Network Working Group                                         W. Simpson
Request for Comments: 1619                                    Daydreamer
Category: Standards Track                                       May 1994


                          PPP over SONET/SDH



Status of this Memo

  This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
  Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
  improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
  Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
  and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.



Abstract

  The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) [1] provides a standard method for
  transporting multi-protocol datagrams over point-to-point links.
  This document describes the use of PPP over Synchronous Optical
  Network (SONET) and Synchronous Digital Heirarchy (SDH) circuits.

  This document is the product of the Point-to-Point Protocol Working
  Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).  Comments should
  be submitted to the [email protected] mailing list.



Applicability

  This specification is intended for those implementations which desire
  to use the PPP encapsulation over high speed private point-to-point
  links, such as intra-campus single-mode fiber which may already be
  installed and unused.  Because the PPP encapsulation has relatively
  low overhead, it is anticipated that significantly higher throughput
  can be attained compared to other SONET/SDH payload mappings, at a
  significantly lower cost for line termination equipment.










Simpson                                                         [Page i]
RFC 1619                   PPP over SONET/SDH                   May 1994


                          Table of Contents


    1.     Introduction ..........................................    1

    2.     Physical Layer Requirements ...........................    1

    3.     Framing ...............................................    2

    4.     Configuration Details .................................    3

    SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS ......................................    3

    REFERENCES ...................................................    3

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................    3

    CHAIR'S ADDRESS ..............................................    4

    AUTHOR'S ADDRESS .............................................    4






























Simpson                                                        [Page ii]
RFC 1619                   PPP over SONET/SDH                   May 1994


1.  Introduction

  PPP was designed as a standard method of communicating over point-
  to-point links.  Initial deployment has been over short local lines,
  leased lines, and plain-old-telephone-service (POTS) using modems.
  As new packet services and higher speed lines are introduced, PPP is
  easily deployed in these environments as well.

  This specification is primarily concerned with the use of the PPP
  encapsulation over SONET/SDH links.  Since SONET/SDH is by definition
  a point-to-point circuit, PPP is well suited to use over these links.

  The Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) [3] is an octet-synchronous
  multiplex scheme that defines a family of standard rates and formats.
  Despite the name, it is not limited to optical links.  Electrical
  specifications have been defined for single-mode fiber, multi-mode
  fiber, and CATV 75 ohm coaxial cable.  The transmission rates are
  integral multiples of 51.840 Mbps, which may be used to carry T3/E3
  bit-synchronous signals.  The allowed multiples are currently
  specified as

          STS-1    51.840         STS-18    933.120
          STS-3   155.520         STS-24  1,244.160
          STS-9   466.560         STS-36  1,866.240
          STS-12  622.080         STS-48  2,488.320


  The CCITT Synchronous Digital Heirarchy (SDH) defines a subset of
  SONET transmission rates beginning at 155.520 Mbps [5].

          SONET           SDH equivalent
          STS-3c          STM-1
          STS-12c         STM-4
          STS-48c         STM-16




2.  Physical Layer Requirements

  PPP treats SONET/SDH transport as octet oriented synchronous links.
  SONET/SDH links are full-duplex by definition.

  Interface Format

     PPP presents an octet interface to the physical layer.  There is
     no provision for sub-octets to be supplied or accepted.




Simpson                                                         [Page 1]
RFC 1619                   PPP over SONET/SDH                   May 1994


     The octet stream is mapped into the SONET/SDH Synchronous Payload
     Envelope (SPE), with the octet boundaries aligned with the SPE
     octet boundaries.

     No scrambling is needed during insertion into the SPE.

     The Path Signal Label (C2) is intended to indicate the contents of
     the SPE.  The experimental value of 207 (cf hex) is used to
     indicate PPP.

     The Multiframe Indicator (H4) is currently unused, and MUST be
     zero.

  Transmission Rate

     The basic rate for PPP over SONET/SDH is that of STS-3c/STM-1 at
     155.520 Mbps.  The available information bandwidth is 149.760
     Mbps, which is the STS-3c/STM-1 SPE with section, line and path
     overhead removed.  This is the same super-rate mapping that is
     used for ATM and FDDI [4].

     Lower signal rates MUST use the Virtual Tributary (VT) mechanism
     of SONET/SDH.  This maps existing signals up to T3/E3 rates
     asynchronously into the SPE, or uses available clocks for bit-
     synchronous and byte-synchronous mapping.

     Higher signal rates SHOULD conform to the SDH STM series, rather
     than the SONET STS series, as equipment becomes available.  The
     STM series progresses in powers of 4 (instead of 3), and employs
     fewer steps, which is likely to simplify multiplexing and
     integration.

  Control Signals

     PPP does not require the use of control signals.  When available,
     using such signals can allow greater functionality and
     performance.  Implications are discussed in [2].



3.  Framing

  The framing for octet-synchronous links is described in "PPP in HDLC
  Framing" [2].

  The PPP frames are located by row within the SPE payload.  Because
  frames are variable in length, the frames are allowed to cross SPE
  boundaries.



Simpson                                                         [Page 2]
RFC 1619                   PPP over SONET/SDH                   May 1994


4.  Configuration Details

  The standard LCP sync configuration defaults apply to SONET/SDH
  links.

  The following Configuration Options are recommended:

     Magic Number
     No Address and Control Field Compression
     No Protocol Field Compression
     32-bit FCS




Security Considerations

  Security issues are not discussed in this memo.



References

  [1]   Simpson, W., Editor, "The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)", RFC
        1548, Daydreamer, December 1993.

  [2]   Simpson, W., Editor, "PPP in HDLC Framing", RFC 1549,
        Daydreamer, December 1993.

  [3]   "American National Standard for Telecommunications - Digital
        Hierarchy - Optical Interface Rates and Formats Specification",
        ANSI T1.105-1991.

  [4]   "American National Standard for Telecommunications -
        Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) Payload Mappings", ANSI
        T1.105.02-1993 draft.

  [5]   CCITT Recommendation G.707, "Synchronous Digital Hierarchy Bit
        Rates", June 1992.












Simpson                                                         [Page 3]
RFC 1619                   PPP over SONET/SDH                   May 1994


Acknowledgments

  PPP over SONET was first proposed by Craig Partridge (BBN).  Some
  information was obtained from the good folks at Bellcore.

  Technical assistance and information was also provided by Victor
  Demjanenko (SUNY Buffalo).

  Special thanks to Morning Star Technologies for providing computing
  resources and network access support for writing this specification.



Chair's Address

  The working group can be contacted via the current chair:

     Fred Baker
     Advanced Computer Communications
     315 Bollay Drive
     Santa Barbara, California  93117

     EMail: [email protected]



Author's Address

  Questions about this memo can also be directed to:

     William Allen Simpson
     Daydreamer
     Computer Systems Consulting Services
     1384 Fontaine
     Madison Heights, Michigan  48071

     EMail: [email protected]
            [email protected]













Simpson                                                         [Page 4]