Network Working Group                                           B. Leiba
Request for Comments: 2177               IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Category: Standards Track                                      June 1997


                          IMAP4 IDLE command

Status of this Memo

  This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
  Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
  improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
  Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
  and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

1.   Abstract

  The Internet Message Access Protocol [IMAP4] requires a client to
  poll the server for changes to the selected mailbox (new mail,
  deletions).  It's often more desirable to have the server transmit
  updates to the client in real time.  This allows a user to see new
  mail immediately.  It also helps some real-time applications based on
  IMAP, which might otherwise need to poll extremely often (such as
  every few seconds).  (While the spec actually does allow a server to
  push EXISTS responses aysynchronously, a client can't expect this
  behaviour and must poll.)

  This document specifies the syntax of an IDLE command, which will
  allow a client to tell the server that it's ready to accept such
  real-time updates.

2.   Conventions Used in this Document

  In examples, "C:" and "S:" indicate lines sent by the client and
  server respectively.

  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", and "MAY"
  in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2060
  [IMAP4].

3.   Specification

  IDLE Command

  Arguments:  none

  Responses:  continuation data will be requested; the client sends
              the continuation data "DONE" to end the command



Leiba                       Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 2177                   IMAP4 IDLE command                  June 1997



  Result:     OK - IDLE completed after client sent "DONE"
              NO - failure: the server will not allow the IDLE
                   command at this time
             BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid

  The IDLE command may be used with any IMAP4 server implementation
  that returns "IDLE" as one of the supported capabilities to the
  CAPABILITY command.  If the server does not advertise the IDLE
  capability, the client MUST NOT use the IDLE command and must poll
  for mailbox updates.  In particular, the client MUST continue to be
  able to accept unsolicited untagged responses to ANY command, as
  specified in the base IMAP specification.

  The IDLE command is sent from the client to the server when the
  client is ready to accept unsolicited mailbox update messages.  The
  server requests a response to the IDLE command using the continuation
  ("+") response.  The IDLE command remains active until the client
  responds to the continuation, and as long as an IDLE command is
  active, the server is now free to send untagged EXISTS, EXPUNGE, and
  other messages at any time.

  The IDLE command is terminated by the receipt of a "DONE"
  continuation from the client; such response satisfies the server's
  continuation request.  At that point, the server MAY send any
  remaining queued untagged responses and then MUST immediately send
  the tagged response to the IDLE command and prepare to process other
  commands. As in the base specification, the processing of any new
  command may cause the sending of unsolicited untagged responses,
  subject to the ambiguity limitations.  The client MUST NOT send a
  command while the server is waiting for the DONE, since the server
  will not be able to distinguish a command from a continuation.

  The server MAY consider a client inactive if it has an IDLE command
  running, and if such a server has an inactivity timeout it MAY log
  the client off implicitly at the end of its timeout period.  Because
  of that, clients using IDLE are advised to terminate the IDLE and
  re-issue it at least every 29 minutes to avoid being logged off.
  This still allows a client to receive immediate mailbox updates even
  though it need only "poll" at half hour intervals.











Leiba                       Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 2177                   IMAP4 IDLE command                  June 1997


  Example:    C: A001 SELECT INBOX
              S: * FLAGS (Deleted Seen)
              S: * 3 EXISTS
              S: * 0 RECENT
              S: * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1]
              S: A001 OK SELECT completed
              C: A002 IDLE
              S: + idling
              ...time passes; new mail arrives...
              S: * 4 EXISTS
              C: DONE
              S: A002 OK IDLE terminated
              ...another client expunges message 2 now...
              C: A003 FETCH 4 ALL
              S: * 4 FETCH (...)
              S: A003 OK FETCH completed
              C: A004 IDLE
              S: * 2 EXPUNGE
              S: * 3 EXISTS
              S: + idling
              ...time passes; another client expunges message 3...
              S: * 3 EXPUNGE
              S: * 2 EXISTS
              ...time passes; new mail arrives...
              S: * 3 EXISTS
              C: DONE
              S: A004 OK IDLE terminated
              C: A005 FETCH 3 ALL
              S: * 3 FETCH (...)
              S: A005 OK FETCH completed
              C: A006 IDLE

4.   Formal Syntax

  The following syntax specification uses the augmented Backus-Naur
  Form (BNF) notation as specified in [RFC-822] as modified by [IMAP4].
  Non-terminals referenced but not defined below are as defined by
  [IMAP4].

  command_auth    ::= append / create / delete / examine / list / lsub /
                      rename / select / status / subscribe / unsubscribe
                      / idle
                      ;; Valid only in Authenticated or Selected state

  idle            ::= "IDLE" CRLF "DONE"






Leiba                       Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 2177                   IMAP4 IDLE command                  June 1997


5.   References

  [IMAP4] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol - Version
  4rev1", RFC 2060, December 1996.

6.   Security Considerations

  There are no known security issues with this extension.

7.   Author's Address

  Barry Leiba
  IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
  30 Saw Mill River Road
  Hawthorne, NY  10532

  Email: [email protected]


































Leiba                       Standards Track                     [Page 4]