Adopey.1985
net.math
utcsrgv!utzoo!decvax!duke!unc!dopey.bts
Fri Mar 19 10:46:33 1982
0.9999...  infinity

Then, the real numbers are the equivalence classes of  these
rational  sequences.   The  rational numbers we started with
are "embedded" in the reals by identifying  them  with  con-
stant   sequences.   Hence,  the  real  number  1/2  is  the
equivalence    class    of     the     rational     sequence
1/2,1/2,1/2,1/2,...
    To construct a  simple  "non-standard"  number  system,
start  with  sequences  of reals and an ultrafilter U on the
natural numbers, the indices for our sequences. (Here's  all
you  need  to  know about the ultrafilter we'll use.  It's a
collection of sets of indices.  Every set  of  indices  with
finite  complement is in U.  Every set of indices is in U or
its complement is in U.  And, if a set of indices is  in  U,
then  any super-set of indices of that set is in U as well.)
Now we say that two sequences s and t are equivalent, s ~ t,
if
               { n : s(n) = t(n) } is in U.

Now, as you'd expect, the non-standard reals  are  just  the
equivalence classes of the sequences of reals.  The standard
real numbers are embedded in the  non-standard  universe  by
identifying them with constant sequences.  For instance, the
real number pi is associated with the equivalence  class  of
the sequence pi,pi,pi,pi,... , a typical infinitesimal might
be the equivalence class of the sequence

       0.1, 0.01, 0.001, 0.0001, 0.00001, ...

and a typical infinite  element  might  be  the  equivalence
class of the sequence

       1, 10, 100, 1000, 10000, 100000, ...

    Finally-- and this is the  first  deviation  from  what
you'll find in a text on non-standard analysis-- let's agree
on the following interpretation of  non-terminating  decimal
fractions.   If x is a non-terminating decimal fraction, let
x(n) be the n-th symbol of  x,  read  from  left  to  right.
Associate  x  with the equivalence class of the sequence sx,
where

               sx(n) = x(1)x(2) ... x(n)

This  means that  0.9999...  will  be  associated  with  the
equivalence class of the sequence

       0, 0., 0.9, 0.99, 0.999, 0.9999, ...

    There's one more technical detail, then I'll  get  back
to  0.9999...  and  1.  In general, a formula about two ele-
ments of the non-standard universe is true if, when you take
a  sequence  from  each equivalence class the set of indices
for which the reals in the sequences satisfy the formula  is
in  U.   Let  s be the sequence of associated with 0.9999...
and t the constant sequence 1.  Then 0.9999...
<HR>
This Usenet Oldnews Archive
article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:
<P>
1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.
<BR>
2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:
<P>
<EM>The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright&copy 1981, 1996
<BR> Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.</EM>
<P>
<HR>
Goto <A HREF="82.03.24_yale-com.254_net.math.html">NEXT</A> article in NET.math Newsgroup
<BR>Return to <A HREF="NET.math-index.html">NET.math index</A>
<BR>Return to the
       <A HREF="../index.html">Usenet Oldnews Archive index</A>
</HTML>

-----------------------------------------------------------------
gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen <[email protected]>
of http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/


This Usenet Oldnews Archive
article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:

1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.

2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:

The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996
Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.