Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                         S. Venaas
Request for Comments: 6166                                 Cisco Systems
Category: Standards Track                                     April 2011
ISSN: 2070-1721


                   A Registry for PIM Message Types

Abstract

  This document provides instructions to IANA for the creation of a
  registry for PIM message types.  It specifies the initial content of
  the registry, based on existing RFCs specifying PIM message types.
  It also specifies a procedure for registering new types.

  In addition to this, one message type is reserved, and may be used
  for a future extension of the message type space.

Status of This Memo

  This is an Internet Standards Track document.

  This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
  (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
  received public review and has been approved for publication by the
  Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
  Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

  Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
  and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
  http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6166.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
  document authors.  All rights reserved.

  This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
  Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
  (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
  publication of this document.  Please review these documents
  carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
  to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
  include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
  the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
  described in the Simplified BSD License.





Venaas                       Standards Track                    [Page 1]

RFC 6166            A Registry for PIM Message Types          April 2011


Table of Contents

  1. Introduction ....................................................2
  2. Security Considerations .........................................2
  3. IANA Considerations .............................................2
     3.1. Initial Registry ...........................................3
     3.2. Assignment of New Message Types ............................3
  4. Acknowledgements ................................................3
  5. Informative References ..........................................3

1.  Introduction

  Apart from this document, there is no existing document specifying a
  registry for PIM message types.  PIM version 1 made use of IGMP
  [RFC1112], and there is an IGMP registry [IGMPREG] listing the
  message types used by PIM version 1.  PIM version 2, however, is not
  based on IGMP, and a separate PIM message type registry is needed.
  There are currently several RFCs specifying new PIM version 2 message
  types that should be in this new registry.  They are the RFCs for PIM
  Dense Mode [RFC3973], PIM Sparse Mode [RFC4601], and Bidirectional
  PIM [RFC5015].

  This document specifies the initial content of the new PIM message
  type registry, based on those existing RFCs.  This document also
  specifies a procedure for registering new PIM message types.

  In addition to this, this document reserves one message type.  This
  type may be used for a future extension of the message type space.
  The current message type space is only 4 bits, so it is not unlikely
  that this will be needed.  How exactly the extension should be done
  is left to a future document.

2.  Security Considerations

  This document only creates an IANA registry.  There may be a security
  benefit in a well-known place for finding information on which PIM
  message types are valid and how they are used.  Apart from that,
  there are no security considerations.

3.  IANA Considerations

  IANA has created a PIM message type registry.  It has been placed in
  the "Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM)" branch of the tree.  Each
  entry in the registry consists of a message type, a message name, and
  references to the documents defining the type.  The message type is a
  4-bit integer with possible values from 0 to 15.





Venaas                       Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 6166            A Registry for PIM Message Types          April 2011


3.1.  Initial Registry

  The initial content of the registry should be as follows.

  Type    Name                                      Reference
  ------  ----------------------------------------  -------------------
    0      Hello                                    [RFC3973] [RFC4601]
    1      Register                                 [RFC4601]
    2      Register Stop                            [RFC4601]
    3      Join/Prune                               [RFC3973] [RFC4601]
    4      Bootstrap                                [RFC4601]
    5      Assert                                   [RFC3973] [RFC4601]
    6      Graft                                    [RFC3973]
    7      Graft-Ack                                [RFC3973]
    8      Candidate RP Advertisement               [RFC4601]
    9      State Refresh                            [RFC3973]
   10      DF Election                              [RFC5015]
   11-14   Unassigned
   15      Reserved (for extension of type space)   this document

3.2.  Assignment of New Message Types

  Assignment of new message types is done according to the "IETF
  Review" model; see [RFC5226].

4.  Acknowledgements

  Thanks to Toerless Eckert for his suggestion to reserve a type for
  future extension of the message type space.  Also thanks to Mykyta
  Yevstifeyev for reviewing the document and proposing improvements to
  the text.

5.  Informative References

  [IGMPREG]  IANA, "Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) Type
             Numbers - per [RFC3228], [BCP57]", <http://www.iana.org/>.

  [RFC1112]  Deering, S., "Host extensions for IP multicasting", STD 5,
             RFC 1112, August 1989.

  [RFC3973]  Adams, A., Nicholas, J., and W. Siadak, "Protocol
             Independent Multicast - Dense Mode (PIM-DM): Protocol
             Specification (Revised)", RFC 3973, January 2005.

  [RFC4601]  Fenner, B., Handley, M., Holbrook, H., and I. Kouvelas,
             "Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM):
             Protocol Specification (Revised)", RFC 4601, August 2006.




Venaas                       Standards Track                    [Page 3]

RFC 6166            A Registry for PIM Message Types          April 2011


  [RFC5015]  Handley, M., Kouvelas, I., Speakman, T., and L. Vicisano,
             "Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast (BIDIR-
             PIM)", RFC 5015, October 2007.

  [RFC5226]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
             IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
             May 2008.

Author's Address

  Stig Venaas
  Cisco Systems
  Tasman Drive
  San Jose, CA  95134
  USA

  EMail: [email protected]


































Venaas                       Standards Track                    [Page 4]