NORPLANT'S PHYSICAL SIDE EFFECTS AND IMPLICATIONS

 1. Increase in the number of days of bleeding and spotting with shorter
    menstrual cycle intervals. [1,2]

 2. Changes in the lipid (oil-based) metabolism. This is serious as the lipid
    metabolism is reponsible for controlling and breaking down cholesterol,
    tryglycerides, and lipoproteins. This affects blood pressure, risk of
    heart attack, and blood coagulation. [1]

 3. In approximately ten percent of women, large functional ovarian cysts have
    occurred, some of which required surgery to remove. [1]

 4. Less common side effects include headaches; changes in liver function,
    carbohydrate metabolism, and immunoglobins; and increased body weight and
    serum cholesterol. [1]

 5. A few users also report mood changes, frequent chest pains, acne, numbness
    in the implanted arm, increased body heair growth, uterine cramping, and
    excessive PMS symptoms. [2]

 6. For Norplant users who are diabetic, "there is likely to be a need for
    increased insulin requirements, and those with impaired carbohydrate
    metaboism may become overtly diabetic," indicates the _American Journal of
    Obstetrics and Gynecology_. It also indicated that more studies should be
    carried out on diabetic women and others. [3]

    According to Dr. Philip Darney, professor of obstetrics and gynecology at
    the University of San Francisco Medical School, since no testing has been
    done on teenagers, there are no accurate findings of possible implications
    for their age group. [4]

    The reactions to side effects for those who have used Norplant in the
    United States were summarized in an article published by Family Planning
    Perspectives (a pro-abortion source). The average age of the women studied
    was 28 and they responded as follows:[5]

      1. "Nearly all users reported at least one side effect and four out of
         five reported menstrual changes."

      2. "Ninety-five percent of the women surveyed said they experienced at
         least one side effect while using the implant, while 61 percent had
         experienced two or more."

      3. "Forty-four percent of the women who had experienced any side effects
         said they had considered having the implant removed because of them."

      4. "Only 16 percent of the women who had discontinued because of the
          side effects said they would use implants again."

    Finally, an alarming comment by a pediatrician brings another aspect of
    potential side effects:

    "Comments by Dr. Iris Litt, in the _Journal of the American Medical
    Association_ [Vol. 265, #23, 6/19/91, p. 3100] address a much more
    fundamental issue - that of the effect of dissociating pregnancy
    prevention measures from prevention of STD's. even assuming perfect
    pregnancy prevention (which is never true for any medical intervention),
    removal of fear of pregnancy in my opinion would cause a skyrocketing of
    sexual promiscuity, and attendant STD's, including of course, AIDS....
    I'm afraid Norplant represents a "time bomb" for a dramatic escalation
    of STS's and AIDS." (6)

-- Sources:

 1. Weckenbrock, Paul R. Ph.D, "Norplant: What Is It? How Does it Work? _CCL
    FAMILY Foundations_, vol. XVII, #4, 1-2-91, p.1

 2. Darney, et al., "Acceptance and Perceptions of Morplant Among Users in San
    Franciso, USA," _Studies in Family Planning_, vol. 21, #3, 5-6/90, pp.
    152-160.

 3. Konje, J., M.D., et al., "The effect of Continuous Subdermal
    Levonorgestrel (Norplant) on Carbohydrate Metabolism," _American Journal
    of Obstetrics and Gynecology_, Vol. 166, #1, part 1, 1/92, pp. 15-19.

 4. Allen, C., "norplant - Birth Control or Coercion?" _Wall Street Journal_,
    9/13/91, p. A10.

 5. S. DuBoise Ravenal, M.D., High Point Infant and Child Clinic, Inc., High
    Point, N.C., 6/17/91 citing source listed in quote.

 6. _Journal of the American Medical Association_ (JAMA) Vol. 265, No. 23,
    6/19/91, p. 3100.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   This resource file is made available by the editors and contributors
   to _The ProLife News_, which is a a free, twice-monthly email
   publication.  To receive a sample copy or to subscribe, or to receive
   a list of all of the available Pro Life resource files available in
   the ProLife News Archives, please send a email message to the editor:
   <[email protected]>.

   In all cases, except where explicitly stated, one should assume that
   the copyright to this file is owned by the author and/or sponsoring
   organization.  Copying of this material is free for non-commercial
   use, provided that the contents (including this notice) remain intact.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  Provided courtesy of:

       The Catholic Resource Network
       Trinity Communications
       PO Box 3610
       Manassas, VA 22110
       Voice: 703-791-2576
       Fax: 703-791-4250
       Data: 703-791-4336

  The Catholic Resource Network is a Catholic online information and
  service system. To browse CRNET or join, set your modem to 8 data
  bits, 1 stop bit and no parity, and call 1-703-791-4336.
  -------------------------------------------------------------------