Network Working Group                                        B. Haberman
Request for Comments: 3306                                    Consultant
Category: Standards Track                                      D. Thaler
                                                              Microsoft
                                                            August 2002


            Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast Addresses

Status of this Memo

  This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
  Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
  improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
  Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
  and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

  This specification defines an extension to the multicast addressing
  architecture of the IP Version 6 protocol.  The extension presented
  in this document allows for unicast-prefix-based allocation of
  multicast addresses.  By delegating multicast addresses at the same
  time as unicast prefixes, network operators will be able to identify
  their multicast addresses without needing to run an inter-domain
  allocation protocol.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction....................................................2
  2. Motivation......................................................2
  3. Terminology.....................................................2
  4. Multicast Address Format........................................2
  5. Address Lifetime................................................4
  6. Source-Specific Multicast Addresses.............................4
  7. Examples........................................................4
  8. Security Considerations.........................................5
  9. References......................................................5
  Author's Address...................................................6
  Full Copyright Statement...........................................7







Haberman & Thaler           Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 3306          Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast        August 2002


1. Introduction

  This document specifies an extension to the multicast portion of the
  IPv6 addressing architecture [ADDRARCH].  The current architecture
  does not contain any built-in support for dynamic address allocation.
  This proposal introduces encoded information in the multicast address
  to allow for dynamic allocation of IPv6 multicast addresses and IPv6
  source-specific multicast addresses.

2. Motivation

  The current IPv4 multicast address allocation architecture [RFC 2908]
  is based on a multi-layered, multi-protocol system.  The goal of this
  proposal is to reduce the number of protocols that need to be
  deployed in order to get dynamic multicast address allocation.

  The use of unicast prefix-based multicast address allocation will, at
  a minimum, remove the need to run the Multicast Address Allocation
  Protocol (AAP) [AAP WORK] and the Multicast Address-Set Claim (MASC)
  Protocol [RFC 2909].

3. Terminology

  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
  "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",  "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
  document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119].

4. Multicast Address Format

  Section 2.7 of [ADDRARCH] defines the following operational format of
  IPv6 multicast addresses:

     |    8   |  4 |  4 |                     112                     |
     +--------+----+----+---------------------------------------------+
     |11111111|flgs|scop|                  group ID                   |
     +--------+----+----+---------------------------------------------+















Haberman & Thaler           Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 3306          Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast        August 2002


  This document introduces a new format that incorporates unicast
  prefix information in the multicast address.  The following
  illustrates the new format:

     |   8    |  4 |  4 |   8    |    8   |       64       |    32    |
     +--------+----+----+--------+--------+----------------+----------+
     |11111111|flgs|scop|reserved|  plen  | network prefix | group ID |
     +--------+----+----+--------+--------+----------------+----------+

                                  +-+-+-+-+
  flgs is a set of 4 flags:       |0|0|P|T|
                                  +-+-+-+-+

        o  P = 0 indicates a multicast address that is not assigned
           based on the network prefix.  This indicates a multicast
           address as defined in [ADDRARCH].

        o  P = 1 indicates a multicast address that is assigned based
           on the network prefix.

        o  If P = 1, T MUST be set to 1, otherwise the setting of the T
           bit is defined in Section 2.7 of [ADDRARCH].

  The reserved field MUST be zero.

  plen indicates the actual number of bits in the network prefix field
  that identify the subnet when P = 1.

  network prefix identifies the network prefix of the unicast subnet
  owning the multicast address.  If P = 1, this field contains the
  unicast network prefix assigned to the domain owning, or allocating,
  the multicast address.  All non-significant bits of the network
  prefix field SHOULD be zero.

  It should be noted that the Interface Identifier requirements in
  Section 2.5.1 of [ADDRARCH] effectively restrict the length of the
  unicast prefix to 64 bits, hence the network prefix portion of the
  multicast address will be at most 64 bits.

  Group ID is set based on the guidelines outlined in [IPV6 GID].

  The scope of the unicast-prefix based multicast address MUST NOT
  exceed the scope of the unicast prefix embedded in the multicast
  address.







Haberman & Thaler           Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 3306          Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast        August 2002


5. Address Lifetime

  The lifetime of a unicast prefix-based multicast address SHOULD NOT
  exceed the Valid Lifetime field in the Prefix Information option,
  corresponding to the unicast prefix being used, contained in the
  Neighbor Discovery Router Advertisement message [RFC 2461].  The
  lifetime of the multicast address is needed to support the Abstract
  API for Multicast Address Allocation [RFC 2771].

  It should be noted that the unicast prefix's Valid Lifetime in the
  Router Advertisement message does not indicate that the prefix will
  become invalid at the end of the lifetime.  Rather, that value is
  typically a constant until a renumbering event is scheduled after
  which, the prefix does become invalid.

  The use of unicast prefix-based multicast addresses after the unicast
  prefix has become invalid may lead to operational problems.  For
  example, routers that perform policy checks comparing the multicast
  prefix against the unicast prefix assigned to an AS may discard the
  packet.

6. Source-Specific Multicast Addresses

  The unicast prefix-based IPv6 multicast address format supports
  Source-specific multicast addresses, as defined by [SSM ARCH].  To
  accomplish this, a node MUST:

        o  Set P = 1.
        o  Set plen = 0.
        o  Set network prefix = 0.

  These settings create an SSM range of FF3x::/32 (where 'x' is any
  valid scope value).  The source address field in the IPv6 header
  identifies the owner of the multicast address.

7. Examples

  The following are a few examples of the structure of unicast prefix-
  based multicast addresses.

        -  Global prefixes - A network with a unicast prefix of
           3FFE:FFFF:1::/48 would also have a unicast prefix-based
           multicast prefix of FF3x:0030:3FFE:FFFF:0001::/96 (where 'x'
           is any valid scope).

        -  SSM - All IPv6 SSM multicast addresses will have the format
           FF3x::/96.




Haberman & Thaler           Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 3306          Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast        August 2002


8. Security Considerations

  It is possible that the embedded unicast prefix can aid in
  identifying the allocation domain of a given multicast address,
  though an allocation domain choosing to avoid being traced has no
  obstacles currently to creating addresses using a prefix not assigned
  to it, or using a smaller scope embedded prefix.

  Using source-specific multicast addresses can sometimes aid in the
  prevention of denial-of-service attacks by arbitrary sources,
  although no guarantee is provided.  A more in-depth discussion of the
  security considerations for SSM can be found in [SSM ARCH].

9. References

  [RFC 2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
             3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.

  [RFC 2460] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
             (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998.

  [ADDRARCH] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
             Architecture", RFC 2373, July 1998.

  [RFC 2908] Thaler, D., Handley, M. and D. Estrin, "The Internet
             Multicast Address Allocation Architecture", RFC 2908,
             September 2000.

  [AAP WORK] Handley, M. and S. Hanna, "Multicast Address Allocation
             Protocol (AAP)", Work In Progress.

  [RFC 2909] Radoslavov, P., Estrin, D., Govindan, R., Handley, M.,
             Kumar, S. and D. Thaler, "The Multicast Address-Set Claim
             (MASC) Protocol", RFC 2909, September 2000.

  [RFC 2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
             Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1999.

  [IPV6 GID] Haberman, B., "Dynamic Allocation Guidelines for IPv6
             Multicast Addresses", RFC 3307, June 2002.

  [RFC 2461] Narten, T., Nordmark, E. and W. Simpson, "Neighbor
             Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 2461, December
             1998.

  [RFC 2771] Finlayson, R., "An Abstract API for Multicast Address
             Allocation", RFC 2771, February 2000.




Haberman & Thaler           Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 3306          Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast        August 2002


  [SSM ARCH] Holbrook, H. and B. Cain, "Source-Specific Multicast for
             IP", Work In Progress.

Author's Address

  Brian Haberman
  Consultant
  Phone: 1-919-949-4828
  EMail: [email protected]

  Dave Thaler
  Microsoft Corporation
  One Microsoft Way
  Redmond, WA  48105-6399
  Phone: 1-425-703-8835
  EMail: [email protected]



































Haberman & Thaler           Standards Track                     [Page 6]

RFC 3306          Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast        August 2002


Full Copyright Statement

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002).  All Rights Reserved.

  This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
  others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
  or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
  and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
  kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
  included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
  document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
  the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
  Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
  developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
  copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
  followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
  English.

  The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
  revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

  This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
  "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
  TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
  BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
  HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
  MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

  Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
  Internet Society.



















Haberman & Thaler           Standards Track                     [Page 7]