EFFector       Vol. 14, No. 22       Sep. 4, 2001     [email protected]

  A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation     ISSN 1062-9424

   In the 182nd Issue of EFFector (now with over 28,800 subscribers!):

    * ALERT: Stop Mandatory Monitoring of Federal Judges' Internet Use
    * Dmitry Sklyarov and Elcomsoft Arraigned in San Jose, CA; Plead Not
      Guilty
    * Music Share-in Festival in Golden Gate Park
    * ALERT: Friday, September 7 - International Day of Action Against
      Video Surveillance
    * Update: Opt-Out Alert Correction
    * Administrivia

  For more information on EFF activities & alerts: http://www.eff.org/

  To join EFF or make an additional donation:
    http://www.eff.org/support/
  EFF is a member-supported nonprofit. Please sign up as a member today!
    _________________________________________________________________

ALERT: Stop Mandatory Monitoring of Federal Judges' Internet Use

 EFF Requests Citizen Comments to Judicial Conference

   Electronic Frontier Foundation ACTION ALERT

   (Issued: Tuesday, September 4, 2001 / Deadline: September 11, 2001)

 Introduction:

  On September 11, the Judicial Conference of the United States will
  consider mandating Internet use monitoring for all employees of the
  federal judiciary, judges included. The Administrative Office of the
  Courts, which already secretly monitored Internet use without consent,
  worries that "a significant factor contributing to the growth of
  [Internet] traffic appear(s) to be related to personal, rather than
  business usage," even though Internet usage immediately and
  dramatically declined voluntarily in response to an appropriate-use
  memo that office sent out in March. Moreover, judges of the 9th U.S.
  Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ordered a one-week shutdown
  of the monitoring asserting that it is inappropriate and possibly
  illegal.

  The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) believes that if we can't
  trust judicial employees to use computers appropriately, then we
  shouldn't trust them to administer our courts. The intrusive
  monitoring of e-mail, Internet usage, case-related materials, and even
  private correspondence -- perhaps to be conducted by an outside
  commercial company -- raises serious privacy issues. Regardless of the
  legalities, spying on employees is bad policy, and anathema to a
  working environment that would otherwise attract trusted professionals
  and produce outstanding performance.

 What YOU Can Do Now:

    * Mail or e-mail the EFF letter below, or your own, to the Judicial
      Conference today. Feel free to use this letter verbatim, or modify
      it as you wish. Let the Conference know that you oppose Internet
      monitoring of judges. Please be polite and concise, but firm.
    * Contact your legislators about online privacy issues. For
      information on how to contact your legislators and other
      government officials, see EFF's "Contacting Congress and Other
      Policymakers" guide at:
        http://www.eff.org/congress.html
      In addition, please also send a copy of your letter to Sen.
      Charles Schumer (D-NY) at [email protected] and Rep.
      Howard Berman (D-CA-26) at [email protected], the key
      legislators on this issue.
    * Join EFF! For membership information see:
        http://www.eff.org/support/

 Sample Letter:

  EFF requests that concerned citizens write politely worded letters to
  the Judicial Conference of the United States opposing the proposal to
  require Internet monitoring of federal judiciary employees.

  Please make sure your comments ARRIVE before the September 11 meeting
  of the Judicial Conference. Specify that Ms. Siegel forward your
  comments to the Judicial Conference. Do NOT send spam-like or rude
  messages as they will be counterproductive.

  Use this sample letter to the Conference or modify it, and send to:

  Karen K. Siegel
  Attn: Judicial Monitoring Proposal
  Assistant Director, Office of Judicial Counsel
  Executive Secretariat
  Administrative Office of the United States Courts
  One Columbus Circle, NE
  Washington, D.C. 20544 USA

  Phone: +1 202 502-2400
  Fax: +1 202 502-1144
  E-mail: [email protected]
  Cc: Mel Bryson, [email protected]
      Terry Cain, [email protected]

    Dear Ms. Siegel and members of the Judicial Conference:

    Please forward my comments on this matter to all members of the
    Judicial Conference.

    I write to express my grave concern regarding the proposal to
    require monitoring of Internet use for federal judiciary employees.

    For our constitutional system to work, federal judges must remain
    independent -- that's one of the reasons we appoint them for life
    and prevent their salaries from being reduced. If independence
    really matters, it is entirely inappropriate to monitor judges'
    computer use.

    Judge Edith H. Jones puts it precisely: the AOC's recommendations
    "appear to confer enormous discretion on the judicial bureaucracy
    to continue monitoring communications and to make policy decisions
    regarding Internet and computer use that each judge should make for
    his or her chambers."

    The special role the judiciary plays in our society counsels
    against the adoption of a possibly illegal policy, which may
    violate the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, a federal law
    that protects the privacy of electronic communications.

    The question of whether and how employers may monitor their
    employees' online activities is raised in several current cases
    before the courts. Can the public honestly believe that a court
    system that refuses to value the privacy of its own employees can
    objectively pass upon the legality of workplace surveillance? Only
    if the Judicial Conference rejects the proposal and decides - as a
    policy matter - not to monitor employees' usage of their computers,
    will judges across the country remain able to evaluate impartially
    the legality of monitoring programs in cases that come before them.

    Regardless of the legalities, spying on employees is bad policy,
    and anathema to a working environment that would otherwise attract
    trusted professionals and encourage outstanding performance.

    I urge you to reject the Internet use monitoring proposal for
    federal judiciary employees.

    Sincerely,
    [Your full name]
    [Your address]

 Privacy Campaign:

  This drive to contact the Judiciary bureaucracy about their invasive
  policies is part of a larger campaign to highlight how extensively
  companies and governmental agencies subject us to surveillance and
  share and use personal information online, and what you can do about
  it.

  Check the EFF Privacy Now! Campaign website regularly for additional
  alerts and news:
    http://www.eff.org/privnow/

 Background:

  Jeff Rosen's article on judicial monitoring in The New Republic:
    http://www.tnr.com/091001/rosen091001.html

  Judge Jones's letter criticizing the Internet monitoring policy:
    http://eff.org/sc/judiciary/20010818_jones_judiciarycat_letter.html

  Administrative Office of the US Courts press release on report
  recommending Internet monitoring policy:
    http://eff.org/sc/judiciary/20010813_aousc_monitoring_pr.html

  Judicial Conference Commission on Automation and Technology report
  summary recommending Internet monitoring policy:
    http://eff.org/sc/judiciary/20010813_judiciarycat_report_summary.html

 About EFF:

  The Electronic Frontier Foundation is the leading civil liberties
  organization working to protect rights in the digital world. Founded
  in 1990, EFF actively encourages and challenges industry and
  government to support free expression, privacy, and openness in the
  information society. EFF is a member-supported organization and
  maintains one of the most linked-to Web sites in the world:
    http://www.eff.org

   Contacts:

    Lee Tien, EFF Senior First Amendment Attorney
      [email protected]
      +1 415-436-9333 x102

    Will Doherty, EFF Online Activist / Media Relations
      [email protected]
      +1 415-436-9333 x111

                                 - end -
    _________________________________________________________________


Dmitry Sklyarov and Elcomsoft Arraigned in San Jose, CA

 Plead Not Guilty to Conspiracy and Circumvention Trafficking Charges

   Sklyarov Faces 25 Years for Providing eBook Format Converter

   Electronic Frontier Foundation Media Release

   For Immediate Release: Tuesday, August 30, 2001

   Contacts:

    Cindy Cohn, EFF Legal Director
      [email protected]
      +1 415-436-9333 x108

    Will Doherty, EFF Online Activist / Media Relations
      [email protected]
      +1 415-436-9333 x111

  San Jose, California - Russian programmer Dmitry Sklyarov and his
  employer Elcomsoft today pled not guilty to charges of providing
  electronic book format conversion software in the United States.
  Sklyarov, who had the benefit of a court interpreter, spoke the plea
  himself in English.

  The court heard a five-count grand jury indictment against Elcomsoft
  and previously jailed programmer Sklyarov on charges of trafficking
  and conspiracy to traffic in a copyright circumvention device.

  Sklyarov -- who is out of custody on US$50,000 bail -- could face a
  prison term of up to twenty-five years and a US$2,250,000 fine. As a
  corporation, Elcomsoft faces a potential US$2,500,000 fine.

  "Dmitry has programmed a format converter which has many legitimate
  uses including enabling the blind to hear eBooks," explained Cindy
  Cohn, Electronic Frontier Foundation Legal Director. "The idea that he
  faces prison for this is outrageous. The EFF will support Dmitry
  through the end of this ordeal."

  "We were hoping that the government would see the wisdom and justice
  in not pursuing a case against Sklyarov," said his attorney, Joseph M.
  Burton of Duane Morris in San Francisco. "Even if one were to ignore
  the serious legal questions involving the DMCA, this case hardly cries
  out for criminal prosecution. Sklyarov's and Elcomsoft's actions are
  not conduct that Congress intended to criminalize. We will vigorously
  contest these charges."

  Sklyarov and his attorneys appeared at the arraignment with US
  Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg presiding. The next court appearance
  scheduled in the case is 9:00 AM Pacific on September 4 before Judge
  Ronald Whyte in the San Jose Federal Court building.

  Well-dressed observers attended the arraignment and nonviolent
  protests occurred in Moscow (Russia), London (England), Boston, San
  Francisco, Los Angeles, Reno, and Black Rock City, Nevada.

 UPDATE: Sept. 4, 2001

   Russian Programmer & Co. Case Continued

     Trial Schedule and Company Counsel Cause Delay to September 24

  San Jose, California - Russian programmer Dmitry Sklyarov and his
  employer Elcomsoft appeared briefly in court today regarding charges
  of providing electronic book format conversion software in the United
  States.

  At the hearing -- described as "pretty routine" by defense attorney
  Joseph Burton -- the case was continued to 9:00 AM on September 24,
  2001, in the same San Jose Federal court building. The case was
  continued so that Elcomsoft will have sufficient time to choose their
  legal representation and so that both prosecution and defense teams
  may present a joint schedule for motions and discovery in the case.

  The next court appearance scheduled in the case is 9:00 AM Pacific on
  September 24 before Judge Ronald Whyte in the San Jose Federal Court
  building.

  Background on the Sklyarov case:
    http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCA/US_v_Sklyarov/

  Calendar of protests related to the Sklyarov case:
    http://freesklyarov.org/calendar/

  Sklyarov Defense Fund (not affiliated with EFF):
    http://www.freesklyarov.org/defensefund.html

                                 - end -
    _________________________________________________________________


Music Share-in Festival in Golden Gate Park

 Hosted by Wavy Gravy and John Perry Barlow

  EFF Music Share In
  Saturday, September 8, 2001, 2pm-5pm PT
  Golden Gate Park (corner of Haight & Stanyan)

  Join the Electronic Frontier Foundation and ten Independent bands for
  an afternoon of music supporting artists' rights. All bands performing
  grant permission for their Share - In performances to be recorded and
  shared with friends under EFF's Open Audio License. Tapers are
  encouraged and welcome.

  Ten bands will play in two stage areas in the meadow. Hosting the main
  stage are Wavy Gravy and EFF co-founder John Perry Barlow. Musicians
  performing at the event include singer/songwriter Adrian West, the
  jazzy Alex Buccat Quartet featuring Sanaz, folk/pop band Atticus
  Scout, high-altitude bluegrass string band Hot Buttered Rum, soulful
  solo performer Michael Musika, the political satirists of The Planning
  Commission, Berkeley-based party band Shady Lady, classical Indian
  instrumentalists Srini and Raja, acoustic rock performer Vanessa Lowe,
  and singer/songwriter Wendy Haynes.

  Come with friends and family! Hear great music, feast on Ben and
  Jerry's ice cream and support a great cause. Best of all, It's FREE!
  There will also be booths, t-shirts and CDs. Visit our website at:
    http://www.eff.org/cafe
  for more information or call +1 415-436-9333 x101

                                 - end -
    _________________________________________________________________


Friday, September 7 - International Day of Action Against Video Surveillance

 Join privacy-minded citizens in raising awareness of public video
 surveillance

   Electronic Frontier Foundation ACTION ALERT

   (Issued: Friday, August 31, 2001 / Deadline: Friday, September 7, 2001)

 Introduction:

  On Friday, 7 September 2001, a variety of groups from around the world
  will be collaborating on an international day of autonomous protests
  against the constant, indiscriminate and technologically sophisticated
  video surveillance of public places by both businesses and law
  enforcement agencies, and in favor of the right to privacy, which is a
  fundamental human right. The protests will take the form of short
  skits and plays, the majority of which will take place in front of
  "webcams," so that people all over the world can watch them via the
  Internet.

 What YOU Can Do:

    * If you are concerned about surveillance cameras in your area, and
      would like to get involved in the protests, then see New York's
      Surveillance Camera Players' (SCP) "How to Stage Your Own
      'Surveillance Camera Theater' in 10 Easy-to-Follow Steps!" at:
        http://www.notbored.org/scp-how-to.html

    * To add your group to the confirmed list of activists, email SCP
      at:
        [email protected]

    * Contact your legislators about online privacy issues. For
      information on how to contact your legislators and other
      government officials, see EFF's "Contacting Congress and Other
      Policymakers" guide at:
        http://www.eff.org/congress.html

    * Join EFF! For membership information see:
        http://www.eff.org/support/

 Privacy Campaign:

  This drive to contact the Judiciary bureaucracy about their invasive
  policies is part of a larger campaign to highlight how extensively
  companies and governmental agencies subject us to surveillance and
  share and use personal information online, and what you can do about
  it.

  Check the EFF Privacy Now! Campaign website regularly for additional
  alerts and news:
    http://www.eff.org/privnow/

 Background:

  The proposal reads as follows:

    We propose --

   1. that an international day of action against video surveillance --
      specifically: the constant, indiscriminate and technologically
      sophisticated video surveillance of public places by both
      businesses and and law enforcement agencies -- take place on
      Friday, 7 September 2001;
   2. that people who wish to intensify the struggle to protect and
      strengthen the right to privacy (a fundamental human right) should
      undertake autonomous actions at the local level and in a
      completely de-centralized fashion;
   3. that, if and when possible, at least some of these actions should
      be undertaken in front of webcams that have already been installed
      in public places by private companies that are insensitive or even
      hostile to privacy concerns (in addition to disrupting "business
      as usual" for these companies, the use of webcams will allow the
      entire world to see 7s01 anti-videosurveillance actions as they
      take place);
   4. that all individuals and groups participating in the 7s01 day of
      action keep in touch with at least one of the groups listed below
      and/or each other;
   5. that at least one Web site links to or actually displays images
      from these actions as they take place;
   6. that this proposal should be posted on-line and sent to as many
      people as possible and as soon as possible; and
   7. that this proposal be translated into as many foreign languages as
      possible, but especially French, German, and Italian, for it is in
      France, Belgium, Germany and Italy that the anti-videosurveillance
      struggle is the most visible at the moment.

  List of participating groups:
    http://www.notbored.org/7s01.html

  EFF's action alert:
    http://www.eff.org/alerts/20010831_surveil_cam_alert.html

   Contacts:

    Bill Brown, Surveillance Camera Players
      [email protected]
      +1 212-561-0106
      http://www.surveillancecameraplayers.org/

    Will Doherty, EFF Online Activist / Media Relations
      [email protected]
      +1 415 436 9333 x111

                                 - end -
    _________________________________________________________________


Update: Opt-Out Alert Correction

  Last issue's alert about opting out of credit card-related marketing
  now contains outdated information, because the credit card trade
  association hosting the opt-out number has changed the system's
  options. We reported that one should wait thru the introduction
  message and then press 3. This now does nothing.

 Revised instructions:

  Call the credit agencies' 1-888-567-8688 number to opt out of postal
  and telemarketing (and possibly e-mail) "credit spam".

  When you dial this phone number, you will first be prompted to press 1
  if you're calling about the Internet email with a July 1 deadline, or
  2 if not.

  Press 2. Do NOT
  press 1.

  Then, listen carefully and wait until given the option to press 3 (do
  not press 1 - this will only opt you out for 2 years, while option 3
  will opt you out permanently).

  Thanks to EFFector reader Patrick Woolsey for being the first to
  notify us of the change.

                                 - end -
    _________________________________________________________________


Administrivia

  EFFector is published by:

  The Electronic Frontier Foundation
  454 Shotwell Street
  San Francisco CA 94110-1914 USA
  +1 415 436 9333 (voice)
  +1 415 436 9993 (fax)
    http://www.eff.org/

  Editors:
  Katina Bishop, EFF Education & Offline Activism Director
  Stanton McCandlish, EFF Technical Director/Webmaster
    [email protected]

  To Join EFF online, or make an additional donation, go to:
    http://www.eff.org/support/

  Membership & donation queries: [email protected]
  General EFF, legal, policy or online resources queries: [email protected]

  Reproduction of this publication in electronic media is encouraged.
  Signed articles do not necessarily represent the views of EFF. To
  reproduce signed articles individually, please contact the authors for
  their express permission. Press releases and EFF announcements &
  articles may be reproduced individually at will.

  To subscribe to EFFector via e-mail, send to [email protected] a
  message BODY (not subject) of:
    subscribe effector
  The list server will send you a confirmation code and then add you to
  a subscription list for EFFector (after you return the confirmation
  code; instructions will be in the confirmation e-mail).

  To unsubscribe, send a similar message body to the same address, like
  so:
    unsubscribe effector

  (Please ask [email protected] to manually remove you from the list if
  this does not work for you for some reason.)

  To change your address, send both commands at once, one per line
  (i.e., unsubscribe your old address, and subscribe your new address).

  Back issues are available at:
    http://www.eff.org/effector

  To get the latest issue, send any message to
  [email protected] (or [email protected]), and it will be mailed to
  you automatically. You can also get, via the Web:
    http://www.eff.org/pub/EFF/Newsletters/EFFector/current.html
    _________________________________________________________________