Ayale-com.776
net.space
utcsrgv!utzoo!decvax!yale-com!harley
Mon Feb 1 00:14:08 1982
poking in here
first i note that talking of a dualism of technologists & humanists is
like giving emphasis to the itsy-bitsy tailends of a bellcurve.
then i wonder how the connection between humanism & art was made, so i
really wonder whether we have a consensus definition of humanism, or
just a meaningless word around which to rotate.
next, i consider trying to label the reagan government either
technologist or humanist ... & give up, but not without a fight.
then, fondling the notion that technologists are more "socially
valuable" than humanists, i try to reconcile the war machine.
and i see the technologists claiming that their work trickles down into
the wanting parts of society ...
.. but will no one agree that humanities trickle down even less
directly, but more evenly & (i dare ask) more positively?
(think about that; apply trickledown theory across the board & see what
it amounts to, beyond reaganism. what tricklesdown do you like best?)
and finally i realize that, technologist or humanist, most of you
are proud of your opinions but have given them little thought.
you should be ashamed; as elitists, you should be committed to excellence.
the last place i'd want to find the people doing this talking
would be in a position of power.
- steve harley (yale-comix!harley)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen <
[email protected]>
of
http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/
This Usenet Oldnews Archive
article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:
1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.
2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:
The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996
Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.
