(NOTE: The electronic text obtained from The Electronic Bible Society was
not completely corrected. EWTN has corrected all discovered errors.)

Transliteration of Greek words: All phonetical except: w = omega; h serves
three puposes: 1. = Eta; 2. = rough breathing, when appearing initially
before a vowel; 3. = in the aspirated letters theta = th, phi = ph, chi =
ch. Accents are given immediately after their corresponding vowels: acute =
' , grave = `, circumflex = ^. The character ' doubles as an apostrophe,
when necessary.


LETTERS OF ST. BASIL THE GREAT, 197-236

[Translated by the Rev. Blomfield Jackson, M.A., Vicar of Saint
Bartholomew's, Moor Lane, and Fellow of King's college, London.]


LETTER CXCVII.[2]: To Ambrose, bishop of Milan.[3]

   1. THE gifts of the Lord are ever great and many; in greatness beyond
measure, in number incalculable. To those who are not insensible of His
mercy one of the greatest of these gifts is that of which I am now availing
myself, the opportunity allowed us, far apart in place though we be, of
addressing one another by letter. He grants us two means of becoming
acquainted; one by personal intercourse, another by epistolary
correspondence. Now I have become acquainted with you through what you have
said. I do not mean that my memory is impressed with your outward
appearance, but that the beauty of the inner man has been brought home to
me by the rich variety of your utterances, for each of us "speaketh out of
the abundance of the heart."(1) I have given glory to God, Who in every
generation selects those who are well-pleasing to Him; Who of old indeed
chose from the sheepfold a prince for His people;(2) Who through the Spirit
gifted Amos the herdman with power and raised him up to be a prophet; Who
now has drawn forth for the care of Christ's flock a man from the imperial
city, entrusted with the government of a whole nation, exalted in
character, in lineage, in position, in eloquence, in all that this world
admires. This same man has flung away all the advantages of the world,
counting them all loss that he may gain Christ,(3) and has taken in his
hand the helm of the ship, great and famous for its faith in God, the
Church of Christ. Come, then, O man of God; not from men have you received
or been taught the Gospel of Christ; it is the Lord Himself who has
transferred you from the judges of the earth to the throne of the Apostles;
fight the good right; heal the infirmity of the people, if any are infected
by the disease of Arian madness; renew the ancient footprints of the
Fathers. You have laid the foundation of affection towards me; strive to
build upon it by the frequency of your salutations. Thus shall we be able
to be near one another in spirit, although our earthly homes are far apart.

   2. By your earnestness and zeal in the matter of the blessed bishop
Dionysius you testify all your love to the Lord, your honour for your
predecessors, and your zeal for the fairly. For our disposition towards our
faithful fellow-servants is referred to the Lord Whom they have served.
Whoever honours men that have contended for the faith proves that he has
like zeal for it. One single action is proof of much virtue.

   I wish to acquaint your love in Christ that the very zealous brethren
who have been commissioned by your reverence to act for you in this good
work have won praise for all the clergy by the amiability of their manners;
for by their individual modesty and conciliatoriness they have shewn the
sound condition of all. Moreover, with all zeal and diligence they have
braved an inclement season; and with unbroken perseverance have persuaded
the faithful guardians of the blessed body to transmit to them the custody
of what they have regarded as the safeguard of their lives. And you must
understand that they are men who would never have been forced by any human
authority or sovereignty, had not the perseverance of these brethren moved
them to compliance. No doubt a great aid to the attainment of the object
desired was the presence of our well beloved and reverend son Therasius the
presbyter. He voluntarily undertook all the toil of the journey; he
moderated the energy of the faithful on the spot; he persuaded opponents by
his arguments; in the presence of priests and deacons, and of many others
who fear the Lord, he took up the relics with all becoming reverence, and
has aided the brethren in their preservation. These relics do you receive
with a joy equivalent to the distress with which their custodians have
parted with them and sent them to you. Let none dispute; let none doubt.
Here you have that unconquered athlete. These bones, which shared in the
conflict with the blessed soul, are known to the Lord. These bones He will
crown, together with that soul, in the righteous day of His requital, as it
is written, "we must stand before the judgment seat of Christ, that each
may give an account of the deeds he has done in the body."(1) One coffin
held that honoured corpse. None other lay by his side. The burial was a
noble one; the honours of a martyr were paid him. Christians who had
welcomed him as a guest and then with their own hands laid him in the
grave, have now disinterred him. They have wept as men bereaved of a father
and a champion. But they have sent him to you, for they put your joy before
their own consolation. Pious were the hands that gave; scrupulously careful
were the hands that received. There has been no room for deceit; no room
for guile. I bear witness to this. Let the untainted truth be accepted by
you.

LETTER CXCVIII.(2): To Eusebius, bishop of Samosata.

   AFTER the letter conveyed to me by the officiales(3) I have received
one other despatched to me later. I have not sent many myself, for I have
not found any one travelling in your direction. But I have sent more than
the four, among which also were those conveyed to me from Samosata after
the first epistle of your holiness. These I have sealed and sent to our
honourable brother Leontius, peraequator of Nicaea, urging that by his
agency they may be delivered to the steward of the household of our
honourable brother Sophronius, that he may see to their transmission to
you.

As my letters are going through many hands, it is likely enough that
because one man is very busy or very careless, your reverence may never get
them. Pardon me, then, I beseech you, if my letters are few. With your
usual intelligence you have properly found fault with me for not sending,
as I ought, a courier of my own when there was occasion for doing so; but
you must understand that we have had a winter of such severity that all the
roads were blocked till Easter, and I had no one disposed to brave the
difficulties of the journey. For although our clergy do seem very numerous,
they are men inexperienced in travelling because they never traffic, and
prefer not to live far away from home, the majority of them plying
sedentary crafts, whereby they get their daily bread. The brother whom I
have now sent to your reverence I have summoned from the country, and
employed in the conveyance of my letter to your holiness, that he may both
give you clear intelligence as to me and my affairs, and, moreover, by
God's grace, bring me back plain and prompt information about you and
yours. Our dear brother Eusebius the reader has for some time been anxious
to hasten to your holiness, but I have kept him here for the weather to
improve. Even now I am under no little anxiety lest his inexperience in
travelling may cause him trouble, and bring on some illness; for he is not
robust.

   2. I need say nothing to you by letter about the innovations of the
East, for the brothers can themselves give you accurate information. You
must know, my honoured friend, that, when I was writing these words, I was
so ill that I had lost all hope of life. It is impossible for me to
enumerate all my painful symptoms, my weakness, the violence of my attacks
of fever, and my bad health in general. One point only may be selected. I
have now completed the time of my sojourn in this miserable and painful
life.

LETTER CXCIX.(1): CANONICA SECUNDA. To Amphilochius, concerning the Canons.

   I WROTE some time ago in reply to the questions of your reverence, but
I did not send the letter, partly because from my long and dangerous
illness I had not time to do so; partly because I had no one to send with
it. I have but few men with me who are experienced in travelling and fit
for service of this kind. When you thus learn the causes of my delay,
forgive me. I have been quite astonished at your readiness to learn and at
your humility. You are entrusted with the office of a teacher, and yet you
condescend to learn, and to learn of me, who pretend to no great knowledge.
Nevertheless, since you consent, on account of your fear of God, to do what
another man might hesitate to do, I am bound for my part to go even beyond
my strength in aiding your readiness and righteous zeal.

   XVII. You asked me about the presbyter Bianor--can he be admitted among
the clergy, because of his oath? I know that I have already given the
clergy of Antioch a general sentence in the case of all those who had sworn
with him; namely, that they should abstain from the public congregations,
but might perform priestly functions in private.(1) Moreover, he has the
further liberty for the performance of his ministerial functions, from the
fact that his sacred duties lie not at Antioch, but at Iconium; for, as you
have written to me yourself, he has chosen to live rather at the latter
than at the former place. The man in question may, therefore, be received;
but your reverence must require him to shew repentance for the rash
readiness of the oath which he took before the unbeliever,(2) being unable
to bear the trouble of that small peril.

   XVIII. Concerning fallen virgins, who, after professing a chaste life
before the Lord, make their vows vain, because they have fallen under the
lusts of the flesh, our fathers, tenderly(1) and meekly making allowance
for the infirmities of them that fall, laid down that they might be
received after a year, ranking them with the digamists. Since, however, by
God's grace the Church grows mightier as she advances, and the order of
virgins is becoming more numerous, it is my judgment that careful heed
should be given both to the act as it appears upon consideration, and to
the mind of Scripture, which may be discovered from the context. Widowhood
is inferior to virginity; consequently the sin of the widows comes far
behind that of the virgins. Let us see what Paul writes to Timothy. "The
young widows refuse: for when they have begun tO wax wanton against Christ,
they will marry; having damnation because they have cast off their first
faith."(2) If, therefore, a widow lies under a very heavy charge, as
setting at naught her faith in Christ, what must we think of the virgin,
who is the bride of Christ, and a chosen vessel dedicated to the Lord? It
is a grave fault even on the part of a slave to give herself away in secret
wedlock and fill the house with impurity, and, by her wicked life, to wrong
her owner; but it is forsooth far more shocking for the bride to become an
adulteress, and, dishonouring her union with the bridegroom, to yield
herself to unchaste indulgence. The widow, as being a corrupted slave, is
indeed condemned; but the virgin comes under the charge of adultery. We
call the man who lives with another man's wife an adulterer, and do not
receive him into communion until he has ceased from his sin; and so we
shall ordain in the case of him who has the virgin. One point, however,
must be determined beforehand, that the name virgin is given to a woman who
voluntarily devotes herself to the Lord, renounces marriage, and embraces a
life of holiness. And we admit professions dating from the age of full
intelligence.(3) For it is not right in such cases to admit the words of
mere children. But a girl of sixteen or seventeen years of age, in full
possession of her faculties, who has been submitted to strict examination,
and is then constant, and persists in her entreaty to be admitted, may then
be ranked among the virgins, her profession ratified, and its violation
rigorously punished. Many girls are brought forward by their parents and
brothers, and other kinsfolk, before they are of full age, and have no
inner impulse towards a celibate life. The object of the friends is simply
to provide for themselves. Such women as these must not be readily
received, before we have made public investigation of their own sentiments.

   XIX. I do not recognise the profession of men, except in the case of
those who have enrolled themselves in the order of monks, and seem to have
secretly adopted the celibate life. Yet in their case I think it becoming
that there should be a previous examination, and that a distinct profession
should be received from them, so that whenever they may revert to the life
of the pleasures of the flesh, they may be subjected to the punishment of
fornicators.

   XX. I do not think that any condemnation ought to be passed on women
who professed virginity while in heresy, and then afterwards preferred
marriage. "What things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under
the law."(1) Those who have not yet put on Christ's yoke do not recognise
the laws of the Lord. They are therefore to be received in the church, as
having remission in the case of these sins too, as of all, from their faith
in Christ. As a general rule, all sins formerly committed in the
catechumenical state are not taken into [account.(2) The Church does not
receive these persons without baptism; and it is very necessary that in
such cases the birthrights should be observed.

   XXI. If a man living with a wife is not satisfied with his marriage and
falls into fornication, I account him a fornicator, and prolong his period
of punishment. Nevertheless, we have no canon subjecting him to the charge
of adultery, if the sin be committed against an unmarried woman. For the
adulteress, it is said, "being polluted shall be polluted,"(3) and she
shall not return to her husband: and "He that keepeth an adulteress is a
fool and impious."(4) He, however, who has committed fornication is not to
be cut off from the society of his own wife. So the wife will receive the
husband on his return from fornication, but the husband will expel the
polluted woman from his house. The argument here is not easy, but the
custom has so obtained.(4)

   XXII. Men who keep women carried off by violence, if they carried them
off when betrothed to other men, must not be received before removal of the
women and their restoration to those to whom they were first contracted,
whether they wish to receive them, or to separate from them. In the case of
a girl who has been taken when not betrothed, she ought first to be
removed, and restored to her own people, and handed over to the will of,
her own people whether parents, or brothers, or any one having authority
over her. If they choose to give her up, the cohabitation may stand; but,
if they refuse, no violence should be used. In the case of a man having a
wife by seduction, be it secret or by violence, he must be held guilty of
fornication. The punishment of fornicators is fixed at four years. In the
first year they must be expelled from prayer, and weep at the door of the
church; in the second they may be received to sermon; in the third to
penance; in the fourth to standing with the people, while they are withheld
from the oblation. Finally, they may be admitted to the communion of the
good gift.

   XXIII. Concerning men who marry two sisters, or women who marry two
brothers a short letter of mine has been published, of which I have sent a
copy to your reverence.(1) The man who has taken his own brother's wife is
not to be received until he have separated from her.

   XXIV. A widow whose name is in the list of widows, that is, who is
supported(2) by the Church, is ordered by the Apostle to be supported no
longer when she marries.(3)

   There is no special rule for a widower. The punishment appointed for
digamy may suffice. If a widow who is sixty years of age chooses again to
live with a husband, she shall be held unworthy of the communion of the
good gift until she be moved no longer by her impure desire. If we reckon
her before sixty years, the blame rests with us, and not with the woman.

   XXV. The man who retains as his wife the woman whom he has violated,
shall be liable to the penalty of rape, but it shall be lawful for him to
have her to wife.

   XXVI. Fornication is not wedlock, nor yet the beginning of wedlock.
Wherefore it is best, if possible, to put asunder those who are united in
fornication. If they are set on cohabitation, let them admit the penalty of
fornication. Let them be allowed to live together, lest a worse thing
happen.

   XXVII. As to the priest ignorantly involved in an illegal marriage,(1)
I have made the fitting regulation, that he may hold his seat, but must
abstain from other functions. For such a case pardon is enough. It is
unreasonable that the man who has to treat his own wounds should be
blessing another, for benediction is the imparting of holiness. How can he
who through his fault, committed in ignorance, is without holiness, impart
it to another? Let him bless neither in public nor in private, nor
distribute the body of Christ to others, nor perform any other sacred
function, but, content with his seat of honour, let him beseech the Lord
with weeping, that his sin, committed in ignorance, may be forgiven.

   XXVIII. It has seemed to me ridiculous that any one should make a vow
to abstain from swine's flesh. Be so good as to teach men to abstain from
foolish vows and promises. Represent the use to be quite indifferent. No
creature of God, received with thanksgiving, is to be rejected.(2) The vow
is ridiculous; the abstinence unnecessary.

   XXIX. It is especially desirable that attention should be given to the
case of persons in power who threaten on oath to do some hurt to those
under their authority. The remedy is twofold. In the first place, let them
be taught not to take oaths at random: secondly, not to persist in their
wicked determinations. Any one who is arrested in the design of fulfilling
an oath to injure another ought to shew repentance for the rashness of his
oath, and must not confirm his wickedness under the pretext of piety. Herod
was none the better for fulfilling his oath, when, of course only to save
himself from perjury, he became the prophet's murderer.(3) Swearing is
absolutely forbidden,(4) and it is only reasonable that the oath which
tends to evil should be condemned. The swearer must therefore change his
mind, and not persist in confirming his impiety. Consider the absurdity of
the thing a little further. Suppose a man to swear that he will put his
brother's eyes out: is it well for him to carry his oath into action? Or to
commit murder? or to break any other commandment? "I have sworn, and I will
perform it,"(1) not to sin, but to "keep thy righteous judgments." It is no
less our duty to undo and destroy sin, than it is to confirm the
commandment by immutable counsels.

   XXX. As to those guilty of abduction we have no ancient rule, but I
have expressed my own judgment. The period is three years;(2) the culprits
and their accomplices to be excluded from service. The act committed
without violence is not liable to punishment, whenever it has not been
preceded by violation or robbery. The widow is independent, and to follow
or not is in her own power. We must, therefore, pay no heed to excuses.

   XXXI. A woman whose husband has gone away and disappeared, and who
marries another, before she has evidence of his death, commits adultery.
Clerics who are guilty of the sin unto death(3) are degraded from their
order, but not excluded from the communion of the laity. Thou shall not
punish twice for the same fault.(4)

   XXXIII. Let an indictment for murder be preferred against the woman who
gives birth to a child on the road and pays no attention to it.

   XXXIV. Women who had committee adultery, and confessed their fault
through piety, or were in any way convicted, were not allowed by our
fathers to be publicly exposed, that we might not cause their death after
conviction. But they ordered that they should be excluded from communion
till they had fulfilled their term of penance.

   XXXV. In the case of a man deserted by his wife, the cause of the
desertion must be taken into account. If she appear to have abandoned him
without reason, he is deserving of pardon, but the wife of punishment.
Pardon will be given to him that he may communicate with the Church.

   XXXVI. Soldiers' wives who have married in their husbands' absence will
come under the same principle as wives who, when their husbands have been
on a journey, have not waited their return. Their case, however, does admit
of some concession on the ground of there being greater reason to suspect
death.

   XXXVII. The man who marries after abducting another man's wife will
incur the charge of adultery for the first case; but for the second will go
free.

   XXXVIII. Girls who follow against their fathers' will commit
fornication; but if their fathers are reconciled to them, the act seems to
admit of a remedy. They are not however immediately restored to communion,
but are to be punished for three years.

   XXXIX. The woman who lives with an adulterer is an adulteress the whole
time.(1)

   XL. The woman who yields to a man against her master's will commits
fornication; but if afterwards she accepts free marriage, she marries. The
former case is fornication; the latter marriage. The covenants of persons
who are not independent have no validity.

   XLI. The woman in widowhood, who is independent, may dwell with a
husband without blame, if there is no one to prevent their cohabitation;
for the Apostle says; "but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be
married to whom she will; only in the Lord."(2)

   XLII. Marriages contracted without the permission of those in
authority, are fornication. If neither father nor master be living the
contracting parties are free from blame; just as if the authorities assent
to the cohabitation, it assumes the fixity of marriage.

   XLIII. He who smites his neighbour to death is a murderer, whether he
struck first or in self defence.

   XLIV. The deaconess who commits fornication with a heathen may be
received into repentance and will be admitted to the oblation in the
seventh year; of course if she be living in chastity. The heathen who,
after he has believed, takes to idolatry, returns to his vomit. We do not,
however, give up the body of the deaconess to the use of the flesh, as
being consecrated.

   XLV. If any one, after taking the name of Christianity, insults Christ,
he gets no good froth the name.

   XLVI. The woman who unwillingly marries a man deserted at the time by
his wife, and is afterwards repudiated, because of the return of the former
to him, commits fornication, but involuntarily. She will, therefore, not be
prohibited from marriage; but it is better if she remain as she is.(3)

   XLVII. Encratitae,(4) Saccophori,(5) and Apotactitae(1) are not
regarded in the same manner as Novatians, since in their case a canon has
been pronounced, although different; while of the former nothing has been
said. All these I re-baptize on the same principle. If among you their re-
baptism is forbidden, for the sake of some arrangement, nevertheless let my
principle prevail. Their heresy is, as it were, an offshoot of the
Marcionites, abominating, as they do, marriage, refusing wine, and calling
God's creature polluted. We do not therefore receive them into the Church,
unless they be baptized into our baptism. Let them not say that they have
been baptized into Father, Son and Holy Ghost, inasmuch as they make God
the author of evil, after the example of Marcion and the rest of the
heresies. Wherefore, if this be determined on, more bishops ought to meet
together in one place and publish the canon in these terms, that action may
be taken without peril, and authority given to answers to questions of this
kind.

   XLVIII. The woman who has been abandoned by her husband, ought, in my
judgment, to remain as she is. The Lord said, "If any one leave(2) his
wife, saving for the cause of fornication, he causeth her to commit
adultery;"(3) thus, by calling her adulteress, He excludes her from
intercourse with another man. For how can the man being guilty, as having
caused adultery, and the woman, go without blame, when she is called
adulteress by the Lord for having intercourse with another man?

   XLIX. Suffering violation should not be a cause of condemnation. So the
slave girl, if she has been forced by her own master, is free from blame.

   L. There is no law as to trigamy: a third marriage is not contracted by
law. We look upon such things as the defilements of the Church. But we do
not subject them to public condemnation, as being better than unrestrained
fornication.(4)

LETTER CC.(5): To Amphilochius, bishop of Iconium.

   I AM attacked by sickness after sickness, and all the work given me,
not only by the affairs of the Church, but by those who are troubling the
Church, has detained me during the whole winter, and up to the present
time. It has been therefore quite impossible for me to send any one to you
or to pay you a visit. I conjecture that you are similarly situated; not,
indeed, as to  sickness, God forbid; may the Lord grant you continued
health for carrying out His commandments. But I know that the care of the
Churches gives you the same distress as it does me. I was now about to send
some one to get me accurate information about your condition. But when my
well beloved son Meletius, who is moving the newly enlisted troops,
reminded me of the opportunity of my saluting you by him, I gladly accepted
the occasion to write and had recourse to the kind services of the conveyor
of my letter. He is one who may himself serve instead of a letter, both
because of his amiable disposition, and of his being well acquainted with
all which concerns me. By him, then, I beseech your reverence especially to
pray for me, that the Lord may grant to me a riddance from this troublesome
body of mine; to His Churches, peace; and to you, rest; and,  whenever you
have settled the affairs of Lycaonia in apostolic fashion, as you have
began, an opportunity to visit also this place. Whether I be sojourning in
the flesh, or shall have been already bidden to take my departure to the
Lord, I hope that you will interest yourself in our part of the world, as
your own, as indeed it is, strengthening all that is weak, rousing all that
is slothful and, by the help of the Spirit Which abides in you,
transforming everything into a condition well pleasing to the Lord. My very
honourable sons, Meletius and Melitius, whom you have known for some time,
and know to be devoted to yourself, keep in your good care and pray for
them. This is enough to keep them in safety. Salute in my name, I beg you,
all who are with your holiness, both all the clergy, and all the laity
under your pastoral care, and my very religious brothers and fellow
ministers. Bear in mind the memory of the blessed martyr Eupsychius, and do
not wait for me to mention him again. Do not take pains to come on the
exact day, but anticipate it, and so give me joy, if I be yet living on
this earth. Till then may you, by the grace of the Holy One, be preserved
for me and for God's Churches, enjoying health and wealth in the Lord, and
praying for me.

LETTER CCI: To Amphilochius, bishop of Iconium.

   I LONG to meet you for many reasons, that I may have the benefit of
your advice in the matters I had in hand, and that on beholding you after a
long interval I may have some comfort for your absence. But since both of
us are prevented by the same reasons, you by the illness which has befallen
you, and I by the malady of longer standing which has not yet left me, let
us, if you will, each forgive the other, that both may free ourselves from
blame.

LETTER CCII: To Amphilochius, bishop of Iconium.

   Under other circumstances I should think it a special privilege to meet
with your reverence, but above all now, when the business which brings us
together is of such great importance. But so much of my illness as still
clings to me is enough to prevent my stirring ever so short a distance. I
tried to drive as far as the martyrs(3) and had a relapse almost into my
old state. You must therefore forgive me. If the matter can be put off for
a few days, I will, by God's grace join you, and share your anxieties. If
the business presses, do, by God's help, what has to be done; but reckon me
as present with you and as participating in your worthy deeds. May you, by
the grace of the Holy One, be preserved to God's Church, strong and joyous
in the Lord, and praying for me.

LETTER CCIII.(4): To the bishops of the sea coast.(5)

   I Have had a strong desire to meet you, but from time to time some
hindrance has supervened and prevented my fulfilling my purpose. I have
either been hindered by sickness, and you know well how, from my early
manhood to my present old age, this ailment has been my constant
companion, brought up with me, and chastising me, by the righteous judgment
of God, Who ordains all things in wisdom; or by the cares of the Church, or
by struggles with the opponents of the doctrines of truth. [Up to this day
I live in much affliction and grief, having the feeling present before me,
that you are wanting to me. For when God tells me, who took on Him His
sojourn in the flesh for the very purpose that, by patterns of duty, He
might regulate our life, and might by His own voice announce to us the
Gospel of the kingdom,--when He says, 'By this shall all men know that ye
are my disciples, if ye love one another,'  and whereas the Lord left His
own peace to His disciples as a farewell gift,(1) when about to complete
the dispensation in the flesh, saying, 'Peace I leave with you, My peace I
give you,' I cannot persuade myself that without love to others, and
without, as far as rests with me, peaceableness towards all, I can be
called a worthy servant of Jesus Christ. I have waited a long while for the
chance of your love paying us a visit. For ye are not ignorant that we,
being exposed to all, as rocks running out in the sea, sustain the fury of
the heretical waves, which, in that they break around us, do not cover the
district behind. I say "we" in order to refer it, not to human power, but
to the grace of God, Who, by the weakness of men shows His power, as says
the prophet in the person of the Lord, 'Will ye not fear Me, who have
placed the sand as a boundary to the sea? ' for by the weakest and most
contemptible of all things, the sand, the Mighty One has bounded the great
and fall sea. Since, then, this is our position, it became your love to be
frequent in sending true brothers to visit us who labour with the storm,
and more frequently letters of love, partly to confirm our courage, partly
to correct any mistake of ours. For we confess that we are liable to
numberless mistakes, being men, and living in the flesh.]

   2. But hitherto, very honourable brethren, you have not given me my
due; and this for two reasons. Either you failed to perceive the proper
course; or else, under the influence of some of the columnies spread abroad
about me, you did not think me deserving of being visited by you in love.
Now, therefore, I myself take the initiative. I beg to state that I am
perfectly ready to rid myself, in your presence, of the charges urged
against me, but only on condition that my revilers are admitted to stand
face to face with me before your reverences. If I am convicted, I shall not
deny my error. You, after the conviction, will receive pardon from the Lord
for withdrawing yourselves from the communion of me a sinner. The
successful accusers, too, will have their reward in the publication of my
secret wickedness. If, however, you condemn me before you have the evidence
before you, I shall be none the worse, barring the loss I shall sustain of
a possession I hold most dear- -your love: while you, for your part, will
suffer the same loss in losing me, and will seem to be running counter to
the words of the Gospel: "Doth our law judge any man before it hear
him?"(1) The reviler, moreover, if he adduce no proof of what he says, will
be shewn to have got nothing from his wicked language but a bad name for
himself. For what name can be properly applied to the slanderer(2) except
that which he professes to bear by the very conduct of which be is guilty?
Let the reviler, therefore, appear not as slanderer,(3) but as accuser;
nay, I will not call him accuser, I will rather regard him as a brother,
admonishing in love, and producing conviction for my amendment. And you
must not be hearers of calumny, but triers of proof. Nor must I be left
uncured, because my sin is not being made manifest.

   [3. Let not this consideration influence you. 'We dwell on the sea, we
are exempt from the sufferings of the generality, we need no succour from
others; so what is the good to us of foreign communion?' For the same Lord
Who divided the islands from the continent by the sea, bound the island
Christians to those of the continent by love. Nothing, brethren, separates
us froth each other, but deliberate estrangement. We have one Lord, one
faith, the same hope. The hands need each other; the feet steady each
other. The eyes possess their clear apprehension from agreement. We, for
our part, confess our own weakness, and we seek your fellow feeling. For we
are assured, that though ye are not present in body, yet by the aid of
prayer, ye will do us much benefit in these most critical times. It is
neither decorous before men, nor pleasing to God, that you should make
avowals which not even the Gentiles adopt, which know not God. Even they,
as we hear, though the country they live in be sufficient for all things,
yet, on account of the uncertainty of the future, make much of alliances
with each other, and seek mutual intercourse as being advantageous to them.
Yet we, the sons of fathers who have laid down the law that by brief notes
the proofs of communion should be carried about from one end of the earth
to the other, and that all should be citizens and familiars with all, now
sever ourselves from the whole world, and are neither ashamed at our
solitariness, nor shudder that on us is fallen the fearful prophecy of the
Lord, 'Because of lawlessness abounding, the love of the many shall wax
cold.']

   4. Do not, most honourable brethren, do not suffer this. Rather, by
letters of peace and by salutations of love, comfort me for the past. You
have made a wound in my heart by your former neglect. Soothe its anguish,
as it were, by a tender touch. Whether you wish to come to me, and examine
for yourselves into the truth of what you hear of my infirmities, or
whether by the addition of more lies my sins are reported to you to be yet
more grievous, I must accept even this. I am ready to welcome you with open
hands and to offer myself to the strictest test, only let love preside over
the proceedings. Or if you prefer to indicate any spot in your own district
to which I may come and pay you the visit which is due, submitting myself,
as far as may be, to examination, for the healing of the past, and the
prevention of slander for the future, I accept this. Although my flesh is
weak, yet, as long as I breathe, I am responsible for the due discharge of
every duty which may tend to the edification of the Churches of Christ. Do
not, I beseech you. make light of my entreaty. Do not force me to disclose
my distress to others. Hitherto, brethren, as you are well aware, I have
kept my grief to myself, for I blush to speak of your alienation from me to
those of our communion who are at a distance. I shrink at once from paining
them and from gratifying those who hate me. I alone am writing this now;
but I send in the name of all the brethren in Cappadocia, who have charged
me not to employ any chance messenger, but some one who, in case I should,
from my anxiety not to be too prolix, leave out any points of importance,
might supply them with the intelligence wherewith God has gifted him. I
refer to my beloved and reverend fellow presbyter Petrus. Welcome him in
love, and send him forth to me in peace, that he may be a messenger to me
of good things.

LETTER CCIV.(1): To the Neocaesarcans.(2) [Passages in brackets translated
by J. H. Newman.]

   1. [THERE has been a long silence on both sides, revered and well-
beloved brethren, just as if there were angry feelings between us. Yet who
is there so sullen and implacable towards the party which has injured him,
as to lengthen out the resentment which has begun in disgust through almost
a whole life of man?] This [is happening in our case, no just occasion of
estrangement existing, as far as I myself know, but on the contrary, there
being, from the first, many strong reasons for the closest friendship and
unity. The greatest and first is this, our Lord's command, pointedly
saying, "By this shall  all men know that ye are my disciples if ye have
love one to another."(3)] Again, the apostle clearly sets before us the
good of charity where he tells us that love is the fulfilling of the
law;(4) and again where he says that charity is a good thing to be
preferred to all great and good things, in the words. "Though I speak with
tongues of men and of angels and have not charity, I am become as sounding
brass or a tinkling cymbal. And though I have the gift of prophecy and
understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith,
so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. And
though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor and though I give my body to
be burnt and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing."(5) Not that each
of the points enumerated could be performed without love, but that the Holy
One wishes, as He Himself has said, to attribute to the commandment super-
eminent excellency by the figure of hyperbole.(6)

   2. [Next, if it tend much towards intimacy to have the same teachers,
there are to you and to me the same teachers of  God's mysteries, and
spiritual Fathers, who from the beginning were the founders of your Church.
I mean the great Gregory, and all who succeeding in order to the throne of
your episcopate, like stars rising one after another, have tracked the same
course, so as to leave the tokens of the heavenly polity most clear to all
who desire them.] And if natural relationships are not to be despised, but
are greatly conducive to unbroken union and fellowship, these rights also
exist naturally for you and me. [Why is it, then, O venerable among cities,
for through you I address the whole city, that no civil writing comes from
you, no welcome voice, but your ears are open to those who aim at slander?]
I am therefore the more bound to groan, the more I perceive the end they
have in view. There is no doubt as to who is the originator of the
slander.(1) He is known by many evil deeds, but is best distinguished by
this particular wickedness, and it is for this reason that the sin is made
his name.(2) But you must pat up with my plain speaking. You have opened
both ears to my slanderers. You heartily welcome all you hear without any
enquiry. Not one of you distinguishes between lies and truth. Who ever
suffered for lack of wicked accusations when struggling all alone? Who was
ever convicted of lying in the absence of his victim? What plea does not
sound plausible to the hearers when the reviler persists that such and such
is the case, and the reviled is neither present nor hears what is urged
against him? Does not even the accepted custom of this world teach you, in
reference to these matters, that if any one is to be a fair and impartial
hearer, he must not be entirely led away by the first speaker, but must
wait for the defence of the accused, that so truth may be demonstrated by a
comparison of the arguments on both sides? "Judge righteous judgment."(3)
This precept is one of those most necessary for salvation.

   3. When I say this I am not forgetful of the words of the Apostle, who
fled from human tribunals and reserved the defence of all his life for the
unerring judgment seat, when he said, "With me it is a very small thing
that I should be judged of you or of man's judgment."(4) Your ears have
been preoccupied by lying slanders, slanders that have touched my conduct,
slanders that have touched my faith in God. Nevertheless, knowing, as I do,
that three persons at once are injured by the slanderer, his victim, his
hearer, and himself; as to my own wrong, I would have held my tongue, be
sure; not because I despise your good opinion,(how could I, writing now as
I do and earnestly pleading as I do that I may not lose it?) but because I
see that of the three sufferers the one who is least injured is myself. It
is true that I shall be robbed of you, but you are being robbed of the
truth, and he who is at the bottom of all this is parting me from you, but
he is alienating himself from the Lord, inasmuch as no one can be brought
near to the Lord by doing what is forbidden. Rather then for your sakes
than for mine, rather to rescue you from unendurable wrong am I pleading.
For who could suffer a worse calamity than the loss of the most precious of
all things, the truth?

   4. [What say I, brethren? Not that I am a sinless person; not that my
life is not full of numberless faults. I know myself; and indeed I cease
not my tears for my sins, if by any means I may be able to appease my d,
and to escape the punishment threatened against them. But this I say: let
him who: judges me, hunt for motes in my eye, if he can say that his own is
clear.] I own, brethren, that I need the care of the sound and healthy, and
need much of it. If he cannot say that it is clear, and the clearer it is
the less will he say so--(for it is the part of the perfect not to exalt
themselves; if they do they will certainly come under the charge of the
pride of the Pharisee, who, while justifying himself, condemned the
publican) let him come with me to the physician let him not "judge before
the time until the Lord come, who both will bring to light the hidden
things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts."(1)
Let him remember the words. "Judge not, and ye shall not be judged; "(2)
and "Condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned."(3) [In a word, brethren,
if my offences admit of cure, why does not such an one obey the teacher of
the Churches, "Reprove, exhort, rebuke"?(4) If, on the other hand, my
iniquity he past cure, why does he not withstand me to the face, and, by
publishing my transgressions, deliver the Churches from the mischief which
I bring on them?] Do not put up with the calumny uttered against me within
the teeth.(5) This is the abuse which any slave-girl from the grindstone
might utter; this is the kind of fine shewing-off you might expect from any
street vagabond; their tongues are whetted for any slander. But [there are
bishops; let appeal be made to them. There is a clergy in each of God's
dioceses;(6) let the most eminent be assembled. Let whoso will, speak
freely, that I may have to deal with a charge, not a slander.] Let my
secret wickedness be brought into full view; let me no longer be hated, but
admonished as a brother. It is more just that we sinners should be pitied
by the blessed and the sinless, than that we should be treated angrily.

   5. [If the fault be a point of faith, let the document be pointed out
to me. Again, let a fair and impartial inquiry be appointed. Let the
accusation be read; let it be brought to the test, whether it does not
arise from ignorance in the accuser, not from blame in the matter of the
writing. For right things often do not seem such to those who are deficient
in accurate judgment. Equal weights seem unequal when the arms of the
balance are of different sizes.] Men whose sense of taste is destroyed by
sickness, sometimes think honey sour. A diseased eye does not see many
things which do exist, and notes many things which do not exist. The same
thing frequently takes place with regard to the force of words, when the
critic is inferior to the writer. The critic ought really to set out with
much the same training and equipment as the author. A man ignorant of
agriculture is quite incapable of criticising husbandry, and the
distinctions between harmony and discord can only be adequately judged by a
trained musician. But any one who chooses will set up for a literary
critic, though he cannot tell us where he went to school, or how much time
was spent in his education, and knows nothing about letters at all. I see
clearly that, even in the case of the words(1) of the Holy Spirit, the
investigation of the terms is to be attempted not by every one, but by him
who has the spirit of discernment, as the Apostle has taught us, in the
differences of gifts;--"For to one is given by the Spirit the word of
wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; to another
faith by the same Spirit; to another the gift of healing by the same
Spirit; to another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another
discerning of spirits."(2) If, therefore, my gifts are spiritual, he who
wishes to judge them must shew proof of his own possession of the gift of
"discerning of spirits." If, on the contrary, as he calumniously contends,
my gifts are of the wisdom of this world, let him shew that he is an adept
in this world's wisdom, and I will submit myself to his verdict. And [let
no one suppose that I am making excuses to evade the charge. I put it into
your hands, dearest brethren, to investigate for yourselves the points
alleged against me. Are you so slow of intelligence as to be wholly
dependent upon advocates for the discovery of the truth? If the points in
question seem to you to be quite plain of themselves, persuade the jesters
to drop the dispute. [If there be anything you do not understand, put
questions to me, through appointed persons who will do justice to me; or
ask of me explanations in writing. And take all kinds of pains that nothing
may be left unsifted.

   6. What clearer evidence can there be of my faith, than that I was
brought up by my grandmother, blessed woman, who came from you? I mean the
celebrated Macrina who taught me the words of the blessed Gregory; which,
as far as memory had preserved down to her day, she cherished herself.
while she fashioned and formed me, while yet a child, upon the doctrines of
piety. And when I gained the capacity of thought, my reason being matured
by full age, I travelled over much sea and land, and whomsoever I found
walking in the rule of godliness delivered, those I set down as fathers,]
and made them my soul's guides in my journey to God. And up to this day, by
the grace of Him who has called me in His holy calling to the knowledge of
Himself, I know of no doctrine opposed to the sound teaching having sunk
into my heart; nor was my soul ever polluted by the ill-famed blasphemy of
Arius. If I have ever received into communion any who have come from that
teacher, hiding their unsoundness deep within them, or speaking words of
piety, or, at any rate. not opposing what has been said by me, it is on
these terms that I have admitted them; and I have not allowed my judgment
concerning them to rest wholly with myself, but have followed the decisions
given about them by our Fathers. For after receiving the letter of the very
blessed Father Athanasius, bishop of Alexandria, which I hold in my hand,
and shew to any one who asks, wherein he has distinctly declared that any
one expressing a wish to come over from the heresy of the Arians and
accepting the Nicene Creed. is to be received without hesitation and
difficulty, citing in support of his opinion the unanimous assent of the
bishops of Macedonia and of Asia; I, considering myself bound to follow the
high authority of such a man and of those who made the rule, and with every
desire on my own part to win the reward promised to peacemakers, did enroll
in the lists of communicants all who accepted that creed.

   7. [The fair thing would be to judge of me, not from one or two who do
not walk uprightly in the truth, but from the multitude of bishops
throughout the world, connected with me by the grace of the Lord. Make
enquiries of Pisidians, Lycaonians, Isaurians, Phrygians of both provinces,
Armenians your neighbours, Macedonians, Achaeans. Illyrians, Gauls.
Spaniards, the whole of Italy, Sicilians, Africans, the healthy part of
Egypt, whatever is left of Syria; all of whom send letters to me, and in
turn receive them from me.] From these letters, alike from all which are
despatched from them. and from all which go out from us to them, you may
learn that we are all of one mind, and of one opinion. [Whoso shuns
communion with me, it cannot escape your accuracy, cuts himself off from
the whole Church. Look round about, brethren, with whom do you hold
communion? If you will not receive it from me, who remains to acknowledge
you? Do not reduce me to the necessity of counselling anything unpleasant
concerning a Church so dear to me.] There are things now which I hide in
the bottom of my heart, in secret groaning over and bewailing the evil days
in which we live, in that the greatest Churches which have long been united
to one another in brotherly love, now, without any reason, are in mutual
opposition. Do not, oh! do not, drive me to complain of these things to all
who are in communion with me. Do not force me to give utterance to words
which hitherto I have kept in check by reflection and have hidden in my
heart. Better were it for me to be removed and the Churches to be at one,
than that God's people should suffer such evil through our childish ill-
will. [Ask your fathers, and they will tell you that though our districts
were divided in position, yet in mind they were one, and were governed by
one sentiment. Intercourse of the people was frequent; frequent the visits
of the clergy; the pastors, too, had such mutual affection, that each used
the other as teacher and guide in things pertaining to the Lord.]

LETTER CCV.[1]: To Elpidius the bishop.[2]

   Once again I have started the well-beloved presbyter Meletius to carry
my greeting to you. I had positively determined to spare him, on account of
the weakness which he has voluntarily brought upon himself, by bringing his
body into subjection for the sake of the gospel of Christ. But I have
judged it fitting to salute you by the ministry of such men as he is, able
to supply of themselves all the shortcomings of my letter, and to become,
alike to writer and recipient, a kind of living epistle. I am also carrying
out the very strong wish, which he has always had, to see your excellency,
ever since he has had experience of the high qualities you possess. So now
I have besought him to travel to you, and through him I discharge the debt
of the visit I owe you, and beseech you to pray for me and for the Church
of God, that the Lord may grant me deliverance from the injuries of the
enemies of the Gospel, and to pass my life in peace and quiet.
Nevertheless. if you in your wisdom, think it needful that we should travel
to the same spot, and meet the rest of oar fight honourable brother bishops
of the sea board regions, do you yourself point out a suitable place and
time where and when this meeting may take place. Write to our brethren to
the end that each and all may, at the appointed time, leave the business
they may have in hand, and may be able to effect something for the
edification of the Churches of God, do away with the pain which we now
suffer from our mutual suspicions, and establish love, without which the
Lord Himself has ordained that obedience to every commandment must be of
none effect.

LETTER CCVI.[1]: To Elpidius the bishop. Consolatory.

   Now, most of all, do I feel my bodily infirmity, when I see how it
stands in the way of my soul's good. Had matters gone as I hoped, I should
not now be speaking to you by letter or by messenger, but should in my own
person have been paying the debt of affection and enjoying spiritual
advantage face to face. Now, however, I am so situated that I am only too
glad if I am able even to move about in my own country in the necessary
visitation of parishes in my district. But may the Lord grant to you both
strength and a ready will, and to me, in addition to my eager desire,
ability to enjoy your society when I am in the country of Comana. I am
afraid lest your domestic trouble may be some hindrance to you. For I have
learnt of your affliction in the loss of your little boy. To a grandfather
his death cannot but be grievous. On the other hand to a man who has
attained to so high a degree of virtue, and alike from his experience of
this world and his spiritual training knows what human nature is, it is
natural that the removal of those who are near and dear should not he
wholly intolerable. The Lord requires from us what He does not require from
every one. The common mass of mankind lives by habit, but the Christian's
rule of life is the commandment of the Lord, and the example of holy men of
old, whose greatness of soul was, above all, exhibited in adversity. To the
end, then, that you may yourself leave to them that come after you an
example of fortitude and of genuine trust in what we hope for, show that
you are not vanquished by your grief, but are rising above your sorrows,
patient in affliction, and rejoicing in hope. Pray let none of these things
be a hindrance to our hoped for meeting. Children, indeed, are held
blameless on account of their tender age; but you and I are under the
responsibility of serving the Lord, as He commands us, and in all things to
be ready for the administration of the affairs of the Churches. For the due
discharge of that duty the Lord has reserved great rewards for faithful and
wise stewards.

LETTER CCVII.[1]: To the clergy of Neocaesarea.

   You all concur in hating me. To a man you have followed the leader of
the war against me.[2] I was therefore minded to say not a word to any one.
I determined that I would write no friendly letter; that I would start no
communication, but keep my sorrow ill silence to myself. Yet it is wrong to
keep silence in the face of calumny; not that by contradiction we may
vindicate ourselves, but that we may not allow a lie to travel further and
its victims to be harmed. I have therefore thought it necessary to put this
matter also before you all, and to write a letter to you, although, when I
recently wrote to all the presbyterate in common, you did not do me the
honour to send me a reply. Do not, my brethren, gratify the vanity of those
who are filling your minds with pernicious opinions. Do not consent to look
lightly on, when, to your knowledge, God's people are being subverted by
impious teaching. None but Sabellius the Libyan[3] and Marcellus the
Galatian[4] have dared to teach  and write what the leaders of your people
are attempting to bring forward among you as their own private discovery.
They are making a great talk about it, but they are perfectly powerless to
give their sophisms anti fallacies even any colour of truth. In their
harangues against me they shrink from no wickedness, and persistently
refuse to meet me. Why? Is it not because they are afraid of being
convicted for their own wicked opinions? Yes; and in their attacks upon me
they have become so lost to all sense of shame as to invent certain dreams
to my discredit while they falsely accuse my teaching of being pernicious.
Let them take upon their own heads all the visions of the autumn months;
they can fix no blasphemy on me, for in every Church there are many to
testify to the truth.

   2. When they are asked the reason for this furious and truceless war,
they allege psalms and a kind of music varying from the custom which has
obtained among you, and similar pretexts of which they ought to be ashamed.
We are, moreover, accused because we maintain men in the practice of true
religion who have renounced the world and all those cares of this life,
which the Lord likens to thorns that do not allow the word to bring forth
fruit. Men of this kind carry about in the body the deadness of Jesus; they
have taken up their own cross, and are followers of God. I would gladly
give my life if these really were my faults, and if I had men with me
owning me as teacher who had chosen this ascetic life. I hear that virtue
of this kind is to be fount now in Egypt, and there are, peradventure some
men in Palestine whose conversation follows the precepts of the Gospel. I
am told too that some perfect and blessed men are to be found in
Mesopotamia. We, in comparison with the perfect, are children. But if women
also have chosen to live the Gospel life, preferring virginity to wedlock.
leading captive the lust of the flesh, and living in the mourning which is
called blessed, they are blessed in their profession wherever they are to
be found. We, however, have few instances of this to show, for with us
people are still in an elementary stage and are being gradually brought. to
piety. If any charges of disorder are brought against the life of our women
I do not undertake to defend them. One thing, however, I do say and that
is, that these bold hearts, these unbridled mouths are ever fearlessly
uttering what Satan, the father of lies, has hitherto I been unable to say.
I wish you to know that we rejoice to have assemblies of both  men and
women, whose conversation is in  heaven and who have crucified the flesh
with, the affections and lusts thereof; they take no thought for food and
raiment, but remain undisturbed beside their Lord, continuing night and day
in prayer. Their lips speak not of the deeds of men: they sing hymns to God
continually, working with their own hands that they may have to distribute
to them that need.

   3. Now as to the charge relating to the  singing of psalms, whereby my
calumniators  specially scare the simpler folk, my reply is this. The
customs which now obtain are agreeable to those of all the Churches of God.
Among us the people go at night to the house of prayer, and, in distress,
affliction, and continual tears, making confession to God, at last rise
from their prayers and begin to sing psalms. And now, divided into two
parts, they sing antiphonally with one another, thus at once confirming
their study of the Gospels,[1] and at the same time producing for
themselves a heedful temper and a heart free from distraction. Afterwards
they again commit the prelude of the strain to one, and the rest take it
up; and so after passing the night in various psalmody, praying at
intervals as the day begins to dawn, all together, as with one voice and
one heart, raise the psalm of confession to the Lord, each forming for
himself his own expressions of penitence. If it is for these reasons that
you renounce me, you will renounce the Egyptians; you will renounce both
Libyans, Thebans, Palestinians, Arabians, Phoenicians, Syrians, the
dwellers by the Euphrates; in a word all those among whom vigils, prayers,
and common psalmody have been held in honour.

   4. But, it is alleged, these practices were not observed in the time of
the great Gregory. My rejoinder is that even the Litanies[2] which you now
use were not used in his time. I do not say this to find fault with you;
for my prayer would be that every one of you should live in tears and
continual penitence. We, for our part, are always offering supplication for
our sins, but we propitiate our God not as you do, in the words of mere
man, but in the oracles of the Spirit. And what evidence have you that this
custom was not followed in the time of the great Gregory? You have kept
none of his customs up to the present time.[3] Gregory did not cover his
head at prayer. How could he? He was a true disciple of the Apostle who
says, "Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered,
dishonoureth Iris head."[1] And "a man indeed ought not to cover his bead
forasmuch as he is the image of God."[2] Oaths were shunned by Gregory,
that pure soul, worthy of the fellowship of the Holy Ghost, content with
yea and nay, in accordance with the commandment of the Lord Who said, "I
say unto you swear not at all?" [3] Gregory could not bear to call his
brother a fool,[4] for he stood in awe of the threat of the Lord. Passion,
wrath, and bitterness never proceeded out of his mouth. Railing he hated,
because it leads not to the kingdom of heaven. Envy and arrogance had been
shut out of that guiltless sold. He would never have stood at the altar
before being reconciled to his brother. A lie, or any word designed to
slander any one, he abominated, as one who knew that lies come from the
devil, and that the Lord will destroy all that utter a lie.[5] If you have
none of these things, and are clear of all, then are you verily disciples
of the disciple of the Lord. if not, beware lest, in your disputes about
the mode of singing psalms, you are straining at the gnat and setting at
naught the greatest of the commandments.

   I have been driven to use these expressions by the urgency of my
defence, that you may be taught to cast the beam out of your own eyes
before you try to remove other men's motes. Nevertheless, I am conceding
all, although there is nothing that is not searched into before God. Only
let great matters prevail, and do not allow innovations in the fifth to
make themselves heard. Do not disregard the hypostases. Do not deny the
name of Christ. Do not put a wrong meaning on the words of Gregory. If you
do so, as long as I breathe and have the power of utterance, I cannot keep
silence, when I see souls being thus destroyed.

LETTER CCVIII.[6]: To Eulancius.

   You have been long silent, though you have very great power of speech,
and are well trained in the art of conversation and of exhibiting yourself
by your eloquence. Possibly it is Neocaesarea which is the cause of your
not writing to me. I suppose I must take it as a kindness if those who are
there do not remember me, for, as I am informed by those who report what
they hear, the mention made of me is not kind. You, however, used to be one
of those who were disliked for my sake, not one of those who dislike me for
the sake of others. I hope this description will continue to fit you, that
wherever you are you will write to me, and will have kindly thoughts of me,
if you care at all for what is fair and right. It is certainly fair that
those who have been first to show affection should be paid in their own
coin.

LETTER CCIX.[1]: Without address.

   IT is your lot to share my distress, and to do battle on my behalf.
Herein is proof of your manliness. God, who ordains our lives, grants to
those who are capable of sustaining great fights greater opportunity of
winning renown. You truly have risked your own life as a test of your
valour in your friend's behalf, like gold in the furnace. I pray God that
other men may be made better; that you may remain what you are, and that
you will not cease to find fault with me, as you do, anti to charge me with
not writing often to you, as a wrong on my part which does you very great
injury. This is an accusation only made by a friend. Persist in demanding
the payment of such debts. I am not so very unreasonable in paying the
claims of affection.

LETTER CCX.[2]: To the notables of Neocaesarea.

   I am really under no obligation to publish my own mind to you, or to
state the reasons for my present sojourn where I am; it is not my custom to
indulge in self advertisement, nor is the matter worth publicity. I am not,
I think, following my own inclinations; I am answering the challenge of
your leaders. I have always striven to be ignored more earnestly than
popularity hunters strive after notoriety. But, I am told, the ears of
everybody in your town are set a thrilling, while certain tale-mongers,
creators of lies, hired for this very work, are giving you a history of me
and my doings. I therefore do not think that I ought to overlook your being
exposed to the teaching of vile intention and foul tongue; I think that I
am bound to tell you myself in what position I am placed. From my childhood
I have been familiar with this spot, for here I was brought up by my
grandmother;(1) hither I have often retreated, and here I have spent many
years, when endeavouring to escape from the hubbub of public affairs, for
experience has taught me that the quiet and solitude of the spot are
favourable to serious thought. Moreover as my brothers(2) are now living
here, I have gladly retired to this retreat, and have taken a brief
breathing time from the press of the labours that beset me, not as a centre
from which I might give trouble to others, but to indulge my own longing.

   2. Where then is the need of having recourse to dreams and of hiring
their interpreters, and making me matter for talk over the cups at public
entertainments? Had slander been launched against me in any other quarter,
I should have called you to witness to prove what I think, and now I ask
every one of you to remember those old days when I was invited by your city
to take charge of the education of the young, and a deputation of the first
men among you came to see me.(3) Afterwards, when you all crowded round me,
what were you not ready to give? what not to promise? Nevertheless you were
not able to keep me. How then could I, who at that time would not listen
when you invited me, now attempt to thrust myself on you uninvited? How
could I, who when you complimented and admired me, avoided you, have been
intending to court you now that you calumniate me? Nothing of the kind,
sirs; I am not quite so cheap. No man in his senses would go on board a
boat. without a steersman, or get alongside a Church where the men siring
at the helm are themselves stirring up tempest and storm. Whose fault was
it that the town was all full of tumult, when some were running away with
no one after them, and others stealing off when no invader was near, and
all the wizards and dream-tellers were flourishing their bogeys? Whose
fault was it else? Does not every child know that it was the mob-leaders'?
The reasons of their hatred to me it would be bad taste on my part to
recount; but they are quite easy for you to apprehend. When bitterness and
division have come to the last pitch of savagery, and the explanation of
the cause is altogether groundless and ridiculous, then the mental disease
is plain, dangerous indeed to other people's comfort,  but greatly and
personally calamitous to the patient. And there is one charming point about
them. Torn and racked with inward agony as they are, they cannot yet for
very shame speak out about it. The state they are in may be known not only
from their behaviour to me, but from the rest of their conduct. If it were
unknown, it would not much matter. But the veritable cause of their
shunning communication with me may be unperceived by the majority among
you. Listen; and I will tell you.

   3. There is going on among you a movement ruinous to the faith,
disloyal to the apostolical and evangelical dogmas, disloyal too to the
tradition of Gregory the truly great,(1) and of his successors up to the
blessed Musonius, whose teaching is still ringing in your ears.(2) For
those men, who, from fear of confutation, are forging figments against me,
are endeavouring to renew the old mischief of Sabellius, started long ago,
and extinguished by the tradition of the great Gregory. But do you bid
goodbye to those wine-laden heads, bemuddled by the swelling fumes that
mount from their debauch, and from me who am wide awake and from fear of
God cannot keep silence. hear what plague is rife among you. Sabellianism
is Judaism(3) imported into the preaching of the Gospel under the guise of
Christianity. For if a man calls Father Son and Holy Ghost one thing of
many faces,(4) and makes the hypostasis of the three one,(5) what is this
but to deny the everlasting pre-existence of the Only begotten? He denies
too the Lord's sojourn among men in the incarnation,(6) the going down into
hell, the resurrection, the judgment; he denies also the proper operations
of the Spirit. And I hear that even rasher innovations than those of the
foolish Sabellius are now ventured on among you. It is said, and that on
the evidence of ear witnesses, that your clever men go to such an extreme
as to say that there is no tradition of the name of the Only-begotten,
while of the name of the adversary there is; and at this they are highly
delighted and elated, as though it were a discovery of their own. For it is
said, "I came in my Father's name and ye received me not; if another shall
come in his own name, him ye will receive."(1) And because it is said, " Go
ye and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of
the Son, and of the Holy Ghost,"(2) it is obvious, they urge, that the name
is one, for it is not " in the names," but " in the name."

   4. I blush so to write to you, for the men thus guilty are of my own
blood;(3) and I groan for my own soul, in that, like boxers fighting two
men at once, I can only give the truth its proper force by hitting with my
proofs, and knocking down, the errors of doctrine on the right and on the
left. On one side I am attacked by the Anomoean: on the other by the
Sabellian. Do not, I implore you, pay any attention to these abominable and
impotent sophisms. Know that the name of Christ which is above every name
is His being called Son of God, as Peter says, "There is none other name
under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved."(4) And as to the
words "I came in my Father's name," it is to be understood that He so says
describing His Father as origin and cause of Himself.(5) And if it is said
"Go and baptize in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy
Ghost," we must not suppose that here one name is  delivered to us. For
just as he who said  Paul and Silvanus and Timothy mentioned three names,
and coupled them one to the other by the word "and," so He who spoke  of
the name of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost," mentioned three, and united them
by the  conjunction, teaching that with each name must be understood its
own proper meaning; for the names mean things. And no one gifted with even
the smallest particle of it intelligence doubts that the existence
belonging to the things is peculiar and complete in itself. For of Father,
Son, and Holy Ghost there is the same nature and one Godhead; but these are
different names, setting forth to a us the circumscription and exactitude
of the meanings. For unless the meaning of the distinctive qualities of
each be unconfounded, it is impossible for the doxology to be adequately
offered to Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.

   If, however, they deny that they so say, and so teach, my object is
attained. Yet I see that this denial is no easy matter, because of our
having many witnesses who heard these things said. But let bygones be
bygones; let them only be sound now. If they persist in the same old error
I must proclaim your calamity even to other Churches, and get letters
written to you froth more bishops. In my efforts to break down this huge
mass of impiety now gradually and secretly growing, I shall either effect
something towards the object I have in view; or at least my present
testimony will clear me of guilt in the judgment day.

   5. They have already inserted these  expressions in their own writings.
They sent them first to the man of God, Meletius,(1) bishop, and after
receiving from him a suitable reply, like mothers of monsters, ashamed of
their natural deformities, these men themselves brought forth and bring up
their disgusting offspring in appropriate darkness. They made an attempt
too by letter on my dear friend Anthimus, bishop of Tyana,(2) on the ground
that Gregory had said in his exposition of the faith(3) that Father and Son
are in thought two, but in hypostasis one.(4) The men who congratulate
themselves on the subtilty of their intelligence could not perceive that
this is said not in reference to dogmatic opinion, but in controversy with
Aelian. And in this dispute there are not a few copyists' blunders, as,
please God, I shall shew in the case of the actual expressions used. But in
his endeavour to convince the heathen, he deemed it needless to be nice
about the words he employed; he judged it wiser sometimes to make
concessions to the character of the subject who was being persuaded, so as
not to run counter to the opportunity given him. This explains how it is
that you may find there many expressions which now give great support to
the heretics, as for instance "creature"(1) and "thing made"(2) and the
like. But those who ignorantly criticise these writings refer to the
question of the Godhead much that is said in reference to the conjunction
with man; as is the case with this passage which they are hawking about.
For it is indispensable to have clear understanding that, as he who fails
to confess the community of the essence or substance falls into polytheism,
so he who refuses to grant the distinction of the hypostases is carried
away into Judaism. For we must keep oar mind stayed, so to say, on certain
underlying subject matter, and, by forming a clear impression of its
distinguishing lines, so arrive at the end desired. For suppose we do not
bethink us of the Fatherhood, nor bear in mind Him of whom this distinctive
quality is marked off, how can we take in the idea of God the Father? For
merely to enumerate the differences of Persons(3) is insufficient; we must
confess each Person(4) to have a natural existence in real hypostasis. Now
Sabellius did not even deprecate the formation of the persons without
hypostasis, saying as he did that the same God, being one in matter,(5) was
metamorphosed as the need of the moment required, and spoken of now as
Father, now as Son, and now as Holy Ghost. The inventors of this unnamed
heresy are renewing the old long extinguished error; those, I mean, who are
repudiating the hypostases, and denying the name of the Son of God. They
must give over uttering iniquity against God,(6) or they will have to wail
with them that deny the Christ.

   6. I have felt compelled to write to you in these terms, that you, may
be on your guard against the mischief arising from bad teaching. If we may
indeed liken pernicious teachings to poisonous drugs, as your dream-tellers
have it. these doctrines are hemlock and monkshood, or any other deadly to
man. It is these that destroy souls; not my words, as this shrieking
drunken scum, full of the fancies of their condition, make out. If they bad
any sense they ought to know that in souls, pure and cleansed from all
defilement, the prophetic gift shines clear. In a foul mirror you cannot
see what the reflexion is, neither can a soul preoccupied with cares of
this life, and darkened with the passions of the lust of the flesh, receive
the rays of the Holy Ghost. Every dream is not a prophecy, as says
Zechariah. " The Lord shall make bright clouds, and give them showers of
rain, ... for the idols have spoken vanity and the diviners have told false
dreams."(1) Those who, as Isaiah says, dream and love to sleep in their
bed(2) forget that an operation of error is sent to " the children of
disobedience."(3) And there is a lying spirit, which arose in false
prophecies, and deceived Ahab.(4) Knowing this they ought not to have been
so lifted up as to ascribe the gift of prophecy to themselves. They are
shewn to fall far short even of the case of the seer Balaam; for Balaam
when invited by the king of Moab with mighty bribes brooked not to utter a
word beyond the will of God, nor to curse Israel whom the Lord cursed
not.(5) If then their sleep-fancies do not tally with the commandments of
the Lord, let them be content with the Gospels. The Gospels need no dreams
to add to their credit. The Lord has sent His peace to us, and left us a
new commandment, to love one another, but dreams bring strife and division
and destruction of love. Let them therefore not give occasion to the devil
to attack their souls in sleep; nor make their imaginations of more
authority than the instruction of salvation.

LETTER CCXI.(6): To Olympius.(7)

   TRULY when I read your excellency's letter I felt unwonted pleasure and
cheerfulness; and when I met your well-beloved sons, I seemed to behold
yourself. They found me in the deepest affliction, but they so behaved as
to make me forget the hemlock, which your dreamers and dream mongers are
carrying about to my hurt, to please the people who have hired them. Some
letters I have already sent; others, if you like, shall  follow. I only
hope that they may be of some advantage to the recipients.

LETTER CCXII.(1): To Hilarius.(2)

   1. You can imagine what I felt, and in what state of mind I was, when I
came to Dazimon and found that you had left a few days before my arrival.
From my boyhood I have held you in admiration, and, therefore, ever since
our old school days, have placed a high value on intercourse with you. But
another reason for my doing so is that nothing is so precious now as a soul
that loves the, truth, and is gifted with a sound judgment in practical
affairs. This, I think, is to be found m you. I see most men, as in the
hippodrome, divided into factions, some for one side and some for another,
and shouting with their parties. But you are above fear, flattery, and
every ignoble sentiment, and so naturally look at truth with an
unprejudiced eye. And I see that you are deeply interested in the affairs
of the Churches, about which you have sent me a letter, as you have said in
your last. I should like to know who took charge of the conveyance of this
earlier epistle, that I may know who has wronged me by its loss. No letter
from you on this subject has yet reached me.

   2. How much, then, would I not have given to meet you, that I might
tell you all my troubles? When one is in pain it is, as you know, some
alleviation, even to describe it. How gladly would I have answered your
questions, not trusting to lifeless letters, but in my own person,
narrating each particular. The persuasive force of living words is more
efficient and they are not so susceptible as letters to attack and to
misrepresentation. For now no one has left anything untried, and the very
men in whom I put the greatest confidence, men, who when I saw them among
others, I used to think something more than human, have received documents
written by some one, and have sent them on, whatever they are, as mine, and
on their account are calumniating me to the brethren as though there is
nothing now that pious and faithful men ought to hold in greater abhorrence
than my name. From the beginning it has been my object to live unknown, to
a degree not reached by any  one who has considered human infirmity; but
now, just as though on the other hand it had been my purpose to make myself
notorious to the world, I have been talked about all over the earth, and I
may add all over the sea too. For men, who go to the last limit of impiety,
and are  introducing into the Churches the godless opinion of
Unlikeness,(1) are waging war against me. Those too who hold the via
media.(2) as they think, and, though they start from the same principles,
do not follow out their logical consequences, because they are so opposed
to the view of the majority, are equally hostile to me, overwhelming me to
the utmost of their ability with their reproaches, and abstaining from no
insidious attacks against me. But the Lord has made their endeavours vain.

   Is not this a grievous state of things? Must it not make my life
painful? I have at all events one consolation in my troubles, my bodily
infirmity. This I am sure will not suffer me to remain much longer in this
miserable life. No more on this point. You too I exhort, in your bodily
infirmity. to bear yourself bravely and worthy of the God Who has called
us. If He sees us accepting our present circumstances with thanksgiving, He
will either put away our troubles as He did Job's, or will requite us with
the glorious crowns of patience in the life to come.

LETTER CCXIII.(3): Without address.

   1. MAY the Lord, Who has brought me prompt help in my afflictions,
grant you the help of the refreshment wherewith you have refreshed me by
writing to me, rewarding you for your consolation of my humble self with
the real and great gladness of the Spirit. For I was indeed downcast in
soul when I saw in a great multitude the almost brutish and unreasonable
insensibility of the people, and the inveterate and ineradicable
unsatisfactoriness of their leaders. But I saw your letter; I saw the
treasure of love which it contained; then I knew that He Who ordains all
our lives had made some sweet consolation shine on me in the bitterness of
my life. I therefore salute your holiness in return, and exhort you, as is
my wont, not to cease to pray for my unhappy life, that I may never,
drowned in the unrealities of this world, forget God, "who raiseth up the
poor out of the dust;"(1) that I may never be lifted up with pride and fall
into the condemnation of the devil;(2) that I may never be found by the
Lord neglectful of my stewardship and asleep; never discharging it amiss,
and wounding the conscience of my fellow-servants;(3) and, never companying
with the drunken, suffer the pains threatened in God's just judgment
against wicked stewards. I beseech you, therefore, in all your prayers to
pray God that I may be watchful in all things; that I may be no shame or
disgrace to the name of Christ, in the revelation of the secrets of my
heart, in the great day of the appearing of our Saviour Jesus Christ.

   2. Know then that I am expecting to be summoned by the wickedness of
the heretics to the court, in the name of peace. Learn too that on being so
informed, this bishop(4) wrote to me to hasten to Mesopotamia, and, after
assembling together those who in that country are of like sentiments with
us, and are strengthening the state of the Church, to travel in their
company to the emperor. But perhaps my health will not be good enough to
allow me to undertake a journey in the winter. Indeed, hitherto I have not
thought the matter pressing, unless yon advise it. I shall therefore await
your counsel that my mind may be made up. Lose no time then, I beg you, in
making known to me, by means of one of our trusty brethren, what course
seems best to the divinely guided intelligence of your excellency.

LETTER CCXIV.(5): To Count Terentius.(6)

   1. WHEN I heard that your excellency had again been compelled to take
part in public affairs, I was straightway distressed (for the truth must be
told) at the thought of how contrary to your mind it must be that you after
once giving up the anxieties of official life, and allowing yourself
leisure for the care of your soul, should again be forced back into your
old career. But then I bethought me that peradventure the  Lord has
ordained that your lordship should again appear in public from this wish to
grant the boon of one alleviation for the countless pains which now beset
the Church in our part of the world. I am, moreover, cheered by the thought
that I am about to meet your excellency once again before I depart this
life.

   2. But a further rumour has reached me that you are in Antioch, and are
transacting the business in hand with the chief authorities. And, besides
this, I have heard that the brethren who are of the party of Paulinus are
entering on some discussion with your excellency on the subject of union
with us; and by "us" I mean those who are supporters of the blessed man of
God, Meletius.(1) I hear, moreover, that the Paulinians are carrying about
a letter of the Westerns,(2) assigning to them the episcopate of the Church
in Antioch, but speaking under a false impression of Meletius, the
admirable bishop of the true Church of God. I am not astonished at this.
They(3) are totally ignorant of what is going on here; the others, though
they might be supposed to know, give an account to them in which party is
put before truth; and it is only what one might expect that they should
either be ignorant of the truth, or should even endeavour to conceal the
reasons which led the blessed Bishop Athanasius to write to Paulinus. But
your excellency has on the spot those who are able to tell you accurately
what passed between the bishops in the reign of Jovian, and from them I
beseech you to get information.(4) I accuse no one; I pray that I may have
love to all, and " especially unto them who are of the household of
faith;"(5) and therefore I congratulate those who have received the letter
from Rome. And, although it is a grand testimony in their favour, I only
hope it is true and confirmed by facts. But I shall never be able to
persuade myself on these grounds to ignore Meletius, or to forget the
Church which is under him, or to treat as small, and of little importance
to the true religion, the questions which originated the division. I shall
never consent to give in, merely because somebody is very much elated at
receiving a letter from men.(1) Even if it had come down from heaven
itself, but he does not agree with the sound doctrine of the faith, I
cannot look upon him as in communion with the saints.

   3. Consider well, my excellent friend, that the falsifiers of the
truth, who have introduced the Arian schism as an innovation on the sound
faith of the Fathers, advance no other reason for refusing to accept the
pious opinion of the Fathers than the meaning of the homoousion which they
hold in their wickedness, and to the slander of the whole faith, alleging
our contention to be that the Son is consubstantial in hypostasis. If we
give them any opportunity by our being carried away by men who propound
these sentiments and their like, rather from simplicity than from
malevolence, there is nothing to prevent oar giving them an unanswerable
ground of argument against ourselves and confirming the heresy of those
whose one end is in all their utterances about the Church, not so much to
establish their own position as to calumniate mine. What more serious
calumny could there be? What better calculated to disturb the faith of the
majority than that some of us could be shewn to assert that there is one
hypostasis of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost? We distinctly lay down that
there is a difference of Persons; but this statement was anticipated by
Sabellius, who affirms that God is one by hypostasis, but is described by
Scripture in different Persons, according to the requirements of each
individual case; sometimes under the name of Father, when there is occasion
for this Person; sometimes under the name of Son when there is a descent to
human interests or any of the operations of the oeconomy;(2) and sometimes
under the Person of Spirit when the occasion demands such phraseology. If,
then, any among us are shewn to assert that Father, Son and Holy Ghost are
one in substance,(3) while we maintain the three perfect Persons, how shall
we escape giving clear and incontrovertible proof of the truth of what is
being asserted about us?

   4. The non-identity of hypostasis and ousia is, I take it, suggested
even by our western brethren, where, from a suspicion of tile inadequacy of
their own language, they have given the word ousia in the Greek, to the end
that any possible difference of meaning might be preserved in the clear and
unconfounded distinction of terms. If you ask me to state shortly my own
view, I shall state that ousia has the same relation to hypostasis as the
common has to the particular. Every one of us both shares in existence by
the common term of essence (ousia) and by his own properties is such an one
and such an one. In the same manner, in the matter in question, the term
ousia is common, like goodness, or Godhead, or any similar attribute; while
hypostasis is contemplated in the special property of Fatherhood, Sonship,
or the power to sanctify. If then they describe the Persons as being
without hypostasis,(1) the statement is per se absurd; but if they concede
that the Persons exist in real hypostasis, as they acknowledge, let them so
reckon them that the principle of the homoousion may be preserved in the
unity of the Godhead, and that the doctrine preached may be the recognition
of true religion, of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, in the perfect and
complete hypostasis of each of the Persons named. Nevertheless, there is
one point which I should like to have pressed on your excellency, that you
and all who like you care for the truth, and honour the combatant in the
cause of true religion, ought to wait for the lead to be taken in bringing
about this union and peace by the foremost authorities in the Church, whom
I count as pillars and foundations of the truth and of the Church, and
reverence all the more because they have been sent away for punishment, and
have been exiled far from home. Keep yourself, I implore you, clear of
prejudice, that in you, whom God has given me as a staff and support in all
things, I may be able to find rest.(2)

LETTER CCXV.(3): To the Presbyter Dorotheus.

   I TOOK the earliest opportunity of writing to the most admirable Count
Terentius, thinking it better to write to him on the subject in hand by
means of strangers, and being anxious that oar very dear brother Acacius
shall not be inconvenienced by any delay. I have therefore given my letter
to the government treasurer, who is travelling by the imperial post, and I
have charged him to shew the letter to you first. I cannot understand how
it is that no one has told you that the road to Rome is wholly
impracticable in winter, the country between Constantinople and out' own
regions being full of enemies. If the route by sea must be taken, the
season will be favourable; if indeed my God-beloved brother Gregory(1)
consents to the voyage and to the commission concerning these matters. For
my own part, I do not know who can go  with him, and am aware that he is
quite inexperienced in ecclesiastical affairs. With a man of kindly
character he may get on very well, and be treated with respect, but what
possible good could accrue to the cause by communication between a man
proud and exalted, and therefore quite unable to hear those who preach the
truth to him from a lower standpoint, and a man like my brother, to whom
anything like mean servility is unknown ?

LETTER CCXVI.(2): To Meletius, bishop of Antioch.

   MANY other(3) journeys have taken me from home. I have been as far as
Pisidia to settle the matters concerning the brethren  in Isauria in
concert with the Pisidian bishops. Thence I journeyed into Pontus, for
Eustathius had caused no small disturbance at Dazimon, and had caused there
a considerable secession from our church. I even went as far as the home of
my brother Peter,(4) and, as this is not far from Neocaesarea, there was
occasion of considerable trouble to the Neocaesareans, and of much rudeness
to myself. Some men fled when no one was in pursuit. And I was supposed to
be intruding uninvited, simply to get compliments from the folk there. As
soon as I got home, after contracting a severe illness from the bad weather
and my anxieties. I straightway received a letter from the East to tell me
that Paulinus had had certain letters from the West addressed to him, in
acknowledgement of a sort of higher claim; and that the Antiochene rebels
were vastly elated by them, and were next preparing a form of creed. and
offering to make its terms a condition of union with our Church. Besides
all this it was reported to me that they had seduced to their faction that
most excellent man Terentius. I wrote to him at once as forcibly as I
could. to induce him to pause; and I tried to point out their
disingenuousness.

LETTER CCXVII: To Amphilochius, the Canons.(1)

   ON my return from a long journey (for I have been into Pontus on
ecclesiastical business, and to visit my relations) with my body weak and
ill, and my spirits considerably broken, I took your reverence's letter
into my hand. No sooner did I receive the tokens of that voice which to me
is of all voices the sweetest, and of that hand that I love so well, than I
forgot all my troubles. And if I was made so much more cheerful by the
receipt of your letter, you ought to be able to conjecture at what value I
price your actual presence. May this be granted me by the Holy One,
whenever it may be convenient to you and you yourself send me an
invitation. And if you were to come to the house at Euphemias it would
indeed be pleasant for me to meet you, escaping from my vexations here, and
hastening to your unfeigned affection. Possibly also for other reasons I
may be compelled to go as far as Nazianzus by the sudden departure of the
very God-beloved bishop Gregory. How or why this has come to pass, so far I
have no information.(2) The man about whom I had spoken to your excellency,
and whom you expected to be ready by this time, has, you must know, fallen
ill of a lingering disease, and is moreover now suffering from an affection
of the eyes, arising from his old complaint and from the illness which has
now befallen him, and he is quite unfit to do any work. I have no one else
with me. It is consequently better, although the matter was left by them to
me, for some one to be put forward by them. And indeed one cannot but think
that the expressions were used merely as a necessary form, and that what
they really wished was what they originally requested, that the person
selected for the leadership should be one of themselves. If there is any
one of the lately baptized,(3) whether Macedonius approve or not, let him
be appointed. You will instruct him in his duties, the Lord, Who in all
things cooperates with you, granting you His grace for this work also.

   LI. As to the clergy, the Canons have enjoined without making any
distinction that one penalty is assigned for the lapsed,--ejection from the
ministry, whether they be in orders(1) or remain ill the ministry which is
conferred without imposition of hands.

   LII. The woman who has given birth to a child and abandoned it in the
road, if she was able to save it and neglected it, or thought by this means
to hide her sin, or was moved by some brutal and inhuman motive, is to be
judged as in a case of murder. If, on the other hand, she was unable to
provide for it. and the child perish from exposure and want of the
necessities of life, the mother is to be pardoned.

   LIII. The widowed slave is not guilty of a serious fall if she adopts a
second marriage under colour of rape. She is not on tiffs ground open to
accusation. It is rather the object than the pretext which mast be taken
into account, but it is clear that she is exposed to the punishment of
digamy.(2)

   LIV. I know that I have already written to your reverence, so far as I
can, on the distinctions to be observed in cases of involuntary
homicide,(3) and on this point I can say no more. It rests with your
intelligence to increase or lessen the severity of the punishment as each
individual case may require.

   LV. Assailants of robbers, if they are outside, are prohibited from the
communion of the good thing.(4) If they are clerics they are degraded from
their orders. For, it is said. "All they that take the sword shall perish
with the sword."

   LVI. The intentional homicide, who has afterwards repented, will be
excommunicated from the sacrament(6) for twenty years. The twenty years
will be appointed for him as follows: for four he ought to weep, standing
outside the door of the house of prayer, beseeching the faithful as they
enter in to offer prayer in his behalf, and confessing his own sin. After
four years he will be admitted among the hearers, and during five years
will go out with them. During seven years he will go out with the
kneelers,(1) praying. During four years he will only stand with the
faithful, and will not take part in the oblation. On the completion of this
period he will be admitted to participation of the sacrament.

   LVII. The unintentional homicide will be excluded for ten years from
the sacrament. The ten years will be arranged as follows: For two years he
will weep, for three years he will continue among the hearers; for four he
will be a kneeler; and for one he will only stand. Then he will be admitted
to the holy rites.

   LVIII. The adulterer will be excluded from the sacrament for fifteen
years. During four he will be a weeper, and during five a hearer, during
four a kneeler, and for two a slander without communion.

   LIX. The fornicator will not be admitted to participation in the
sacrament for seven years;(2) weeping two hearing two kneeling two, and
standing one: in the eighth he will be received into communion.

   LX. The woman who has professed virginity and broken her promise will
complete the time appointed in the case of adultery in her continence.(1)
The same rule will be observed in the case of men who have professed a
solitary life and who lapse.

   LXI. The thief, if he have repented of his own accord and charged
himself, shall  only be prohibited from partaking of the sacrament for a
year; if he be convicted, for two years. The period shall be divided
between kneeling and standing. Then let him  be held worthy of communion.

   LXII. He who is guilty of unseemliness with males will be under
discipline for the same time as adulterers.

   LXIII. He who confesses his iniquity in the case of brutes shall
observe the same time in penance.

   LXIV. Perjurers shall be excommunicated for ten years; weeping for two,
hearing for three, kneeling for four, and standing only during one year;
then they shall be held worthy of communion.

   LXV. He who confesses-magic or sorcery shall do penance for the time of
murder, and shall be treated in the same manner as  he who convicts himself
of this sin.

   LXVI. The tomb breaker shall be excommunicated for ten years, weeping
for two, hearing for three, kneeling for four, standing for one, then he
shall be admitted.

   LXVII. Incest with a sister shall incur penance for the same time as
murder.

  LXVIII.The union of kindred within the prohibited degrees of marriage,
if detected as having taken place in acts of sin, shall receive the
punishment of adultery.(2)

   LXIX. The Reader who has intercourse with his betrothed before
marriage, shall be allowed to read after a year's suspension, remaining
without advancement. If he has had secret intercourse without betrothal, he
shall be deposed from his ministry. So too the minister.(3)

   LXX. The deacon who has been polluted in lips, and has confessed his
commission of this sin, shall be removed from his ministry. But he shall be
permitted to partake of the sacrament together with the deacons. The same
holds good in the case of a priest. If any one be detected in a more
serious sin, whatever be his degree, he shall be deposed.(1)

   LXXI. Whoever is aware of the commission of any one of the
aforementioned sins, and is convicted without having confessed, shall be
under punishment for the same space of time as the actual perpetrator.

   LXXII. He who has entrusted himself(2) to soothsayers, or any such
persons, shall be under discipline for the same time as the homicide.

   LXXIII. He who has denied Christ, and sinned against the mystery of
salvation, ought to weep all his life long, and is bound to remain in
penitence, being deemed worthy of the sacrament in the hour of death,
through faith in the mercy of God.

   LXXIV. If, however, each man who has committed the former sins is made
good, through penitence.(3) he to whom is committed by the loving-kindness
of God the power of loosing and binding(1) will not be deserving of
condemnation, if he become less severe, as he beholds the exceeding
greatness of the penitence of the sinner, so as to lessen the period of
punishment, for the history in the Scriptures informs us that all who
exercise penitence(2) with greater zeal quickly receive the loving-kindness
of God.(3)

   LXXV. The man who has been polluted with Iris own sister, either on the
father's or the mother's side, must not be allowed to enter the house of
prayer, until he has given up his iniquitous and unlawful conduct. And,
after he has come to a sense of that fearful sin, let him weep for three
years standing at the door of the house of prayer, and entreating the
people as they go in to prayer that each and all will mercifully offer on
his behalf their prayers with earnestness to the Lord. After this let him
be received for another period of three years to hearing alone, and while
hearing the Scriptures and the instruction, let him be expelled and not be
admitted to prayer. Afterwards, if he has asked it with tears and has
fallen before the Lord with contrition of heart and great humiliation, let
kneeling be accorded to him during other three years. Thus, when he shall
have worthily shown the fruits of repentance, let him be received in the
tenth year to the prayer of the faithful without oblation; and after
standing with the faithful in prayer for two years, then, and not till
then, let him be held worthy of the communion of the good thing.

  LXXVI. The same rule applies to those who take their own daughters in
law.

   LXXVII. He who abandons the wife, lawfully trailed to him, is subject
by the sentence of the Lord to the penalty of adultery. But it has been
laid down as a canon by our Fathers that such sinners should weep for a
year, be hearers for two years, in kneeling for three years, stand with the
faithful in the seventh; and thus be deemed worthy of the oblation, if they
have repented with tears.(1)

   LXXVIII. Let the same rule hold good in the case of those who marry two
sisters, although at different times.(2)

   LXXIX. Men who rage after their stepmothers are subject to the same
canon as those who rage after their sisters.(3)

   LXXX. On polygamy the Fathers are silent, as being brutish and
altogether inhuman. The sin seems to me worse than fornication. It is
therefore reasonable that such sinners should be subject to the canons;
namely a year's weeping, three years kneeling and then reception.(4)

   LXXXI. During the invasion of the barbarians many men have sworn
heathen oaths, tasted things unlawfully offered them in magic temples and
so have broken their faith in God. Let regulations be made in the case of
these men in accordance with the canons laid down by our Fathers.(5) Those
who have endured grievous tortures and have been forced to denial, through
inability to sustain the anguish, may be excluded for three years, hearers
for two, kneelers for three, and so be received into communion. Those who
have abandoned their faith in God, laying hands on the tables of the demons
and swearing heathen oaths, without under going great violence, should be
excluded for three years, hearers for two. When they have prayed for three
years as kneelers, and have stood other three with the faithful in
supplication, then let them be received into the communion of the good
thing.

   LXXXII. As to perjurers, if they have broken their oaths under violent
compulsion, they are under lighter penalties and may therefore be received
after six years. If they break their faith without compulsion, let them be
weepers for two years, hearers for three, pray as kneelers for five, during
two be received into the communion of prayer, without oblation, and so at
last, after giving proof of due repentance, they shall be restored to the
communion of the body of Christ.

   LXXXIII. Consulters of soothsayers and they who follow heathen customs,
or bring persons into their houses to discover remedies and to effect
purification, should fall under the canon of six years. After Weeping a
year, hearing a year, kneeling for three years and standing with the
faithful for a year so let them be received.

   LXXXIV. I write all this with a view to testing the fruits of
repentance.(1) I do not decide such matters absolutely by time, but I give
heed to the manner of penance. If men are in a state in which they find it
hard to be weaned from their own ways and choose rather to serve the
pleasures of the flesh than to serve the Lord, and refuse to accept the
Gospel life, there is no common ground between me and them. In the midst of
a disobedient and gainsaying people I have been taught to hear the words "
Save thy own soul."(2) Do not then let us consent to perish together with
such sinners. Let us fear the awful judgment. Let us keep before our eyes
the terrible day of the retribution of the Lord. Let us not consent to
perish in other men's sins, for if the terrors of the Lord have not taught
us, if so great calamities have not brought us to feel that it is A because
of our iniquity that the Lord has abandoned us, and given us into the hands
of barbarians, that the people have been led, captive before our foes and
given over to dispersion, because the bearers of Christ's name have dared
such deeds; if they have not known nor understood that it is for these
reasons that the wrath of God has come upon us, what common ground of
argument have I with them?

   But we ought to testify to them day and night, alike in public and in
private. Let us not consent to be drawn away with them in their wickedness.
Let us above all pray that we may do them good, and rescue them from the
snare of the evil one. If we cannot do this, let us at all events do our
best to save our own souls from everlasting damnation,

LETTER CCXVIII.(1): To Amphilochius, bishop of Iconium.

   BROTHER AELIANUS has himself completed the business concerning which he
came. and has stood in neeed  of no aid from me. l owe him, however, double
thanks, both for bringing me a letter from your reverence and tot affording
me an opportunity of writing to you. By him, therefore, I salute your true
and unfeigned love, and beseech you to pray for me more than ever now, when
I stand in such need of the aid of your prayers. My health has suffered
terribly from the journey to Pontus and my sickness is unendurable. One
thing I have long been anxious to make known to you. I do not mean to say
that I have been so affected by any other cause as to forget it, but now I
wish to put you in mind to send some good man into Lycia, to enquire who
are of the right faith, for peradventure they ought not to be neglected, if
indeed the report is true, which has been brought to me by a pious
traveller from thence, that they have become altogether alienated from the
opinion of the Asiani(2) and wish to embrace communions with us. If any one
is to go let him enquire at Corydala(3) for Alexander, the late monk, the
bishop; at Limyra(4) for Diotimus, and at Myra(5) for Tatianus, Polemo,(6)
and Macarius presbyters; at Patara(7) for Eudemus,(8) the bishop; at
Telmessus(9) for Hilarius, the bishop: at Phelus for Lallianus, the bishop.
Of these and of more besides I have been informed that they are sound in
the faith, and I have been grateful to God that even any in the Asian
region should be clear of the heretic's pest. If, then, it be possible, let
us in the meanwhile make personal enquiry about them. When we have obtained
information I am for writing a letter, and am anxious to invite one of them
to meet me. God grant that all may go well with that Church at Iconium,
which is so dear to me. Through you I salute all the honourable clergy and
all who are associated with your reverence.

LETTER CCXIX.(1): To the clergy of Samosata.

   THE Lord ordereth "all things in measure and weight,"(2) and brings on
us the temptations which do not exceed our power to endure them,(3) but
tests all that fight in the cause of true religion by affliction, not
suffering them to  be tempted above that they are able to bear.(4) He gives
tears to drink in great measure(5) to all who ought to show whether in
their affections they are preserving their gratitude to Him. Especially in
His dispensation concerning you has He shown His loving-kindness, not
suffering such a persecution to be brought on you by your enemies as might
turn some of you aside, or cause you to swerve from the faith of Christ. He
has matched you with adversaries who are of small importance and easy to be
repelled, and has prepared the prize for your patience in your victory over
them. But the common enemy of our life, who, in his  wiles, strives against
the goodness of God, because he has seen that, like a strong wall, you are
despising attack from without. has devised, as I hear, that there should
arise among yourselves mutual offences and quarrels. These indeed, at the
outset, are insignificant and easy of cure; as time goes on, however, they
are increased by contention and are wont to result in irremediable
mischief.(6) I have, therefore, undertaken to exhort you by this letter.
Had it been possible, I would have come myself and supplicated you in
person. Butt this is prevented by present circumstances, and so, in lieu of
supplication, I hold out this letter to you, that you may respect my
entreaty, may put a stop to your mutual rivalries, and may soon send me the
good news that all cause of offence among you is at an end.

   2. I am very anxious that you should know that be is great before God
who humbly submits to his neighbour and submits to charges against himself,
without having cause for shame, even though they are not  true, that he may
bring the great blessing of peace upon God's Church.

   I hope that there will arise among you a friendly rivalry, as to who
shall first be worthy of being called God's son, after winning this rank
for himself because of his being a peacemaker. A letter has also been
written to you by your very God-beloved bishop as to the course which you
ought to pursue. He will write again what it belongs to him to say. But I
too, because of its having been already allowed me to be near you, cannot
disregard your position. So on the arrival of the very devout brother
Theodorus the sub-deacon, and his report that your Church is in distress
and disturbance, being deeply grieved and much pained at heart, I could not
endure to keep silence. I implore you to fling away all controversy with
one another, and to make peace, that you may avoid giving pleasure to you
opponents and destroying the boast of the Church, which is now noised
abroad throughout the world, that you all, as you are ruled by one soul and
heart, so live in one body. Through your reverences I salute all the people
of God, both those in rank and office and the rest of the clergy. I exhort
you to keep your old character. I can ask for nothing more than this
because by the exhibition of your good works you have anticipated and made
impossible any improvement on them.

LETTER CCXX.(1): To the Beraeans.(2)

   THE Lord has given great consolation to all who are deprived of
personal intercourse in allowing them to communicate by letter. By this
means, it is true, we cannot learn the express image of the body, but we
can learn the disposition of the very soul. Thus on the present occasion,
when I had received the letter of your reverences, I at the same moment
recognised you, and took your love towards me into my heart, and needed no
long time to create intimacy with you. The disposition shewn in your letter
was quite enough to enkindle in me affection for the beauty of your soul.
And, besides your letter, excellent as it was, I had a yet plainer proof of
how things are with you from the amiability of the brethren who have been
the means of communication between us. The well-beloved and reverend
presbyter Acacius, has told me much in addition to what you have written,
and has brought before my eyes the conflict you have to keep up day by day,
and the stoutness of the stand you are making for the true religion. He has
thus so moved my admiration, and roused in me so earnest a desire of
enjoying the good qualities in you, that I do pray the Lord that a time may
come when I may know you and yours by personal experience. He has told me
of the exactitude of those of you who are entrusted with the ministry of
the altar, and moreover of the harmonious agreement of all the people, and
the generous character and genuine love towards God of the magistrates and
chief men of your city. I consequently congratulate the Church on
consisting of such members, and pray that spiritual peace may be given to
you in yet greater abundance, to the end (hat in quieter times you may
derive enjoyment from your labours in the day of affliction. For sufferings
that are painful while they are being experienced are naturally often
remembered with pleasure. For the present I beseech you not to faint. Do
not despair because your troubles follow so closely one upon another. Your
crowns are near: the help of the Lord is near. Do not let all you have
hitherto undergone go l for nothing; do not nullify a struggle which has
been famous over all the world. Human life is but of brief duration. " All
flesh is grass, and all the goodliness thereof is as the flower of the
field. ... The grass withereth, tile flower fadeth; but the word of our God
shall stand for ever."(1) Let us hold fast to the commandment that abideth,
and despise the unreality that passeth away. Many Churches have been
cheered by your example. In calling new champions into the field you have
won for yourselves a great reward, though you knew it not. The Giver of the
prize is rich. and is able to reward you not unworthily for your brave
deeds.

LETTER CCXXI.(2): To the Beraeans.

   You were previously known to me, my dear friends, by your far-famed
piety, and by the crown won by your confession in Christ. Peradventure one
of you may ask in reply who can have carried these tidings of us so far?
The Lord Himself; for He puts His worshippers like a lamp on a lamp-stand,
and makes them shine throughout tile whole world. Are not winners in the
games wont to be made famous by the prize of victory, and craftsmen by the
skilful design of their work? Shall the memory of these and others like
them abide for ever unforgotten, and shall not Christ's worshippers
concerning whom the Lord says Himself, Them that honour me I will honour,
be made famous and glorious by Him before all? Shall He not display the
brightness of their radiant splendour as He does the beams of the sun? But
I have been moved to greater longing for you by the letter which you have
been good enough to send me, a letter in which, above and beyond your
former efforts on behalf of the truth, yon have been yet more lavish of
your abounding and vigorous zeal for the true faith. In all this I rejoice
with you, and I pray with you that the God of the universe, Whose is the
struggle and the arena, .and Who gives the crown, may fill you with
enthusiasm, may make your souls strong, and make your work such as to meet
with His divine approval.

LETTER CCXXII.(1): To the people of Chalcis.(2)

   THE letter of your reverences came upon me in an hour affliction like
water poured into the mouths of racehorses, inhaling dust with each eager
breath at high noontide in the middle of the course. Beset by trial after
trial, I breathed again, at once cheered by your words and invigorated by
the thought of your struggles to meet that which is before me with
unflinching courage. For the conflagration which has devoured a great part
of the East is already advancing by slow degrees into our own
neighbourhood, and after burning everything round about us is trying to
reach even the Churches in Cappadocia, already moved to tears by the smoke
that rises from the ruins of our neighbours' homes.(3) The flames have
almost reached me. May the Lord divert them by the breath of His mouth, and
stay this wicked fire. Who is such a coward, so unmanly, so untried in the
athlete's struggles, as not to be nerved to the fight by your cheers, and
pray to be hailed victor at your side? You have been the first to step into
the arena of true religion; you have beaten off many an attack in bouts
with the heretics; you have borne the strong hot wind(1) of trial, both you
who are leaders of the Church, to whom has been the ministry of the altar,
and every individual of the laity, including those of higher rank. For this
in you is specially admirable and worthy of all praise, that you are all
one in the Lord. some of you leaders in the march to what is good, others
willingly following. It is for this reason that you are too strong for the
attack of your assailants, and allow no hold to your antagonists in any one
of your members, wherefore day and night I pray the King of the ages to
preserve the people in the integrity of their faith, and for them to
preserve the clergy, like a head unharmed at the top, exercising its own
watchful forethought for every portion of the body underneath. For while
the eyes discharge their functions, the hands can do their work as they
ought, the feet can move without tripping, and no part of the body is
deprived of due care. I beseech you, then, to cling to one another, as you
are doing and as you will do. I beseech you who are entrusted with the care
of souls to keep each and all together, and to cherish them like beloved
children. I beseech the people to continue to show you the respect and
honour due to fathers, that in the goodly order of your Church you may keep
your strength and the foundation of your faith in Christ; that God's name
may be glorified and the good gift of love increase and abound. May I, as I
hear of you, rejoice in your progress in God. If I am still bidden to
sojourn in the flesh in this world, may I one day see you in the peace of
God. If I be now summoned to depart this life, may I see you in the radiant
glory of the saints, together with all them who are accounted worthy
through patience and showing forth of good works, with crowns upon your
heads.

LETTER CCXXIII.(2): Against Eustathius of Sebasteia.(3)

   1. THERE is a time to keep silence and a time to speak, (4) is the
saying of the Preacher. Time enough has been given to silence, and now the
time has come to open my mouth for the publication of the truth concerning
matters that are, up to now, unknown. The illustrious Job bore his
calamities for a long time in silence, and ever showed his courage by
holding out under the most intolerable sufferings, but when he had
struggled long enough in silence, and had persisted in covering his anguish
in the bottom of his heart, at last he opened his mouth and uttered his
well-known words.(1) In my own case this is now the third year of my
silence, and my boast has become like that of the Psalmist "I was as a man
that heareth not and in whose mouth are no reproofs."(2) Thus I shut up in
the bottom of my heart the pangs which I suffered on account of the
calumnies directed against me, for calumny humbles a man, and calumny makes
a poor man giddy.(3) If, therefore, the mischief of calumny is so great as
to cast down even the perfect man from his height, for this is what
Scripture indicates by the word man, and by the poor man is meant he who
lacks the great doctrines, as is the view also of the prophet when he says,
"These are poor, therefore they shall not hear; ... I will get me unto the
great men,"(4) he means by poor those who are lacking in understanding; and
here, too, he plainly means those who are not yet furnished in the inner
man, and have not even come to the full measure of their age; it is these
who are said by the proverb to be made giddy and tossed about. Nevertheless
I thought that I ought to bear  my troubles in silence, waiting for some
indication to come out of them. I did not even think that what was said
against me proceeded from ill will; I thought it was the result of
ignorance of the truth. But now I see that hostility increases with time,
and that my slanderers are not sorry for what they said at the beginning,
and do not take any trouble to make amends for the past, but go on and on
and rally themselves together to attain their original object. This was to
make my life miserable and to devise means for sullying my reputation among
the brethren. I, therefore, no longer see safety in silence. I have
bethought me of the words of Isaiah: " I have long time holden my peace,
shall I always be still and refrain myself? I have been patient like a
travailing woman."(5) God grant that I may both receive the reward of
silence, and gain some strength to confute my opponents, and that thus, by
confuting them, I may dry up the bitter torrent of falsehood that has
gushed out against me. So might I say, "My soul bus passed over the
torrent;"[1] and, "If it had not been the Lord who was on our side when men
rose up against us, ... then they had swallowed us up quick, the water had
drowned us."[2]

   2. Much time had I spent in vanity, and had wasted nearly all my youth
in the vain labour which I underwent in acquiring the wisdom made foolish
by God. Then once upon a time, like a man roused from deep sleep, I turned
my eyes to the marvellous light of the truth of the Gospel, and I perceived
the uselessness of "the wisdom of the princes of this world, that come to
naught." I wept many tears over my miserable life and I prayed that
guidance might be vouchsafed me to admit me to the doctrines of true
religion. First of all was I minded to make some mending of my ways, long
perverted as they were by my intimacy with wicked men. Then I read the
Gospel, and I saw there that a great means of reaching perfection was the
selling of one's goods, the sharing them with the poor, the giving up of
all care for this life, and the refusal to allow the soul to be turned by
any sympathy to things of earth. And I prayed that I might find some one of
the brethren who had chosen this way of life, that with him I might cross
life's short[4] and troubled strait. And many did I find in Alexandria, and
many in the rest of Egypt, and others in Palestine, and in Coele Syria, and
in Mesopotamia. I admired their continence in living, and their endurance
in toil; I was amazed at their persistency in prayer, and at their
triumphing over sleep; subdued by no natural necessity, ever keeping their
souls' purpose high and free, in hunger, in thirst, in cold, in
nakedness,[5] they never yielded to the body; they were never willing to
waste attention on it; always, as though living in a flesh that was not
theirs, they shewed in very deed what it is to sojourn for a while in this
life,[6] and what to have one's citizenship and home in heaven.[7] All this
moved my admiration. I called these men's lives blessed, in that they did
in deed shew that they "bear about in their body the dying of Jesus."[8]
And I prayed that I, too, as far as in me lay, might imitate them.

   3. So when I beheld certain men in my own country striving to copy
their ways, I felt that I had found a help to my own salvation, and I took
the things seen for proof of things unseen. And since the secrets in the
hearts of each of us are unknown, I held lowliness of dress to be a
sufficient indication of lowliness of spirit; and there was enough to
convince me in the coarse cloak, the girdle, and the shoes of untanned
hide.[1] And though many were for withdrawing me from their society, I
would not allow it, because I saw that they put a life of endurance before
a life of pleasure; and, because of the extraordinary excellence of their
lives, I became an eager supporter of them. And so it came about that I
would not hear of any fault being found with their doctrines, although many
maintained that their conceptions about God were erroneous, and that they
bad become disciples of the champion of the present heresy, and were
secretly propagating his teaching. But, as I had never at any time heard
these things with my own ears, I concluded that those who reported them
were calumniators. Then I was called to preside over the Church. Of the
watchmen and spies, who were given me under the pretence of assistance and
loving communion, I say nothing, lest I seem to injure my own cause by
telling an incredible tale, or give believers an occasion for hating their
fellows, if I am believed. This had almost been my own case, had I not been
prevented by the mercy of God. For almost every one became an object of
suspicion to me, and smitten at heart as I was by wounds treacherously
inflicted, I seemed to find nothing in any man that I could trust. But so
far there was, nevertheless, a kind of intimacy kept up between us. Once
and again we held discussions on doctrinal points. and apparently we seemed
to agree and keep together. But they began to find out that I made the same
statements concerning my faith in God which they had always heard from me.
For, if other things in me may move a sigh, this one boast at least I dare
make in the Lord, that never for one moment have I held erroneous
conceptions about God, or entertained heterodox opinions, which I have
learnt later to change. The teaching about God which I had received as a
boy from my blessed mother and my grandmother Macrina, I have ever held
with increased conviction. On my coming to ripe years of reason I did not
shift my opinions from one to another, but carried out the principles
delivered to me by my parents. Just as the seed when it grows is first tiny
and then gets bigger but always preserves its identity, not changed in kind
though gradually perfected in growth, so I reckon the same doctrine to have
grown in my case through gradually advancing stages. What t hold now has
not replaced what I held at the beginning. Let them search their own
consciences. Let these men who have now made me the common talk on the
charge of false doctrine, and deafened all men's ears with the defamatory
letters which they have written against me, so that I am compelled thus to
defend myself, ask themselves if they have ever heard anything from me,
differing from what I now say, and let them remember the judgment seat of
Christ.

   4. I am charged with blasphemy against God. Yet it is impossible for me
to be convicted on the ground of any treatise concerning the Faith, which
they urge against me, nor can I be charged on the ground of the utterances
which I have from thee to thee delivered by word of mouth, without their
being committed to writing, in the churches of God. Not a single witness
has been found to say that he has ever heard from me, when speaking in
private, anything contrary to true religion. If then I am not an unorthodox
writer, if no fault can be found with my preaching, if I do not lead astray
those who converse with me in my own homer on what ground am I being
judged? But there is a new invention! Somebody,[1] runs the charge, in
Syria has written something inconsistent with true religion; and twenty
years or more ago you wrote him a letter: so you are an accomplice of the
fellow, and what is urged against him is urged against you. O truth-loving
sir, I reply, you who have been taught that lies are the offspring of the
devil; what has proved to you that I wrote that letter? You never sent; you
never asked; you were never informed by me, who might have told you the
truth. But if the letter was mine, how do you know that the document that
has come into your hands now is of the same date as my letter? Who told you
that it is twenty years old? How do you know that it is a composition of
the man to whom my letter was sent? And if he was the composer, and I wrote
to him, and my letter and his composition belong to the same date, what
proof is there that I accepted it in my judgment, and that I hold those
views?

   5. Ask yourself. How often did you visit me in my monastery on the
Iris, when my very God-beloved brother Gregory was with me, following the
same course of life as myself? Did you ever hear anything of the kind? Was
there any appearance of such a thing, small or great? How many days did we
spend in the opposite village, at my mother's, living as friend with
friend, and discoursing together night and day? Did you ever find me
holding any opinion of the kind? And when we went together to visit the
blessed Silvanus,[1] did we not talk of these things on the way? And at
Eusinoe,[2] when you were about to set out with other bishops for
Lampsacus,[3] was not our discourse about the faith? Were not your
shorthand writers at my side the whole thee while I was dictating my
objections to the heresy? Were not your most faithful disciples there too?
When I was visiting the brotherhood, and passing the night with them in
their prayers, continually speaking and hearing of the things pertaining to
God without dispute, was not the evidence which I gave of my sentiments
exact and definite? How came you then to reckon this rotten and slender
suspicion as of more importance than the experience of such a length of
time?  What evidence of my frame of mind ought you to have preferred to
your own? Has there been the slightest want of harmony in my utterances
about the faith at Chalcedon, again and again at Heraclea, and at an
earlier period in the suburb of Caesarea? Are they not all mutually
consistent? I only except the increase in force of which I spoke just now,
resulting from advance, and which is not to be regarded as a change from
worse to better, but rather as a filling up of what was wanting in the
addition of knowledge. How can you fail to bear in mind that the father
shall not bear the iniquity of the son, nor the son bear the iniquity of
the father, but each shall die in his own sin?[4] I have neither father nor
son slandered by you; I have had neither teacher nor disciple. But if the
sins of the parents must be made charges against their children, it is far
fairer for the sins of Arius to be charged against his disciples; and,
whoever begat the heretic Aetius,[5] for the charges against the son to be
applied to the father. If on the other hand it is unjust for any one to be
accused for their sakes, it is far more unjust that I should be held
responsible for the sake of men with whom I have nothing to do, even if
they were in every respect sinners, and something worthy of condemnation
has been written by them. I must be pardoned if I do not believe all that
is urged against them. since my own experience shows me how very easy it is
for accusers to slip into slander.

   6. Even if they did come forward to accuse me, because they had been
deceived, and thought that I was associated with the writers of those words
of Sabellius which they are carrying about, they were guilty of
unpardonable conduct in straightway attacking and wounding me, when I had
done them no wrong, before they had obtained plain proof. I do not like to
speak of myself as bound to them in the closest intimacy; or of them as
being evidently not led by the Holy Spirit, because of their cherishing
false suspicions. Much anxious thought must be taken, and many sleepless
nights must be passed, and with many tears must the truth be sought from
God, by him who is on the point of cutting himself off from a brother's
friendship. Even the riders of this world, when they are on the point of
sentencing some evil doer to death, draw the veil aside,[1] and call in
experts for the examination of the case, and consume considerable thee in
weighing the severity of the law against the common fault of humanity, and
with many a sigh and many a lament for then stern necessity of the case,
proclaim before all the people that they are obeying the law from
necessity, and not passing sentence to gratify, their own wishes.[2] How
much greater care and diligence, how ranch more counsel, ought to be taken
by one who is on the point of breaking off from long established friendship
with a brother! In this case there is only a single letter and that of
doubtful genuineness. It would be quite impossible to argue that it is
known by the signature, for they possess not the original, but only a copy.
They depend on one single document and that an old one. It is now twenty
years since anything has been written to that person.[1] Of my opinions and
conduct in the intervening thee I can adduce no better witnesses than the
very men who attack and accuse me.

   7. But the real reason of separation is not this letter. There is
another cause of alienation. I am ashamed to mention it; and I would have
been for ever silent about it had not recent events compelled me to publish
all their mind for the sake of the good of the mass of the people. Good men
have thought that communion with me was a bar to the recovery of their
authority. Some have been influenced by the signature of a certain creed
which I proposed to them, not that I distrusted their sentiments, I
confess, but because I wished to do away with the suspicions which the more
part of the brethren who agree with me entertained of them. Accordingly, to
avoid anything arising from that confession to prevent their being accepted
by the present authorities,[2] they have renounced communion with me. This
letter was devised by an after-thought as a pretext for the separation. A
very plain proof of what I say is, that after they had denounced me, and
composed such complaints against me as suited them, they sent round their
letters in all directions before communicating with me. Their letter was in
the possession of others who had received it in the course of transmission
and who were on the point of sending it on seven days before it had reached
my hands. The idea was that it would be handed from one to another and so
would be quickly distributed over the whole country. This was reported to
me at the thee by those who were giving me clear information of all their
proceedings. But I determined to hold my tongue until the Revealer of all
secrets should publish their doings by plain and incontrovertible
demonstration.

LETTER CCXXIV.[3]: To the presbyter Genethlius.

   1. I have received your reverence's letter and I am delighted at the
title which you have felicitously applied to the writing which they have
composed in calling it "a writing of divorcement,"[4] What defence the
writers will be able to make before the tribunal of Christ, where no excuse
will avail, I am quite unable to conceive. After accusing me, violently
running me down, and telling tales in accordance not with the truth but
with what they wished to be true, they have assumed a great show of
humility, and have accused me of haughtiness for refusing to receive their
envoys. They have written, as they have, what is all--or nearly all--for I
do not wish to exaggerate,--lies, in the endeavour to persuade men rather
than God, and to please men rather than God, with Whom nothing is more
precious than truth. Moreover into the letter written against me they have
introduced heretical expressions, and have concealed the author of the
impiety, in order that most of the more unsophisticated might be deceived
by the calumny got up against me, and suppose the portion introduced to be
mine. For nothing is said by my ingenious slanderers as to the name of the
author of these vile doctrines, and it is left for the simple to suspect
that these inventions, if not their expression in writing. is due to me.
Now that you know all this, I exhort you not to be perturbed yourselves,
and to calm the excitement of those who are agitated. I say this although I
know that it will not be easy for my defence to be received, because I have
been anticipated by the vile calumnies uttered against me by persons of
influence.

   2. Now as to the point that the writings going the round as mine are
not mine at all, the angry feeling felt against me so confuses their reason
that they cannot see what is profitable. Nevertheless, if the question were
put to them by yourselves, I do think that they would not reach such a
pitch of obstinate perversity as to dare to utter the lie with their own
lips, and allege the document in question to be mine. And if it is not
mine, why am I being judged for other men's writings? But they will urge
that I am in communion with Apollinarius, and cherish in my heart perverse
doctrines of this kind. Let them be asked for proof. If they are able to
search into a man's heart, let them say so; and do you admit the truth of
all that they say about everything. If on the other hand, they are trying
to prove my being in communion on plain and open grounds, let them produce
either a canonical letter written by me to him, or by him to me. Let them
shew that I have held intercourse with his clergy, or have ever received
any one of them into the communion of prayer. If they adduce the letter
written now five and twenty years ago, written by layman to layman, and not
even this as I wrote it, but altered (God knows by whom), then recognise
their unfairness. No bishop is accused if, while he was a layman, he wrote
something somewhat incautiously on an indifferent matter; not anything
concerning the Faith, but a mere word of friendly greeting. Possibly even
my opponents are known to have written to Jews and to Pagans, without
incurring any blame. Hitherto no one has ever been judged for any such
conduct as that on which I am being condemned by these strainers-out of
gnats.[1] God, who knows men's hearts, knows that I never wrote these
things, nor sanctioned them, but that I anathematize all who hold the vile
opinion of the confusion of the hypostases, on which point the most impious
heresy of Sabellius has been revived. And all the brethren who have been
personally acquainted with my insignificant self know it equally well. Let
those very men who now vehemently accuse me, search their own consciences,
and they will own that from my boyhood I have been far removed from any
doctrine of the kind.

   3. If any one enquires what my opinion is, he will learn it froth the
actual little document, to which is appended their own autograph signature.
This they wish to destroy, and they are anxious to conceal their own change
of position in slandering me. For they do not like to own that they have
repented of their subscription to the tract I gave them; while they charge
me with impiety from the idea that no one perceives that their disruption
from me is only a pretext, while in reality they have departed from that
faith which they have over and over again owned in writing, before many
witnesses, and have lastly received and subscribed when delivered to them
by me. It is open to any one to read the signatures and to learn the truth
from the document itself. Their intention will be obvious, if, after
reading the subscription which they gave me, any one reads the creed which
they gave Gelasius,[2] and observes what a vast difference there is between
the two confessions. It would be better for men who so easily shift their
own position, not to examine other men's motes but to cast out the beam in
their own eye.[3] I am making a more complete defence on every point in
another letter;[4] this will satisfy readers who want fuller assurance. Do
you, now that you have received this letter, put away all despondency, and
confirm the love to me,[5] which makes me eagerly long for union with you.
Verily it is a great sorrow to me, and a pain in my heart that cannot be
assuaged, if the slanders uttered against me so far prevail as to chill
your love and to alienate us from one another. Farewell.

LETTER CCXXV.[1]: To Demosthenes,[2] as from the synod of bishops.

   I am always very thankful to God and to the emperor, under whose rule
we live. when I see the government of my country put Into the hands of one
who is not only a Christian, but is moreover correct in life and a careful
guardian of the laws according to which our life in this world is ordered.
I have had special reason for offering this gratitude to God and to our
God-beloved emperor on the occasion of your coming among us. I have been
aware that some of the enemies of peace have been about to stir your august
tribunal against me, and have been waiting to be summoned by your
excellency that you might learn the truth from me; if indeed your high
wisdom condescends to consider the examination of ecclesiastical matters to
be within your province.[3] The, tribunal overlooked me, but your
excellency,  moved by the reproaches of Philochares, ordered my brother and
fellow-minister Gregory to be haled before your judgment seat. He obeyed
your summons; how could he do otherwise? But he was attacked by pain in the
side, and at the same time, in consequence of a chill, was attacked by his
old kidney complaint. He has therefore been compelled, forcibly detained by
your soldiers as he was, to be conveyed to some quiet spot, where he could
have his maladies attended to, and get some comfort in his intolerable
agony. Under these circumstances we have combined to approach your lordship
with the entreaty that you will feel no anger at the postponement of the
trial. The public interests have not in any way suffered through our delay,
nor have those of the Church been injured. If there is any question of the
wasteful expenditure of money, the treasurers of the Church funds are
there, ready to give an account to any one who likes, and to exhibit the
injustice of the charges advanced by men who have braved the careful
hearing of the case before you. For they can have no difficulty in making
the truth clear to any one who seeks it from the actual writings of the
blessed bishop himself. If there is any other point of canonical order
which requires investigation, and your excellency deigns to undertake to
hear and to judge it, it will be necessary for us all to be present,
because, if there has been a failure in any point of canonical order, the
responsibility lies with the consecrators and not with him who is forcibly
compelled to undertake the ministry. We therefore petition you to reserve
the hearing of the case for us in our own country, and not to compel us to
travel beyond its borders, nor force us to a meeting with bishops with whom
we have not yet come to agreement on ecclesiastical questions.[1] I beg you
also to be merciful to my own old age and ill health. You will learn by
actual investigation, if it please God, that no canonical rule be it small
or great was omitted in the appointment of the bishop. I pray that under
your administration unity and peace may be brought about with my brethren;
but so long as this does not exist it is difficult for us even to meet,
because ninny of our simpler brethren suffer from our mutual disputes.

LETTER CCXXVI.[2]: To the ascetics under him.

   IT may be that the holy God will grant me the joy of a meeting with
you, for I am ever longing to see yon and bear about you, because in no
other thing do I find rest for my soul than in your progress and perfection
in the commandments of Christ. But so long as this hope remains unrealized
I feel bound to visit you through the instrumentality of our dear and God-
fearing brethren, and to address you, my beloved friends, by letter.
Wherefore I have sent my reverend and dear brother and fellow- worker in
the Gospel, Meletius the presbyter. He will tell you my yearning affection
for you. and the anxiety of my soul, in that, night and day, I beseech the
Lord in your behalf, that I may have boldness in the day of our Lord Jesus
Christ through your salvation, and that when your work is tried by the just
judgment of God you may shine forth in the brightness of the saints. At the
same thee the difficulties of the day cause me deep anxiety, for all
Churches have been tossed to and fro, and all souls are being sifted. Some
have even opened their mouths without any reserve against their fellow
servants. Lies are boldly uttered, and the truth has been hidden. The
accused are being condemned without a trial, and the accusers are believed
without evidence. I had heard that many letters are being carried about
against myself, stinging, gibbeting, and attacking me for matters about
which I have my defence ready for the tribunal of truth; and I had intended
to keep Silence, as indeed I have done; for now for three years I have been
bearing the blows of calumny and the whips of accusation, content to think
that I have the Lord, Who knows all secrets, as witness of its falsehood.
But I see now that many men have silence as a corroboration of these
slanders, and have formed the idea that my silence was due, not to my
longsuffering, but to my inability to open my lips in opposition to the
truth. For these reasons I have attempted to write to you, beseeching your
love in Christ not to accept these partial calumnies as true. because, as
it is written, the law judges no man unless it have heard and known his
actions.[1]

   2. Nevertheless before a fair judge the facts themselves are a
sufficient demonstration of the truth. Wherefore, even if I be, silent, you
can look at events. The very men who are now indicting me for heterodoxy
have been seen openly numbered with the heretical faction. The very
accusers who condemn the for other men's writings, are plainly contravening
their own confessions, given to me by them in writing. Look at the conduct
of the exhibitors of this audacity. It is their invariable custom to go
over to the party in power, to trample on their weaker friends, and to
court the strong. The writers of those famous letters against Eudoxius and
all his t faction, the senders of them to all the brotherhood, the
protesters that they shun  their communion as fatal to souls, and would not
accept the votes given for their deposition, because they were given by
heretics, as they persuaded me then,--these very men, completely forgetful
of all this, have joined their faction.[1] No room for denial is left them.
They laid their mind bare when they embraced private communion with them at
Ancyra, when they had not yet been publicly received by them. Ask them,
then, if Basilides, who gave communion to Ecdicius, is now orthodox, why
when returning from Dardania, did they overthrow his altars in the
territory of Gangra, and set up their own tables?[2] Why have they
comparatively recently[3] attacked the churches of Amasea and Zela and
appointed presbyters and deacons there themselves? If they communicate with
them as orthodox, why do they attack them as heretical? If they hold them
to be heretical, how is it that they do not shun communion with them? Is it
not, my honourable brethren, plain even to he intelligence of a child, that
it is always with a view to some personal advantage that they endeavour to
calumniate or to give support? So they have stood off from me, not because
I did not write in reply (which is alleged to be the main ground of
offence), nor because I did not receive the chorepiscopi whom they assert
they sent. Those who are trumping up the tale will render an account to the
Lord. One man, Eustathius,[4] was sent and gave a letter to the court of
the vicar, and spent three days in the city. When he was on the point of
going home, it is said that he came to my house late in the evening, when I
was asleep. On hearing that I was asleep, he went away; he did not come
near me on the next day, and after thus going through the mere form of
discharging his duty to me, departed. This is the charge under which I am
guilty. This is the sin against which these long-suffering people have
neglected to weigh the previous service wherein I served them in love. For
this error they have made their wrath against me so severe that they have
caused me to be denounced in all the Churches throughout the world--at
least, that is, wherever they could.

   3. But of course this is not the real cause of our separation. It was
when they found that they would recommend themselves to Euzoius(1) if they
were alienated from me, that they devised these pretences. The object was
to find some ground of recommendation with the authorities for their attack
upon me. Now they are beginning to run down even the Nicene Creed, and
nickname me Homoousiast, because in that creed the Only begotten Son is
said to be homoousios with God the Father. Not that one essence is divided
into two kindred parts; God forbid! This was not the meaning of that holy
and God-beloved synod; their meaning was that what the Father is in
essence, such is the Son. And thus they themselves have explained it to us,
in the phrase Light of Light. Now it is the Nicene Creed, brought by
themselves from the west, which they presented to the Synod at Tyana, by
which they were received.(2) But they have an ingenious theory as to
changes of this kind; they use the words of the creed as physicians use a
remedy for the particular moment, and substitute now one and now another to
suit particular diseases. The unsoundness of such a sophism it is rather
for you to consider than for me to prove. For  "the Lord will give you
understanding"(3) to know what is the right doctrine, and what the crooked
and perverse. If indeed we are to subscribe one creed to-day and another
tomorrow, and shift with the seasons, then is the declaration false of him
who said, "One Lord, one faith, one baptism."(4) But if it is true, then
"Let no man deceive you with [these] vain words." They falsely accuse me of
introducing novelties about the Holy Spirit. Ask what the novelty is. I
confess what I have received, that the Paraclete is ranked with Father and
Son, and not numbered with created beings. We have made profession of our
faith in Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, and we are baptized in the name of
Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. Wherefore we never separate the Spirit from
conjunction(5) with the Father and the Son. For our mind, enlightened by
the Spirit, looks at the Son, and in Him, as in an image, beholds the
Father. And I do not invent names of myself, but call the Holy Ghost
Paraclete; nor do I consent to destroy His due glory. These are truly my
doctrines. If any one wishes to accuse me for them, let him accuse me; let
my persecutor persecute me. Let him who believes in the slanders against me
be ready for the judgment. "The Lord is at hand." "I am careful for
nothing,"(11)

   4. If any one in Syria is writing, this is nothing to me. For it is
said "By thy words thou shall be justified, and by thy words thou shall be
condemned."(2) Let my own words judge me. Let no one condemn me for other
men's errors nor adduce letters written twenty years ago in proof that I
would allow communion to the writers of such things. Before these things
were written, and before any suspicion of this kind had been stirred
against them, I did write as layman to layman. I wrote nothing about the
faith in any way like that which they are now carrying about to calumniate
me. I sent nothing but a mere greeting to return a friendly communication,
for I shun and anathematize as impious alike all who are affected with the
unsoundness of Sabellius, and all who maintain the opinions of Arius. If
any one says that Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are the same, and supposes
one thing under several names, and one hypostasis described by three
persons, I rank such an one as belonging to the faction of the Jews.(3)
Similarly, if any one says that the Son is in essence unlike the Father, or
degrades the Holy Ghost into a creature, I anathematize him, and say that
he is coming near to the heathen error. But it is impossible for the mouths
of my accusers to be restrained  by my letter; rather is it likely that
they are being irritated at my defence, and are getting up new and more
violent attacks against me. But it is not difficult for your ears to be
guarded. Wherefore, as far as in you lies, do as I bid you. Keep your heart
clear and unprejudiced by their calumnies; and insist on my rendering an
account to meet the charges laid against me. If you find that truth is on
my side do not yield to lies; if on the other hand you feel that I am
feeble in defending myself, then believe my accusers as being worthy of
credit. They pass sleepless nights to do me mischief. I do not ask this of
you. They are taking to a commercial career, and turning their slanders
against me into a means of profit. I implore you on the other hand to stop
at home, and to lead a decorous life, quietly doing Christ's work.(4) I
advise you to avoid communication with them, for it always tends to the
perversion of their hearers. I say this that you may keep your affection
for the uncontaminated, may preserve the faith of the Fathers in its
integrity. and may appear approved before the Lord as friends of the truth.

LETTER CCXXVII.(1): Consolatory, to the clergy of Colonia.'

   WHAT is so goodly and honourable before God and men as perfect love,
which, as we are told by the wise teacher, is the fulfilling of the law
?(3) I therefore approve of your warm affection for your bishop, for, as to
an affectionate son the loss of a good father is unendurable, so Christ's
Church cannot bear the departure of a pastor and teacher. Thus, in your
exceeding affection for your bishop, you are giving proof of a good and
noble disposition. But this your good will towards your spiritual father is
to be approved so long as it is shewn in reason and moderation; once let it
begin to overstep this line, and it is no longer descrying of the same
commendation. In time case of your very God-beloved brother, our fellow-
minister Euphronius, good government has been shewn by those to whom has
been committed the administration of the Church; they have acted as the
occasion compelled them, to the gain alike of the Church to which be has
been removed and of yourselves from whom he has been taken. Do not look at
this as merely of man's ordaining, nor as having been originated by the
calculations of men who regard earthly things. Believe that those to whom
the anxious care of the Churches belongs bare acted, as they have, with the
aid of the Holy Spirit; impress this inception of the proceedings on your
hearts and do your best to perfect it. Accept quietly and thankfully what
has happened, with the conviction that all, who refuse to accept what is
ordered in God's Churches by the Churches, are resisting the ordinance of
God.(4) Do not enter into a dispute with your Mother Church at Nicopolis.
Do not exasperate yourselves against those who have taken the anxious
responsibility of your souls. In the firm establishment of things at
Nicopolis your part in them may also be preserved; but if some disturbance
affects them, though you have protectors beyond number, with the head the
heart will be destroyed. It is like men who live on the riverside; when
they see some one far up the stream making a strong dam against the
current, they know that, in stopping the inrush of the current, he is
providing for their safety. Just so those who have now undertaken the
weight of the care of the Churches, by protecting the rest, are proving for
your own security. You will be sheltered from every storm, while others
have to bear the brunt of the attack. But you ought also to consider this;
he has not cast you Off; he has taken others into his charge. I am not so
invidious as to compel the man, who is able to give a share of his good
gifts to others, also to confine his favour to you, and to limit it to your
own city. A man who puts a fence round a spring, and spoils the outpour of
the waters, is not free from the disease of envy, and it is just the same
with him who tries to prevent the further flow of abundant teaching. Let
him have some care for Nicopolis too, and let your interests be added to
his anxieties there. He has received an addition of labour, but there is no
diminution in his diligence on your behalf. I am really distressed at out
thing that you have said, which seems to me quite extravagant, namely, that
if you cannot obtain your object, you will betake yourselves to the
tribunals, and put the matter into the hands of men, the great object of
whose prayers is the overthrow of the Churches. Take heed lest men, carried
away by unwise passions, persuade you. to your hurt, to put in any plea
before the courts, and so some catastrophe may ensue, and the weight of the
result fall upon the heads of those who have occasioned it. Take my advice.
It is offered you in a fatherly spirit. Consent to the arrangement with the
very God-beloved bishops, which has been made in accordance with God's
will. Wait for my arrival. When I am with you, with God's help, I will give
you in person all the exhortations which it has been impossible for me to
express in my letter, and will do my utmost to give you all possible
consolation, not by word but in deed.

LETTER CCXXVIII.(1): To the magistrates of Colonia.

   I HAVE received your lordships' letter, and offered thanks to God most
holy, that you, occupied as you are with affairs of state, should not put
those of the Church in the second place. I am grateful to think that every
one of you has shewn anxiety as though he were acting in his own private
interest, nay, in defence of his own life, and that you have written to me
in your distress at the removal of your very God-beloved bishop Euphronius.
Nicopolis has not really stolen him from you; were she pleading her cause
before a judge she might say that she was recovering what is her own. If
honourably treated she will tell you, as becomes an affectionate mother,
that she will share with you the Father who will give a portion of his
grace to each of you: he will not suffer the one to be in any way harmed by
the invasion of their adversaries, and at the same time will not deprive
you, the other, of the care to which you have been accustomed. Bethink you
then of the emergency of the time; apply your best intelligence to
understand how good government necessitates a certain course of action; and
then pardon the bishops who have adopted this course for the establishment
of the Churches of our Lord Jesus Christ. Suggest to yourselves what is
becoming you. Your own intelligence needs no instruction, You know how to
adopt the counsels of those who love you. It is only natural that you
should be unaware of many of the questions that are being agitated, because
of our being situated far away in Armenia; but we who are in the midst of
affairs and have our ears dinned every day on all sides with news of
Churches that are being overthrown, are in deep anxiety lest the common
enemy, in envy at the protracted peace of our life, should be able to sow
his tares in your ground too, and Armenia, as well as other places, be
given over to our adversaries to devour. For the present be still, as not
refusing to allow your neighbours too share with you the use of a goodly
vessel. Ere long, 'if the Lord allow me to come to you, you shall, if it
seem necessary to you, receive yet greater consolation for what has come to
pass.

LETTER CCXXIX.(2): To the clergy of Nicopolis.

   I AM sure that a work done by one or two pious men is not done without
the cooperation of the Holy Spirit. For when nothing merely human is put
before us, when holy men ire moved to action with no thought of their own
personal gratification, and with the sole object of pleasing God. it is
plain that it is the Lord Who is directing their hearts. When spiritually-
minded men take the lead in counsel, and the Lord's people follow them with
consentient hearts, there can be no doubt that their decisions are arrived
at with the participation of our Lord Jesus Christ, Who poured out His
blood for the Churches' sake. You are therefore right in supposing that our
very God-beloved brother and fellow minister Poemenius,(1) who arrived
among you at an opportune moment, and discovered this means of consoling
you, has been divinely moved. I not only praise his discovery of the right
course to take; I much admire the firmness with which, without allowing any
delay to intervene, so as to slacken the energy of the petitioners, or to
give the opposite party an opportunity of taking precautions, and to set in
motion the counterplots of secret foes, he at once crowned his happy course
with a successful conclusion. The Lord of His especial grace keep him and
his, so that the Church, as becomes her, may remain in a succession in no
way degenerate, and not give place to the evil one, who now, if ever, is
vexed at the firm establishment of the Churches.

   2. I have also written at length to exhort our brethren at Colonia.
You, moreover, are bound rather to put up with their frame of mind than to
increase their irritation, as though you despised them for their
insignificance, or provoked them to a quarrel by ) your contempt. It is
only natural for disputants to act without due counsel, and to manage their
own affairs ill with the object of vexing their opponents. And no one is
so small as not to be now able to give an occasion, to those who want an
occasion, for great troubles. I do not speak at random. I speak from my own
experience of my own troubles. From these may God keep yon in answer to
your prayers. Pray also for me, that I may have a successful journey, and,
on my arrival, may share your joy in your present pastor, and with you may
find consolation at the departure of our common father.(2)

LETTER CCXXX.(3): To the magistrates of Nicopolis.

   THE government of the Churches is carried on by those to whom the chief
offices in them have been entrusted, but their hands are strengthened by
the laity. The measures which lay with the God-beloved bishops have been
taken. The rest concerns you, if you deign to accord a hearty reception; to
the bishop who has been given you. and to make a vigorous resistance to
attacks from outside. For nothing is so likely to cause discouragement to
all, whether rulers or the rest who envy your peaceful position, as
agreement in affection to the appointed bishop, and firmness in maintaining
your ground. They are likely to despair of every evil attempt, if they see
that their counsels are accepted neither by clergy nor by laity. Bring it
about then that your own sentiments as to the right(1) may  be shared by
all the city, and so speak to the citizens, and to all the inhabitants of
the district, in confirmation of their good sentiments, that the
genuineness of your love to God may be everywhere known. I trust that it
may be permitted me one day to visit and inspect a Church which is the
nursing mother of true religion, honoured by me as a metropolis of
orthodoxy, because it has from of old been under the government of men
right honourable and the elect of God, who have held fast to " the faithful
word as we have been taught."(2) You have approved him who has just been
appointed as worthy of these predecessors, and I have agreed. May you be
preserved by God's grace. May He scatter the evil counsels of 3 our
enemies, and fix in your souls strength and constancy to preserve what has
been rightly determined on.

LETTER CCXXXI.(3): To Amphilochius, bishop of Iconium.

   I FIND few opportunities of writing to your reverence, and this causes
me no little trouble. It is just the same as if, when it was in my power to
see you and enjoy your society very often. I did so but seldom. But it is
impossible for me to write to you because so few travel hence to you,
otherwise there is no reason why my letter should not be a kind of journal
of my life, to tell you, my dear friend, everything that happens to me day
by day. It is a comfort to me to tell you my affairs, and I know that you
care for nothing more than for what concerns me. Now, however, Elpidius(4)
is going  home to his own master, to refute the calumnies falsely got up
against him by certain enemies, and he has asked me for a letter. I
therefore salute your reverence by him and corn mend to you a man who
deserves your protection, at once for the sake of justice and for my own
sake. Although I could say nothing else in his favour, yet, because he has
made it of very great importance to be the bearer of my letter, reckon him
among our friends, and remember me and pray for the Church.

   You must know that my yew God-beloved brother is in exile, for he could
not endure the annoyance caused him by shameless persons.(1) Doara(2) is in
a state of agitation. for the  fat sea monster is throwing everything into
confusion. My enemies, as I am informed  by those who know, are plotting
against me  at court. But hitherto the hand of the Lord  has been over me.
Only pray that I be not  abandoned in the end. My brother is taking things
quietly Doara has received the  old muleteer.(4) She can do no more. The
Lord will scatter the counsels of my enemies. The out cure for all my
troubles present and to come is to set eyes on you. If you possibly can,
while I am still alive, do come to see me. The book on the Spirit has been
written by me, and is finished, as you know, My brethren here have
prevented me from sending it to you written on paper, and have told me that
they had your excellency's orders to engross it on parchment.' Not, then,
to appear to do anything against your injunctions, I have delayed now, but
I will send it a little later, if only I find any suitable person to convey
it. May you be granted to me and to God's Church by the kindness of the
Holy One, in all health and happiness, and praying for me to the Lord.

LETTER CCXXXII.(6): To Amphilochius, bishop of Iconium.

   EVERY day that brings me a letter from you is a feast day, the very
greatest of feast days. And when symbols of the feast are brought, what can
I call it but a feast of feasts, as the old law used to speak of Sabbath of
Sabbaths? I thank the Lord that you are quite well, and that you have
celebrated the commemoration of the economy of salvation(7) in a Church at
peace. I have been disturbed by some troubles; and have not been without
distress from the fact of my God-beloved brother being in exile. Pray for
him that God may one day grant him to see his Church healed from the woulds
of heretical bites. Do come to see me while I am yet upon this earth. Act
in accordance with your own wishes and with my most earnest prayers. I may
be allowed to be astonished at the meaning of your blessings, inasmuch as
you have mysteriously wished me a vigorous old age. By your lamps(1) you
rouse me to nightly toil; and by your sweet meats you seem to pledge
yourself securely that all my body is in good case. But there is no
munching for me at my time of life, for my teeth have long ago been worn
away by time and bad health. As to what you have asked me there are some
replies in the document I send you, written to the best of my ability, and
as opportunity has allowed.

LETTER CCXXXIII: To Amphilochius, in reply to certain questions.

   1. I KNOW that I have myself heard of this, and I am aware of the
constitution of mankind. What shall I say? The mind is a wonderful thing,
and therein we possess that which is after the image of the Creator. And
the operation of the mind is wonderful; in that, in its perpetual motion,
it frequently forms imaginations about things non-existent as though they
were existent, and is frequently carried straight to the truth. But there
are in it two faculties; in accordance with the view of us who believe in
God, the one evil, that of the daemons which draws us on to their own
apostasy; and the divine and the good, which brings us to the likeness of
God. When, therefor, the mind remains alone and unaided, it contemplates
small things, commensurate with itself. When it yields to those who deceive
it, it nullifies its proper judgment, and is concerned with monstrous
fancies. Then it considers wood to be no longer wood, but a god; then it
looks on gold no longer as money, but as an object of worship.(3) If on the
other hand it assents to its diviner part, and accepts the boons of the
Spirit, then, so fir as its nature admits, it becomes perceptive of the
divine. There are, as it were, three conditions of  life, and three
operations of the mind. Our ways may be wicked, and the movements of our
mind wicked; such as adulteries, thefts, idolatries, slanders, strife,
passion, sedition, vain-glory, and all that the apostle Paul enumerates
among the works of the flesh.(1) Or the soul's operation is, as it were, in
a mean, and has nothing about it either damnable or laudable, as the
perception of such mechanical crafts as we commonly speak of as
indifferent, and, of their own character, inclining neither towards virtue
nor towards vice. For what vice is there in the craft of the helmsman or
the physician? Neither are these operations in themselves virtues, but they
incline in one direction or the other in accordance with the will of those
who use them. But the mind which is impregnated with the Godhead of the
Spirit is at once capable of viewing great objects; it beholds the divine
beauty, though only so far as grace imparts and its nature receives.

   2. Let them dismiss, therefore, these questions of dialectics and
examine the truth, not with mischievous exactness but with reverence. The
judgment of our mind is given us for the understanding of the truth. Now
our God is the very truth.(2) So the primary function of our mind is to
know one God, but to know Him so far as the infinitely great can be known
by the very small. When our eyes are first brought to the perception of
visible objects, all visible objects are not at once brought into sight.
The hemisphere of heaven is not beheld with one glance, but we are
surrounded by a certain appearance, though in reality many things, not to
say all things, in it are unperceived;--the nature of the stars, their
greatness, their distances, their movements, their conjunctions, their
intervals, their other conditions, the actual essence of the firmament, the
distance of depth from the concave circumference to the convex surface.
Nevertheless, no one would allege the heaven to be invisible because of
what is unknown; it would be said to be visible on account of our limited
perception of it. It is just the same in the case of God. If the mind has
been injured by devils it will be guilty of idolatry, or will be perverted
to some other form of impiety. But if it has yielded to the aid of the
Spirit, it will have understanding of the truth, and will know God. But it
will know Him, as the Apostle says, in part; and in the life to come more
perfectly. For "when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in
part shall be done away."(3) The judgment of the mind is, therefore, good
and given us for a good end--the perception of God; but it operates only so
far as it can.

LETTER CCXXXIV.(1): To the same, in answer to another question.

   Do you worship what you know or what you do not know? If I answer, I
worship what I know, they immediately reply, What is the essence of the
object of worship? Then, if I confess that I am ignorant of the essence,
they turn on me again and say, So you worship you know not what. I answer
that the word to know has many meanings. We say that we know the greatness
of God, His power, His wisdom, His goodness, His providence over us, and
the justness of His judgment; but not His very essence. The question is,
therefore, only put for the sake of dispute. For he who denies that he
knows the essence does not confess himself to be ignorant of God. because
our idea of God is gathered from all tire attributes which I have
enumerated. But God, he says, is simple, and whatever attribute of Him you
have reckoned as knowable is of His essence. But tile absurdities involved
in this sophism are innumerable. When all these high attributes have been
enumerated, are they all names of one essence? And is there the same mutual
force in His awfulness and His loving-kindness, His justice and His
creative power, His providence and His foreknowledge, and His bestowal of
rewards and punishments, His majesty and His providence? In mentioning any
one of these do we declare His essence? If they say, yes, let them not ask
if we know the essence of God, but let them enquire of us whether we know
God to be awful, or just, or merciful. These we confess that we know. if
they say that essence is something distinct, let them not put us in the
wrong on the score of simplicity. For they confess themselves that there is
a distinction between the essence and each one of the attributes
enumerated. The operations are various, and tile essence simple, but we say
that we know our God from His operations, but do not undertake to approach
near to His essence. His operations come down to us, but His essence
remains beyond our reach.

   2. But, it is replied, if you are ignorant of the essence, you are
ignorant of Himself. Retort, If you say that you know His essence, you are
ignorant of Himself. A man who has been bitten by a mad dog, and sees a dog
in a dish, does not really see any more than is seen by people in good
health; he is to be pitied because he thinks he sees what he does not see.
Do not then admire him for his announcement, but pity him for his insanity.
Recognise that the voice is the voice of mockers, when they say, if you are
ignorant of the essence of God, you worship what you do not know. I do know
that He exists; what His essence is, I look at as beyond intelligence. How
then am I saved? Through faith. It is faith sufficient to know that God
exists, without knowing what He is; and "He is a rewarder of them that seek
Him ."(1) So knowledge of the divine essence involves perception of His
incomprehensibility, and the object of our worship is not that of which we
comprehend the essence, but of which we comprehend that the essence exists.

   3. And the following counter question may also be put to them. "No man
hath seen God at any time, the Only-begotten which is in the bosom hath
declared him.''(2) What of the Father did the Only-begotten Son declare?
His essence or His power? If His power, we know so much as He declared to
us. If His essence,  tell me where He said that His essence was  the being
unbegotten ?(3) When did Abraham  worship? Was it not when he believed? And
when did he believe? Was it not when he was called? Where in this place is
there any testimony in Scripture to Abraham's comprehending? When did the
disciples worship Him? Was it not when they saw creation subject to Him? It
was from the obedience of sea and winds to Him that they recognised His
Godhead. Therefore the knowledge came from the operations, and the worship
from the knowledge. "Believest thou that I am able to do this ?" "I
believe, Lord;"(4) and he worshipped Him. So worship follows faith, and
faith is confirmed by power. But if you say that the believer [also knows,
he knows from what he believes; and vice versa he believes from what he
knows. We know God from His power. We, therefore, believe in Him who is
known, and we worship Him who is believed in.

LETTER CCXXXV.(5): To the same, in answer to another question.

   1. WHICH is first in order, knowledge or faith? I reply that generally,
in the case of disciples, faith precedes knowledge. But, in our teaching,
if any one asserts knowledge to come before faith, I make no objection;
understanding knowledge so far as is within the bounds of human
comprehension. In our lessons we must first believe that the letter a is
said to us; then we learn the characters and their pronunciation, and last
of all we get the distinct idea of the force of the letter. But in our
belief about God, first comes the idea that God is. This we gather from His
works. For, as we perceive His wisdom, His goodness, and all His invisible
things from the creation of the world,(1) so we know Him. So, too, we
accept Him as our Lord. For since God is the Creator of the whole world,
and we are a part of the world, God is our Creator. This knowledge is
followed by faith, and this faith by worship.

   2. But the word knowledge has many meanings, and so those who make
sport of simpler minds, and like to make themselves remarkable by
astounding statements (just like jugglers who get the balls out of sight
before men's very eyes), hastily included everything in their general
enquiry. Knowledge, I say, has a very wide application, and knowledge may
be got of what a tiring is, by number, by bulk, by force, by its mode of
existence, by the period of its generation, by its essence. When then our
opponents include the whole in their question, if they catch us in the
confession that we know, they straightway demand from us knowledge of the
essence; if, on the contrary, they see us cautious as to making any
assertion on the subject, they affix on us the stigma of impiety. I,
however, confess that I know what is knowable of God, and that I know what
it is which is beyond my comprehension.(2) So if you ask me if I know what
sand is, and I reply that I do, you will obviously be slandering me, if you
straightway ask me the number of the sand; inasmuch as your first enquiry
bore only on the form of sand, while your second unfair objection bore upon
its number. The quibble is just as though any one were to say, Do yon know
Timothy? Oh, if you know Timothy you know his nature. Since you have
acknowledged that you know Timothy, give me an account of Timothy's nature.
Yes; but I at the same time both know and do not know Timothy, though not
in the same way and in the same degree. It is not that I do not know in the
same way in which I do know; but I know in one way and am ignorant in one
way. I  know him according to his forth and other properties; but I am
ignorant of his essence. Indeed, in this way too, I both know, and am
ignorant of, myself. I know indeed who I am, but, so far as I am ignorant
of my essence I do not know myself

   3. Let them tell me in what sense Paul says, "Now we know in part";(1)
do we know His essence in part, as knowing parts of His essence? No. This
is absurd; for God is without parts. But do we know the whole essence? How
then "When that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall
be done away."(3) Why are idolaters found fault with? Is it not because
they knew God and did not honour Him as God? Why are the "foolish
Galatians"(3) reproached by Paul in the words, "After that ye have known
God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly
elements?"(4) How was God known in Jewry? Was it because in Jewry it was
known what His essence is? "The ox," it is said, "knoweth his owner."(5)
According to your argument the ox knows his lord's essence. " And the ass
his master's crib."(6) So the ass knows the essence of the crib, but
"Israel doth not know me." So, according to you, Israel is found fault with
for not knowing what the essence of God is. "Pour out thy wrath upon the
heathen that have not known thee,"(7) that is, who have not comprehended
thy essence. But, I repeat, knowledge is manifold--it involves perception
of our Creator, recognition of His wonderful works, observance of His
commandments and intimate communion with Him. All this they thrust on one
side and force knowledge into one single meaning, the contemplation of
God's essence. Thou shall put them, it is said, before the testimony and I
shall be known of thee thence.(8) Is the term, "I shall be known of thee,"
instead of, " I will reveal my essence"? "The Lord knoweth them that are
his."(9) Does He know the essence of them that are His, but is ignorant of
the essence of those who disobey Him? "Adam knew his wife."(10) Did he know
her essence? It is said of Rebekah "She was a virgin, neither had any man
known her,"(11) and "How shall this be seeing I know not a man?"(12) Did no
man know Rebekah's essence? Does Mary mean " I do not know the essence of
any man"? Is it not the custom of Scripture to use the word "know" of
nuptial embraces? The statement that God shall he known from the mercy seat
means that He will be known to His worshippers. And the Lord knoweth them
that are His, means that on account of their good works He receives them
into intimate communion with Him.

LETTER CCXXXVI.(1): To the same Amphilochius.

   1. ENQUIRY has already frequently been made concerning the saying of
the gospels as to our Lord Jesus Christ's ignorance of the day and of the
hour of the end;(2) an objection constantly put forward by the Anomoeans to
the destruction of the glory of the Only-Begotten, in order to show Him to
be unlike in essence and subordinate in dignity; inasmuch as, if He know
not all things, He cannot possess the same nature nor be regarded as of one
likeness with Him, who by His own prescience and faculty of forecasting the
future has knowledge coextensive with the universe. This question has now
been proposed to me by your intelligence as a new one. I can give in reply
the answer which I heard from our fathers when I was a boy, anti which on
account of my love for what is good, I have received without question. I do
not expect that it can undo the shamelessness of them that fight against
Christ, for where is the reasoning strong enough to stand their attack? It
may, however, suffice to convince all that love the Lord, anti in whom the
previous assurance supplied them by faith is stronger than any
demonstration of reason.

   Now "no man" seems to be a general expression, so that not even one
person is excepted by it, but this is not its use in Scripture, as I have
observed in the passage "there is none good but one, that is, God."(3) For
even in this passage the Son does not so speak to the exclusion of Himself
from the good nature. But, since the Father is the first good, we believe
the words" no man" to have been uttered with the understood addition of "
first."(4) So with the passage "No than knoweth the Son but the Father;
"(5) even here there is no charge of ignorance against the Spirit, but only
a testimony that knowledge of His own nature naturally belongs to the
Father first. Thus also we understand " No man knoweth,"(1) to refer to the
Father the first knowledge of things, both present and to be, and generally
to exhibit to men the first cause. Otherwise how can this passage fall in
with the rest of the evidence of Scripture, or agree with the common
notions of us who believe that the Only-Begotten is the image of the
invisible God, and image not of the bodily figure, but of the very Godhead
and of the mighty qualities attributed to the essence of God, image of
power, image of wisdom, as Christ is called "the power of God and the
wisdom of God "?(2) Now of wisdom knowledge is plainly a part; and if in
any part He falls short, He is not an image of the whole; and how can we
understand the Father not to have shewn that day and that hour--the
smallest portion of the ages--to Him through Whom He made the ages? How can
the Creator of the universe fall short of the knowledge of the smallest
portion of the things created by Him? How can He who says, when the end is
near, that such and such signs shall appear in heaven and in earth, be
ignorant of the end itself? When He says, "The end is not yet."(3) He makes
a definite statement, as though with knowledge and not in doubt. Then
further, it is plain to the fair enquirer that our Lord says many things to
men, in the character of man; as for instance, "give me to drink"(4) is a
saying of our Lord, expressive of His bodily necessity; and yet the asker
was not soulless flesh. but Godhead using flesh endued with soul.(5) So in
the present instance no one will be carried beyond the bounds of the
interpretation of true religion, who understands the ignorance of him who
had received all things according to the oeconomy,(6) and was advancing
with God and man in favour and wisdom.(7)

   2. It would be worthy of your diligence to set the phrases of the
Gospel side by side, and compare together those of Matthew and those of
Mark, for these two alone are found in concurrence in this passage. The
wording of Matthew is "of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the
angels of heaven, but my Father only."(8) That of Mark runs, "But of that
day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven,
neither the Son, but the Father."(1) What is noticeable in these passages
is this; that Matthew says nothing about the ignorance of the Son, and
seems to agree with Mark as to sense in saying "but my Father only." Now I
understand the word "only" have been used in contradistinction to the
angels, but that the Son is not included with His own servants in
ignorance.

   He could not say what is false Who said "All things that the Father
hath are Mine,"(2) but one of the things which the Father hath is knowledge
of that day and of that hour. In the passage in Matthew, then, the Lord
made no mention of His own Person, as a matter beyond controversy, and said
that the angels knew not and that His Father alone knew, tacitly asserting
the knowledge of His Father to be His own knowledge too, because of what He
had said elsewhere. "as the Father knoweth me even so know I the
Father,"(3) and if the Father has complete knowledge of the Son, nothing
excepted, so that He knows all knowledge to dwell in Him, He will clearly
be known as fully by the Son with all His inherent wisdom and all His
knowledge of things to come. This modification, I think, may be given to
the words of Matthew, "but my Father only." Now as to the words of Mark,
who appears distinctly to exclude the Son from the knowledge, my opinion is
this. No man knoweth, neither the angels of God; nor yet the Son would have
known unless the Father had known: that is, the cause of the Son's knowing
comes from the Father. To a fair hearer there is no violence in this
interpretation, because the wore "only" is not added as it is in Matthew.
Mark's sense, then, is as follows: of that day and of that hour knoweth no
man, nor the angels of God; but even the Son would not have known if the
Father had not known, for the knowledge naturally His was given by the
Father. This is very decorous and becoming the divine nature to say of the
Son, because He has, His knowledge and His being, beheld in all the wisdom
and glory which become His Godhead, from Him with Whom He is
consubstantial.

   3. As to Jeconias, whom the prophet Jeremiah declares in these words to
have been rejected from the land of Judah, "Jeconias was dishonoured like a
vessel for which there is no more use; and because he was cast out he and
his seed; and none shall rise from his seed sitting upon the throne of
David and ruling in Judah,"(4) the matter is plain and clear. On the
destruction of   Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar, the kingdom s  had been
destroyed, and there was no longer   an hereditary succession of reigns as
before. Nevertheless, at that time, the deposed descendants of David were
living in captivity. On the return of Salathiel and Zerubbabel the supreme
government rested to a greater degree with the people, and the sovereignty
was afterwards transferred to the priesthood, on account of the
intermingling of the priestly and royal tribes; whence the Lord, in things
pertaining, to God, is both King and High Priest. Moreover, the royal tribe
did not fail until the coming of the Christ; nevertheless, the seed of
Jeconias sat no longer upon the throne of David. Plainly it is the royal
dignity which is described by the term "throne." You remember the history,
how all Judaea, Idumaea, Moab. both the neighbouring regions of Syria and
the further countries up to Mesopotamia, and the country on the other side
as far as the river of Egypt, were all tributary to David. If then none of
his descendants appeared with a sovereignty so wide, how is not the word of
the prophet true that no one of the seed of Jeconias should any longer sit
upon the throne of David, for none of his descendants appears to have
attained this dignity. Nevertheless, the tribe of Judah did not fail, until
He for whom it was destined came. But even He did not sit upon the material
throne. The kingdom of Judaea was transferred to Herod, the son of
Antipater the Ascalonite, and his sons who divided Judaea into four
principalities, when Pilate was Procurator and Tiberius was Master of the
Roman Empire. It is the indestructible kingdom which he calls the throne of
David on which the Lord sat. He is the expectation of the Gentiles(1) and
not of the smallest division of the world, for it is written, " In that day
there shall be a root of Jesse which shall stand for an ensign of the
people; to it shall the Gentiles seek."(2) "I have called thee ...for a
covenant of the people for a light of the Gentiles ";(3) and thus then God
remained a priest although He did not receive the sceptre of Judah, and
King of all the earth; so the blessing of Jacob was fulfilled, and in
Him(4) "shall all the nations of the earth be blessed," and all the nations
shall call the Christ blessed.

   4. And as to the tremendous question put by the facetious Encratites,
why we do not eat everything? Let this answer be given, that we turn with
disgust from our excrements. As far as dignity goes, to us flesh is grass;
but as to distinction between what is and what is not serviceable, just as
in vegetables, we separate the unwholesome from the wholesome, so in flesh
we distinguish between that which is good and that which is bad for food.
Hemlock is a vegetable, just as vulture's flesh is flesh yet no one in his
senses would eat henbane nor dog's flesh unless he were in very great
straits. If he did, however, he would not sin.

   5. Next as to those who maintain that human affairs are governed by
fate, do not ask information from me, but stab them with their own shafts
of rhetoric. The question is too long for my present infirmity. With regard
to emerging in baptism--I do not know how it came into your mind to ask
such a question, if indeed you understood immersion to fulfil the figure of
the three days. It is impossible for any one to be immersed three times,
without emerging three times. We write the word "pha'gos" paroxytone.(1)

   6. The distinction between ousi'a and hupo'stasis is the same as that
between the general and the particular; as, for instance, between the
animal and the particular man. Wherefore, in the case of the Godhead, we
confess one essence or substance so as not to give a variant definition of
existence hut we confess a particular hypostasis, in order that our
conception of Father, Son and Holy Spirit may be without confusion and
clear.(2) If we have no distinct perception of the separate
characteristics, namely, fatherhood, sonship, and sanctification, but form
our conception of God from the general idea of existence, we cannot
possibly give a sound account of our faith. We must, therefore, confess the
faith by adding the particular to the common. The Godhead is common; the
fatherhood particular. We must therefore combine the two and say," I
believe in God the Father." The like course must be pursued in the
confession of the Son; we must combine the particular with the common and
say "I believe in God the Son," so in the case of the Holy Ghost we must
make our utterance conform to the appellation and say "in God(3) the Holy
Ghost." Hence it results that there is a satisfactory preservation of the
unity by the confession of the one Godhead, while in the distinction of the
individual properties regarded in each there is the confession of the
peculiar properties of the Persons. On the other hand those who identify
essence or substance and hypostasis are compelled to confess only three
Persons,(1) and, in their hesitation to speak of three hypostases, are
convicted of failure to avoid the error of Sabellius, for even Sabellius
himself, who in many places confuses the conception, yet, by asserting that
the same hypostasis changed its form(2) to meet the needs of the moment,
does endeavour to distinguish persons.

   7. Lastly as to your enquiry in what manner things neutral and
indifferent are ordained for us, whether by some chance working by its own
accord, or by the righteous providence of God, my answer is this: Health
and sickness, riches and poverty, credit and discredit, inasmuch as they do
not render their possessors good, are not in the category of things
naturally good, but, in so far as in any way they make life's current flow
more easily, in each case the former is to be preferred to its contrary,
and has a certain kind of value. To some men these things are given by God
for stewardship's sake,(8) as for instance to Abraham, to Job and such
like. To inferior characters they are a challenge to improvement. For the
man who persists in unrighteousness, after so goodly a token of love from
God, subjects himself to condemnation without defence. The good man,
however, neither turns his heart to wealth when he has it, nor seeks after
it if he has it not. He treats what is given him as given him not for his
selfish enjoyment, but for wise administration. No one in his senses, runs
after the trouble of distributing other people's property, unless he is
trying to get the praise of the world, which admires and envies anybody in
authority.

   Good men take sickness as athletes take their contest, waiting for the
crowns that are to reward their endurance. To ascribe the dispensation of
these things to any one else is as inconsistent with true religion as it is
with common sense.


Taken from "The Early Church Fathers and Other Works" originally published
by Wm. B. Eerdmans Pub. Co. in English in Edinburgh, Scotland, beginning in
1867. (LNPF II/VIII, Schaff and Wace). The digital version is by The
Electronic Bible Society, P.O. Box 701356, Dallas, TX 75370, 214-407-WORD.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
  The electronic form of this document is copyrighted.
  Copyright (c) Eternal Word Television Network 1996.
  Provided courtesy of:

       EWTN On-Line Services
       PO Box 3610
       Manassas, VA 22110
       Voice: 703-791-2576
       Fax: 703-791-4250
       Data: 703-791-4336
       FTP: ftp.ewtn.com
       Telnet: ewtn.com
       WWW: http://www.ewtn.com.
       Email address: [email protected]

-------------------------------------------------------------------

You are viewing proxied material from gopher.ratthing.com. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.