Network Working Group M. Crispin
Request for Comments: 5051 University of Washington
Category: Standards Track October 2007
i;unicode-casemap - Simple Unicode Collation Algorithm
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
This document describes "i;unicode-casemap", a simple case-
insensitive collation for Unicode strings. It provides equality,
substring, and ordering operations.
1. Introduction
The "i;ascii-casemap" collation described in [COMPARATOR] is quite
simple to implement and provides case-independent comparisons for the
26 Latin alphabetics. It is specified as the default and/or baseline
comparator in some application protocols, e.g., [IMAP-SORT].
However, the "i;ascii-casemap" collation does not produce
satisfactory results with non-ASCII characters. It is possible, with
a modest extension, to provide a more sophisticated collation with
greater multilingual applicability than "i;ascii-casemap". This
extension provides case-independent comparisons for a much greater
number of characters. It also collates characters with diacriticals
with the non-diacritical character forms.
This collation, "i;unicode-casemap", is intended to be an alternative
to, and preferred over, "i;ascii-casemap". It does not replace the
"i;basic" collation described in [BASIC].
2. Unicode Casemap Collation Description
The "i;unicode-casemap" collation is a simple collation which is
case-insensitive in its treatment of characters. It provides
equality, substring, and ordering operations. The validity test
operation returns "valid" for any input.
Crispin Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 5051 i;unicode-casemap October 2007
This collation allows strings in arbitrary (and mixed) character
sets, as long as the character set for each string is identified and
it is possible to convert the string to Unicode. Strings which have
an unidentified character set and/or cannot be converted to Unicode
are not rejected, but are treated as binary.
Each input string is prepared by converting it to a "titlecased
canonicalized UTF-8" string according to the following steps, using
UnicodeData.txt ([UNICODE-DATA]):
(1) A Unicode codepoint is obtained from the input string.
(a) If the input string is in a known charset that can be
converted to Unicode, a sequence in the string's charset
is read and checked for validity according to the rules of
that charset. If the sequence is valid, it is converted
to a Unicode codepoint. Note that for input strings in
UTF-8, the UTF-8 sequence must be valid according to the
rules of [UTF-8]; e.g., overlong UTF-8 sequences are
invalid.
(b) If the input string is in an unknown charset, or an
invalid sequence occurs in step (1)(a), conversion ceases.
No further preparation is performed, and any partial
preparation results are discarded. The original string is
used unchanged with the i;octet comparator.
(2) The following steps, using UnicodeData.txt ([UNICODE-DATA]),
are performed on the resulting codepoint from step (1)(a).
(a) If the codepoint has a titlecase property in
UnicodeData.txt (this is normally the same as the
uppercase property), the codepoint is converted to the
codepoints in the titlecase property.
(b) If the resulting codepoint from (2)(a) has a decomposition
property of any type in UnicodeData.txt, the codepoint is
converted to the codepoints in the decomposition property.
This step is recursively applied to each of the resulting
codepoints until no more decomposition is possible
(effectively Normalization Form KD).
Example: codepoint U+01C4 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER DZ WITH CARON)
has a titlecase property of U+01C5 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D
WITH SMALL LETTER Z WITH CARON). Codepoint U+01C5 has a
decomposition property of U+0044 (LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D)
U+017E (LATIN SMALL LETTER Z WITH CARON). U+017E has a
decomposition property of U+007A (LATIN SMALL LETTER Z) U+030c
Crispin Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 5051 i;unicode-casemap October 2007
(COMBINING CARON). Neither U+0044, U+007A, nor U+030C have
any decomposition properties. Therefore, U+01C4 is converted
to U+0044 U+007A U+030C by this step.
(3) The resulting codepoint(s) from step (2) is/are appended, in
UTF-8 format, to the "titlecased canonicalized UTF-8" string.
(4) Repeat from step (1) until there is no more data in the input
string.
Following the above preparation process on each string, the equality,
ordering, and substring operations are as for i;octet.
It is permitted to use an alternative implementation of the above
preparation process if it produces the same results. For example, it
may be more convenient for an implementation to convert all input
strings to a sequence of UTF-16 or UTF-32 values prior to performing
any of the step (2) actions. Similarly, if all input strings are (or
are convertible to) Unicode, it may be possible to use UTF-32 as an
alternative to UTF-8 in step (3).
Note: UTF-16 is unsuitable as an alternative to UTF-8 in step (3),
because UTF-16 surrogates will cause i;octet to collate codepoints
U+E0000 through U+FFFF after non-BMP codepoints.
This collation is not locale sensitive. Consequently, care should be
taken when using OS-supplied functions to implement this collation.
Functions such as strcasecmp and toupper are sometimes locale
sensitive and may inconsistently casemap letters.
The i;unicode-casemap collation is well suited to use with many
Internet protocols and computer languages. Use with natural language
is often inappropriate; even though the collation apparently supports
languages such as Swahili and English, in real-world use it tends to
mis-sort a number of types of string:
o people and place names containing scripts that are not collated
according to "alphabetical order".
o words with characters that have diacriticals. However,
i;unicode-casemap generally does a better job than i;ascii-casemap
for most (but not all) languages. For example, German umlaut
letters will sort correctly, but some Scandinavian letters will
not.
o names such as "Lloyd" (which in Welsh sorts after "Lyon", unlike
in English),
o strings containing other non-letter symbols; e.g., euro and pound
sterling symbols, quotation marks other than '"', dashes/hyphens,
etc.
Crispin Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 5051 i;unicode-casemap October 2007
3. Unicode Casemap Collation Registration
<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE collation SYSTEM 'collationreg.dtd'>
<collation rfc="5051" scope="global" intendedUse="common">
<identifier>i;unicode-casemap</identifier>
<title>Unicode Casemap</title>
<operations>equality order substring</operations>
<specification>RFC 5051</specification>
<owner>IETF</owner>
<submitter>
[email protected]</submitter>
</collation>
4. Security Considerations
The security considerations for [UTF-8], [STRINGPREP], and [UNICODE-
SECURITY] apply and are normative to this specification.
The results from this comparator will vary depending upon the
implementation for several reasons. Implementations MUST consider
whether these possibilities are a problem for their use case:
1) New characters added in Unicode may have decomposition or
titlecase properties that will not be known to an implementation
based upon an older revision of Unicode. This impacts step (2).
2) Step (2)(b) defines a subset of Normalization Form KD (NFKD) that
does not require normalization of out-of-order diacriticals.
However, an implementation MAY use an NFKD library routine that
does such normalization. This impacts step (2)(b) and possibly
also step (1)(a), and is an issue only with ill-formed UTF-8
input.
3) The set of charsets handled in step (1)(a) is open-ended. UTF-8
(and, by extension, US-ASCII) are the only mandatory-to-implement
charsets. This impacts step (1)(a).
Implementations SHOULD, as far as feasible, support all the
charsets they are likely to encounter in the input data, in order
to avoid poor collation caused by the fall through to the (1)(b)
rule.
4) Other charsets may have revisions which add new characters that
are not known to an implementation based upon an older revision.
This impacts step (1)(a) and possibly also step (1)(b).
Crispin Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 5051 i;unicode-casemap October 2007
An attacker may create input that is ill-formed or in an unknown
charset, with the intention of impacting the results of this
comparator or exploiting other parts of the system which process this
input in different ways. Note, however, that even well-formed data
in a known charset can impact the result of this comparator in
unexpected ways. For example, an attacker can substitute U+0041
(LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A) with U+0391 (GREEK CAPITAL LETTER ALPHA) or
U+0410 (CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER A) in the intention of causing a
non-match of strings which visually appear the same and/or causing
the string to appear elsewhere in a sort.
5. IANA Considerations
The i;unicode-casemap collation defined in section 2 has been added
to the registry of collations defined in [COMPARATOR].
6. Normative References
[COMPARATOR] Newman, C., Duerst, M., and A. Gulbrandsen,
"Internet Application Protocol Collation
Registry", RFC 4790, February 2007.
[STRINGPREP] Hoffman, P. and M. Blanchet, "Preparation of
Internationalized Strings ("stringprep")", RFC
3454, December 2002.
[UTF-8] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of
ISO 10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, November 2003.
[UNICODE-DATA] <
http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/
UnicodeData.txt>
Although the UnicodeData.txt file referenced
here is part of the Unicode standard, it is
subject to change as new characters are added
to Unicode and errors are corrected in Unicode
revisions. As a result, it may be less stable
than might otherwise be implied by the
standards status of this specification.
[UNICODE-SECURITY] Davis, M. and M. Suignard, "Unicode Security
Considerations", February 2006,
<
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr36/>.
Crispin Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 5051 i;unicode-casemap October 2007
7. Informative References
[BASIC] Newman, C., Duerst, M., and A. Gulbrandsen,
"i;basic - the Unicode Collation Algorithm",
Work in Progress, March 2007.
[IMAP-SORT] Crispin, M. and K. Murchison, "Internet Message
Access Protocol - SORT and THREAD Extensions",
Work in Progress, September 2007.
Author's Address
Mark R. Crispin
Networks and Distributed Computing
University of Washington
4545 15th Avenue NE
Seattle, WA 98105-4527
Phone: +1 (206) 543-5762
EMail:
[email protected]
Crispin Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 5051 i;unicode-casemap October 2007
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
[email protected].
Crispin Standards Track [Page 7]
