Autzoo.1469
net.general
utcsrgv!utzoo!henry
Thu Mar 4 22:53:40 1982
replying to news
I got a modest number of replies to my last summary of opinion on
people replying to news when they should use mail. This may be the
last word on the subject, as traffic seems to have died down. To
summarize to date:
Again, the general trend of opinion was strong agreement with my
use-mail-not-news position. There was also general agreement that
sending news to the whole network should require more typing than
just "f-". There was a comment that it's too easy to do by accident,
and another that naive users often do not understand its implications.
(Also, somebody noted that the stupid "-" is rotten human engineering...)
There were several ideas as to what specifically should be done about
the matter. One good point was that f should NOT be in the "short list"
of things to do that news displays when prompting. [Pity B news has
already gone out, although it was probably a bit late for changes in
any case...] Having news explicitly request confirmation of intent was
also suggested [although I'm a bit more dubious about that -- it is a bit
of an annoyance to people who *do* know what they're doing]. It was
suggested that the *documentation* for news should explain the implications
of sending news a bit more clearly. [Maybe the first time somebody tries
to send something to news, it should give him a short quiz to see whether
he understands the consequences... Before certain people flame on, *no*
this is not a serious suggestion.]
Given that B news has already gone out to all and sundry, I guess the
best last word is one from the last letter I got on the subject:
The problem seems to be how to gently manipulate these
people [the ones using f inappropriately] so they will
mail their garbage in instead of polluting the network.
Although changing the invoking convention for the followup
command in some minor annoying way would work ... I feel
less drastic measures should be considered first; anti-
pollution citations could be mailed out to repeat offenders --
later, if the intransigent fools don't get the message,
there could be public stonings...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen <
[email protected]>
of
http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/
This Usenet Oldnews Archive
article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:
1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.
2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:
The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996
Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.
