Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                   R. Ravindranath
Request for Comments: 8124                                  G. Salgueiro
Category: Standards Track                                          Cisco
ISSN: 2070-1721                                               March 2017


                The Session Description Protocol (SDP)
                  WebSocket Connection URI Attribute

Abstract

  The WebSocket protocol enables bidirectional real-time communication
  between clients and servers in web-based applications.  This document
  specifies extensions to Session Description Protocol (SDP) for
  application protocols using WebSocket as a transport.

Status of This Memo

  This is an Internet Standards Track document.

  This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
  (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
  received public review and has been approved for publication by the
  Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
  Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.

  Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
  and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
  http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8124.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
  document authors.  All rights reserved.

  This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
  Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
  (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
  publication of this document.  Please review these documents
  carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
  to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
  include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
  the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
  described in the Simplified BSD License.







Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 1]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017


Table of Contents

  1. Introduction ....................................................2
  2. Terminology .....................................................3
  3. SDP Considerations ..............................................3
     3.1. General ....................................................3
     3.2. "websocket-uri" SDP Attribute ..............................4
     3.3. "websocket-uri" Multiplexing Considerations ................4
  4. SDP Offer/Answer Procedures .....................................5
     4.1. General ....................................................5
     4.2. Generating the Initial Offer ...............................5
     4.3. Generating the Answer ......................................6
     4.4. Offerer Processing of the Answer ...........................7
     4.5. Modifying the Session ......................................7
     4.6. Offerless INVITE Scenarios .................................8
  5. Procedures at WebSocket Client ..................................8
  6. Security Considerations .........................................9
  7. IANA Considerations .............................................9
     7.1. Registration of the "websocket-uri" SDP Media Attribute ....9
  8. References .....................................................10
     8.1. Normative References ......................................10
     8.2. Informative References ....................................10
  Acknowledgements ..................................................12
  Authors' Addresses ................................................12

1.  Introduction

  The WebSocket protocol [RFC6455] enables bidirectional message
  exchange between clients and servers on top of a persistent TCP
  connection (optionally secured with Transport Layer Security (TLS)
  [RFC5246]).  The initial protocol handshake makes use of Hypertext
  Transfer Protocol (HTTP) [RFC7230] semantics, allowing the WebSocket
  protocol to reuse existing HTTP infrastructure.

  Modern web browsers include a WebSocket client stack compliant with
  the WebSocket API [WS-API] as specified by the W3C.  It is expected
  that other client applications (e.g., those running on personal
  computers, mobile devices, etc.) will also make a WebSocket client
  stack available.  Several specifications have been written that
  define how different applications can use a WebSocket subprotocol as
  a reliable transport mechanism.










Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017


  For example, [RFC7118] defines a WebSocket subprotocol as a reliable
  transport mechanism between Session Initiation Protocol
  (SIP)[RFC3261] entities to enable use of SIP in web-oriented
  deployments.  Additionally, [RFC7977] defines a new WebSocket
  subprotocol as a reliable transport mechanism between Message Session
  Relay Protocol (MSRP) clients and relays.  [RFC7395] defines a
  WebSocket subprotocol for the Extensible Messaging and Presence
  Protocol (XMPP).  Similarly, [BFCP-WEBSOCKET] defines a WebSocket
  subprotocol as a reliable transport mechanism between Binary Floor
  Control Protocol (BFCP) [BFCP] entities to enable usage of BFCP in
  new scenarios.

  When a WebSocket subprotocol is used as a transport mechanism between
  a server and client, there needs to be a way to indicate the
  connection URI from the server to the WebSocket client.  For
  applications that use Session Description Protocol (SDP) [RFC4566] to
  negotiate, the connection URI can be indicated by means of an SDP
  attribute.  This specification defines new SDP attributes to indicate
  the connection URI for the WebSocket client.  Applications that use
  SDP for negotiation and WebSocket as a transport protocol can use
  this specification to advertise the WebSocket client connection URI.

2.  Terminology

  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
  "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
  "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
  [RFC2119].

3.  SDP Considerations

3.1.  General

  Applications that use the SDP Offer/Answer mechanism [RFC3264] for
  negotiating media and also use WebSocket or secure WebSocket as a
  transport protocol MAY indicate the connection URI for the WebSocket
  client via a new SDP "a=" media-level attribute defined in
  Section 3.2.













Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 3]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017


3.2.  "websocket-uri" SDP Attribute

  This section defines a new SDP media-level attribute, "websocket-
  uri", which can appear in any of the media sections.

  Example:

     a=websocket-uri:wss://example.com/chat

  Where "wss://example.com/chat" is the ws-URI defined in Section 3 of
  [RFC6455].

  When the "websocket-uri" attribute is present in the media section of
  the SDP, the IP address in "c=" line SHALL be ignored and the full
  URI SHALL be used instead to open the WebSocket connection.  The
  clients MUST ensure that they use the URI to open the WebSocket
  connection and ignore the IP address in the "c=" line and the port in
  the "m=" line.

3.3.  "websocket-uri" Multiplexing Considerations

  Multiplexing characteristics of SDP attributes are described in
  [SDP-MUX].  Various SDP attribute multiplexing categories are
  introduced there.

  o  The multiplexing category of the "a=websocket-uri" attribute is
     CAUTION.

  There are no multiplexing rules specified for the "websocket-uri" SDP
  media-level attribute.  Additionally, the specification of
  multiplexing rules for the "websocket-uri" attribute is outside the
  scope of this document.

  While it is technically possible to bundle WebSocket, there are a
  variety of reasons that make it impractical; thus, it is considered
  unlikely to be used in practice.  Therefore, the "websocket-uri" SDP
  media-level attribute defined in Section 3.2 for using WebSocket as a
  transport protocol is not likely to be used with SDP bundle and is
  consequently categorized as CAUTION for multiplexing.

  If future extensions define how to bundle WebSocket, then
  multiplexing rules for the "a=websocket-uri" attribute need to be
  defined as well, for instance, in an extension of this SDP based
  WebSocket negotiation specification.







Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 4]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017


4.  SDP Offer/Answer Procedures

4.1.  General

  An endpoint (i.e., both the offerer and the answerer) that wishes to
  negotiate WebSocket as transport protocol MUST indicate that it
  wishes to use WebSocket or secure WebSocket in the "proto" field of
  the "m=" line.  Furthermore, the server side, which could be either
  the offerer or answerer, MUST add an "a=websocket-uri" attribute in
  the media section whose value can be either "ws-URI" or "wss-URI", as
  defined in Section 3 of [RFC6455], depending on whether it wishes to
  use WebSocket or secure WebSocket.  This new attribute MUST follow
  the syntax defined in Section 3.  The procedures in this section
  apply to an "m=" line associated with any media stream that uses
  WebSocket or secure WebSocket as transport.

  Both offerer or answerer can initiate a WebSocket connection.  It is
  expected that, based on the topology (for example, if the client is
  behind NAT and server is on global IP address), the offerer and
  answerer applications decide on who will initiate the WebSocket
  connection and appropriately set the "setup" attribute in SDP
  following the procedures of [RFC4145].

4.2.  Generating the Initial Offer

  In order to negotiate WebSocket as a transport, an SDP offerer MUST
  indicate that it wishes to use it in the "proto" field of the "m="
  line.  For example, to negotiate BFCP-over-WebSocket, the "proto"
  value in the "m=" line is TCP/WSS/BFCP if WebSocket is over TLS;
  else, it is TCP/WS/BFCP, as specified in [BFCP-WEBSOCKET].

  The offerer SHOULD assign the SDP "setup" attribute with a value of
  "active" (the offerer will be the initiator of the outgoing TCP
  connection) or "passive" if the offerer wishes to be a receiver of an
  incoming connection.  The offerer MUST NOT assign an SDP "setup"
  attribute with a "holdconn" value.  The offerer MUST follow the
  procedures described in [RFC4145]  while using the "setup" attribute.
  If the "setup" attribute has a value of "passive", it MUST have a URI
  in the "a=websocket-uri" attribute.












Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 5]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017


  The following is an example of an "m=" line for a BFCP connection:

  Offer (browser):
  m=application 9 TCP/WSS/BFCP *
  a=setup:active
  a=connection:new
  a=floorctrl:c-only
  m=audio 55000 RTP/AVP 0
  m=video 55002 RTP/AVP 31

  In the above example, the client is intending to set up the TLS/TCP
  connection; hence, the port is set to a value of 9, which is the
  discard port.

4.3.  Generating the Answer

  If the answerer accepts the offered WebSocket transport connection,
  in the associated SDP answer, the answerer MUST assign an SDP "setup"
  attribute with a value of either "active" or "passive", according to
  the procedures in [RFC4145].  The answerer MUST NOT assign an SDP
  "setup" attribute with a value of "holdconn".

  If the answerer assigns an SDP "setup" attribute with a value of
  "active", the answerer MUST initiate the WebSocket connection
  handshake by acting as client on the negotiated media stream, towards
  the URI specified in the "a=websocket-uri" SDP attribute using the
  procedures described in Section 4 of [RFC6455].

  If the answerer assigns an SDP "setup" attribute with a value of
  "passive", then it MUST have a value of "ws-URI" or "wss-URI", as
  defined in Section 3 of [RFC6455] in an "a=websocket-uri" SDP
  attribute, depending on whether the application uses WebSocket or
  secure WebSocket.  This attribute MUST follow the syntax defined in
  Section 3.

















Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 6]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017


  The following example shows a case where the server responds with a
  BFCP media stream over a WebSocket connection running TLS.  It shows
  an answer "m=" line for the BFCP connection.  In this example, since
  WebSocket is running over TLS, the server answers back with an
  "a=websocket-uri" attribute in the media section of SDP having a
  "wss-URI" connection URI:

  Answer (server):
  m=application 50000 TCP/WSS/BFCP *
  a=setup:passive
  a=connection:new
  a=websocket-uri:wss://bfcp-ws.example.com?token=3170449312
  a=floorctrl:s-only
  a=confid:4321
  a=userid:1234
  a=floorid:1 m-stream:10
  a=floorid:2 m-stream:11
  m=audio 50002 RTP/AVP 0
  a=label:10
  m=video 50004 RTP/AVP 31
  a=label:11

4.4.  Offerer Processing of the Answer

  When the offerer receives an SDP answer, if the offerer ends up
  initiating the TCP connection, then it MUST follow the procedures in
  Section 5.

4.5.  Modifying the Session

  Once an offer/answer exchange has been completed, either endpoint MAY
  send a new offer in order to modify the session.  The endpoints can
  reuse the existing WebSocket connection by adding an
  "a=connection:existing" attribute in the media section of the SDP
  following the rules mentioned in [RFC4145], if the "websocket-uri"
  SDP value and the transport parameters indicated by each endpoint are
  unchanged.  Otherwise, following the rules for the initial offer/
  answer exchange, the endpoints can negotiate and create a new
  WebSocket connection on top of TLS/TCP or TCP.












Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 7]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017


4.6.  Offerless INVITE Scenarios

  In some scenarios, an endpoint (e.g., a browser) originating the call
  (a User Agent Client or UAC) can send an offerless INVITE to the
  server.  The server will generate an offer in response to the INVITE.
  In such cases, the server MUST send an offer with the "setup"
  attribute with a value of "passive" so as to accept incoming
  connection and MUST include an "a=websocket-uri" attribute in the
  media section whose value MUST be either "ws-URI" or "wss-URI",
  depending on whether the server wishes to use WebSocket or secure
  WebSocket.  The SDP offer sent by the server will look like the
  example in Section 4.3.

5.  Procedures at WebSocket Client

  The WebSocket client MUST always initiate the outgoing TCP
  connection; hence, the SDP "setup" attribute MUST always be "active"
  for the WebSocket client in its SDP offer/answer.  In the example
  below, the WebSocket client is the offerer; hence, it assigns a
  "setup" attribute with a value of "active".

  The WebSocket server is a server on the Internet; hence, it MUST
  always assign an SDP "setup" attribute with a value of "passive".
  This also avoids the need to use Interactive Connectivity
  Establishment (ICE) between WebSocket client and WebSocket server, as
  the connection model here would be a typical client-to-server web
  connection.

  Once the offer/answer is complete, the client MUST initiate the
  WebSocket connection handshake by sending a GET message on the
  negotiated media stream, towards the URI specified in an
  "a=websocket-uri" attribute, as per the procedures described in
  [RFC6455].  When no port is passed in the "a=websocket-uri"
  attribute, the default port (80 or 443) is used depending on whether
  the value was "ws-URI" or "wss-URI".
















Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 8]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017


6.  Security Considerations

  An attacker may attempt to add, modify, or remove an
  "a=websocket-uri" attribute from a session description.  This could
  result in an application behaving undesirably.  Consequently, it is
  RECOMMENDED that integrity protection be applied to the SDP session
  descriptions.  For session descriptions carried in SIP [RFC3261],
  S/MIME is available to provide such end-to-end integrity protection.

  As described in Section 10 of [RFC6455], application signalling
  traffic being transported over WebSocket MUST support secure
  WebSocket and SHOULD employ it when communicating with their peers.

  The WebSocket clients have to initiate the TCP connection to the
  WebSocket server identified by the Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN)
  in an "a=websocket-uri" attribute.  Further, as with any other web
  connection, the clients will verify the server's certificate.  The
  WebSocket client MUST follow the procedures in [RFC7525] (including
  host name verification as per Section 6.1 in [RFC7525]) while setting
  up a TLS connection with a WebSocket server.

7.  IANA Considerations

7.1.  Registration of the "websocket-uri" SDP Media Attribute

  This document defines a new SDP media-level attribute "websocket-uri"
  in Section 3.2; IANA has registered the following SDP att-field under
  the "Session Description Protocol (SDP) Parameters" registry as
  follows:

  +---------------------+---------------------------------------------+
  | Attribute name:     | websocket-uri                               |
  | Long-form attribute | WebSocket Connection URI                    |
  | name:               |                                             |
  | Type of attribute:  | media                                       |
  | Mux category:       | CAUTION                                     |
  | Charset Dependent:  | No                                          |
  | Purpose:            | The "websocket-uri" attribute is intended   |
  |                     | to be used as a connection URI for opening  |
  |                     | the WebSocket connection.                   |
  | Appropriate values: | A ws-URI  or wss-URI, as defined in Section |
  |                     | 3 of [RFC6455]                              |
  | Contact name:       | Gonzalo Salgueiro                           |
  | Contact email:      | [email protected]                          |
  | Reference:          | RFC 8124                                    |
  +---------------------+---------------------------------------------+





Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 9]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017


8.  References

8.1.  Normative References

  [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
             Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
             <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

  [RFC4145]  Yon, D. and G. Camarillo, "TCP-Based Media Transport in
             the Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 4145,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC4145, September 2005,
             <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4145>.

  [RFC6455]  Fette, I. and A. Melnikov, "The WebSocket Protocol",
             RFC 6455, DOI 10.17487/RFC6455, December 2011,
             <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6455>.

8.2.  Informative References

  [BFCP]     Camarillo, G., Drage, K., Kristensen, T., Ott, J., and C.
             Eckel, "The Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)", Work in
             Progress, draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-16, November 2015.

  [BFCP-WEBSOCKET]
             Pascual, V., Roman, A., Cazeaux, S., Salgueiro, G., and R.
             R, "The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the Binary
             Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)", Work in Progress,
             draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-15, February 2017.

  [RFC3261]  Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston,
             A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E.
             Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC3261, June 2002,
             <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3261>.

  [RFC3264]  Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer Model
             with Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 3264,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC3264, June 2002,
             <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3264>.

  [RFC4566]  Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session
             Description Protocol", RFC 4566, DOI 10.17487/RFC4566,
             July 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4566>.







Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                   [Page 10]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017


  [RFC5246]  Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
             (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008,
             <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>.

  [RFC7118]  Baz Castillo, I., Millan Villegas, J., and V. Pascual,
             "The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the Session
             Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC 7118,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC7118, January 2014,
             <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7118>.

  [RFC7230]  Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer
             Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing",
             RFC 7230, DOI 10.17487/RFC7230, June 2014,
             <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7230>.

  [RFC7395]  Stout, L., Ed., Moffitt, J., and E. Cestari, "An
             Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)
             Subprotocol for WebSocket", RFC 7395,
             DOI 10.17487/RFC7395, October 2014,
             <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7395>.

  [RFC7525]  Sheffer, Y., Holz, R., and P. Saint-Andre,
             "Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer
             Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security
             (DTLS)", BCP 195, RFC 7525, DOI 10.17487/RFC7525, May
             2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7525>.

  [RFC7977]  Dunkley, P., Llewellyn, G., Pascual, V., Salgueiro, G.,
             and R. Ravindranath, "The WebSocket Protocol as a
             Transport for the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP)",
             RFC 7977, DOI 10.17487/RFC7977, September 2016,
             <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7977>.

  [SDP-MUX]  Nandakumar, S., "A Framework for SDP Attributes when
             Multiplexing", Work in Progress, draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-
             mux-attributes-16, December 2016.

  [WS-API]   Hickson, I., Ed., "The WebSocket API", W3C
             Candidate Recommendation, September 2012,
             <https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-websockets-20120920/>.










Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                   [Page 11]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017


Acknowledgements

  Thanks to Christer Holmberg for raising the need for a BFCP-
  independent SDP attribute for WebSocket Connection URI.

  The authors wish to acknowledge Paul Kyzivat, Suhas Nandakumar,
  Christer Holmberg, Charles Eckel, Dan Wing, Alissa Cooper, and Joel
  Halpern for their invaluable suggestions and review comments.

  Thanks to Mirja Kuehlewind, Alexey Melnikov, Ben Campbell, and
  Kathleen Moriarty for their comments and feedback during IESG
  reviews.

Authors' Addresses

  Ram Mohan Ravindranath
  Cisco Systems, Inc.
  Cessna Business Park,
  Kadabeesanahalli Village, Varthur Hobli,
  Sarjapur-Marathahalli Outer Ring Road
  Bangalore, Karnataka  560103
  India

  Email: [email protected]


  Gonzalo Salgueiro
  Cisco Systems, Inc.
  7200-12 Kit Creek Road
  Research Triangle Park, NC  27709
  United States of America

  Email: [email protected]


















Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                   [Page 12]