Network Working Group                                            J. Dunn
Request for Comments: 3134                                     C. Martin
Category: Informational                                        ANC, Inc.
                                                              June 2001


                 Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking

Status of this Memo

  This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
  not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
  memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

  This memo discusses and defines terms associated with performance
  benchmarking tests and the results of these tests in the context of
  Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) based switching devices supporting
  ABR (Available Bit Rate).  The terms defined in this memo will be
  used in addition to terms defined in RFCs 1242, 2285, and 2544 and
  2761.  This memo is a product of the Benchmarking Methodology Working
  Group (BMWG) of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).

1. Introduction

  This document provides terminology for benchmarking ATM based
  switching devices supporting ABR.  It extends terminology already
  defined for benchmarking network interconnect devices in RFC's 1242,
  2285, and 2544 and 2761.  Although some of the definitions in this
  memo may be applicable to a broader group of network interconnect
  devices, the primary focus of the terminology in this memo is on ATM
  ABR.

  This memo contains two major sections: Background and Definitions.
  The background section provides the reader with an overview of the
  technology and IETF formalisms.  The definitions section is split
  into two sub-sections.  The formal definitions sub-section is
  provided as a courtesy to the reader.  The measurement definitions
  sub-section contains performance metrics with inherent units.

  This document assumes that necessary services are available and
  active.  For example, IP connectivity requires SSCOP connectivity
  between signaling entities.  Further, it is assumed that the SUT has



Dunn & Martin                Informational                      [Page 1]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


  the ability to configure ATM addresses (via hard coded addresses,
  ILMI or PNNI neighbor discovery), has the ability to run SSCOP, and
  has the ability to perform signaled call setups (via UNI or PNNI
  signaling).  Finally, this document presents only the terminology
  associated with benchmarking IP performance over ATM; therefore, it
  does not represent a total compilation of ATM test terminology.

  The BMWG produces two major classes of documents: Benchmarking
  Terminology documents and Benchmarking Methodology documents.  The
  Terminology documents present the benchmarks and other related terms.
  The Methodology documents define the procedures required to collect
  the benchmarks cited in the corresponding Terminology documents.

2. Existing Definitions.

  RFC 1242, "Benchmarking Terminology for Network Interconnect
  Devices", should be consulted before attempting to make use of this
  document.  RFC 2544, "Benchmarking Methodology for Network
  Interconnect Devices", contains discussions of a number of terms
  relevant to the benchmarking of switching devices and should be
  consulted.  RFC 2285, "Benchmarking Terminology for LAN Switching
  Devices", contains a number of terms pertaining to traffic
  distributions and datagram interarrival.  RFC 2761, "Terminology for
  ATM Benchmarking", contains a number terms pertaining to traffic
  management [TM4.0, TM4.1].  Many of the metrics defined in RFC 2761
  (e.g., CDV, CER, CLR, CMR, and CTD) also apply to ABR performance
  benchmarking.  These metrics will not be redefined in this document.
  For the sake of clarity and continuity, this RFC adopts the template
  for definitions set out in Section 2 of RFC 1242.

II. Definitions

  The definitions presented in this section have been divided into two
  groups.  The first group is formal definitions, which are required in
  the definitions of the performance metrics but are not themselves
  strictly metrics.  These definitions are subsumed from other work
  done in other working groups both inside and outside the IETF.  They
  are provided as a courtesy to the reader.

1. Formal Definitions

1.1. Definition Format (from RFC 1242)

  Term to be defined.

  Definition: The specific definition for the term.





Dunn & Martin                Informational                      [Page 2]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


  Discussion: A brief discussion of the term, its application and any
  restrictions on measurement procedures.

  Specification: The working group and document in which the terms are
  specified and are listed in the references section.

1.2. Related Definitions.

1.2.1. Allowed Cell Rate (ACR)

  Definition: An ABR service parameter, ACR is the current rate
  (cells/second) at which a source is allowed to send.

  Discussion: For ABR traffic, ACR constitutes the actual data
  throughput for a particular VC.  The time change of this value
  effects TCP round trip time calculations, which in turn effects TCP
  throughput.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.2. ACR Decrease Time Factor (ADTF)

  Definition: This is the time permitted between sending RM-cells
  before the rate is decreased to ICR (Initial Cell Rate). The time
  units are .01 to 10.23 seconds with a granularity of 10 ms.

  Discussion: For ABR traffic, ADTF constitutes the time rate of the
  ACR.  This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which in
  turn effects TCP throughput.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.3. Additive Increase Rate (AIR)

  Definition: An ABR service parameter, AIR controls the rate at which
  the cell transmission rate increases.  It is signaled as AIRF, where

      AIRF = AIR*Nrm/PCR.

  Discussion: For ABR traffic, AIR effects the time rate of change of
  the ACR.  This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
  in turn effects TCP throughput.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.4. Additive Increase Rate Factor (AIRF)

  Definition: Refer to AIR.



Dunn & Martin                Informational                      [Page 3]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


  Discussion: Refer to AIR.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.5. Available Bit Rate (ABR)

  Definition: ABR is an ATM layer service category for which the
  limiting ATM layer transfer characteristics provided by the network
  may change subsequent to connection establishment.  A flow control
  mechanism is specified which supports several types of feedback to
  control the source rate in response to changing ATM layer transfer
  characteristics.

  Discussion: It is expected that an end-system that adapts its traffic
  in accordance with the feedback will experience a low cell loss ratio
  and obtain a fair share of the available bandwidth according to a
  network specific allocation policy.  Cell delay variation is not
  controlled in this service, although admitted cells are not delayed
  unnecessarily.

  Specification: AF-TM4.1

1.2.6. Available Bit Rate (ABR) Compliance (Conformance)

  Definition: ABR connection conformance refers to the behavior
  specified for ABR destination and switches, but allows for delays
  between the source and the UNI [UNI3.1, UNI4.0], which may perturb
  the traffic flow.

  Discussion: The cells on an ABR connection applies to CLP=0 cells,
  which are tested upon arrival.  At the arrival point, each cell is
  identified as conforming or non-conforming.  The minimal conformance
  definition for ABR is GCRA((1/PCR),t1), where PCR is defined for
  CLP=0 flow.

  Specification: AF-TM4.1

1.2.7. BN

  Definition: The BN bit in the RM-cell indicated whether the RM-cell
  is a BECN cell or not.

  Discussion: If BN=0, the RM cells were generated by the source.  If
  BN=1, the RM cells were generated by the destination or a switch.

  Specification: AF-TM4.1





Dunn & Martin                Informational                      [Page 4]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


1.2.8. CCR

  Definition: The CCR field in the RM-cell is set by the source to its
  current ACR.  CCR is formatted as a rate.

  Discussion: For BECN cells, CCR=0.

  Specification: AF-TM4.1

1.2.9. Cell Blocks (CB)

  Definition: Cell blocks are a sequence of N cells transmitted
  consecutively on a given connection.

  Discussion: A cell block will normally correspond to the number of
  information cells transmitted between successive OAM cells.

  Specification: AF-TM4.1

1.2.10. Congestion Indication (CI)

  Definition: The CI bit in the RM-cell allows a network element to
  indicate that there is congestion in the network.

  Discussion: When the source receives a backward RM-cell with CI=1,
  ACR is decreased.  When the destination turns around a forward RM-
  cell, the CI is set to 1 to indicate that the previously received
  data cell had the EFCI state set.

  Specification: AF-TM4.1

1.2.11. Cutoff Decrease Factor (CDF)

  Definition: CDF controls the decrease in ACR (Allowed Cell Rate)
  associated with CRM (missing RM cell count).

  Discussion: For ABR traffic, CDF effects the time rate of change of
  the ACR.  This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
  in turn effects TCP throughput.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0










Dunn & Martin                Informational                      [Page 5]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


1.2.12. DIR

  Definition: The DIR bit in the RM-cell indicates which direction of
  data flow is associated with the RM-cell.  DIR is changed from 0 to 1
  when an RM-cell is turned around at the destination.

  Discussion: A forward RM-cell is indicated by DIR=0 and is associated
  with data cells flowing in the same direction.  A backward RM-cell is
  indicated by DIR=1 and is associated with data cells flowing in the
  opposite direction.

  Specification: AF-TM4.1

1.2.13. Explicit Rate (ER)

  Definition: The ER field in the RM-cell is used to limit the source
  ACR to a specific value.  For each RM-cell, ER is set by the source
  to a requested rate (e.g., PCR).  It may be reduced by any network
  element in the path to a value that the element can sustain.  ER is
  formatted as a rate.

  Discussion: None.

  Specification: AF-TM4.1

1.2.14. Feedback

  Definition: Information carried in the backward RM-cells provided by
  the network elements and/or the destination back to the source.

  Discussion: Feedback may include information in the ER field, or the
  CI or NI bits of each backward RM-cell.

  Specification: AF-TM4.1

1.2.15. Ideal Transmission Time (ITT)

  Definition: The transmission time for ABR CLP=0 cells, if the
  difference between itself and the transmission time for the previous
  CLP=0 cell on the connection is greater than or equal to the minimum:
  a) the inverse of the ACR in effect immediately after the
  transmission time of the first of the two cells b) the inverse of the
  ACR in effect immediately before the transmission time of the second
  of the two cells.

  Discussion: The transmission time for the first cell on the
  connection is automatically an ITT.




Dunn & Martin                Informational                      [Page 6]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


  Specification: AF-TM4.1

1.2.16. Initial Cell Rate (ICR)

  Definition: An ABR service parameter, in cells/sec, that is the rate
  at which a source should send initially and after an idle period.

  Discussion: none.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.17. In-Rate Cells

  Definition: In-Rate ABR cells are sent with CLP=0.

  Discussion: ABR RM-cells shall be sent with CLP=0 except in certain
  circumstances, See Out-of-Rate Cells.  All other ABR cells shall be
  sent with CLP=0.

  Specification: AF-TM4.1

1.2.18. Minimum Cell Rate (MCR)

  Definition: An ABR service traffic descriptor, in cells/sec, that is
  the rate at which the source is always allowed to send.

  Discussion: MCR may be set to zero.  The bandwidth available from the
  network may vary, but shall not become less than MCR.

  Specification: AF-TM4.1

1.2.19. Mrm

  Definition: An ABR service parameter that controls allocation of
  bandwidth between forward W-cells, backward RM-cells, and data cells.

  Discussion: none.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.20. No Increase (NI)

  Definition: The NI bit in the RM-cell is used to prevent a source
  from increasing its ACR.  NI does not require any decrease in value.

  Discussion: None.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0



Dunn & Martin                Informational                      [Page 7]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


1.2.21. Nrm

  Definition: An ABR service parameter, Nrm is the maximum number of
  cells a source may send for each forward RM-cell.

  Discussion: none.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.22. Out-of-Rate Cells

  Definition: Out-of-Rate ABR cells are sent with CLP=1.

  Discussion: This may be used to enable a rate increase for a
  connection that has an ACR=0.  The source would generate out-of-rate
  cells to probe the network to learn when it may increase its rate.

  Specification: AF-TM4.1

1.2.23. Rate Decrease Factor (RDF)

  Definition: An ABR service parameter, RDF controls the decrease in
  the cell transmission rate.  RDF is a power of 2 from 1/32,768 to 1.

  Discussion: For ABR traffic, RDF effects the time rate of change of
  the ACR.  This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
  in turn effects TCP throughput.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.24. Rate Increase Factor (RIF)

  Definition: This controls the amount by which the cell transmission
  rate may increase upon receipt of a RM-cell.  The additive increase
  rate AIR=PCR*RIF.  RIF is a power of 2, ranging from 1/32,768 to 1.

  Discussion: For ABR traffic, RIF effects the time rate of change of
  the ACR.  This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
  in turn effects TCP throughput.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.25. Resource Management (RM) Cells

  Definition: RM cells are used to convey network status  (available
  bandwidth, congestion levels) and request peak cell rates for ATM
  blocks.  The RM cell has the following format:




Dunn & Martin                Informational                      [Page 8]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


  Header: 5 bytes, same as the ATM cell header Protocol ID: 3 bytes,
  protocol ID value is 1 for ABR service Function specific field: 45
  bytes, data required for the specific protocol (See DIR, BN, CI, NI,
  ER, CCR, and MCR for field information.)  Rsvd: 6 bytes, reserved for
  future specification EDC: 10 bytes, CRC-10 error detection code
  computed over the cell payload .ti6 (except the CRC-10 field) and
  used to check for data corruption

  Discussion: RM information can exist at the VP and/or VC level.  VP
  level cells are identified with a VCI value of 6.  VC level cells are
  identified with a PT of 6.  See DIR, BN, CI, NI, ER, CCR, and MCR for
  additional protocol field information.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.26. Severely Errored Cell Block (SECB)

  Definition: A severely cell block outcome occurs when more than M
  errored cells, lost cells, or misinserted cell outcomes are observed
  in a received cell block.

  Discussion: none.

  Specification: AF-TM4.1

1.2.27. Tagged Cell Rate (TCR)

  Definition: An ABR service parameter, TCR limits the rate at which a
  source may send out-of-rate forward RM-cells.  TCR is a constant
  fixed at 10 cells/second.

  Discussion: none.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.28. TDF

  Definition: An ABR service parameter, TDF controls the decrease in
  ACR associated with TOF.  TDF is signaled as TDFF, where TDF=TDFF/RDF
  times the smallest power of 2 greater or equal to PCR.  TDF is in
  units of 1/seconds.

  Discussion: For ABR traffic, TDF effects the time rate of change of
  the ACR.  This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
  in turn effects TCP throughput.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0




Dunn & Martin                Informational                      [Page 9]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


1.2.29. TDFF

  Definition: Refer to TDF.  TDFF is either zero or a power of two in
  the range 1/64 to 1 in units of 1 /cells.

  Discussion: Refer to TDF.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

  1.2.30. Time Out Factor (TOF)

  Definition: An ABR service parameter, TOF controls the maximum time
  permitted between sending forward RM-cells before a rate decrease is
  required.  It is signaled as TOFF where TOF=TOFF+1.  TOFF is a power
  of 2 in the range: 1/8 to 4,096.

  Discussion: For ABR traffic, TOF effects the time rate of change of
  the ACR.  This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
  in turn effects TCP throughput.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.31. Time Out Factor (TOFF)

  Definition: Refer to TOF.

  Discussion: none.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.32. Trm

  Definition: An ABR service parameter that provides an upper bound on
  the time between forward RM-cells for an active source.  It is 100
  times a power of two with a range of 100*2-7 to 100*20

  Discussion: For ABR traffic, Trm effects the time rate of change of
  the ACR.  This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
  in turn effects TCP throughput.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.33. Virtual Source/Virtual Destination (VSND)

  Definition: An ABR connection may be divided into two or more
  separately controlled ABR segments.  Each ABR control segment, except
  the first, is sourced by a virtual source.  A virtual source
  implements the behavior of an ABR source endpoint.  Backward RM-cells



Dunn & Martin                Informational                     [Page 10]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


  received by a virtual source are removed from the connection.  Each
  ABR control segment, except the last, is terminated by a virtual
  destination.  A virtual destination assumes the behavior of an ABR
  destination endpoint.  Forward RM-cells received by a virtual
  destination are turned around and not forwarded to the next segment
  of the connection.

  Discussion: none.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.34. Xrm Decrease Factor (XDM)

  Definition: An ABR service parameter, XDF controls the decrease in
  ACR associated with Xrm.  It is a power of two in range: [0, 1].

  Discussion: For ABR traffic, XDM effects the time rate of change of
  the ACR.  This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
  in turn effects TCP throughput.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

1.2.35. Xrm

  Definition: An ABR service parameter, Xrm limits the number of
  forward RM-cells which may be sent in the absence of received
  backward PM-cells.  The range is 0-255.

  Discussion: For ABR traffic, Xrm effects the time rate of change of
  the ACR.  This value effects TCP round trip time calculations, which
  in turn effects TCP throughput.

  Specification: AF-TM4.0

2. Performance Metrics

2.1. Definition Format (from RFC 1242)

  Metric to be defined.

  Definition: The specific definition for the metric.

  Discussion: A brief discussion of the metric, its application and any
  restrictions on measurement procedures.

  Measurement units: Intrinsic units used to quantify this metric.
  This includes subsidiary units; e.g., microseconds are acceptable if
  the intrinsic unit is seconds.



Dunn & Martin                Informational                     [Page 11]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


2.2. Definitions

2.2.1. ABR Rate Decrease Response Time (ARDRT)

  Definition: The amount of time required by the SUT to adjust its
  transmission rate based on an ABR rate decrease request.

  Discussion:  During the ARDRT, cells transmitted by the SUT may be
  dropped by the network due to traffic policing.  These dropped cells
  may contain a portion of an IP datagram.  This may cause IP and TCP
  packet loss.

  Measurement Units: seconds

2.2.2. ABR Rate Increase Response Time (ARIRT)

  Definition: The amount of time required by the SUT to adjust its
  transmission rate based on an ABR rate increase request.

  Discussion: During the ARIRT, the SUT will not fully utilize the
  available bandwidth.  This will negatively impact IP and TCP
  throughput.

  Measurement Units: seconds

2.2.3. RM-Cell Delay Variation (RM-CDV)

  Definition: The variation in RM-cell transfer delay (RM-CTD) of RM-
  cells associated with a given traffic load, orientation and
  distribution, as well as an integration period.  RM-CDV = max (RM-
  CTD) - min (RM-CTD) where max and min indicate the maximum and
  minimum over the integration period, respectively.

  Discussion:  RM-CDV is a component of RM-cell transfer delay, induced
  by buffering and RM-cell scheduling.

  RM-CDV effects the time required to notify the source of a change in
  the condition of the network.  This in turn effects TCP round trip
  time calculations. Large values of RM-CDV will adversely effect TCP
  throughput and cause SAR timeout.

  Measurement Units: seconds

2.2.4. RM-Cell Error Ratio (RM-CER)

  Definition: The ratio of RM-cells with payload errors in a
  transmission in relation to the total number of RM-cells sent in a
  transmission associated with a given traffic load, orientation and



Dunn & Martin                Informational                     [Page 12]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


  distribution, as well as an integration period. Note that errors
  occurring in the RM-cell header will cause RM-cell loss at the ATM
  layer. Note further that multiple errors in a payload will only be
  counted as one cell payload error.

    RM-CER = RM-Cells with payload errors / Total RM-Cells Transmitted.

  Discussion: The measurement is taken over a time interval and is
  desirable to be measured on an in-service circuit. RM-CER effects the
  time required to notify the source of a change in the condition of
  the network. This in turn effects TCP round trip time calculations.
  Large values of RM-CER will adversely effect TCP throughput and cause
  SAR timeout.

  Measurement Units: dimensionless.

2.2.5. RM-Cell Loss Ratio (RM-CLR)

  Definition: The ratio of lost RM-cells in a transmission in relation
  to the total RM-cells sent in a transmission associated with a given
  traffic load, orientation and distribution, as well as an integration
  period.

     RM-CLR = Lost RM-Cells / Total RM-Cells Transmitted.

  Discussion: The objective is to minimize RM-CLR.  It is expressed as
  an order of magnitude, having a range of 10^-1 to 10^-15 and
  unspecified.

  RM-CLR effects the time required to notify the source of a change in
  the condition of the network.  This in turn effects TCP round trip
  time calculations.  Large values of RM-CLR will adversely effect TCP
  throughput and cause SAR timeout.

  Measurement Units: dimensionless.

2.2.6. RM-Cell Misinsertion Ratio (RM-CMR)

  Definition: The ratio of RM-cells received at an endpoint that were
  not originally transmitted by the source end in relation to the total
  number of RM-cells properly transmitted associated with a given
  traffic load, orientation and distribution, as well as an integration
  period.

     RM-CMR = Misinserted RM-Cells / Total RM-Cells Transmitted.






Dunn & Martin                Informational                     [Page 13]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


  Discussion: The measurement is taken over a time interval and is
  desirable to be measured on an in-service circuit.

  RM-CMR effects the time required to notify the source of a change in
  the condition of the network.  This in turn effects TCP round trip
  time calculations.  Large values of RM-CMR will adversely effect TCP
  throughput and cause SAR timeout.

  Measurement Units: dimensionless.

2.2.7. RM-CRC Error Ratio

  Definition: The ratio of RM-cells received at an endpoint which
  contain an invalid CRC in relation to the total number of RM-cells
  properly transmitted associated with a given traffic load,
  orientation and distribution, as well as an integration period.

  Discussion: RM-CRC errors cause ATM RM-cells to be lost.

  RM-CRC effects the time required to notify the source of a change in
  the condition of the network.  This in turn effects TCP round trip
  time calculations.  Large values of RM-CRC will adversely effect TCP
  throughput and cause SAR timeout.

  Measurement Units: dimensionless

2.2.8. RM-Cell Transfer Delay (RM-CTD)

  Definition: The elapsed time between a RM-cell exit event at the
  measurement point 1 (e.g., at the source UNI) and the corresponding
  RM-cell entry event at a measurement point 2 (e.g., the destination
  UNI) for a particular connection.

  Discussion: The RM-cell transfer delay between two measurement points
  is the sum of the total inter-ATM node transmission delay and the
  total ATM node processing delay.  This number is a constant and
  should not adversely effect performance.

  Measurement units: seconds

2.2.9. Severely Errored Cell Block Ratio (SECBR)

  Definition: The ratio of severely errored cell blocks in a
  transmission in relation to the total cell blocks sent in a
  transmission associated with a given traffic load, orientation and
  distribution, as well as an integration period.

     SECBR = Severely Errored Cell Blocks/Total Transmitted Cell Blocks



Dunn & Martin                Informational                     [Page 14]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


  Discussion: SECBR may cause the SUT to drop cells that may contain a
  portion of an IP datagram.  This may cause IP and TCP packet loss.

  Measurement Units: dimensionless.

3. Security Considerations

  As this document is solely for providing terminology and describes
  neither a protocol nor an implementation, there are no security
  considerations associated with this document.

4. References

  [AF-TM4.0]  ATM Forum, Traffic Management Specification Version 4.0,
              af-tm-0056.00, April 1996.

  [AF-TM4.1]  ATM Forum, Traffic Management Specification Version 4.1,
              af-tm-0121.000, March 1999.

  [AF-UNI3.1] ATM Forum, User Network Interface Specification Version
              3.1, September 1994.

  [AF-UNI4.0] ATM Forum, User Network Interface Specification Version
              4.0, July 1996.

5. Editors' Addresses

  Jeffrey Dunn
  Advanced Network Consultants, Inc.
  4214 Crest Place
  Ellicott City, MD 21043 USA

  Phone: +1 (410) 750-1700
  EMail: [email protected]


  Cynthia Martin
  Advanced Network Consultants, Inc.
  4214 Crest Place
  Ellicott City, MD 21043 USA

  Phone: +1 (410) 750-1700
  EMail: [email protected]








Dunn & Martin                Informational                     [Page 15]

RFC 3134          Terminology for ATM ABR Benchmarking         June 2001


Full Copyright Statement

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001).  All Rights Reserved.

  This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
  others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
  or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
  and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
  kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
  included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
  document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
  the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
  Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
  developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
  copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
  followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
  English.

  The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
  revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

  This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
  "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
  TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
  BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
  HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
  MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

  Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
  Internet Society.



















Dunn & Martin                Informational                     [Page 16]