Network Working Group                                        M. Blanchet
Request for Comments: 3531                                      Viagenie
Category:Informational                                        April 2003


        A Flexible Method for Managing the Assignment of Bits
                       of an IPv6 Address Block

Status of this Memo

  This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
  not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
  memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

  This document proposes a method to manage the assignment of bits of
  an IPv6 address block or range.  When an organisation needs to make
  an address plan for its subnets or when an ISP needs to make an
  address plan for its customers, this method enables the organisation
  to postpone the final decision on the number of bits to partition in
  the address space they have.  It does it by keeping the bits around
  the borders of the partition to be free as long as possible.  This
  scheme is applicable to any bits addressing scheme using bits with
  partitions in the space, but its first intended use is for IPv6.  It
  is a generalization of RFC 1219 and can be used for IPv6 assignments.

Table of Contents

  1.  Rationale  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
  2.  Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
  3.  Description of the Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    3.1 Leftmost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    3.2 Rightmost  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    3.3 Centermost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
  4.  Example  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
  5.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
  6.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
      References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
      Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
      Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7






Blanchet                     Informational                      [Page 1]

RFC 3531        Bits Assignment of an IPv6 Address Block      April 2003


1. Rationale

  IPv6 addresses have a flexible structure for address assignments.
  This enables registries, internet service providers, network
  designers and others to assign address ranges to organizations and
  networks based on different criteria, like size of networks,
  estimated growth rate, etc.  Often, the initial assignment doesn't
  scale well because a small network becomes larger than expected,
  needing more addresses.  But then, the assignment authority cannot
  allocate contiguous addresses because they were already assigned to
  another network.

  RFC 1219 [1] describes an allocation scheme for IPv4 where address
  space is kept unallocated between the leftmost bits of the subnet
  part and the rightmost bits of the host part of the address.  This
  enables the network designer to change the subnet mask without
  renumbering, for the central bits not allocated.

  This work generalizes the previous scheme by extending the algorithm
  so it can be applied on any part of an IP address, which are assigned
  by any assignment authority level (registries, ISPs of any level,
  organizations, ...).  It can be used for both IPv4 and IPv6.

  This document does not provide any recommendation to registries on
  how to assign address ranges to their customers.

2. Scheme

  We define parts of the IP address as p1, p2 , p3, ...  pN in order,
  so that an IP address is composed of these parts contiguously.
  Boundaries between each part are based on the prefix assigned by the
  next level authority.  Part p1 is the leftmost part probably assigned
  to a registry, Part p2 can be allocated to a large internet service
  provider or to a national registry.  Part p3 can be allocated to a
  large customer or a smaller provider, etc.  Each part can be of
  different length.  We define l(pX) the length of part X.

  +------+------+------+------+------+------+
  | p1   | p2   | p3   | p4   | ...  | pN   |
  +------+------+------+------+------+------+
  <------- ipv6 or ipv4 address ------------>

  The algorithm for allocating addresses is as follows: a) for the
  leftmost part (p1), assign addresses using the leftmost bits first b)
  for the rightmost part (pN), assign addresses using the rightmost
  bits first c) for all other parts (center parts), predefine an
  arbitrary boundary (prefix) and then assign addresses using the
  center bits first of the part being assigned.



Blanchet                     Informational                      [Page 2]

RFC 3531        Bits Assignment of an IPv6 Address Block      April 2003


  This algorithm grows assigned bits in such way that it keeps
  unassigned bits near the boundary of the parts.  This means that the
  prefix between any two parts can be changed forward or backward,
  later on, up to the assigned bits.

3. Description of the Algorithm

  This section describes the assignment of leftmost bits, rightmost
  bits and centermost bits.

3.1 Leftmost

  p1 will be assigned in order as follows:

   Order   Assignment
   1 00000000
   2 10000000
   3 01000000
   4 11000000
   5 00100000
   6 10100000
   7 01100000
   8 11100000
   9 00010000
   ...

  This is actually a mirror of binary counting.

3.2 Rightmost

  pN (the last part) will be assigned in order as follows:

   Order   Assignment
   1 00000000
   2 00000001
   3 00000010
   4 00000011
   5 00000100
   6 00000101
   7 00000110
   8 00000111
   9 00001000
   ...








Blanchet                     Informational                      [Page 3]

RFC 3531        Bits Assignment of an IPv6 Address Block      April 2003


3.3 Centermost

  pX (where 1 < X < N) will be assigned in order as follows: (for
  example, with a 8 bit predefined length l(pX)=8))

   Order   Assignment
   1 00000000
   2 00001000
   3 00010000
   4 00011000
   5 00000100
   6 00001100
   7 00010100
   8 00011100
   9 00100000
   ...

  The bits are assigned using the following algorithm:

  1.  The first round is to select only the middle bit (and if there is
      an even number of bits  pick the bit following the center)

  2.  Create all combinations using the selected bits that haven't yet
      been created.

  3.  Start a new round by adding one more bit to the set.  In even
      rounds add the preceding bit to the set.  In odd rounds add the
      subsequent bit to the set.

  4.  Repeat 2 and 3 until there are no more bits to consider.

4. Example

  As an example, a provider P1 has been assigned the 3ffe:0b00/24
  prefix and wants to assign prefixes to its connected networks.  It
  anticipates in the foreseeable future a maximum of 256 customers
  consuming 8 bits.  One of these customers, named C2, anticipates a
  maximum of 1024 customer's assignments under it, consuming 10 other
  bits.












Blanchet                     Informational                      [Page 4]

RFC 3531        Bits Assignment of an IPv6 Address Block      April 2003


  The assignment will be as follows, not showing the first 24 leftmost
  bits (3ffe:0b00/24: 00111111 11111110 00001011):

  P1 assigns address space to its customers using leftmost bits:

   10000000  : assigned to C1
   01000000  : assigned to C2
   11000000  : assigned to C3
   00100000  : assigned to C4
   ...

  C2 assigns address space to its customers (C2C1, C2C2, ...) using
  centermost bits:

   0000010000 : assigned to C2C1
   0000100000 : assigned to C2C2
   0000110000 : assigned to C2C3
   ...

  Customers of C2 can use centermost bits for maximum flexibility and
  then the last aggregators (should be a network in a site) will be
  assigned using rightmost bits.

  Putting all bits together for C2C3:
  P1                        |C2      |C2C3
  00111111 11111110 00001011 01000000 00001100 00
                                <------->    <------>
                                    growing bits

  By using this method, P1 will be able to expand the number of
  customers and the customers will be able to modify their first
  assumptions about the size of their own customers, until the
  "reserved" bits are assigned.

5. Security Considerations

  Address assignment doesn't seem to have any specific security
  consideration.

6. Acknowledgements

  Thanks to Steve Deering, Bob Hinden, Thomas Narten, Erik Nordmark,
  Florent Parent and Jocelyn Picard for their very useful comments on
  this work.







Blanchet                     Informational                      [Page 5]

RFC 3531        Bits Assignment of an IPv6 Address Block      April 2003


References

  [1]  Tsuchiya, P., "On the assignment of subnet numbers", RFC 1219,
       April 1991.

  [2]  Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3", BCP
       9, RFC 2026, October 1996.

Author's Address

  Marc Blanchet
  Viagenie
  2875 boul. Laurier, bureau 300
  Sainte-Foy, QC  G1V 2M2
  Canada

  Phone: +1 418 656 9254
  EMail: [email protected]
  URI:   http://www.viagenie.qc.ca/
































Blanchet                     Informational                      [Page 6]

RFC 3531        Bits Assignment of an IPv6 Address Block      April 2003


Full Copyright Statement

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003).  All Rights Reserved.

  This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
  others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
  or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
  and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
  kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
  included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
  document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
  the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
  Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
  developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
  copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
  followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
  English.

  The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
  revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

  This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
  "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
  TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
  BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
  HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
  MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

  Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
  Internet Society.



















Blanchet                     Informational                      [Page 7]