Network Working Group                                          N. Freed
Request for Comments: 2249                                     Innosoft
Obsoletes: 1566                                                S. Kille
Category: Standards Track                              ISODE Consortium
                                                          January 1998


                         Mail Monitoring MIB


Status of this Memo

  This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
  Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
  improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
  Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
  and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998).  All Rights Reserved.

1.  Introduction

  This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
  for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
  Specifically, this memo extends the basic Network Services Monitoring
  MIB [8] to allow monitoring of Message Transfer Agents (MTAs). It may
  also be used to monitor MTA components within gateways.

2.  Table of Contents

  1 Introduction .............................................    1
  2 Table of Contents ........................................    1
  3 The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework ..................    2
  3.1 Object Definitions .....................................    2
  4 Message Flow Model .......................................    2
  5 MTA Objects ..............................................    3
  6 Definitions ..............................................    4
  7 Changes made since RFC 1566 ..............................   25
  8 Acknowledgements .........................................   26
  9 References ...............................................   26
  10 Security Considerations .................................   27
  11 Author and Chair Addresses ..............................   27
  12 Full Copyright Statement ................................   28






Freed & Kille               Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


3.  The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework

  The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework consists of seven major
  components. They are:

  o    RFC 1902 [1] which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for
       describing and naming objects for the purpose of management.

  o    RFC 1903 [2] defines textual conventions for SNMPv2.

  o    RFC 1904 [3] defines conformance statements for SNMPv2.

  o    RFC 1905 [4] defines  transport mappings for SNMPv2.

  o    RFC 1906 [5] defines the protocol operations used for network
       access to managed objects.

  o    RFC 1907 [6] defines the Management Information Base for SNMPv2.

  o    RFC 1908 [7] specifies coexistance between SNMP and SNMPv2.

  The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of
  experimentation and evaluation.

3.1.  Object Definitions

  Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
  the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are
  defined using the subset of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1)
  defined in the SMI.  In particular, each object type is named by an
  OBJECT IDENTIFIER, an administratively assigned name. The object type
  together with an object instance serves to uniquely identify a
  specific instantiation of the object.  For human convenience, we
  often use a textual string, termed the descriptor, to refer to the
  object type.

4.  Message Flow Model

  A general model of message flow inside an MTA has to be presented
  before a MIB can be described. Generally speaking, message flow is
  modelled as occuring in four steps:

   (1)   Messages are received by the MTA from User Agents, Message
         Stores, other MTAs, and gateways.

   (2)   The "next hop" for the each message is determined. This is
         simply the destination the message is to be transmitted to; it
         may or may not be the final destination of the message.



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


         Multiple "next hops" may exist for a single message (as a
         result of either having multiple recipients or distribution
         list expansion); this may make it necessary to duplicate
         messages.

   (3)   If necessary messages are converted into the format that's
         appropriate for the next hop. Conversion operations may be
         successful or unsuccessful.

   (4)   Messages are transmitted to the appropriate destination, which
         may be a User Agent, Message Store, another MTA, or gateway.

  Storage of messages in the MTA occurs at some point during this
  process.  However, it is important to note that storage may occur at
  different and possibly even multiple points during this process. For
  example, some MTAs expand messages into multiple copies as they are
  received. In this case (1), (2), and (3) may all occur prior to
  storage. Other MTAs store messages precisely as they are received and
  perform all expansions and conversions during retransmission
  processing. So here only (1) occurs prior to storage.  This leads to
  situations where, in general, a measurement of messages received may
  not equal a measurement of messages in store, or a measurement of
  messages stored may not equal a measurement of messages
  retransmitted, or both.

5.  MTA Objects

  If there are one or more MTAs on the host, the following MIB may be
  used to monitor them. Any number of the MTAs on a single host or
  group of hosts may be monitored. Each MTA is dealt with as a separate
  network service and has its own applTable entry in the Network
  Services Monitoring MIB.

  The MIB described in this document covers only the portion which is
  specific to the monitoring of MTAs. The network service related part
  of the MIB is covered in a separate document [8].

  This MIB defines four tables. The first of these contains per-MTA
  information that isn't specific to any particular part of MTA. The
  second breaks each MTA down into a collection of separate components
  called groups. Groups are described in detail in the comments
  embedded in the MIB below. The third table provides a means of
  correlating associations tracked by the network services MIB with
  specific groups within different MTAs. Finally, the fourth table
  provides a means of tracking any errors encountered during the
  operation of the MTA. The first two tables must be implemented to
  conform with this MIB; the last two are optional.




Freed & Kille               Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


6.  Definitions

MTA-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

IMPORTS
   OBJECT-TYPE, Counter32, Gauge32, MODULE-IDENTITY, mib-2
     FROM SNMPv2-SMI
   DisplayString, TimeInterval
     FROM SNMPv2-TC
   MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP
     FROM SNMPv2-CONF
   applIndex, URLString
     FROM NETWORK-SERVICES-MIB;

mta MODULE-IDENTITY
   LAST-UPDATED "9708170000Z"
   ORGANIZATION "IETF Mail and Directory Management Working Group"
   CONTACT-INFO
     "        Ned Freed

      Postal: Innosoft International, Inc.
              1050 Lakes Drive
              West Covina, CA 91790
              US

      Tel: +1 626 919 3600
      Fax: +1 626 919 3614

      E-Mail: [email protected]"
   DESCRIPTION
     "The MIB module describing Message Transfer Agents (MTAs)"
   REVISION "9311280000Z"
   DESCRIPTION
     "The original version of this MIB was published in RFC 1566"
   ::= {mib-2 28}

mtaTable OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF MtaEntry
   MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The table holding information specific to an MTA."
   ::= {mta 1}

mtaStatusCode OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX INTEGER (4000000..5999999)
   MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
   STATUS current



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


   DESCRIPTION
     "An index capable of representing an Enhanced Mail System
      Status Code.  Enhanced Mail System Status Codes are
      defined in RFC 1893 [14].  These codes have the form

          class.subject.detail

      Here 'class' is either 2, 4, or 5 and both 'subject' and
      'detail'  are integers in the range 0..999. Given a status
      code the corresponding index value is defined to be
      ((class * 1000) + subject) * 1000 + detail.  Both SMTP
      error response codes and X.400 reason and diagnostic codes
      can be mapped into these codes, resulting in a namespace
      capable of describing most error conditions a mail system
      encounters in a generic yet detailed way."
   ::= {mta 6}

mtaEntry OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX MtaEntry
   MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The entry associated with each MTA."
   INDEX {applIndex}
   ::= {mtaTable 1}

MtaEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
   mtaReceivedMessages
     Counter32,
   mtaStoredMessages
     Gauge32,
   mtaTransmittedMessages
     Counter32,
   mtaReceivedVolume
     Counter32,
   mtaStoredVolume
     Gauge32,
   mtaTransmittedVolume
     Counter32,
   mtaReceivedRecipients
     Counter32,
   mtaStoredRecipients
     Gauge32,
   mtaTransmittedRecipients
     Counter32,
   mtaSuccessfulConvertedMessages
     Counter32,
   mtaFailedConvertedMessages



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


     Counter32,
   mtaLoopsDetected
     Counter32
}

mtaReceivedMessages OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The number of messages received since MTA initialization.
      This includes messages transmitted to this MTA from other
      MTAs as well as messages that have been submitted to the
      MTA directly by end-users or applications."
   ::= {mtaEntry 1}

mtaStoredMessages OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Gauge32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total number of messages currently stored in the MTA.
      This includes messages that are awaiting transmission to
      some other MTA or are waiting for delivery to an end-user
      or application."
   ::= {mtaEntry 2}

mtaTransmittedMessages OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The number of messages transmitted since MTA initialization.
      This includes messages that were transmitted to some other
      MTA or are waiting for delivery to an end-user or
      application."
   ::= {mtaEntry 3}

mtaReceivedVolume OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   UNITS "K-octets"
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total volume of messages received since MTA
      initialization, measured in kilo-octets.  This volume should
      include all transferred data that is logically above the mail
      transport protocol level.  For example, an SMTP-based MTA



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                     [Page 6]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


      should use the number of kilo-octets in the message header
      and body, while an X.400-based MTA should use the number of
      kilo-octets of P2 data.  This includes messages transmitted
      to this MTA from other MTAs as well as messages that have
      been submitted to the MTA directly by end-users or
      applications."
   ::= {mtaEntry 4}

mtaStoredVolume OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Gauge32
   UNITS "K-octets"
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total volume of messages currently stored in the MTA,
      measured in kilo-octets.  This volume should include all
      stored data that is logically above the mail transport
      protocol level.  For example, an SMTP-based MTA should
      use the number of kilo-octets in the message header and
      body, while an X.400-based MTA would use the number of
      kilo-octets of P2 data.  This includes messages that are
      awaiting transmission to some other MTA or are waiting
      for delivery to an end-user or application."
   ::= {mtaEntry 5}

mtaTransmittedVolume OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   UNITS "K-octets"
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total volume of messages transmitted since MTA
      initialization, measured in kilo-octets.  This volume should
      include all transferred data that is logically above the mail
      transport protocol level.  For example, an SMTP-based MTA
      should use the number of kilo-octets in the message header
      and body, while an X.400-based MTA should use the number of
      kilo-octets of P2 data.  This includes messages that were
      transmitted to some other MTA or are waiting for delivery
      to an end-user or application."
   ::= {mtaEntry 6}

mtaReceivedRecipients OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total number of recipients specified in all messages



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                     [Page 7]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


      received since MTA initialization.  Recipients this MTA
      has no responsibility for, i.e. inactive envelope
      recipients or ones referred to in message headers,
      should not be counted even if information about such
      recipients is available.  This includes messages
      transmitted to this MTA from other MTAs as well as
      messages that have been submitted to the MTA directly
      by end-users or applications."
   ::= {mtaEntry 7}

mtaStoredRecipients OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Gauge32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total number of recipients specified in all messages
      currently stored in the MTA.  Recipients this MTA has no
      responsibility for, i.e. inactive envelope recipients or
      ones referred to in message headers, should not be
      counted.  This includes messages that are awaiting
      transmission to some other MTA or are waiting for
      delivery to an end-user or application."
   ::= {mtaEntry 8}

mtaTransmittedRecipients OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total number of recipients specified in all messages
      transmitted since MTA initialization.  Recipients this
      MTA had no responsibility for, i.e. inactive envelope
      recipients or ones referred to in message headers,
      should not be counted.  This includes messages that were
      transmitted to some other MTA or are waiting for
      delivery to an end-user or application."
   ::= {mtaEntry 9}

mtaSuccessfulConvertedMessages OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The number of messages that have been successfully
      converted from one form to another since MTA
      initialization."
   ::= {mtaEntry 10}




Freed & Kille               Standards Track                     [Page 8]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


mtaFailedConvertedMessages OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The number of messages for which an unsuccessful
      attempt was made to convert them from one form to
      another since MTA initialization."
   ::= {mtaEntry 11}

mtaLoopsDetected OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "A message loop is defined as a situation where the MTA
      decides that a given message will never be delivered to
      one or more recipients and instead will continue to
      loop endlessly through one or more MTAs.  This variable
      counts the number of times the MTA has detected such a
      situation since MTA initialization. Note that the
      mechanism MTAs use to detect loops (e.g. trace field
      counting, count of references to this MTA in a trace
      field, examination of DNS or other directory information,
      etc.), the level at which loops are detected (e.g. per
      message, per recipient, per directory entry, etc.), and
      the handling of a loop once it is detected (e.g. looping
      messages are held, looping messages are bounced or sent
      to the postmaster, messages that the MTA knows will loop
      won't be accepted, etc.) vary widely from one MTA to the
      next and cannot be inferred from this variable."
   ::= {mtaEntry 12}

-- MTAs typically group inbound reception, queue storage, and
-- outbound transmission in some way, rather than accounting for
-- such operations only across the MTA as a whole. In the most
-- extreme case separate information will be maintained for each
-- different entity that receives messages and for each entity
-- the MTA stores messages for and delivers messages to.  Other
-- MTAs may elect to treat all reception equally, all queue
-- storage equally, all deliveries equally, or some combination
-- of this. Overlapped groupings are also possible, where an MTA
-- decomposes its traffic in different ways for different
-- purposes.

-- In any case, a grouping abstraction is an extremely useful for
-- breaking down the activities of an MTA. For purposes of
-- labelling this will be called a "group" in this MIB.



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                     [Page 9]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


-- Each group contains all the variables needed to monitor all
-- aspects of an MTA's operation.  However, the fact that all
-- groups contain all possible variables does not imply that all
-- groups must use all possible variables. For example, a single
-- group might be used to monitor only one kind of event (inbound
-- processing, outbound processing, or storage). In this sort of
-- configuration all unused counters would be inaccessible; e.g.,
-- returning either a noSuchName error (for an SNMPv1 get), or a
-- noSuchInstance exception (for an SNMPv2 get).

-- Groups can be created at any time after MTA initialization. Once
-- a group is created it should not be deleted or its mtaGroupIndex
-- changed unless the MTA is reinitialized.

-- Groups are not necessarily mutually exclusive. A given event may
-- be recorded by more than one group, a message may be seen as
-- stored by more than one group, and so on.  Groups should be all
-- inclusive, however: if groups are implemented all aspects of an
-- MTA's operation should be registered in at least one group. This
-- freedom lets implementors use different sets of groups to
-- provide differents "views" of an MTA.

-- The possibility of overlap between groups means that summing
-- variables across groups may not produce values equal to those in
-- the mtaTable. mtaTable should always provide accurate information
-- about the MTA as a whole.

-- The term "channel" is often used in MTA implementations; channels
-- are usually, but not always, equivalent to a group. However,
-- this MIB does not use the term "channel" because there is no
-- requirement that an MTA supporting this MIB has to map its
-- "channel" abstraction one-to-one onto the MIB's group abstration.

-- An MTA may create a group or group of groups at any time. Once
-- created, however, an MTA cannot delete an entry for a group from
-- the group table.  Deletation is only allowed when the MTA is
-- reinitialized, and is not required even then.  This restriction
-- is imposed so that monitoring agents can rely on group
-- assignments being consistent across multiple query operations.

-- Groups may be laid out so as to form a hierarchical arrangement,
-- with some groups acting as subgroups for other groups.
-- Alternately, disjoint groups of groups may be used to provide
-- different sorts of "snapshots" of MTA operation.  The
-- mtaGroupHierarchy variable provides an indication of how each
-- group fits into the overall arrangement being used.

mtaGroupTable OBJECT-TYPE



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 10]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


   SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF MtaGroupEntry
   MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The table holding information specific to each MTA group."
   ::= {mta 2}

mtaGroupEntry OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX MtaGroupEntry
   MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The entry associated with each MTA group."
   INDEX {applIndex, mtaGroupIndex}
   ::= {mtaGroupTable 1}

MtaGroupEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
   mtaGroupIndex
       INTEGER,
   mtaGroupReceivedMessages
       Counter32,
   mtaGroupRejectedMessages
       Counter32,
   mtaGroupStoredMessages
       Gauge32,
   mtaGroupTransmittedMessages
       Counter32,
   mtaGroupReceivedVolume
       Counter32,
   mtaGroupStoredVolume
       Gauge32,
   mtaGroupTransmittedVolume
       Counter32,
   mtaGroupReceivedRecipients
       Counter32,
   mtaGroupStoredRecipients
       Gauge32,
   mtaGroupTransmittedRecipients
       Counter32,
   mtaGroupOldestMessageStored
       TimeInterval,
   mtaGroupInboundAssociations
       Gauge32,
   mtaGroupOutboundAssociations
       Gauge32,
   mtaGroupAccumulatedInboundAssociations
       Counter32,
   mtaGroupAccumulatedOutboundAssociations



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 11]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


       Counter32,
   mtaGroupLastInboundActivity
       TimeInterval,
   mtaGroupLastOutboundActivity
       TimeInterval,
   mtaGroupLastOutboundAssociationAttempt
       TimeInterval,
   mtaGroupRejectedInboundAssociations
       Counter32,
   mtaGroupFailedOutboundAssociations
       Counter32,
   mtaGroupInboundRejectionReason
       DisplayString,
   mtaGroupOutboundConnectFailureReason
       DisplayString,
   mtaGroupScheduledRetry
       TimeInterval,
   mtaGroupMailProtocol
       OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
   mtaGroupName
       DisplayString,
   mtaGroupSuccessfulConvertedMessages
       Counter32,
   mtaGroupFailedConvertedMessages
       Counter32,
   mtaGroupDescription
       DisplayString,
   mtaGroupURL
       URLString,
   mtaGroupCreationTime
       TimeInterval,
   mtaGroupHierarchy
       INTEGER,
   mtaGroupOldestMessageId
       DisplayString,
   mtaGroupLoopsDetected
       Counter32
}

mtaGroupIndex OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX INTEGER (1..2147483647)
   MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The index associated with a group for a given MTA."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 1}

mtaGroupReceivedMessages OBJECT-TYPE



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 12]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The number of messages received to this group since
      group creation."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 2}

mtaGroupRejectedMessages OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The number of messages rejected by this group since
      group creation."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 3}

mtaGroupStoredMessages OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Gauge32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total number of messages currently stored in this
      group's queue."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 4}

mtaGroupTransmittedMessages OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The number of messages transmitted by this group since
      group creation."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 5}

mtaGroupReceivedVolume OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   UNITS "K-octets"
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total volume of messages received to this group since
      group creation, measured in kilo-octets.  This volume
      should include all transferred data that is logically above
      the mail transport protocol level.  For example, an
      SMTP-based MTA should use the number of kilo-octets in the
      message header and body, while an X.400-based MTA should use
      the number of kilo-octets of P2 data."



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 13]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 6}

mtaGroupStoredVolume OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Gauge32
   UNITS "K-octets"
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total volume of messages currently stored in this
      group's queue, measured in kilo-octets.  This volume should
      include all stored data that is logically above the mail
      transport protocol level.  For example, an SMTP-based
      MTA should use the number of kilo-octets in the message
      header and body, while an X.400-based MTA would use the
      number of kilo-octets of P2 data."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 7}

mtaGroupTransmittedVolume OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   UNITS "K-octets"
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total volume of messages transmitted by this group
      since group creation, measured in kilo-octets.  This
      volume should include all transferred data that is logically
      above the mail transport protocol level.  For example, an
      SMTP-based MTA should use the number of kilo-octets in the
      message header and body, while an X.400-based MTA should use
      the number of kilo-octets of P2 data."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 8}

mtaGroupReceivedRecipients OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total number of recipients specified in all messages
      received to this group since group creation.
      Recipients this MTA has no responsibility for should not
      be counted."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 9}

mtaGroupStoredRecipients OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Gauge32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 14]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


     "The total number of recipients specified in all messages
      currently stored in this group's queue.  Recipients this
      MTA has no responsibility for should not be counted."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 10}

mtaGroupTransmittedRecipients OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total number of recipients specified in all messages
      transmitted by this group since group creation.
      Recipients this MTA had no responsibility for should not
      be counted."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 11}

mtaGroupOldestMessageStored OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX TimeInterval
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "Time since the oldest message in this group's queue was
      placed in the queue."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 12}

mtaGroupInboundAssociations OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Gauge32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The number of current associations to the group, where the
      group is the responder."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 13}

mtaGroupOutboundAssociations OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Gauge32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The number of current associations to the group, where the
     group is the initiator."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 14}

mtaGroupAccumulatedInboundAssociations OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 15]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


     "The total number of associations to the group since
     group creation, where the MTA was the responder."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 15}

mtaGroupAccumulatedOutboundAssociations OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total number of associations from the group since
      group creation, where the MTA was the initiator."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 16}

mtaGroupLastInboundActivity OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX TimeInterval
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "Time since the last time that this group had an active
     inbound association for purposes of message reception."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 17}

mtaGroupLastOutboundActivity OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX TimeInterval
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "Time since the last time that this group had a
      successful outbound association for purposes of
      message delivery."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 18}

mtaGroupLastOutboundAssociationAttempt OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX TimeInterval
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "Time since the last time that this group attempted
      to make an outbound association for purposes of
      message delivery."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 34}

mtaGroupRejectedInboundAssociations OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total number of inbound associations the group has



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 16]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


     rejected, since group creation.  Rejected associations
     are not counted in the accumulated association totals."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 19}

mtaGroupFailedOutboundAssociations OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The total number associations where the group was the
     initiator and association establishment has failed,
     since group creation.  Failed associations are
     not counted in the accumulated association totals."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 20}

mtaGroupInboundRejectionReason OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX DisplayString
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The failure reason, if any, for the last association this
     group refused to respond to. An empty string indicates that
     the last attempt was successful.  If no association attempt
     has been made since the MTA was initialized the value
     should be 'never'."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 21}

mtaGroupOutboundConnectFailureReason OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX DisplayString
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The failure reason, if any, for the last association attempt
     this group initiated. An empty string indicates that the last
     attempt was successful.  If no association attempt has been
     made since the MTA was initialized the value should be
     'never'."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 22}

mtaGroupScheduledRetry OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX TimeInterval
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The time when this group is scheduled to next attempt to
      make an association."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 23}




Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 17]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


mtaGroupMailProtocol OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "An identification of the protocol being used by this group.
     For an group employing OSI protocols, this will be the
     Application Context.  For Internet applications, the IANA
     maintains a registry of the OIDs which correspond to well-known
     message transfer protocols.  If the application protocol is
     not listed in the registry, an OID value of the form
     {applTCPProtoID port} or {applUDProtoID port} are used for
     TCP-based and UDP-based protocols, respectively.  In either
     case 'port' corresponds to the primary port number being
     used by the group.  applTCPProtoID and applUDPProtoID are
     defined in [8]."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 24}

mtaGroupName OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX DisplayString
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "A descriptive name for the group. If this group connects to
      a single remote MTA this should be the name of that MTA. If
      this in turn is an Internet MTA this should be the domain
      name.  For an OSI MTA it should be the string encoded
      distinguished name of the managed object using the format
      defined in RFC 1779 [9]. For X.400(1984) MTAs which do not
      have a Distinguished Name, the RFC 1327 [12] syntax
      'mta in globalid' should be used."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 25}

mtaGroupSuccessfulConvertedMessages OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The number of messages that have been successfully
      converted from one form to another in this group
      since group creation."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 26}

mtaGroupFailedConvertedMessages OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 18]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


     "The number of messages for which an unsuccessful
      attempt was made to convert them from one form to
      another in this group since group creation."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 27}

mtaGroupDescription OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX DisplayString
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "A description of the group's purpose.  This information is
      intended to identify the group in a status display."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 28}

mtaGroupURL OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX URLString
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "A URL pointing to a description of the group.  This
      information is intended to identify and briefly describe
      the group in a status display."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 29}

mtaGroupCreationTime OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX TimeInterval
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "Time since this group was first created."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 30}

mtaGroupHierarchy OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX INTEGER (-2147483648..2147483647)
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "Describes how this group fits into the hierarchy. A
      positive value is interpreted as an mtaGroupIndex
      value for some other group whose variables include
      those of this group (and usually others). A negative
      value is interpreted as a group collection code: Groups
      with common negative hierarchy values comprise one
      particular breakdown of MTA activity as a whole. A
      zero value means that this MIB implementation doesn't
      implement hierarchy indicators and thus the overall
      group hierarchy cannot be determined."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 31}



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 19]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


mtaGroupOldestMessageId OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX DisplayString
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "Message ID of the oldest message in the group's queue.
      Whenever possible this should be in the form of an
      RFC 822 [13] msg-id; X.400 may convert X.400 message
      identifiers to this form by following the rules laid
      out in RFC1327 [12]."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 32}

mtaGroupLoopsDetected OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "A message loop is defined as a situation where the MTA
      decides that a given message will never be delivered to
      one or more recipients and instead will continue to
      loop endlessly through one or more MTAs.  This variable
      counts the number of times the MTA has detected such a
      situation in conjunction with something associated with
      this group since group creation.  Note that the
      mechanism MTAs use to detect loops (e.g. trace field
      counting, count of references to this MTA in a trace
      field, examination of DNS or other directory information,
      etc.), the level at which loops are detected (e.g. per
      message, per recipient, per directory entry, etc.), and
      the handling of a loop once it is detected (e.g. looping
      messages are held, looping messages are bounced or sent
      to the postmaster, messages that the MTA knows will loop
      won't be accepted, etc.) vary widely from one MTA to the
      next and cannot be inferred from this variable."
   ::= {mtaGroupEntry 33}

-- The mtaGroupAssociationTable provides a means of correlating
-- entries in the network services association table with the
-- MTA group responsible for the association.


mtaGroupAssociationTable OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF MtaGroupAssociationEntry
   MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The table holding information regarding the associations
      for each MTA group."



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 20]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


   ::= {mta 3}

mtaGroupAssociationEntry OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX MtaGroupAssociationEntry
   MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The entry holding information regarding the associations
      for each MTA group."
   INDEX {applIndex, mtaGroupIndex, mtaGroupAssociationIndex}
   ::= {mtaGroupAssociationTable 1}

MtaGroupAssociationEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
   mtaGroupAssociationIndex
       INTEGER
}

mtaGroupAssociationIndex OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX INTEGER (1..2147483647)
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "Reference into association table to allow correlation of
      this group's active associations with the association table."
   ::= {mtaGroupAssociationEntry 1}

-- The mtaGroupErrorTable gives each group a way of tallying
-- the specific errors it has encountered.  The mechanism
-- defined here uses RFC 1893 [14] status codes to identify
-- various specific errors. There are also classes for generic
-- errors of various sorts, and the entire mechanism is also
-- extensible, in that new error codes can be defined at any
-- time.

mtaGroupErrorTable OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF MtaGroupErrorEntry
   MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The table holding information regarding accumulated errors
      for each MTA group."
   ::= {mta 5}

mtaGroupErrorEntry OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX MtaGroupErrorEntry
   MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 21]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


     "The entry holding information regarding accumulated
      errors for each MTA group."
   INDEX {applIndex, mtaGroupIndex, mtaStatusCode}
   ::= {mtaGroupErrorTable 1}

MtaGroupErrorEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
   mtaGroupInboundErrorCount
       Counter32,
   mtaGroupInternalErrorCount
       Counter32,
   mtaGroupOutboundErrorCount
       Counter32
}

mtaGroupInboundErrorCount OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "Count of the number of errors of a given type that have
      been accumulated in assocation with a particular group
      while processing incoming messages. In the case of SMTP
      these will typically be errors reporting by an SMTP
      server to the remote client; in the case of X.400
      these will typically be errors encountered while
      processing an incoming message."
   ::= {mtaGroupErrorEntry 1}


mtaGroupInternalErrorCount OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "Count of the number of errors of a given type that have
      been accumulated in assocation with a particular group
      during internal MTA processing."
   ::= {mtaGroupErrorEntry 2}

mtaGroupOutboundErrorCount OBJECT-TYPE
   SYNTAX Counter32
   MAX-ACCESS read-only
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "Count of the number of errors of a given type that have
      been accumulated in assocation with a particular group's
      outbound connection activities. In the case of an SMTP
      client these will typically be errors reported while



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 22]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


      attempting to contact or while communicating with the
      remote SMTP server. In the case of X.400 these will
      typically be errors encountered while constructing
      or attempting to deliver an outgoing message."
   ::= {mtaGroupErrorEntry 3}

-- Conformance information

mtaConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {mta 4}

mtaGroups      OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {mtaConformance 1}
mtaCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {mtaConformance 2}

-- Compliance statements

mtaCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The compliance statement for SNMPv2 entities which
      implement the Mail Monitoring MIB for basic
      monitoring of MTAs."
   MODULE  -- this module
     MANDATORY-GROUPS {mtaGroup}
   ::= {mtaCompliances 1}

mtaAssocCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The compliance statement for SNMPv2 entities which
      implement the Mail Monitoring MIB for monitoring of
      MTAs and their associations."
   MODULE  -- this module
     MANDATORY-GROUPS {mtaGroup, mtaAssocGroup}
   ::= {mtaCompliances 2}

mtaErrorCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "The compliance statement for SNMPv2 entities which
      implement the Mail Monitoring MIB for monitoring of
      MTAs and detailed errors."
   MODULE  -- this module
     MANDATORY-GROUPS {mtaGroup, mtaErrorGroup}
   ::= {mtaCompliances 3}

mtaFullCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 23]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


     "The compliance statement for SNMPv2 entities which
      implement the full Mail Monitoring MIB for monitoring
      of MTAs, associations, and detailed errors."
   MODULE  -- this module
     MANDATORY-GROUPS {mtaGroup, mtaAssocGroup, mtaErrorGroup}
   ::= {mtaCompliances 4}

-- Units of conformance

mtaGroup OBJECT-GROUP
   OBJECTS {
     mtaReceivedMessages, mtaStoredMessages,
     mtaTransmittedMessages, mtaReceivedVolume, mtaStoredVolume,
     mtaTransmittedVolume, mtaReceivedRecipients,
     mtaStoredRecipients, mtaTransmittedRecipients,
     mtaSuccessfulConvertedMessages, mtaFailedConvertedMessages,
     mtaGroupReceivedMessages, mtaGroupRejectedMessages,
     mtaGroupStoredMessages, mtaGroupTransmittedMessages,
     mtaGroupReceivedVolume, mtaGroupStoredVolume,
     mtaGroupTransmittedVolume, mtaGroupReceivedRecipients,
     mtaGroupStoredRecipients, mtaGroupTransmittedRecipients,
     mtaGroupOldestMessageStored, mtaGroupInboundAssociations,
     mtaGroupOutboundAssociations, mtaLoopsDetected,
     mtaGroupAccumulatedInboundAssociations,
     mtaGroupAccumulatedOutboundAssociations,
     mtaGroupLastInboundActivity, mtaGroupLastOutboundActivity,
     mtaGroupLastOutboundAssociationAttempt,
     mtaGroupRejectedInboundAssociations,
     mtaGroupFailedOutboundAssociations,
     mtaGroupInboundRejectionReason,
     mtaGroupOutboundConnectFailureReason,
     mtaGroupScheduledRetry, mtaGroupMailProtocol, mtaGroupName,
     mtaGroupSuccessfulConvertedMessages,
     mtaGroupFailedConvertedMessages, mtaGroupDescription,
     mtaGroupURL, mtaGroupCreationTime, mtaGroupHierarchy,
     mtaGroupOldestMessageId, mtaGroupLoopsDetected}
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "A collection of objects providing basic monitoring of MTAs."
   ::= {mtaGroups 1}

mtaAssocGroup OBJECT-GROUP
   OBJECTS {
     mtaGroupAssociationIndex}
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "A collection of objects providing monitoring of MTA
      associations."



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 24]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


   ::= {mtaGroups 2}

mtaErrorGroup OBJECT-GROUP
   OBJECTS {
     mtaGroupInboundErrorCount, mtaGroupInternalErrorCount,
     mtaGroupOutboundErrorCount}
   STATUS current
   DESCRIPTION
     "A collection of objects providing monitoring of
      detailed MTA errors."
   ::= {mtaGroups 3}

END

7.  Changes made since RFC 1566

  The only changes made to this document since it was issued as RFC
  1566 [11] are the following:

   (1)   A number of DESCRIPTION fields have been reworded, hopefully
         making them clearer.

   (2)   mtaGroupDescription and mtaGroupURL fields have been added.
         These fields are intended to identify and describe the MTA and
         the various MTA groups.

   (3)   The time since the last outbound association attempt is now
         distinct from the time since the last successfuol outbound
         association attempt.

   (4)   Conversion operation counters have been added.

   (5)   A mechanism to explicitly describe group hierarchies has been
         added.

   (6)   A mechanism to count specific sorts of errors has been added.

   (7)   A field for the ID of the oldest message in a group's queue
         has been added.

   (8)   Per-MTA and per-group message loop counters have been added.

   (9)   A new table has been added to keep track of any errors an MTA
         encounters.







Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 25]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


8.  Acknowledgements

  This document is a work product of the Mail and Directory Management
  (MADMAN) Working Group of the IETF. It is based on an earlier MIB
  designed by S. Kille, T. Lenggenhager, D. Partain, and W. Yeong. The
  Electronic Mail Association's TSC committee was instrumental in
  providing feedback on and suggesting enhancements to RFC 1566 [11]
  that have led to the present document.

9.  References

  [1]  SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and
       S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information for Version
       2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1902,
       January 1996.

  [2]  SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and
       S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for Version 2 of the Simple
       Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1903, January 1996.

  [3]  SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and
       S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for Version 2 of the
       Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1904, January
       1996.

  [4]  SNMPv2 Working Grou, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and
       S. Waldbusser, "Protocol Operations for Version 2 of the Simple
       Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1905, January 1996.

  [5]  SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and
       S. Waldbusser, "Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple
       Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1906, January 1996.

  [6]  SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and
       S. Waldbusser, "Management Information Base for Version 2 of the
       Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1907, January
       1996.

  [7]  SNMPv2 Working Group, Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and
       S. Waldbusser, "Coexistence between Version 1 and Version 2 of
       the Internet-standard Network Management Framework", RFC 1908,
       January 1996.

  [8]  Freed, N., and S. Kille, "The Network Services Monitoring MIB",
       RFC 2248, January 1998.

  [9]  Kille, S., "A String Representation of Distinguished Names", RFC
       1779, March 1995.



Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 26]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


  [10] Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L. and M. McCahill, Uniform Resource
       Locators (URL)", RFC 1738, December 1994.

  [11] Freed, N. and S. Kille, "Mail Monitoring MIB", RFC 1566, January
       1994.

  [12] Kille, S., "Mapping between X.400(1988) / ISO 10021 and RFC
       822", RFC 1327, May 1992.

  [13] Crocker, D., "Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet Text
       Message", RFC 822, August 1982.

  [14] Vaudreuil, G., "Enhanced Mail System Status Codes", RFC 1893,
       January 1996.

10.  Security Considerations

  This MIB does not offer write access, and as such cannot be used to
  actively attack a system. However, this MIB does provide passive
  information about the existance, type, and configuration of
  applications on a given host that could potentially indicate some
  sort of vulnerability. Finally, the information MIB provides about
  network usage could be used to analyze network traffic patterns.

11.  Author and Chair Addresses

  Ned Freed
  Innosoft International, Inc.
  1050 Lakes Drive
  West Covina, CA 91790
  USA

  Phone: +1 626 919 3600
  Fax: +1 626 919 3614
  EMail: [email protected]


  Steve Kille, MADMAN WG Chair
  ISODE Consortium
  The Dome, The Square
  Richmond TW9 1DT
  UK

  Phone: +44 181 332 9091
  EMail: [email protected]






Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 27]

RFC 2249                  Mail Monitoring MIB               January 1998


12.  Full Copyright Statement

  Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved.

  This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished  to
  others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise  explain it
  or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied,  published
  and distributed, in whole or in part, without  restriction of any
  kind, provided that the above copyright notice  and this paragraph
  are included on all such copies and derivative  works.  However, this
  document itself may not be modified in any  way, such as by removing
  the copyright notice or references to the  Internet Society or other
  Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
  developing Internet standards in which case the  procedures for
  copyrights defined in the Internet Standards  process must be
  followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
  English.

  The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
  revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

  This document and the information contained herein is provided on  an
  "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET  ENGINEERING
  TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR  IMPLIED, INCLUDING
  BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF  THE INFORMATION
  HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
  MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
  RPO























Freed & Kille               Standards Track                    [Page 28]