Alime.229
net.lan
utzoo!decvax!harpo!floyd!vax135!lime!martin
Fri Apr 23 09:22:16 1982
Re: IBM Series/1  Ring

From: lime!vax135!floyd!harpo!mhtsa!ihnss!ihnp1!gjm

There are various workable architectures for local area networks, and we
can argue inconclusively about theoretical properties. However since the
issue started and continues with an IBM title, we might be able to make
more definite conclusions about the IMPLEMENTATION of the IBM Series/1
Ring which is IBM's belated entry into the local area network market.

The IBM Series/1 Ring was evaluated along with over 20 other local area
networks in a recent market study.  Overall, it ranked poorly with
respect to most of the other networks whether baseband, broadband, or
PBX, and just plain "ranked" in the olfactory sense.

A major design goal of Series/1 Ring appears to be the selling of IBM
hardware.

       "IBM's proposed local network would require hundreds
       of Series/1 processors, about 20 rings, a System/370,
       and substantial software development.  Access to
       non-IBM hosts would be multiplexed on a 19.2K bps line.
       In short, the system would be complicated, slow, and
       expensive."

If I am not mistaken, all of the above would be required for a prototype
network for terminal networking for a location like IH.

The Series/1 has further problems to compound the issue.  The line cards
are not true full-duplex.  1200 baud seems to work fine, but higher baud
rates lead to dropped characters, and 9.6 terminal traffic is currently
impossible.  There is even some consideration toward replacing
Series/1's with Comten's for future MAXI systems.

My apologies to IBM aficionados, but this particular product appears
to be "ill-conceived and ill-timed".

ASIDE:  I am interested in further discussion on local area networks,
both theoretical and implemented.  Can a discussion of this be
continued in "net.lan" or a similar newsgroup?

-Gary Murakami
ihuxh!gjm

-----------------------------------------------------------------
gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen <[email protected]>
of http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/


This Usenet Oldnews Archive
article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:

1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.

2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:

The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996
Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.