Aucbvax.1701
fa.info-terms
utzoo!duke!decvax!ucbvax!BHUBER@USC-ECL
Sat Jun 13 08:49:37 1981
Re:  IBM 3101 and 3102
In response to the message sent  12 Jun 1981 1024-PDT from Silverberg@SRI-KL

Knocking the IBM is okay by me, but I don't believe you should include
the absence of a meta key in the same category of condemnation.  I know
of very few terminals which do have such a key.  Might I recommend that
terminals which do have a meta key be flagged positively as such, but
terminals which do not have a meta key be the subject of neutral comments.
Bud
-------




-----------------------------------------------------------------
gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen <[email protected]>
of http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/


This Usenet Oldnews Archive
article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:

1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.

2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:

The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996
Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.

You are viewing proxied material from gopher.quux.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.