Aucbvax.5101
fa.editor-p
utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!editor-people
Wed Nov 11 01:06:57 1981
Text Formatting
>From CHILENSKAS@USC-ISIE Tue Nov 10 23:38:44 1981
I agree that this seems to be the right place to discuss
integrating editors into various other portions of the system such as text
formatting, program formatting and compilation, etc. The representations
one uses for text can make it hard or impossible to use current (or
desirable) editors on that text. Integrating editors into mail systems and
the programming cycle is another area that requires thought for
representation and program interfacing. It is relatively nice to have a
command to switch back and forth between the editor and compiler, but it
would be nicer to do incremental compiling or interpreting during the edit
session itself. IBM was suppose to have such a system for COBOL, FORTRAN
and 370 BAL back in 1975 but the people at Olin who evaluated it said that
the COBOL interface was clumsy. It took lots of time per statement and
still did not catch a lot of errors. The error messages flashing at you
were distracting to the main task of programming. In text editing there is
the question of "what you see is what you get" - obviously impossible on a
typical one font terminal if what you are really doing is typesetting.
Where are the reasonable compromises? Which of these compromises are
likely to change as hardware gets cheaper? With work stations? These are
the kinds of questions i had hoped to hear addressed when i joined the
list.
R Mark Chilenskas
Chilenskas@ISIE
-------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen <
[email protected]>
of
http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/
This Usenet Oldnews Archive
article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:
1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.
2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:
The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996
Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.
