a horizontal and vertical handover
  is vague.  For example, a handover from an AP with 802.11b WLAN link
  to an AP with 802.11g WLAN link may be considered as either a
  vertical or a horizontal handover, depending on an individual's point
  of view.

  Note also that the IP layer sees network interfaces and IP addresses,
  rather than specific technologies used by those interfaces.  Thus,
  horizontal and vertical handovers may or may not be noticed at the IP
  layer.  Usually a handover can be noticed if the IP address assigned
  to the interface changes, the network interface itself changes (which
  can also change the IP address), or there is a link outage, for
  example, when the mobile node moves out of coverage for a while.  For
  example, in a GPRS network a horizontal handover happens usually
  unnoticed by the IP layer.  Similarly, a WLAN horizontal handover may
  be noticed if the IP address of the interface changes.  On the other
  hand, vertical handovers often change the network interface and are,
  therefore, noticed on the IP layer.  Still, some specific network
  cards may be able to switch between access technologies (e.g., GPRS
  to UMTS) without changing the network interface.  Moreover, either of
  the two handovers may or may not result in changing the AR.  For
  example, an AR could control WLAN and Bluetooth access points, and
  the mobile node could do horizontal and vertical handovers under the
  same AR without changing its IP address or even the network
  interface.

4.2.  Handover Control

  A handover must be one of the following two types (a):

     Mobile-initiated handover

        The MN is the one that makes the initial decision to initiate
        the handover.

     Network-initiated handover

        The network makes the initial decision to initiate the
        handover.







Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 17]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  A handover is also one of the following two types (b):

     Mobile-controlled handover

        The MN has the primary control over the handover process.

     Network-controlled handover

        The network has the primary control over the handover process.

  A handover decision usually involves some sort of measurements about
  when and where to handover to.  Therefore, a handover is also either
  of these three types (c):

     Mobile-assisted handover

        Information and measurement from the MN are used by the AR to
        decide on the execution of a handover.

     Network-assisted handover

        A handover where the AN collects information that can be used
        by the MN in a handover decision.

     Unassisted handover

        A handover where no assistance is provided by the MN or the AR
        to each other.

  Note that it is possible that the MN and the AR both do measurements
  and decide on the handover.

  A handover is also one of the following two types (d):

     Push handover

        A handover either initiated by the PAR, or where the MN
        initiates a handover via the PAR.

     Pull handover

        A handover either initiated by the NAR, or where the MN
        initiates a handover via the NAR.








Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 18]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  The handover is also either proactive or reactive (e):

     Planned handover

        A proactive (expected) handover where some signaling can be
        done in advance of the MN getting connected to the new AR,
        e.g., building a temporary tunnel from the previous AR to the
        new AR.

     Unplanned handover

        A reactive (unexpected) handover where no signaling is done in
        advance of the MN's move from the previous AR to the new AR.

  The five handover types (a-e) are mostly independent, and every
  handover should be classifiable according to each of these types.

4.3.  Simultaneous connectivity to Access Routers

  Make-before-break (MBB)

     During a MBB handover the MN makes the new connection before the
     old one is broken.  Thus, the MN can communicate simultaneously
     with the old and new AR during the handover.  This should not be
     confused with "soft handover" which relies on macro diversity,
     described in Section 4.5.

  Break-before-make (BBM)

     During a BBM handover the MN breaks the old connection before the
     new connection is made.  Thus, the MN cannot communicate
     simultaneously with the old and the new AR.

4.4.  Performance and Functional Aspects

  Handover latency

     Handover latency is the difference between the time a MN is last
     able to send and/or receive an IP packet by way of the PAR, and
     the time the MN is able to send and/or receive an IP packet
     through the NAR.  Adapted from [4].

  Smooth handover

     A handover that aims primarily to minimize packet loss, with no
     explicit concern for additional delays in packet forwarding.





Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 19]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Fast handover

     A handover that aims primarily to minimize handover latency, with
     no explicit interest in packet loss.

  Seamless handover

     A handover in which there is no change in service capability,
     security, or quality.  In practice, some degradation in service is
     to be expected.  The definition of a seamless handover in the
     practical case should be that other protocols, applications, or
     end users do not detect any change in service capability, security
     or quality, which would have a bearing on their (normal)
     operation.  As a consequence, what would be a seamless handover
     for one less demanding application might not be seamless for
     another more demanding application.  See [7] for more discussion
     on the topic.

  Throughput

     The amount of data from a source to a destination processed by the
     protocol for which throughput is to be measured, for instance, IP,
     TCP, or the MAC protocol.  The throughput differs between protocol
     layers.

  Goodput

     The total bandwidth used, less the volume of control messages,
     protocol overhead from the data packets, and packets dropped due
     to CRC errors.

  Pathloss

     A reduction in signal strength caused by traversing the physical
     medium constituting the link.

  Hidden-terminal problem

     The problem whereby a transmitting node can fail in its attempt to
     transmit data because of destructive interference which is only
     detectable at the receiving node, not the transmitting node.

  Exposed terminal problem

     The problem whereby a transmitting node A prevents another node B
     from transmitting, although node B could have safely transmitted
     to anyone else but the transmitting node A.




Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 20]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


4.5.  Micro Diversity, Macro Diversity, and IP Diversity

  Certain air interfaces (e.g., the Universal Mobile Telephone System
  (UMTS) Terrestrial Radio Access Network (UTRAN) running in Frequency
  Division Duplex (FDD) mode)  require or at least support macro
  diversity combining.  Essentially, this refers to the fact that a
  single MN is able to send and receive over two independent radio
  channels ('diversity branches') at the same time; the information
  received over different branches is compared and that from the better
  branch passed to the upper layers.  This can be used both to improve
  overall performance, and to provide a seamless type of handover at
  layer 2, since a new branch can be added before the old is deleted.
  See also [6].

  It is necessary to differentiate between combining/diversity that
  occurs at the physical and radio link layers, where the relevant unit
  of data is the radio frame, and that which occurs at layer 3, the
  network layer, where what is considered is the IP packet itself.

  In the following definitions micro- and macro diversity refer to
  protocol layers below the network layer, and IP diversity refers to
  the network layer.

  Micro diversity

     For example, two antennas on the same transmitter send the same
     signal to a receiver over a slightly different path to overcome
     fading.

  Macro diversity

     Duplicating or combining actions taking place over multiple APs,
     possibly attached to different ARs.  This may require support from
     the network layer to move the radio frames between the base
     stations and a central combining point.

  IP diversity

     Refers to the process of duplicating IP packets and sending them
     to the receiver through more than one point of attachment.  This
     is semantically allowed by IP because it does not guarantee packet
     uniqueness, and higher level protocols are assumed to eliminate
     duplicates whenever that is important for the application.








Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 21]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


4.6.  Paging, and Mobile Node States and Modes

  Mobile systems may employ the use of MN states in order to operate
  more efficiently without degrading the performance of the system.
  The term 'mode' is also common and means the same as 'state'.

  A MN is always in one of the following three states:

  Active state

     When the AN knows the MN's SAR and the MN can send and receive IP
     packets.  The access link may not be active, but the radio layer
     is able to establish one without assistance from the network
     layer.  The MN has an IP address assigned.

  Dormant state

     A state in which the mobile restricts its ability to receive
     normal IP traffic by reducing its monitoring of radio channels.
     The AN knows the MN's Paging Area, but the MN has no SAR and so
     packets cannot be delivered to the MN without the AN initiating
     paging.  Often also called Idle state.

     Time-slotted dormant mode

        A dormant mode implementation in which the mobile alternates
        between periods of not listening for any radio traffic and
        listening for traffic.  Time-slotted dormant mode
        implementations are typically synchronized with the network so
        the network can deliver paging messages to the mobile during
        listening periods.

  Inactive state

     the MN is in neither the Active nor Dormant State.  The MN is no
     longer listening for any packets, not even periodically, and not
     sending packets.  The MN may be in a powered off state, it may
     have shut down all interfaces to drastically conserve power, or it
     may be out of range of a radio access point.  The MN does not
     necessarily have an IP access address from the AN.

  Note: in fact, as well as the MN being in one of these three states,
  the AN also stores which state it believes the MN is in.  Normally
  these are consistent; the definitions above assume so.

  Here are some additional definitions for paging, taking into account
  the above state definitions.




Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 22]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Paging

     A procedure initiated by the Access Network to move a Dormant MN
     into the Active State.  As a result of paging, the MN establishes
     a SAR and the IP routes are set up.

  Location updating

     A procedure initiated by the MN, by which it informs the AN that
     it has moved into a new paging area.

  Paging area

     A part of the Access Network, typically containing a number of
     ARs/APs, which corresponds to some geographical area.  The AN
     keeps and updates a list of all the Dormant MNs present in the
     area.  If the MN is within the radio coverage of the area it will
     be able to receive paging messages sent within that Paging Area.

  Paging area registrations

     Signaling from a dormant mode mobile node to the network, by which
     it establishes its presence in a new paging area.  Paging Area
     Registrations thus enable the network to maintain a rough idea of
     where the mobile is located.

  Paging channel

     A radio channel dedicated to signaling dormant mode mobiles for
     paging purposes.  By current practice, the paging channel carries
     only control traffic necessary for the radio link, although some
     paging protocols have provision for carrying arbitrary traffic
     (and thus could potentially be used to carry IP).

  Traffic channel

     The radio channel on which IP traffic to an active mobile is
     typically sent.  This channel is used by a mobile that is actively
     sending and receiving IP traffic, and is not continuously active
     in a dormant mode mobile.  For some radio link protocols, this may
     be the only channel available.










Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 23]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


4.7.  Context Transfer

  Context

     The information on the current state of a routing-related service
     required to re-establish the routing-related service on a new
     subnet without having to perform the entire protocol exchange with
     the MN from scratch.

  Feature context

     The collection of information representing the context for a given
     feature.  The full context associated with a MN is the collection
     of one or more feature contexts.

  Context transfer

     The movement of context from one router or other network entity to
     another as a means of re-establishing routing-related services on
     a new subnet or collection of subnets.

  Routing-related service

     A modification to the default routing treatment of packets to and
     from the MN.  Initially establishing routing-related services
     usually requires a protocol exchange with the MN.  An example of a
     routing-related service is header compression.  The service may
     also be indirectly related to routing, for example, security.
     Security may not affect the forwarding decision of all
     intermediate routers, but a packet may be dropped if it fails a
     security check (can't be encrypted, authentication failed, etc.).
     Dropping the packet is basically a routing decision.

4.8.  Candidate Access Router Discovery

  Capability of an AR

     A characteristic of the service offered by an AR that may be of
     interest to an MN when the AR is being considered as a handoff
     candidate.

  Candidate AR (CAR)

     An AR to which MN has a choice of performing IP-level handoff.
     This means that MN has the right radio interface to connect to an
     AP that is served by this AR, as well as the coverage of this AR
     overlaps with that of the AR to which MN is currently attached.




Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 24]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Target AR (TAR)

     An AR with which the procedures for the MN's IP-level handoff are
     initiated.  TAR is selected after running a TAR Selection
     Algorithm that takes into account the capabilities of CARs,
     preferences of MN and any local policies.

4.9.  Types of Mobility

  We can differentiate between host and network mobility, and various
  types of network mobility.  Terminology related more to applications
  such as the Session Initiation Protocol, such as personal mobility,
  is out of scope for this document.

     Host mobility support

        Refers to the function of allowing a mobile node to change its
        point of attachment to the network, without interrupting IP
        packet delivery to/from that node.  There may be different sub-
        functions depending on what the current level of service is
        being provided; in particular, support for host mobility
        usually implies active and dormant modes of operation,
        depending on whether the node has any current sessions or not.
        Access Network procedures are required to keep track of the
        current point of attachment of all the MNs or establish it at
        will.  Accurate location and routing procedures are required in
        order to maintain the integrity of the communication.  Host
        mobility is often called 'terminal mobility'.

     Network mobility support

        Refers to the function of allowing an entire network to change
        its point of attachment to the Internet, and, thus, its
        reachability in the topology, without interrupting IP packet
        delivery to/from that mobile network.

  Two subcategories of mobility can be identified within both host
  mobility and network mobility:

     Global mobility

        Same as Macro mobility.

     Local mobility

        Same as Micro mobility.





Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 25]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


     Macro mobility

        Mobility over a large area.  This includes mobility support and
        associated address registration procedures that are needed when
        a MN moves between IP domains.  Inter-AN handovers typically
        involve macro-mobility protocols.  Mobile-IP can be seen as a
        means to provide macro mobility.

     Micro mobility

        Mobility over a small area.  Usually this means mobility within
        an IP domain with an emphasis on support for active mode using
        handover, although it may include idle mode procedures also.
        Micro-mobility protocols exploit the locality of movement by
        confining movement related changes and signaling to the access
        network.

     Local mobility management

        Local mobility management (LMM) is a generic term for protocols
        dealing with IP mobility management confined within the access
        network.  LMM messages are not routed outside the access
        network, although a handover may trigger Mobile IP messages to
        be sent to correspondent nodes and home agents.

5.  Specific Terminology for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networking

  Cluster

     A group of nodes located within close physical proximity,
     typically all within range of one another, which can be grouped
     together for the purpose of limiting the production and
     propagation of routing information.

  Cluster head

     A cluster head is a node (often elected in the cluster formation
     process) that has complete knowledge about group membership and
     link state information in the cluster.  Each cluster should have
     one and only one cluster head.

  Cluster member

     All nodes within a cluster except the cluster head are called
     members of that cluster.






Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 26]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Convergence

     The process of approaching a state of equilibrium in which all
     nodes in the network agree on a consistent collection of state
     about the topology of the network, and in which no further control
     messages are needed to establish the consistency of the network
     topology.

  Convergence time

     The time which is required for a network to reach convergence
     after an event (typically, the movement of a mobile node) which
     changes the network topology.

  Laydown

     The relative physical location of the nodes within the ad hoc
     network.

  Pathloss matrix

     A matrix of coefficients describing the pathloss between any two
     nodes in an ad hoc network.  When the links are asymmetric, the
     matrix is also asymmetric.

  Scenario

     The tuple <laydown, pathloss matrix, mobility factor, traffic>
     characterizing a class of ad hoc networks.

6.  Security-related Terminology

  This section includes terminology commonly used around mobile and
  wireless networking.  Only a mobility-related subset of the entire
  security terminology is presented.

     Authorization-enabling extension

        An authentication which makes a (registration) message
        acceptable to the ultimate recipient of the registration
        message.  An authorization-enabling extension must contain an
        SPI (see below) [10].

     Mobility security association

        A collection of security contexts, between a pair of nodes,
        which may be applied to mobility-related protocol messages
        exchanged between them.  In Mobile IP, each context indicates



Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 27]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


        an authentication algorithm and mode, a secret (a shared key,
        or appropriate public/private key pair), and a style of replay
        protection in use.  Mobility security associations may be
        stored separately from the node's IPsec Security Policy
        Database (SPD) [10].

     Registration key

        A key used in the Mobility Security Association between a
        mobile node and a foreign agent.  A registration key is
        typically only used once or a very few times, and only for the
        purposes of verifying a small volume of Authentication data
        [12].

     Security context

        A security context between two nodes defines the manner in
        which two nodes choose to mutually authenticate each other, and
        indicates an authentication algorithm and mode.

     Security Parameter Index (SPI)

        An index identifying a security context between a pair of
        routers among the contexts available in the mobility security
        association.

  The Mobile IPv6 specification includes more security terminology
  related to MIPv6 bindings [9].  Terminology about the MIP
  challenge/response mechanism can be found in [11].

7.  Security Considerations

  This document presents only terminology.  There are no security
  issues in this document.

8.  Contributors

  This document was initially based on the work of Tapio Suihko, Phil
  Eardley, Dave Wisely, Robert Hancock, Nikos Georganopoulos, Markku
  Kojo, and Jukka Manner.

  Charles Perkins has provided input terminology related to ad-hoc
  networks.

  Thierry Ernst has provided the terminology for discussing mobile
  networks.





Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 28]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Henrik Levkowetz did a final check of the definitions in revision -05
  and suggested a number of changes.

9.  Acknowledgments

  This work has been partially performed in the framework of the IST
  project IST-2000-28584 MIND, which is partly funded by the European
  Union.  Some of the authors would like to acknowledge the help of
  their colleagues in preparing this document.

  Randy Presuhn did a very thorough and helpful review of the -02
  version of the terminology.

  Some definitions of terminology have been adapted from [1], [2], [3],
  [4], [7], [8], [9] and [10].

10.  Informative References

  [1]  Blair, D., Tweedly, A., Thomas, M., Trostle, J. and M. Ramalho,
       "Realtime Mobile IPv6 Framework", Work in Progress.

  [2]  Calhoun, P., Montenegro, G. and C. Perkins, "Mobile IP
       Regionalized Tunnel Management", Work in Progress.

  [3]  Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)
       Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998.

  [4]   Koodli, R., Ed., "Fast Handovers for Mobile IPv6", Work in
       Progress.

  [5]  Yavatkar, R., Pendarakis, D. and R. Guerin, "A Framework for
       Policy-based Admission Control", RFC 2753, January 2000.

  [6]  Kempf, J., McCann, P. and P. Roberts, "IP Mobility and the CDMA
       Radio Access Network:  Applicability Statement for Soft
       Handoff", Work in Progress.

  [7]  Kempf, J., Ed., "Problem Description:  Reasons For Performing
       Context Transfers Between Nodes in an IP Access Network", RFC
       3374, September 2002.

  [8]  Trossen, D., Krishnamurthi, G., Chaskar, H. and J. Kempf,
       "Issues in candidate access router discovery for seamless IP-
       level handoffs", Work in Progress.

  [9]  Johnson, D., Perkins, C. and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support in
       IPv6", RFC 3775, June 2004.




Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 29]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  [10] Perkins, C., Ed., "IP Mobility Support for IPv4", RFC 3344,
       August 2002.

  [11] Perkins, C., Calhoun, P. and J. Bharatia, "Mobile IPv4
       Challenge/Response Extensions (revised)", Work in Progress.

  [12] Perkins, C. and P. Calhoun, "AAA Registration Keys for Mobile
       IP", Work in Progress.

  [13] Ernst, T. and H. Lach, "Network Mobility Support Terminology",
       Work in Progress.

  [14] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", STD 54, RFC 2328, April 1998.






































Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 30]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


11.  Appendix A - Index of Terms

  AD ............................................................. 14
  AL ............................................................. 13
  AN ............................................................. 14
  ANG ............................................................ 14
  ANR ............................................................ 13
  AP ............................................................. 13
  AR ............................................................. 14
  Access Link .................................................... 13
  Access Network ................................................. 14
  Access Network Gateway ......................................... 14
  Access Network Router .......................................... 13
  Access Point ................................................... 13
  Access Router .................................................. 14
  Active state ................................................... 22
  Administrative Domain .......................................... 14
  Asymmetric link ................................................. 5
  Authorization-enabling extension ............................... 27
  BBM ............................................................ 19
  BU .............................................................. 3
  Bandwidth ....................................................... 2
  Bandwidth utilization ........................................... 2
  Beacon .......................................................... 3
  Binding Update .................................................. 3
  Break-before-make .............................................. 19
  CAR ............................................................ 15
  CAR ............................................................ 24
  Candidate AR ................................................... 24
  Candidate Access Router ........................................ 15
  Capability of an AR ............................................ 24
  Care-of-Address ................................................. 3
  Channel ......................................................... 3
  Channel access protocol ......................................... 3
  Channel capacity ................................................ 3
  Cluster ........................................................ 26
  Cluster head ................................................... 26
  Cluster member ................................................. 26
  CoA ............................................................. 3
  Context ........................................................ 24
  Context transfer ............................................... 24
  Control message ................................................. 4
  Convergence .................................................... 27
  Convergence time ............................................... 27
  Distance vector ................................................. 4
  Dormant state .................................................. 22
  Egress interface ............................................... 13
  Exposed terminal problem ....................................... 20



Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 31]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  FN ............................................................. 12
  Fairness ........................................................ 4
  Fast handover .................................................. 20
  Feature context ................................................ 24
  Fixed Node ..................................................... 12
  Flooding ........................................................ 4
  Foreign subnet prefix ........................................... 4
  Forwarding node ................................................. 4
  Global mobility ................................................ 25
  Goodput ........................................................ 20
  HA .............................................................. 5
  Handoff ........................................................ 15
  Handover ....................................................... 15
  Handover latency ............................................... 19
  Hidden-terminal problem ........................................ 20
  HoA ............................................................. 4
  Home Address .................................................... 4
  Home Agent ...................................................... 5
  Home subnet prefix .............................................. 5
  Horizontal Handover ............................................ 16
  Host mobility support .......................................... 25
  IP access address ............................................... 5
  IP diversity ................................................... 21
  Inactive state ................................................. 22
  Ingress interface .............................................. 12
  Inter-AN handover .............................................. 16
  Inter-technology handover ...................................... 16
  Interface ....................................................... 5
  Intra-AN handover .............................................. 16
  Intra-AR handover .............................................. 16
  Intra-technology handover ...................................... 16
  L2 Trigger ...................................................... 6
  Laydown ........................................................ 27
  Layer 2 handover ............................................... 16
  Link ............................................................ 5
  Link establishment .............................................. 6
  Link state ...................................................... 6
  Link-layer trigger .............................................. 6
  Link-level acknowledgment ....................................... 6
  Local broadcast ................................................. 6
  Local mobility ................................................. 25
  Local mobility management ...................................... 26
  Location updating .............................................. 23
  Loop-free ....................................................... 6
  MAC ............................................................. 7
  MBB ............................................................ 19
  MH ............................................................. 12
  MN ............................................................. 12



Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 32]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  MNN ............................................................ 13
  MPR ............................................................. 7
  MR ............................................................. 12
  Macro diversity ................................................ 21
  Macro mobility ................................................. 26
  Make-before-break .............................................. 19
  Medium Access Protocol .......................................... 7
  Micro diversity ................................................ 21
  Micro mobility ................................................. 26
  Mobile Host .................................................... 12
  Mobile Network Node ............................................ 13
  Mobile Node .................................................... 12
  Mobile Router .................................................. 12
  Mobile network ................................................. 12
  Mobile network prefix ........................................... 7
  Mobile-assisted handover ....................................... 18
  Mobile-controlled handover ..................................... 18
  Mobile-initiated handover ...................................... 17
  Mobility factor ................................................. 7
  Mobility security association .................................. 27
  Multipoint relay ................................................ 7
  NAR ............................................................ 14
  Neighbor ........................................................ 7
  Neighborhood .................................................... 7
  Network mobility support ....................................... 25
  Network-assisted handover ...................................... 18
  Network-controlled handover .................................... 18
  Network-initiated handover ..................................... 17
  New Access Router .............................................. 14
  Next hop ........................................................ 7
  PAR ............................................................ 15
  Paging ......................................................... 23
  Paging area .................................................... 23
  Paging area registrations ...................................... 23
  Paging channel ................................................. 23
  Pathloss ....................................................... 20
  Pathloss matrix ................................................ 27
  Payload ......................................................... 8
  Planned handover ............................................... 19
  Prefix .......................................................... 8
  Previous Access Router ......................................... 15
  Pull handover .................................................. 18
  Push handover .................................................. 18
  Radio Cell ..................................................... 13
  Registration key ............................................... 28
  Roaming ........................................................ 15
  Route activation ................................................ 8
  Route entry ..................................................... 8



Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 33]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


  Route establishment ............................................. 8
  Routing table ................................................... 8
  Routing proxy ................................................... 8
  Routing-related service ........................................ 24
  SAR ............................................................ 14
  SPI ............................................................ 28
  Scenario ....................................................... 27
  Seamless handover .............................................. 19
  Security Parameter Index ....................................... 28
  Security context ............................................... 28
  Serving Access Router .......................................... 14
  Shannon's Law ................................................... 9
  Signal strength ................................................. 9
  Smooth handover ................................................ 19
  Source route .................................................... 9
  Spatial re-use .................................................. 9
  Subnet .......................................................... 9
  System-wide broadcast ........................................... 9
  TAR ............................................................ 25
  Target AR ...................................................... 25
  Throughput ..................................................... 20
  Time-slotted dormant mode ...................................... 22
  Topology ........................................................ 9
  Traffic channel ................................................ 23
  Triggered update ................................................10
  Unassisted handover ............................................ 18
  Unplanned handover ............................................. 19
  Vertical handover .............................................. 17























Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 34]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


12.  Authors' Addresses

  Jukka Manner
  Department of Computer Science
  University of Helsinki
  P.O. Box 26 (Teollisuuskatu 23)
  FIN-00014 HELSINKI
  Finland

  Phone: +358-9-191-44210
  Fax:   +358-9-191-44441
  EMail: [email protected]


  Markku Kojo
  Department of Computer Science
  University of Helsinki
  P.O. Box 26 (Teollisuuskatu 23)
  FIN-00014 HELSINKI
  Finland

  Phone: +358-9-191-44179
  Fax:   +358-9-191-44441
  EMail: [email protected]



























Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 35]

RFC 3753              Mobility Related Terminology             June 2004


13.  Full Copyright Statement

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).  This document is subject
  to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
  except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.

  This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
  "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE
  REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE
  INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR
  IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
  THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
  WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

  The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
  Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed
  to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology
  described in this document or the extent to which any license
  under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it
  represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any
  such rights.  Information on the procedures with respect to
  rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

  Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
  assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
  attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use
  of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
  specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository
  at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

  The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention
  any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other
  proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required
  to implement this standard.  Please address the information to the
  IETF at [email protected].

Acknowledgement

  Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
  Internet Society.









Manner & Kojo                Informational                     [Page 36]