Network Working Group                                        Y. Pouffary
Request For Comments: 1859                 Digital Equipment Corporation
Category: Informational                                     October 1995


   ISO Transport Class 2 Non-use of Explicit Flow Control over TCP
                          RFC1006 extension

Status of this Memo

  This memo provides information for the Internet community.  This memo
  does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of
  this memo is unlimited.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction - General recommendations.......................2
  2. The protocol.................................................3
  2.1 TCP service as a Network Service - The Primitives...........3
  2.2 Connection Establishment....................................4
  2.3 Data Transfer...............................................5
  2.4 Connection Release..........................................6
  3. Packet Format................................................6
  4. DIGITAL DECnet over TCP/IP...................................8
  Acknowledgements................................................9
  References......................................................9
  Author's Address................................................9

1. Introduction - General recommendations

  This document is an extension to STD35, RFC1006, a standard for the
  Internet community. The document does not duplicate the protocol
  definitions contained in RFC1006 and in International Standard ISO
  8073.  It supplements that information with the description of how to
  implement ISO Transport Class 2 Non-use of Explicit Flow Control on
  top of TCP.

  The document should be used in conjunction with the RFC1006 and ISO
  8073.

  The RFC1006 standard defines how to implement ISO 8073 Transport
  Class 0 on top of TCP. This memo defines how to implement ISO 8073
  Transport Class 2 Non-use of Explicit Flow Control on top of TCP.
  Like ISO Transport Class 0, Class 2 Non-use of Explicit Flow Control
  provides basic connection with minimal overhead.

  A Transport protocol class is selected for a particular Transport
  connection based upon the characteristics of the lower layers and the



Pouffary                     Informational                      [Page 1]

RFC 1859            ISO Transport and Flow Control          October 1995


  requirements of the upper layer. Use of class 2 Non-use of Explicit
  Flow Control is suitable when the use of separate virtual data
  channels for normal and expedited Data are desirable or when an
  explicit disconnection of the Transport connection is desirable.

  Hosts which choose to implement this extension are expected to listen
  on the well-known TCP port number 399.

  It is recommended that the well-known RFC1006 TCP port 102 not be
  used. This recommendation is done to minimise impact to an existing
  RFC1006 implementation.

  The memo also describes the use of this extension within the DIGITAL
  Network Architecture (DNA).

2. The protocol

  The protocol specified by this memo is fundamentally equivalent to
  the protocol ISO 8073 Transport Class 2 Non-use of Explicit Flow
  Control, with the following extensions:

  - Expedited Data service is supported.

  - Splitting and Recombining may be used for Expedited Data
    transmission.

  - The Network Service used is provided by TCP.

  The ISO 8073 Transport protocol Class 2 allows Multiplexing. It is
  recommended that this capability not be use for performance reasons.

  The ISO 8073 Transport protocol exchanges information between peers
  in discrete units of information called transport protocol data units
  (TPDUs).  The protocol defined in this memo encapsulates these TPDUs
  in discrete units called TPKTs.  The structure of these TPKTs and
  their relationship to TPDUs are discussed in the next sections.

2.1 TCP service as a Network Service - The Primitives

  The mapping between the TCP service primitives and the service
  primitives expected by ISO 8073 Transport when operation over
  Connection-oriented network service is straightforward.









Pouffary                     Informational                      [Page 2]

RFC 1859            ISO Transport and Flow Control          October 1995


  Note: The following description of the mapping is a repeat from the
  RFC1006 standard.

  network service                 TCP
  ---------------                 ---
  CONNECTION ESTABLISHMENT

          N-CONNECT.REQUEST       open completes

          N-CONNECT.INDICATION    listen (PASSIVE open) finishes

          N-CONNECT.RESPONSE      listen completes

          N-CONNECT.CONFIRMATION  open (ACTIVE open) finishes

  DATA TRANSFER

          N-DATA.REQUEST          send data

          N-DATA.INDICATION       data ready followed by read data

  CONNECTION RELEASE

          N-DISCONNECT.REQUEST    close

          N-DISCONNECT.INDICATION connection closes or errors

  Mapping parameters between the TCP service and the network service is
  also straightforward:

  network service                 TCP
  ---------------                 ---
  CONNECTION ESTABLISHMENT

          Called address          server's IP address (4 octets)

          Calling address         client's IP address (4 octets)

          all others              ignored

  DATA TRANSFER

          NS-user data (NSDU)     data

  CONNECTION RELEASE

          all parameters          ignored




Pouffary                     Informational                      [Page 3]

RFC 1859            ISO Transport and Flow Control          October 1995


2.2 Connection Establishment

  The principles used in connection establishment are based upon those
  described in ISO 8073, with the following extensions.

  - Connection Request and Connection Confirmation TPDUs may negotiate
    the use of Expedited Data transfer using the negotiation mechanism
    specified in ISO 8073.

  - Connection Request and Connection Confirmation TPDUs must not
    negotiate the Use of Explicit Flow Control.

  To perform an N-CONNECT.REQUEST action, the TS-peer performs an
  active open to the desired IP address using the well know TCP port
  399.  When the TCP signals either success or failure, this results in
  an N-CONNECT.INDICATION action.

  To await an N-CONNECT.INDICATION event, a server listens on the well
  know TCP port 399.  When a client successfully connects to this port,
  the event occurs and an implicit N-CONNECT.RESPONSE action is
  performed.

2.3 Data Transfer

  The elements of procedure used during transfer are based upon those
  presented in ISO 8073, with the two following extensions.

  - Expedited Data may be supported (if negotiated during connection
    establishment).

    In Non-Use of Explicit Flow Control Expedited Data requires no
    Expedited Data Acknowledgement.

  - Splitting and Recombining may be used for Expedited Data
    transmission.

    The procedure of Splitting and Recombining allows a transport
    connection to make use of multiple TCP connections.
    TCP connections created for Splitting purposes should also use
    the primitives described in 2.1.

    It is recommended to only create a second TCP connection for
    Expedited Data when transmission of Expedited Data is requested.

    Expedited Data must only be sent over an outgoing TCP connection.
    This second TCP connection must not be shared among transport
    connections and must remain established until the transport
    connection is terminated, at which time it must be closed.



Pouffary                     Informational                      [Page 4]

RFC 1859            ISO Transport and Flow Control          October 1995


  Implementors note: The procedure of Splitting and Recombining for
  Expedited Data transmission guaranties that a congested Normal Data
  TCP connection cannot block an Expedited Data TCP connection. It also
  ensures independence of the Normal Data TCP connection from the
  Expedited Data TCP connection.

  To perform an N-DATA.REQUEST action, the TS-peer constructs the
  desired TPKT and uses the TCP send data primitive.

  To trigger an N-DATA.INDICATION action, the TCP indicates that data
  is ready and a TPKT is read using the TCP read data primitive.

2.4 Connection Release

  The elements of procedure used during a connection release are
  identical to those presented in ISO 8073.

  A connection can be terminated by the user in one of two ways:

  - Abort Disconnect specifies that all messages at the source are not
    required to be sent to the destination before the connection is
    disconnected.

  - Synchronous Disconnect specifies that all messages at the source
    must be sent to the destination, and that all messages at the
    destination must be delivered, before the connection is
    disconnected.

  Disconnect Request and Disconnect Confirmation TPDUs are exchanged in
  both cases. The Disconnect Request TPDU carries a code indicating the
  reason for the disconnection.

  In the case of a Synchronous Disconnect the Disconnect Request reason
  code is normal (80 hex). For an Abort Disconnect the Disconnect
  Request reason code is normal with additional information parameter
  value set to (c0 hex).

  Upon receipt of a Disconnect Confirmation TPDU a N-DISCONNECT.REQUEST
  action is performed to close the TCP connection.

  If the TCP connection fails for some other reason, this generates an
  N-DISCONNECT.INDICATION event.

3. Packet Format

  A fundamental difference between TCP and the network service expected
  by ISO transport is that TCP manages a continuous stream of octets,
  with no explicit boundaries.



Pouffary                     Informational                      [Page 5]

RFC 1859            ISO Transport and Flow Control          October 1995


  The protocol described in RFC1006 uses a simple packetization scheme
  in order to delimit TPDUs. Each packet, termed a TPKT, consists of
  two parts: a packet-header and a TPDU.

  We use the same scheme described in RFC1006 for this extension.
  There is no need to change the version number. The ISO transport TPDU
  sufficiently describes the transport protocol class being used.

  The format of the packet-header described below is a repeat from
  RFC1006.

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |      vrsn     |    reserved   |          packet length        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

        where:

        vrsn                         8 bits

        This field is always 3 for the version of the protocol
        described in this memo.

        packet length                16 bits (min=7, max=65535)

        The packet length is the length of the entire packet in
        octets, including packet-header.

  The format of the ISO transport TPDU is defined in ISO 8073.

4. DIGITAL DECnet over TCP/IP

  DECnet over TCP/IP is implemented using the DECnet Session Control
  layer over this RFC1006 extension protocol.

  The informational RFC defined in this document provides the Transport
  Service functionality required by DECnet Applications while operating
  over TCP/IP.

  The next paragraph is a brief summary of the role of the DECnet
  Session Control Layer. For further details, refer to the DIGITAL DNA
  Session Control Layer Specification.

  The DECnet Session Control Layer makes a Transport Service available
  to End Users of a network. This layer is concerned with system-
  dependent functions related to creating, maintaining, and destroying
  Transport Connections.  Separate virtual data channels, known  as



Pouffary                     Informational                      [Page 6]

RFC 1859            ISO Transport and Flow Control          October 1995


  "Normal"  and  "Expedited",  are provided to End Users. DECnet
  Session Control must be guaranteed independence of these channels by
  the Transport Layer. Expedited Data transmission cannot be blocked by
  a congested normal data channel. DECnet Session Control requires that
  all data in transit be delivered before initiating the release of the
  Transport Connection.

  DECnet, DNA, and the DIGITAL logo are trademarks of Digital Equipment
  Corporation.

Acknowledgements

  Bill Duane, Jim Bound, David Sullivan, Mike Dyer, Matt Thomas, Dan
  Harrington and many other members of the DECnet engineering team.

References

  [ISO8072]  ISO. "International Standard 8072.  Information
             Processing Systems -- Open Systems Interconnection:
             Transport Service Definition."

  [ISO8073]  ISO. "International Standard 8073.  Information
             Processing Systems -- Open Systems Interconnection:
             Transport Protocol Specification."

  [ISO8327]  ISO. "International Standard 8327.  Information
             Processing Systems -- Open Systems Interconnection:
             Session Protocol Specification."

  [RFC791]   Postel, J., "Internet Protocol - DARPA Internet Program
             Protocol Specification", STD 5, RFC 791,
             USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.

  [RFC793]   Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol - DARPA
             Internet Program Protocol Specification", STD 7, RFC
             793, USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.

  [RFC1006]  Rose, M., and D. Cass, "ISO Transport Services on Top of
             the TCP - Version: 3", STD 35, RFC 1006, Northrop
             Research and Technology Center, May 1987.











Pouffary                     Informational                      [Page 7]

RFC 1859            ISO Transport and Flow Control          October 1995


Security Considerations

  Security issues are not discussed in this memo.

Author's Address

  Yanick Pouffary
  End Systems Networking
  Digital Equipment Corporation
  Centre Technique (Europe)
  B.P. 027
  950 Routes des colles
  06901 Sophia antipolis, France

  Phone: +33 92-95-62-85
  Fax:   +33 92-95-62-32
  EMail: [email protected]


































Pouffary                     Informational                      [Page 8]