Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          R. Droms
Request for Comments: 7346                                         Cisco
Updates: 4007, 4291                                          August 2014
Category: Standards Track
ISSN: 2070-1721


                    IPv6 Multicast Address Scopes

Abstract

  This document updates the definitions of IPv6 multicast scopes and
  therefore updates RFCs 4007 and 4291.

Status of This Memo

  This is an Internet Standards Track document.

  This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
  (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
  received public review and has been approved for publication by the
  Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
  Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

  Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
  and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
  http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7346.
























Droms                        Standards Track                    [Page 1]

RFC 7346              IPv6 Multicast Address Scopes          August 2014


Copyright Notice

  Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
  document authors.  All rights reserved.

  This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
  Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
  (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
  publication of this document.  Please review these documents
  carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
  to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
  include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
  the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
  described in the Simplified BSD License.

  This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
  Contributions published or made publicly available before November
  10, 2008.  The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
  material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
  modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
  Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
  the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
  outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
  not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
  it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
  than English.

1.  Introduction

  RFC 4291 [RFC4291] defines "scop" as "a 4-bit multicast scope value
  used to limit the scope of the multicast group" and defines "scop 3"
  as "reserved".  The multicast protocol specification in [MPL] desires
  to use multicast scop 3 to transport multicast traffic scoped to a
  network of nodes connected in a mesh.  This scop value is used to
  accommodate a multicast scope that is greater than Link-Local but is
  also automatically determined by the network architecture.















Droms                        Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 7346              IPv6 Multicast Address Scopes          August 2014


2.  Definition of IPv6 Multicast Address Scopes (Updates RFC 4291)

  The following table updates the definitions in [RFC4291]:

     +------+--------------------------+-------------------------+
     | scop | NAME                     | REFERENCE               |
     +------+--------------------------+-------------------------+
     |  0   | Reserved                 | [RFC4291], RFC 7346     |
     |  1   | Interface-Local scope    | [RFC4291], RFC 7346     |
     |  2   | Link-Local scope         | [RFC4291], RFC 7346     |
     |  3   | Realm-Local scope        | [RFC4291], RFC 7346     |
     |  4   | Admin-Local scope        | [RFC4291], RFC 7346     |
     |  5   | Site-Local scope         | [RFC4291], RFC 7346     |
     |  6   | Unassigned               |                         |
     |  7   | Unassigned               |                         |
     |  8   | Organization-Local scope | [RFC4291], RFC 7346     |
     |  9   | Unassigned               |                         |
     |  A   | Unassigned               |                         |
     |  B   | Unassigned               |                         |
     |  C   | Unassigned               |                         |
     |  D   | Unassigned               |                         |
     |  E   | Global scope             | [RFC4291], RFC 7346     |
     |  F   | Reserved                 | [RFC4291], RFC 7346     |
     +------+--------------------------+-------------------------+

  The following change is applied to Section 2.7 of [RFC4291].

  OLD:

     Admin-Local scope is the smallest scope that must be
     administratively configured, i.e., not automatically derived from
     physical connectivity or other, non-multicast-related
     configuration.

  NEW:

     Interface-Local, Link-Local, and Realm-Local scope boundaries are
     automatically derived from physical connectivity or other non-
     multicast-related configurations.  Global scope has no boundary.
     The boundaries of all other non-reserved scopes of Admin-Local or
     larger are administratively configured.  For reserved scopes, the
     way of configuring their boundaries will be defined when the
     semantics of the scope are defined.

     According to RFC 4007 [RFC4007], the zone of a Realm-Local scope
     must fall within zones of larger scope.  Because the zone of a
     Realm-Local scope is configured automatically while the zones of
     larger scopes are configured manually, care must be taken in the



Droms                        Standards Track                    [Page 3]

RFC 7346              IPv6 Multicast Address Scopes          August 2014


     definition of those larger scopes to ensure that the inclusion
     constraint is met.

     Realm-Local scopes created by different network technologies are
     considered to be independent and will have different zone indices
     (see Section 6 of [RFC4007]).  A router with interfaces on links
     using different network technologies does not forward traffic
     between the Realm-Local multicast scopes defined by those
     technologies.

3.  Definition of Realm-Local Scopes

  The definition of any Realm-Local scope for a particular network
  technology should be published in an RFC.  For example, such a scope
  definition would be appropriate for publication in an "IPv6-over-foo"
  RFC.

  Any RFCs that include the definition of a Realm-Local scope will be
  added to the IANA "IPv6 Multicast Address Scopes" registry under the
  Realm-Local scope entry, and those specifications must include such a
  request in their IANA Considerations.

  Section 5 of this document gives the definition of scop 3 for IEEE
  802.15.4 [IEEE802.15.4] networks.

4.  Definition of Automatic and Administratively Configured Scopes
   (Updates RFC 4007)

  Section 5 of RFC 4007 [RFC4007] and Section 2.7 of RFC 4291 [RFC4291]
  disagree on the way in which multicast scop 3 is configured.  To
  resolve that disagreement, the last bullet in the list in Section 5
  of [RFC4007] is updated as follows:

  OLD:

  o  The boundaries of zones of a scope other than interface-local,
     link-local, and global must be defined and configured by network
     administrators.

  NEW:

  o  The boundaries of zones of a scope are defined by the IPv6
     addressing architecture [RFC4291] and updated by RFC 7346.








Droms                        Standards Track                    [Page 4]

RFC 7346              IPv6 Multicast Address Scopes          August 2014


5.  Definition of Realm-Local Scope for IEEE 802.15.4

  When used in an IP-over-IEEE802.15.4 network, scop 3 is defined to
  include all interfaces sharing a Personal Area Network Identifier
  (PAN ID).

6.  IANA Considerations

  IANA has established a sub-registry titled "IPv6 Multicast Address
  Scopes" in the existing "IPv6 Multicast Address Space Registry".  The
  new registry has been populated with the scop values given in
  Section 2.  New definitions for scop values will be made following
  the "IETF Review" policy [RFC5226].

  For each future RFC that defines a Realm-Local scope for new network
  technologies (scop 3), IANA will add a reference to the defining
  document in the "IPv6 Multicast Address Scopes" registry.  Such RFCs
  are expected to make an explicit request to IANA for inclusion in the
  registry.

  IANA has included a note on the top of the "IPv6 Multicast Address
  Scopes" registry:

     The definition of any Realm-Local scope for a particular network
     technology should be published in an RFC.  For example, such a
     scope definition would be appropriate for publication in an 'IPv6-
     over-foo' RFC.

     Any RFCs that define a Realm-Local scope will be listed in this
     registry as an additional reference in the Realm-Local scope
     entry.  Such RFCs are expected to make an explicit request to IANA
     for inclusion in this registry.

7.  Acknowledgments

  Robert Cragie, Kerry Lynn, Jinmei Tatuya, Dave Thaler, and Stig
  Venaas all contributed text and/or review to ensure that the updates
  to RFC 4007 and RFC 4291 are correct.

8.  Security Considerations

  This document has no security considerations beyond those in RFC 4007
  [RFC4007] and RFC 4291 [RFC4291].








Droms                        Standards Track                    [Page 5]

RFC 7346              IPv6 Multicast Address Scopes          August 2014


9.  References

9.1.  Normative References

  [RFC4007]  Deering, S., Haberman, B., Jinmei, T., Nordmark, E., and
             B. Zill, "IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture", RFC 4007,
             March 2005.

  [RFC4291]  Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
             Architecture", RFC 4291, February 2006.

9.2.  Informative References

  [IEEE802.15.4]
             IEEE Computer Society, "IEEE Std. 802.15.4-2006", October
             2006.

  [MPL]      Hui, J. and R. Kelsey, "Multicast Protocol for Low power
             and Lossy Networks (MPL)", Work in Progress, April 2014.

  [RFC5226]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
             IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
             May 2008.

Author's Address

  Ralph Droms
  Cisco
  1414 Massachusetts Avenue
  Boxborough, MA  01719
  USA

  Phone: +1 978 936 1674
  EMail: [email protected]

















Droms                        Standards Track                    [Page 6]