Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                         J. Hakala
Request for Comments: 8458               The National Library of Finland
Obsoletes: 3188                                             October 2018
Category: Informational
ISSN: 2070-1721


    Using National Bibliography Numbers as Uniform Resource Names

Abstract

  National Bibliography Numbers (NBNs) are used by national libraries
  and other organizations in order to identify resources in their
  collections.  NBNs are usually applied to resources that are not
  catered for by established (standard) identifier systems such as
  International Standard Book Number (ISBN).

  A Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespace for NBNs was established in
  2001 in RFC 3188.  Since then, a number of European national
  libraries have implemented URN:NBN-based systems.

  This document replaces RFC 3188 and defines how NBNs can be supported
  within the updated URN framework.  A revised namespace registration
  (version 4) compliant to RFC 8141 is included.

Status of This Memo

  This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
  published for informational purposes.

  This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
  (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
  received public review and has been approved for publication by the
  Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not all documents
  approved by the IESG are candidates for any level of Internet
  Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841.

  Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
  and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8458.











Hakala                        Informational                     [Page 1]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


Copyright Notice

  Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
  document authors.  All rights reserved.

  This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
  Provisions Relating to IETF Documents

  (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
  publication of this document.  Please review these documents
  carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
  to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
  include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
  the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
  described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

  1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
  2.  Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
  3.  Fundamental Namespace and Community Considerations for NBN  .   5
    3.1.  The URN:NBN Namespace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
    3.2.  Community Considerations for NBNs . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
  4.  National Bibliography Number URNs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
    4.1.  Assignment  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
    4.2.  Syntax  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
      4.2.1.  Usage of r-component and q-component  . . . . . . . .  10
      4.2.2.  Usage of f-component  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
    4.3.  Encoding Considerations and Lexical Equivalence . . . . .  10
    4.4.  Resolution and Persistence of NBN-based URNs  . . . . . .  12
    4.5.  Additional Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
  5.  URN Namespace ID (NID) Registration for the National
      Bibliography Number (NBN) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
  6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
  7.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
  8.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
    8.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
    8.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
  Appendix A.  Significant Changes from RFC 3188  . . . . . . . . .  18
  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
  Contributors  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
  Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18









Hakala                        Informational                     [Page 2]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


1.  Introduction

  One of the basic permanent Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) schemes
  (cf. [RFC3986] and [IANA-URI]) is Uniform Resource Name (URN).  URNs
  were originally defined in RFC 2141 [RFC2141].  In 2017, a revision
  was adopted with new definitions and registration procedures
  [RFC8141].  Any traditional identifier, when used within the URN
  system, must have a namespace of its own that is registered with IANA
  [IANA-URN].  National Bibliography Number (NBN) is one such
  namespace, specified in 2001 in RFC 3188 [RFC3188].

  This document describes the syntax and usage of NBN URNs and updates
  the registration of the associated URN namespace.  This document
  additionally describes certain policy assumptions about how national
  libraries and their partner organizations partition, delegate, and
  manage the namespace.  Violation of those assumptions could impact
  the utility of the NBN URN namespace.

  URN:NBNs are in production use in several European countries
  including (in alphabetical order) Austria, Finland, Germany, Hungary,
  Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland.  The URN:NBN
  namespace is collectively managed by these national libraries.  URN:
  NBNs have been applied to diverse content including Web archives,
  digitized materials, research data, and doctoral dissertations.  They
  can be used by national libraries and organizations cooperating with
  them.

  As a part of the initial development of the URN system in the late
  1990s, the IETF URN Working Group agreed that it was important to
  demonstrate that the URN syntax can accommodate existing identifier
  systems.  RFC 2288 [RFC2288] investigated the feasibility of using
  ISBN, ISSN, and SICI (Serial Item and Contribution Identifier) as
  URNs, with positive results; however, it did not formally register
  corresponding URN namespaces.  (For further discussion of how these
  systems have evolved as URNs, see RFC 8254 [RFC8254].)  This was in
  part due to the still-evolving process to formalize criteria for
  namespace definition documents and registration.  The criteria were
  consolidated later in the IETF, first in RFC 2611 [RFC2611], then RFC
  3406 [RFC3406], and now RFC 8141 [RFC8141].

  URN namespaces have been registered for NBN, ISBN, and ISSN in RFCs
  3188 [RFC3188], 3187 [RFC3187], and 3044 [RFC3044], respectively.
  ISBN and ISSN namespaces were made compliant with RFC 8141 [RFC8141]
  in 2017 by publishing revised ISSN [ISSN-namespace] and ISBN
  [ISBN-namespace] namespace registrations.






Hakala                        Informational                     [Page 3]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


  The term "National Bibliography Number" encompasses persistent local
  identifier systems that national libraries and their partner
  organizations use in addition to the more formally (and
  internationally) established identifiers.  These partner
  organizations include universities and their libraries and other
  subsidiaries, other research institutions, plus governmental and
  public organizations.  Some national libraries maintain a significant
  number of these liaison relationships; for instance, the German
  National Library had almost 400 by early 2018 [NBN-Resolving].

  In practice, NBN differs from standard identifier systems such as
  ISBN and ISSN because it is not a single identifier system with
  standard-specified scope and syntax.  Each NBN implementer creates
  its own system with its own syntax and assignment rules.  Each user
  organization is also obliged to keep track of how NBNs are being
  used; however, within the generic framework set in this document,
  local NBN assignment policies may vary considerably.

  Historically, NBNs have been applied in the national bibliographies
  to identify the resources catalogued into them.  Prior to the
  emergence of bibliographic standard identifiers in the early 1970s,
  national libraries assigned NBNs to all catalogued publications.

  Since the late 1990s, the NBN scope has been extended to cover a vast
  range of resources, both originally digital and digitized.  Only a
  small subset of these resources is catalogued in the national
  bibliographies or other bibliographic databases.  Digitized resources
  and their component parts (such as still images in books or journal
  articles) are examples of resources that may get NBNs.

  It is possible to extend the scope of the NBN much further.  The
  National Library of Finland is using them in the Finnish National
  Ontology Service Finto to identify corporate names (see
  <http://finto.fi/cn/en/>).  Using NBNs to identify metadata elements
  provides a stable basis for creation of linked data.

  Simple guidelines for using NBNs as URNs and the original namespace
  registration were published in RFC 3188 [RFC3188].  The RFC at hand
  replaces RFC 3188; sections discussing the methods by which URN:NBNs
  should be resolved have been updated, unused features have been
  eliminated, and the text is compliant with the stipulations of the
  revised URN specification [RFC8141].









Hakala                        Informational                     [Page 4]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


2.  Conventions Used in This Document

  "NBN" refers to any National Bibliography Number identifier system
  used by the national libraries (or equivalent organizations) and
  other institutions, which use these identifiers with national
  libraries' support and permission.

  In this memo, "URN:NBN" is used as a shorthand for "NBN-based URN".

  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
  "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
  "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
  BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
  capitals, as shown here.

3.  Fundamental Namespace and Community Considerations for NBN

3.1.  The URN:NBN Namespace

  NBNs are widely used to identify both hand-held and digital resources
  in the collections of national libraries and other institutions that
  are responsible for preserving the cultural heritage of their
  constituents.  Resources in these collections are usually preserved
  for a long time (i.e., for centuries).  While the preferred methods
  for digital preservation may vary over time and depend on the
  content, the favorite one has been migration.  Whenever necessary, a
  resource in an outdated file format is migrated into a more modern
  file format.  To the extent possible, all old versions of the
  resource are also kept in order to alleviate the negative effects of
  partially successful migrations and the gradual loss of original look
  and feel that may accompany even fully successful migrations.  When
  NBN is used to identify manifestations and there are many of them for
  a single work, local policy can require that each manifestation ought
  to have its own NBN.

  NBNs are typically used to identify objects for which standard
  identifiers such as ISBN are not applicable.  However, NBNs can be
  used for component resources even when the resource as a whole
  qualifies for a standard identifier.  For instance, if a digitized
  book has an ISBN, JPEG image files of its pages might be assigned
  NBNs.  These URN:NBNs can be used as persistent links to the pages.

  The scope of standard identifier systems such as ISBN and ISSN is
  limited; they are applicable only to certain kinds of resources.  One
  of the roles of the NBN is to fill in the gaps left by the standard
  identifiers.  Collectively, these identifiers and NBNs cover all
  resources that national libraries and their partners need to include
  in their collections.



Hakala                        Informational                     [Page 5]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


  Section 4 below, and particularly Section 4.1, present a more
  detailed overview of the structure of the NBN namespace, related
  institutions, and the identifier assignment principles used.

3.2.  Community Considerations for NBNs

  National libraries are the key organizations providing persistent URN
  resolution services for resources identified with NBNs, independent
  of their form.  As coordinators of NBN usage, national libraries have
  allowed other organizations, such as university libraries or
  governmental organizations, to assign NBNs to the resources these
  organizations preserve for the long term.  In such case, the national
  library coordinates the use of NBNs at the national level.  National
  libraries can also provide URN resolution services and technical
  services to other NBN users.  These organizations are expected to
  either establish their own URN resolution services or use the
  technical infrastructure provided by the national library.  URN:NBNs
  are expected to be resolvable and support one or more resolution
  services.

  Although NBNs can be used to identify component resources, the NBN
  namespace does not specify a generic, intrinsic syntax for doing
  that.  However, there are at least two different ways in which
  component resources can be taken into account within the NBN
  namespace.

  The simplest and probably the most common approach is to assign a
  separate NBN for each component resource, such as a file containing a
  digitized page of a book, and make no provisions to make such NBNs
  discernible in a systematic way from others.

  Second, if the stipulations of the URI generic syntax [RFC3986] and
  the Internet media type specification [RFC2046] are met, in
  accordance with the provisions in RFC 8141 [RFC8141], the URN
  f-component can be attached to URN:NBNs in order to indicate the
  desired location within the resource supplied by URN resolution.

  From the library community point of view, it is important that the
  f-component is not a part of the Namespace-Specific String (NSS), and
  therefore f-component attachment does not mean that the relevant
  component part is identified.  Moreover, the resolution process still
  retrieves the entire resource even if there is an f-component.  The
  component part selection is applied by the resolution client (e.g.,
  browser) to the resource returned by the resolution process.  In
  other words, in this latter case the component parts are just logical
  and physical parts of the identified resource whereas in the former
  cases they are independently named entities.




Hakala                        Informational                     [Page 6]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


  Resources identified by NBNs are not always available in the
  Internet.  If one is not, the URN:NBN can resolve to a surrogate such
  as a metadata record describing the identified resource.

  Section 4 below, and particularly Section 4.4, presents a detailed
  overview of the application of the URN:NBN namespace as well as the
  principles of, and systems used for, the resolution of NBN-based
  URNs.

4.  National Bibliography Number URNs

4.1.  Assignment

  National Bibliography Number (NBN) is a generic term referring to a
  group of identifier systems administered by national libraries and
  institutions authorized by them.  The NBN assignment is typically
  performed by the organization hosting the resource.  National
  libraries are committed to permanent preservation of their deposit
  collections.

  Assignment of NBN-based URNs is controlled on a national level by the
  national library (or national libraries, if there is more than one).
  National guidelines can differ, but the identified resources
  themselves are usually persistent.

  Different national URN:NBN assignment policies have resulted in
  varying levels of control of the assignment process.  Manual URN:NBN
  assignment by the library personnel provides the tightest control,
  especially if the URN:NBNs cover only resources catalogued into the
  national bibliography.  In most national libraries, the scope of
  URN:NBN is already much broader than this.  Usage rules can vary
  within one country, from one URN:NBN sub-namespace to the next.

  Each national library uses NBNs independently of other national
  libraries; apart from this document, there are no guidelines that
  specify or control NBN usage.  As such, NBNs are unique only on the
  national level.  When used as URNs, base NBN strings MUST be
  augmented with a controlled prefix, which is the particular nation's
  ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 two-letter country code (referred to as "ISO
  country code" below) [ISO3166-1].  These prefixes guarantee
  uniqueness of the URN:NBNs at the global scale [ISO3166MA].

  National libraries using URN:NBNs usually specify local assignment
  policies for themselves.  Such policy can limit the URN:NBN usage to,
  e.g., the resources stored in the national library's digital
  collections or databases.  Although this specification does not





Hakala                        Informational                     [Page 7]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


  specify principles for URN:NBN assignment policies that can be
  applied, NBNs assigned to short-lived resources should not be made
  URN:NBNs unless such policy can be justified.

  URN:NBN assignment policy can clarify, for instance, the local policy
  concerning identifier assignment to component parts of resources and
  can specify, with sufficient detail, the syntax of local component
  identifiers (if there is one as a discernible part of the NBNs).  The
  policy can also cover any employed extensions to the default NBN
  scope.

  NBNs as such are locally but not globally unique; two national
  libraries can assign the same NBN to different resources.  A prefix,
  based on the ISO country code as described above, guarantees the
  global uniqueness of URN:NBNs.  Once an NBN has been assigned to a
  resource, it MUST be persistent, and therefore URN:NBNs are
  persistent as well.

  A URN:NBN, once it has been generated from a NBN, MUST NOT be reused
  for another resource.

  Users of the URN:NBN namespace MUST ensure that they do not assign
  the same URN:NBN twice.  Different policies can be applied to
  guarantee this.  For instance, NBNs and corresponding URN:NBNs can be
  assigned sequentially by programs in order to avoid human mistakes.
  It is also possible to use printable representations of checksums
  such as SHA-1 [RFC6234] as NBNs.

4.2.  Syntax

  The Namespace-Specific String (NSS) will consist of three parts:

  o  a prefix consisting of an ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code and
     optional sub-namespace code(s) separated by a colon(s);

  o  a hyphen (-) as the delimiting character; and,

  o  an NBN string assigned by the national library or sub-delegated
     authority.












Hakala                        Informational                     [Page 8]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


  The following formal definition uses ABNF [RFC5234].

   nbn-nss     = prefix "-" nbn-string

   prefix      = iso-cc *( ":" subspc )
               ; The entire prefix is case insensitive.

   iso-cc      = 2ALPHA
               ; Alpha-2 country code as assigned by part 1 of ISO 3166
               ; (identifies the national library to which the branch
               ; is delegated).

   subspc      = 1*(ALPHA / DIGIT)
               ; As assigned by the respective national library.

   nbn-string  = path-rootless
               ; The "path-rootless" rule is defined in RFC 3986.
               ; Syntax requirements specified in RFC 8141 MUST be
               ; taken into account.

  A colon SHOULD be used within the prefix only as a delimiting
  character between the ISO 3166-1 country code and sub-namespace
  code(s), which splits the national namespace into smaller parts.

  The structure (if any) of the nbn_string is determined by the
  authority for the prefix.  Whereas the prefix is regarded as case
  insensitive, NBN strings can be case sensitive at the preference of
  the assigning authority; parsers therefore MUST treat these as case
  sensitive, and any case mapping needed to introduce case
  insensitivity is the responsibility of the relevant resolution
  system.

  A hyphen SHOULD be used as the delimiting character between the
  prefix and the NBN string.  Within the NBN string, a hyphen MAY be
  used for separating different sections of the identifier from one
  another.

  All two-letter codes are reserved by the ISO 3166 Maintenance Agency
  for either existing or possible future ISO country codes (or for
  private use).

  Sub-namespace identifiers MUST be registered on the national level by
  the national library that assigned the identifier.  The list of such
  identifiers can be made publicly available via the Web.

  Note that because case mapping for ASCII letters is completely
  reversible and does not lose information, the case used in case-
  insensitive matching is a local matter.  Implementations can convert



Hakala                        Informational                     [Page 9]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


  to lower or upper case as they see fit; they only need to do it
  consistently.

4.2.1.  Usage of r-component and q-component

  URN:NBN resolvers do not currently support the use of either
  r-component or q-component.

  Resolution services based on r-component can be implemented in the
  future when the r-component syntax and semantics have been specified.

4.2.2.  Usage of f-component

  If URN:NBN resolves to the identified resource and the media type of
  the resource supports f-component usage, it can be used to indicate a
  location within the identified resource.  Persistence is achieved if
  the URN:NBN is assigned to one and only one version of a resource,
  such as a PDF/A version of a book.

  The URN:NBN namespace does not impose any restrictions of its own on
  f-component usage.

4.3.  Encoding Considerations and Lexical Equivalence

  Expressing NBNs as URNs is usually straightforward, as normally only
  ASCII characters are used in NBN strings.  If this is not the case,
  non-ASCII characters in NBNs MUST be translated into canonical form
  as specified in RFC 8141.  If a national library uses NBNs that can
  contain percent-encoded characters higher than U+007F, the library
  needs to carefully define the canonical transformation from these
  NBNs into URNs, including normalization forms.

  When an NBN is used as a URN, the NSS MUST consist of three parts:

  o  a prefix, structured as a primary prefix, which is a two-letter
     ISO 3166-1 country code of the library's country, and zero or more
     secondary prefixes that are each indicated by a delimiting colon
     character (:) and a sub-namespace identifier;

  o  a hyphen (-) as a delimiting character; and,

  o  the NBN string.

  Different delimiting characters are not semantically equivalent.

  The syntax and roles of the three parts listed above are described in
  Section 4.2.




Hakala                        Informational                    [Page 10]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


  If there are several national libraries in one country, these
  libraries MUST agree on how to divide the national namespace between
  themselves using this method before the URN:NBN assignment begins in
  any of these libraries.

  A national library MAY also assign URN:NBN sub-namespaces to trusted
  organizations such as universities or government institutions.  The
  sub-namespace MAY be further divided by the partner organization.
  All sub-namespace identifiers used within a country-code-based
  namespace MUST be registered on the national level by the national
  library that assigned the code.  The national register of these codes
  SHOULD be made available online.

  Being part of the prefix, sub-namespace identifier strings are case-
  insensitive.  They MUST NOT contain any colons or hyphens.

  Formally, two URN:NBNs are lexically equivalent if they are octet-
  by-octet equal after the following (conceptional) preprocessing:

  1.  convert all characters in the leading "urn:nbn:" token to a
      single case;

  2.  convert all characters in the prefix (country code and its
      optional sub-divisions) to a single case; and,

  3.  convert all characters embedded in any percent-encodings to a
      single case.

  Models (indicated line break inserted for readability):

     URN:NBN:<ISO 3166 alpha-2 country code>-<assigned NBN string>

     URN:NBN:<ISO 3166 alpha-2 country code>:<sub-namespace code>-\
     <assigned NBN string>

  Examples:

     URN:NBN:fi-fe201003181510

     urn:nbn:ch:bel-9039

     urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-3475

     urn:nbn:hu-3006







Hakala                        Informational                    [Page 11]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


4.4.  Resolution and Persistence of NBN-based URNs

  Eventually, URNs might be resolved with the help of a Global Resolver
  Discovery Service (GRDS), and URN:NBN syntax makes it possible to
  locate the relevant resolver.  Since no GRDS system has been
  installed yet in the Internet, URN:NBNs are embedded in HTTP URIs in
  order to make them actionable in the present Internet.  In these HTTP
  URIs, the authority part must point to the appropriate URN resolution
  service.  For instance, in Finland, the address of the national URN
  resolver is <http://urn.fi>.  Thus, the HTTP URI for the Finnish URN
  in the example above is <http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe201003181510>.

  The country-code-based prefix part of the URN:NBN namespace-specific
  string will provide a hint needed to find the correct resolution
  service for URN:NBNs from the GRDS when it is established.

  There are three interrelated aspects of persistence that need to be
  discussed: persistence of the objects itself, persistence of the
  identifier, and persistence of the URN resolvers.

  NBNs have traditionally been assigned to printed resources, which
  tend to be persistent.  In contrast, digital resources require
  frequent migrations to guarantee accessibility.  Although it is
  impossible to estimate how often migrations are needed, hardware and
  software upgrades take place frequently, and a lifetime exceeding
  10-20 years can be considered as long.

  However, it is a common practice to keep also the original and
  previously migrated versions of resources.  Therefore, even outdated
  versions of resources can be available in digital archives, no matter
  how old or difficult to use they have become.

  If all versions of a resource are kept, a user who requires
  authenticity can retrieve the original version of the resource,
  whereas a user to whom the ease of use is a priority is likely to be
  satisfied with the latest version.  In order to enable the users to
  find the best match, a national library can link all manifestations
  of a resource to each other so as to make a user aware of them.

  Thus, even if specific versions of digital resources are not normally
  persistent, persistent identifiers such as URN:NBNs support
  information architectures that enable persistent access to any
  version of the resource, including ones that can only be utilized by
  using digital archaeology tools such as custom-made applications to
  render the resource.






Hakala                        Informational                    [Page 12]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


  Persistence of URN resolvers themselves is mainly an organizational
  issue that is related to the persistence of organizations maintaining
  them.  As URN:NBN resolution services will be supplied (primarily) by
  the national libraries, these services are likely to be long lived.

4.5.  Additional Considerations

  It is a good idea to apply URN:NBNs (or other persistent identifiers)
  to all resources that have been prioritized in the organization's
  digital preservation plan.

  Assignment of URN:NBNs to resources that are known to not be
  persistent should be considered carefully.  URN:NBNs can, however, be
  applied to resources that have a low-level preservation priority and
  will not be migrated to more modern file formats or preserved via
  emulation.

  If the identified version of a resource has disappeared, the
  resolution process can supply a surrogate if one exists.  A surrogate
  can be, for instance, a more modern digital version of the original
  electronic resource.

5.  URN Namespace ID (NID) Registration for the National Bibliography
   Number (NBN)

  This URN namespace registration describes how National Bibliography
  Numbers (NBNs) can be supported within the URN framework; it uses the
  updated IANA template specified in RFC 8141.

  Namespace Identifier:  NBN
     This namespace ID was formally assigned to the National
     Bibliography Number in October 2001, when the namespace was
     registered officially [RFC3188].  Utilization of URN:NBNs had
     started in demo systems already in 1998.  Since 2001, tens of
     millions of URN:NBNs have been assigned.  The number of users of
     the namespace has grown in two ways: new national libraries have
     started using NBNs, and many national libraries using the system
     have formed new liaisons.

  Version:  4

  Date:  2018-04-09









Hakala                        Informational                    [Page 13]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


  Registrant:
     Name: Juha Hakala
     Affiliation: Senior Adviser, The National Library of Finland
     Email: [email protected]
     Postal: P.O. Box 15, 00014 Helsinki University, Finland
     Web URL: http://www.nationallibrary.fi/

     The National Library of Finland registered the namespace on behalf
     of the Conference of the European National Librarians (CENL) and
     Conference of Directors of National Libraries (CDNL).  The NBN
     namespace is available for free for the national libraries.  They
     can allow other organizations to assign URN:NBNs and use the
     resolution services established by the library for free or for a
     fee.  The fees, if collected, can be based on, e.g., the
     maintenance costs of the system.

  Purpose:  See Section 3 of RFC 8458

  Syntax:  See Section 4.2 of RFC 8458

  Assignment:  See Section 4.1 of RFC 8458

  Security and Privacy:  See Section 7 of RFC 8458

  Interoperability:
     National libraries and their partners usually apply URN:NBNs if a
     standard identifier such as ISBN is not applicable for the
     resource to be identified.  Some overlap with other URN namespaces
     is possible.

     URN:NBNs may contain characters which must be percent-encoded, but
     usually they consist of printable ASCII characters only.

  Resolution:  See Section 4.4 of RFC 8458

  Documentation:  RFC 8458

  Revision Information:
     This version of the URN:NBN namespace registration has been
     updated to use the revised definition of URN syntax from RFC 8141,
     although usage of r-components is not specified yet.  In addition,
     non-ISO 3166 (country code) based NBNs have been deleted due to
     lack of deployment.  The entire NBN prefix is now specified to be
     case insensitive in accordance with established practice.  This
     version also includes numerous clarifications based on actual
     usage of URN:NBNs.





Hakala                        Informational                    [Page 14]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


6.  IANA Considerations

  IANA has updated the existing registration of the formal URN
  namespace, "NBN", using the template given above in Section 5.

7.  Security Considerations

  This document defines means of encoding NBNs as URNs.  A URN
  resolution service for NBN-based URNs is depicted but only at a
  generic level; thus, questions of secure or authenticated resolution
  mechanisms and authentication of users are out of scope of this
  document.

  Although no validation mechanisms are specified on the global level
  (beyond a routine check of those characters that require special
  encoding when employed in URIs), NBNs assigned by any given authority
  can have a well-specified and rich syntax (including, e.g., fixed
  length and checksum).  In such cases, it is possible to validate the
  correctness of NBNs programmatically.

  Issues regarding intellectual property rights associated with objects
  identified by the URN:NBNs are beyond the scope of this document, as
  are questions about rights to the databases that might be used to
  construct resolution services.

  Beyond the generic security considerations laid out in the underlying
  documents listed in the Normative References, no specific security
  threats have been identified for NBN-based URNs.

8.  References

8.1.  Normative References

  [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
             Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

  [RFC3986]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
             Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
             RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3986>.

  [RFC5234]  Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
             Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>.




Hakala                        Informational                    [Page 15]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


  [RFC8141]  Saint-Andre, P. and J. Klensin, "Uniform Resource Names
             (URNs)", RFC 8141, DOI 10.17487/RFC8141, April 2017,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8141>.

  [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
             2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
             May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

8.2.  Informative References

  [IANA-URI] IANA, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Schemes",
             <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes>.

  [IANA-URN] IANA, "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespaces",
             <http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces>.

  [ISBN-namespace]
             Griffiths, S., "Namespace Registration for International
             Standard Book Number (ISBN) ISO 2108:2017",
             <https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/isbn>.

  [ISO3166-1]
             ISO, "Codes for the representation of names of countries
             and their subdivisions -- Part 1: Country codes",
             ISO 3166-1:2013, November 2013,
             <https://www.iso.org/standard/63545.html>.

  [ISO3166MA]
             ISO, "ISO 3166 Country Codes",
             <https://www.iso.org/iso/country_codes.htm>.

  [ISSN-namespace]
             Bequet, G., "Namespace Registration for International
             Standard Serial Number (ISSN) and Linking ISSN (ISSN-L)
             based on ISO 3297:2007", June 2017,
             <https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/issn>.

  [NBN-Resolving]
             Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, "URN:NBN Resolver fuer
             Deutschland und Schweiz: Information ueber Partner
             Institutionen", <https://nbn-resolving.org/institutions>.

  [PERSID]   PersID initiative, 2009-2011, "persid: Building a
             persistent identifier infrastructure",
             <http://www.persid.org>.






Hakala                        Informational                    [Page 16]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


  [RFC2046]  Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
             Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types", RFC 2046,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC2046, November 1996,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2046>.

  [RFC2141]  Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, DOI 10.17487/RFC2141,
             May 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2141>.

  [RFC2288]  Lynch, C., Preston, C., and R. Daniel, "Using Existing
             Bibliographic Identifiers as Uniform Resource Names",
             RFC 2288, DOI 10.17487/RFC2288, February 1998,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2288>.

  [RFC2611]  Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom,
             "URN Namespace Definition Mechanisms", BCP 33, RFC 2611,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC2611, June 1999,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2611>.

  [RFC3044]  Rozenfeld, S., "Using The ISSN (International Serial
             Standard Number) as URN (Uniform Resource Names) within an
             ISSN-URN Namespace", RFC 3044, DOI 10.17487/RFC3044,
             January 2001, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3044>.

  [RFC3187]  Hakala, J. and H. Walravens, "Using International Standard
             Book Numbers as Uniform Resource Names", RFC 3187,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC3187, October 2001,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3187>.

  [RFC3188]  Hakala, J., "Using National Bibliography Numbers as
             Uniform Resource Names", RFC 3188, DOI 10.17487/RFC3188,
             October 2001, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3188>.

  [RFC3406]  Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom,
             "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace Definition
             Mechanisms", RFC 3406, DOI 10.17487/RFC3406, October 2002,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3406>.

  [RFC6234]  Eastlake 3rd, D. and T. Hansen, "US Secure Hash Algorithms
             (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)", RFC 6234,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC6234, May 2011,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6234>.

  [RFC8254]  Klensin, J. and J. Hakala, "Uniform Resource Name (URN)
             Namespace Registration Transition", RFC 8254,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC8254, October 2017,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8254>.





Hakala                        Informational                    [Page 17]

RFC 8458                        NBN URNs                    October 2018


Appendix A.  Significant Changes from RFC 3188

  Numerous clarifications have been made based on a decade of
  experience with RFC 3188.

  NBNs that are not based on ISO 3166 (country codes) have been removed
  due to lack of usage.

  In accordance with established practice, the whole NBN prefix is now
  declared case insensitive.

  The document is based on the new URN syntax specification, RFC 8141.

  Use of query components and fragment components with this namespace
  is now specified in accordance with RFC 8141.

Acknowledgements

  Revision of RFC 3188 started during the project PersID [PERSID].
  Later, the revision was included in the charter of the URNbis Working
  Group and worked on in that group in parallel with what became RFCs
  8141 and 8254.  The author wishes to thank his colleagues in the
  PersID project and the URNbis participants for their support and
  review comments.

  Tommi Jauhiainen has provided feedback on an early draft version of
  this document.  The author wishes to thank Tommi Jauhiainen, Bengt
  Neiss, and Lars Svensson for the comments they have provided to
  various draft versions of this document.

  John Klensin provided significant editorial and advisory support for
  later draft versions of the document.

Contributors

  This document would not have been possible without contributions by
  Alfred Hoenes.

Author's Address

  Juha Hakala
  The National Library of Finland
  P.O. Box 26
  FIN-00014 Helsinki University
  Finland

  Email: [email protected]




Hakala                        Informational                    [Page 18]