Network Working Group                                          R. Pethia
Request for Comments: 1281                Software Engineering Institute
                                                             S. Crocker
                                      Trusted Information Systems, Inc.
                                                              B. Fraser
                                         Software Engineering Institute
                                                          November 1991


         Guidelines for the Secure Operation of the Internet

Status of this Memo

  This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
  not specify an Internet standard.  Distribution of this memo is
  unlimited.

Preamble

  The purpose of this document is to provide a set of guidelines to aid
  in the secure operation of the Internet.  During its history, the
  Internet has grown significantly and is now quite diverse.  Its
  participants include government institutions and agencies, academic
  and research institutions, commercial network and electronic mail
  carriers, non-profit research centers and an increasing array of
  industrial organizations who are primarily users of the technology.
  Despite this dramatic growth, the system is still operated on a
  purely collaborative basis.  Each participating network takes
  responsibility for its own operation.  Service providers, private
  network operators, users and vendors all cooperate to keep the system
  functioning.

  It is important to recognize that the voluntary nature of the
  Internet system is both its strength and, perhaps, its most fragile
  aspect.  Rules of operation, like the rules of etiquette, are
  voluntary and, largely, unenforceable, except where they happen to
  coincide with national laws, violation of which can lead to
  prosecution.  A common set of rules for the successful and
  increasingly secure operation of the Internet can, at best, be
  voluntary, since the laws of various countries are not uniform
  regarding data networking.  Indeed, the guidelines outlined below
  also can be only voluntary.  However, since joining the Internet is
  optional, it is also fair to argue that any Internet rules of
  behavior are part of the bargain for joining and that failure to
  observe them, apart from any legal infrastructure available, are
  grounds for sanctions.





Pethia, Crocker, & Fraser                                       [Page 1]

RFC 1281          Guidelines for the Secure Operation      November 1991


Introduction

  These guidelines address the entire Internet community, consisting of
  users, hosts, local, regional, domestic and international backbone
  networks, and vendors who supply operating systems, routers, network
  management tools, workstations and other network components.

  Security is understood to include protection of the privacy of
  information, protection of information against unauthorized
  modification, protection of systems against denial of service, and
  protection of systems against unauthorized access.

  These guidelines encompass six main points.  These points are
  repeated and elaborated in the next section.  In addition, a
  bibliography of computer and network related references has been
  provided at the end of this document for use by the reader.

Security Guidelines

  (1)  Users are individually responsible for understanding and
       respecting the security policies of the systems (computers and
       networks) they are using.  Users are individually accountable
       for their own behavior.

  (2)  Users have a responsibility to employ available security
       mechanisms and procedures for protecting their own data.  They
       also have a responsibility for assisting in the protection of
       the systems they use.

  (3)  Computer and network service providers are responsible for
       maintaining the security of the systems they operate.  They are
       further responsible for notifying users of their security
       policies and any changes to these policies.

  (4)  Vendors and system developers are responsible for providing
       systems which are sound and which embody adequate security
       controls.

  (5)  Users, service providers, and hardware and software vendors are
       responsible for cooperating to provide security.

  (6)  Technical improvements in Internet security protocols should be
       sought on a continuing basis.  At the same time, personnel
       developing new protocols, hardware or software for the Internet
       are expected to include security considerations as part of the
       design and development process.





Pethia, Crocker, & Fraser                                       [Page 2]

RFC 1281          Guidelines for the Secure Operation      November 1991


Elaboration

  (1)  Users are individually responsible for understanding and
       respecting the security policies of the systems (computers and
       networks) they are using.  Users are individually accountable
       for their own behavior.

       Users are responsible for their own behavior.  Weaknesses in
       the security of a system are not a license to penetrate or
       abuse a system.  Users are expected to be aware of the security
       policies of computers and networks which they access and to
       adhere to these policies.  One clear consequence of this
       guideline is that unauthorized access to a computer or use of a
       network is explicitly a violation of Internet rules of conduct,
       no matter how weak the protection of those computers or networks.

       There is growing international attention to legal prohibition
       against unauthorized access to computer systems, and several
       countries have recently passed legislation that addresses the
       area (e.g., United Kingdom, Australia).  In the United States,
       the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986, Title 18 U.S.C.
       section 1030 makes it a crime, in certain situations, to access
       a Federal interest computer (federal government computers,
       financial institution computers, and a computer which is one of
       two or more computers used in committing the offense, not all of
       which are located in the same state) without authorization.
       Most of the 50 states in the U.S have similar laws.

       Another aspect of this part of the policy is that users are
       individually responsible for all use of resources assigned to
       them, and hence sharing of accounts and access to resources is
       strongly discouraged.  However, since access to resources is
       assigned by individual sites and network operators, the
       specific rules governing sharing of accounts and protection of
       access is necessarily a local matter.

  (2)  Users have a responsibility to employ available security
       mechanisms and procedures for protecting their own data.  They
       also have a responsibility for assisting in the protection of
       the systems they use.

       Users are expected to handle account privileges in a
       responsible manner and to follow site procedures for the
       security of their data as well as that of the system.  For
       systems which rely upon password protection, users should
       select good passwords and periodically change them.  Proper
       use of file protection mechanisms (e.g., access control lists)
       so as to define and maintain appropriate file access control



Pethia, Crocker, & Fraser                                       [Page 3]

RFC 1281          Guidelines for the Secure Operation      November 1991


       is also part of this responsibility.

  (3)  Computer and network service providers are responsible for
       maintaining the security of the systems they operate.  They are
       further responsible for notifying users of their security
       policies and any changes to these policies.

       A computer or network service provider may manage resources on
       behalf of users within an organization (e.g., provision of
       network and computer services with a university) or it may
       provide services to a larger, external community (e.g., a
       regional network provider).  These resources may include host
       computers employed by users, routers, terminal servers, personal
       computers or other devices that have access to the Internet.

       Because the Internet itself is neither centrally managed nor
       operated, responsibility for security rests with the owners and
       operators of the subscriber components of the Internet.
       Moreover, even if there were a central authority for this
       infrastructure, security necessarily is the responsibility of
       the owners and operators of the systems which are the primary
       data and processing resources of the Internet.

       There are tradeoffs between stringent security measures at a
       site and ease of use of systems (e.g., stringent security
       measures may complicate user access to the Internet).  If a site
       elects to operate an unprotected, open system, it may be
       providing a platform for attacks on other Internet hosts while
       concealing the attacker's identity.  Sites which do operate
       open systems are nonetheless responsible for the behavior of
       the systems' users and should be prepared to render assistance
       to other sites when needed.  Whenever possible, sites should
       try to ensure authenticated Internet access.  The readers are
       directed to appendix A for a brief descriptive list of elements
       of good security.

       Sites (including network service providers) are encouraged to
       develop security policies.  These policies should be clearly
       communicated to users and subscribers.  The Site Security
       Handbook (FYI 8, RFC 1244) provides useful information and
       guidance on developing good security policies and procedures
       at both the site and network level.

  (4)  Vendors and system developers are responsible for providing
       systems which are sound and which embody adequate security
       controls.





Pethia, Crocker, & Fraser                                       [Page 4]

RFC 1281          Guidelines for the Secure Operation      November 1991


       A vendor or system developer should evaluate each system in
       terms of security controls prior to the introduction of the
       system into the Internet community.  Each product (whether
       offered for sale or freely distributed) should describe the
       security features it incorporates.

       Vendors and system developers have an obligation to repair
       flaws in the security relevant portions of the systems they
       sell (or freely provide) for use in the Internet.  They are
       expected to cooperate with the Internet community in
       establishing mechanisms for the reporting of security flaws and
       in making security-related fixes available to the community in
       a timely fashion.

  (5)  Users, service providers, and hardware and software vendors are
       responsible for cooperating to provide security.

       The Internet is a cooperative venture.  The culture and
       practice in the Internet is to render assistance in security
       matters to other sites and networks.  Each site is expected to
       notify other sites if it detects a penetration in progress at
       the other sites, and all sites are expected to help one another
       respond to security violations.  This assistance may include
       tracing connections, tracking violators and assisting law
       enforcement efforts.

       There is a growing appreciation within the Internet community
       that security violators should be identified and held
       accountable.  This means that once a violation has been detected,
       sites are encouraged to cooperate in finding the violator and
       assisting in enforcement efforts.  It is recognized that many
       sites will face a trade-off between securing their sites as
       rapidly as possible versus leaving their site open in the hopes
       of identifying the violator.  Sites will also be faced with the
       dilemma of limiting the knowledge of a penetration versus
       exposing the fact that a penetration has occurred.  This policy
       does not dictate that a site must expose either its system or
       its reputation if it decides not to, but sites are encouraged
       to render as much assistance as they can.

  (6)  Technical improvements in Internet security protocols should be
       sought on a continuing basis.  At the same time, personnel
       developing new protocols, hardware or software for the Internet
       are expected to include security considerations as part of the
       design and development process.

       The points discussed above are all administrative in nature,
       but technical advances are also important.  Existing protocols



Pethia, Crocker, & Fraser                                       [Page 5]

RFC 1281          Guidelines for the Secure Operation      November 1991


       and operating systems do not provide the level of security that
       is desired and feasible today.  Three types of advances are
       encouraged:

       (a)  Improvements should be made in the basic security
            mechanisms already in place.  Password security is
            generally poor throughout the Internet and can be
            improved markedly through the use of tools to administer
            password assignment and through the use of better
            authentication technology.  At the same time, the
            Internet user population is expanding to include a
            larger percentage of technically unsophisticated users.
            Security defaults on delivered systems and the controls
            for administering security must be geared to this growing
            population.

        (b)  Security extensions to the protocol suite are needed.
             Candidate protocols which should be augmented to improve
             security include network management, routing, file
             transfer, telnet, and mail.

        (c)  The design and implementation of operating systems should
             be improved to place more emphasis on security and pay
             more attention to the quality of the implementation of
             security within systems on the Internet.

APPENDIX A

  Five areas should be addressed in improving local security:

  (1)  There must be a clear statement of the local security policy,
       and this policy must be communicated to the users and other
       relevant parties.  The policy should be on file and available
       to users at all times, and should be communicated to users as
       part of providing access to the system.

  (2)  Adequate security controls must be implemented.  At a minimum,
       this means controlling access to systems via passwords,
       instituting sound password management, and configuring the
       system to protect itself and the information within it.

  (3)  There must be a capability to monitor security compliance and
       respond to incidents involving violation of security.  Logs of
       logins, attempted logins, and other security-relevant events
       are strongly advised, as well as regular audit of these logs.
       Also recommended is a capability to trace connections and other
       events in response to penetrations.  However, it is important
       for service providers to have a well thought out and published



Pethia, Crocker, & Fraser                                       [Page 6]

RFC 1281          Guidelines for the Secure Operation      November 1991


       policy about what information they gather, who has access to it
       and for what purposes.  Maintaining the privacy of network
       users should be kept in mind when developing such a policy.

  (4)  There must be an established chain of communication and control
       to handle security matters.  A responsible person should be
       identified as the security contact.  The means for reaching the
       security contact should be made known to all users and should
       be registered in public directories, and it should be easy for
       computer emergency response centers to find contact information
       at any time.

       The security contact should be familiar with the technology and
       configuration of all systems at the site or should be able to
       get in touch with those who have this knowledge at any time.
       Likewise, the security contact should be pre-authorized to make
       a best effort to deal with a security incident, or should be
       able to contact those with the authority at any time.

  (5)  Sites and networks which are notified of security incidents
       should respond in a timely and effective manner.  In the case
       of penetrations or other violations, sites and networks should
       allocate resources and capabilities to identify the nature of
       the incident and limit the damage.  A site or network cannot be
       considered to have good security if it does not respond to
       incidents in a timely and effective fashion.

       If a violator can be identified, appropriate action should be
       taken to ensure that no further violations are caused.  Exactly
       what sanctions should be brought against a violator depend on
       the nature of the incident and the site environment.  For
       example, a university may choose to bring internal disciplinary
       action against a student violator.

       Similarly, sites and networks should respond when notified of
       security flaws in their systems.  Sites and networks have the
       responsibility to install fixes in their systems as they become
       available.













Pethia, Crocker, & Fraser                                       [Page 7]

RFC 1281          Guidelines for the Secure Operation      November 1991


A Bibliography of Computer and Network Security Related Documents

United States Public Laws (PL) and Federal Policies

  [1] P.L. 100-235, "The Computer Security Act of 1987", (Contained in
      Appendix C of Citation No. 12, Vol II.), Jan. 8, 1988.

  [2] P.L. 99-474 (H.R. 4718), "Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986",
      Oct. 16, 1986.

  [3] P.L. 99-508 (H.R. 4952), "Electronic Communications Privacy Act
      of 1986", Oct. 21, 1986.

  [4] P.L. 99-591, "Paperwork Reduction Reauthorization Act of 1986",
      Oct. 30, 1986.

  [5] P.L. 93-579, "Privacy Act of 1984", Dec. 31, 1984.

  [6] "National Security Decision Directive 145", (Contained in
      Appendix C of Citation No. 12, Vol II.).

  [7] "Security of Federal Automated Information Systems", (Contained
      in Appendix C of Citation No. 12, Vol II.), Appendix III of,
      Management of Federal Information Resources, Office of Management
      and Budget (OMB), Circular A-130.

  [8] "Protection of Government Contractor Telecommunications",
      (Contained in Appendix C of Citation No. 12, Vol II.), National
      Communications Security Instruction (NACSI) 6002.

Other Documents

  [9] Secure Systems Study Committee, "Computers at Risk: Safe
      Computing in the Information Age", Computer Science and
      Technology Board, National Research Council, 2101 Constitution
      Avenue, Washington, DC 20418, December 1990.

 [10] Curry, D., "Improving the Security of Your UNIX System", Report
      No. ITSTD-721-FR-90-21, SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Ave.,
      Menlo Park, CA, 94025-3493, April 1990.

 [11] Holbrook P., and J. Reynolds, Editors, "Site Security Handbook",
      FYI 8, RFC 1244, CICNet, ISI, July 1991.

 [12] "Industry Information Protection, Vols. I,II,III", Industry
      Information Security Task Force, President's National
      Telecommunications Advisory Committee, June 1988.




Pethia, Crocker, & Fraser                                       [Page 8]

RFC 1281          Guidelines for the Secure Operation      November 1991


 [13] Jelen, G., "Information Security: An Elusive Goal", Report No.
      P-85-8, Harvard University, Center for Information Policy
      Research, 200 Akin, Cambridge, MA.  02138, June 1985.

 [14] "Electronic Record Systems and Individual Privacy", OTA-CIT-296,
      Congress of the United States, Office of Technology Assessment,
      Washington, D.C. 20510, June 1986.

 [15] "Defending Secrets, Sharing Data", OTA-CIT-310, Congress of the
      United States, Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, D.C.
      20510, October 1987.

 [16] "Summary of General Legislation Relating to Privacy and Computer
      Security", Appendix 1 of, COMPUTERS and PRIVACY: How the
      Government Obtains, Verifies, Uses and Protects Personal Data,
      GAO/IMTEC-90-70BR, United States General Accounting Office,
      Washington, DC 20548, pp.  36-40, August 1990.

 [17] Stout, E., "U.S. Geological Survey System Security Plan - FY
      1990", U.S. Geological Survey ISD, MS809, Reston, VA, 22092, May
      1990.

Security Considerations

  If security considerations had not been so widely ignored in the
  Internet, this memo would not have been possible.

























Pethia, Crocker, & Fraser                                       [Page 9]

RFC 1281          Guidelines for the Secure Operation      November 1991


Authors' Addresses

  Richard D. Pethia
  Software Engineering Institute
  Carnegie Mellon University
  Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-3890

  Phone:  (412) 268-7739
  FAX:    (412) 268-6989

  EMail:  [email protected]


  Stephen D. Crocker
  Trusted Information Systems, Inc.
  3060 Washington Road
  Glenwood, Maryland 21738

  Phone:  (301) 854-6889
  FAX:    (301) 854-5363

  EMail:  [email protected]


  Barbara Y. Fraser
  Software Engineering Institute
  Carnegie Mellon University
  Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-3890

  Phone:  (412) 268-5010
  FAX:    (412) 268-6989

  EMail:  [email protected]


















Pethia, Crocker, & Fraser                                      [Page 10]