Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                         V. Giralt
Request for Comments: 6338                                  Univ. Malaga
Category: Informational                                        R. McDuff
ISSN: 2070-1721                                         Univ. Queensland
                                                            August 2011


        Definition of a Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace
                 for the Schema for Academia (SCHAC)

Abstract

  This document describes a Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespace for
  the Schema for Academia (SCHAC).

  The namespace described in this document is for naming persistent
  resources defined by the SCHAC participants internationally, their
  working groups, and other designated subordinates.  The main use of
  this namespace will be for the creation of controlled vocabulary
  values for attributes in the SCHAC schema.  These values will be
  associated with particular instances of persons or objects belonging
  to any of the SCHAC object classes.

Status of This Memo

  This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
  published for informational purposes.

  This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
  (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
  received public review and has been approved for publication by the
  Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not all documents
  approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet
  Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.

  Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
  and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
  http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6338.













Giralt & McDuff               Informational                     [Page 1]

RFC 6338                   SCHAC URN Namespace               August 2011


Copyright Notice

  Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
  document authors.  All rights reserved.

  This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
  Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
  (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
  publication of this document.  Please review these documents
  carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
  to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
  include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
  the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
  described in the Simplified BSD License.

1.  Introduction

  The Schema for Academia (SCHAC) international activity was born
  inside the Task Force on European Middleware Coordination and
  Collaboration (TF-EMC2) of the Trans-European Research and Education
  Networking Association (TERENA) [6].  The initial aim of SCHAC was to
  harmonize the disjoint person schemas of the participating countries
  in order to have a common way for expressing data about persons,
  exchanged between educational organizations.  SCHAC, as are other
  person schemas, is designed to ease the sharing of information about
  a given individual between parties, mostly, but not limited to,
  educational and research institutions.  The main aims of this sharing
  are to provide resources to individuals and to allow said individuals
  to move, virtually and physically, between such institutions.  Thus,
  the SCHAC schema was defined with input from all participants'
  national person schemas [7].

  SCHAC does not supplant other person schemas such as
  organizationalPerson [8], inetOrgPerson [9], or eduPerson [10]; it
  extends those where needed for the purposes of Higher Education
  outside the United States.  This characteristic has made SCHAC,
  originally a European effort, useful for groups outside Europe.

2.  Requirements Language

  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
  "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
  document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [1].








Giralt & McDuff               Informational                     [Page 2]

RFC 6338                   SCHAC URN Namespace               August 2011


3.  Specification Template

  Namespace ID:

     schac

  Registration Information:

     Registration Version Number 1

     Registration Date: 2011-06-22

  Registrant of the namespace:

     European Committee for Academic Middleware (ECAM)
     Trans-European Research and Education Networking Association
     (TERENA)
     Singel
     Amsterdam
     The Netherlands

  Designated contacts:

     Contact: Licia Florio
     Affiliation: TERENA
     Singel 468 D
     Amsterdam, 1017 AW
     The Netherlands

     EMail: [email protected]
     Phone: +31(0)20 5304488


     Contact: Victoriano Giralt
     Affiliation: University of Malaga
     Central ICT Services
     Blvd. Louis Pasteur, 33
     Campus de Teatinos
     29071 Malaga
     Spain

     EMail: [email protected]
     Phone: +34 95 213 1415








Giralt & McDuff               Informational                     [Page 3]

RFC 6338                   SCHAC URN Namespace               August 2011


  Syntactic structure:

     The Namespace Specific Strings (NSSs) of all URNs assigned by
     SCHAC will conform to the syntax defined in Section 2.2 of
     RFC 2141, "URN Syntax" [11].  In addition, all SCHAC URN NSSs will
     consist of a left-to-right series of tokens delimited by colons.
     The left-to-right sequence of colon-delimited tokens corresponds
     to descending nodes in a tree.  To the right of the lowest naming
     authority node, there may be zero, one, or more levels of
     hierarchical naming nodes terminating in a rightmost leaf node.
     See the "Identifier assignment" section below for more on the
     semantics of NSSs.  This syntax convention is captured in the
     following normative ABNF rules for SCHAC NSSs (see RFC 5234 [2]):

          SCHAC-NSS    =   1*subStChar *( ":" 1*subStChar )

          subStChar    =   trans / "%" HEXDIG HEXDIG

          trans        =   ALPHA / DIGIT / other / reserved

          other        =   "(" / ")" / "+" / "," / "-" / "." /
                           "=" / "@" / ";" / "$" /
                           "_" / "!" / "*" / "'"

          reserved     =   "/" / "?" / "#"

     The exclusion of the colon from the list of "other" characters
     means that the colon can only occur as a delimiter between string
     tokens.  Note that this ABNF rule set guarantees that any valid
     SCHAC NSS is also a valid RFC 2141 NSS.

  Relevant ancillary documentation:

     None.

  Identifier uniqueness:

     It is the responsibility of TERENA to guarantee uniqueness of the
     names of immediately subordinate naming authorities.  Each lower-
     level naming authority in turn inherits the responsibility of
     guaranteeing uniqueness of names in its branch of the naming tree.










Giralt & McDuff               Informational                     [Page 4]

RFC 6338                   SCHAC URN Namespace               August 2011


  Identifier persistence:

     TERENA bears ultimate responsibility for maintaining the usability
     of SCHAC URNs over time.  This responsibility MAY be delegated to
     subordinate naming authorities per the discussion in the section
     below on identifier assignment.  That section provides a mechanism
     for the delegation to be revoked in the case where a subordinate
     naming authority ceases to function.

  Identifier assignment:

     TERENA will create an initial series of immediately subordinate
     naming authorities, and will define a process for adding to that
     list of authorities.  Such a list, and the policy for adding to
     it, will be published at the root registry page.  Each country
     with a representative in SCHAC will be invited to designate a
     naming authority.  Country-specific namespaces based on the
     country Internet Top-Level Domain (TLD) [12] will then be assigned
     to the designated authority.  The subordinated namespaces int and
     eu will remain under TERENA authority, controlled by the SCHAC
     activity members, for entities of global, international, or
     European interest.  There is also the possibility of granting
     subordinate namespaces to multi-country organizations; in this
     case, the organizational Internet Fully Qualified Domain Name
     (FQDN) will be used as the prefix.

     As an example, a European-level interest entity would be any value
     related to information used in the Higher Education European
     Space, or the so-called Bologna process.  Such entities will
     belong in the eu subordinate namespace.

     Global international entities could encompass values related to
     the Grid community or values useful both for some European and for
     some Australian universities.  Such entities would belong in the
     int subordinate namespace.

     Examples of multi-country organizations include TERENA itself or
     an association like the Educational Policy Institute (EPI)
     (educationalpolicy.org) that has members from Australia, Canada,
     and the US.

     URNs intended for values of SCHAC attributes will include the
     attribute name immediately after the NSS prefix, before any
     geographical namespace delegation, such that any string can convey
     information about the attribute for which it is a value.  For
     example, values for schacUserStatus will be of the form:





Giralt & McDuff               Informational                     [Page 5]

RFC 6338                   SCHAC URN Namespace               August 2011


               urn:schac:userStatus:int
               urn:schac:userStatus:au or
               urn:schac:userStatus:terena.org

     If at all possible, automated registry publication mechanisms will
     be provided, based on the work on distributed URN registries done
     by the TF-EMC2 task force members.

     Institutions and communities affiliated with SCHAC participants
     may request that they be granted subordinate naming authority
     status.  Uniqueness of these namespaces under country authority
     will be based on the requestor's Internet FQDN.  This
     subordination procedure SHOULD be carried along the delegation
     chain; i.e., if at all possible, all entities that receive a
     delegated namespace MUST have a valid FQDN and MUST publish an
     Internet accessible URN value registry, based on the URN registry
     mechanisms designed by the TF-EMC2 task force members.

     On at least an annual basis, TERENA will contact the liaisons or
     directors of each immediately subordinate naming authority.  If
     there is no response, or if the respondent indicates that they
     wish to relinquish naming authority, the authority over that
     branch of the tree reverts to TERENA.  This process will be
     enforced recursively by each naming authority on its subordinates.
     This process guarantees that responsibility for each branch of the
     tree will lapse for less than one year, at worst, before being
     reclaimed by a superior authority.

     Lexical equivalence of two SCHAC Namespace Specific Strings (NSSs)
     is defined below as an exact, case-sensitive string match.  TERENA
     will assign names of immediately subordinate naming authorities in
     lowercase only.  This forestalls the registration of two SCHAC-
     subordinate naming authorities whose names differ only in case.
     Attribute names will use the same mixed-case format as in the
     schema definition.

  Identifier resolution:

     The namespace is not currently listed with a Resolution Discovery
     System (RDS), but nothing about the namespace prohibits the future
     definition of appropriate resolution methods or listing with
     an RDS.

     TERENA will maintain a registry of all SCHAC-assigned URN values,
     both final and for delegation, on its web site:

     https://urnreg.terena.org/




Giralt & McDuff               Informational                     [Page 6]

RFC 6338                   SCHAC URN Namespace               August 2011


     Delegation entries will have a pointer to the registry of the
     subordinate naming authority.  This SHOULD recurse down the
     delegation tree, but registries for several delegated namespaces
     MAY be maintained by a single naming authority.

     All registries MUST publish their URNs over https links [3].  The
     https links MUST be secured by sites offering credentials signed
     by a SCHAC-community recognized Certification Authority (CA) using
     the latest secure methods for accessing a web site (which at
     present is the latest version of Transport Layer Security (TLS)
     [4]).  Registries SHOULD consider the user interface implications
     of their choice of CA, taking into account issues like browser
     alerts and blind trust.

  Lexical equivalence:

     Lexical equivalence of two SCHAC Namespace Specific Strings (NSSs)
     is defined as an exact, case-sensitive string match.

  Conformance with URN syntax:

     All SCHAC NSSs fully conform to RFC 2141 syntax rules for NSSs.

  Validation mechanism:

     As specified in the "Identifier resolution" section above, TERENA
     will maintain an index of all SCHAC-assigned URNs on its web site:
     https://urnreg.terena.org/.  Presence in that registry or in any
     subordinate registry implies that a given URN is valid.  Delegated
     naming authorities MUST guarantee that values are valid in their
     assigned spaces.

  Scope:

     Global.

4.  Examples

  The following examples are not guaranteed to be real.  They are
  listed for pedagogical reasons only.

    urn:schac:personalUniqueID:es:DNI:9999999Z
    urn:schac:personalUniqueCode:es:uma.es:codUni:061696758X
    urn:schac:userStatus:au:uq.edu.au:service:mail:receive:disabled
    urn:schac:personalPosition:pl:umk.pl:programmer






Giralt & McDuff               Informational                     [Page 7]

RFC 6338                   SCHAC URN Namespace               August 2011


5.  Security Considerations

  There are no additional security considerations beyond those normally
  associated with the use and resolution of URNs in general.

  In order to guarantee the validity and origin of SCHAC-NSS URN
  values, they MUST be published over https links [3].  The https links
  MUST be secured by sites offering credentials signed by a SCHAC-
  community recognized Certification Authority (CA) using the latest
  secure methods for accessing a web site (which at present is the
  latest version of TLS [4]).

6.  Namespace Considerations

  Registration of a Namespace Identifier (NID) specific to SCHAC is
  reasonable given the following considerations:

     SCHAC would like to assign URNs to some very fine-grained objects.
     This does not seem to be the primary intended use of the XML.org
     namespace (RFC 3120) [13], or the more tightly controlled
     Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information
     Standards (OASIS) [14] namespace (RFC 3121) [15].

     SCHAC seeks naming autonomy.  SCHAC is not a member of OASIS, so
     becoming a subordinate naming authority under the OASIS URN space
     is not an option.  There is the MACE (Middleware Architecture
     Committee for Education) (RFC 3613) [16] namespace, but the SCHAC
     development is done outside of the MACE activity scope; thus, the
     attributes and values do not belong in the MACE namespace.  Using
     the MACE namespace requires that the SCHAC namespace be placed
     under one of the SCHAC participants' namespaces, which hinders its
     global scope.

     SCHAC will want to assign URNs to non-XML objects as well.  That
     is another reason that XML.org may not be an appropriate higher-
     level naming authority for SCHAC.

  Some of the already defined SCHAC attribute values have been assigned
  URNs under the urn:mace:terena.org namespace.  These values will
  enter a deprecation cycle, with a clear indication that they will be
  replaced by values under the new namespace once it is assigned.  In
  any case, RFC 3406 [5] (which replaced RFC 2611) includes an explicit
  statement that two or more URNs may point to the same resource.








Giralt & McDuff               Informational                     [Page 8]

RFC 6338                   SCHAC URN Namespace               August 2011


7.  Community Considerations

  The assignment and use of identifiers within the namespace are open,
  and the related rule is established by the SCHAC activity members.
  Registration agencies (the next-level naming authorities) will be the
  National Research and Education Networks (NRENs) and established
  organizational cross-border organizations that participate in SCHAC.

  It is expected that the majority of the European NRENs, their
  constituencies, participants in the Australian Access Federation, and
  some other international activities will make use of the SCHAC
  namespace.

  After the establishment of the SCHAC namespace, TERENA will establish
  a registry service (analogously to other distributed pan-European
  services, such as eduroam, PerfSONAR, etc.) for the namespace
  clients.  This registry will be available via the root page of the
  namespace: https://urnreg.terena.org/.  The policy for registrations
  will be defined in documents available at the root page of the
  registry.

8.  IANA Considerations

  In accordance with BCP 66 [5], IANA has registered the Formal URN
  Namespace 'schac' in the Registry of URN Namespaces, using the
  registration template presented in Section 2 of this document.

9.  Acknowledgments

  SCHAC is the result of the TERENA TF-EMC2 task force and many others
  that have contributed ideas to the development of the schema.

  This document was discussed on the URN-NID list, with the special
  help of Alfred Hoenes, who thoroughly reviewed the document, helped
  us correct errors, and suggested clarifications to the text.

  Peter Saint-Andre has also provided comments that have improved the
  overall document quality, for which we herein thank him.  We'd also
  like to thank Chris Lonvick for helping us express our security
  concerns in a better way.  Finally, we thank other reviewers that
  have helped us to give the final touches to the text.

  Special thanks should go to Dyonisius Visser from the TERENA
  technical team for taking the time and effort required to set up the
  root instance of the namespace registry.






Giralt & McDuff               Informational                     [Page 9]

RFC 6338                   SCHAC URN Namespace               August 2011


10.  References

10.1.  Normative References

  [1]   Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
        Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

  [2]   Crocker, D., Ed., and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
        Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008.

  [3]   Rescorla, E., "HTTP Over TLS", RFC 2818, May 2000.

  [4]   Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS)
        Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246, August 2008.

  [5]   Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom,
        "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace Definition Mechanisms",
        BCP 66, RFC 3406, October 2002.

10.2.  Informative References

  [6]   TERENA, "Trans-European Research and Education Networking
        Association", <http://www.terena.org/>.

  [7]   TERENA TF-EMC2, "SCHAC activity web site",
        <http://www.terena.org/activities/tf-emc2/schac.html>.

  [8]   Sciberras, A., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
        (LDAP): Schema for User Applications", RFC 4519, June 2006.

  [9]   Smith, M., "Definition of the inetOrgPerson LDAP Object Class",
        RFC 2798, April 2000.

  [10]  MACE-Dir, "eduPerson Object Class Specification",
        December 2007, <http://middleware.internet2.edu/eduperson/docs/
        internet2-mace-dir-eduperson-200712.html>.

  [11]  Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997.

  [12]  IANA, "Country TLDs", <http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/>.

  [13]  Best, K. and N. Walsh, "A URN Namespace for XML.org", RFC 3120,
        June 2001.

  [14]  OASIS, "Organization for the Advancement of Structured
        Information Standards: OASIS", <http://www.oasis-open.org/>.





Giralt & McDuff               Informational                    [Page 10]

RFC 6338                   SCHAC URN Namespace               August 2011


  [15]  Best, K. and N. Walsh, "A URN Namespace for OASIS", RFC 3121,
        June 2001.

  [16]  Morgan, R. and K. Hazelton, "Definition of a Uniform Resource
        Name (URN) Namespace for the Middleware Architecture Committee
        for Education (MACE)", RFC 3613, October 2003.

Authors' Addresses

  Victoriano Giralt, M.D.
  University of Malaga
  Avd. Cervantes, 2
  Malaga, Malaga  E-29071
  Spain

  Phone: +34-95-213-1415
  EMail: [email protected]
  URI:   http://www.uma.es/


  Dr. Rodney McDuff
  The University of Queensland

  EMail: [email protected]
  URI:   http://www.uq.edu.au/


























Giralt & McDuff               Informational                    [Page 11]