Aucbvax.6519
fa.works
utcsrgv!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!works
Mon Mar 15 19:34:27 1982
TOPS-20 EXEC
>From Joe.Newcomer@Cmu-10a Thu Mar 11 12:25:58 1982
The last I looked, DEC was nut fussy at all about releasing the source code
to the EXEC; for a modest number of dollars you can get a source license
but I don't know if that is a site license or a processor license. Modest
is under $10K, which on a typical $750,000 KL20 just ain't all that much
additional.
One major difference between Unix and TOPS-20 is that on Unix I felt a
compulsion to rewrite the shell because it was so bad, but never had the
time to engage in the compulsion. I would like to do a few tweaks on
the TOPS-20 EXEC, which has it s own problems, but they are not a
major departure from the basic philosophy of the TOPS-20 EXEC. In the
case of Unix, I would never have considered using the shell code at all,
except possibly to see how some bizarre interface to the kernel was done.
It is such a poor piece ofinterface that I found it a constant aggravation
every time I typed a command.
joe
-----------------------------------------------------------------
gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen <
[email protected]>
of
http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/
This Usenet Oldnews Archive
article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:
1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.
2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:
The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996
Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.
