Network Working Group                                    C. Alaettinoglu
Request for Comments: 2754                                       USC/ISI
Category: Informational                                    C. Villamizar
                                                          Avici Systems
                                                            R. Govindan
                                                                USC/ISI
                                                           January 2000


                           RPS IANA Issues

Status of this Memo

  This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
  not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
  memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

  RPS Security [2] requires certain RPSL [1] objects in the IRR to be
  hierarchically delegated.  The set of objects that are at the root of
  this hierarchy needs to be created and digitally signed by IANA. This
  paper presents these seed objects and lists operations required from
  IANA.

  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
  "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
  document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.

1 Initial Seed

  A public key of IANA needs to be distributed with the software
  implementations of Distributed Routing Policy System [3].  An initial
  set of seed objects are needed to be signed with this key.  The
  following transaction (the transaction format is defined in [3])
  contains these objects and is signed by this key:











Alaettinoglu, et al.        Informational                       [Page 1]

RFC 2754                    RPS IANA Issues                 January 2000


  mntner:        mnt-iana
  descr:         iana's maintainer
  admin-c:       JKR1
  tech-c:        JKR1
  upd-to:        [email protected]
  mnt-nfy:       [email protected]
  auth:          pgpkey-7F6AA1B9
  mnt-by:        mnt-iana
  referral-by:   mnt-iana
  source:        IANA

  key-cert: pgpkey-7F6AA1B9
  method: pgp
  owner:  iana-root (est. Nov 98) <[email protected]>
  fingerpr: 71 09 2E 37 71 B8 0A 9C  3B 28 98 B4 F1 21 13 BB
  certif: # this is the real IANA key
  + -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
  + Version: 2.6.2
  +
  + mQCNAzZJ52sAAAEEAJ//C01YnlaGuXyrC16V7FphkRvBmcNU22TPOzrKnKjnWjH5
  + sJ5UQnGOpyhDc796gqBjY+lTLvPB9sFGJPWgxfNk2JQaxxLTD+tfqSsiURc/srpp
  + XohFAVR/fez8MOecISwvNpFh5VADuFuoNi7ZLuOwVTC4tM5RU0NJa8l/aqG5AAUR
  + tCdpYW5hLXJvb3QgKGVzdC4gTm92IDk4KSA8aWFuYUBpYW5hLm9yZz4=
  + =sF4q
  + -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
  mnt-by: mnt-iana
  source: IANA

  repository:         IANA
  repository-cert:    PGPKEY-88BAC849
  query-address:      http://www.iana.org
  response-auth-type: none
  submit-address:     http://www.iana.org
  submit-auth-type:   none
  expire:             0000 04:00:00
  heartbeat-interval: 0000 01:00:00
  admin-c:            JKR1
  tech-c:             JKR1
  mnt-by:             mnt-iana
  source:             IANA











Alaettinoglu, et al.        Informational                       [Page 2]

RFC 2754                    RPS IANA Issues                 January 2000


  as-block:     AS0 - AS65535
  descr:        as number space
  country:      us
  admin-c:      JKR1
  tech-c:       JKR1
  status:       UNALLOCATED
  source:       IANA
  mnt-by:       mnt-iana
  mnt-lower:    mnt-iana

  inetnum:      0.0.0.0 - 255.255.255.255
  netname:      Internet
  descr:        ip number space
  country:      us
  admin-c:      JKR1
  tech-c:       JKR1
  status:       UNALLOCATED
  source:       IANA
  mnt-by:       mnt-iana
  mnt-lower:    mnt-iana

  timestamp: 19991001 01:00:00 +00:00

  signature:
  + -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
  + Version: 2.6.2
  +
  + iQCVAwUBOAd3YENJa8l/aqG5AQFVdAP9Ho2TSLGXiDi6v1McsKY4obO32EtP44Jv
  + tpNWiRRz47WIpMBmzUrQajBDNNXzwq9r9mGC75Pg0MMwTDfvA47o6mnIGdT9XyZz
  + s9HlDGOqhklIjHOxXFDrBiz3u7eWEf3vmDCXt6UYg9lUtRKefkWtR5wD1Q1zDMSc
  + 7Ya7PE6X8SU=
  + =sAft
  + -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  The above text has no extra white space characters at the end of each
  line, and contains no tab characters.  All blank line sequences
  contain only a single blank line.  The page break in the text is also
  a single blank line.

  In this case, we assumed that IANA runs its own repository.  However
  this is not a requirement.  Instead, it may publish this transaction
  with an existing routing registry.

2 IANA Assignments

  Each time IANA makes an assignment, it needs to create inetnum and
  as-block objects as appropriate and digitally sign them using the key
  in its key-cert object.  For example:



Alaettinoglu, et al.        Informational                       [Page 3]

RFC 2754                    RPS IANA Issues                 January 2000


  as-block:     AS0 - AS500
  descr:        arin's space
  country:      us
  status:       ALLOCATED
  source:       iana
  delegated:    arin
  mnt-by:       mnt-iana

  inetnum:      128.0.0.0 - 128.255.255.255
  netname:      Internet portion
  descr:        ip number space
  country:      us
  status:       ALLOCATED
  source:       iana
  delegated:    arin
  mnt-by:       mnt-iana

3 Creating Routing Repositories

  To enable a new routing repository, a repository object, a maintainer
  object and a key-cert object need to be created and digitally signed
  by IANA. For example:

    mntner:        mnt-ripe
    descr:         RIPE's maintainer
    auth:          <ripe's choice>
    mnt-by:        mnt-ripe
    referral-by:   mnt-iana
    admin-c:       . . .
    tech-c:        . . .
    upd-to:        . . .
    mnt-nfy:       . . .
    source:        RIPE

    key-cert: pgpkey-979979
    method: pgp
    owner:  . . .
    fingerpr: . . .
    certif: # this key is for illustration only
    +       -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
    +       Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
    +
    +       . . .
    +       -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
    mnt-by: mnt-ripe
    source: RIPE





Alaettinoglu, et al.        Informational                       [Page 4]

RFC 2754                    RPS IANA Issues                 January 2000


    repository:         RIPE
    query-address:      whois://whois.ripe.net
    response-auth-type: PGPKEY-23F5CE35 # pointer to key-cert object
    response-auth-type: none
    remarks:            you can request rsa signature on queries
    remarks:            PGP required on submissions
    submit-address:     mailto://[email protected]
    submit-address:     rps-query://whois.ripe.net:43
    submit-auth-type:   pgp-key, crypt-pw, mail-from
    remarks:            these are the authentication types supported
    mnt-by:             maint-ripe-db
    expire:             0000 04:00:00
    heartbeat-interval: 0000 01:00:00
    ...
    remarks:            admin and technical contact, etc
    source:             RIPE

  This very first transaction of a new repository is placed in the new
  repository, not in the IANA repository.

4 Security Considerations

  Routing policy system security document [2] defines an hierarchical
  authorization model for objects stored in the routing registries.
  This document specifies the seed objects and the actions need to be
  taken by IANA to maintain the root of that authorization hierarchy.

5 IANA Considerations

  This whole document is for detailed consideration by IANA.

References

  [1] Alaettinoglu, C., Bates, T., Gerich, E., Karrenberg, D., Meyer,
      D., Terpstra, M. and C. Villamizar, "Routing Policy Specification
      Language (RPSL)", RFC 2622, June 1999.

  [2] Villamizar, C., Alaettinouglu, C., Meyer, D., Murphy, S. and C.
      Orange, "Routing Policy System Security", RFC 2725, December
      1999.

  [3] Villamizar, C., Alaettinouglu, C., Govindan, R. and D. Meyer,
      "Distributed Routing Policy System", Work in Progress.








Alaettinoglu, et al.        Informational                       [Page 5]

RFC 2754                    RPS IANA Issues                 January 2000


6 Authors' Addresses

  Cengiz Alaettinoglu
  USC Information Sciences Institute

  EMail: [email protected]


  Curtis Villamizar
  Avici Systems

  EMail: [email protected]


  Ramesh Govindan
  USC Information Sciences Institute

  EMail: [email protected]

7 Notices

  The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
  intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
  pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
  this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
  might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
  has made any effort to identify any such rights.  Information on the
  IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
  standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11.  Copies of
  claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
  licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
  obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
  proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
  be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.

  The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
  copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
  rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
  this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF Executive
  Director.











Alaettinoglu, et al.        Informational                       [Page 6]

RFC 2754                    RPS IANA Issues                 January 2000


8 Full Copyright Statement

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000).  All Rights Reserved.

  This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
  others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
  or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
  and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
  kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
  included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
  document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
  the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
  Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
  developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
  copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
  followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
  English.

  The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
  revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

  This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
  "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
  TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
  BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
  HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
  MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

  Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
  Internet Society.



















Alaettinoglu, et al.        Informational                       [Page 7]