No one could accuse the Catholic Church of disguising her antipathy to Freemasonry.
Scarcely 20 years after the organization of modern Masonry in 1717 Pope Clement XII
forbade membership in the lodge and since then seven other popes have warned the
faithful against the dangers of Masonic naturalism to the Christian faith.
Catholics who join the Masonic sect are automatically excommunicated. Except at the
point of death only the pope or his delegated representative can lift this
excommunication in the external forum. Such a "Catholic" Mason deprives himself of
the spiritual benefits of the Church, may not receive the sacraments, and cannot be
given Christian burial nor be interred in consecrated ground. A Mason who desires to
enter the Church must cut all ties with the lodge. A Mason who wishes to marry a
Catholic woman must reveal his lodge affiliation in signing the pre-nuptial
questionnaire.
Excommunication is a drastic penalty but its object is to cure the offenders and bring
them back to the Church. Obviously a non-Catholic cannot be excluded from the
communion of the faithful to which he does not belong. Masonic jibing at the in
effectiveness of papal excommunication for Protestant and Jewish Masons betrays a
complete misunderstanding of the term. The Church does not excommunicate Masons.
She excommunicates Catholics who freely elect to worship the Grand Architect of the
lodge rather than the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
In previous chapters we have examined the chief reasons for the Church's severe
attitude toward Masonry. Masonry constitutes a religion of naturalism which considers
the basic Christian doctrines of the Trinity, the Incarnation, the Atonement, the
necessity of baptism, and the role of the Church in the plan of salvation to be quite
incidental. The lodge furthermore exacts a series of oaths from its candidates which
cannot be called valid extrajudicial oaths; those who swear such oaths, agreeing to the
most horrible self-mutilation in order to protect a few passwords and secret grips, are
objectively guilty of either vain or rash swearing. Third, the Masonic order has
historically sought to destroy the Catholic Church and to substitute a purely secular
society. Posing as nonpartisan in religious affairs the lodge plumps for abolishment of
parochial schools, easy divorce laws, cremation, suppression of religious orders
especially the Society of Jesus, and a separation of Church and State never envisioned
by the framers of the First Amendment. In addition, American Freemasonry
discriminates against Negroes, promotes a spirit of religious indifference, lends itself to
manifold injustices through preferential treatment of Masons by Masons, and expunges
the name of Christ from lodge prayers and from Bible passages used in the ritual.
Pope Clement directed his bull In <Eminenti> (April 28, 1738) against Francis, Grand
Duke of Tuscany, who had sponsored Masonic lodges within his domain. The bull read
in part:
It has become known to us, even in truth by public rumor, that great and extensive
progress is being made by, and the strength daily increasing of, some Societies,
Meetings, Gatherings, Conventicles or Lodges commonly known as of <Liberi
Muratori>, or Freemasons or some other nomenclature according to difference of
language, in which men of any religion and sect whatsoever, content with a certain
affectation of natural virtue, are associated mutually in a close and exclusive bond in
accordance with laws and statutes framed for themselves; and are bound as well by a
stringent oath sworn upon the Sacred Volume, as by the imposition of heavy penalties
to conceal under inviolable silence, what they secretly do in their meetings.
But since it is the nature of wickedness to betray itself, and to cry aloud so as to reveal
itself, hence the aforesaid Societies or Conventicles have excited so strong suspicion in
the minds of the faithful that to enroll oneself in these Lodges is quite the same, in the
judgment of prudent and virtuous men, as to incur the brand of depravity and
perverseness, for if they were not acting ill, they would not by any means have such a
hatred of the light. And this repute has spread to such a degree that in very many
countries the societies just mentioned have been proscribed, and with foresight
banished long since as though hostile to the safety of kingdoms.
We, accordingly, turning over in our mind the very serious injuries which are in the
highest degree inflicted by such Societies or Conventicles not merely on the tranquillity
of the temporal state, but also on the spiritual welfare of souls, and perceiving that they
are inconsistent alike with civil and canonical sanctions, being taught by the divine
word that it is our duty, by day and night, like a faithful servant, and a prudent ruler of
his master's household, to watch that no persons of this kind like thieves break into the
house, and like foxes strive to ravage the vineyard, that is to say, thereby pervert the
hearts of the simple and privily shoot at the innocent; in order to close the wide road
which might be opened thereby for perpetrating iniquity with impunity and for other
just and reasonable causes known to ourselves, have determined and decreed that these
same Societies, Meetings, Gatherings, Lodges or Conventicles, of <Liberi Muratori>, or
Freemasons, or by whatever other name called, herein acting on the advice of some
Venerable Brethren of ours, Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, and also of our own
motion, and from our certain knowledge, and mature deliberation, and in the plenitude
of Apostolic Power, should be condemned and prohibited as by this present
Constitution we do condemn and prohibit them.
Wherefore we direct the faithful in Christ, all and singly, of whatever status, grade,
dignity and preeminence, whether laics or clerics as well secular as regular, even those
worthy of specific and individual mention and expression, strictly and in virtue of holy
obedience, that no one, under any pretext or farfetched color dare or presume to enter
the above mentioned Societies of <Liberi Muratori>, Freemasons, or otherwise named,
or to propagate, foster and receive them whether in their houses or elsewhere, and to
conceal them, or be present at them, or to afford them the opportunity or facilities for
being convened anywhere, or otherwise to render them advice, help or favor, openly or
in secret, directly or indirectly, of themselves or through the agency of others in
whatever way; and likewise to exhort, induce, incite or persuade others to be enrolled
in, reckoned among, or take part in Societies of this kind, or to aid and foster them in
any way whatsoever; but in every particular to abstain utterly as they are in duty
bound from the same Societies, Meetings, Assemblies, Gatherings, Lodges, or
Conventicles, on pain of excommunication to be incurred by all who in the above ways
offend-to be incurred ipso facto without any declaration, and that from this
excommunication no one, except on the point of death, can obtain benefit of absolution
except through Us, or the Roman Pontiff for the time being.
Communications in 1738 did not encompass the daily newspapers, magazines, radio,
TV, and motion pictures of today, and hence the Catholic world did not immediately
know of the contents of the bull. According to ancient Church practice a bull was not
promulgated in a given diocese until it is posted and means are obtained to enforce it.
Where Masonry was not yet a problem or where secular authorities prevailed upon
individual bishops the promulgation was delayed for many years. To add to the
confusion a bogus bull was circulated which asked the faithful to support the lodges
whenever possible!
Consequently we find that some Catholics, particularly in Ireland, continued to join the
lodge after the papal pronouncement. Some served as Worshipful Masters and some
lodges were composed entirely of Catholic priests and laymen. Even the Irish patriot
Daniel O'Connell served as Master of Dublin Lodge No. 189 after his initiation in 1799.
In 1837 he testified that he had renounced the lodge some years before. Lord Petre, a
prominent Roman Catholic, became Grand Master of the English lodge in 1772 and
served in this capacity for five years.
Daniel Carroll, brother of the first American bishop, was active in Masonry and
apparently Bishop Carroll did not consider the papal ban applicable to this country
until sometime after 1800. For example, the bishop discussed the various censures of
the Holy See on the lodge question in a letter to a layman in 1794. He added, "I do not
pretend that these decrees are received generally by the Church, or have full authority
in this diocese." A convent of nuns in Nantes sent a Masonic apron to George
Washington as a present. Masons laid the cornerstone for St. Mary's church, first
Catholic church in Albany and first cathedral of that diocese. Catholics in the Louisiana
Territory were likely to be members of the lodge and Father Sedella, pastor of the New
Orleans cathedral, was buried in Masonic regalia.
Clement's successor, Pope Benedict XIV, was equally adamant against the spreading
secret societies, especially Freemasonry. He asked Maria Theresa, Empress of Austria,
to disband the lodge in Vienna. Police almost arrested her husband, Francis, when they
raided the lodge room but the Duke escaped through a back door. The captured
Masons were detained for a day or two but the lodge soon resumed underground
activities. Benedict issued a second bull in 1751 reiterating the penalty of
excommunication.
Present-day readers may consider some of the papal charges to be wide of the mark.
Masons delight in pointing to distinguished American statesmen and asking if these are
the depraved and perverted men whom the popes identify. At the same time the only
Catholic Church which Masonic polemicists seem to know at firsthand is the Church of
the Spanish Inquisition. Masons should remember that these early bulls against the
lodge were written long before the American Revolution. When the popes say "now" in
these bulls they mean the mid-1700's and when they spoke of Masonry they meant the
European Masonry which they knew. That the charges in these pronouncements
blacken the character of the neighborhood druggist or filling station operator who
joined the local F. & A. M. Lodge to sell more pills or gasoline or just to get away for an
evening with the boys would be a just criticism if we ignored the time and
circumstances. Today, more than two centuries later, the character of individual
Masons is not the point; Catholics are warned against the enticements of the lodge but
not because the lodge promotes communism or perversion or subversion or carousing
or atheism.
Pius VII (1821), Leo XII (1825), Pius VIII (1829), and Gregory XVI (1832) issued bulls
against Freemasonry and the host of secret societies which were infesting the continent
and thriving on intrigue, assassination, and subversion. Freethinkers flocked to the
lodges as the natural base from which to attack Church and State. Today the same sort
of person would naturally gravitate toward the Socialist and Communist parties which
promise to overthrow the present social order. Italian Masonry was disrupted by feuds
and schisms but the chief leaders of the Italian unification movement were all Masons:
Mazzini, Garibaldi, and Cavour.
Pope Pius IX issued six bulls on Freemasonry between 1846 and 1873 His 1865
Allocution pointed out:
Among the numerous machinations and artifices by which the enemies of the Christian
name have tried to attack the Church of God, and sought to shake it and besiege it by
efforts superfluous in truth must undoubtedly be reckoned that perverse society of men
called Masonic, which at first confined to darkness and obscurity, now comes into light
for the common ruin of religion and human society.
Bishop John McGill of Richmond castigated the lodge in a pastoral letter published in
1884:
(Masonry) professes a great respect for religion, declaring that only men who respect
religion can be members, and it amuses its members with a display of the Bible and
certain prayers and religious terms, and while it inculcates the belief that the love of
man and mere human virtues are all-sufficient and alone necessary, and in this manner
it more effectually combats Christianity than can be done by the hosts of immoral and
infidel writers who are openly laboring for its destruction. It is, mighty in its agency,
because it professes to dispose of the goods of the present life. It places its sword at the
entrance of all the avenues of trade, business and professional life, and gives the
accolade of patronage and success only to those who have learned its catechism and
been initiated through the means of its supernatural signs. Its influence seriously affects
all who refuse to enroll their names upon its list, upon all the fields of competition and
follows its members with the benefits of aid and protection upon the battlefields, in the
prisons, before the tribunals of justice and at the hustings. It throws the veil of
concealment over its chief end and its internal administration by the requirements of a
solemn oath of secrecy, and only makes itself known to the public by its festive
processions with dazzling banners and regalia, and by its bountiful donations and
timely assistance to the widows and orphans of deceased members.
The notorious Leo Taxil case illustrates the credibility of some Catholics on the subject
of Masonry. Although the hoax was exposed, some of the fantastic ideas about Masonry
linger in Catholic folklore. Likewise, Masonic partisans point to the Taxil case as proof
positive that the Church's case against the lodge is built on falsehoods and
misunderstandings.
Taxil, a French anticlerical journalist, had written a sensational pot boiler called <Secret
Amours of Pius IX> and he now saw another chance to get rich quick and humiliate the
Church he despised. He pretended conversion, recanted his atheist writings, and was
received into the Church. He published a series of books entitled <Complete
Revelations of French Masonry> in which he accused the lodges of demon worship,
orgies, spiritualism, Black Masses, etc. Masons were guilty of every crime from ritual
murder to blasphemy according to convert Taxil who added that worship of Satan was
the object of the higher degrees. He claimed that Charleston, S. C., then headquarters of
the Scottish Rite Southern Jurisdiction, was the fountainhead of diabolical Masonry
with Pike as the Masonic pope. The high priestess of higher Masonry, a being with
supernatural powers who was known as "Diana," rebelled when Pike commanded her
to desecrate a host. She too authored books on Masonry which were ghost written by
Taxil.
Taxil was acclaimed as an outstanding authority on the inner workings of Masonry and
was featured speaker at an anti-Masonic congress at Trent in 1896. The 1000 delegates
clamored for an appearance by the mysterious Diana and Taxil promised to produce
her in Paris on Easter Monday, 1897. Instead the anti-Masonic mountebank astonished
his admirers by announcing that his conversion 12 years earlier was a pretense, Diana a
myth, and his revelations pure fiction.
The unbelievable gullibility of some Catholics in the Taxil case may serve as a
wholesome lesson in examining Masonry. The Christian case against the lodge will
never be served by checking intelligence and common sense at the door. During the
course of research on this book the author has heard tales of Masonic doings hardly less
incredible than Taxil's famous fabrications. One clergyman solemnly described the
death lottery in which all 33rd degree Masons participate. Every year one name is
drawn and the winner (loser) must agree to commit suicide in the following year for
the greater glory of Freemasonry!
On the other hand, we cannot absolve the Masons for resorting to wild exaggeration
and fables in seeking to discredit the papal condemnations. For years they circulated
the canard that Popes Benedict XIV and Pius IX had themselves been initiated into the
lodge. Such preposterous stories have been retold in the pages of the New Age
although they have the same sort of historical basis as the legend of Pope Joan. In a
solemn allocution on April 20, 1849, Pius IX referred to the rumor about his Masonic
initiation and denounced it as "the blackest of all calumnies."
One of the greatest modern popes, Leo XIII, was also one of Masonry's stanches" foes.
This has embarrassed those Masons who argue that only political reactionaries among
the hierarchy used the lodge as a red herring to divert the attention of the people from
needed social reforms. Because of its paramount importance in understanding the
position of the Church on Freemasonry we have reproduced the encyclical,
<Humanum genus>. In this 1884 encyclical Pope Leo indicates that the human race is
divided into two opposing camps, one under God and the other under Satan. "At every
period of time each has been in conflict with the other, with a variety and multiplicity
of weapons, and of warfare, although not always with equal ardor and assault. At this
period, however, the partisans of evil seem to be combining together, and to be
struggling with united vehemence, led on or assisted by that strongly organized and
widespread association called the Freemasons," declared the pontiff. Of course, the
Holy Father did not mean that all Masons are wicked and all Christians, saintly. He is
speaking of the spirit of the Church and the spirit of Masonic naturalism as unalterably
opposed to one another. Pike replied to the pope's denunciation by delivering a
Praelocution in October, 1884. This consisted mainly in a recital of alleged horrors of
the Inquisition and misdeeds of the Church of Rome. Said the head of the Southern
Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite, "If, in other countries, Freemasonry has lost sight of the
Ancient Landmarks, even tolerating communism and atheism, it is better to endure ten
years of these evils than it would be to live a week under the devilish tyranny of the
Inquisition and of the black soldiery of Loyola. Atheism is a dreary unbelief, but it at
least does not persecute, torture, or roast men who believe there is a God." Tragically,
history and international Communism have proved General Pike to be wrong.
The General went out of his way to deny any basic distinction between American and
Latin and Continental Masonry:
It is not when the powers of the Papacy are concentrated to crush the Freemasonry of
the Latin Kingdoms and Republics of the world, that the Masons of the Ancient and
Accepted Scottish Rite in the United States will, from any motive whatever, proclaim
that they have no sympathy with the Masons of the Continent of Europe or with those
of Mexico or of the South American Republics. If these fall into errors of practice or
indulge in extravagances of dogma, we will dissent and remonstrate; but we will not
forget that the Freemasonry of our Rite and of the French Rite has always been the
Apostle of Civil and Religious Liberty, and that the blood of Spanish and other Latin
Freemasons has again and again glorified and sanctified the implements of torture, the
scaffold and the stake, of the Papacy and the Inquisition.
In a later reply to the encyclical Pike boasts:
It is the crowning glory of Freemasonry that, requiring only that a Candidate shall
believe and put his trust in a living and personal God, a beneficent and protecting
Providence, to whom it is not folly to pray; and shall believe in the continued existence
of the Soul of man after the death of the body, it receives into its Lodges the Christian
of every sect the Hebrew, the Moslem and the Parsee, and unites them in the holy
bonds of brotherhood.
Pope Leo's final word on Freemasonry was delivered in 1902. The official position of
the Church regarding membership in the lodge was stated in the Code of Canon Law
issued by Benedict XV in 1917. Since then the Holy See has been preoccupied with the
immense problems of two world wars, the rise of nationalism, Fascism, and Nazism,
the tremendous advance of atheistic Communism which has engulfed 800 million
people, the possibilities of H-bomb annihilation. The position of the Church on
Freemasonry could not be made clearer and the recent pontiffs have not felt the need to
restate what their predecessors have repeatedly declared.
The present Holy Father, however, may have had Masonry in mind in his 1955 May
Day address when he warned, "Laws and institutions are of little worth if the ordinary
man sees in his daily life that everything depends on influential connections which he,
unlike others, does not possess; or if he suspects that behind the facade of what is called
the State there lies concealed the manipulations of powerful organized groups."
For more than 200 years the Catholic Church has called attention to the anti-Christian
basis of modern Masonry. What originated as Catholic guilds engaged in erecting the
magnificent cathedrals of the Middle Ages has become one of the implacable enemies
of the Church. The points on which the lodge stands condemned are not the
peculiarities of the French Grand Orient or other "schismatic" Masonic bodies. The
recent popes, particularly Leo XIII, were well aware that the bulk of the world's Masons
were English and American. Their lodges have been condemned for their religious
naturalism not their atheism, for their immoral oaths, for their historic if technically
unofficial anticlericalism. As we shall see, millions of Protestant and Eastern Orthodox
Christians belong to denominations which join in warning against affiliation with the
Masonic sect.
Chapter 8 of "Christianity and American Freemasonry" by William J. Whalen,
published by The Bruce Publishing Company.
