Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) J. Hui

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) J. Hui
Request for Comments: 7731 Nest Labs
Category: Standards Track R. Kelsey
ISSN: 2070-1721 Silicon Labs
February 2016

Multicast Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (MPL)

Abstract

This document specifies the Multicast Protocol for Low-Power and
Lossy Networks (MPL), which provides IPv6 multicast forwarding in
constrained networks. MPL avoids the need to construct or maintain
any multicast forwarding topology, disseminating messages to all MPL
Forwarders in an MPL Domain.

MPL has two modes of operation. One mode uses the Trickle algorithm
to manage control-plane and data-plane message transmissions and is
applicable for deployments with few multicast sources. The other
mode uses classic flooding. By providing both modes and
parameterization of the Trickle algorithm, an MPL implementation can
be used in a variety of multicast deployments and can trade between
dissemination latency and transmission efficiency.

Status of This Memo

This is an Internet Standards Track document.

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7731.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 1]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 2]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

Table of Contents

1. Introduction ....................................................4
2. Terminology .....................................................5
3. Applicability Statement .........................................6
4. MPL Protocol Overview ...........................................7
4.1. MPL Domains ................................................7
4.2. Information Base Overview ..................................8
4.3. Protocol Overview ..........................................8
4.4. Signaling Overview ........................................10
5. MPL Parameters and Constants ...................................11
5.1. MPL Multicast Addresses ...................................11
5.2. MPL Message Types .........................................11
5.3. MPL Seed Identifiers ......................................11
5.4. MPL Parameters ............................................11
6. Protocol Message Formats .......................................14
6.1. MPL Option ................................................14
6.2. MPL Control Message .......................................15
6.3. MPL Seed Info .............................................16
7. Information Base ...............................................17
7.1. Local Interface Set .......................................17
7.2. Domain Set ................................................18
7.3. Seed Set ..................................................18
7.4. Buffered Message Set ......................................18
8. MPL Seed Sequence Numbers ......................................19
9. MPL Data Messages ..............................................19
9.1. MPL Data Message Generation ...............................19
9.2. MPL Data Message Transmission .............................20
9.3. MPL Data Message Processing ...............................21
10. MPL Control Messages ..........................................22
10.1. MPL Control Message Generation ...........................22
10.2. MPL Control Message Transmission .........................22
10.3. MPL Control Message Processing ...........................23
11. IANA Considerations ...........................................24
11.1. MPL Option Type ..........................................24
11.2. MPL ICMPv6 Type ..........................................25
11.3. Well-Known Multicast Addresses ...........................25
12. Security Considerations .......................................25
13. References ....................................................26
13.1. Normative References .....................................26
13.2. Informative References ...................................28
Acknowledgements ..................................................29
Authors' Addresses ................................................29

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 3]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

1. Introduction

Low-Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs) typically operate with strict
resource constraints in communication, computation, memory, and
energy. Such resource constraints may preclude the use of existing
IPv6 multicast routing and forwarding mechanisms. Traditional IP
multicast delivery typically relies on topology maintenance
mechanisms to discover and maintain routes to all subscribers of a
multicast group (e.g., [RFC3973] [RFC4601]). However, maintaining
such topologies in LLNs is costly and may not be feasible given the
available resources.

Memory constraints may limit devices to maintaining links/routes to
one or a few neighbors. For this reason, the Routing Protocol for
LLNs (RPL) specifies both storing and non-storing modes [RFC6550].
The latter allows RPL routers to maintain only one or a few default
routes towards an LLN Border Router (LBR) and use source routing to
forward messages away from the LBR. For the same reasons, an LLN
device may not be able to maintain a multicast routing topology when
operating with limited memory.

Furthermore, the dynamic properties of wireless networks can make the
cost of maintaining a multicast routing topology prohibitively
expensive. In wireless environments, topology maintenance may
involve selecting a connected dominating set used to forward
multicast messages to all nodes in an administrative domain.
However, existing mechanisms often require two-hop topology
information, and the cost of maintaining such information grows
polynomially with network density.

This document specifies the Multicast Protocol for Low-Power and
Lossy Networks (MPL), which provides IPv6 multicast forwarding in
constrained networks. MPL avoids the need to construct or maintain
any multicast routing topology, disseminating multicast messages to
all MPL Forwarders in an MPL Domain. By using the Trickle algorithm
[RFC6206], MPL requires only small, constant state for each MPL
device that initiates disseminations. The Trickle algorithm also
allows MPL to be density aware, allowing the communication rate to
scale logarithmically with density.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 4]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

2. Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
[RFC2119].

The following terms are used throughout this document:

MPL Forwarder - A router that implements MPL. An MPL Forwarder is
equipped with at least one MPL Interface.

MPL Interface - An MPL Forwarder's attachment to a communications
medium, over which it transmits and receives MPL Data Messages and
MPL Control Messages according to this specification. An MPL
Interface is assigned one or more unicast addresses and is
subscribed to one or more MPL Domain Addresses.

MPL Domain Address - A multicast address that identifies the set of
MPL Interfaces within an MPL Domain. MPL Data Messages
disseminated in an MPL Domain have the associated MPL Domain
Address as their destination address.

MPL Domain - A scope zone, as defined in [RFC4007], in which MPL
Interfaces subscribe to the same MPL Domain Address and
participate in disseminating MPL Data Messages.

MPL Data Message - A multicast message that is used to communicate a
multicast payload between MPL Forwarders within an MPL Domain. An
MPL Data Message contains an MPL Option in the IPv6 header and has
as its destination address the MPL Domain Address corresponding to
the MPL Domain.

MPL Control Message - A link-local multicast message that is used to
communicate information about recently received MPL Data Messages
to neighboring MPL Forwarders.

MPL Seed - An MPL Forwarder that generates MPL Data Messages and
serves as an entry point into an MPL Domain.

MPL Seed Identifier - An unsigned integer that uniquely identifies
an MPL Seed within an MPL Domain.

Node - Used within this document to refer to an MPL Forwarder.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 5]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

3. Applicability Statement

MPL is an IPv6 multicast forwarding protocol designed for the
communication characteristics and resource constraints of LLNs. By
implementing controlled disseminations of multicast messages using
the Trickle algorithm, MPL is designed for networks that communicate
using low-power and lossy links with widely varying topologies in
both the space and time dimensions.

While designed specifically for LLNs, MPL is not limited to use over
such networks. MPL may be applicable to any network where no
multicast routing state is desired. MPL may also be used in
environments where only a subset of links are considered low-power
and lossy links.

A host need not be aware that their multicast is supported by MPL as
long as its attachment router forwards multicast messages between the
MPL Domain and the host. However, a host may choose to implement MPL
so that it can take advantage of the broadcast medium inherent in
many LLNs and receive multicast messages carried by MPL directly.

MPL is parameterized to support different dissemination techniques.
In one parameterization, MPL may utilize the classic flooding method
that involves having each device receiving a message rebroadcast the
message. In another parameterization, MPL may utilize Trickle's
[RFC6206] "polite gossip" method, which involves transmission
suppression and adaptive timing techniques. [Clausen2013] questions
the efficiency of Trickle's "polite gossip" mechanism in some
multicast scenarios, so by also including a classic flooding mode of
operation MPL aims to be able to perform satisfactorily in a variety
of situations.

To support efficient message delivery in networks that have many poor
links, MPL supports a reactive forwarding mode that utilizes MPL
Control Messages to summarize the current multicast state. The MPL
Control Message size grows linearly with the number of simultaneous
MPL Seeds in the MPL Domain -- 4 octets per MPL Seed. When reactive
forwarding is not enabled, MPL Control Messages are not transmitted,
and the associated overhead is not incurred.

This document does not specify a cryptographic security mechanism for
MPL to ensure that MPL messages are not spoofed by anyone with access
to the LLN. In general, the basic ability to inject messages into an
LLN may be used as a denial-of-service attack, regardless of what
forwarding protocol is used. For these reasons, LLNs typically
employ link-layer security mechanisms to mitigate an attacker's
ability to inject messages. For example, the IEEE 802.15.4
[IEEE802.15.4] standard specifies frame security mechanisms using

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 6]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

AES-128 to support access control, message integrity, message
confidentiality, and replay protection. However, if the attack
vector includes attackers that have access to the LLN, then MPL
SHOULD NOT be used.

4. MPL Protocol Overview

The goal of MPL is to deliver multicast messages to all interfaces
that subscribe to the multicast messages' destination address within
an MPL Domain.

4.1. MPL Domains

An MPL Domain is a scope zone, as defined in [RFC4007], in which MPL
Interfaces subscribe to the same MPL Domain Address and participate
in disseminating MPL Data Messages.

When participating in only one MPL Domain, the MPL Domain Address is
the ALL_MPL_FORWARDERS multicast address with Realm-Local scope
("scop" value 3) [RFC7346].

When an MPL Forwarder participates in multiple MPL Domains
simultaneously, at most one MPL Domain may be assigned an MPL Domain
Address equal to the ALL_MPL_FORWARDERS multicast address. All other
MPL Domains MUST be assigned a unique MPL Domain Address that allows
the MPL Forwarder to identify each MPL Domain. The MPL Domains
SHOULD be configured automatically based on some underlying topology.
For example, when using RPL [RFC6550], MPL Domains may be configured
based on RPL Instances.

When MPL is used in deployments that use administratively defined
scopes that cover, for example, multiple subnets based on different
underlying network technologies, Admin-Local scope (scop value 4) or
Site-Local scope (scop value 5) SHOULD be used.

An MPL Forwarder MAY participate in additional MPL Domains identified
by other multicast addresses. An MPL Interface MUST subscribe to the
MPL Domain Addresses for the MPL Domains that it participates in.
The assignment of other multicast addresses is out of scope.

For each MPL Domain Address that an MPL Interface subscribes to, the
MPL Interface MUST also subscribe to the same MPL Domain Address with
Link-Local scope (scop value 2) when reactive forwarding is in use
(i.e., when communicating MPL Control Messages).

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 7]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

4.2. Information Base Overview

A node records necessary protocol state in the following
information sets:

o The Local Interface Set records the set of local MPL Interfaces
and the unicast addresses assigned to those MPL Interfaces.

o The Domain Set records the set of MPL Domain Addresses and the
local MPL Interfaces that subscribe to those addresses.

o A Seed Set records information about received MPL Data Messages
received from an MPL Seed within an MPL Domain. Each MPL Domain
has an associated Seed Set. A Seed Set maintains the minimum
sequence number for MPL Data Messages that the MPL Forwarder is
willing to receive or has buffered in its Buffered Message Set
from an MPL Seed. MPL uses Seed Sets and Buffered Message Sets to
determine when to accept an MPL Data Message, process its payload,
and retransmit it.

o A Buffered Message Set records recently received MPL Data Messages
from an MPL Seed within an MPL Domain. Each MPL Domain has an
associated Buffered Message Set. MPL Data Messages resident in a
Buffered Message Set have sequence numbers that are greater than
or equal to the minimum threshold maintained in the corresponding
Seed Set. MPL uses Buffered Message Sets to store MPL Data
Messages that may be transmitted by the MPL Forwarder for
forwarding.

4.3. Protocol Overview

MPL achieves its goal by implementing a controlled flood that
attempts to disseminate the multicast data message to all interfaces
within an MPL Domain. MPL performs the following tasks to
disseminate a multicast message:

o When having a multicast message to forward into an MPL Domain, the
MPL Seed generates an MPL Data Message that includes the MPL
Domain Address as the IPv6 Destination Address, the MPL Seed
Identifier, a newly generated sequence number, and the multicast
message. If the multicast destination address is not the MPL
Domain Address, IP-in-IP tunneling [RFC2473] is used to
encapsulate the multicast message in an MPL Data Message,
preserving the original IPv6 Destination Address.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 8]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

o Upon receiving an MPL Data Message, the MPL Forwarder extracts the
MPL Seed and sequence number and determines whether or not the MPL
Data Message was previously received using the MPL Domain's Seed
Set and Buffered Message Set.

* If the sequence number is less than the lower-bound sequence
number maintained in the Seed Set or a message with the same
sequence number exists within the Buffered Message Set, the MPL
Forwarder marks the MPL Data Message as old.

* Otherwise, the MPL Forwarder marks the MPL Data Message as new.

o For each newly received MPL Data Message, an MPL Forwarder updates
the Seed Set, adds the MPL Data Message into the Buffered Message
Set, processes its payload, and multicasts the MPL Data Message a
number of times on all MPL Interfaces participating in the same
MPL Domain to forward the message.

o Each MPL Forwarder may periodically link-local multicast MPL
Control Messages on MPL Interfaces to communicate information
contained in an MPL Domain's Seed Set and Buffered Message Set.

o Upon receiving an MPL Control Message, an MPL Forwarder determines
whether or not there are any new MPL Data Messages that have yet
to be received by the MPL Control Message's source and multicasts
those MPL Data Messages.

MPL's configuration parameters allow two forwarding strategies for
disseminating MPL Data Messages via MPL Interfaces:

Proactive Forwarding - With proactive forwarding, an MPL Forwarder
schedules transmissions of MPL Data Messages using the Trickle
algorithm, without any prior indication that neighboring nodes
have yet to receive the message. After transmitting the MPL Data
Message a limited number of times, the MPL Forwarder may terminate
proactive forwarding for the MPL Data Message.

Reactive Forwarding - With reactive forwarding, an MPL Forwarder
link-local multicasts MPL Control Messages using the Trickle
algorithm [RFC6206]. MPL Forwarders use MPL Control Messages to
discover new MPL Data Messages that have not yet been received.
When discovering that a neighboring MPL Forwarder has not yet
received an MPL Data Message, the MPL Forwarder schedules those
MPL Data Messages for transmission using the Trickle algorithm.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 9]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

Note that, when used within the same MPL Domain, proactive and
reactive forwarding strategies are not mutually exclusive and may be
used simultaneously. For example, upon receiving a new MPL Data
Message when both proactive and reactive forwarding techniques are
enabled, an MPL Forwarder will proactively retransmit the MPL Data
Message a limited number of times and schedule further transmissions
upon receiving MPL Control Messages.

4.4. Signaling Overview

MPL generates and processes the following messages:

MPL Data Message - Generated by an MPL Seed to deliver a multicast
message across an MPL Domain. The MPL Data Message's source is an
address in the Local Interface Set of the MPL Seed that generated
the message and is valid within the MPL Domain. The MPL Data
Message's destination is the MPL Domain Address corresponding to
the MPL Domain. An MPL Data Message contains:

* The Seed Identifier of the MPL Seed that generated the MPL Data
Message.

* The sequence number of the MPL Seed that generated the MPL Data
Message.

* The original multicast message.

MPL Control Message - Generated by an MPL Forwarder to communicate
information contained in an MPL Domain's Seed Set and Buffered
Message Set to neighboring MPL Forwarders. An MPL Control Message
contains a list of tuples for each entry in the Seed Set. Each
tuple contains:

* The minimum sequence number maintained in the Seed Set for the
MPL Seed.

* A bit-vector indicating the sequence numbers of MPL Data
Messages resident in the Buffered Message Set for the MPL Seed,
where the first bit represents a sequence number equal to the
minimum threshold maintained in the Seed Set.

* The length of the bit-vector.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 10]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

5. MPL Parameters and Constants

This section describes various program and networking parameters and
constants used by MPL.

5.1. MPL Multicast Addresses

MPL makes use of MPL Domain Addresses to identify MPL Interfaces of
an MPL Domain. By default, MPL Forwarders subscribe to the
ALL_MPL_FORWARDERS multicast address with Realm-Local scope (scop
value 3) [RFC7346].

For each MPL Domain Address that an MPL Interface subscribes to, the
MPL Interface MUST also subscribe to the MPL Domain Address with
Link-Local scope (scop value 2) when reactive forwarding is in use.
MPL Forwarders use the link-scoped MPL Domain Address to communicate
MPL Control Messages to neighboring (i.e., on-link) MPL Forwarders.

5.2. MPL Message Types

MPL defines an IPv6 Option for carrying an MPL Seed Identifier and a
sequence number within an MPL Data Message. The IPv6 Option Type has
value 0x6D.

MPL defines an ICMPv6 Message (MPL Control Message) for communicating
information contained in an MPL Domain's Seed Set and Buffered
Message Set to neighboring MPL Forwarders. The MPL Control Message
has ICMPv6 Type 159.

5.3. MPL Seed Identifiers

MPL uses MPL Seed Identifiers to uniquely identify MPL Seeds within
an MPL Domain. For each MPL Domain that the MPL Forwarder serves as
an MPL Seed, the MPL Forwarder MUST have an associated MPL Seed
Identifier. An MPL Forwarder MAY use the same MPL Seed Identifier
across multiple MPL Domains, but the MPL Seed Identifier MUST be
unique within each MPL Domain. The mechanism for assigning and
verifying uniqueness of MPL Seed Identifiers is not specified in this
document.

5.4. MPL Parameters

PROACTIVE_FORWARDING - A boolean value that indicates whether or not
the MPL Forwarder schedules MPL Data Message transmissions after
receiving them for the first time. PROACTIVE_FORWARDING has a
default value of TRUE. All MPL Interfaces on the same link SHOULD
be configured with the same value of PROACTIVE_FORWARDING. An
implementation MAY choose to vary the value of

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 11]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

PROACTIVE_FORWARDING across interfaces on the same link if
reactive forwarding is also in use. The mechanism for setting
PROACTIVE_FORWARDING is not specified within this document.

SEED_SET_ENTRY_LIFETIME - The minimum lifetime for an entry in the
Seed Set. SEED_SET_ENTRY_LIFETIME has a default value of
30 minutes. It is RECOMMENDED that all MPL Forwarders use the
same value for SEED_SET_ENTRY_LIFETIME for a given MPL Domain and
use a default value of 30 minutes. Using a value of
SEED_SET_ENTRY_LIFETIME that is too small can cause the duplicate
detection mechanism to fail, resulting in an MPL Forwarder
receiving a given MPL Data Message more than once. The mechanism
for setting SEED_SET_ENTRY_LIFETIME is not specified within this
document.

As specified in [RFC6206], a Trickle timer runs for a defined
interval and has three configuration parameters: the minimum interval
size Imin, the maximum interval size Imax, and a redundancy
constant k.

This specification defines a fourth Trickle configuration parameter,
TimerExpirations, which indicates the number of Trickle timer
expiration events that occur before terminating the Trickle algorithm
for a given MPL Data Message or MPL Control Message.

Each MPL Interface uses the following Trickle parameters for MPL Data
Message and MPL Control Message transmissions:

DATA_MESSAGE_IMIN - The minimum Trickle timer interval, as defined
in [RFC6206], for MPL Data Message transmissions.
DATA_MESSAGE_IMIN has a default value of 10 times the expected
link-layer latency.

DATA_MESSAGE_IMAX - The maximum Trickle timer interval, as defined
in [RFC6206], for MPL Data Message transmissions.
DATA_MESSAGE_IMAX has a default value equal to DATA_MESSAGE_IMIN.

DATA_MESSAGE_K - The redundancy constant, as defined in [RFC6206],
for MPL Data Message transmissions. DATA_MESSAGE_K has a default
value of 1.

DATA_MESSAGE_TIMER_EXPIRATIONS - The number of Trickle timer
expirations that occur before terminating the Trickle algorithm's
retransmission of a given MPL Data Message.
DATA_MESSAGE_TIMER_EXPIRATIONS has a default value of 3.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 12]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

CONTROL_MESSAGE_IMIN - The minimum Trickle timer interval, as
defined in [RFC6206], for MPL Control Message transmissions.
CONTROL_MESSAGE_IMIN has a default value of 10 times the
worst-case link-layer latency.

CONTROL_MESSAGE_IMAX - The maximum Trickle timer interval, as
defined in [RFC6206], for MPL Control Message transmissions.
CONTROL_MESSAGE_IMAX has a default value of 5 minutes.

CONTROL_MESSAGE_K - The redundancy constant, as defined in
[RFC6206], for MPL Control Message transmissions.
CONTROL_MESSAGE_K has a default value of 1.

CONTROL_MESSAGE_TIMER_EXPIRATIONS - The number of Trickle timer
expirations that occur before terminating the Trickle algorithm
for MPL Control Message transmissions.
CONTROL_MESSAGE_TIMER_EXPIRATIONS has a default value of 10.

As described in [RFC6206], if different nodes have different
configuration parameters, Trickle may have unintended behaviors.
Therefore, it is RECOMMENDED that all MPL Interfaces attached to the
same link of a given MPL Domain use the same values for the Trickle
parameters above for a given MPL Domain. The mechanism for setting
the Trickle parameters is not specified within this document.

The default MPL parameters specify a forwarding strategy that
utilizes both proactive and reactive techniques. Using these default
values, an MPL Forwarder proactively transmits any new MPL Data
Messages it receives and then uses MPL Control Messages to trigger
additional MPL Data Message retransmissions where message drops are
detected. Setting DATA_MESSAGE_IMAX to the same value as
DATA_MESSAGE_IMIN in this case is acceptable, since subsequent MPL
Data Message retransmissions are triggered by MPL Control Messages,
where CONTROL_MESSAGE_IMAX is greater than CONTROL_MESSAGE_IMIN.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 13]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

6. Protocol Message Formats

Messages generated and processed by an MPL Forwarder are described in
this section.

6.1. MPL Option

The MPL Option is carried in MPL Data Messages in an IPv6 Hop-by-Hop
Options header, immediately following the IPv6 header. The MPL
Option has the following format:

0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Option Type | Opt Data Len |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| S |M|V| rsv | sequence | seed-id (optional) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Option Type 0x6D.

Opt Data Len Length of the Option Data field [RFC2460] in octets.

S 2-bit unsigned integer. Identifies the length of the
seed-id. '0' indicates that the seed-id is the IPv6
Source Address and not included in the MPL Option.
'1' indicates that the seed-id is a 16-bit unsigned
integer. '2' indicates that the seed-id is a 64-bit
unsigned integer. '3' indicates that the seed-id is a
128-bit unsigned integer.

M 1-bit flag. '1' indicates that the value in the
sequence field is known to be the largest sequence
number that was received from the MPL Seed.

V 1-bit flag. '0' indicates that the MPL Option
conforms to this specification. MPL Data Messages
with an MPL Option in which this flag is set to 1 MUST
be dropped.

rsv 4-bit reserved field. MUST be set to 0 on
transmission and ignored on reception.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 14]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

sequence 8-bit unsigned integer. Identifies relative ordering
of MPL Data Messages from the MPL Seed identified by
the seed-id.

seed-id Uniquely identifies the MPL Seed that initiated
dissemination of the MPL Data Message. The size of
the seed-id is indicated by the S field.

The Option Data (specifically, the M flag) of the MPL Option is
updated by MPL Forwarders as the MPL Data Message is forwarded.
Nodes that do not understand the MPL Option MUST discard the MPL Data
Message. Thus, according to [RFC2460], the three high-order bits of
the Option Type are set to '011'. The Option Data length is
variable.

The seed-id uniquely identifies an MPL Seed. When the seed-id is
128 bits (S=3), the MPL Seed MAY use an IPv6 address assigned to one
of its interfaces that is unique within the MPL Domain. Managing MPL
Seed Identifiers is not within the scope of this document.

The sequence field establishes a total ordering of MPL Data Messages
generated by an MPL Seed for an MPL Domain. The MPL Seed MUST
increment the sequence field's value on each new MPL Data Message
that it generates for an MPL Domain. Implementations MUST follow the
Serial Number Arithmetic as defined in [RFC1982] when incrementing a
sequence value or comparing two sequence values.

Future updates to this specification may define additional fields
following the seed-id field.

6.2. MPL Control Message

An MPL Forwarder uses ICMPv6 Messages to communicate information
contained in an MPL Domain's Seed Set and Buffered Message Set to
neighboring MPL Forwarders. The MPL Control Message has the
following format:

0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Code | Checksum |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
. MPL Seed Info[0..n] .
. .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 15]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

IP Fields:

Source Address An IPv6 address in the AddressSet of the
corresponding MPL Interface. MUST be valid
within the MPL Domain.

Destination Address The link-scoped MPL Domain Address
corresponding to the MPL Domain.

Hop Limit 255

ICMPv6 Fields:

Type 159

Code 0

Checksum The ICMP checksum. See [RFC4443].

MPL Seed Info[0..n] List of zero or more MPL Seed Info entries.

The MPL Control Message indicates the sequence numbers of MPL Data
Messages that are within the MPL Domain's Buffered Message Set. The
MPL Control Message also indicates the sequence numbers of MPL Data
Messages that an MPL Forwarder is willing to receive. The MPL
Control Message allows neighboring MPL Forwarders to determine
whether or not there are any new MPL Data Messages to exchange.

6.3. MPL Seed Info

The MPL Seed Info encodes the minimum sequence number for an MPL Seed
maintained in the MPL Domain's Seed Set. The MPL Seed Info also
indicates the sequence numbers of MPL Data Messages generated by the
MPL Seed that are stored within the MPL Domain's Buffered Message
Set. The MPL Seed Info has the following format:

0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| min-seqno | bm-len | S | seed-id (0/2/8/16 octets) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
. buffered-mpl-messages (variable length) .
. .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 16]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

min-seqno 8-bit unsigned integer. The lower-bound
sequence number for the MPL Seed.

bm-len 6-bit unsigned integer. The size of
buffered-mpl-messages in octets.

S 2-bit unsigned integer. Identifies the
length of the seed-id. '0' indicates that
the seed-id value is the IPv6 Source Address
and not included in the MPL Seed Info. '1'
indicates that the seed-id value is a 16-bit
unsigned integer. '2' indicates that the
seed-id value is a 64-bit unsigned integer.
'3' indicates that the seed-id is a 128-bit
unsigned integer.

seed-id Variable-length unsigned integer. Indicates
the MPL Seed associated with this MPL
Seed Info.

buffered-mpl-messages Variable-length bit-vector. Identifies the
sequence numbers of MPL Data Messages
maintained in the corresponding Buffered
Message Set for the MPL Seed. The i-th bit
represents a sequence number of min-seqno
+ i. '0' indicates that the corresponding
MPL Data Message does not exist in the
Buffered Message Set. '1' indicates that the
corresponding MPL Data Message does exist in
the Buffered Message Set.

The MPL Seed Info does not have any octet alignment requirement.

7. Information Base

7.1. Local Interface Set

The Local Interface Set records the local MPL Interfaces of an MPL
Forwarder. The Local Interface Set consists of Local Interface
Tuples, one per MPL Interface: (AddressSet).

AddressSet - a set of unicast addresses assigned to the MPL
Interface.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 17]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

7.2. Domain Set

The Domain Set records the MPL Interfaces that subscribe to each MPL
Domain Address. The Domain Set consists of MPL Domain Tuples, one
per MPL Domain: (MPLInterfaceSet).

MPLInterfaceSet - a set of MPL Interfaces that subscribe to the MPL
Domain Address that identifies the MPL Domain.

7.3. Seed Set

A Seed Set records a sliding window used to determine the sequence
numbers of MPL Data Messages (generated by the MPL Seed) that an MPL
Forwarder is willing to accept. An MPL Forwarder maintains a Seed
Set for each MPL Domain that it participates in. A Seed Set consists
of MPL Seed Tuples: (SeedID, MinSequence, Lifetime).

SeedID - the identifier for the MPL Seed.

MinSequence - a lower-bound sequence number that represents the
sequence number of the oldest MPL Data Message the MPL Forwarder
is willing to receive or transmit. An MPL Forwarder MUST ignore
any MPL Data Message that has a sequence value less than
MinSequence.

Lifetime - indicates the minimum remaining lifetime of the Seed Set
entry. An MPL Forwarder MUST NOT free a Seed Set entry before the
remaining lifetime expires.

7.4. Buffered Message Set

A Buffered Message Set records recently received MPL Data Messages
from an MPL Seed within an MPL Domain. An MPL Forwarder uses a
Buffered Message Set to buffer MPL Data Messages while the MPL
Forwarder is forwarding the MPL Data Messages. An MPL Forwarder
maintains a Buffered Message Set for each MPL Domain that it
participates in. A Buffered Message Set consists of Buffered Message
Tuples: (SeedID, SequenceNumber, DataMessage).

SeedID - the identifier for the MPL Seed that generated the MPL Data
Message.

SequenceNumber - the sequence number for the MPL Data Message.

DataMessage - the MPL Data Message.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 18]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

All MPL Data Messages within a Buffered Message Set MUST have a
sequence number greater than or equal to MinSequence for the
corresponding SeedID. When increasing MinSequence for an MPL Seed,
the MPL Forwarder MUST delete any MPL Data Messages from the
corresponding Buffered Message Set that have sequence numbers less
than MinSequence.

8. MPL Seed Sequence Numbers

Each MPL Seed maintains a sequence number for each MPL Domain that it
serves. The sequence numbers are included in MPL Data Messages
generated by the MPL Seed. The MPL Seed MUST increment the sequence
number for each MPL Data Message that it generates for an MPL Domain.
Implementations MUST follow the Serial Number Arithmetic as defined
in [RFC1982] when incrementing a sequence value or comparing two
sequence values. This sequence number is used to establish a total
ordering of MPL Data Messages generated by an MPL Seed for an MPL
Domain.

9. MPL Data Messages

9.1. MPL Data Message Generation

MPL Data Messages are generated by MPL Seeds when these messages
enter the MPL Domain. All MPL Data Messages have the following
properties:

o The IPv6 Source Address MUST be an address in the AddressSet of a
corresponding MPL Interface and MUST be valid within the MPL
Domain.

o The IPv6 Destination Address MUST be set to the MPL Domain Address
corresponding to the MPL Domain.

o An MPL Data Message MUST contain an MPL Option in its IPv6 header
to identify the MPL Seed that generated the message and the
ordering relative to other MPL Data Messages generated by the
MPL Seed.

When the destination address is an MPL Domain Address and the source
address is in the AddressList of an MPL Interface that belongs to
that MPL Domain Address, the application message and the MPL Data
Message MAY be identical. In other words, the MPL Data Message may
contain a single IPv6 header that includes the MPL Option.

Otherwise, IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation MUST be used to satisfy the MPL
Data Message requirements listed above [RFC2473]. The complete
IPv6-in-IPv6 message forms an MPL Data Message. The outer IPv6

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 19]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

header conforms to the MPL Data Message requirements listed above.
The encapsulated IPv6 datagram encodes the multicast data message
that is communicated beyond the MPL Domain.

9.2. MPL Data Message Transmission

An MPL Forwarder manages transmission of MPL Data Messages in its
Buffered Message Sets using the Trickle algorithm [RFC6206]. An MPL
Forwarder MUST use a separate Trickle timer for each MPL Data Message
that it is actively forwarding. In accordance with Section 5 of
RFC 6206 [RFC6206], the following items apply:

o This document defines a "consistent" transmission as receiving an
MPL Data Message that has the same MPL Domain Address, seed-id,
and sequence value as the MPL Data Message managed by the
Trickle timer.

o This document defines an "inconsistent" transmission as receiving
an MPL Data Message that has the same MPL Domain Address, seed-id
value, and the M flag set, but has a sequence value less than that
of the MPL Data Message managed by the Trickle timer.

o This document does not define any external "events".

o This document defines MPL Data Messages as Trickle messages.

o The actions outside the Trickle algorithm that MPL takes involve
managing the MPL Domain's Seed Set and Buffered Message Set.

As specified in [RFC6206], a Trickle timer has three variables: the
current interval size I, a time within the current interval t, and a
counter c. MPL defines a fourth variable, e, which counts the number
of Trickle timer expiration events since the Trickle timer was last
reset.

After DATA_MESSAGE_TIMER_EXPIRATIONS Trickle timer events, the MPL
Forwarder MUST disable the Trickle timer. When a buffered MPL Data
Message does not have an associated Trickle timer, the MPL Forwarder
MAY delete the message from the Buffered Message Set by advancing the
MinSequence value of the corresponding MPL Seed in the Seed Set.
When the MPL Forwarder no longer buffers any messages for an MPL
Seed, the MPL Forwarder MUST NOT increment MinSequence for that
MPL Seed.

When transmitting an MPL Data Message, the MPL Forwarder MUST either
set the M flag to zero or set it to a level that indicates whether or
not the message's sequence number is the largest value that has been
received from the MPL Seed.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 20]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

9.3. MPL Data Message Processing

Upon receiving an MPL Data Message, the MPL Forwarder first processes
the MPL Option and updates the Trickle timer associated with the MPL
Data Message if one exists.

Upon receiving an MPL Data Message, an MPL Forwarder MUST perform one
of the following actions:

o Accept the message and enter the MPL Data Message in the MPL
Domain's Buffered Message Set.

o Accept the message and update the corresponding MinSequence in
the MPL Domain's Seed Set to 1 greater than the message's
sequence number.

o Discard the message without any change to the MPL
Information Base.

If a Seed Set entry exists for the MPL Seed, the MPL Forwarder MUST
discard the MPL Data Message if its sequence number is less than
MinSequence or exists in the Buffered Message Set.

If a Seed Set entry does not exist for the MPL Seed, the MPL
Forwarder MUST create a new entry for the MPL Seed before accepting
the MPL Data Message.

If memory is limited, an MPL Forwarder SHOULD reclaim memory
resources by:

o Incrementing MinSequence entries in a Seed Set and deleting MPL
Data Messages in the corresponding Buffered Message Set that fall
below the MinSequence value.

o Deleting other Seed Set entries that have expired and the
corresponding MPL Data Messages in the Buffered Message Set.

If the MPL Forwarder accepts the MPL Data Message, the MPL Forwarder
MUST perform the following actions:

o Reset the Lifetime of the corresponding Seed Set entry to
SEED_SET_ENTRY_LIFETIME.

o If PROACTIVE_FORWARDING is TRUE, the MPL Forwarder MUST initialize
and start a Trickle timer for the MPL Data Message.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 21]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

o If the MPL Control Message Trickle timer is not running and
CONTROL_MESSAGE_TIMER_EXPIRATIONS is non-zero, the MPL Forwarder
MUST initialize and start the MPL Control Message Trickle timer.

o If the MPL Control Message Trickle timer is running, the MPL
Forwarder MUST reset the MPL Control Message Trickle timer.

10. MPL Control Messages

10.1. MPL Control Message Generation

An MPL Forwarder generates MPL Control Messages to communicate an MPL
Domain's Seed Set and Buffered Message Set to neighboring MPL
Forwarders. Each MPL Control Message is generated according to
Section 6.2, with an MPL Seed Info entry for each entry in the MPL
Domain's Seed Set. Each MPL Seed Info entry has the following
content:

o S set to the size of the seed-id field in the MPL Seed Info entry.

o min-seqno set to the MinSequence value of the MPL Seed.

o bm-len set to the size of buffered-mpl-messages in octets.

o seed-id set to the MPL Seed Identifier.

o buffered-mpl-messages with each bit representing whether or not an
MPL Data Message with the corresponding sequence number exists in
the Buffered Message Set. The i-th bit represents a sequence
number of min-seqno + i. '0' indicates that the corresponding MPL
Data Message does not exist in the Buffered Message Set. '1'
indicates that the corresponding MPL Data Message does exist in
the Buffered Message Set.

10.2. MPL Control Message Transmission

An MPL Forwarder transmits MPL Control Messages using the Trickle
algorithm. An MPL Forwarder maintains a single Trickle timer for
each MPL Domain. When CONTROL_MESSAGE_TIMER_EXPIRATIONS is 0, the
MPL Forwarder does not execute the Trickle algorithm and does not
transmit MPL Control Messages. In accordance with Section 5 of
RFC 6206 [RFC6206], the following items apply:

o This document defines a "consistent" transmission as receiving an
MPL Control Message that results in a determination that neither
the receiving nor transmitting node has any new MPL Data Messages
to offer.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 22]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

o This document defines an "inconsistent" transmission as receiving
an MPL Control Message that results in a determination that either
the receiving or transmitting node has at least one new MPL Data
Message to offer.

o The Trickle timer is reset in response to external "events". This
document defines an "event" as increasing the MinSequence value of
any entry in the corresponding Seed Set or adding a message to the
corresponding Buffered Message Set.

o This document defines an MPL Control Message as a Trickle message.

As specified in [RFC6206], a Trickle timer has three variables: the
current interval size I, a time within the current interval t, and a
counter c. MPL defines a fourth variable, e, which counts the number
of Trickle timer expiration events since the Trickle timer was last
reset. After CONTROL_MESSAGE_TIMER_EXPIRATIONS Trickle timer events,
the MPL Forwarder MUST disable the Trickle timer.

10.3. MPL Control Message Processing

An MPL Forwarder processes each MPL Control Message that it receives
to determine if it has any new MPL Data Messages to receive or offer.

An MPL Forwarder determines if a new MPL Data Message has not been
received from a neighboring node if any of the following conditions
hold true:

o The MPL Control Message includes an MPL Seed that does not exist
in the MPL Domain's Seed Set.

o The MPL Control Message indicates that the neighbor has an MPL
Data Message in its Buffered Message Set with sequence number
greater than MinSequence (i.e., the i-th bit is set to 1 and
min-seqno + i > MinSequence) and is not included in the MPL
Domain's Buffered Message Set.

When an MPL Forwarder determines that it has not yet received an MPL
Data Message buffered by a neighboring device, the MPL Forwarder MUST
reset its Trickle timer associated with MPL Control Message
transmissions. If an MPL Control Message Trickle timer is not
running, the MPL Forwarder MUST initialize and start a new
Trickle timer.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 23]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

An MPL Forwarder determines if an MPL Data Message in the Buffered
Message Set has not yet been received by a neighboring MPL Forwarder
if any of the following conditions hold true:

o The MPL Control Message does not include an MPL Seed for the MPL
Data Message.

o The MPL Data Message's sequence number is greater than or equal to
min-seqno and not included in the neighbor's corresponding
Buffered Message Set (i.e., the MPL Data Message's sequence number
does not have a corresponding bit in buffered-mpl-messages
set to 1).

When an MPL Forwarder determines that it has at least one MPL Data
Message in its corresponding Buffered Message Set that has not yet
been received by a neighbor, the MPL Forwarder MUST reset the MPL
Control Message Trickle timer. Additionally, for each of those
entries in the Buffered Message Set, the MPL Forwarder MUST reset the
Trickle timer and reset e to 0. If a Trickle timer is not associated
with the MPL Data Message, the MPL Forwarder MUST initialize and
start a new Trickle timer.

11. IANA Considerations

This document defines one IPv6 Option, a type that has been allocated
from the IPv6 "Destination Options and Hop-by-Hop Options" registry
of [RFC2780].

This document defines one ICMPv6 Message, a type that has been
allocated from the "ICMPv6 'type' Numbers" registry of [RFC4443].

This document registers a well-known multicast address from the
"Variable Scope Multicast Addresses" registry of [RFC3307].

11.1. MPL Option Type

IANA has allocated an IPv6 Option Type from the IPv6 "Destination
Options and Hop-by-Hop Options" registry of [RFC2780], as specified
in Table 1 below:

+-----------+-----+-----+-------+-------------+-----------+
| Hex Value | act | chg | rest | Description | Reference |
+-----------+-----+-----+-------+-------------+-----------+
| 0x6D | 01 | 1 | 01101 | MPL Option | RFC 7731 |
+-----------+-----+-----+-------+-------------+-----------+

Table 1: IPv6 Option Type Allocation

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 24]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

Note: IANA has marked the value 0x4D (previously "MPL Option") as
"Deprecated".

11.2. MPL ICMPv6 Type

IANA has allocated an ICMPv6 Type from the "ICMPv6 'type' Numbers"
registry of [RFC4443], as specified in Table 2 below:

+------+---------------------+-----------+
| Type | Name | Reference |
+------+---------------------+-----------+
| 159 | MPL Control Message | RFC 7731 |
+------+---------------------+-----------+

Table 2: ICMPv6 Type Allocation

11.3. Well-Known Multicast Addresses

IANA has allocated an IPv6 multicast address, with Group ID in the
range [0x01,0xFF] for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area
Network (6LoWPAN) compression [RFC6282], "ALL_MPL_FORWARDERS" from
the "Variable Scope Multicast Addresses" sub-registry of the "IPv6
Multicast Address Space Registry" [RFC3307], as specified in Table 3
below:

+---------------------+--------------------+-----------+------------+
| Address(es) | Description | Reference | Date |
| | | | Registered |
+---------------------+--------------------+-----------+------------+
| FF0X:0:0:0:0:0:0:FC | ALL_MPL_FORWARDERS | RFC 7731 | 2013-04-10 |
+---------------------+--------------------+-----------+------------+

Table 3: Variable Scope Multicast Address Allocation

12. Security Considerations

MPL uses sequence numbers to maintain a total ordering of MPL Data
Messages from an MPL Seed. The use of sequence numbers allows a
denial-of-service attack where an attacker can spoof a message with a
sufficiently large sequence number to (i) flush messages from the
Buffered Message List and (ii) increase the MinSequence value for an
MPL Seed in the corresponding Seed Set. In both cases, the side
effect allows an attacker to halt the forwarding process of any MPL
Data Messages being disseminated and prevents MPL Forwarders from
accepting new MPL Data Messages that an MPL Seed generates while the
sequence number is less than MinSequence or until the corresponding
Seed Set Entry expires. The net effect applies to both proactive and
reactive forwarding modes.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 25]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

In general, the basic ability to inject messages into an LLN may be
used as a denial-of-service attack, regardless of what forwarding
protocol is used. Because MPL is a dissemination protocol, the
ability to spoof MPL messages allows an attacker to affect an entire
MPL Domain. For these reasons, LLNs typically employ link-layer
security mechanisms to mitigate an attacker's ability to inject
messages. For example, the IEEE 802.15.4 [IEEE802.15.4] standard
specifies frame security mechanisms using AES-128 to support access
control, message integrity, message confidentiality, and replay
protection. However, if the attack vector includes attackers that
have access to the LLN, then MPL SHOULD NOT be used.

To prevent attackers from injecting packets through an MPL Forwarder,
the MPL Forwarder MUST NOT accept or forward MPL Data Messages from a
communication interface that does not subscribe to the MPL Domain
Address identified in the message's destination address.

MPL uses the Trickle algorithm to manage message transmissions;
therefore, the security considerations described in [RFC6206] apply.

13. References

13.1. Normative References

[RFC1982] Elz, R. and R. Bush, "Serial Number Arithmetic", RFC 1982,
DOI 10.17487/RFC1982, August 1996,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1982>.

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

[RFC2460] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
(IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, DOI 10.17487/RFC2460,
December 1998, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2460>.

[RFC2473] Conta, A. and S. Deering, "Generic Packet Tunneling in
IPv6 Specification", RFC 2473, DOI 10.17487/RFC2473,
December 1998, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2473>.

[RFC2780] Bradner, S. and V. Paxson, "IANA Allocation Guidelines For
Values In the Internet Protocol and Related Headers",
BCP 37, RFC 2780, DOI 10.17487/RFC2780, March 2000,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2780>.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 26]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

[RFC3307] Haberman, B., "Allocation Guidelines for IPv6 Multicast
Addresses", RFC 3307, DOI 10.17487/RFC3307, August 2002,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3307>.

[RFC4007] Deering, S., Haberman, B., Jinmei, T., Nordmark, E., and
B. Zill, "IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture", RFC 4007,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4007, March 2005,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4007>.

[RFC4443] Conta, A., Deering, S., and M. Gupta, Ed., "Internet
Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet
Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", RFC 4443,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4443, March 2006,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4443>.

[RFC6206] Levis, P., Clausen, T., Hui, J., Gnawali, O., and J. Ko,
"The Trickle Algorithm", RFC 6206, DOI 10.17487/RFC6206,
March 2011, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6206>.

[RFC6282] Hui, J., Ed., and P. Thubert, "Compression Format for IPv6
Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-Based Networks", RFC 6282,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6282, September 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6282>.

[RFC6550] Winter, T., Ed., Thubert, P., Ed., Brandt, A., Hui, J.,
Kelsey, R., Levis, P., Pister, K., Struik, R., Vasseur,
JP., and R. Alexander, "RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for
Low-Power and Lossy Networks", RFC 6550,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6550, March 2012,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6550>.

[RFC7346] Droms, R., "IPv6 Multicast Address Scopes", RFC 7346,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7346, August 2014,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7346>.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 27]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

13.2. Informative References

[Clausen2013]
Clausen, T., de Verdiere, A., and J. Yi, "Performance
Analysis of Trickle as a Flooding Mechanism", The 15th
IEEE International Conference on Communication
Technology (ICCT2013), DOI 10.1109/ICCT.2013.6820439,
November 2013.

[IEEE802.15.4]
IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area
networks--Part 15.4: Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area
Networks (LR-WPANs)", IEEE 802.15.4,
DOI 10.1109/ieeestd.2011.6012487,
<http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/
opac?punumber=6012485>.

[RFC3973] Adams, A., Nicholas, J., and W. Siadak, "Protocol
Independent Multicast - Dense Mode (PIM-DM): Protocol
Specification (Revised)", RFC 3973, DOI 10.17487/RFC3973,
January 2005, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3973>.

[RFC4601] Fenner, B., Handley, M., Holbrook, H., and I. Kouvelas,
"Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM):
Protocol Specification (Revised)", RFC 4601,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4601, August 2006,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4601>.

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 28]

RFC 7731 MPL February 2016

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the helpful comments of Robert
Cragie, Esko Dijk, Ralph Droms, Paul Duffy, Adrian Farrel, Ulrich
Herberg, Owen Kirby, Philip Levis, Kerry Lynn, Joseph Reddy, Michael
Richardson, Ines Robles, Don Sturek, Dario Tedeschi, and Peter
van der Stok, which greatly improved the document.

Authors' Addresses

Jonathan W. Hui
Nest Labs
3400 Hillview Ave.
Palo Alto, California 94304
United States

Phone: +650 253 2770
Email: [email protected]

Richard Kelsey
Silicon Labs
25 Thomson Place
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
United States

Phone: +617 951 1225
Email: [email protected]

Hui & Kelsey Standards Track [Page 29]