Among other aberrations many feminists seem to be trying to
present Sophia, Wisdom, as a goddess.
They may notice that Moses told the people their laws are
wisdom - that means, they follow divine wisdom which is not a
person, but wise rules to lead them into good things, and to
avoid the evils that lurk in the very nature of things, e.g.,
a hangover after a drunk, or a high danger of a loveless
marriage after much premarital sex.
Many feminists notice what is true, that towards the end of
the OT, Wisdom was personified - but that was only a
rhetorical personification. Surely the OT writers never
thought of her as a separate person, still less as a goddess.
They notice that Sophia is feminine -- what ignorance! Yes, it
is grammatically feminine in Latin, Greek and in Hebrew -- but
that grammatical gender has nothing whatsoever to do with real
sex: it is only a grammatical convention.
They argue that now with less patriarchy our images change.
Even if so, that does not change what we said above. The use
of a symbol must not be confused with a reality or a real
person.
The case of many feminists is indeed sad. They are being
called professors of theology. Those of this type described
could be called at most protestant professors, not at all
Catholic professors. We said at most protestant - for real
protestantism knows wisdom was only a symbol, was never meant
as a person, still less as one to be worshipped.
Academic freedom means the right of a properly qualified
professor, lecturing in his own field, to put out his own
opinions without hindrance. But a professor is not properly
qualified if he/she does not follow the method proper to the
field. Now in theology we follow the sources of revelation,
and, if we are Catholic, that means the sources, as
interpreted by the Church. Cf. "Dei verbum" #10: "The task of
authoritatively interpreting the word of God, whether written
or handed on [Scripture or Tradition] has been entrusted
exclusively to the living Magisterium of the Church, whose
authority is exercised in the name of Jesus Christ."
Imagine a science professor who would want to go back to old
or medieval methods in science. He could not claim academic
freedom, would be laughed off campus. So people who claim to
be Catholic theologians and do not follow Catholic method are
not Catholic theologians at all, and have no claim to academic
freedom.
It is cause for dismay that some so-called scholarly journals
are accepting articles from those who intentionally skew
evidence. Any scholarly work in any field must strive for
objectivity: these people strive for the opposite. So they
should be really banished from academia, and any institution
that harbors them is disgraced, as also journals who publish
such things.
Some feminists want intensely to be priests. We suspect it is
a case of insane jealousy - that that into which King Saul
seems to have fallen. Even when the Pope has issued an
infallible statement saying it is impossible, they will not
stop trying. On priest friend of mine went to a celebration at
a large convent. But he was not allowd by the sisters to
concelebrate - would offend them. Yet two of them sat in the
sanctuary on each side of the celebrant.
Strangely, their desire seems to be largely motivated by a
desire for power in the Church. What folly! There is no one in
the Church with less clout than a priest. A bishop can mash
him, put him away into the boondocks for any reason. But
"nuns" have been known to tell the Pope off in public, and get
away with it.
