[Congressional Record: June 20, 2002 (Senate)]
[Page S5822-S5823]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:cr20jn02-133]




                                AMTRAK

 Mr. DOGRAN. Mr. President, my colleague from Illinois, Senator
Durbin, a moment ago spoke of the dilemma now faced by Amtrak, the
company that provides rail passenger service.
 The Secretary of Transportation earlier today provided a glimpse into
his and the administration's view of what to do about Amtrak. It is
clearly devastating, if you believe that we ought to have rail
passenger service.
 I confess, I like trains. I grew up in a small town where a train
called the Galloping Goose used to come through. We gathered to watch
the train come through our little town. I like trains. This isn't about
being nostalgic or liking trains. It is about whether you think our
country should have rail passenger service. The testimony this morning
by Mr. Gunn was that by mid next week, unless the financing is made
available, Amtrak will shut down. By mid next week, we will have no
rail passenger service because it will shut down, unless the Department
of Transportation and the other relevant agencies get together on the
financing package necessary.
 It is important that we have rail passenger service. Aside from the
urgent circumstances that face us next week, the other question is
this: What will the long-term plan be for an Amtrak rail passenger
system that works?
 The Secretary of Transportation said today that this is his plan:
Let's take the Northeast corridor and cut it off and sort of
semiprivatize it and sell it--I am not quite sure to whom--and then we
will let the rest of the system work on its own. That is a quick,
effective way to kill Amtrak. Yes, there will be Amtrak service from
Boston to Washington; that will continue. And the rest of the Amtrak
rail passenger service will die. Just as certainly as I am standing
here, we will see the collapse of rail passenger service in the rest of
the country.
 Last year, over 80,000 people boarded Amtrak in North Dakota. Anybody
who wonders is Amtrak important, ask yourself what happened on
September 11 following the devastating attacks by terrorists. Every
single commercial airplane, every private airplane was

[[Page S5823]]

forced to land. They had to find an airport and land and stop that
airplane. But Amtrak kept moving across the country, hauling people
back and forth across the country. Rail service is an important part of
this country's transportation system. It is that simple.
 To come up with a plan that says, by the way, what we will do is cut
off the Northeast corridor, which is the most lucrative part of the
system, and separate it from the rest of the country, is a way of
saying, let's kill Amtrak in most of America.
 Talk about a thoughtless public policy proposal. This is it.
 This Congress has some work to do. This administration needs to
address next week. Mr. Gunn says that Amtrak is going to shut down. The
President of Amtrak says he is going to shut down midweek unless the
Department of Transportation and others get their act together and
provide the interim financing necessary. They have an application
filed.
 One of my colleagues asked the people when they will act on that
application. Answer: Maybe next week.
 It ought to be now. This is not exactly a surprise. This problem with
Amtrak has been lingering for a long time, and this Congress seems
incapable, unwilling, or unable to make decisions that will put this
rail passenger system on a sound financial footing. Some of my
colleagues believe we just should kill Amtrak; let it die. What they
forget is that we subsidize every other form of transportation. You
name it, we subsidize it.

 They say: But we don't want to have a rail passenger service that is
subsidized. Everyone has the right to their opinion. But I think this
country is well served, strengthened, and we are improved by having a
national system of rail passenger service. No, it does not go
everywhere. It does not connect every city to every other city. But it
is a national system that connects the Northeast corridor to routes
throughout our country in a way that is advantageous to millions of
Americans.
 This Congress and this administration have to wake up, and they have
to wake up now. If we don't, and if they don't, we could find mid next
week a country in which all rail passenger service is gone. If we
don't, and if they don't, we could find beyond that, if they find the
interim financing for next week, we could find a rail passenger system
in which we have this crazy scheme of cutting off the Northeast
corridor, creating some sort of quasi-private or quasi-public system
with that, and saying the most lucrative portion of Amtrak shall not be
available to assist in offsetting other revenues from other parts of
the system. And we will inevitably create an Amtrak system that dies
everywhere in the country except for the Northeast corridor. That is
not a vision that is good for our country.
 This is not the kind of issue that ought to hang up the Congress. It
is not complicated. We deal with a lot of complicated issues. This is
not one of them. It is very simply a question to this administration
that has been sitting on its hands for a long time on this issue. It
ought to stop. It ought to take some action. And this Congress ought to
take action for the long term.
 The question is this: Do you believe in rail passenger service or
not? Do you believe this country is strengthened by having a national
system of rail passenger service? If you believe it is not and you
don't like rail passenger service and you want to kill Amtrak, just go
ahead and do it, if you have the votes.
 But what is happening is inaction, both by the administration and
inaction by Congress, which is slowly but surely strangling the life
out of this system called Amtrak.
 It makes no sense to me. Let's make a decision.
 I count myself on the ``aye'' side. I say aye when you call the roll
to ask do we want to support Amtrak; do we want to have a national rail
passenger system in our future. The answer is clearly yes. I hope my
colleagues will agree. I hope we can all agree to stop all of the foot
dragging going on on this important question.
 I yield the floor.
 The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Minnesota.

                         ____________________

You are viewing proxied material from gopher.quux.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.