Network Working Group                                          A. Durand
Request For Comments: 1846                                          IMAG
Category: Experimental                                         F. Dupont
                                                     INRIA Rocquencourt
                                                         September 1995


                         SMTP 521 Reply Code


Status of this Memo

  This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
  community.  This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any
  kind.  Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

  This memo defines a new Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) [1]
  reply code, 521, which one may use to indicate that an Internet host
  does not accept incoming mail.

1. Motivations

  Hosts on the Internet have shifted from large, general-purpose hosts
  to smaller, more specialized hosts.  There is an increasing number of
  hosts which are dedicated to specific tasks, such as serving NTP or
  DNS.  These dedicated hosts frequently do not provide mail service.

  Usually, these mailless hosts do not run an SMTP server.
  Unfortunately, users will occasionally misaddress mail to these
  hosts.  Regular SMTP clients attempting to deliver this misaddressed
  mail must treat the lack of an SMTP server on the host as a temporary
  error.  They must queue the mail for later delivery, should an SMTP
  server be started at a later time.

  This causes the mail to remain queued for days, until it is returned
  with what is usually a confusing error message.

2. Two  complementary solutions

  Two complementary solutions MAY be implemented to deal with this
  issue.  The first one is to use MX relays to bounce misaddressed
  mails.  The second one is to implement a  minimal smtp server on the
  mailless host to bounce all mails.

  The choice between the two solutions is site dependent.



Durand & Dupont               Experimental                      [Page 1]

RFC 1846                  SMTP 521 Reply Code             September 1995


3. The MX relays solution

  MX relays may be used to indicate SMTP clients that an Internet host
  does not accept mail.

  During the SMTP dialog, these MX relays MAY bounce any message
  destinated to this particular host with an SMTP 521 reply code.


  SMTP dialog example:

  ---> 220 relay.imag.fr ready
  <--- HELO client.inria.fr
  ---> 250 relay.imag.fr Hello client.inria.fr
  <--- MAIL FROM: <[email protected]>
  ---> 250 <[email protected]>... Sender Ok
  <--- RCPT TO: <[email protected]>
  ---> 521 nomail.imag.fr does not accept mail
  <--- QUIT
  ---> 221 relay.imag.fr closing connection

  If an MX relay of precedence n for a mailless host bounces mails on
  its behalf, then any other MX relay of precedence lower than n for
  this mailless host SHOULD do the same.

4. The SMTP server solution

4.1 521 greeting

  A host may indicate that it does not accept mail by sending an
  initial 521 "Host does not accept mail" reply to an incoming SMTP
  connection.  The official name of the server host or its IP address
  MUST be sent as the first word following the reply code.

  For example: 521 canon.inria.fr does not accept mail

4.2 SMTP dialog

  After issuing the initial 521 reply, the server host MUST do one of
  the following two options:

  a) Close the SMTP connection.
  b) Read commands, issuing 521 replies to all commands except QUIT.
     If the SMTP client does not issue the QUIT command after a
     reasonable time, the SMTP server MUST time out and close the
     connection.  A suggested time-out value is 5 minutes.





Durand & Dupont               Experimental                      [Page 2]

RFC 1846                  SMTP 521 Reply Code             September 1995


  DISCUSSION:

  When an SMTP server closes the connection immediatly after issuing
  the initial 521 reply, some existing SMTP clients treat the
  condition as a transient error and requeue the mail for later
  delivery.  If the SMTP server leaves the connection open, those
  clients immediately send the QUIT command and return the mail.

4.3 MX

  A host which sends a 521 greeting message MUST NOT be listed as an MX
  record for any domain.

4.4 Postmaster

  An SMTP server which sends a 521 greeting message IS NOT subject to
  the postmaster requirement of STD 3, RFC 1123 ([2]).

  DISCUSSION:

  Postmaster exists so you can report mail errors.  A host that doesn't
  support mail doesn't need a Postmaster.

5. SMTP client behavior

  If an SMTP client encounters a host in an MX record that issues a 521
  greeting message, it must do one of the following two options:

  a) Attempt to deliver it to a different MX host for that domain.
  b) Return the mail with an appropriate non-delivery report.

  If an SMTP client encounters a 521 reply code in any other part of
  the SMTP dialog, it MUST return the mail with an appropriate non-
  delivery report.

6. Security Considerations

  Not running any SMTP server, or running an SMTP server which simply
  emits fixed strings in response to incoming connection should provide
  significantly fewer opportunities for security problems than running
  a complete SMTP implementation.










Durand & Dupont               Experimental                      [Page 3]

RFC 1846                  SMTP 521 Reply Code             September 1995


7. Authors' Addresses

  Alain Durand
  Institut de Mathematiques Appliquees de Grenoble (IMAG)
  BP 53 38041 Grenoble CEDEX 9 France

  Phone : +33 76 63 57 03
  Fax   : +33 76 44 66 75
  EMail: [email protected]


  Francis Dupont
  Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique
  B.P. 105 / 78153 Le Chesnay CEDEX France

  Phone : +33 1 39 63 52 13
  Fax   : +33 1 39 63 53 30
  EMail: [email protected]

8. Expericences

  People implementing this reply code are suggested to send a message
  to [email protected] to report their experience.

9. References

  [1] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", STD 10, RFC 821,
      USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1982.

  [2] Braden, R., Editor, "Requirements for Internet Hosts -
      Application and Support", STD 3, RFC 1123, USC/Information
      Sciences Institute, October 1989.



















Durand & Dupont               Experimental                      [Page 4]