Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          S. Kille
Request for Comments: 8284                                     Isode Ltd
Category: Informational                                    November 2017
ISSN: 2070-1721


  Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema for Supporting
 the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) in White Pages

Abstract

  The Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) identifies
  users by use of Jabber IDs (JIDs).  The Lightweight Directory Access
  Protocol (LDAP) enables provision of a white pages service with a
  schema relating to users and support for Internet protocols.  This
  specification defines a schema to enable XMPP JIDs to be associated
  with objects in an LDAP directory so that this information can be
  used with white pages applications.

Status of This Memo

  This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
  published for informational purposes.

  This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
  (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
  received public review and has been approved for publication by the
  Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not all documents
  approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet
  Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841.

  Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
  and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8284.

















Kille                         Informational                     [Page 1]

RFC 8284                  LDAP Schema for XMPP             November 2017


Copyright Notice

  Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
  document authors.  All rights reserved.

  This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
  Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
  (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
  publication of this document.  Please review these documents
  carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
  to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
  include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
  the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
  described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

  1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
  2.  Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
  3.  Schema Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
    3.1.  Object Class  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
    3.2.  Attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
  4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
  5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
  6.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
  Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6

1.  Introduction

  Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) [RFC6120]
  identifies users by use of Jabber IDs (JIDs).  The Lightweight
  Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [RFC4510] enables provision of a
  white pages service with a schema relating to users and support for
  Internet protocols defined in [RFC4519].  This specification defines
  a schema to enable XMPP JIDs to be associated with LDAP directory
  objects so that this information can be used with white pages
  applications.

  The LDAP schema for storing JIDs is defined to enable JIDs to be
  associated with any object stored in the directory.  This is done by
  associating the new JID Attribute with a new Auxiliary Object Class
  called JIDObject.








Kille                         Informational                     [Page 2]

RFC 8284                  LDAP Schema for XMPP             November 2017


2.  Conventions Used in This Document

  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
  "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
  "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
  BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
  capitals, as shown here.

3.  Schema Definition

  This section defines the schema used to store JIDs in the directory.

3.1.  Object Class

  This section defines a new Auxiliary Object Class called JIDObject,
  which MAY be associated with any structural Object Class.  This
  Object Class is used to augment entries for objects that act or may
  act as an XMPP client.  The JID attribute is optional in order to
  enable configuring an object that is allowed to have an associated
  JID but does not currently have one.

       ( 1.3.6.1.1.23.1 NAME 'JIDObject'
       AUXILIARY
       MAY jid )

3.2.  Attribute

  This section defines the JID attribute referenced by the JIDObject
  Auxiliary Object Class.  The syntax of the JID attribute MUST follow
  the rules of [RFC7622].  The JID stored MUST be a bare JID (e.g., a
  JID such as [email protected] representing a human user)
  and not a full JID (e.g., a JID such as
  [email protected]/AABBCC, which represents a specific XMPP
  client used by the human user and is identified by the resource
  AABBCC).  Note that the LDAP directory server is not expected to
  enforce this syntax.  The syntax rules are for LDAP clients setting
  this attribute, noting that human usage is a key target.
  Applications using this attribute should format that string in a
  manner appropriate to the application, and XMPP applications SHOULD
  apply [RFC7622] to the attribute.  The directory service doesn't
  enforce the JID syntax, and values are compared according to the
  matching rules specified in the attribute definition.

  Note that for the convenience of users and administrators as well as
  implementers, the Directory String syntax and the caseIgnoreMatch
  matching rule are chosen to allow entry and matching of values
  according to common rules used within the directory.  As this syntax
  and matching rule differ from [RFC7622], false positives and false



Kille                         Informational                     [Page 3]

RFC 8284                  LDAP Schema for XMPP             November 2017


  negatives can possibly occur.  This is not anticipated to cause
  operational issues (based on implementation experience with similar
  syntax/matching rule mismatches).

        ( 1.3.6.1.1.23.2 NAME 'jid'
           EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
           SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
           SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 )

  1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 refers to the Directory String syntax
  defined in [RFC4517].

4.  IANA Considerations

  The following registrations have been made in the "Lightweight
  Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Parameters" registry
  <https://www.iana.org/assignments/ldap-parameters> in line with
  BCP 64 [RFC4520].

  Object Identifier Registration

  An object identifier has been assigned to support the registrations
  necessary for this specification by an entry in the Internet
  Directory Numbers (iso.org.dod.internet.directory [1.3.6.1.1.])
  registry:

              Decimal: 23
              Name: xmpp
              Description: LDAP schema for XMPP

  Two object identifiers have been assigned:

  'JIDObject' Descriptor Registration

              Name: JIDObject
              Type: O
              OID: 1.3.6.1.1.23.1

  'jid' Descriptor Registration

              Name: jid
              Type: A
              OID: 1.3.6.1.1.23.2








Kille                         Informational                     [Page 4]

RFC 8284                  LDAP Schema for XMPP             November 2017


5.  Security Considerations

  XMPP JIDs are often personal identifiers enabling electronic
  communication and have similar considerations to email addresses.
  This schema enables publishing of this information in LDAP
  directories, which may be corporate or public services.  Care should
  be taken to only publish JID information that is acceptable both to
  be linked to the LDAP object and to be made accessible to all LDAP
  users.  The general LDAP security considerations specified in
  [RFC4510] also apply.

6.  Normative References

  [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
             Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

  [RFC4510]  Zeilenga, K., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
             (LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map", RFC 4510,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC4510, June 2006,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4510>.

  [RFC4517]  Legg, S., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
             (LDAP): Syntaxes and Matching Rules", RFC 4517,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC4517, June 2006,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4517>.

  [RFC4519]  Sciberras, A., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
             (LDAP): Schema for User Applications", RFC 4519,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC4519, June 2006,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4519>.

  [RFC4520]  Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)
             Considerations for the Lightweight Directory Access
             Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 4520, DOI 10.17487/RFC4520,
             June 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4520>.

  [RFC6120]  Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
             Protocol (XMPP): Core", RFC 6120, DOI 10.17487/RFC6120,
             March 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6120>.

  [RFC7622]  Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
             Protocol (XMPP): Address Format", RFC 7622,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC7622, September 2015,
             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7622>.





Kille                         Informational                     [Page 5]

RFC 8284                  LDAP Schema for XMPP             November 2017


  [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
             2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
             May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

Acknowledgements

  Thanks to Alexey Melnikov for suggestions on preparing this document.
  Thanks to Alan Murdock, Yoav Nir, Peter Saint-Andre, and Kurt
  Zeilenga for their review comments.

Author's Address

  Steve Kille
  Isode Ltd
  14 Castle Mews
  Hampton, Middlesex  TW12 2NP
  United Kingdom

  Email: [email protected]
































Kille                         Informational                     [Page 6]