Network Working Group                                       B. Carpenter
Request for Comments: 4048                                           IBM
Category: Informational                                       April 2005


                         RFC 1888 Is Obsolete

Status of This Memo

  This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
  not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
  memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

Abstract

  This document recommends that RFC 1888, on Open Systems
  Interconnection (OSI) Network Service Access Points (NSAPs) and IPv6,
  be reclassified as Historic, as most of it has no further value,
  apart from one section, which is faulty.

Table of Contents

  1.  Introduction .................................................. 1
  2.  Recommendation to Reclassify RFC 1888 ......................... 2
  3.  Security Considerations ....................................... 2
  4.  IANA Considerations ........................................... 2
  5.  Acknowledgements .............................................. 2
  6.  Normative References .......................................... 3
  Author's Address .................................................. 3
  Full Copyright Statement .......................................... 4

1.  Introduction

  [RFC1888] was published as an Experimental RFC in 1996, at an early
  stage in the development of IPv6, when it appeared important to
  consider usage of Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) addressing for
  IPv6.  In Sections 3 through 5, it defines mappings of certain OSI
  Network Service Access Point (NSAP) addresses inside IPv6 addresses,
  and how to carry arbitrary NSAP addresses as IPv6 destination
  options.  However, it also contains significant "health warnings"
  about the difficulty of routing packets in the global Internet using
  such addresses.  As far as is known to the IETF, these address
  mappings have never been seriously used and are not supported by IPv6
  implementations.  Furthermore, the deployment of OSI solutions is not



Carpenter                    Informational                      [Page 1]

RFC 4048                  RFC 1888 Is Obsolete                April 2005


  sufficiently widespread that any change in this situation can be
  expected.

  Additionally, Section 6 of [RFC1888] specifies a mapping of IPv6
  addresses inside OSI NSAP addresses.  This mapping has recently
  aroused some interest: for example, to allow IP addresses to be
  expressed in an Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) context.
  Unfortunately, Section 6 of [RFC1888] contains two errors in its
  usage of OSI Initial Domain Part (IDP) format:

  * first, the text refers to the Internet Code Point (ICP) as a single
    octet, whereas it is correctly a 16-bit field;

  * second, the text states that "[t]he first three octets are an IDP
    in binary format", but [NSAP] states in section A.5.2.1 that "[t]he
    abstract syntax for the IDI is decimal digits" and specifies a
    preferred binary encoding in section A.5.3 "using a semi-octet to
    represent the value of each decimal digit ... , yielding a value in
    the range 0000-1001".

2.  Recommendation to Reclassify RFC 1888

  Due to the lack of use of one of the mappings, and to the errors in
  the documentation of the other, this document recommends that the
  IESG reclassify [RFC1888] as Historic.

  It is assumed that parties who wish to use a mapping of IPv6
  addresses inside OSI NSAP addresses will correct, augment, and
  resubmit Section 6 of [RFC1888] as a separate document.

3.  Security Considerations

  This recommendation has no known impact on the security of the
  Internet.

4.  IANA Considerations

  IANA has marked the IPv6 address prefix 0000 001, reserved for NSAP
  Allocation in [RFC3513], simply as Reserved.

  IANA is holding the registry for "OSI NSAPA Internet Code Point"
  implied by Section 6 of [RFC1888] in abeyance until a replacement for
  that Section is approved for publication.

5.  Acknowledgements

  Scott Brim and Arun Pandey made useful comments on this document.




Carpenter                    Informational                      [Page 2]

RFC 4048                  RFC 1888 Is Obsolete                April 2005


6.  Normative References

  [RFC1888] Bound, J., Carpenter, B., Harrington, D., Houldsworth, J.,
            and A. Lloyd, "OSI NSAPs and IPv6", RFC 1888, August 1996.

  [RFC3513] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "Internet Protocol Version 6
            (IPv6) Addressing Architecture", RFC 3513, April 2003.

  [NSAP]    International Organization for Standardization,
            "Information technology -- Open Systems Interconnection --
            Network service definition", ISO/IEC 8348:2002, 2002.

Author's Address

  Brian E. Carpenter
  IBM Zurich Research Laboratory
  Saeumerstrasse 4 / Postfach
  8803 Rueschlikon
  Switzerland

  EMail: [email protected]






























Carpenter                    Informational                      [Page 3]

RFC 4048                  RFC 1888 Is Obsolete                April 2005


Full Copyright Statement

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

  This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
  contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
  retain all their rights.

  This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
  "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
  OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
  ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
  INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
  INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
  WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

  The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
  Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
  pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
  this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
  might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
  made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
  on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
  found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

  Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
  assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
  attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
  such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
  specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
  http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

  The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
  copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
  rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
  this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
  [email protected].

Acknowledgement

  Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
  Internet Society.







Carpenter                    Informational                      [Page 4]