Aucbvax.5885
fa.info-vax
utcsrgv!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!info-vax
Thu Jan 21 02:05:24 1982
Re: pandora's box
>From Peter.Lucas@CMU-10A Thu Jan 21 02:02:35 1982
The favorite reasons (generally) *administrators*
(a dirty word) use for selecting VMS is
"maintainability". Our Psychology department
selected VMS for this reason, against the loud
protests of all who actually use the machine.
As both a user and a sometime *administrator* of the CMU psychology
vaxen (and one who was present at the proceedings), let me set the
record straight:
The issue of whether to run Unix or VMS in the department was
debated at great length in public forum. Our highest priorities were a
very stable, reliable lisp system -- not necessarily absolutely
state-of-the-art -- and one that could be easily maintained given our
limited resources and interest in system development. From these
discussions emerged a strong consensus favoring VMS. The final
decision was made by vote of the department computing committee, all of
whom are users and only I an *administrator*. There were exactly two
dissenting votes. The "loud protests" came from a small minority of
True Believers.
-PAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------
gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen <
[email protected]>
of
http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/
This Usenet Oldnews Archive
article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:
1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.
2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:
The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996
Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.