Network Working Group                                         P. McMahon
Request for Comments: 1961                                           ICL
Category: Standards Track                                      June 1996


          GSS-API Authentication Method for SOCKS Version 5

Status of this Memo

  This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
  Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
  improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
  Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
  and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Table of Contents

        1. Purpose ............................................ 1
        2. Introduction ....................................... 1
        3. GSS-API Security Context Establishment ............. 2
        4. GSS-API Protection-level Options ................... 5
        5. GSS-API Per-message Protection ..................... 7
        6. GSS-API Security Context Termination ............... 8
        7. References ......................................... 8
        8. Acknowledgments .................................... 8
        9. Security Considerations ............................ 8
        10. Author's Address .................................. 9

1. Purpose

  The protocol specification for SOCKS Version 5 specifies a
  generalized framework for the use of arbitrary authentication
  protocols in the initial SOCKS connection setup.  This document
  provides the specification for the SOCKS V5 GSS-API authentication
  protocol, and defines a GSS-API-based encapsulation for provision of
  integrity, authentication and optional confidentiality.

2. Introduction

  GSS-API provides an abstract interface which provides security
  services for use in distributed applications, but isolates callers
  from specific security mechanisms and implementations.

  GSS-API peers achieve interoperability by establishing a common
  security mechanism for security context establishment - either
  through administrative action, or through negotiation.  GSS-API is
  specified in [RFC 1508], and [RFC 1509].  This specification is
  intended for use with implementations of GSS-API, and the emerging



McMahon                     Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 1961          GSS-API Authentication for SOCKS V5          June 1996


  GSS-API V2 specification.

  The approach for use of GSS-API in SOCKS V5 is to authenticate the
  client and server by successfully establishing a GSS-API security
  context - such that the GSS-API encapsulates any negotiation protocol
  for mechanism selection, and the agreement of security service
  options.

  The GSS-API enables the context initiator to know what security
  services the target supports for the chosen mechanism.  The required
  level of protection is then agreed by negotiation.

  The GSS-API per-message protection calls are subsequently used to
  encapsulate any further TCP and UDP traffic between client and
  server.

3. GSS-API Security Context Establishment

3.1 Preparation

  Prior to use of GSS-API primitives, the client and server should be
  locally authenticated, and have established default GSS-API
  credentials.

  The client should call gss_import_name to obtain an internal
  representation of the server name.  For maximal portability the
  default name_type GSS_C_NULL_OID should be used to specify the
  default name space, and the input name_string should treated by the
  client's code as an opaque name-space specific input.

  For example, when using Kerberos V5 naming, the imported name may be
  of the form "SERVICE:socks@socks_server_hostname" where
  "socks_server_hostname" is the fully qualified host name of the
  server with all letters in lower case. Other mechanisms may, however,
  have different name forms, so the client should not make assumptions
  about the name syntax.

3.2 Client Context Establishment

  The client should then call gss_init_sec_context, typically passing:

        GSS_C_NO_CREDENTIAL into cred_handle to specify the default
        credential (for initiator usage),

        GSS_C_NULL_OID into mech_type to specify the default
        mechanism,





McMahon                     Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 1961          GSS-API Authentication for SOCKS V5          June 1996


        GSS_C_NO_CONTEXT into context_handle to specify a NULL
        context (initially), and,

        the previously imported server name into target_name.

  The client must also specify its requirements for replay protection,
  delegation, and sequence protection via the gss_init_sec_context
  req_flags parameter.  It is required by this specification that the
  client always requests these service options (i.e. passes
  GSS_C_MUTUAL_FLAG | GSS_C_REPLAY_FLAG | GSS_C_DELEG_FLAG |
  GSS_C_SEQUENCE_FLAG into req_flags).

  However, GSS_C_SEQUENCE_FLAG should only be passed in for TCP-based
  clients, not for UDP-based clients.

3.3 Client Context Establishment Major Status codes

  The gss_init_sec_context returned status code can take two different
  success values:

   - If gss_init_sec_context returns GSS_S_CONTINUE_NEEDED, then the
     client should expect the server to issue a token in the
     subsequent subnegotiation response.  The client must pass the
     token to another call to gss_init_sec_context, and repeat this
     procedure until "continue" operations are complete.

   - If gss_init_sec_context returns GSS_S_COMPLETE, then the client
     should respond to the server with any resulting output_token.

     If there is no output_token, the client should proceed to send
     the protected request details, including any required message
     protection subnegotiation as specified in sections 4 and 5
     below.

3.4 Client initial token

  The client's GSS-API implementation then typically responds with the
  resulting output_token which the client sends in a message to the
  server.

   +------+------+------+.......................+
   + ver  | mtyp | len  |       token           |
   +------+------+------+.......................+
   + 0x01 | 0x01 | 0x02 | up to 2^16 - 1 octets |
   +------+------+------+.......................+






McMahon                     Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 1961          GSS-API Authentication for SOCKS V5          June 1996


   Where:

   - "ver" is the protocol version number, here 1 to represent the
     first version of the SOCKS/GSS-API protocol

   - "mtyp" is the message type, here 1 to represent an
     authentication message

   - "len" is the length of the "token" field in octets

   - "token" is the opaque authentication token emitted by GSS-API

3.5 Client GSS-API Initialisation Failure

  If, however, the client's GSS-API implementation failed during
  gss_init_sec_context, the client must close its connection to the
  server.

3.6 Server Context Establishment

  For the case where a client successfully sends a token emitted by
  gss_init_sec_context() to the server, the server must pass the
  client-supplied token to gss_accept_sec_context as input_token.

  When calling gss_accept_sec_context() for the first time, the
  context_handle argument is initially set to GSS_C_NO_CONTEXT.

  For portability, verifier_cred_handle is set to GSS_C_NO_CREDENTIAL
  to specify default credentials (for acceptor usage).

  If gss_accept_sec_context returns GSS_CONTINUE_NEEDED, the server
  should return the generated output_token to the client, and
  subsequently pass the resulting client supplied token to another call
  to gss_accept_sec_context.

  If gss_accept_sec_context returns GSS_S_COMPLETE, then, if an
  output_token is returned, the server should return it to the client.

  If no token is returned, a zero length token should be sent by the
  server to signal to the client that it is ready to receive the
  client's request.










McMahon                     Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 1961          GSS-API Authentication for SOCKS V5          June 1996


3.7 Server Reply

  In all continue/confirmation cases, the server uses the same message
  type as for the client -> server interaction.

   +------+------+------+.......................+
   + ver  | mtyp | len  |       token           |
   +------+------+------+.......................+
   + 0x01 | 0x01 | 0x02 | up to 2^16 - 1 octets |
   +------+------+------+.......................+

3.8 Security Context Failure

  If the server refuses the client's connection for any reason (GSS-API
  authentication failure or otherwise), it will return:

   +------+------+
   + ver  | mtyp |
   +------+------+
   + 0x01 | 0xff |
   +------+------+

   Where:

   - "ver" is the protocol version number, here 1 to represent the
     first version of the SOCKS/GSS-API protocol

   - "mtyp" is the message type, here 0xff to represent an abort
     message

4. GSS-API Protection-level Options

4.1 Message protection

  Establishment of a GSS-API security context enables comunicating
  peers to determine which per-message protection services are
  available to them through the gss_init_sec_context() and
  gss_accept_sec_context() ret_flags GSS_C_INTEG_FLAG and
  GSS_C_CONF_FLAG which respectively indicate message integrity and
  confidentiality services.

  It is necessary to ensure that the message protection applied to the
  traffic is appropriate to the sensitivity of the data, and the
  severity of the threats.







McMahon                     Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 1961          GSS-API Authentication for SOCKS V5          June 1996


4.2 Message Protection Subnegotiation

  For TCP and UDP clients and servers, different levels of protection
  are possible in the SOCKS V5 protocol, so an additional
  subnegotiation stage is needed to agree the message protection level.
  After successful completion of this subnegotiation, TCP and UDP
  clients and servers use GSS-API encapsulation as defined in section
  5.1.

  After successful establishment of a GSS-API security context, the
  client's GSS-API implementation sends its required security context
  protection level to the server.  The server then returns the security
  context protection level which it agrees to - which may or may not
  take the the client's request into account.

  The security context protection level sent by client and server must
  be one of the following values:

        1 required per-message integrity
        2 required per-message integrity and confidentiality
        3 selective per-message integrity or confidentiality based on
          local client and server configurations

  It is anticipated that most implementations will agree on level 1 or
  2 due to the practical difficulties in applying selective controls to
  messages passed through a socks library.

4.3 Message Protection Subnegotiation Message Format

  The security context protection level is sent from client to server
  and vice versa using the following protected message format:

   +------+------+------+.......................+
   + ver  | mtyp | len  |   token               |
   +------+------+------+.......................+
   + 0x01 | 0x02 | 0x02 | up to 2^16 - 1 octets |
   +------+------+------+.......................+

   Where:

   - "ver" is the protocol version number, here 1 to represent the
     first version of the SOCKS/GSS-API protocol

   - "mtyp" is the message type, here 2 to represent a protection
     -level negotiation message

   - "len" is the length of the "token" field in octets




McMahon                     Standards Track                     [Page 6]

RFC 1961          GSS-API Authentication for SOCKS V5          June 1996


   - "token" is the GSS-API encapsulated protection level

4.4 Message Protection Subnegotiation Message Generation

  The token is produced by encapsulating an octet containing the
  required protection level using gss_seal()/gss_wrap() with conf_req
  set to FALSE.  The token is verified using gss_unseal()/
  gss_unwrap().

  If the server's choice of protection level is unacceptable to the
  client, then the client must close its connection to the server

5. GSS-API Per-message Protection

  For TCP and UDP clients and servers, the GSS-API functions for
  encapsulation and de-encapsulation shall be used by implementations -
  i.e. gss_seal()/gss_wrap(), and gss_unseal()/ gss_unwrap().

  The default value of quality of protection shall be specified, and
  the use of conf_req_flag shall be as determined by the previous
  subnegotiation step.  If protection level 1 is agreed then
  conf_req_flag MUST always be FALSE; if protection level 2 is agreed
  then conf_req_flag MUST always be TRUE; and if protection level 3 is
  agreed then conf_req is determined on a per-message basis by client
  and server using local configuration.

  All encapsulated messages are prefixed by the following framing:

   +------+------+------+.......................+
   + ver  | mtyp | len  |       token           |
   +------+------+------+.......................+
   + 0x01 | 0x03 | 0x02 | up to 2^16 - 1 octets |
   +------+------+------+.......................+

   Where:

   - "ver" is the protocol version number, here 1 to represent the
     first version of the SOCKS/GSS-API protocol

   - "mtyp" is the message type, here 3 to represent encapulated user
     data

   - "len" is the length of the "token" field in octets

   - "token" is the user data encapsulated by GSS-API






McMahon                     Standards Track                     [Page 7]

RFC 1961          GSS-API Authentication for SOCKS V5          June 1996


6. GSS-API Security Context Termination

  The GSS-API context termination message (emitted by
  gss_delete_sec_context) is not used by this protocol.

  When the connection is closed, each peer invokes
  gss_delete_sec_context() passing GSS_C_NO_BUFFER into the
  output_token argument.

7. References

   [RFC 1508] Linn, J., "Generic Security Service API",
              September 1993.

   [RFC 1509] Wray, J., "Generic Security Service API : C-bindings",
              September 1993.

   [SOCKS V5] Leech, M., Ganis, M., Lee, Y., Kuris, R., Koblas, D.,
              and L. Jones, "SOCKS Protocol V5", RFC 1928, April
              1996.

8. Acknowledgment

  This document builds from a previous memo produced by Marcus Leech
  (BNR) - whose comments are gratefully acknowleged.  It also reflects
  input from the AFT WG, and comments arising from implementation
  experience by Xavier Gosselin (IUT Lyons).

9. Security Considerations

  The security services provided through the GSS-API are entirely
  dependent on the effectiveness of the underlying security mechanisms,
  and the correctness of the implementation of the underlying
  algorithms and protocols.

  The user of a GSS-API service must ensure that the quality of
  protection provided by the mechanism implementation is consistent
  with their security policy.

  In addition, where negotiation is supported under the GSS-API,
  constraints on acceptable mechanisms may be imposed to ensure
  suitability for application to authenticated firewall traversal.









McMahon                     Standards Track                     [Page 8]

RFC 1961          GSS-API Authentication for SOCKS V5          June 1996


10. Author's Address

  P. V. McMahon
  ICL Enterprises
  Kings House
  33 Kings Road
  Reading, RG1 3PX
  UK

  EMail: [email protected]
  Phone: +44 1734 634882
  Fax:   +44 1734 855106







































McMahon                     Standards Track                     [Page 9]