Aucbvax.5778
fa.digest-p
utcsrgv!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!digest-people
Thu Jan 14 04:26:54 1982
To TCP or not to TCP?
>From CStacy@MIT-AI Thu Jan 14 03:43:53 1982
Since I guess we dont want to move the TCP/IP discussions onto
Digest-People (what an amusing twist!) I will send this one to the
group, but further messages should just go to the people interested.
Date: 14 January 1982 0206-PST (Thursday)
From: lauren at UCLA-Security (Lauren Weinstein)
Is there some good reason that the ITS machines cannot be
gatewayed through a supported machine? Even little 11's like
the 24 should be able to run some sort of existing TCP/IP
implementation. Rand-Unix currently talks to the ARPANET over
a 9600 baud tty line via an 11/34 running the NCP.
--Lauren--
No, there is not any real reason why we cannot set up some limited
gateway. However, the design of really complete gateways with
protocol translation like one would want is an unsolved research
question.
In fact we will probably implement some limited functionality to
connect our local network to the Internet, but we will not do any
development which requires a major software effort. To implement a
real TCP for an ITS machine would require about two years of heavy
duty full time system programming, and since we are rapidly phasing
out our timesharing machines we are not going to undertake such work.
We are not going to do anything until we wake up one day and discover
our plug being pulled out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen <
[email protected]>
of
http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/
This Usenet Oldnews Archive
article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:
1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.
2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:
The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996
Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.
