(NOTE: The electronic text obtained from The Electronic Bible Society was
not completely corrected. EWTN has corrected all discovered errors.)


ST. ATHANASIUS

HISTORY OF THE ARIANS

[Oxford translation by Rev. M. Atkinson, revised by Rev. Archibald
Robertson, Principal of Bishop Hatfield's Hall, Durham, late fellow of
Trinity College, Oxford.]


HISTORIA ARIANORUM AD MONACHOS

PART I: ARIAN PERSECUTION UNDER CONSTANTINE.

   1. AND not long after they put in execution the designs for the sake of which they had had recourse to
these artifices; for they no sooner had formed their plans, but they immediately admitted Arius and his
fellows to communion. They set aside the repeated condemnations which had been passed upon them, and
again pretended the imperial authority(1) in their behalf. And they were not ashamed to say in their letters,
'since Athanasius suffered, all jealousy(2) has ceased, and let us henceforward receive Arius and his
fellows;' adding, in order to frighten their hearers, 'because the Emperor has commanded it.' Moreover,
they were not ashamed to add, 'for these men profess orthodox opinions;' not fearing that which is written,
'Woe unto them that I call bitter sweet, that put darkness for light(3);' for they are ready to undertake
anything in support of their heresy. Now is it not hereby plainly proved to all men, that we both suffered
heretofore, and that you now persecute us, not under the authority of an Ecclesiastical sentence(4), but on
the ground of the Emperor's threats, and on account of our piety towards Christ? As also they conspired in
like manner against other Bishops, fabricating charges against them also; some of whom fell asleep in the
place of their exile, having attained the glory of Christian confession; and others are still banished from
their country, and contend still more and more manfully against their heresy, saying, 'Nothing shall
separate us from the love of Christ(5)?'

2. Arians sacrifice morality and integrity to party.

   And hence also you may discern its character, and be able to condemn it more confidently. The man who
is their friend and their associate in impiety, although he is open to ten thousand charges for other
enormities which he has committed; although the evidence and proof against him are most clear; he is
approved of by them, and straightway becomes the friend of the Emperor, obtaining an introduction by his
impiety; and making very many pretences, he acquires confidence before the magistrates to do whatever he
desires. But he who exposes their impiety, and honestly advocates the cause of Christ, though he is pure in
all things, though he is conscious of no delinquencies, though he meets with no accuser; yet on the false
pretences which they have framed against him, is immediately seized and sent into banishment under a
sentence of the Emperor, as if he were guilty of the crimes which they wish to charge upon him, or as if,
like Naboth, he had insulted the King; while he who advocates the cause of their heresy is sought for and
immediately sent to take possession of the other's Church; and henceforth confiscations and insults, and all
kinds of cruelty are exercised against those who do not receive him. And what is the strangest of all, the
man whom the people desire, and know to be blameless[6], the Emperor takes away and banishes; but him
whom they neither desire, nor know, he sends to them from a distant place with soldiers and letters from
himself. And henceforward a strong necessity is laid upon them, either to hate him whom they love; who
has been their teacher, and their father in godliness; and to love him whom they do not desire, and to trust
their children to one of whose life and conversation and character they are ignorant; or else certainly to
suffer punishment, if they disobey the Emperor.

3. Recklessness of their proceedings.

   In this manner the impious are now proceeding, as heretofore, against the orthodox; giving proof of their
malice and impiety amongst all men everywhere. For granting that they have accused Athanasius; yet what
have the other Bishops done? On what grounds can they charge them? Has there been found in their case
too the dead body of an Arsenius? Is there a Presbyter Macarius, or has a cup been broken amongst them?
Is there a Meletian to play the hypocrite? No: but as their proceedings against the other Bishops shew the
charges which they have brought against Athanasius, in all probability, to be false; so their attacks upon
Athanasius make it plain, that their accusations of the other Bishops are unfounded likewise. This heresy
has come forth upon the earth like some great monster, which not only injures the innocent with its words,
as with teeth(7); but it has also hired external power to assist it in its designs. And strange it is that, as I said
before, no accusation is brought against any of them; or if any be accused, he is not brought to trial; or if a
shew of enquiry be made, he is acquitted against evidence, while the convicting party is plotted against,
rather than the culprit put to shame. Thus the whole party of them is full of idleness; and their spies, for
Bishops(8) they are not, are the vilest of them all. And if any one among them desire to become a Bishop,
he is not told, 'a Bishop must be blameless(9);' but only, 'Take up opinions contrary to Christ, and care not
for manners. This will be sufficient to obtain favour for you, and friendship with the Emperor.' Such is the
character of those who support the tenets of Arius. And they who are zealous for the truth, however holy
and pure they shew themselves, are yet, as I said before, made culprits, whenever these men choose, and on
whatever pretences it may seem good to them to invent. The truth of, this, as I before remarked, you may
clearly gather from their proceedings.

4. Arians persecute Eustathius and others.

   There was one Eustathius(1), Bishop of Antioch, a Confessor, and sound in the Faith. This man, because
he was very zealous for the truth, and hated the Arian heresy, and would not receive those who adopted its
tenets, is falsely accused before the Emperor Constantine, and a charge invented against him, that he had
insulted his mother(2). And immediately he is driven into banishment, and a great number of Presbyters
and Deacons with him. And immediately after the banishment of the Bishop, those whom he would not
admit into the clerical order on account of their impiety were not only received into the Church by them,
but were even appointed the greater part of them to be Bishops, in order that they might have accomplices
in their impiety. Among these was Leontius the eunuch(3), now of Antioch, and his predecessor Stephanus,
George of Laodicea, and Theodosius who was of Tripolis, Eudoxius of Germanicia, and Eustathius(4), now
of Sebastia.

   5. Did they then stop here? No. For Eutropius(5), who was Bishop of Adrianople, a good man, and
excellent in all respects, because he had often convicted Eusebius, and had advised them who came that
way, not to comply with his impious dictates, suffered the same treatment as Eustathius, and was east out
of his city and his Church. Basilina(6) was the most active in the proceedings against him. And Euphration
of Balanea, Kymatius of Paltus, Carterius of Antaradus(6a), Asclepas of Gaza, Cyrus of Bercoea in Syria,
Diodorus of Asia, Domnion of Sirmium, and Ellanicus of Tripolis, were merely known to hate the heresy;
and some of them on one pretence or another, some without any, they removed under the authority of royal
letters, drove them out of their cities, and appointed others whom they knew to be impious men, to occupy
the Churches in their stead.

6. Case of Marcellus.

   Of Marcellus(7), the Bishop of Galatia, it is perhaps superfluous for me to speak; for all men have heard
how Eusebius and his fellows, who had been first accused by him of impiety, brought a counter-accusation
against him, and caused the old man to be banished. He went up to Rome, and there made his defence, and
being required by them, he offered a written declaration of his faith, of which the Council of Sardica
approved. But Eusebius and his fellows made no defence, nor, when they were convicted of impiety out of
their writings, were they put to shame, but rather assumed greater boldness against all. For they had an
introduction, to the Emperor from the women(8), and were formidable to all men.

7. Martyrdom of Paul of Constantinople.

   And I suppose no one is ignorant of the case of Paul(9), Bishop of Constantinople; for the more
illustrious any city is, so much the more that which takes place in it is not concealed. A charge was
fabricated against him also. For Macedonius his accuser, who has, now become Bishop in his stead (I was
present myself at the accusation), afterwards held communion with him, and was a Presbyter under Paul
himself. And yet when Eusebius with an evil eye wished to seize upon the Bishopric of that city (he had
been translated in the same manner from Berytus to Nicomedia), the charge was revived against Paul; and
they did not give up their plot, but persisted in the calumny. And he was banished first into Pontus by
Constantine, and a second time by Constantius he was sent bound with iron chains to Singara in
Mesopotamia, and from thence transferred to Emesa, and a fourth time he was banished to Cucusus in
Cappadocia, near the deserts of Mount Taurus; where, as those who were with him have declared, he died
by strangulation at their hands. And yet these men who never speak the truth, though guilty of this, were
not ashamed after his death to invent another story, representing that he had died from illness; although all
who live in that place know the circumstances. And even Philagrius(1), who was then Deputy- Governor(2)
of those parts, and represented all their proceedings in such manner as they desired, was yet astonished at
this; and being grieved perhaps that another, and not himself, had done the evil deed, he informed Serapion
the Bishop, as well as many other of our friends, that Paul was shut up by them in a very confined and dark
place, and left to perish of hunger; and when after six days they went in and found him still alive, they
immediately set upon the man, and strangled him. This was the end of his life; and they said that Philip
who was Prefect was their agent in the perpetration of this murder. Divine Justice, however, did not
overlook this; for not a year passed, when Philip was deprived of his office in great disgrace, so that being
reduced to a private station, he became the mockery of those whom he least desired to be the witnesses of
his fall. For in extreme distress of mind, groaning and trembling like Cain(3), and expecting every day that
some one would destroy him, far from his country and his friends, he died, like one astounded at his
misfortunes, in a manner that he least desired. Moreover these men spare not even after death those against
whom they have invented charges whilst living. They are so eager to shew themselves formidable to all,
that they banish the living, and shew no mercy on the dead; but alone of all the world they manifest their
hatred to them that are departed, and conspire against their friends, truly inhuman as they are, and haters of
that which is good, savage in temper beyond mere enemies, in behalf of their impiety, who eagerly plot the
ruin of me and of all the rest, with no regard to truth, but by false charges.

8. Restoration of the Catholics.

   Perceiving this to be the case, the three brothers, Constantine, Constantius, and Constans, caused all after
the death of their father to return to their own country and Church; and while they wrote letters concerning
the rest to their respective Churches, concerning Athanasius they wrote the following; which likewise
shews the violence of the whole proceedings, and proves the murderous disposition of Eusebius and his
fellows. A copy of the Letter of Constantine Caesar to the people of the Catholic Church in the city of the
Alexandrians.

   I suppose that it has not escaped the knowledge of your pious minds(4), &c.

   This is his letter; and what more credible witness of their conspiracy could there be than he, who
knowing these circumstances has thus written of them?


PART II: FIRST ARIAN PERSECUTION UNDER CONSTANTIUS.

   9. Eusebius and his fellows, however, seeing the declension of their heresy, wrote to Rome, as well as to
the Emperors Constantine and Constans, to accuse(1) Athanasius: but when the persons who were sent by
Athanasius disproved the statements which they had written, they were put to shame by the Emperors; and
Julius, Bishop of Rome, wrote to say(2) that a Council ought to be held, wherever we should desire, in
order that they might exhibit the charges which they had to make, and might also freely defend themselves
concerning those things of which they too were accused. The Presbyters also who were sent by them, when
they saw themselves making an exposure, requested that this might be done. Whereupon these men, whose
conduct is suspicious in all that they do, when they see that they are not likely to get the better in an
Ecclesiastical trial, betake themselves to Constantius alone, and thenceforth bewail themselves, as to the
patron of their heresy. 'Spare,' they say, 'the heresy; you see that all men have withdrawn from us; and very
few of us are now left. Begin to persecute, for we are being deserted even of those few, and are left
destitute. Those persons whom we forced over to our side, when these men were banished, they now by
their return have persuaded again to take part against us. Write letters therefore against them all, and send
out Philagrius a second time a as Prefect of Egypt, for he is able to carry on a persecution favourably for
us, as he has already shewn upon trial, and the more so, as he is an apostate. Send also Gregory as Bishop
to Alexandria, for he too is able to strengthen our heresy.'

10. Violent Intrusion of Gregory.

   Accordingly Constantius at once writes letters, and commences a persecution against all, and sends
Philagrius as Prefect with one Arsacius an eunuch; he sends also Gregory with a military force. And the
saint consequences followed as before 4. For gathering together a multitude of herdsmen and shepherds,
and other dissolute youths belonging to the town, armed with swords and clubs, they attacked in a body the
Church which is called the Church of Quirinus(5); and some they slew, some they trampled under foot,
others they beat with stripes and cast into prison or banished. They holed away many women also, and
dragged them openly into the court, and insulted them, dragging them by the hair. Some they proscribed;
from some they took away their bread(6) for no other reason, but that they might be induced to join the
Arians, and receive Gregory, who had been sent by the Emperor.

11. The Easterns decline the Council at Rome.

   Athanasius, however, before these things happened(6a), at the first report of their proceedings, sailed to
Rome, knowing the rage of the heretics, and for the purpose of having the Council held as had been
determined. And Julius wrote letters to them, and sent the Presbyters Elpidius and Philoxenus, appointing a
day(7), that they might either come, or consider themselves as altogether suspected persons. But as soon as
Eusebius and his fellows heard that the trial was to be an Ecclesiastical one, at which no Count would be
present, nor soldiers stationed before the doors, and that the proceedings would not be regulated by royal
order(for they have always depended upon these things to support them against the Bishops, and without
them they have no boldness even to speak); they were so alarmed that they detained the Presbyters till after
the pointed time, and pretended an unseemly excuse, that they were not able to come now on account of
the war which was begun by the Persians(8). But this was not the true cause of their delay, but the fears of
their own consciences. For what have Bishops to do with war? Or if they were unable on account of the
Persians to come to Rome, although it is at a distance and beyond sea, why did they like lions(9) go about
the parts of the East and those which are near the Persians, seeking who was opposed to them, that they
might falsely accuse and banish them?

   12. At any rate, when they had dismissed the Presbyters with this improbable excuse, they said to one
another, 'Since we are unable to get the advantage in an Ecclesiastical trial, let us exhibit our usual
audacity.' Accordingly they write to Philagrius, and cause him after a while to go out with Gregory into
Egypt. Whereupon the Bishops are severely scourged and cast into chains(1). Sarapammon, for in stance,
Bishop and Confessor, they drive into banishment; Potammon, Bishop and Confessor, who had lost an eye
in the persecution, they beat with stripes on the neck so cruelly, that he appeared to be dead before they
came to an end. In which condition he was cast aside, and hardly after some hours, being carefully attended
and fanned, he revived, God granting him his life; but a short time after he died of the sufferings caused by
the stripes, and attained in Christ to the glory of a second martyrdom. And besides these, how many monks
were scourged, while Gregory sat by with Balacius the 'Duke!' how many Bishops were wounded! how
many virgins were beaten!

13. Cruelties of Gregory at Alexandria.

   After this the wretched Gregory called upon all men to have communion with him. But if thou didst
demand of them communion, they were not worthy of stripes: and if thou didst scourge them as if evil
persons, why didst thou ask it of them as if holy? But he had no other end in view, except to fulfil the
designs of them that sent him, and to establish the heresy. Wherefore he became in his folly a murderer and
an executioner, injurious, crafty, and profane; in one word, an enemy of Christ. He so cruelly persecuted
the Bishop's aunt, that even when she died he would not suffer her to be buried(2). And this would have
been her lot; she would have been cast away without burial. had not they who attended on the corpse
carried her out as one of their own kindred. Thus even in such things he shewed his profane temper. And
again when the widows and other mendicants(3) had received alms, he commanded what had been given
them to be seized, and the vessels in which they carried their oil and wine to be broken, that he might not
only shew impiety by robbery, but in his deeds dishonour the Lord; from whom very shortly, he will hear
those words, 'Inasmuch as thou hast dishonoured these, thou hast dishonoured Me(5).'

14. Profaneness of Gregory and death of Balacius.

   And many other things he did, which exceed the power of language to describe, and which whoever
should hear would think to be incredible. And the reason why he acted thus was, because he had not
received his ordination according to ecclesiastical rule, nor had been called to be a Bishop by apostolical
tradition(6); but had been sent out from court with military power and pomp, as one entrusted with a
secular government. Wherefore he boasted rather to be the friend of Governors, than of Bishops and
Monks. Whenever, therefore, our Father Antony wrote to him from the mountains, as godliness is an
abomination to a sinner, so he abhorred the letters of the holy man. But whenever the Emperor, or a
General, or other magistrate, sent him a letter, he was as much overjoyed as those in the Proverbs, of whom
the Word has said indignantly, 'Woe unto them who leave the path of uprightness who rejoice to do evil,
and delight in the forwardness of the wicked(7).' And so he honoured with presents the bearers of these
letters; but once when Antony wrote to him he caused Duke Balacius to spit upon the letter, and to cast it
from him. But Divine Justice did not overlook this; for no long time after, when the Duke was on
horseback, and on his way to the first halt(8), the horse turned his head, and biting him on the thigh, threw
him off; and within three days he died.


PART III: RESTORATION OF THE CATHOLICS ON THE COUNCIL OF SARDICA.

   15. While they were proceeding in like measures towards all, at Rome about fifty Bishops assembled(1),
and denounced Eusebius and his fellows as persons suspected, afraid to come, and also condemned as
unworthy of credit the written statement they had sent; but us they received, and gladly embraced our
communion. While these things were taking place, a report of the Council held at Rome, and of the
proceedings against the Churches at Alexandria, and through all the East, came to the hearing of the
Emperor Constans(2). He writes to his brother Constantius, and immediately they both determine(3) that a
Council shall be called, and matters be brought to a settlement, so that those who had been injured may be
released from further suffering, and the injurious be no longer able to perpetrate such outrages.
Accordingly there assemble at the city of Sardica both from the East and West to the number of one
hundred and seventy Bishops(4), more or less; those who came from the West were Bishops only, having
Hosius for their father, but those from the East brought with them instructors of youth and advocates,
Count Musonianus, and Hesychius(5) the Castrensian; on whose account they came with great alacrity,
thinking that everything would be again managed by their authority. For thus by means of these persons
they have always shewn themselves formidable to any whom they wished to intimidate, and have
prosecuted their designs against whomsoever they chose. But when they arrived and saw that the cause was
to be conducted as simply an ecclesiastical one, without the interference of the Count or of soldiers; when
they saw the accusers who came from every church and city, and the evidence which was brought against
them, when they saw the venerable Bishops Arius and Asterius(6), who came up in their company,
withdrawing from them and siding with us(6a), and giving an account of their cunning, and how suspicious
their conduct was, and that they were fearing the consequences of a trial, lest they should be convicted by
us of being false informers, and it should be discovered by those whom they produced in the character of
accusers, that they had themselves suggested all they were to say, and were the contrivers of the plot.
Perceiving this to be the case, although they had come with great zeal, as thinking that we should be afraid
to meet them, yet now when they saw our alacrity, they shut themselves up in the Palace[7] (for they had
their abode there), and proceeded to confer with one another in the following manner: 'We came hither for
one result; and we see another; we arrived in company with Counts, and the trial is proceeding without
them. We are certainly condemned. You all know the orders that have been given. Athanasius and his
fellows have the reports of the proceedings in the Mareotis[8], by which he is cleared, and we are covered
with disgrace. Why then do we delay? why are we so slow? Let us invent some excuse and be gone, or we
shall be condemned if we remain. It is better to suffer the shame of fleeing, than the disgrace of being
convicted as false accusers. If we flee, we shall find some means of defending our heresy; and even if they
condemn us for our flight, still we have the Emperor as our patron, who will not suffer the people to expel
us from the Churches.'

16. Secession of the Easterns at Sardica.

   Thus then they reasoned with themselves and Hosius and all the other Bishops repeatedly signified to
them the alacrity of Athanasius and his fellows, saying, 'They are ready with their defence, and pledge
themselves to prove you false accusers.' They said also, 'If you fear the trial, why did you come to meet us?
either you ought not to have come, or now that you have come, not to flee.' When they heard this, being
still more alarmed, they had recourse to an excuse even more unseemly than that they pretended at
Antioch, viz. that they betook themselves to flight because the Emperor had written to them the news of his
victory over the Persians. And this excuse they were not ashamed to send by Eustathius a Presbyter of the
Sardican Church. But even thus their flight did not succeed according to their wishes; for immediately the
holy Council, of which the great Hosius was president, wrote to them plainly, saying, 'Either come forward
and answer the charges which are brought against you, for the false accusations which you have made
against others, or know that the Council will condemn you as guilty, and declare Athanasius and his
fellows free and clear from all blame.' Whereupon they were rather impelled to flight by the alarms of
conscience, than to compliance with the proposals of the letter; for when they saw those who had been
injured by them, they did not even turn their faces to listen to their words, but fled with greater speed.

17. Proceedings of the Council of Sardica.

   Under these disgraceful and unseemly circumstances their flight took place. And the holy Council,
which had been assembled out of more than five and thirty provinces, perceiving the malice of the Arians,
admitted Athanasius and his fellows to answer to the charges which the others had brought against them,
and to declare the sufferings which they had undergone. And when they had thus made their defence, as we
said before, they approved and so highly admired their conduct that they gladly embraced their
communion, and wrote letters to all quarters, to the diocese of each, and especially to Alexandria and
Egypt, and the Libyas, declaring Athanasius and his friends to be innocent, and free from all blame, and
their opponents to be calumniators, evil-doers, and everything rather than Christians. Accordingly they
dismissed them in peace; but depostal Stephanus and Menophantus, Acacius and George of Laodicea,
Ursacius and Valens, Theodorus and Narcissus. For against Gregory, who had been sent to Alexandria by
the Emperor, they put forth a proclamation to the effect that he had never been made a Bishop, and that he
ought not to be called a Christian. They therefore declared the ordinations which he professed to have
conferred to be void, and commanded that they should not be even named in the Church, on account of
their novel and illegal nature. Thus Athanasius and his friends were dismissed in peace (the letters
concerning them are inserted at the end on account of their length 9), and the Council was dissolved.

18. Arian Persecution after Sardica.

   But the deposed persons, who ought now to have remained quiet, with those who had separated after so
disgraceful a flight, were guilty of such conduct, that their former proceedings appear trifling in
comparison of these. For when the people of Adrianople would not have communion with them, as men
who had fled from the Council, and had proved culprits, they carried their complaints to the Emperor
Constantius, and succeeded in causing ten of the laity to be beheaded, belonging to the Manufactory of
arms[1] there, Philagrius, who was there again as Count, assisting their designs in this matter also. The
tombs of these persons, which we have seen in passing[1a] by, are in front of the city. Then as if they had
been quite successful, because they had fled lest they should be convicted of false accusation, they
prevailed with the Emperor to command whatsoever they wished to be done. Thus they caused two
Presbyters and three Deacons to be banished from Alexandria into Armenia As to Arius and Asteruis, the
one Bishop of Petr'[2] in Palestine, the other Bishop in Arabia, who had withdrawn from their party, they
not only banished into upper Libya, but also caused them to be treated with insult.

19. Tyrannical measures against the Alexandrians.

   And as to Lucius 3, Bishop of Adrianople, when they saw that he used great boldness of speech against
them, and exposed their impiety, they again, as they had done before, caused him to be bound with iron
chains on the neck and hands, and so drove him into banishment, where he died, as they know. And
Diodorus a Bishop[4] they remove; but against Olympius of Aeni, and Theodulus of Trajanople[5], both
Bishops of Thrace, good and orthodox men, when they perceived their hatred of the heresy, they brought
false charges. This Eusebius and his fellows had done first of all, and the Emperor Constantius wrote letters
on the subject; and next these men[6] revived the accusation. The purport of the letter was, that they should
not only be expelled from their cities and churches but should also suffer capital punishment wherever they
were discovered. However surprising this conduct may be, it is only in accordance with their principles; for
as being instructed by Eusebius and his fellows in such proceedings, and as heirs of their impiety and evil
principles, they wished to shew themselves formidable at Alexandria, as their fathers had done in Thrace.
They caused an order to be written, that the ports and gates of the cities should be watched, lest availing
themselves of, the permission granted by the Council, the banished persons should return to their churches.
They also cause orders to be sent to the magistrates at Alexandria, respecting Athanasius and certain
Presbyters, named therein, that if either the Bishop r, or any of the others, should be found coming to the
city or its borders, the magistrate should have power to behead those who were so discovered. Thus this
new Jewish heresy does not only deny the Lord, but has also learnt to commit murder.

20. Plot against the Catholic Legates at Antioch.

   Yet even after this they did not rest; but as the father of their heresy goeth about like a lion, seeking
whom he may devour, so these obtaining the use of the public posts[8] went about, and whenever they
found any that reproached them with their flight, and that hated the Arian heresy, they scourged them, cast
them into chains, and caused them to be banished from their country; and they rendered themselves so
formidable, as to induce many to dissemble, many to fly into the deserts, rather than willingly even to have
any dealings with them. Such were the enormities which their madness prompted them to commit after
their flight. Moreover they perpetrate another outrageous act, which is indeed in accordance with the
character of their heresy, but is such as we never heard of before, nor is likely soon to take place again,
even among the more dissolute of the Gentiles, much less among Christians. The holy Council had sent as
Legates the Bishops Vincentius[9] of Capua (this is the Metropolis of Campania), and Euphrates of
Agrippina[10] (this is the Metropolis of Upper Gaul), that they might obtain the Emperor's consent to the
decision of the Council, that the Bishops should return to their Churches, inasmuch as he was the author of
their expulsion. The most religious Constans had also written to his brother[1], and supported the cause of
the Bishops. But these admirable men, who are equal to any act of audacity, when they saw the two
Legates at Antioch, consulted together and formed a plot, which Stephanus[2] undertook by himself to
execute, as being a suitable instrument for such purposes. Accordingly they hire a common harlot, even at
the season of the most holy Easter, and stripping her introduce her by night into the apartment of the
Bishop Euphrates. The harlot who thought that it was a young man who had sent to invite her, at first
willingly accompanied them  but when they thrust her in, and she saw the man asleep and unconscious of
what was going on, and when presently she distinguished his features, and beheld the face of an old man,
and the array of a Bishop, she immediately cried aloud, and declared that violence was used towards her.
They desired her to be silent and to lay a false charge against the Bishop; and so when it was day, the
matter was noised abroad, and all the city ran together; and those who came from the Palace were in great
commotion, wondering at the report which had been spread abroad, and demanding that it should not be
passed by in silence. An enquiry, therefore, was made, and her master gave information concerning those
who came to fetch the harlot and these informed against Stephanus; for they were his Clergy. Stephanus,
therefore, is deposed[2a], and Leontius the eunuch appointed in his place, only that the Arian heresy may
not want a supporter.

21. Constantius' change of mind.

   And now the Emperor Constantius, feeling some compunctions, returned to himself; and concluding
from their conduct towards Euphrates, that their attacks upon the others were of the same kind, he gives
orders that the Presbyters and Deacons who had been banished from Alexandria into Armenia should
immediately be released. He also writes publicly to Alexandria[3], commanding that the clergy and laity
who were friends of Athanasius should suffer no further persecution. And when Gregory died about ten
months[3a] after, he sends for Athanasius with every mark of honour, writing to him no less than three
times a very friendly letter[4] in which he exhorted him to take courage and come. He sends also a
Presbyter and a Deacon, that he may be still further encouraged to return; for he thought that, through
alarm at what had taken place before, I[5] did not care to return. Moreover he writes to his brother
Constans, that he also would exhort me to return. And he affirmed that he had been expecting Athanasius a
whole year, and that he would not permit any change to be made, or any ordination to take place, as he was
preserving the Churches for Athanasius their Bishop.

22. Athanasius visits Constantius.

   When therefore he wrote in this strain, and encouraged him by means of many (for he caused Polemius,
Dotianus, Bardion, Thalassus[6], Taurus[7], and Florentius, his Counts, in whom Athanasius could best
confide, to write also): Athanasius committing the whole matter to God, who had stirred the conscience of
Constantius to do this, came with his friends to him; and he gave him a favourable audience[7a], and sent
him away to go to his country and his Churches, writing at the same time to the magistrates in the several
places, that whereas he had before commanded the ways to be guarded, they should now grant him a free
passage. Then when the Bishop complained of the sufferings he had undergone, and of the letters which
the Emperor had written against him, and besought him that the false accusations against him might not be
revived by his enemies after his departure, saying[8], 'If you please, summon these persons; for as far as we
are concerned they are at liberty to stand forth, and we will expose their conduct;' he would not do this, but
commanded that whatever had been before slanderously written against him should all be destroyed and
obliterated, affirming that he would never again listen to any such accusations, and that his purpose was
fixed and unalterable. This he did not simply say, but sealed his words with oaths, calling upon God to be
witness of them. And so encouraging him with many other words, and desiring him to be of good courage,
he sends the following letters to the Bishops and Magistrates.

23. Constantius Augustus, the Great, the Conqueror, to the Bishops and Clergy of the Catholic Church.

   The most Reverend Athanasius has not been deserted by the grace of God [9: v. Apol contr. Arian.
(PNII4-7.TXT) # 54.], &c.

Another Letter.

   From Constantius to the people of Alexandria.

   Desiring as we do your welfare in all respects[10: v. Apol contr. Arian. (PNII4-7.TXT) # 55.], &c.

Another Letter.

   Constantius Augustus, the Conqueror, to Nestorius, Prefect of Egypt.

   It is well known that an order was heretofore given by us, and that certain documents are to be found
prejudicial to the estimation of the most reverend Bishop Athanasius; and that these exist among the
Orders[1] of your worship. Now we desire your Sobriety, of which we have good proof, to transmit to our
Court, in compliance with this our order, all the letters respecting the fore-mentioned person, which are
found in your Order-book.

   24. The following is the letter which he wrote after the death of the blessed Constans. It was written in
Latin, and is here translated into Greek[2].

   Constantius Augustus, the Conqueror, to Athanasius.

   It is not unknown to your Prudence, that it was my constant prayer, that prosperity might attend my late
brother Constans in all his undertakings; and your wisdom may therefore imagine how greatly I was
afflicted when I learnt that he had been taken off by most unhallowed hands. Now whereas there are certain
persons who at the present truly mournful time are endeavouring to alarm you, I have therefore thought it
fight to address this letter to your Constancy, to exhort you that, as becomes a Bishop, you would teach the
people those things which pertain to the divine religion, and that, as you are accustomed to do, you would
employ your time in prayers together with them, and not give credit to vain rumours, whatever they may
be. For our fixed determination is, that you should continue, agreeably to our desire, to perform the office
of a Bishop in your own place. May Divine Providence preserve you, most beloved parent, many years.

25. Return of Athanasius from second exile.

   Under these circumstances, when they had at length taken their leave, and begun their journey, those
who were friendly rejoiced to see a friend; but of the other party, some were confounded at the sight of
him; others not having the confidence to appear, hid themselves; and others repented of what they had
written against the Bishop. Thus all the Bishops of Palestine[3], except some two or three, and those men
of suspected character, so willingly received Athanasius, and embraced communion with him, that they
wrote to excuse themselves, on the ground that in what they had formerly written, they had acted, not
according to their own wishes, but by compulsion. Of the Bishops of Egypt and the Libyan provinces, of
the laity both of those countries and of Alexandria, it is superfluous for me to speak. They all ran together,
and were possessed with unspeakable delight, that they had not only received their friends alive contrary to
their hopes; but that they were also delivered from the heretics who were as tyrants and as raging dogs
towards them. Accordingly great was their joy[5], the people in the congregations encouraging one another
in virtue. How many unmarried women, who were before ready to enter upon marriage, now remained
virgins to Christ! How many young men, seeing the examples of others, embraced the monastic life! How
many fathers persuaded their children, and how many were urged by their children, not to be hindered from
Christian asceticism! How many wives persuaded their husbands, and how many were persuaded by their
husbands, to give themselves to prayer[6], as the Apostle has spoken How many widows and how many
orphans, who were before hungry and naked, now through the great zeal of the people, were no longer
hungry, and went forth clothed! In a word, so great was their emulation in virtue, that you would have
thought every family and every house a Church, by reason of the goodness of its inmates, and the prayers
which were offered to God. And in the Churches there was a profound and wonderful peace, while the
Bishops wrote from all quarters, and received from Athanasius the customary letters of peace.

26. Recantation of Ursacius and Valens.

   Moreover Ursacius and Valens, as if suffering the scourge of conscience, came to another mind, and
wrote to the Bishop himself a friendly and peaceable letter[7], although they had received no
communication from him. And going up to Rome they repented, and confessed that all their proceedings
and assertions against him were rounded in falsehood and mere calumny. And they not only voluntarily did
this, but also anathematized the Arian heresy, and presented a written declaration of their repentance,
addressing to the Bishop Julius the following letter in Latin, which has been translated into Greek. The
copy was sent to us in Latin by Paul[8], Bishop of Treveri.

Translation from the Latin.

   Ursacius and Valens to my Lord the most blessed Pope Julius.

   Whereas it is well known that we[9: v. Apol. contr. Ar. (PNII4-7.TXT), #58] &c.

Translation from the Latin.

   The Bishops Ursacius and Valens to my Lord and Brother, the Bishop Athanasius.

   Having an opportunity of sending[10: v. Apol. contr. Ar. (PNII4-7.TXT), #58], &c.

After writing these, they also subscribed the letters of peace which were presented to them by Peter and
Iren'us, Presbyters of Athanasius, and by Ammonius a layman, who were passing that way, although
Athanasius had sent no communication to them even by these persons.

27. Triumph of Athanasius.

   Now who was not filled with admiration at witnessing these things, and the great peace that prevailed in
the Churches? who did not rejoice to see the concord of so many Bishops? who did not glorify the Lord,
beholding the delight of the people in their assemblies? How many enemies repented! How many excused
themselves who had formerly accused him falsely! How many who formerly hated him, now shewed
affection for him! How many of those who had written against him, recanted their assertions? Many also
who had sided with the Arians, not through choice but by necessity, came by night and excused
themselves. They anathematized the heresy, and besought him to pardon them, because, although through
the plots and calumnies of these men they appeared bodily on their side, yet in their hearts they held
communion with Athanasius, and were always with him. Believe me, this is true.


PART IV: SECOND ARIAN PERSECUTION UNDER CONSTANTIUS.

   28. But the inheritors of the opinions and impiety of Eusebius and his fellows, the eunuch Leontius[1],
who ought not to remain in communion even as a layman[2], because he mutilated himself that he might
henceforward be at liberty to sleep with one Eustolium, who is a wife as far as he is concerned, but is
called a virgin; and George and Acacius, and Theodorus, and Narcissus, who are deposed by the Council;
when they heard and saw these things, were greatly ashamed. And when they perceived the unanimity and
peace that existed between Athanasius and the Bishops (they were more than four hundred 3, from great
Rome, and all Italy, from Calabria, Apulia, Campania, Bruttia, Sicily, Sardinia, Corsica, and the whole of
Africa; and those from Gaul, Britain, and Spain, with the great Confessor Hosius; and also those from
Pannonia, Noricum, Siscia, Dalmatia, Dardania, Dacia, Moesia, Macedonia, Thessaly, and all Achaia, and
from Crete, Cyprus, and Lycia, with most of those from Palestine, Isauria, Egypt, the Thebais, the whole of
Libya, and Pentapolis); when I say they perceived these things, they were possessed with envy and fear;
with envy, on account of the communion of so many together; and with fear, lest those who had been
entrapped by them should be brought over by the unanimity of so great a number, and henceforth their
heresy should be triumphantly exposed, and everywhere proscribed.

29. Relapse of Ursacius and Valens.

   First of all they persuade Ursacius, Valens and their fellows to change sides again, and like dogs[4] to
return to their own vomit, and like swine to wallow again in the former mire of their impiety; and they
make this excuse for their retractation, that they did it through fear of the most religious Constans. And yet
even had there been cause for fear, yet if they had confidence in what they had done, they ought not to
have become traitors to their friends. But when there was no cause for fear, and yet they were guilty of a
lie, are they not deserving of utter condemnation? For no soldier was present, no Palatine or Notary[5] had
been sent, as they now send them, nor yet was the Emperor there, nor had they been invited by any one,
when they wrote their recantation. But they voluntarily went up to Rome, and of their own accord recanted
and wrote it down in the Church, where there was no fear from without, where the only fear is the fear of
God, and where every one has liberty of conscience. And yet although they have a second time become
Arians, and then have devised this unseemly excuse for their conduct, they are still without shame.

30. Constantius changes sides again.

   In the next place they went in a body to the Emperor Constantius, and besought him, saying, 'When we
first made our request to you, we were not believed; for we told you, when you sent for Athanasius, that by
inviting him to come forward, you are expelling our heresy. For he has been opposed to it from the very
first, and never ceases to anathematize it. He has already written letters against us into all parts of the
world, and the majority of men have embraced communion with him; and even of those who seemed to be
on our side, some have been gained over by him, and others are likely to be. And we are left alone, so that
the fear is, lest the character of our heresy become known, and henceforth both we and you gain the name
of heretics. And if this come to pass, you must take care that we be not classed with the Manichaeans.
Therefore begin again to persecute, and support the heresy, for it accounts you its king.' Such was the
language of their iniquity. And the Emperors when in his passage through the country on his hasty march
against Magnentius[6], he saw the communion of the Bishops with Athanasius, like one set on fire,
suddenly changed his mind, and no longer remembered his oaths but was alike forgetful of what he had
written and regardless of the duty he owed his brother. For in his letters to him, as well as in his interview
with Athanasius, he took oaths that he would not act otherwise than as the people should wish, and as
should be agreeable to the Bishops. But his zeal for impiety caused him at once to forget all these things.
And yet one ought not to wonder that after so many letters and so many oaths Constantius had altered his
mind, when we remember that Pharaoh of old the tyrant of Egypt, after frequently promising and by that
means obtaining a remission of his punishments, likewise changed, until he at last perished together with
his associates.

31. Constantius begins to persecute.

   He compelled then the people in every city to change their party; and on arriving at Aries and Milan[7],
he proceeded to act entirely in accordance with the designs and suggestions of the heretics; or rather they
acted themselves, and receiving authority from him, furiously attacked every one. Letters and orders were
immediately sent hither to the Prefect, that for the future the corn should be taken from Athanasius and
given to those who favoured the Arian doctrines, and that whoever pleased might freely insult them that
held communion with him; and the magistrates were threatened if they did not hold communion with the
Arians. These things were but the prelude to what afterwards took place under the direction of the Duke
Syrianus. Orders were sent also to the more distant parts, and Notaries despatched to every city, and
Palatines, with threats to the Bishops and Magistrates, directing the Magistrates to urge on the Bishops, and
informing the Bishops that either they must subscribe against Athanasius, and hold communion with the
Arians, or themselves undergo the punishment of exile, while the people who took part with them were to
understand that chains, and insults, and scourgings, and the loss of their possessions, would be their
portion. These orders were not neglected, for the commissioners had in their company the Clergy of
Ursacius and Valens, to inspire them with zeal, and to inform the Emperor if the Magistrates neglected
their duty. The other heresies, as younger sisters of their own[8], they permitted to blaspheme the Lord,
and only conspired against the Christians, not enduring to hear orthodox language concerning Christ. How
many Bishops in consequence, according to the words of Scripture, were brought before rulers and
kings[9], and received this sentence from magistrates, 'Subscribe, or withdraw from your churches, for the
Emperor has commanded you to be deposed! 'How many in every city were roughly handled, lest they
should accuse them as friends of the Bishops! Moreover letters were sent to the city authorities, and a
threat of a fine was held out to them, if they did not compel the Bishops of their respective cities to
subscribe. In short, every place and every city was full of fear and confusion, while the Bishops were
dragged along to trial, and the magistrates witnessed the lamentations and groans of the people.

32. Persecution by Constantius.

   Such were the proceedings of the Palatine commissioners; on the other hand, those admirable persons,
confident in the patronage which they had obtained, display great zeal, and cause some of the Bishops to be
summoned before the Emperor, while they persecute others by letters, inventing charges against them; to
the intent that the one might be overawed by the presence of Constantius, and the other, through fear of the
commissioners and the threats held out to them in these pretended accusations, might be brought to
renounce their orthodox and pious opinions. In this manner it was that the Emperor forced so great a
multitude of Bishops, partly by threats, and partly by promises, to declare, 'We will no longer hold
communion with Athanasius.' For those who came for an interview, were not admitted to his presence, nor
allowed any relaxation, not so much as to go out of their dwellings, until they had either subscribed, or
refused and incurred banishment thereupon. And this he did because he saw that the heresy was hateful to
all men. For this reason especially he compelled so many to add their names to the small number[1] of the
Arians, his earnest desire being to collect together a crowd of names, both from envy of the Bishop, and for
the sake of making a shew in favour of the Arian impiety, of which he is the patron; supposing that he will
be able to alter the truth, as easily as he can influence the minds of men. He knows not, nor has ever read,
how that the Sadducees and the Herodians, taking unto them the Pharisees, were not able to obscure the
truth; rather it shines out thereby more brightly every day, while they crying out, 'We have no king but
Caesar[2],' and obtaining the judgment of Pilate in their favour, are nevertheless left destitute, and wait in
utter shame, expecting shortly[3] to become bereft, like the partridge[4], when they shall see their patron
near his death.

33. Persecution is from the Devil

   Now if it was altogether unseemly in any of the Bishops to change their opinions merely from fear of
these things, yet it was much more so, and not the part of men who have confidence in what they believe,
to force and compel the unwilling. In this manner it is that the Devil, when he has no truth on his sides,
attacks and breaks down the doors of them that admit him with axes and hammers[6]. But our Saviour is so
gentle that He teaches thus, 'If any man wills to come after Me,' and, 'Whoever wills to be My disciple[7];'
and coming to each He does not force them, but knocks at the door and says, 'Open unto Me, My sister, My
spouse[8];' and if they open to Him, He enters in, but if they delay and will not, He departs from them. For
the truth is not preached with swords or with darts, nor by means of soldiers; but by persuasion and
counsel. But what persuasion is there where fear of the Emperor prevails? or what counsel is there, when
he who withstands them receives at last banishment and death? Even David, although he was a king, and
had his enemy in his power, prevented not the soldiers by an exercise of authority when they wished to kill
his enemy, but, as the Scripture says, David persuaded his men by arguments, and suffered them not to rise
up and put Saul to death[1]. But he, being without arguments of reason, forces all men by his power, that it
may be shewn to all, that their wisdom is not according to God, but merely human, and that they who
favour the Arian doctrines have indeed no king but Caesar; for by his means it is that these enemies of
Christ accomplish whatsoever they wish to do. But while they thought that they were carrying on their
designs against many by his means, they knew not that they were making many to be confessors, of whom
are those who have lately[2] made so glorious a confession, religious men, and excellent Bishops,
Paulinus[3] Bishop of Treveri, the metropolis of the Gauls, Lucifer, Bishop of the metropolis of Sardinia,
Eusebius of Vercelli in Italy, and Dionysius of Milan, which is the metropolis of Italy. These the Emperor
summoned before him, and commanded them to subscribe against Athanasius, and to hold communion
with the heretics; and when they were astonished at this novel procedure, and said that there was no
Ecclesiastical Canon to this effect, he immediately said, 'Whatever I will, be that esteemed a Canon; the
"Bishops" of Syria let me thus speak. Either then obey, or go into banishment.'

34. Banishment of the Western Bishops spread the knowledge of the truth.

   When the Bishops heard this they were utterly amazed, and stretching forth their hands to God, they
used great boldness of speech against him teaching him that the kingdom was not his, but God's, who had
given it to him, Whom also they bid him fear, lest He should suddenly take it away from him. And they
threatened him with the day of judgment, and warned him against infringing Ecclesiastical order, and
mingling Roman sovereignty with the constitution[4] of the Church, and against introducing the Arian
heresy into the Church of God. But he would not listen to them, nor permit them to speak further, but
threatened them so much the more, and drew his sword against them, and gave orders for some of them to
be led to execution; although afterwards, like Pharaoh, he repented. The holy men therefore shaking off the
dust, and looking up to God, neither feared the threats of the Emperor, nor betrayed their cause before his
drawn sword; but received their banishment, as a service pertaining to their ministry. And as they passed
along, they preached the Gospel in every place and city[5], although they were in bonds, proclaiming the
orthodox faith, anathematizing the Arian heresy, and stigmatizing the recantation of Ursacius and Valens.
But this was contrary to the intention of their enemies; for the greater was the distance of their place of
banishment, so much the more was the hatred against them increased, while the wanderings of these men
were but the heralding of their impiety. For who that saw them as they passed along, did not greatly admire
them as Confessors, and renounce and abominate the others, calling them not only impious men, but
executioners and murderers, and everything rather than Christians ?


PART V: PERSECUTION AND LAPSE OF LIBERIUS.

   35. Now it had been better if from the first Constantius had never become connected with this heresy at
all; or being connected with it if he had not yielded so much to those impious men; or having yielded to
them, if he had stood by them only thus far, so that judgment might come upon them all for these atrocities
alone. But as it would seem, like madmen, having fixed themselves in the bonds of impiety, they are
drawing down upon their own heads a more severe judgment. Thus from the first[1] they spared not even
Liberius, Bishop of Rome, but extended[2] their fury even to those parts; they respected not his bishopric,
because it was an Apostolical throne; they felt no reverence for Rome, because she is the Metropolis of
Romania[3]; they remembered not that formerly in their letters they had spoken of her Bishops as
Apostolical men. But confounding all things together, they at once forgot everything, and cared only to
shew their zeal in behalf of impiety. When they perceived that he was an orthodox man and hated the Arian
heresy, and earnestly endeavoured to persuade all persons to renounce and withdraw from it these impious
men reasoned thus with themselves: 'If we can persuade Liberius, we shall soon prevail over all.'
Accordingly they accused him falsely before the Emperor; and he, expecting easily to draw over all men to
his side by means of Liberius, writes to him, and sends a certain eunuch called Eusebius with letters and
offerings, to cajole him with the presents, and to threaten him with the letters. The eunuch accordingly
went to Rome, and first proposed to Liberius to subscribe against Athanasius, and to hold communion with
the Arians, saying, 'The Emperor wishes it, and commands you to do so.' And then shewing him the
offerings, he took him by the hand, and again besought him saying, 'Obey the Emperor, and receive these.'

36. The Eunuch Eusebius attempts Liberius in vain.

   But the Bishop endeavoured to convince him, reasoning with him thus: 'How is it possible for me to do
this against Athanasius? how can we condemn a man, whom not one [4] Council only, but a seconds
assembled from all parts of the world, has fairly acquitted, and whom the Church of the Romans dismissed
in peace? who will approve of our conduct, if we reject in his absence one, whose presence[6] amongst us
we gladly welcomed, and admitted him to our communion? This is no Ecclesiastical Canon; nor have we
had transmitted to us any such tradition[7] from the Fathers, who in their turn received from the great and
blessed Apostle Peter s. But if the Emperor is really concerned for the peace of the Church, if he requires
our letters respecting Athanasius to be reversed, let their proceedings both against him and against all the
others be reversed also; and then let an Ecclesiastical Council be called at a distance from the Court, at
which the Emperor shall not be present, nor any Count be admitted, nor magistrate to threaten us, but
where only the fear of God and the Apostolical rule shall prevail; that so in the first place, the faith of the
Church may be secure, as the Fathers defined it in the Council of Nicaea, and the supporters of the Arian
doctrines may be cast out, and their heresy anathematized. And then after that, an enquiry being made into
the charges brought against Athanasius, and any other besides, as well as into those things of which the
other party is accused, let the culprits be cast out, and the innocent receive encouragement and support. For
it is impossible that they who maintain an impious creed can be admitted as members of a Council: nor is it
fit that an enquiry into matters of conduct should precede the enquiry concerning the faith[1]; but all
diversity of opinions on points of faith ought first to be eradicated, and then the enquiry made into matters
of conduct. Our Lord Jesus Christ did not heal them that were afflicted, until they shewed and declared
what faith they had in Him. These things we have received from the Fathers; these report to the Emperor;
for they are both profitable for him and edifying to the Church. But let not Ursacius and Valens be listened
to, for they have retracted their former assertions, and in what they now say they are not to be trusted.'

37. Liberius refuses the Emperors offering.

   These were the words of the Bishop Liberius. And the eunuch, who was vexed, not so much because he
would not subscribe as because he found him an enemy to the heresy, forgetting that he was in the presence
of a Bishop, after threatening him severely, went away with the offerings; and next commits an offence,
which is foreign to a Christian, and too audacious for a eunuch. In imitation of the transgression of Saul, he
went to the Martyry[2] of the Apostle Peter, and then presented the offerings. But Liberius having notice of
it, was very angry with the person who kept the place, that he had not prevented him, and cast out the
offerings as an unlawful sacrifice, which increased the anger of the mutilated creature against him.
Consequently he exasperates the Emperor against him, saying, 'The matter that concerns us is no longer the
obtaining the subscription of Liberius, but the fact that he is so resolutely opposed to the heresy, that he
anathematizes the Arians by name.' He also stirs up the other eunuchs to say the same; for many of those
who were about Constantius, or rather the whole number of them, are eunuchs 3, who engross all the
influence with him, and it is impossible to do anything there without them. The Emperor accordingly
writes to Rome, and again Palatines, and Notaries, and Counts are sent off with letters to the Prefect, in
order that either they may inveigle Liberius by stratagem away from Rome and send him to the Court to
him, or else persecute him by violence.

38. The evil influence of Eunuchs at Court.

   Such being the tenor of the letters, there also fear and treachery forthwith became rife throughout the
whole city. How many were the families against which threats were held out! How many received great
promises on condition of their acting against Liberius! How many Bishops hid themselves when they saw
these things! How many noble women retired to country places in consequence of the, calumnies of the
enemies of Christ! How many ascetics were made the objects of their plots I How many who were
sojourning there, and had made that place their home, did they cause to be persecuted! How often and how
strictly did they guard the harbour[4] and the approaches to the gates, lest any orthodox person should
enter and visit Liberius! Rome also had trial of the enemies of Christ, and now experienced what be(ore she
would not believe, when she heard how the other Churches in every city were ravaged by them. It was the
eunuchs who instigated these proceedings against all. And the most remarkable circumstance in the matter
is this; that the Arian heresy which denies the Son of God, receives its support from eunuchs, who, as both
their bodies are fruitless, and their souls barren of virtue, cannot bear even to hear the name of son. The
Eunuch of Ethiopia indeed, though he understood not what he reads, believed the words of Philip, when he
taught him concerning the Saviour; but the eunuchs of Constantius cannot endure the confession of
Peter[6], nay, they turn away when the Father manifests the Son, and madly rage against those who say,
that the Son of God is His genuine Son, thus claiming as a heresy of eunuchs, that there is no genuine and
true offspring of the Father. On these grounds it is that the law forbids such persons to be admitted into any
ecclesiastical Council[7]; notwithstanding which they have now regarded these as competent judges of
ecclesiastical causes, and whatever seems good to them, that Constantius decrees, while men with the name
of Bishops dissemble with them. Oh! who shall be their historian? who shall transmit the record of these
things to another generation? who indeed would believe it, were he to hear it, that eunuchs who are
scarcely entrusted with household services (for theirs is a pleasure-loving race, that has no serious concern
but that of hindering in others what nature has taken from them); that these, I say, now exercise authority in
ecclesiastical matters, and that Constantius in submission to their will treacherously conspired against all,
and banished Liberius!

39. Liberius's speech to Constantius.

   For after the Emperor had frequently written to Rome, had threatened, sent commissioners, devised
schemes, on the persecution[7a] subsequently breaking out at Alexandria, Liberius is dragged before him,
and uses great boldness of speech towards him. 'Cease,' he said, 'to persecute the Christians; attempt not by
my means to introduce impiety into the Church. We are ready to suffer anything rather than to be called
Arian madmen. We are Christians; compel us not to become enemies of Christ. We also give you this
counsel: fight not against Him who gave you this empire, nor show impiety towards Him instead of
thankfulness[8]; persecute not them that believe in Him, lest you also hear the words, 'It is hard for thee to
kick against the pricks[9].' Nay, I would that you might hear them, that you might obey, as the holy Paul
did. Behold, here we are; we are come, before they fabricate charges. For this cause we hastened hither,
knowing that banishment awaits us at your hands, that we might suffer before a charge encounters us, add
that all may clearly see that all the others too have suffered as we shall suffer, and that the charges brought
against them were fabrications of their enemies, and all their proceedings were mere calumny and
falsehood.'

40. Banishment of Liberius and others.

   These were the words of Liberius at that time, and he was admired by all men for them. But the Emperor
instead of answering[9a], only gave orders for their banishment, separating each of them from the rest, as
he had done in the former cases. For he had himself devised this plan in the banishments which he
inflicted, that so the severity of his punishments might be greater than that of former tyrants and
persecutors[1]. In the former persecution Maximian, who was then Emperor, commanded a number of
Confessors to be banished together[2], and thus lightened their punishment by the consolation which he
gave them in each other's society. But this man was more savage than he; he separated those who had
spoken boldly and confessed together, he put asunder those who were united by the bond of faith, that
when they came to die they might not see one another; thinking that bodily separation can disunite also the
affections of the mind, and that being severed from each other, they would forget the concord and
unanimity which existed among them. He knew not that however each one may remain a apart from the
rest, he has nevertheless with him that Lord, whom they confessed in one body together, who will also
provide (as he did in the case of the Prophet Elisha[4]) that more shall be with each of them, than there are
soldiers with Constantius. Of a truth iniquity is blind I for in that they thought to afflict the Confessors, by
separating them from one another, they rather brought thereby a great injury upon themselves. For had they
continued in each other's company, and abode together, the pollutions of those impious men would have
been proclaimed from one place only; but now by putting them asunder, they have made their impious
heresy and wickedness to spread abroad and become known in every place.

41. Lapse of Liberius.

   Who that shall hear what they did in the course of these proceedings will not think them to be anything
rather than Christians? When Liberius sent Eutropius, a Presbyter, and Hilarius, a Deacon, with letters to
the Emperor, at the time that Lucifer and his fellows made their confession, they banished the Presbyter on
the spot, and after stripping Hilarius[6] the Deacon and scourging him on the back, they banished him too,
clamouring at him, 'Why didst thou not resist Liberius instead of being the bearer of letters from him.'
Ursacius and Valens, with the eunuchs who sided with them, were the authors of this outrage. The Deacon,
while he was being scourged, praised the Lord, remembering His words, 'I gave My back to the smiters[7];'
but they while they scourged him laughed and mocked him, feeling no shame that they were insulting a
Levitt. Indeed they acted but consistently in laughing while he continued to praise God; for it is the part of
Christians to endure stripes, but to scourge Christians is the outrage of a Pilate or a Caiaphas. Thus they
endeavoured at the first to corrupt the Church of the Romans, wishing to introduce impiety into it as well
as others. But Liberius after he had been gin banishment two years gave way, and from fear of threatened
death subscribed. Yet even this only shews their violent conduct, and the hatred of Liberius against the
heresy, and his support of Athanasius, so long as he was suffered to exercise a free choice. For that which
men are forced by torture to do contrary to their first judgment, ought not to be considered the willing deed
of those who are in fear, but rather of their tormentors. They however attempted everything in support of
their heresy, while the people in every Church, preserving the faith which they had learnt, waited for the
return of their teachers, and condemned the Antichristian heresy, and all avoid it, as they would a serpent.


PART VI: PERSECUTION AND LAPSE OF HOSlUS.

   42. But although they had done all this, yet these impious men thought they had accomplished nothing,
so long as the great Hosius escaped their wicked machinations. And now they undertook to extend their
fury[1] to that great old man. They felt no shame at the thought that he is the father[2] of the Bishops; they
regarded not that he had been a Confessor[3]; they reverenced not the length of his Episcopate, in which he
had continued more than sixty years; but they set aside everything, and looked only to the interests of their
heresy, as being of a truth such as neither fear God, nor regard man[4]. Accordingly they went to
Constantius, and again employed such arguments as the following: 'We have done everything; we have
banished the Bishop of the Romans; and before him a very great number of other Bishops, and have filled
every place with alarm. But these strong measures of yours are as nothing to us, nor is our success at all
more secure, so long as Hosius remains. While he is in his own place, the rest also continue in their
Churches, for he is able by his arguments and his faith to persuade all men against us. He is the president of
Councils[5], and his letters are everywhere attended to. He it was who put forth the Nicene Confession, and
proclaimed everywhere that the Arians were heretics. If therefore he is suffered to remain, the banishment
of the rest is of no avail, for our heresy will be destroyed. Begin then to persecute him also and spare him
not, ancient as he is. Our heresy knows not to honour even the hoary hairs of the aged.'

43. Brave resistance of Hosius.

   Upon hearing this, the Emperor no longer delayed, but knowing the man, and the dignity of his years,
wrote to summon him. This was when he first[6] began his attempt upon Liberius. Upon his arrival he
desired him, and urged him with the usual arguments, with which he thought also to deceive the others, that
he would subscribe against us, and hold! communion with the Arians. But the old man, scarcely bearing to
hear the words, and grieved that he had even ventured to utter such a proposal, severely rebuked him, and
after gaining his consent, withdrew to his own country and Church. But the heretics still complaining, and
instigating him to proceed (he had the eunuchs also to remind him and to urge him further), the Emperor
again wrote in threatening terms but still Hosius, while he endured their insults was unmoved by any fear
of their designs against him, and remaining firm to his purpose, as one who had built the house of his faith
upon the rock, he spake boldly against the heresy, regarding the threats held out to him in the letters but as
drops of rain and blasts of wind. And although Constantius wrote frequently, sometimes flattering him with
the title of Father, and sometimes threatening and recounting the names of those who had been banished,
and saying, 'Will you continue the only person to oppose the heresy? Be persuaded and subscribe against
Athanasius; for whoever subscribes against him thereby embraces with us the Arian cause;' still Hosius
remained fearless, and while suffering these insults, wrote an answer in such terms as these. We have read
the letter, which is placed at the end[7].

44. 'Hosius to Constantius the Emperor sends health in the Lord.

   I was a Confessor at the first, when a persecution arose in the time of your grandfather Maximian; and if
you shall persecute me, I am ready now, too, to endure anything rather than to shed innocent blood and to
betray the truth. But I cannot approve of your conduct in writing after this threatening manner. Cease to
write thus; adopt not the cause of Arius, nor listen to those in the East, nor give credit to Ursacius, Valens
and their fellows. For whatever they assert, it is not on account of Athanasius, but for the sake of their own
heresy. Believe my statement, O Constantius, who am of an age to be your grandfather. I was present at the
Council of Sardica, when you and your brother Constans of blessed memory assembled us all together; and
on my own account I challenged the enemies of Athanasius, when they came to the church where I
abode[8], that if they had anything against him they might declare it; desiring them to have confidence, and
not to expect otherwise than that a right judgment would be passed in all things. This I did once and again,
requesting them, if they were unwilling to appear before the whole Council, yet to appear before me alone;
promising them also, that if he should be proved guilty, he should certainly be rejected by us; but if he
should be found to be blameless, and should prove them to be calumniators, that if they should then refuse
to hold communion with him, I would persuade him to go with me into the Spains. Athanasias was willing
to comply with these conditions, and made no objection to my proposal; but they, altogether distrusting
their cause, would not consent. And on another occasion Athanasius came to your Court[9], when you
wrote for him, and his enemies being at the time in Antioch, he requested that they might be summoned
either altogether or separately, in order that they might either convict him, or be convicted[10], and might
either in his presence prove him to be what they represented, or cease to accuse him when absent. To this
proposal also you would not listen, and they equally rejected it. Why then do you still give ear to them that
speak evil of him? How can you endure Valens and Ursacius, although they have retracted and made a
written confession of their calumnies[1]? For it is not true, as they pretend, that they were forced to
confess; there were no soldiers at hand to influence them your brother was not cognizant of the matter[2].
No, such things were not done under his government, as are done now; God forbid. But they voluntarily
went up to Rome, and in the presence of the Bishop and Presbyters wrote their recantation, having
previously addressed to Athanasius a friendly and peaceable letter. And if they pretend that force was
employed towards them, and acknowledge that this is an evil thing, which you also disapprove of; then do
you cease to use force; write no letters, send no Counts; but release those that have been banished, lest
while you are complaining of violence, they do but exercise greater violence. When was any such thing
done by Constans? What Bishop suffered banishment? When did he appear as arbiter of an Ecclesiastical
trial? When did any Palatine of his compel men to subscribe against any one, that Valens and his fellows
should be able to affirm this? Cease these proceedings, I beseech you, and remember that you are a mortal
man. Be afraid of the day of judgment, and keep yourself pure thereunto. Intrude not yourself into
Ecclesiastical matters, neither give commands unto us concerning them; but learn them from us. God has
put into your hands the kingdom; to us He has entrusted the affairs of His Church; and as he who would
steal the empire from you would resist the ordinance of God, so likewise fear on your part lest by taking
upon yourself the government of the Church, you become guilty of a great offence. It is written, "Render
unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's[3]." Neither therefore is it
permitted unto us to exercise an earthly rule, nor have you, Sire, any authority to burn incense[4]. These
things I write unto you out of a concern for your salvation. With regard to the subject of your letters, this is
my determination; I will not unite myself to the Arians; I anathematize their heresy. Neither will I
subscribe against, Athanasius, whom both we and the Church of the Romans and the whole Council
pronounced to be guiltless. And yourself also, when you understood this, sent for the man, and gave him
permission to return with honour to his country and his Church. What reason then can there be for so great
a change in your conduct? The same persons who were his enemies before, are so now also; and the things
they now whisper to his prejudice (for they do not declare them openly in his presence), the same they
spoke against him, before you sent for him; the same they spread abroad concerning him when they come
to the Council. And when I required them to come forward, as I have before said, they were unable to
produce their proofs; had they possessed any, they would not have fled so disgracefully. Who then
persuaded you so long after to forget your own letters and declarations? Forbear, and be not influenced by
evil men, lest while you act for the mutual advantage of yourself and them, you render yourself
responsible, For here you comply with their desires, hereafter in the judgment you will have to answer for
doing so alone. These men desire by your means to injure their enemy, and wish to make you the minister
of their wickedness, in order that through your help they may sow the seeds  of their accursed heresy in the
Church. Now it is not a prudent thing to cast one's self into manifest danger for the pleasure of others.
Cease then, I beseech you, O Constantius, and be persuaded by me. These things it becomes me to write,
and you not to despise.'

45. Lapse of Hosius, due to cruel persecution.

   Such were the sentiments, and such the letter, of the Abraham-like old man, Hosius, truly so called[6].
But the Emperor desisted not from his designs, nor ceased to seek an occasion against him; but continued
to threaten him severely, with a view either to bring him over by force, or to banish him if he refused to
comply. And as the Officers and Satraps of Babylon[7], seeking an occasion against Daniel, found none
except in the law of his God; so likewise these present Satraps of impiety were unable to invent any charge
against the old man (for this true Hosius, and his blameless life were known to all), except the charge of
hatred to their heresy. They therefore proceeded to accuse him; though not under the same circumstances
as those others accused Daniel to Darius, for Darius was grieved to hear the charge, but as Jezebel accused
Naboth, and as the Jews applied themselves to Herod. And they said, 'He not only will not subscribe
against Athanasius, but also on his account condemns us; and his hatred to the heresy is so great, that he
also writes to others, that they should rather suffer death, than become traitors to the truth. For, he says, our
beloved Athanasius also is persecuted for the Truth's sake, and Liberius, Bishop of Rome, and all the rest,
are treacherously assailed.' When this patron of impiety, and Emperor of heresy[8], Constantius, heard this,
and especially that there were others also in the Spains of the same mind as Hosius, after he had tempted
them also to subscribe, and was unable to compel them to do so, he sent for Hosius, and instead of
banishing him, detained him a whole year in Sirmium. Godless, unholy, without natural affection, he
feared not God, he regarded not his father's affection for Hosius, he reverenced not his great age, for he
was now a hundred years old[9]; but all these things this modern Ahab, this second Belshazzar of our
times, disregarded for the sake of impiety. He used such violence towards the old man, and confined him
so straitly, that at last, broken by suffering, he was brought, though hardly, to hold communion with
Valens, Ursacius, and their fellows, though he would not subscribe against Athanasius. Yet even thus he
forgot not his duty, for at the approach of death, as it were by his last testament, he bore witness to the
force which had been used towards him, and anathematized the Arian heresy, and gave strict charge that no
one should receive it.

46. Arbitrary expulsion of so many bishops.

   Who that witnessed these things, or that has merely heard of them, will not be greatly amazed, and cry
aloud unto the Lord, saying, 'Wilt Thou make a full end of Israel[10]?' Who that is acquainted with these
proceedings, will not with good reason cry out and say, 'A wonderful and horrible thing is done in the
land;' and, 'The heavens are astonished at this, and the earth is even more horribly afraid[11].' The fathers
of the people and the teachers of the faith are taken away, and the impious are brought into the Churches?
Who that saw when Liberius, Bishop of Rome, was banished, and when the great Hosius, the father" of the
Bishops, suffered these things, or who that saw so many Bishops banished out of Spain and the other parts,
could fail to perceive, however little sense he might possess, that the charges[13] against Athanasius also
and the rest were false, and altogether mere calumny? For this reason those others also endured all
suffering, because they saw plainly that the conspiracies laid against these were founded in falsehood. For
what charge was there against Liberius? or what accusation against the aged Hosius? who bore even a false
witness against Paulinus, and Lucifer, and Dionysius, and Eusebius? or what sin could be lain to the
account of the rest of the banished Bishops, and Presbyters, and Deacons? None whatever; God forbid.
There were no charges against them on which a plot for their ruin might be formed; nor was it on the
ground of any accusation that they were severally banished. It was an insurrection of impiety against
godliness; it was zeal for the Arian heresy, and a prelude to the coming of Antichrist, for whom
Constantius is thus preparing the way.


PART VII: PERSECUTION AT ALEXANDRIA.

   47. AFTER he had accomplished all that he desired against the Churches in Italy, and the other parts;
after he had banished some, and violently oppressed others, and filled every place with fear, he at last
turned his fury, as it had been some pestilential disorder, against Alexandria. This was artfully contrived by
the enemies of Christ; for in order that they might have a show of the signatures of many Bishops, and that
Athanasius might not have a single Bishop in his persecution to whom he could even complain, they
therefore anticipated his proceedings, and filled every place with terror, which they kept up to second them
in the prosecution of their designs. But herein they perceived not through their folly that they were not
exhibiting the deliberate choice of the Bishops, but rather the violence which themselves had employed;
and that, although his brethren should desert him, and his friends and acquaintance stand afar off, and no
one be found to sympathise with him and console him, yet far above all these, a refuge with his God was
sufficient for him. For Elijah also was alone in his persecution, and God was all in all to the holy man. And
the Saviour has given us an example herein, who also was left alone, and exposed to the designs of His
enemies, to teach us, that when we are persecuted and deserted by men, we must not faint, but place our
hope in Him, and not betray the Truth. For although at first truth may seem to be afflicted, yet even they
who persecute shall afterwards acknowledge it.

48. Attacks upon the Alexandrian Church.

   Accordingly they urge on the Emperor, who first writes a menacing letter, which he sends to the Duke
and the soldiers. The Notaries Diogenius and Hilarius[3], and certain Palatines with them, were the bearers
of it; upon whose arrival those terrible and cruel outrages were committed against the Church, which I have
briefly related a little above[3], and which are known to all men from the protests put forth by the people,
which are inserted at the end of this history, so that any one may read them. Then after these proceedings
on the part of Syrianus, after these enormities had been perpetrated, and violence offered to the Virgins, as
approving of such conduct and the infliction of these evils upon us, he writes again to the senate and people
of Alexandria, instigating the younger men, and requiring them to assemble together, and either to
persecute Athanasius, or consider themselves as his enemies. He however had withdrawn before these
instructions reached them, and from the time when Syrianus broke into the Church; for he remembered that
which was written, 'Hide thyself as it were for a little moment, until the indignation be overpast[4].' One
Heraclius, by rank a Count, was the hearer of this letter, and the precursor of a certain George that was
despatched by the Emperor as a spy, for one that was sent from him cannot be a Bishops; God forbid. And
so indeed his conduct and the circumstances which preceded his entrance sufficiently prove.

49 and 50. Hypocrisy of the pretended respect of Constantius for his brother's memory.

   Heraclius then published the letter, which reflected great disgrace upon the writer. For whereas, when
the great Hosius wrote to Constantius, he had been unable to make out any plausible pretext for his change
of conduct, he now invented an excuse much more discreditable to himself and his advisers. He said, 'From
regard to the affection I entertained towards my brother of divine and pious memory, I endured for a time
the coming of Athanasius among you.' This proves that he has both broken his promise, and behaved
ungratefully to his brother after his death. He then declares him to be, as indeed he is, 'deserving of divine
and pious remembrance;' yet as regards a command of his, or to use his own language, the 'affection' he
bore him, even though he complied merely' for the sake' of the blessed Constans, he ought to deal fairly by
his brother, and make himself heir to his sentiments as well as to the Empire. But, although, when seeking
to obtain his just rights, he deposed Vetranio, with the question, 'To whom does the inheritance belong
after a brother's death[6]?' yet for the sake of the accursed heresy of the enemies of Christ, he disregards
the claims of justice, and behaves undutifully towards his brethren. Nay, for the sake of this heresy, he
would not consent to observe even his father's wishes without infringement; but, in what he may gratify
these impious men, he pretends to adopt his intention, while in order to distress the others, he cares not to
shew the reverence which is due unto a father. For in consequence of the calumnies of Eusebius and his
fellows, his father sent the Bishop for a time into Gaul to avoid the cruelty of his persecutors (this was
shewn by the blessed  Constantine, the brother of the former, after their father's death, as appears by his
letters[7]), but he would not be persuaded by Eusebius and his fellows to send the person whom they
desired for a Bishop, but prevented the accomplishment of their wishes, and put a stop to their attempts
with severe threats.

51. How Constantius shews his respect for his father and brother.

   If therefore, as he declares in his letters, he desired to observe his sire's practice, why did he first send
out Gregory, and now this George, the eater of stores[8]? Why does he endeavour so earnestly to introduce
into the Church these Arians, whom his father named Porphyrians[9], and banish others while he patronises
them? Although his father admitted Arius to his presence, yet when Arius perjured himself and burst
asunder[10] he lost the compassion of his father; who, on learning the truth, condemned him as an heretic.
Why moreover, while pretending to respect the Canon of the Church, has he ordered the whole course of
his conduct in opposition to them? For where is there a Canon that a Bishop should be appointed from
Court? Where is there a Canon[1] that permits soldiers to invade Churches? What tradition is there
allowing counts and ignorant eunuchs to exercise authority in Ecclesiastical matters, and to make known
by their edicts the decisions of those who bear the name of Bishops? He is guilty of all manner of
falsehood for the sake of this unholy heresy. At a former time he sent out Philagrius as Prefect a second
time[2], in opposition to the opinion of his father, and we see what has taken place now. Nor 'for his
brother's sake' does he speak the truth. For after his death he wrote not once nor twice, but three times to
the Bishop, and repeatedly promised him that he would not change his behaviour towards him, but
exhorted him to be of good courage, and not suffer any one to alarm him, but to continue to abide in his
Church in perfect security. He also sent his commands by Count Asterius, and Palladius the Notary, to
Felicissimus, who was then Duke, and to the Prefect Nestorius, that if either Philip the Prefect, or any other
should venture to form any plot against Athanasius, they should prevent it.

52. The Emperor has no right to rule the Church.

   Wherefore when Diogenes came, and Syrianus laid in wait for us, both he and we[2a] and the people
demanded to see the Emperor's letters, supposing that, as it is written, 'Let not a falsehood be spoken before
the king[3];' so when a king has made a promise, he will not lie, nor change. If then 'for his brother's sake
he complied,' why did he also write those letters upon his death? And if he wrote them for 'his memory's
sake,' why did he afterwards behave so very unkindly towards him, and persecute the man, and write what
he did, alleging a judgment of Bishops, while in truth he acted only to please himself? Nevertheless his
craft has not escaped detection, but we have the proof of it ready at hand. For if a judgment had been
passed by Bishops, what concern had the Emperor with it? Or if it was only a threat of the Emperor, what
need in that case was there of the so-named Bishops? When was such a thing heard of before from the
beginning of the world? When did a judgment of the Church receive its validity from the Emperor? or
rather when was his decree ever recognised by the Church? There have been many Councils held
heretofore; and many judgments passed by the Church; but the Fathers never sought the consent of the
Emperor thereto, nor did the Emperor busy himself with the affairs of the Church[3a]. The Apostle Paul
had friends among them of Caesar's household, and in his Epistle to the Philippians he sent salutations
from them; but he never took them as his associates in Ecclesiastical judgments. Now however we have
witnessed a novel spectacle, which is a discovery of the Arian heresy. Heretics have assembled together
with the Emperor Constantius, in order that he, alleging the authority of the Bishops, may exercise his
power against whomsoever he pleases, and while he persecutes may avoid the name of persecutor; and that
they, supported by the Emperor's government, may conspire the ruin of whomsoever they will[4] and these
are all such as are not as impious as themselves. One might look upon their proceedings as a comedy which
they are performing on the stage, in which the pretended Bishops are actors, and Constantius the performer
of their behests, who makes promises to them, as Herod did to the daughter of Herodias, and they dancing
before him accomplish through false accusations the banishment and death of the true believers in the
Lord.

53. Despotic interference of Constantius.

   Who indeed has not been injured by their calumnies? Whom have not these enemies of Christ conspired
to destroy? Whom has Constantius failed to banish upon charges which they have brought against them?
When did he refuse to hear them willingly? And what is most strange, when did he permit any ;one to
speak against them, and did not more readily receive their testimony, of whatever kind it might be? Where
is there a Church which now enjoys the privilege of worshipping Christ freely? If a Church be a maintainer
of true piety, it is in danger; if it dissemble, it abides in fear. Every place is full of hypocrisy and impiety,
so far as he is concerned; and wherever there is a pious person and a lover of Christ (and there are many
such everywhere, as were the prophets and the great Elijah) they hide themselves, if so be that they can
find a faithful friend like Obadiah, and either they withdraw into caves and dens of the earth, or pass their
lives in wandering about in the deserts. These men in their madness prefer such calumnies against them as
Jezebel invented against Naboth, and the Jews against the Saviour; while the Emperor, who is the patron of
the heresy, and wishes to pervert the truth, as Ahab wished to change the vineyard into a garden of herbs,
does whatever they desire him to do, for the suggestions he receives from them are agreeable to his own
wishes.

54. Constantius gives up the Alexandrian Churches to the heretics.

   Accordingly he banished, as I said before the genuine Bishops, because they would not profess impious
doctrines, to suit his own pleasure; and so he now sent Count Heraclius to proceed against Athanasius, who
has publicly made known his decrees, and announced the command of the Emperor to be, that unless they
complied with the instructions contained in his letters, their breads should be taken away, their idols
overthrown, and the persons of many of the city-magistrates and people delivered over to certain slavery.
After threatening them in this manner, he was not ashamed to declare publicly with a loud voice, 'The
Emperor disclaims Athanasius, and has commanded that the Churches be given up to the Arians.' And
when all wondered to hear this, and made signs to one another, exclaiming, 'What I has Constantius
become a heretic?' instead of blushing as he ought, the man all the more obliged the senators and heathen
magistrates and wardens[6] of the idol temples to subscribe to these conditions, and to agree to receive as
their Bishop whomsoever[7] the Emperor should send them. Of course Constantius was strictly upholding
the Canon of the Church, when he caused this to be done when instead of requiring letters from the
Church, he demanded them of the market-place, and instead of the people he asked them of the wardens of
the temples. He was conscious that he was not sending a Bishop to preside over Christians, but a certain
intruder for those who subscribed to his terms.

55. Corruption into the great Church.

   The Gentiles accordingly, as purchasing by their compliance the safety of their idols, and certain of the
trades[8], subscribed, though unwillingly, from fear of the threats which he had held out to them; just as if
the matter had been the appointment of a general, or other magistrate. Indeed what as heathen, were they
likely to do, except whatever was pleasing to the Emperor? But the people having assembled in the great
Church (for it was the fourth day of the week), Count Heraclius on the following day[9] takes with him
Cataphronius the Prefect of Egypt, and Faustinus the Receiver-General[10], and Bithynus a heretic; and
together they stir up the younger men of the common multitude[11] who worshipped idols, to attack the
Church, and stone the people, saying that such was the Emperor's command. As the time of dismissal
however had arrived, the greater part had already left the Church, but there being a few women still
remaining, they did as the men had charged them, whereupon a piteous spectacle ensued. The few women
had just risen from prayer and had sat down when the youths suddenly came upon them naked with stones
and clubs. Some of them the godless wretches stoned to death; they scourged with stripes the holy persons
of the Virgins, tore off their veils and exposed their heads, and when they resisted the insult, the cowards
kicked them with their feet. This was dreadful, exceedingly dreadful; but what ensued was worse, and more
intolerable than any outrage. Knowing the holy character of the virgins, and that their ears were
unaccustomed to pollution, and that they were better able to bear stones and swords than expressions of
obscenity, they assailed them with such language. This the Arians suggested to the young men, and
laughed at all they said and did; while the holy Virgins and other godly women fled from such words as
they would from the bite of asps, but the enemies of Christ assisted them in the work, nay even, it may be,
gave utterance to the same; for they were well- pleased with the obscenities which the youths vented upon
them.

56. The great Church pillaged.

   After this, that they might fully execute the orders they had received (for this was what they earnestly
desired, and what the Count and the Receiver-General instructed them to do), they seized upon the seats,
the throne, and the table which was of wood[1], and the curtains[2] of the Church, and whatever else they
were able, and carrying them out burnt them before the doors in the great street, and cast frankincense upon
the flame. Alas! who will not weep to hear of these things, and, it may be, close his ears, that he may not
have to endure the recital, esteeming it hurtful merely to listen to the account of such enormities? Moreover
they sang the praises of their idols, and said, 'Constantius hath become a heathen, and the Arians have
acknowledged our customs;' for indeed they scruple not even to pretend heathenism, if only their heresy
may be established. They even were ready to sacrifice a heifer which drew the water for the gardens in the
Caesareum[3]; and would have sacrificed it, had it not been a female[4]; for they said that it was unlawful
for such to be offered among them.

   57. Thus acted the impious[5] Arians in conjunction with the heathens, thinking that these things tended
to our dishonour. But Divine justice reproved their iniquity, and wrought a great and remarkable sign,
thereby plainly shewing to all men, that as in their acts of impiety they had dared to attack none other but
the Lord, so in these proceedings also they were again attempting to do dishonour unto Him. This was
more manifestly proved by the marvellous event which now came to pass. One of these licentious youths
ran into the Church, and ventured to sit down upon the throne; and as he sat there the wretched man uttered
with a nasal sound some lascivious song. Then rising up he attempted to pull away the throne, and to drag
it towards him; he knew not that he was drawing down vengeance upon himself. For as of old the
inhabitants of Azotus, when they ventured to touch[6] the Ark, which it was not lawful for them even to
look upon, were immediately destroyed by it, being first grievously tormented by emerods; so this unhappy
person who presumed to drag the throne, drew it upon himself, and, as if Divine justice had sent the wood
to punish him, he struck it into his own bowels; and instead of carrying out the throne, he brought out by
his blow his own entrails; so that the throne took away his life, instead of his taking it away. For, as it is[7]
written of Judas, his bowels gushed out; and he fell down and was carried away, and the day after he died.
Another also entered the Church with boughs of trees[7a] and, as in the Gentile manner he waved them in
his hands and mocked, he was immediately struck with blindness, so as straightway to lose his sight, and to
know no longer where he was; but as he was about to fall, he was taken by the hand and supported by his
companions out of the place, and when on the following day he was with difficulty brought to his senses,
he knew not either what he had done or suffered in consequence of his audacity.

58. General Persecution at Alexandria.

   The Gentiles, when they beheld these things, were seized with fear, and ventured on no further outrage;
but the Arians were not even yet touched with shame, but, like the Jews when they saw the miracles, were
faithless and would not believe, nay, like Pharaoh, they were hardened; they too having placed their hopes
below, on the Emperor and his eunuchs. They permitted the Gentiles, or rather the more abandoned of the
Gentiles, to act in the manner before described; for they found that Faustinus, who is the Receiver-General
by style, but is a vulgar[8] person in habits, and profligate in heart, was ready to play his part with them in
these proceedings, and to stir up the heathen. Nay they undertook to do the like themselves, that as they
had modelled their heresy upon all other heresies together[9], so they might share their wickedness with the
more depraved of mankind. What they did through the instrumentality of others I described above; the
enormities they committed themselves surpass the bounds of all wickedness; and they exceed the malice of
any hangman. Where is there a house which they did not ravage? where is there a family they did not
plunder on pretence of searching for their opponents? where is there a garden they did not trample under
foot? what tomb[10] did they not open, pretending they were seeking for Athanasius, though their sole
object was to plunder and spoil all that came in their way? How many men's houses were sealed up[1]! The
contents of how many persons' lodgings did they give away to the soldiers who assisted them! Who had not
experience of their wickedness? Who that met them but was obliged to hide himself in the market-place?
Did not many an one leave his house from fear of them, and pass the night in the desert? Did not many an
one, while anxious to preserve his property from them, lose the greater part of it? And who, however
inexperienced of the sea, did not choose rather to commit himself to it, and to risk all its dangers, than to
witness their threatenings? Many also changed their residences, and removed from street to street, and from
the city to the suburbs. And many submitted to severe fines, and when they were unable to pay, borrowed
of others, merely that they might escape their machinations.

59. Violence of Sebastianus.

   For they made themselves formidable to all men, and treated all with great arrogance, using the name of
the Emperor, and threatening them with his displeasure. They had to assist them in their wickedness the
Duke Sebastianus, a Manichee, and a profligate young man; the[2] Prefect, the Count, and the Receiver-
General as a dissembler. Many Virgins who condemned their impiety, and professed the truth, they brought
out from the houses; others they insulted as they walked along the streets, and caused their heads to be
uncovered by their young men. They also gave permission to the females of their party to insult whom they
chose; and although the holy and faithful women withdrew on one side, and gave them the way, yet they
gathered round them like Bacchanals and Furies[3], and esteemed it a misfortune if they found no means to
injure them, and spent that day sorrowfully on which they were unable to do them some mischief. In a
word, so cruel and bitter were they against all, that all men called them hangmen, murderers, lawless,
intruders, evil-doers, and by any other name rather than that of Christians.

60. Martyrdom of Eutychius.

   Moreover, imitating the savage practices of Scythians, they seized upon Eutychius a Sub-deacon, a man
who had served the Church honourably, and causing him to be scourged on the back with a leather whip,
till he was at the point of death, they demanded that her should be sent away to the mines; and not simply
to any mine, but to that of Phaeno[4], where even a condemned murderer is hardly able to live a few days.
And what was most unreasonable in their conduct, they would not permit him even a few hours to have his
wounds dressed, but caused him to be sent off immediately, saying, 'If this is done, all men will be afraid,
and henceforward will be on our side.' After a short interval, however, being unable to accomplish his
journey to the mine on account of the pain of his stripes, he died on the way. He perished rejoicing, having
obtained the glory of martyrdom. But the miscreants were not even yet ashamed, but in the words of
Scripture, 'having bowels without mercy[5],' they acted accordingly, and now again perpetrated a satanic
deed. When the people prayed them to spare Eutychius and besought them for him, they caused four
honourable and free citizens to be seized, one of whom was Hermias who washed the beggars' feet[6]; and
after scourging them very severely, the Duke cast them into the prison. But the Arians, who are more cruel
even than Scythians, when they had seen that they did not die from the stripes they had received,
complained of the Duke and threatened, saying, 'We will write and tell the eunuchs[7], that he does not
flog as we wish.' Hearing this he was afraid, and was obliged to beat the men a second time; and they being
beaten, and knowing for what cause they suffered and by whom they had been accused, said only, 'We are
beaten for the sake of the Truth, but we will not hold communion with the heretics: beat us now as thou
wilt; God will judge thee for this.' The impious men wished to expose them to danger in the prison, that
they might die there; but the people of God observing their time, besought him for them, and after seven
days or more they were set at liberty.

61. Ill-treatment of the Poor.

   But the Arians, as being grieved at this, again devised another yet more cruel and unholy deed; cruel in
the eyes of all men, but well suited to their antichristian heresy. The Lord commanded that we should
remember the poor; He said, 'Sell that ye have, and give alms" and again 'I was a hundred and ye gave Me
meat; I was thirsty, and ye gave Me drink; for inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of these little ones, ye
have done it unto Me[8].' But these men, as being in truth opposed to Christ, have presumed to act contrary
to His will in this respect also. For when the Duke gave up the Churches to the Arians, and the destitute
persons and widows were unable to continue any longer in them, the widows sat down in places which the
Clergy entrusted with the care of them appointed. And when the Arians saw that the brethren readily
ministered unto them and supported them, they persecuted the widows also, beating them on the feet, and
accused those who gave to them before the Duke. This was done by means of a certain soldier named
Dynamius. And it was well-pleasing to Sebastian[9], for there is no mercy in the Manichaeans; nay, it is
considered a hateful thing among them to shew mercy to a poor man[9a]. Here then was a novel subject of
complaint; and a new kind of court now first invented by the Arians. Persons were brought to trial for acts
of kindness which they had performed; he who shewed mercy was accused, and he who had received a
benefit was beaten; and they wished rather that a poor man should suffer hunger, than that he who was
willing to shew mercy should give to him. Such sentiments these modern Jews, for such they are, have
learned from the Jews of old, who when they saw him who had been blind from his birth recover his sight,
and him who had been a long time sick of the palsy made whole, accused[1] the Lord who had bestowed
these benefits upon them, and judged them to be transgressors who had experienced His goodness[2].

62. Ill-treatment of the poor.

   Who was not struck with astonishment at these proceedings? Who did not execrate both the heresy, and
its defenders? Who failed to perceive that the Arians are indeed more cruel than wild beasts? For they had
no prospect of gain[3] from their iniquity, for the sake of which they might have acted in this manner; but
they rather increased the hatred of all men against themselves. They thought by treachery and terror to
force certain persons into their heresy, so that they might be brought to communicate with them; but the
event turned out quite the contrary. The sufferers endured as martyrdom whatever they inflicted upon
them, and neither betrayed nor denied the true faith in Christ. And those who were without and witnessed
their conduct, and at last even the heathen, when they saw these things, execrated them as antichristian, as
cruel executioners; for human nature is prone to pity and sympathise with the poor. But these men have lost
even the common sentiments of humanity; and that kindness which they would have desired to meet with
at the hands of others, had themselves been sufferers, they would not permit others to receive, but
employed against them the severity and authority of the magistrates, and especially of the Duke.

63. Ill-treatment of the Presbyters and Deacons.

   What they have done to the Presbyters and Deacons; how they drove them into banishment under
sentence passed upon them by the Duke and the magistrates, causing the soldiers to bring out their kinsfolk
from the houses[4], and Gorgonius, the commander of the polices to beat them with stripes; and how (most
cruel act of all) with much insolence they plundered the loaves[6] of these and of those who were now
dead; these things it is impossible for words to describe, for their cruelty surpasses all the powers of
language. What terms could one employ which might seem equal to the subject? What circumstances could
one mention first, so that those next recorded would not be found more dreadful, and the next more
dreadful still? All their attempts and iniquities[7] were full of murder and impiety; and so unscrupulous and
artful are they, that they endeavour to deceive by promises of protection, and by bribing with money[8],
that so, since they cannot recommend themselves by fair means, they may thereby make some display to
impose on the simple.


PART VIII: PERSECUTION IN EGYPT.

   64. Who would call them even by the name of Gentiles; much less by that of Christians? Would any one
regard their habits and feelings as human, and not rather those of wild beasts, seeing their cruel and savage
conduct? They are more worthless than public hangmen; more audacious than all other heretics. To the
Gentiles they are much inferior, and stand far apart and separate from them[1]. I have heard from our
fathers, and I believe their report to be a faithful one, that long ago, when a persecution arose in the time[2]
of Maximian, the grandfather of Constantius, the Gentiles concealed our brethren the Christians, who were
sought after, and frequently suffered the loss of their own substance, and had trial of imprisonment, solely
that they might not betray the fugitives. They protected those who fled to them for refuge, as they would
have done their own persons, and were determined to run all risks on their behalf. But now these admirable
persons, the inventors of a new heresy, act altogether the contrary part; and are distinguished for nothing
but their treachery. They have appointed themselves as executioners, and seek to betray all alike, and make
those who conceal others the objects of their plots, esteeming equally as their enemy both him that conceals
and him that is concealed. So murderous are they; so emulous in their evil- doings of the wickedness of
Judas.

65. Martyrdom of Secundus of Barka.

   The crimes these men have committed cannot adequately be described. I would only say, that as I write
and wish to enumerate all their deeds of iniquity, the thought enters my mind, whether this heresy be not
the fourth daughter of the horse-leach[3] in the Proverbs, since after so many acts of injustice, so many
murders, it hath not yet said, 'It is enough.' No; it still rages, and goes about[4] seeking after those whom it
has not yet discovered, while those whom it has already injured, it is eager to injure anew. After the night
attack, after the evils committed in consequence of it, after the persecution brought about by Heraclius,
they cease not yet to accuse us falsely before the Emperor (and they are confident that as impious persons
they will obtain a hearing), desiring that something more than banishment may be inflicted upon us, and
that hereafter those who do not consent to their impieties may be destroyed. Accordingly, being now
emboldened in an extreme degree, that most abandoned Secundus[5] of Pentapolis, and Stephanus[6] his
accomplice, conscious that their heresy was a defence of any injustice they might commit, on discovering a
Presbyter at Barka who would not comply with their desires (he was called Secundus, being of the same
name, but not of the same faith with the heretic), they kicked him till he died[7]. While he was thus
suffering he imitated the Saint, and; said, "Let no one avenge my cause before human judges; I have the
Lord for my avenger, for whose sake I suffer these things at their hands.' They however were not moved
with pity at these words, nor did they feel any awe of the sacred season; for it was during the time of
Lent[8] that they thus kicked the man to death.

66. Persecution the weapon of Arianism.

   O new heresy, that hast put on the whole devil in impiety and wicked deeds! For in truth it is but a lately
invented evil; and although certain heretofore appear to have adopted its doctrines, yet they concealed
them, and were not known to hold them. But Eusebius and Arius, like serpents coming out of their holes,
have vomited forth the poison of this impiety; Arius daring to blaspheme openly, and[9] Eusebius
defending his blasphemy. He was not however able to support the heresy, until, as I said before, he found a
patron[1] for it in the Emperor. Our fathers called an Ecumenical Council, when three hundred of them,
more or less[2], met together and condemned the Arian heresy, and all declared that it was alien and
strange to the faith of the Church. Upon this its supporters, perceiving that they were dishonoured, and had
now no good ground of argument to insist upon, devised a different method, and attempted to vindicate it
by means of external power. And herein one may especially admire the novelty as well as wickedness of
their device, and how they go beyond all other heresies. For these support their madness by persuasive
arguments calculated to deceive the simple; the Greeks, as the Apostle has said, make their attack with
excellency and persuasiveness of speech, and with plausible fallacies; the Jews, leaving the divine
Scriptures, now, as the Apostle again has said, contend about 'fables and endless genealogies[3];' and the
Manichees and Valentinians with them, and others, corrupting the divine Scriptures, put forth fables in
terms of their own inventions. But the Arians are bolder than them all, and have shewn that the other
heresies are but their younger sisters[4], whom, as I have said, they surpass in impiety, emulating them all,
and especially the Jews in their iniquity. For as the Jews, when they were unable to prove the charges
which they pretended to allege against Paul, straightway led him to the chief captain and the governor; so
likewise these men, who surpass the Jews in their devices, make use only of the power of the judges; and if
any one so much as speaks against them, he is dragged before the Governor or the General.

67. Arianism worse than other heresies, because of Persecution.

   The other heresies also, when the very Truth has refuted them on the clearest evidence, are wont to be
silent, being simply confounded by their conviction. But this modern and accursed heresy, when it is
overthrown by argument, when it is cast down and covered with shame by the very Truth, forthwith
endeavours to coerce by violence and stripes and imprisonment those whom it has been unable to persuade
by argument, thereby acknowledging itself to be anything rather than godly. For it is the part of true
godliness not to compel[5], but to persuade, as I said before. Thus our Lord Himself, not as employing
force, but as offering to their free choice, has said to all, 'If any man will follow after Me[6];' and to His
disciples, 'Will ye also go away[7]?' This heresy, however, is altogether alien from godliness; and therefore
how otherwise should it act, than contrary to our Saviour, seeing also that it has enlisted that enemy of
Christ, Constantius, as it were Antichrist himself[8], to be its leader in impiety? He for its sake has
earnestly endeavoured to emulate Saul in savage cruelty. For when the priests gave victuals to David, Saul
commanded, and they were all destroyed, in number three hundred and five[9]; and this man, now that all
avoid the heresy, and confess a sound faith in the Lord, annuls a Council of full three hundred Bishops,
banishes the Bishops themselves, and hinders the people from the practice of piety, and from their prayers
to God, preventing their public assemblies. And as Saul overthrew Nob, the city of the priests, so this man,
advancing even further in wickedness, has given up the Churches to the impious. And as he honoured
Doeg the accuser before the true priests, and persecuted David, giving ear to the Ziphires; so this man
prefers heretics to the godly, and still persecutes them that flee from him, giving ear to his own eunuchs,
who falsely accuse the orthodox: He does not perceive that whatever he does or writes in behalf of the
heresy of the Arians, involves an attack[1] upon the Saviour.

68. Constantius worse than Saul, Ahab, and Pilate. His past conduct to his own relations.

   Ahab himself did not act so cruelly towards the priests of God, as this man has acted towards the
Bishops. For he was at least pricked in his conscience, when Naboth had been murdered, and was afraid at
the sight[2] of Elijah, but this man neither reverenced the great Hosius, nor was wearied or pricked in
conscience, after banishing so many Bishops; but like another Pharaoh, the more he is afflicted, the more
he is hardened, and imagines greater wickedness day by day. And the most extraordinary instance of his
iniquity was the following. It happened that when the Bishops were condemned to banishment, certain
other persons also received their sentence on charges of murder or sedition or theft, each according to the
quality of his offence. These men after a few months he released, on being requested to do so, as Pilate did
Barabbas; but the servants of Christ he not only refused to set at liberty, but even sentenced them to more
unmerciful punishment in the place of their exile, proving himself 'an undying evil[2a]' to them. To the
others through congeniality of disposition he became a friend; but to the orthodox he was an enemy on
account of their true faith in Christ. Is it not clear to all men from hence, that the Jews of old when they
demanded Barabbas, and crucified the Lord, acted but the part which these present enemies of Christ are
acting together with Constantius? nay, that he is even more bitter than Pilate. For Pilate, when he
perceived[3] the injustice of the deed, washed his hands; but this man, while he banishes the saints, gnashes
his teeth against them more and more.

   69. But what wonder is it if, after he has been led into impious errors, he is so cruel towards the Bishops,
since the common feelings of humanity could not induce him to spare even his own kindred. His uncles[4]
he slew; his cousins he put out of the way; he commiserated not the sufferings of his father-in-law, though
he had married his daughter, or of his kinsmen; but he has ever been a transgressor of his oaths towards all.
So likewise he treated his brother in an unholy manner; and now he pretends to build his sepulchre,
although he delivered up to the barbarians his betrothed wife Olympias, whom his brother had protected till
his death, and had brought up as his intended consort. Moreover he attempted to set aside his wishes,
although he boasts to be his heirs; for so he writes, in terms which any one possessed of but a small
measure of sense would be ashamed of. But when I compare his letters, I find that he does not possess
common understanding, but that his mind is solely regulated by the suggestions of others, and that he has
no mind of his own at all. Now Solomon says, 'If a ruler hearken to lies, all his servants are wicked[6].'
This man proves by his actions that he is such an unjust one, and that those about him are wicked.

70. Inconstancy of Constantius.

   How then, being such an one, and taking pleasure in such associates, can he ever design anything just or
reasonable, entangled as he is in the iniquity of his followers, men who verily bewitch him, or rather who
have trampled his brains under their heels? Wherefore he now writes letters[6a], and then repents that he
has written them, and after repenting is again stirred up to anger, and then again laments his fate, and being
undetermined what to do, he shows a soul destitute of understanding. Being then of such a character, one
must fairly pity him, because that under the semblance and name of freedom he is the slave of those who
drag him on to gratify their own impious pressure. In a word, while through his folly and inconstancy, as
the Scripture saith[7], he is willing to comply with the desires of others, he has given himself up to
condemnation, to be consumed by fire in the future judgment; at once consenting to do whatever they wish,
and gratifying them in their designs against the Bishops, and in their exertion of authority over the
Churches. For behold, he has now again thrown into disorder all the Churches of Alexandria[8] and of
Egypt and Libya, and has publicly given orders, that the Bishops of the Catholic Church and faith be cast
out of their churches, and that they be all given up to the professors of the Arian doctrines[9]. The General
began to carry this order into execution; and straightway Bishops were sent off in chains, and Presbyters
and Monks bound with iron, after being almost beaten to death with stripes. Disorder prevails in every
place; all Egypt and Libya are in danger, the people being indignant at this unjust command, and seeing in
it the preparation for the coming of Antichrist, and beholding their property plundered by others, and given
up into the hands of the heretics.

71. This wickedness unprecedented.

   When was ever such iniquity heard of? when was such an evil deed ever perpetrated, even in times of
persecution? They were heathens who persecuted formerly; but they did not bring their idols into the
Churches. Zenobia[9a], was a Jewess, and a supporter of Paul of Samosata; but she did not give up the
Churches to the Jews for Synagogues. This is a new piece of iniquity. It is not simply persecution, but more
than persecution, it is a prelude and preparation[10] for the coming of Antichrist. Even if it be admitted that
they invented false charges against Athanasius and the rest of the Bishops whom they banished, yet what is
this to their later practices? What charges have they to allege against the whole of Egypt and Libya and
Pentapolis[1]? For they have begun no longer to lay their plots against individuals, in which case they
might be able to frame a lie against them; but they have set upon all in a body, so that if they merely
choose to invent accusations against them, they must be condemned. Thus their wickedness has blinded
their understanding[2]; and they have required, without any reason assigned, that the whole body of the
Bishops shall be expelled, and thereby they shew that the charges they framed against Athanasius and the
rest of the Bishops whom they banished were false, and invented for no other purpose than to support the
accursed heresy of the Arian enemies of Christ. This is now no longer concealed, but has become most
manifest to all men. He commanded Athanasius to be expelled out of the city, and gave up the Churches to
them. And the Presbyters and Deacons that were with him, who had been appointed by Peter and
Alexander, were also expelled and driven into banishment; and the real Arians, who not through any
suspicions arising from circumstances, but on account of the heresy had been expelled at first together with
Arius himself by the Bishop Alexander,--Secundus in Libya, in Alexandria Euzoius[3] the Chananaean,
Julius, Ammon, Marcus, Irenaeus, Zosimus, and Sarapion surnamed Pelycon, and in Libya Sisinnius, and
the younger men with him, associates in his impiety; these have obtained possession of the Churches.

72. Banishment of Egyptian Bishops.

   And the General Sebastian wrote to the governors and military authorities in every place; and the true
Bishops were persecuted, and those who professed impious doctrines were brought in in their stead. They
banished Bishops who had grown old in orders, and had been many years in the Episcopate, having been
ordained by the Bishop Alexander; Ammonius[4], Hermes, Anagamphus, and Marcus, they sent to the
Upper Oasis; Muis, Psenosiris, Nilammon, Henes, Marcus, and Athenodorus to Ammoniaca, with no other
intention than that they should perish in their passage through the deserts. They had no pity on them though
they were suffering from illness, and indeed proceeded on their journey with so much difficulty on account
of their weakness, that they were obliged to be carried in litters, and their sickness was so dangerous that
the materials for their burial accompanied them. One of them indeed died, but they would not even permit
the body to be given up to his friends for interment. With the same purpose they banished also the Bishop
Dracontius to the desert places about Clysma, Philo to Babylon, Adelphius to Psinubia in the Thebais, and
the Presbyters Hierax and Dioscorus to Syene. They likewise drove into exile Ammonius, Agathus,
Agathodaemon, Apollonius, Eulogius, Apollos, Paphnutius, Gaius, and Flavius, ancient Bishops, as also
the Bishops Dioscorus, Ammonius, Heraclides, and Psais; some of whom they gave up to work in the
stone-quarries, others they persecuted with an intention to destroy, and many others they plundered. They
banished also forty of the laity, with certain virgins whom they had before exposed to the fires; beating
them so severely with rods taken from palm-trees, that after lingering five days some of them died, and
others had recourse to surgical treatment on account of the thorns left in their limbs, from which they
suffered torments worse than death[6]. But what is most dreadful to the mind of any man of sound
understanding, though  characteristic of these miscreants, is this: When the virgins during the scourging
called upon the Name of Christ, they gnashed their teeth against them with increased fury. Nay more, they
would not give up the bodies of the dead to their friends for burial, but concealed them that they might
appear to be ignorant of the murder. They did not however escape detection; the whole city perceived it,
and all men withdrew from them as executioners, as malefactors and robbers. Moreover they overthrew
monasteries, and endeavoured to cast monks into the fire; they plundered houses, and breaking into the
house of certain free citizens where the Bishop had deposited a treasure, they plundered and took it away.
They scourged the widows on the soles of their feet, and hindered them from receiving their alms.

73. Character of Arian nominees.

   Such were the iniquities practised by the Arians; and as to their further deeds of impiety, who could hear
the account of them without shuddering? They had caused these venerable old men and aged Bishops to be
sent into banishment; they now appointed in their stead profligate heathen youths, whom they thought to
raise at once to the highest dignity, though they were not even Catechumens[7]. And others who were
accused of bigamy[8], and even of worse crimes, they nominated Bishops on account of the wealth and
civil power which they possessed, and sent them out as it were from a market, upon their giving them gold.
And now more dreadful calamities befell the people. For when they rejected these mercenary dependents
of the Arians, so alien from themselves, they were scourged, they were proscribed, they were shut up in
prison by the General (who did all this readily, being a Manichee), in order that they might no longer seek
after their own Bishops, but be forced to accept those whom they abominated, men who were now guilty of
the same mockeries as they had before practised among their idols.

74. The Episcopal appointments of Constantius a mark of Antichrist.

   Will not every just person break forth into lamentations at the sight or hearing of these things, at
perceiving the arrogance and extreme injustice of these impious men? 'The righteous lament in the place of
the impious[9].' After all these things, and now that the impiety has reached such a pitch of audacity, who
will any longer venture to call this Costyllius[10] a Christian, and not rather the image of Antichrist? For
what mark of Antichrist is yet wanting? How can he in any way fail to be regarded as that one? or how can
the latter fail to be supposed such a one as he is? Did not the Arians and the Gentiles offer those sacrifices
in the great Church in the Caesareum[11], and utter their blasphemies against Christ as by His command?
And does not the vision of Daniel thus describe[1] Antichrist; that he shall make war with the saints, and
prevail against them, and exceed all that have been before him in evil deeds and shall humble thee kings,
and speak words against the Most High, and shall think to change times and laws? Now what other person
besides Constantius has ever attempted to do these things? He is surely such a one as Antichrist would be.
He speaks words against the Most High by supporting this impious heresy: he makes war against the saints
by banishing the Bishops; although indeed he exercises this power but for a little while[2] to his own
destruction. Moreover he has surpassed those before him in wickedness, having devised a new mode of
persecution; and after he had overthrown three kings, namely Vetranio, Magnentius, and Gallus, he
straightway undertook the patronage of impiety; and like a giant[3] he has dared in his pride to set himself
up against the Most High. He has thought to change laws, by transgressing the ordinance of the Lord given
us through His Apostles, by altering the customs of the Church, and inventing a new kind of appointments.
For he sends from strange places, distant a fifty days' journey[4], Bishops attended by soldiers to people
unwilling to receive them; and instead of an introduction to the acquaintance of their people, they bring
with them threatening messages and letters to the magistrates. Thins he sent Gregory from Cappadocia[5]
to Alexandria; he transferred Germinius from Cyzicus to Sirmium; he removed Cecropius from Laodicea
to Nicomedia.

75. Arrival of George at Alexandria, and proceedings of Constantius in Italy.

   Again he transferred from Cappadocia to Milan one Auxentius[6], an intruder rather than a Christian,
whom he commanded to stay there, after he had banished for his piety towards Christ Dionysius the Bishop
of the place, a godly man. But this person was as yet even ignorant of the Latin language, and unskilful in
everything except impiety. And now one George, a Cappadocian, who was contractor of stores[7] at
Constantinople, and having embezzled all monies that he received, was obliged to fly, he commanded to
enter Alexandria with military pomp, and supported by the authority of the General. Next, finding one
Epictetus[8] a novice, a bold young man, he loved him[9], perceiving that he was ready for wickedness;
and by his means he carries on his designs against those of the Bishops whom he desires to ruin. For he is
prepared to do everything that the Emperor wishes; who accordingly availing himself of his assistance, has
committed at Rome a strange act, but one truly resembling the malice of Antichrist. Having made
preparations in the Palace instead of the Church, and caused some three of his own eunuchs to attend
instead of the people, he then compelled three[1] ill-conditioned spies[2] (for one cannot call them
Bishops), to ordain forsooth as Bishop one Felix[3], a man worthy of them, then in the Palace. For the
people perceiving the iniquitous proceedings of the heretics would not allow them to enter the Churches[4],
and withdrew themselves far from them.

76. Tyrannous banishment of Bishops by Constantius.

   Now what is yet wanting to make him Antichrist? or what more could Antichrist do at his coming than
this man has done? Will he not find when he comes that the way has been already prepared for him by this
man easily to deceive the people? Again[5], he claims to himself the right of deciding causes, which he
refers to the Court instead of the Church, and presides at them in person. And strange it is to say, when he
perceives the accusers at a loss, he takes up the accusation himself, so that the injured party may no longer
be able to defend himself on account of the violence which he displays. This he did in the proceedings
against Athanasius. For when he saw the boldness of the Bishops Paulinus, Lucifer, Eusebius, and
Dionysius, and how out of the recantation of Ursacius and Valens[6] they confuted those who spoke
against the Bishop, and advised that Valens and his fellows should no longer be believed, since they had
already retracted what they now asserted, he immediately stood up[7] and said, 'I am now the accuser of
Athanasius; on my account you must believe what these assert.' And then, when they said,--'But how can
you be an accuser, when the accused person is not present? for if you are his accuser, yet he is not present,
and therefore cannot be tried. And the cause is not one that concerns Rome, so that you should be believed
as being the Emperor; but it is a matter that concerns a Bishop; for the trial ought to be conducted on equal
terms both to the accuser and the accused. And besides, how can you accuse him? for you could not be
present to witness the conduct of one who lived at so great a distance from you; and if you speak but what
you have heard from these, you ought also to give credit to what he says; but if you will not believe him,
while you do believe them, it is plain that they assert these things for your sake, and accuse Athanasius
only to gratify you?'--when he heard this, thinking that what they had so truly spoken was an in-suit to
himself, he sent them into banishment; and being exasperated against Athanasius, he wrote in a more
savage strain, requiring that he should suffer what has now befallen him, and that the Churches should be
given up to the Arians, and that they should be allowed to do whatever they pleased.

77. Constantius the precursor of Antichrist.

   Terrible indeed, and worse than terrible are such proceedings; yet conduct suitable to him who assumes
the character of Antichrist Who that beheld him taking the lead of his pretended Bishops, and presiding in
Ecclesiastical causes, would not justly exclaim that this was 'the abomination of desolation[8]' spoken of by
Daniel? For having put on the profession of Christianity, and entering into the holy places, and standing
therein, he lays waste the Churches, transgressing their Canons, and enforcing the observance of his own
decrees. Will any one now venture to say that this is a peaceful time with Christians, and not a time of
persecution? A persecution indeed, such as never arose before, and such as no one perhaps will again stir
up, except 'the son of lawlessness[9],' do these enemies of Christ exhibit, who already present a picture of
him in their own persons. Wherefore it especially behoves us to be sober, lest this heresy which has
reached such a height of impudence, and has diffused itself abroad like the 'poison of an adder[10],' as it is
written in the Proverbs, and which teaches doctrines contrary to the Saviour; lest, I say, this be that 'falling
away[11],' after which He shall be revealed, of whom Constantius is surely the forerunner[1]. Else
wherefore is he so mad against the godly? wherefore does he contend for it as his own heresy, and call
every one his enemy who will not comply with the madness of Arius, and admit gladly the allegations of
the enemies of Christ, and dishonour so many venerable Councils? why did he command that the Churches
should be given up to the Arians? was it not that, when that other comes, he may thus find a way to enter
into them, and may take to himself him who has prepared those places for him? For the ancient Bishops
who were ordained by Alexander, and by his predecessor Achillas, and by Peter before him, have been cast
out; and those introduced whom the companions of soldiers nominated; and they nominated only such as
promised to adopt their doctrines.

78. Alliance of Meletians with Arians.

   This was an easy proposition for the Meletians to comply with; for the greater part, or rather the whole
of them, have never had a religious education, nor are they acquainted with the 'sound faith[2]' in Christ,
nor do they know at all what Christianity is, or what writings we Christians possess. For having come out,
some of them from the worship of idols, and others from the senate, or from the first civil offices, for the
sake of the miserable exemption[3] from duty and for the patronage they gained, and having bribed[4] the
Meletians who preceded them, they have been advanced to this dignity even before they had been under
instruction, And even if they pretended to have been such, yet what kind of instruction is to be obtained
among the Meletians? But indeed without even pretending to be under instruction, they came at once, and
immediately were called Bishops, just as children receive a name. Being then persons of this description,
they thought the thing of no great consequence, nor even supposed that piety was different from impiety.
Accordingly from being Meletians they readily and speedily became Arians; and if the Emperor should
command them to adopt any other profession, they are ready to change again to that also. Their ignorance
of true godliness quickly brings them to submit to the prevailing folly, and that which happens to be first
taught them. For it is nothing to them to be carried about by every wind[5] and tempest, so long as they are
only exempt from duty, and obtain the patronage of men; nor would they scruple probably to change
again[6] to what they were before, even to become such as they were when they were heathens. Any how,
being men of such an easy temper, and considering the Church as a civil senate, and like heathen being
idolatrously minded, they put on the honourable name[7] of the Saviour, under which they polluted the
whole of Egypt, by causing so much as the name of the Arian heresy to be known therein. For Egypt has
heretofore been the only country, throughout which the profession of the orthodox faith was boldly
maintained[8]; and therefore these misbelievers have striven to introduce jealousy there also, or rather not
they, but the devil who has stirred them up, in order that when his herald Antichrist shall come, he may
find that the Churches in Egypt also are his own, and that the Meletians have already been instructed in his
principles, and may recognise himself as already formed[9] in them.

79. Behaviour of the Meletians contrasted with that of the Alexandrian Christians.

   Such is the effect of that iniquitous order which was issued by Constantius. On the part of the people
there was displayed a ready alacrity to submit to martyrdom, and an increased hatred of this most impious
heresy; and yet lamentations for their Churches, and groans burst from all, while they cried unto the Lord,
'Spare Thy people, O Lord, and give not Thine heritage unto Thine enemies to reproach[1];' but make haste
to deliver us out of the hand of the lawless[2]. For behold, they have not spared Thy servants, but are
preparing the way for Antichrist.' For the Meletians will never resist him, nor will they care for the truth,
nor will they esteem it an evil thing to deny Christ. They are men who have not approached the word with
sincerity; like the chameleon[3] they assume every various appear ante; they are hirelings of any who will
make use of them. They make not the truth their aim, but prefer before it their present pleasure; they say
only, 'Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die[4].' Such a profession and faithless temper is more worthy
of Epicritian[5] players than of Meletians. But the faithful servants of our Saviour, and the true Bishops
who believe with sincerity, and live not for themselves, but for the Lord; these faithfully believing in our
Lord Jesus Christ, and knowing, as I said before, that the charges which were alleged against the truth were
false, and plainly fabricated for the sake of the Arian heresy (for by the recantation[6] of Ursacius and
Valens they detected the calumnies which were devised against Athanasius, for the purpose of removing
him out of the way, and of introducing into the Churches the impieties of the enemies of Christ); these, I
say, perceiving all this, as defenders and preachers of the truth, chose rather, and endured to be insulted and
driven into banishment, than to subscribe against him, and to hold communion with the Arian madmen.
They forgot not the lessons they had taught to others; yea, they know well that great dishonour remains for
the traitors, but for them which confess the truth, the kingdom of heaven; and that to the careless and such
as fear Constantius will happen no good thing; but for them that endure tribulations here, as sailors reach a
quiet haven after a storm, as wrestlers receive a crown after the combat, so these shall obtain great and
eternal joy and delight in heaven;--such as Joseph obtained after those tribulations; such as the great Daniel
had after his temptations and the manifold conspiracies of the courtiers against him; such as Paul now
enjoys, being crowned by the Saviour; such as the people of God everywhere expect. They, seeing these
things, were not infirm of purpose, but waxed strong in faith[7], and increased in their zeal more and more.
Being fully persuaded of the calumnies and impieties of the heretics, they condemn the persecutor, and in
heart and mind run together the same course with them that are persecuted, that they also may obtain the
crown of Confession.

80. Duty of separating from heretics.

   One might say much more against this detestable and antichristian heresy, and might demonstrate by
many arguments that the practices of Constantius are a prelude to the coming of Antichrist. But seeing that,
as the Prophet[8] has said, from the feet even to the head there is no reasonableness in it, but it is full of all
filthiness and all impiety, so that the very name of it ought to be avoided as a dog's vomit or the poison of
serpents; and seeing that Costyllius openly exhibits the image of the adversary[9]; in order that our words
may not be too many, it will be well to content ourselves with the divine Scripture, and that we all obey the
precept which it has given us both in regard to other heresies, and especially respecting this. That precept is
as follows; 'Depart ye, depart ye, go ye out from thence, touch no unclean thing; go ye out of the midst of
them, and be ye separate, that bear the vessels of the Lord[10]' This may suffice[11] to instruct us all, so
that if any one has been deceived by them, he may go out from them, as out of Sodom, and not return again
unto them, lest he suffer the fate of Lot's wife; and if any one has continued from the beginning pure from
this impious heresy, he may glory in Christ and say, 'We have not stretched out our hands to a strange
god[12]; neither have we worshipped the works of our own hands, nor served the creature[13] more than
Thee, the God that hast created all things through Thy word, the Only-Begotten Son our Lord Jesus Christ,
through whom to Thee the Father together with the same Word in the Holy Spirit be glory and power for
ever and ever. Amen.'

The Second Protest[1].

   81. The people of the Catholic Church in Alexandria, which is under the government of the most
Reverend Bishop Athanasius, make this public protest by those whose names are under-written.

   We have already protested against the nocturnal assault which was committed upon ourselves and the
Lord's house; although in truth there needed no protest in respect to proceedings with which the whole city
has been already made acquainted. For the bodies of the slain which were discovered were exposed in
public, and the bows and arrows and other arms found in the Lord's house loudly proclaim the iniquity.

   But whereas after our Protest already made, the most illustrious Duke Syrianus endeavours to force all
men to agree with him, as though no tumult had been made, nor any had perished (wherein is no small
proof that these things were not done according to the wishes of the most gracious Emperor Augustus
Constantius; for he would not have been so much afraid of the consequences of this transaction, had he
acted therein by command); and whereas also, when we went to him, and requested him not to do violence
to any, nor to deny what had taken place, he ordered us, being Christians, to be beaten with clubs; thereby
again giving proof of the nocturnal assault which has been directed against the Church:--

   We therefore make also this present Protest, certain of us being now about to travel to the most religious
Emperor Augustus: and we adjure Maximus the Prefect of Egypt, and the Controllers[2], in the name of
Almighty God, and for the sake of the salvation of the most religious Augustus Constantius, to relate all
these things to the piety of Augustus, and to the authority of the most illustrious Prefects[3]. We adjure also
the masters of vessels, to publish these things everywhere, and to carry them to the ears of the most
religious Augustus, and to the Prefects and the Magistrates in every place, in order that it may be known
that a war has been waged against the Church, and that, in the times of Augustus Constantius, Syrianus has
caused virgins and many others to become martyrs.

   As it dawned upon the fifth before the Ides of February[4], that is to say, the fourteenth of the month
Mechir, while we were keeping vigil[5] in the Lord's house, and engaged in our prayers (for there was to
be a communion on the Preparation[6]); suddenly about midnight, the most illustrious Duke Syrianus
attacked us and the Church with many legions of soldiers[7] armed with naked swords and javelins and
other warlike instruments, and wearing helmets on their heads; and actually while we were praying, and
while the lessons were being read, they broke down the doors. And when the doors were burst open by the
violence of the multitude, he gave command, and some of them were shooting; others shouting, their arms
rattling, and their swords flashing in the light of the lamps; and forthwith virgins were being slain, many
men trampled down, and falling over one another as the soldiers came upon them, and several were pierced
with arrows and perished. Some of the soldiers also were betaking themselves to plunder, and were
stripping the virgins, who were more afraid of being even touched by them than they were of death. The
Bishop continued sitting upon his throne, and exhorted all to pray. The Duke led on the attack, having with
him Hilarius the notary, whose part in the proceedings was shewn in the sequel. The Bishop was seized,
and barely escaped being torn to pieces; and having fallen into a state of insensibility, and appearing as one
dead, he disappeared from among them, and has gone we know not whither. They were eager to kill him.
And when they saw that many had perished, they gave orders to the soldiers to remove out of sight the
bodies of the dead. But the most holy virgins who were left behind were buried in the tombs, having
attained the glory of martyrdom in the times of the most religious Constantius. Deacons also were beaten
with stripes even in the Lord's house, and were shut up there.

   Nor did matters stop even here: for after all this had happened, whosoever pleased broke open any door
that he could, and searched, and plundered what was within. They entered even into those places which not
even all Christians are allowed to enter. Gorgonius, the commander of the city force[8], knows this, for he
was present. And no unimportant evidence of the nature of this hostile assault is afforded by the
circumstance, that the armour and javelins and swords borne by those who entered were left in the Lord's
house. They have been hung up in the Church until this time, that they might not be able to deny it: and
although they sent several times Dynamius the soldier[8], as well as the Commander[9] of the city police,
desiring to take them away, we would not allow it, until the circumstance was known to all.

   Now if an order has been given that we should be persecuted we are all ready to suffer martyrdom. But
if it be not by order of Augustus, we desire Maximus the Prefect of Egypt and all the city magistrates to
request of him that they may not again be suffered thus to assail us. And we desire also that this our
petition may be presented to him, that they may not attempt to bring in hither any other Bishop: for we
have resisted unto death[10], desiring to have the most Reverend Athanasius, whom God gave us at the
beginning, according to the succession of our fathers; whom also the most religious Augustus Constantius
himself sent to us with letters and oaths. And we believe that when his Piety is informed of what has taken
place, he will be greatly displeased, and will do nothing contrary to his oaths, but will again give orders
that our Bishop Athanasius shall remain with us.

   To the Consuls to be elected[11] after the Consulship of the most illustrious Arbaethion and
Collianus[12], on the seventeenth Mechir[13], which is the day before the Ides of February.


Taken from "The Early Church Fathers and Other Works" originally published
by Wm. B. Eerdmans Pub. Co. in English in Edinburgh, Scotland, beginning in
1867. (LNPF II/IV, Schaff and Wace). The digital version is by The
Electronic Bible Society, P.O. Box 701356, Dallas, TX 75370, 214-407-WORD.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
  The electronic form of this document is copyrighted.
  Copyright (c) Eternal Word Television Network 1996.
  Provided courtesy of:

       EWTN On-Line Services
       PO Box 3610
       Manassas, VA 22110
       Voice: 703-791-2576
       Fax: 703-791-4250
       Data: 703-791-4336
       FTP: ftp.ewtn.com
       Telnet: ewtn.com
       WWW: http://www.ewtn.com.
       Email address: [email protected]

-------------------------------------------------------------------

You are viewing proxied material from gopher.ratthing.com. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.