Network Working Group                                          A. Newton
Request for Comments: 4991                                VeriSign, Inc.
Category: Standards Track                                    August 2007


      A Common Schema for Internet Registry Information Service
                          Transfer Protocols

Status of This Memo

  This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
  Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
  improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
  Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
  and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

Abstract

  This document describes an XML Schema for use by Internet Registry
  Information Service (IRIS) application transfer protocols that share
  common characteristics.  It describes common information about the
  transfer protocol, such as version, supported extensions, and
  supported security mechanisms.

Table of Contents

  1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
  2.  Document Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
  3.  Formal XML Syntax  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
  4.  Version Information  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
  5.  Size Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
  6.  Authentication Success Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
  7.  Authentication Failure Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
  8.  Other Information  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
  9.  Internationalization Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
  10. IANA Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
    10.1.  XML Namespace URN Registration  . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
  11. Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
  12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
    12.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
    12.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
  Appendix A.  Contributors  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12





Newton                      Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 4991       Common Schema for IRIS Transfer Protocols     August 2007


1.  Introduction

  IRIS [8] has two transfer protocols, LWZ (lightweight using
  compression) [9] and XPC (XML pipelining with chunks) [10], that
  share common negotiation mechanisms.  Both transfer protocols have a
  need for the server to provide rich status information to clients
  during protocol negotiation.  In many cases, this status information
  would be too complex to describe using simple bit fields and length-
  specified octet sequences.  This document defines an XML Schema for
  this rich status information and describes the usage of conformant
  XML for conveying this status information.

  This document defines five types of information used in the
  negotiation of protocol capabilities: version, size, authentication
  success, authentication failure, and other information.  The version
  information is used to negotiate the versions and extensions to the
  transfer protocol, the application operations protocol, and data
  models used by the application operations.  Size information is used
  to indicate request and response size capabilities and errors.
  Authentication success and failure information is used to indicate
  the outcome of an authentication action.  Other types of information
  may also be conveyed that is generally a result of an error but
  cannot be corrected through defined protocol behavior.

  As an example, upon initiation of a connection, a server may send
  version information informing the client of the data models supported
  by the server and the security mechanisms supported by the server.
  The client may then respond appropriately.  For example, the client
  may not recognize any of the data models supported by the server, and
  therefore close the connection.  On the other hand, the client may
  recognize the data models and the security mechanisms and begin the
  procedure to initialize a security mechanism with the server before
  proceeding to query data according to a recognized data model.

  Both LWZ [9] and XPC [10] provide examples of the usage of the XML
  Schema defined in this document.

2.  Document Terminology

  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
  "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
  document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [6].









Newton                      Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 4991       Common Schema for IRIS Transfer Protocols     August 2007


3.  Formal XML Syntax

  The following is the XML Schema used to define transfer protocol
  status information.  See the following specifications: [2], [3], [4],
  [5].  Updates or changes to this schema require a document that
  UPDATES or OBSOLETES this document.

  <?xml version="1.0"?>
  <schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
          xmlns:iristrans="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iris-transport"
          targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iris-transport"
          elementFormDefault="qualified" >

  <annotation>
    <documentation>
      A schema for describing status information
      for use by multiple transfer protocols.
    </documentation>
  </annotation>

  <element name="versions">
    <complexType>
      <sequence>
        <element name="transferProtocol" maxOccurs="unbounded">
          <complexType>
            <sequence>
              <element name="application" minOccurs="0"
                maxOccurs="unbounded">
                <complexType>
                  <sequence>
                    <element name="dataModel" minOccurs="0"
                      maxOccurs="unbounded">
                      <complexType>
                        <attribute name="protocolId" type="token"
                          use="required" />
                        <attribute name="extensionIds"
                          type="normalizedString" />
                      </complexType>
                    </element>
                  </sequence>
                  <attribute name="protocolId" type="token"
                    use="required" />
                  <attribute name="extensionIds"
                    type="normalizedString" />
                </complexType>
              </element>
            </sequence>
            <attribute name="protocolId" type="token" use="required"



Newton                      Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 4991       Common Schema for IRIS Transfer Protocols     August 2007


              />
            <attribute name="extensionIds" type="normalizedString" />
            <attribute name="authenticationIds"
              type="normalizedString" />
            <attribute name="responseSizeOctets"
              type="positiveInteger" />
            <attribute name="requestSizeOctets"
              type="positiveInteger" />
          </complexType>
        </element>
      </sequence>
    </complexType>
  </element>

  <element name="size">
    <complexType>
      <sequence>
        <element name="request"
          minOccurs="0"
          type="iristrans:octetsType" />
        <element name="response"
          minOccurs="0"
          type="iristrans:octetsType" />
      </sequence>
    </complexType>
  </element>

  <complexType name="octetsType">
    <choice>
      <element name="exceedsMaximum">
        <complexType/>
      </element>
      <element name="octets" type="positiveInteger" />
    </choice>
  </complexType>

  <element name="authenticationSuccess">
    <complexType>
      <sequence>
        <element name="description" minOccurs="0"
          maxOccurs="unbounded">
          <complexType>
            <simpleContent>
              <extension base="string">
                <attribute name="language" type="language"
                  use="required"/>
              </extension>
            </simpleContent>



Newton                      Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 4991       Common Schema for IRIS Transfer Protocols     August 2007


          </complexType>
        </element>
        <element name="data" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"
          type="base64Binary"/>
      </sequence>
    </complexType>
  </element>

  <element name="authenticationFailure">
    <complexType>
      <sequence>
        <element name="description" minOccurs="0"
          maxOccurs="unbounded">
          <complexType>
            <simpleContent>
              <extension base="string">
                <attribute name="language" type="language"
                  use="required"/>
              </extension>
            </simpleContent>
          </complexType>
        </element>
      </sequence>
    </complexType>
  </element>

  <element name="other">
    <complexType>
      <sequence>
        <element name="description" minOccurs="0"
          maxOccurs="unbounded">
          <complexType>
            <simpleContent>
              <extension base="string">
                <attribute name="language" type="language"
                  use="required"/>
              </extension>
            </simpleContent>
          </complexType>
        </element>
      </sequence>
      <attribute type="token" name="type" use="required"/>
    </complexType>
  </element>

  </schema>





Newton                      Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 4991       Common Schema for IRIS Transfer Protocols     August 2007


4.  Version Information

  The <versions> element is used to describe version information about
  the transfer protocol, the application protocol, and data models used
  by the application protocol.

  The <versions> element has one or more <transferProtocol> child
  elements. <transferProtocol> elements have zero or more <application>
  child elements.  And <application> elements have zero or more
  <dataModel> elements.  Each of these element types has a 'protocolId'
  attribute identifying the protocol they represent and an optional
  'extensionIds' attribute identifying the protocol extensions they
  support.

  During capabilities negotiation, it is expected that both sides of
  the negotiation recognize the 'protocolId' value of the
  <transferProtocol> element and at least one of the <application> and
  <dataModel> elements.  If the negotiation produces a situation where
  this is not possible, an error SHOULD be given and communication
  ended.  It is not expected that each side must recognize the
  'extensionIds' values, and unrecognized 'extensionIds' values MUST be
  ignored.

  Additionally, the <transferProtocol> element has optional
  'authenticationIds', 'responseSizeOctets', and 'requestSizeOctets'
  attributes.  The 'authenticationIds' attribute identifies
  authentication mechanisms supported by the associated transfer
  protocol.  The 'responseSizeOctets' attribute describes the maximum
  response size in octets the server will give.  The
  'requestSizeOctets' attribute describes the maximum request size in
  octets the server will accept.

  The protocol, extension, and authentication mechanism identifiers are
  of no specific type, and this document defines none.  Specifications
  using this XML Schema MUST define the identifiers for use with the
  <versions> element and its children.

  The meaning of octets for the transfer of data is counted in
  different ways for different transfer protocols.  Some transfer
  protocols need only to specify the octets of the data being
  transferred, while other transfer protocols need to account for
  additional octets used to transfer the data.  Specifications using
  this XML Schema MUST describe how these octet counts are calculated.








Newton                      Standards Track                     [Page 6]

RFC 4991       Common Schema for IRIS Transfer Protocols     August 2007


  The following is example XML describing version information.

  <versions xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iris-transport">
    <transferProtocol protocolId="iris.lwz"
      authenticationIds="PLAIN EXTERNAL">
      <application protocolId="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iris1"
        extensionIds="http://example.com/SIMPLEBAG">
        <dataModel protocolId="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:dchk1"/>
        <dataModel protocolId="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:dreg1"/>
      </application>
    </transferProtocol>
  </versions>

                       Version Information Example

5.  Size Information

  The <size> element provides a means for a server to communicate to a
  client that a given request has exceeded a negotiated size
  (<request>) or that a response to a given request will exceed a
  negotiated size (<response>).

  A server may indicate one of two size conditions by specifying the
  following child elements:

     <exceedsMaximum> - this child element simply indicates that the
     size exceeded the negotiated size.

     <octets> - this child element indicates that the size exceeded the
     negotiated size and conveys the number of octets that is the
     maximum for a request if the parent element is a <request> element
     or the number of octets needed to provide the response if the
     parent element is a <response> element.

  The meaning of octets for the transfer of data is counted in
  different ways for different transfer protocols.  Some transfer
  protocols need only to specify the octets of the data being
  transferred, while other transfer protocols need to account for
  additional octets used to transfer the data.  Specifications using
  this XML Schema MUST describe how these octet counts are calculated.

  The following is example XML describing size information.

  <size xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iris-transport">
    <response>
      <octets>1211</octets>
    </response>
  </size>



Newton                      Standards Track                     [Page 7]

RFC 4991       Common Schema for IRIS Transfer Protocols     August 2007


                        Size Information Example

6.  Authentication Success Information

  The <authenticationSuccess> element indicates that a client has
  successfully authenticated to a server.  Along with this indication,
  it can provide text that may be presented to a user with regard to
  this successful authentication using child <description> elements.

  Each <description> element MUST have a 'language' attribute
  describing the language of the content of the <description> element.
  Clients are not expected to concatenate multiple descriptions;
  therefore, servers MUST NOT provide multiple <description> elements
  with the same language descriptor.

  Finally, additional security data may be sent back with the
  authentication success message using the <data> element.  The content
  of this element is of the base64Binary simple type.

  The following is example XML describing authentication success
  information.

  <authenticationSuccess
    xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iris-transport">
    <description language="en">
      user 'bob' authenticates via password
    </description>
  </authenticationSuccess>

                     Authentication Success Example

7.  Authentication Failure Information

  The <authenticationFailure> element indicates that a client has
  failed to properly authenticate to a server.  Along with this
  indication, it can provide text that may be presented to a user with
  regard to this authentication failure using child <description>
  elements.

  Each <description> element MUST have a 'language' attribute
  describing the language of the content of the <description> element.
  Clients are not expected to concatenate multiple descriptions;
  therefore, servers MUST NOT provide multiple <description> elements
  with the same language descriptor.

  The following is example XML describing authentication failure
  information.




Newton                      Standards Track                     [Page 8]

RFC 4991       Common Schema for IRIS Transfer Protocols     August 2007


  <authenticationFailure
    xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iris-transport">
    <description language="en">
      please consult your admin if you have forgotten your password
    </description>
  </authenticationFailure>

                     Authentication Failure Example

8.  Other Information

  The <other> element conveys status information that may require
  interpretation by a human to be meaningful.  This element has a
  required 'type' attribute, which contains an identifier regarding the
  nature of the information.  This document does not define any
  identifiers for use in this attribute, but the intent is that these
  identifiers are well-known so that clients may take different classes
  of action based on the content of this attribute.  Therefore,
  specifications making use of this XML Schema MUST define these
  identifiers.

  The <other> element may have zero or more <description> elements.
  Each <description> element MUST have a 'language' attribute
  describing the language of the content of the <description> element.
  Servers may use these child elements to convey textual information to
  clients regarding the class (or type) of status information being
  specified by the <other> element.  Clients are not expected to
  concatenate multiple descriptions; therefore, servers MUST NOT
  provide multiple <description> elements with the same language
  descriptor.

  The following is example XML describing other information.

  <other xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iris-transport" type="system">
    <description language="en">unavailable, come back
      later</description>
  </other>

                        Other Information Example

9.  Internationalization Considerations

  XML processors are obliged to recognize both UTF-8 and UTF-16 [1]
  encodings.  XML provides for mechanisms to identify and use other
  character encodings.  Application transfer protocols MUST define
  which additional character encodings, if any, are to be allowed in
  the use of the XML defined in this document.




Newton                      Standards Track                     [Page 9]

RFC 4991       Common Schema for IRIS Transfer Protocols     August 2007


10.  IANA Considerations

10.1.  XML Namespace URN Registration

  This document makes use of the XML namespace and schema registry
  specified in XML_URN [7].  Accordingly, the following registrations
  have been made by IANA:

  o  XML Namespace URN/URI:

     *  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iris-transport

  o  Contact:

     *  Andrew Newton <[email protected]>

  o  XML:

     *  None

  o  XML Schema URN/URI:

     *  urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:iris-transport

  o  Contact:

     *  Andrew Newton <[email protected]>

  o  XML:

     *  The XML Schema specified in Section 3

11.  Security Considerations

  Transfer protocols using XML conformant to the XML Schema in this
  document and offering security properties such as authentication and
  confidentiality SHOULD offer an initial message from the server to
  the client using the <versions> element.  This <versions> element
  SHOULD contain all relevant authentication identifiers in its
  'authenticationId' attribute.  The purpose of providing this initial
  message is to help thwart downgrade attacks.










Newton                      Standards Track                    [Page 10]

RFC 4991       Common Schema for IRIS Transfer Protocols     August 2007


12.  References

12.1.  Normative References

  [1]   The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard, Version 3", ISBN
        0-201-61633-5, 2000, <The Unicode Standard, Version 3>.

  [2]   World Wide Web Consortium, "Extensible Markup Language (XML)
        1.0", W3C XML, February 1998, <http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-
        xml-19980210>.

  [3]   World Wide Web Consortium, "Namespaces in XML", W3C XML
        Namespaces, January 1999, <http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-
        names-19990114>.

  [4]   World Wide Web Consortium, "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes", W3C
        XML Schema, October 2004, <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/>.

  [5]   World Wide Web Consortium, "XML Schema Part 1: Structures", W3C
        XML Schema, October 2004, <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/>.

  [6]   Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
        Levels", RFC 2119, BCP 14, March 1997.

  [7]   Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
        January 2004.

12.2.  Informative References

  [8]   Newton, A. and M. Sanz, "IRIS: The Internet Registry
        Information Service (IRIS) Core Protocol", RFC 3981, January
        2005.

  [9]   Newton, A., "A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the
        Internet Registry Information Service", RFC 4993, August 2007.

  [10]  Newton, A., "XML Pipelining with Chunks for the Internet
        Registry Information Service", RFC 4992, August 2007.













Newton                      Standards Track                    [Page 11]

RFC 4991       Common Schema for IRIS Transfer Protocols     August 2007


Appendix A.  Contributors

  Substantive contributions to this document have been provided by the
  members of the IETF's CRISP Working Group, especially Robert
  Martin-Legene, Milena Caires, and David Blacka.

Author's Address

  Andrew L. Newton
  VeriSign, Inc.
  21345 Ridgetop Circle
  Sterling, VA  20166
  USA

  Phone: +1 703 948 3382
  EMail: [email protected]
  URI:   http://www.verisignlabs.com/


































Newton                      Standards Track                    [Page 12]

RFC 4991       Common Schema for IRIS Transfer Protocols     August 2007


Full Copyright Statement

  Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

  This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
  contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
  retain all their rights.

  This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
  "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
  OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
  THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
  OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
  THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
  WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

  The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
  Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
  pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
  this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
  might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
  made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
  on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
  found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

  Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
  assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
  attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
  such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
  specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
  http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

  The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
  copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
  rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
  this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
  [email protected].

Acknowledgement

  Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
  Internet Society.







Newton                      Standards Track                    [Page 13]